首页 > 最新文献

Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention最新文献

英文 中文
Suicide Rates and Prescription of Antidepressants. 自杀率与抗抑郁药的处方。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000941
Simone Amendola, Martin Plöderl, Michael P Hengartner

Background: Previous ecological studies reported that increasing antidepressant prescriptions were associated with decreasing suicide rates. Aim: To determine whether antidepressant prescription prevalence is negatively associated with suicide rates (i.e., as antidepressant prescribing increases, suicide rates decrease) between 1999 and 2020. Method: The study protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/978sk/). Publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (CDC WONDER) and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were used. Results: Overall, both the antidepressant prescription prevalence and the suicide rate were increasing from 1990 to 2020 in the United States. Positive trends for both outcomes were also evident when analyses were stratified according to sex and/or race/ethnicity. Pearson's correlation analyses consistently found positive associations between antidepressant prescription prevalence and suicide rates. Limitations: Trends and their associations were examined at the population level. The results cannot clarify the causal nature of the association observed. Conclusion: The results of our analysis consistently demonstrated positive trends for both antidepressant prescription prevalence and suicide rates over time as well as positive associations between them. These findings update those from previous studies and are at odds with the notion that, at a population level, more antidepressant prescriptions would lead to lower suicide rates. However, it needs to be acknowledged that ecological studies provide insufficient evidence to infer causality.

背景:以往的生态学研究报告称,抗抑郁药处方的增加与自杀率的下降有关。目的:确定在 1999 年至 2020 年期间,抗抑郁药处方的普及率是否与自杀率呈负相关(即随着抗抑郁药处方的增加,自杀率会降低)。研究方法研究方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/978sk/)上预先注册。研究使用的公开数据来自美国疾病控制和预防中心的广泛流行病学研究在线数据(CDC WONDER)和医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)。研究结果总体而言,从 1990 年到 2020 年,美国的抗抑郁药物处方流行率和自杀率都在上升。根据性别和/或种族/人种进行分层分析时,这两项结果的积极趋势也很明显。皮尔逊相关分析发现,抗抑郁药处方流行率和自杀率之间始终存在正相关。局限性:本研究在人群层面对趋势及其关联性进行了研究。研究结果无法阐明所观察到的关联的因果关系。结论我们的分析结果表明,随着时间的推移,抗抑郁药物处方流行率和自杀率都呈现出积极的趋势,两者之间也存在积极的联系。这些研究结果更新了以往的研究结果,与在人口层面上,更多的抗抑郁药物处方会导致更低的自杀率这一观点并不一致。不过,需要承认的是,生态学研究提供的证据不足以推断因果关系。
{"title":"Suicide Rates and Prescription of Antidepressants.","authors":"Simone Amendola, Martin Plöderl, Michael P Hengartner","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000941","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Previous ecological studies reported that increasing antidepressant prescriptions were associated with decreasing suicide rates. <i>Aim:</i> To determine whether antidepressant prescription prevalence is negatively associated with suicide rates (i.e., as antidepressant prescribing increases, suicide rates decrease) between 1999 and 2020. <i>Method:</i> The study protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/978sk/). Publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (CDC WONDER) and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were used. <i>Results:</i> Overall, both the antidepressant prescription prevalence and the suicide rate were increasing from 1990 to 2020 in the United States. Positive trends for both outcomes were also evident when analyses were stratified according to sex and/or race/ethnicity. Pearson's correlation analyses consistently found positive associations between antidepressant prescription prevalence and suicide rates. <i>Limitations:</i> Trends and their associations were examined at the population level. The results cannot clarify the causal nature of the association observed. <i>Conclusion:</i> The results of our analysis consistently demonstrated positive trends for both antidepressant prescription prevalence and suicide rates over time as well as positive associations between them. These findings update those from previous studies and are at odds with the notion that, at a population level, more antidepressant prescriptions would lead to lower suicide rates. However, it needs to be acknowledged that ecological studies provide insufficient evidence to infer causality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"225-233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remaining Between the Cracks - The Long-Term Effect of Different Suicide Risk Exclusion Criterion on Outcomes of an Online Intervention for Depression. 夹缝中求生存--不同自杀风险排除标准对抑郁症在线干预结果的长期影响。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000923
Alexandra Godinho, Christina Schell, John A Cunningham

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that excluding individuals at risk of suicide from online depression interventions can impact recruited sample characteristics. Aim: To determine if a small change in suicide risk exclusion criterion led to differences in the usage and effectiveness of an Internet depression intervention at 6 months of follow-up. Method: A partial sample of a recently completed online depression intervention trial was divided into two groups: those with no risk of suicide versus those with some risk. The two groups were compared for baseline demographic and clinical measures, as well as intervention uptake and treatment success across 6 months. Results: Overall, individuals with less risk of suicide at baseline reported significantly less severe clinical symptoms. Both groups interacted with the intervention at the same rate, but specific use of modules was different. Finally, the impact of intervention usage on outcomes over time did not vary by group. Limitations: While different suicide risk exclusion criteria can change recruited sample characteristics, it remains unclear how these differences impact intervention uptake and success. Conclusion: Overall, the findings suggest that researchers should exercise caution when excluding individuals at risk of suicide, as they greatly benefit from web-based interventions.

背景:以往的研究表明,将有自杀风险的人排除在网络抑郁干预之外会影响招募样本的特征。目的:确定自杀风险排除标准的微小变化是否会导致网络抑郁干预在随访 6 个月后的使用率和有效性出现差异。方法:对最近完成的在线抑郁症干预的部分样本进行分析:将最近完成的一项在线抑郁干预试验的部分样本分为两组:无自杀风险组和有自杀风险组。比较两组的基线人口统计学和临床测量指标,以及 6 个月的干预吸收率和治疗成功率。研究结果总体而言,基线时自杀风险较低的个体报告的临床症状明显较轻。两组患者与干预措施的互动率相同,但具体使用的模块不同。最后,随着时间的推移,干预措施的使用对结果的影响并不因组别而异。局限性:虽然不同的自杀风险排除标准会改变招募样本的特征,但这些差异如何影响干预的接受度和成功率仍不清楚。结论:总体而言,研究结果表明,研究人员在排除自杀风险人群时应谨慎行事,因为他们从网络干预中获益匪浅。
{"title":"Remaining Between the Cracks - The Long-Term Effect of Different Suicide Risk Exclusion Criterion on Outcomes of an Online Intervention for Depression.","authors":"Alexandra Godinho, Christina Schell, John A Cunningham","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000923","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Previous studies have demonstrated that excluding individuals at risk of suicide from online depression interventions can impact recruited sample characteristics. <i>Aim:</i> To determine if a small change in suicide risk exclusion criterion led to differences in the usage and effectiveness of an Internet depression intervention at 6 months of follow-up. <i>Method:</i> A partial sample of a recently completed online depression intervention trial was divided into two groups: those with no risk of suicide versus those with some risk. The two groups were compared for baseline demographic and clinical measures, as well as intervention uptake and treatment success across 6 months. <i>Results:</i> Overall, individuals with less risk of suicide at baseline reported significantly less severe clinical symptoms. Both groups interacted with the intervention at the same rate, but specific use of modules was different. Finally, the impact of intervention usage on outcomes over time did not vary by group. <i>Limitations:</i> While different suicide risk exclusion criteria can change recruited sample characteristics, it remains unclear how these differences impact intervention uptake and success. <i>Conclusion:</i> Overall, the findings suggest that researchers should exercise caution when excluding individuals at risk of suicide, as they greatly benefit from web-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10396087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Linguistic Analysis of Instagram Captions Between Adolescent Suicide Decedents and Living Controls. 青少年自杀死者和生活控制者之间Instagram字幕的语言学分析。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-11 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000928
Alex Walker, Ayah Zirikly, Melissa Stockbridge, Holly C Wilcox

Background: Suicide rates continue to rise for adolescents in the United States. 62% of teenagers use Instagram, and as technology and research in this domain advance, social media posts could provide insights into near-term adolescent risk states and could inform new strategies for suicide prevention. This study analyzed language in captions of teenagers' Instagram accounts in the 3 months before suicide and compared caption language to matched living controls. Method: The study identified 89 teenagers who died by suicide using obituaries and news reports and 89 matched living control teenagers. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software was used to test for differences in specific language categories across linguistic, psychological, and topical categories (e.g., word count, tone, grammar, affective, cognitive, social, punctuation marks, etc.). Results: Significant differences between suicide decedents and living controls were found. Adolescent suicide decedents used more words per sentence, more references to sadness, male individuals, drives, and leisure and fewer verbs and references to they, affiliation, achievement, and power. Limitations: Methodological limitations include the use of only public accounts, small sample size, occasional short posts, and lack of adjustment for multiple testing. Conclusion: Although the sample size is relatively small and only included youth with public accounts, we identified differences in Instagram caption language between adolescents who died by suicide as compared to living controls.

背景:美国青少年自杀率持续上升。62%的青少年使用Instagram,随着该领域技术和研究的发展,社交媒体帖子可以深入了解青少年的近期风险状态,并为预防自杀提供新的策略。这项研究分析了自杀前3个月青少年Instagram账户字幕中的语言,并将字幕语言与匹配的生活对照进行了比较。方法:通过讣告和新闻报道,该研究确定了89名自杀身亡的青少年和89名匹配的生活对照青少年。语言查询和字数统计(LIWC)软件用于测试语言、心理和主题类别(如字数、语气、语法、情感、认知、社会、标点符号等)中特定语言类别的差异。结果:自杀死者和生活对照者之间存在显著差异。青少年自杀死者每句话使用更多的单词,更多地提及悲伤、男性、动力和休闲,更少的动词和提及他们、从属关系、成就和权力。局限性:方法上的局限性包括只使用公共账户、样本量小、偶尔发布短帖子以及缺乏对多次测试的调整。结论:尽管样本量相对较小,仅包括拥有公共账户的年轻人,但我们发现,与在世的对照组相比,自杀身亡的青少年在Instagram上的说明语言存在差异。
{"title":"A Linguistic Analysis of Instagram Captions Between Adolescent Suicide Decedents and Living Controls.","authors":"Alex Walker, Ayah Zirikly, Melissa Stockbridge, Holly C Wilcox","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000928","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000928","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: Suicide rates continue to rise for adolescents in the United States. 62% of teenagers use Instagram, and as technology and research in this domain advance, social media posts could provide insights into near-term adolescent risk states and could inform new strategies for suicide prevention. This study analyzed language in captions of teenagers' Instagram accounts in the 3 months before suicide and compared caption language to matched living controls. <i>Method</i>: The study identified 89 teenagers who died by suicide using obituaries and news reports and 89 matched living control teenagers. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software was used to test for differences in specific language categories across linguistic, psychological, and topical categories (e.g., word count, tone, grammar, affective, cognitive, social, punctuation marks, etc.). <i>Results</i>: Significant differences between suicide decedents and living controls were found. Adolescent suicide decedents used more words per sentence, more references to sadness, male individuals, drives, and leisure and fewer verbs and references to they, affiliation, achievement, and power. <i>Limitations</i>: Methodological limitations include the use of only public accounts, small sample size, occasional short posts, and lack of adjustment for multiple testing. <i>Conclusion</i>: Although the sample size is relatively small and only included youth with public accounts, we identified differences in Instagram caption language between adolescents who died by suicide as compared to living controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"136-143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41216169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender and Geographical Distribution of Editorial Board Members of Three Leading Suicide Journals. 三大自杀期刊编辑委员会成员的性别和地域分布。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-21 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000919
S M Yasir Arafat, Sujita Kumar Kar, Rizwana Amin

Background: Despite the recent progress of women in academia, there is an underrepresentation of female editors in academic journals. Additionally, although suicide affects more low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than high-income countries, little is known about the geographical distribution of editors in suicidology journals. Aims: We aimed to determine the gender and geographical distribution of the editorial board members (EBMs) of leading suicide journals. Method: Data were collected between November 27 and 29, 2022. We purposively selected suicidology journals, searched the journal websites, and extracted data on the gender and affiliated country of the EBM to identify the continent and income category of the country. Results: The proportion of female EBMs was 32.37% with better representation in senior positions. Only six positions (3.47%) were occupied by four individuals affiliated with LMIC backgrounds. The highest number of EBMs was located in North America (58.38%) while one member was from Africa. Limitations: Only three purposively selected journals were scrutinized. Conclusion: This study reveals that approximately one third of the editorial positions were occupied by women and less than 4% of editors were from LMICs, where suicide represents a significant burden.

背景:尽管近年来女性在学术界取得了进步,但女性编辑在学术期刊中的代表性仍然不足。此外,虽然自杀对中低收入国家(LMIC)的影响大于高收入国家,但人们对自杀学期刊编辑的地理分布知之甚少。目的:我们旨在确定主要自杀学期刊编委会成员(EBMs)的性别和地域分布情况。方法:在 11 月 27 日至 29 日期间收集数据:数据收集时间为2022年11月27日至29日。我们有目的性地选择了自杀学期刊,搜索了期刊网站,并提取了EBM的性别和所属国家的数据,以确定该国家的大陆和收入类别。结果显示女性 EBM 的比例为 32.37%,其中高级职位的女性比例更高。只有 6 个职位(3.47%)由 4 名具有低收入国家背景的人员担任。北美洲的经济管理学家人数最多(58.38%),而一名成员来自非洲。局限性:只仔细研究了三份特意挑选的期刊。结论:本研究显示,约三分之一的编辑职位由女性担任,不到 4% 的编辑来自低收入与中等收入国家,而这些国家的自杀率很高。
{"title":"Gender and Geographical Distribution of Editorial Board Members of Three Leading Suicide Journals.","authors":"S M Yasir Arafat, Sujita Kumar Kar, Rizwana Amin","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000919","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Despite the recent progress of women in academia, there is an underrepresentation of female editors in academic journals. Additionally, although suicide affects more low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than high-income countries, little is known about the geographical distribution of editors in suicidology journals. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to determine the gender and geographical distribution of the editorial board members (EBMs) of leading suicide journals. <i>Method:</i> Data were collected between November 27 and 29, 2022. We purposively selected suicidology journals, searched the journal websites, and extracted data on the gender and affiliated country of the EBM to identify the continent and income category of the country. <i>Results:</i> The proportion of female EBMs was 32.37% with better representation in senior positions. Only six positions (3.47%) were occupied by four individuals affiliated with LMIC backgrounds. The highest number of EBMs was located in North America (58.38%) while one member was from Africa. <i>Limitations:</i> Only three purposively selected journals were scrutinized. <i>Conclusion:</i> This study reveals that approximately one third of the editorial positions were occupied by women and less than 4% of editors were from LMICs, where suicide represents a significant burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9836906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Widening Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Individuals Who Self-Harmed. 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,自我伤害者的超额死亡率不断扩大。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-13 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000882
Sze Chim Lee, Marcos DelPozo-Banos, Yasmin Friedmann, Ashley Akbari, Ronan A Lyons, Ann John

Background: Studies on COVID-19 pandemic-associated changes in mortality following self-harm remain scarce and inconclusive. Aims: To compare mortality risks in individuals who had self-harmed to those for individuals who had not, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Waves 1 and 2) in Wales, the United Kingdom, using population-based routinely collected data. Method: We linked whole population health data to all-cause mortality following an episode of self-harm between April 2016 and March 2021. Propensity score matching, Cox regression, and difference-in-differences were applied to compute changes in excess mortality (as ratios of hazard ratios, RHRs) before and during the pandemic for individuals who self-harmed. Results: The difference in mortality for individuals who self-harmed compared to those who did not widened during Wave 1 (RHR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.04-4.03) and Wave 2 (RHR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.12-4.29) from before the pandemic. Stratification by sex and age group produced no significant subgroup differences although risk for younger than 65 years group were higher. Limitations: Limitations include small sample size and incomplete data on cause-specific deaths during the pandemic. Conclusion: Our results underscore continuous monitoring of mortality of individuals who self-harm and effective interventions to address any increases in mortality.

背景:有关 COVID-19 大流行导致自残后死亡率变化的研究仍然很少,也没有定论。目的:利用基于人口的常规收集数据,比较在英国威尔士 COVID-19 大流行(第 1 波和第 2 波)之前和期间,自残者与未自残者的死亡风险。方法:我们将整个人口健康数据与 2016 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间发生自残事件后的全因死亡率联系起来。应用倾向得分匹配、Cox 回归和差分法计算大流行前和大流行期间自我伤害者的超额死亡率变化(危险比比率,RHRs)。结果显示与大流行前相比,在第一波(RHR = 2.03,95% CI:1.04-4.03)和第二波(RHR = 2.19,95% CI:1.12-4.29)期间,自我伤害者与非自我伤害者的死亡率差异有所扩大。虽然 65 岁以下人群的风险较高,但按性别和年龄组进行分层并无明显的亚组差异。局限性:局限性包括样本量较小以及大流行期间特定死因的数据不完整。结论:我们的研究结果强调要持续监测自我伤害者的死亡率,并采取有效的干预措施来应对死亡率的上升。
{"title":"Widening Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Individuals Who Self-Harmed.","authors":"Sze Chim Lee, Marcos DelPozo-Banos, Yasmin Friedmann, Ashley Akbari, Ronan A Lyons, Ann John","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000882","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Studies on COVID-19 pandemic-associated changes in mortality following self-harm remain scarce and inconclusive. <i>Aims:</i> To compare mortality risks in individuals who had self-harmed to those for individuals who had not, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Waves 1 and 2) in Wales, the United Kingdom, using population-based routinely collected data. <i>Method:</i> We linked whole population health data to all-cause mortality following an episode of self-harm between April 2016 and March 2021. Propensity score matching, Cox regression, and difference-in-differences were applied to compute changes in excess mortality (as ratios of hazard ratios, RHRs) before and during the pandemic for individuals who self-harmed. <i>Results:</i> The difference in mortality for individuals who self-harmed compared to those who did not widened during Wave 1 (RHR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.04-4.03) and Wave 2 (RHR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.12-4.29) from before the pandemic. Stratification by sex and age group produced no significant subgroup differences although risk for younger than 65 years group were higher. <i>Limitations:</i> Limitations include small sample size and incomplete data on cause-specific deaths during the pandemic. <i>Conclusion:</i> Our results underscore continuous monitoring of mortality of individuals who self-harm and effective interventions to address any increases in mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"154-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999850/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9206303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
LGBTQ+ Suicide - A Call to Action for Researchers and Governments on the Politics, Practices, and Possibilities of LGBTQ+ Suicide Prevention. LGBTQ+ 自杀--就预防 LGBTQ+ 自杀的政治、实践和可能性向研究人员和政府发出的行动呼吁。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000950
Hazel Marzetti, Charlie Cooper, Andre Mason, Nikki L van Eijk, John Gunn Iii, Katerina Kavalidou, Tiago C Zortea, Emma Nielsen
{"title":"LGBTQ+ Suicide - A Call to Action for Researchers and Governments on the Politics, Practices, and Possibilities of LGBTQ+ Suicide Prevention.","authors":"Hazel Marzetti, Charlie Cooper, Andre Mason, Nikki L van Eijk, John Gunn Iii, Katerina Kavalidou, Tiago C Zortea, Emma Nielsen","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000950","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000950","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 2","pages":"87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140132867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Cost-Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions Following Self-Harm in Australia. 澳大利亚自我伤害后心理社会干预的成本效益。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000926
Karolina Krysinska, Karl Andriessen, Piumee Bandara, Lennart Reifels, Anna Flego, Andrew Page, Marisa Schlichthorst, Jane Pirkis, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Long Khanh-Dao Le

Background: Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults, in particular cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), can be effective in lowering the risk of repeated self-harm. Aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CBT for reducing repeated self-harm in the Australian context. Method: The current study adopted the accessing cost-effectiveness (ACE) approach using return-on-investment (ROI) analysis. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses (Sas) tested the robustness of the model outputs to changes in three assumptions: general practitioner referral pathway (SA1), private setting intervention delivery (SA2), and training costs (SA3). Results: The intervention produced cost savings of A$ 46M (95% UI -223.7 to 73.3) and A$ 18.3M (95% UI -86.2 to 24.6), subject to the effect of intervention lasting 2- or 1-year follow-up. The ROI ratio reduced to 5.22 in SA1 (95% UI -10.1 to 27.9), 2.5 in SA2 (95% UI -4.8 to 13.3), and 5.1 in SA3 (95% UI -9.8 to 27.8). Limitations: We assumed that the effectiveness would reduce 50% within 5 years in the base case, and we used Australian data and a partial social perspective. Conclusions: The current study demonstrated cost-effectiveness of CBT for adults who have self-harmed with the return-on-investment ratio of A$ 2.3 to $6.0 for every A$ 1 invested.

背景成人自残后的心理社会干预,特别是认知行为疗法(CBT),可以有效降低反复自残的风险。目的评估CBT在澳大利亚减少重复自残的成本效益。方法本研究采用获取成本效益(ACE)方法,采用投资回报率(ROI)分析。不确定性和敏感性分析(Sas)测试了模型输出对三个假设变化的稳健性:全科医生转诊途径(SA1)、私人环境干预提供(SA2)和培训成本(SA3)。结果干预节省了4600万澳元(95%UI-223.7至73.3)和1830万澳元(95%UI-86.2至24.6),但干预效果持续2年或1年。SA1的投资回报率降至5.22(95%UI-10.1至27.9),SA2降至2.5(95%UI-4.8至13.3),SA3降至5.1(95%UI 9.8至27.8)。限制我们假设在基本情况下,有效性将在5年内降低50%,我们使用了澳大利亚的数据和部分社会视角。结论目前的研究证明了CBT对自残成年人的成本效益,每投资1澳元,投资回报率为2.3澳元至6.0澳元。
{"title":"The Cost-Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions Following Self-Harm in Australia.","authors":"Karolina Krysinska, Karl Andriessen, Piumee Bandara, Lennart Reifels, Anna Flego, Andrew Page, Marisa Schlichthorst, Jane Pirkis, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Long Khanh-Dao Le","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000926","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000926","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults, in particular cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), can be effective in lowering the risk of repeated self-harm. <i>Aims:</i> To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CBT for reducing repeated self-harm in the Australian context. <i>Method:</i> The current study adopted the accessing cost-effectiveness (ACE) approach using return-on-investment (ROI) analysis. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses (Sas) tested the robustness of the model outputs to changes in three assumptions: general practitioner referral pathway (SA1), private setting intervention delivery (SA2), and training costs (SA3). <i>Results:</i> The intervention produced cost savings of A$ 46M (95% UI -223.7 to 73.3) and A$ 18.3M (95% UI -86.2 to 24.6), subject to the effect of intervention lasting 2- or 1-year follow-up. The ROI ratio reduced to 5.22 in SA1 (95% UI -10.1 to 27.9), 2.5 in SA2 (95% UI -4.8 to 13.3), and 5.1 in SA3 (95% UI -9.8 to 27.8). <i>Limitations:</i> We assumed that the effectiveness would reduce 50% within 5 years in the base case, and we used Australian data and a partial social perspective. <i>Conclusions:</i> The current study demonstrated cost-effectiveness of CBT for adults who have self-harmed with the return-on-investment ratio of A$ 2.3 to $6.0 for every A$ 1 invested.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"118-127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71414737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Prevalence of Suicidal Behavior in Autism Spectrum Disorder. 自闭症谱系障碍中自杀行为的发生率。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000922
Anne Huntjens, Annemiek Landlust, Sophie Wissenburg, Mark van der Gaag

Background: Suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA) are common in autistic individuals, but prevalence rates have not yet been estimated with meta-analysis. Aims: This meta-analysis aims to estimate SI and SA prevalence rates in autistic individuals and identify subgroup differences based on sample characteristics and study quality. Methods: A systematic search identified 52 studies with 88,509 autistic participants reporting SI and SA. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Pooled prevalence estimates of lifetime SI and SA were 37.2% [95% CI 25.3-50.8] and 15.3% [95% CI 9.5-23.6], respectively. For 12-month prevalence, this was 25.4% [95% CI 19.0-33.2] and 14.1% [95% CI 7.4-25.2], respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences based on age (SI), region (SI), data collection (SI), measurement scales used to define autism and suicidality (SA), and representation of the study sample (SI and SA). Heterogeneity measures were high for all outcomes (I2 = 60.3-99.1%). Limitations: The heterogeneity of the included studies may limit the generalizability of our findings. Conclusion: The high rates of suicidal problems in autistic individuals call for a systematic evaluation of suicidality in clinical practice and adequate therapeutic interventions to improve this condition.

背景:自杀意念(SI)和自杀未遂(SA)在自闭症患者中很常见,但尚未通过荟萃分析估算其患病率。目的:本荟萃分析旨在估算自闭症患者的自杀意念(SI)和自杀未遂(SA)发生率,并根据样本特征和研究质量确定亚组差异。方法:通过系统性检索确定了 52 项研究:通过系统性检索确定了 52 项研究,共有 88,509 名自闭症患者报告了 SI 和 SA。采用随机效应模型计算了汇总的患病率估计值。结果终生 SI 和 SA 的汇总流行率估计值分别为 37.2% [95% CI 25.3-50.8] 和 15.3% [95% CI 9.5-23.6]。12 个月的患病率分别为 25.4% [95% CI 19.0-33.2] 和 14.1% [95% CI 7.4-25.2]。亚组分析显示,年龄(SI)、地区(SI)、数据收集(SI)、用于定义自闭症和自杀倾向的测量量表(SA)以及研究样本的代表性(SI 和 SA)均存在显著差异。所有结果的异质性都很高(I2 = 60.3-99.1%)。局限性:所纳入研究的异质性可能会限制我们研究结果的推广性。结论自闭症患者的自杀率很高,因此需要对临床实践中的自杀倾向进行系统评估,并采取适当的治疗干预措施来改善这一状况。
{"title":"The Prevalence of Suicidal Behavior in Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Anne Huntjens, Annemiek Landlust, Sophie Wissenburg, Mark van der Gaag","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000922","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA) are common in autistic individuals, but prevalence rates have not yet been estimated with meta-analysis. <i>Aims:</i> This meta-analysis aims to estimate SI and SA prevalence rates in autistic individuals and identify subgroup differences based on sample characteristics and study quality. <i>Methods:</i> A systematic search identified 52 studies with 88,509 autistic participants reporting SI and SA. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. <i>Results:</i> Pooled prevalence estimates of lifetime SI and SA were 37.2% [95% CI 25.3-50.8] and 15.3% [95% CI 9.5-23.6], respectively. For 12-month prevalence, this was 25.4% [95% CI 19.0-33.2] and 14.1% [95% CI 7.4-25.2], respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences based on age (SI), region (SI), data collection (SI), measurement scales used to define autism and suicidality (SA), and representation of the study sample (SI and SA). Heterogeneity measures were high for all outcomes (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 60.3-99.1%). <i>Limitations:</i> The heterogeneity of the included studies may limit the generalizability of our findings. <i>Conclusion:</i> The high rates of suicidal problems in autistic individuals call for a systematic evaluation of suicidality in clinical practice and adequate therapeutic interventions to improve this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"144-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10210407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Implementation of Web-Based Safety Planning Intervention Training for Firefighter Peer Support Specialists. 为消防员同行支持专家开发和实施基于Web的安全规划干预培训。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000924
Nathan A Kimbrel, Natalie A Aho, Lydia C Neal, Sarah A Bernes, Tiffany A Beaver, Jeffrey A Hertzberg, Alice Lutrey, Frank Leto, Willy Ostiguy, Claire Cammarata, Eric C Meyer, Sarah M Wilson, Michelle F Dennis, Patrick S Calhoun, Jean C Beckham, Barbara Stanley, Suzy B Gulliver

Background: Recent findings indicate that firefighters may be at increased risk for death by suicide; however, there has been only limited suicide prevention work in fire service to date. Aim: The objective of this program evaluation project was to develop and evaluate a web-based Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) training course for firefighter peer support specialists. Method: Peer support specialists who completed the web-based SPI training were administered evaluation questionnaires before the training and then again at a 3-month follow-up assessment. Results: A total of 213 peer support specialists completed the SPI training. Most participants took 2-3 h to complete the training. Participants generally reported high levels of satisfaction with the course, with the vast majority (94.4%) indicating they would recommend it to their peers. Course completers also demonstrated significant gains in SPI knowledge and self-efficacy from baseline to 3-month follow-up (all p's < .001). Moreover, the percentage of participants who reported completing a safety plan with someone they suspected at being of risk for suicide increased approximately 7-fold from baseline (3.5%) to 3-month follow-up (25.2%; p < .001). Participants further reported that 97.6% of the safety plans that they completed resulted in a positive outcome. Limitations: This was a program evaluation project that did not include a control group. Thus, causality cannot be inferred. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that web-based SPI training is a feasible and scalable approach for training peer support specialists to deliver the SPI to at-risk individuals.

背景:最近的研究结果表明,消防员自杀死亡的风险可能会增加;然而,到目前为止,消防部门只有有限的自杀预防工作。目的:该项目评估项目的目的是为消防员同伴支持专家开发和评估基于网络的安全规划干预(SPI)培训课程。方法:完成基于网络的SPI培训的同伴支持专家在培训前接受评估问卷,然后在3个月的随访评估中再次进行评估。结果:共有213名同行支持专家完成了SPI培训。大多数参与者需要2-3小时才能完成培训。参与者普遍表示对该课程的满意度很高,绝大多数(94.4%)表示他们会向同龄人推荐该课程。从基线到3个月的随访,课程完成者在SPI知识和自我效能方面也表现出显著的提高(所有p<0.001)。此外,从基线(3.5%)到3个月的随访(25.2%;p<.001),报告与他们怀疑有自杀风险的人一起完成安全计划的参与者比例增加了约7倍。参与者进一步报告,他们完成的97.6%的安全计划产生了积极的结果。限制:这是一个不包括对照组的项目评估。因此,无法推断因果关系。结论:目前的研究结果表明,基于网络的SPI培训是一种可行且可扩展的方法,可以培训同伴支持专家,将SPI提供给高危个体。
{"title":"Development and Implementation of Web-Based Safety Planning Intervention Training for Firefighter Peer Support Specialists.","authors":"Nathan A Kimbrel, Natalie A Aho, Lydia C Neal, Sarah A Bernes, Tiffany A Beaver, Jeffrey A Hertzberg, Alice Lutrey, Frank Leto, Willy Ostiguy, Claire Cammarata, Eric C Meyer, Sarah M Wilson, Michelle F Dennis, Patrick S Calhoun, Jean C Beckham, Barbara Stanley, Suzy B Gulliver","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000924","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Recent findings indicate that firefighters may be at increased risk for death by suicide; however, there has been only limited suicide prevention work in fire service to date. <i>Aim:</i> The objective of this program evaluation project was to develop and evaluate a web-based Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) training course for firefighter peer support specialists. <i>Method:</i> Peer support specialists who completed the web-based SPI training were administered evaluation questionnaires before the training and then again at a 3-month follow-up assessment. <i>Results:</i> A total of 213 peer support specialists completed the SPI training. Most participants took 2-3 h to complete the training. Participants generally reported high levels of satisfaction with the course, with the vast majority (94.4%) indicating they would recommend it to their peers. Course completers also demonstrated significant gains in SPI knowledge and self-efficacy from baseline to 3-month follow-up (all <i>p</i>'s < .001). Moreover, the percentage of participants who reported completing a safety plan with someone they suspected at being of risk for suicide increased approximately 7-fold from baseline (3.5%) to 3-month follow-up (25.2%; <i>p</i> < .001). Participants further reported that 97.6% of the safety plans that they completed resulted in a positive outcome. <i>Limitations:</i> This was a program evaluation project that did not include a control group. Thus, causality cannot be inferred. <i>Conclusions:</i> The present findings suggest that web-based SPI training is a feasible and scalable approach for training peer support specialists to deliver the SPI to at-risk individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"108-117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41177278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Suicide Methods in Slovenia - Characteristics andTime Trends 2001-2020. 斯洛文尼亚的自杀方式 - 2001-2020 年的特点和时间趋势。
IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-09 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000918
Petra Mikolič, Matej Vinko, Nina Ropret, Saška Roškar

Background: Between 2001 and 2020, Slovenia lost 8,952 lives due to suicides, two thirds of them by hanging. Aim: To analyze trends in suicide methods between 2001 and 2020 and to explore relationships between suicide methods and selected sociodemographic characteristic. Methods: We focused on methods accounting for 95.7% of all suicides. We performed joinpoint regression to examine changes in suicide rates by respective methods and multivariate logistic regression analyses to study sociodemographics associated with specific suicide methods. Results: A gender-specific annual decrease in suicide rates was observed in all methods except for sharp objects and jumping or lying in front of a moving object. Age was statistically significant in the use of firearms and jumping or lying in front of a moving object, while gender was significant in all methods. Associations were found between education, marital status, region of residence, and various suicide methods. Limitations: The results are potentially culturally specific. Conclusion: Certain sociodemographics seem to be associated with the selection of the method.

背景:2001 年至 2020 年间,斯洛文尼亚有 8,952 人死于自杀,其中三分之二是上吊自杀。目的:分析 2001 年至 2020 年间自杀方式的变化趋势,探讨自杀方式与部分社会人口特征之间的关系。研究方法我们重点研究了占自杀总数 95.7% 的自杀方式。我们采用连接点回归法来研究各种自杀方式的自杀率变化,并采用多元逻辑回归分析法来研究与特定自杀方式相关的社会人口特征。结果显示除利器自杀、跳楼或躺在移动物体前自杀外,所有自杀方式的自杀率都出现了按性别分列的逐年下降。在使用枪支和跳楼或躺在移动物体前自杀方面,年龄具有显著的统计学意义,而在所有自杀方式中,性别具有显著的统计学意义。教育程度、婚姻状况、居住地区与各种自杀方式之间存在关联。局限性:研究结果可能因文化而异。结论:某些社会人口统计学特征似乎与自杀方式的选择有关。
{"title":"Suicide Methods in Slovenia - Characteristics andTime Trends 2001-2020.","authors":"Petra Mikolič, Matej Vinko, Nina Ropret, Saška Roškar","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000918","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000918","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Between 2001 and 2020, Slovenia lost 8,952 lives due to suicides, two thirds of them by hanging. <i>Aim:</i> To analyze trends in suicide methods between 2001 and 2020 and to explore relationships between suicide methods and selected sociodemographic characteristic. <i>Methods:</i> We focused on methods accounting for 95.7% of all suicides. We performed joinpoint regression to examine changes in suicide rates by respective methods and multivariate logistic regression analyses to study sociodemographics associated with specific suicide methods. <i>Results:</i> A gender-specific annual decrease in suicide rates was observed in all methods except for sharp objects and jumping or lying in front of a moving object. Age was statistically significant in the use of firearms and jumping or lying in front of a moving object, while gender was significant in all methods. Associations were found between education, marital status, region of residence, and various suicide methods. <i>Limitations:</i> The results are potentially culturally specific. <i>Conclusion:</i> Certain sociodemographics seem to be associated with the selection of the method.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10357961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1