Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101423
Zhangfan Cao , Steven Xianglong Chen , Ting Dong , Edward Lee
We examine the impact of climate change uncertainty on supply chain financing. We find that firms significantly curtail trade credit provision during periods of high climate change uncertainty. The cross-sectional variations of this effect with firm-specific factors such as vulnerability to climate change, asset redeployability, and pollution severity suggest that it is primarily driven by managerial anticipation of physical damage cost rather than regulatory cost that the uncertainty could incur. The moderation of this effect by exogenous regulatory interventions such as state-level staggered adoption of the Climate Change Adaptation Plans and the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act suggests that managerial concerns of such cost can be alleviated through the improvement of climate change preparation and external financing respectively. Overall, our study reveals that climate change undermines the financial resilience of the supply chain and provides timely policy implications for tackling climate change against the backdrop of the global supply chain crisis.
{"title":"Climate change uncertainty and supply chain financing","authors":"Zhangfan Cao , Steven Xianglong Chen , Ting Dong , Edward Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101423","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101423","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the impact of climate change uncertainty on supply chain financing. We find that firms significantly curtail trade credit provision during periods of high climate change uncertainty. The cross-sectional variations of this effect with firm-specific factors such as vulnerability to climate change, asset redeployability, and pollution severity suggest that it is primarily driven by managerial anticipation of physical damage cost rather than regulatory cost that the uncertainty could incur. The moderation of this effect by exogenous regulatory interventions such as state-level staggered adoption of the Climate Change Adaptation Plans and the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act suggests that managerial concerns of such cost can be alleviated through the improvement of climate change preparation and external financing respectively. Overall, our study reveals that climate change undermines the financial resilience of the supply chain and provides timely policy implications for tackling climate change against the backdrop of the global supply chain crisis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101423"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141412281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2023.101271
Marco Ghitti , Gianfranco Gianfrate , Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes , Marco Spinelli
With the growth of green bonds as an asset class, the certification of the actual climate footprint of projects financed with these bonds is gaining momentum among investors and policymakers. We investigate the informative content of Second Party Opinions (SPOs) issued by external reviewers who assess the quality of green bonds by collecting a global sample of over 1200 corporate green bonds and analyzing matching results for 336 of them. We show that the market assigns a premium to the green bonds with the best SPOs' valuation - namely, the “dark-” and “medium-” green bonds. However, in presence of a formal credit rating, SPO external reviews do not appear to incorporate distinctive information priced by the market. Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that stricter green investment regulations, like the adoption of the “EU Taxonomy,” produce a “fly-to-quality” effect that widens the spread between dark and lighter green bonds' returns. Responsible investors also appear to rely on the judgement of external reviewers when a formal credit rating is absent, and they have significantly higher stakes in the greener bonds. Overall, our results indicate that SPO external reviews can reduce information asymmetry between issuers and investors absent of a credit rating, but they are not informative for rated green bonds.
{"title":"What’s in a shade? The market relevance of green bonds’ external reviews","authors":"Marco Ghitti , Gianfranco Gianfrate , Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes , Marco Spinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101271","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101271","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the growth of green bonds<span> as an asset class, the certification of the actual climate footprint of projects financed with these bonds is gaining momentum among investors and policymakers. We investigate the informative content of Second Party Opinions (SPOs) issued by external reviewers who assess the quality of green bonds by collecting a global sample of over 1200 corporate green bonds and analyzing matching results for 336 of them. We show that the market assigns a premium to the green bonds with the best SPOs' valuation - namely, the “dark-” and “medium-” green bonds. However, in presence of a formal credit rating, SPO external reviews do not appear to incorporate distinctive information priced by the market. Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that stricter green investment regulations, like the adoption of the “EU Taxonomy,” produce a “fly-to-quality” effect that widens the spread between dark and lighter green bonds' returns. Responsible investors also appear to rely on the judgement of external reviewers when a formal credit rating is absent, and they have significantly higher stakes in the greener bonds. Overall, our results indicate that SPO external reviews can reduce information asymmetry between issuers and investors absent of a credit rating, but they are not informative for rated green bonds.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101271"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136160183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101450
Greg Tindall
To date, the literature has not discovered diversification to be a firm policy that shareholders can influence through their proposals at annual meetings but has explained contexts in which diversification can defend. I contemplate and test diversifying responses to shareholder proposals made in the context of climate change. By following 440 shareholder-initiated proposals in the United States that contain “climate change” – from the first instance in the 1994 proxy season until 2020 – I find that firms in receipt of such proposals diversify more, mostly into related industries. Further, diversification prompted by climate proposals generally leads to wealth enhancements. Beyond correlations and the main results of ordinary least squares regressions, I address the endogenous nature of corporate policies in a variety of ways: a matching estimator, fixed effects, and an instrumental variable, along with a placebo and a GMM estimator. Robustness tests confirm prior results and expose a subtle difference between sales and asset diversification. Climate-related proposals appear to influence sales diversification slightly more than asset diversification, suggesting that agents may be less responsive to owner concerns than customers. Overall, shareholder proposals related to climate change can have the real effect of prompting firms to diversify.
{"title":"A real effect of climate-related shareholder proposals: Diversification","authors":"Greg Tindall","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101450","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101450","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>To date, the literature has not discovered diversification to be a firm policy that shareholders can influence through their proposals at annual meetings but has explained contexts in which diversification can defend. I contemplate and test diversifying responses to shareholder proposals made in the context of climate change. By following 440 shareholder-initiated proposals in the United States that contain “climate change” – from the first instance in the 1994 proxy season until 2020 – I find that firms in receipt of such proposals diversify more, mostly into related industries. Further, diversification prompted by climate proposals generally leads to </span>wealth<span> enhancements. Beyond correlations and the main results of ordinary least squares regressions, I address the endogenous nature of corporate policies in a variety of ways: a matching estimator, fixed effects, and an </span></span>instrumental variable, along with a placebo and a GMM estimator. Robustness tests confirm prior results and expose a subtle difference between sales and asset diversification. Climate-related proposals appear to influence sales diversification slightly more than asset diversification, suggesting that agents may be less responsive to owner concerns than customers. Overall, shareholder proposals related to climate change can have the real effect of prompting firms to diversify.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101450"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141910572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101697
Lingxia Sun , Yanlin Bao , Jongmoo Jay Choi , Hoje Jo
Since climate change and environmental challenges are global in nature, one would expect MNCs to exhibit greater alignment with global environmental sustainability than domestic firms, given their exposure to international norms and stakeholder concerns. A counterargument is that MNCs might instead behave opportunistically, engaging in regulatory arbitrage related to emissions reduction by leveraging their global networks. Using a sample of 11,477 unique firms from 63 countries over the period of 2002–2022, we find that both the magnitude of carbon emissions and the quality of emissions disclosure are positively associated with firm internationalization. Additionally, U.S.-based MNCs that generate sales in civil law countries and regions tend to disclose more emissions information. Furthermore, the relationship between firm internationalization and emissions reduction is moderated by international environmental institutions, such as the Kyoto Protocol. Finally, we find that MNCs are rewarded by a broader stakeholder community for their efforts in reducing emissions. Overall, the results support the new institutionalism theory, suggesting that MNCs’ emissions reduction is perceived as alignment with global environmental norms.
{"title":"Firm internationalization and emissions Reduction: International evidence","authors":"Lingxia Sun , Yanlin Bao , Jongmoo Jay Choi , Hoje Jo","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101697","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101697","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>Since climate change and environmental challenges are global in nature, one would expect </span>MNCs<span><span> to exhibit greater alignment with global environmental sustainability than domestic firms, given their exposure to international norms and stakeholder concerns. A counterargument is that </span>MNCs<span> might instead behave opportunistically, engaging in regulatory arbitrage related to emissions reduction by leveraging their global networks. Using a sample of 11,477 unique firms from 63 countries over the period of 2002–2022, we find that both the magnitude of carbon emissions<span> and the quality of emissions disclosure are positively associated with firm internationalization<span><span>. Additionally, U.S.-based MNCs<span> that generate sales in civil law countries and regions tend to disclose more emissions information. Furthermore, the relationship between firm internationalization and emissions reduction is moderated by international environmental institutions, such as the </span></span>Kyoto Protocol. Finally, we find that MNCs are rewarded by a broader stakeholder community for their efforts in reducing emissions. Overall, the results support the new institutionalism theory, suggesting that MNCs’ emissions reduction is perceived as alignment with global environmental norms.</span></span></span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101697"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144621791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101368
Xutang Liu , Sabri Boubaker , Jing Liao , Shouyu Yao
This study assesses the effect of common state ownership on corporate environmental performance. Using a large sample of Chinese listed firms, we find that state-owned common ownership leads to significantly enhanced corporate environmental performance. Our mechanism analysis indicates that state-owned common owners promote environmental-friendly practices through resource allocation mechanisms that alleviate corporate financial constraints. In addition, these owners play a leadership role in fostering corporate green innovation and enhancing the overall performance of the industry. Specifically, common state ownership leads to higher industry's green total factor productivity and profitability. Moreover, we observe that the positive relationship between common state ownership and corporate environmental performance is more pronounced in firms without politically connected CEOs/chairpersons and in privately owned firms.
{"title":"The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance","authors":"Xutang Liu , Sabri Boubaker , Jing Liao , Shouyu Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101368","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101368","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>This study assesses the effect of common state ownership on corporate environmental performance. Using a large sample of Chinese listed firms, we find that state-owned common ownership leads to significantly enhanced corporate environmental performance. Our mechanism analysis indicates that state-owned common owners promote environmental-friendly practices through </span>resource allocation<span> mechanisms that alleviate corporate financial constraints. In addition, these owners play a leadership role in fostering corporate green innovation and enhancing the overall performance of the industry<span>. Specifically, common state ownership leads to higher industry's green total factor productivity and profitability. Moreover, we observe that the positive relationship between common state ownership and corporate environmental performance is more pronounced in firms without politically connected CEOs/chairpersons and in privately owned firms.</span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101368"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140282264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101540
Xiaoqian Liu , Javier Cifuentes-Faura , Chang'an Wang , Long Wang
The construction of pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation (PZGFRI) is China's regional exploration aimed at increasing financial support for green transformation and development. However, its impact on corporate carbon emission governance is uncertain. This paper examines the impact of the PZGFRI policy on corporate carbon emissions (CCEs) and its mechanisms based on the difference-in-differences model. The results indicate that this PZGFRI policy notably reduces the carbon emissions of enterprises in the pilot regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that this green finance policy reduces CCEs via alleviating corporate financing constraints, promoting corporate green innovation and corporate ESG performance. Heterogeneity results show that this negative impact is more pronounced for non-SOEs than SOEs. Furthermore, the PZGFRI policy dramatically reduces the carbon emissions of enterprises with short-sighted managers, while having insignificant performance on those with long-sighted management. Moreover, carbon reduction effect is notable for high-carbon industry enterprises, and this impact is insignificant for non-high carbon emission industry enterprises. Additionally, this policy has a prominent carbon reduction influence on enterprises in eastern and central regions, but its effect is minimal for those in western regions. This paper provides empirical evidence for other countries to implement green finance policies to promote low-carbon transformation development.
{"title":"Can green finance policy reduce corporate carbon emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China","authors":"Xiaoqian Liu , Javier Cifuentes-Faura , Chang'an Wang , Long Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101540","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101540","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>The construction of pilot zones for green </span>finance<span> reform and innovation (PZGFRI) is China's regional exploration aimed at increasing financial support for green transformation and development. However, its impact on corporate carbon emission<span><span> governance is uncertain. This paper examines the impact of the PZGFRI policy on corporate carbon emissions (CCEs) and its mechanisms based on the difference-in-differences model. The results indicate that this PZGFRI policy notably reduces the carbon emissions of enterprises in the pilot regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that this green finance policy reduces CCEs via alleviating corporate financing constraints, promoting corporate green innovation and corporate </span>ESG performance<span>. Heterogeneity results show that this negative impact is more pronounced for non-SOEs than SOEs. Furthermore, the PZGFRI policy dramatically reduces the carbon emissions of enterprises with short-sighted managers, while having insignificant performance on those with long-sighted management. Moreover, carbon reduction effect is notable for high-carbon industry enterprises, and this impact is insignificant for non-high carbon emission industry enterprises. Additionally, this policy has a prominent carbon reduction influence on enterprises in eastern and central regions, but its effect is minimal for those in western regions. This paper provides empirical evidence for other countries to implement green finance policies to promote low-carbon transformation development.</span></span></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101540"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145247985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101699
Wenquan Li , Suman Neupane , Kelvin Jui Keng Tan
This paper examines the relationship between corporate culture and firms’ environmental policies. We find that a strong corporate culture is associated with lower toxic emission levels and reduced pollution intensity. These reductions are genuine and not the result of “greenwashing,” as these firms mitigate harmful toxic releases without selectively targeting specific environmental regulations. The primary cultural values associated with the reduction in toxic emissions include teamwork, innovation, respect, and integrity. To alleviate potential endogeneity concerns, we exploit a quasi-natural experiment based on the forced departures of CEOs due to the sudden public exposure of legal violations or concerns. We also employ a propensity score matching approach and use alternative measures of firms’ environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that diversity and research and development (R&D) expenses are among the potential channels through which this effect occurs. Importantly, the reduction in firms’ toxic releases does not come at the expense of production. Finally, the negative relationship between corporate culture and firm pollution is concentrated in plants located outside the headquarters’ state and in counties with nonattainment status.
{"title":"Environmental externalities of corporate culture: Evidence from firm pollution","authors":"Wenquan Li , Suman Neupane , Kelvin Jui Keng Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101699","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101699","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the relationship between corporate culture and firms’ environmental policies. We find that a strong corporate culture is associated with lower toxic emission levels and reduced pollution intensity. These reductions are genuine and not the result of “greenwashing,” as these firms mitigate harmful toxic releases without selectively targeting specific environmental regulations. The primary cultural values associated with the reduction in toxic emissions include teamwork, innovation, respect, and integrity. To alleviate potential endogeneity concerns, we exploit a quasi-natural experiment based on the forced departures of CEOs due to the sudden public exposure of legal violations or concerns. We also employ a propensity score matching approach and use alternative measures of firms’ environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that diversity and research and development (R&D) expenses are among the potential channels through which this effect occurs. Importantly, the reduction in firms’ toxic releases does not come at the expense of production. Finally, the negative relationship between corporate culture and firm pollution is concentrated in plants located outside the headquarters’ state and in counties with nonattainment status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101699"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144621786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101698
Zinat Alam , Miran Hossain , Lingling Wang
We use the house transaction data to analyze why houses with energy-saving (green) features are sold for higher prices. We estimate house-specific economic values of green features and show that these values account for about 20–53 % of the green price premium, depending on how economic values are measured. Individual homebuyers' cultural origins and environmental attitudes also play a significant role in explaining the green price premium, with a weaker premium observed among less individualistic and indulgent buyers, and a stronger premium among those who are more uncertainty-avoidant and pro-environment. These results are robust to various strategies to address selection bias and cannot be explained by buyers' income levels or political orientations. Our findings point to both the economic and social value of green homes and highlight the role of investors’ behavioral preferences in evaluating green investments.
{"title":"The economic and cultural motives of green price premium","authors":"Zinat Alam , Miran Hossain , Lingling Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101698","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101698","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We use the house transaction data to analyze why houses with energy-saving (green) features are sold for higher prices. We estimate <em>house-specific</em> economic values of green features and show that these values account for about 20–53 % of the green price premium, depending on how economic values are measured. Individual homebuyers' cultural origins and environmental attitudes also play a significant role in explaining the green price premium, with a weaker premium observed among less individualistic and indulgent buyers, and a stronger premium among those who are more uncertainty-avoidant and pro-environment. These results are robust to various strategies to address selection bias and cannot be explained by buyers' income levels or political orientations. Our findings point to both the economic and social value of green homes and highlight the role of investors’ behavioral preferences in evaluating green investments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101698"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144621789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Over recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the costs to the environment of corporate actions. We posit that accounting comparability between a firm and its peers, facilitates firm learning of the impact peer firm activities have on the environment. This learning allows the firm to reduce its own environmental violations. In line with this conjecture, our findings show that accounting comparability is negatively associated with environmental violations. Further, the reduction in firm environmental violations is larger in the presence of comparable peer firms disclosing low toxic releases, suggesting that firms are better able to learn from peer firms with low environmental impact. Our results provide novel evidence that accounting comparability facilitates green learning and therefore benefits society at large by reducing environmental harm.
{"title":"Learning to be green: Accounting comparability and environmental violations","authors":"Justin Chircop , Monika Tarsalewska , Agnieszka Trzeciakiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101240","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2023.101240","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the costs to the environment of corporate actions. We posit that accounting comparability between a firm and its peers, facilitates firm learning of the impact peer firm activities have on the environment. This learning allows the firm to reduce its own environmental violations. In line with this conjecture, our findings show that accounting comparability is negatively associated with environmental violations. Further, the reduction in firm environmental violations is larger in the presence of comparable peer firms disclosing low toxic releases, suggesting that firms are better able to learn from peer firms with low environmental impact. Our results provide novel evidence that accounting comparability facilitates green learning and therefore benefits society at large by reducing environmental harm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101240"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44162118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101438
Anastasia Kopita , Zacharias Petrou
We examine the relationship between analysts' task-specific experience in the context of ESG information and the informativeness of their stock recommendation revisions. While sell-side analysts incorporate ESG information in their valuation process and research reports, previous studies have indicated that the increased availability of ESG information in the market poses challenges for analysts to issue incrementally informative reports. Building upon existing literature that highlights systematic differences in analysts' performance that is attributed to their experience, we introduce a measure of financial analysts' ESG experience. We document a positive association between our proxy of analyst ESG experience and market reactions to their recommendation revisions. Our findings also show that analysts' ESG experience contributes to the interpretation of information included in firm ESG reports. We further find support for a stronger association between the market reaction and our ESG-experience proxy when firms exhibit lower levels of ESG disclosure and when they face higher external scrutiny due to their exposure to ESG-related risks. Our results are robust when considering analysts' innate and forecasting ability and when additional specifications are applied.
{"title":"Does analyst ESG experience matter?","authors":"Anastasia Kopita , Zacharias Petrou","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101438","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101438","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the relationship between analysts' task-specific experience in the context of ESG information and the informativeness of their stock recommendation revisions. While sell-side analysts incorporate ESG information in their valuation process and research reports, previous studies have indicated that the increased availability of ESG information in the market poses challenges for analysts to issue incrementally informative reports. Building upon existing literature that highlights systematic differences in analysts' performance that is attributed to their experience, we introduce a measure of financial analysts' ESG experience. We document a positive association between our proxy of analyst ESG experience and market reactions to their recommendation revisions. Our findings also show that analysts' ESG experience contributes to the interpretation of information included in firm ESG reports. We further find support for a stronger association between the market reaction and our ESG-experience proxy when firms exhibit lower levels of ESG disclosure and when they face higher external scrutiny due to their exposure to ESG-related risks. Our results are robust when considering analysts' innate and forecasting ability and when additional specifications are applied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":"57 5","pages":"Article 101438"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141783766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}