首页 > 最新文献

Womens Health Issues最新文献

英文 中文
“A Lot of My Friends Don't Know How It Works”: Student Activists Describe Gaps in College Students' Emergency Contraception Knowledge "我的很多朋友都不知道它是如何起作用的":学生积极分子描述大学生在紧急避孕知识方面的差距
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.07.002
Brandon Wagner PhD , Nicola Brogan MSc, RN , Kelly Cleland MPA, MPH

Introduction

Despite the high potential need for emergency contraception (EC) among college students, lack of accurate knowledge may decrease the likelihood of its use in this population. We examined knowledge about EC methods, potential outcomes of use, and access among college students in the United States.

Methods

We recruited college students from a listserv devoted to EC campus activism for an online survey about EC knowledge (N = 150) and conducted 24 follow-up in-depth interviews. We describe the share of respondents that correctly answered each question and provide additional context and insight from interview respondents.

Results

Gaps in EC knowledge were noted in our sample of college student EC activists. Awareness of different methods of EC was not universal; 38% of the sample was unaware of ulipristal acetate (ella®) and 61% was unaware of the intrauterine device inserted after intercourse as EC. Many respondents also incorrectly perceived additional barriers to acquiring EC such as minimum age or an ID requirement to purchase EC (64% and 49%, respectively). Interview respondents describe how medical providers, such as student health services and pharmacists, can pose barriers to EC access through either their actions or how college students expect they will act.

Conclusions

We document several gaps in knowledge surrounding EC in college students, even in an activist sample. Additional efforts to inform students about the variety of available EC methods and address mistaken perceptions about barriers to access may allow college students to better meet their needs for EC.

尽管大学生对紧急避孕(EC)的潜在需求很高,但缺乏准确的知识可能会降低其在该人群中使用的可能性。我们调查了美国大学生关于电子商务方法的知识、使用的潜在结果和获取途径。方法从一个致力于电子商务校园行动的名单中招募大学生进行电子商务知识的在线调查(N = 150),并进行24次后续深度访谈。我们描述了正确回答每个问题的受访者的比例,并提供了采访受访者的额外背景和见解。结果在我们的大学生社团积极分子样本中发现了社团知识的差距。对电子商务不同方法的认识并不普遍;38%的样本不知道醋酸乌普利司妥(ella®),61%的样本不知道性交后插入宫内节育器作为EC。许多受访者还错误地认为获得电子烟还有其他障碍,例如购买电子烟的最低年龄或身份证要求(分别为64%和49%)。受访者描述了医疗服务提供者,如学生保健服务和药剂师,如何通过他们的行为或大学生期望他们将如何采取行动,对电子商务的获取构成障碍。结论:我们记录了大学生在电子商务方面的一些知识差距,即使在积极分子样本中也是如此。额外的努力告知学生各种可用的电子商务方法,并解决对获取障碍的错误看法,可能会使大学生更好地满足他们对电子商务的需求。
{"title":"“A Lot of My Friends Don't Know How It Works”: Student Activists Describe Gaps in College Students' Emergency Contraception Knowledge","authors":"Brandon Wagner PhD ,&nbsp;Nicola Brogan MSc, RN ,&nbsp;Kelly Cleland MPA, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the high potential need for emergency contraception (EC) among college students, lack of accurate knowledge may decrease the likelihood of its use in this population. We examined knowledge about EC methods, potential outcomes of use, and access among college students in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited college students from a listserv devoted to EC campus activism for an online survey about EC knowledge (<em>N</em> = 150) and conducted 24 follow-up in-depth interviews. We describe the share of respondents that correctly answered each question and provide additional context and insight from interview respondents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Gaps in EC knowledge were noted in our sample of college student EC activists. Awareness of different methods of EC was not universal; 38% of the sample was unaware of ulipristal acetate (ella®) and 61% was unaware of the intrauterine device inserted after intercourse as EC. Many respondents also incorrectly perceived additional barriers to acquiring EC such as minimum age or an ID requirement to purchase EC (64% and 49%, respectively). Interview respondents describe how medical providers, such as student health services and pharmacists, can pose barriers to EC access through either their actions or how college students expect they will act.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We document several gaps in knowledge surrounding EC in college students, even in an activist sample. Additional efforts to inform students about the variety of available EC methods and address mistaken perceptions about barriers to access may allow college students to better meet their needs for EC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001305/pdfft?md5=955a58714d88e304eec1ac7237b86f1b&pid=1-s2.0-S1049386723001305-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10326995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Separating Procedure-related Fears From Future Fertility Concerns Among a Cohort Seeking Abortion Information Online 将在线寻求人工流产信息的人群中与手术相关的恐惧与对未来生育的担忧区分开来
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.004
Alice F. Cartwright PhD, MPH , Suzanne O. Bell PhD, MPH , Ushma D. Upadhyay PhD, MPH

Introduction

The general public and abortion patients in the United States have misinformation about the risks of infertility associated with abortion, which may influence abortion care-seeking.

Methods

The Google Ads Abortion Access Study was a national study of people considering abortion and searching online for information. Participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys, providing free text responses to questions about barriers and facilitators to abortion. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the free text responses related to fertility and used thematic analysis to identify concerns raised about links between abortion and future fertility.

Results

Of 864 participants who provided free text responses in the follow-up survey, 32 specifically mentioned fertility. Few expressed fear that complications from the abortion procedure would somehow lead to infertility; rather, most discussed complex and overlapping thoughts about how abortion factored into their reproductive life plans. These included age-related concerns, missing out on their “chance” to have a child, fear of being punished by God with infertility for having an abortion, and conflicting emotions if they had previously been told they were subfecund or infertile.

Conclusion

Although previous research has focused on misinformation about the link between abortion and infertility, participants in this study rarely mentioned it as a concern. Researchers and practitioners should be attuned to the distinctions people make between infertility occurring as a result of abortion and other fears they might have about not achieving their future reproductive aspirations, ask questions, and provide counseling accordingly.

在美国,公众和流产患者对流产相关的不孕风险有错误的认识,这可能会影响流产护理的寻求。方法“谷歌广告堕胎渠道研究”是一项针对考虑堕胎并在网上搜索相关信息的人的全国性研究。参与者完成了基线和后续调查,提供免费文本回答有关堕胎障碍和促进因素的问题。我们对与生育有关的自由文本回应进行了探索性分析,并使用主题分析来确定人们对堕胎与未来生育之间联系的担忧。结果在后续调查中,864名提供免费文本回复的参与者中,有32人特别提到了生育能力。很少有人表示担心堕胎手术的并发症会以某种方式导致不孕;相反,大多数人讨论了关于堕胎如何影响他们的生育计划的复杂和重叠的想法。其中包括与年龄有关的担忧,错过了生孩子的“机会”,害怕因堕胎而被上帝惩罚为不孕,以及如果他们之前被告知不孕或不育,他们的矛盾情绪。尽管之前的研究集中在关于流产和不孕症之间联系的错误信息上,但这项研究的参与者很少提到这一点。研究人员和从业者应该了解人们对堕胎导致的不孕症和他们可能对无法实现未来生育愿望的其他恐惧之间的区别,提出问题,并提供相应的咨询。
{"title":"Separating Procedure-related Fears From Future Fertility Concerns Among a Cohort Seeking Abortion Information Online","authors":"Alice F. Cartwright PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Suzanne O. Bell PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ushma D. Upadhyay PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The general public and abortion patients in the United States have misinformation about the risks of infertility associated with abortion, which may influence abortion care-seeking.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Google Ads Abortion Access Study was a national study of people considering abortion and searching online for information. Participants completed baseline and follow-up surveys, providing free text responses to questions about barriers and facilitators to abortion. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the free text responses related to fertility and used thematic analysis to identify concerns raised about links between abortion and future fertility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 864 participants who provided free text responses in the follow-up survey, 32 specifically mentioned fertility. Few expressed fear that complications from the abortion procedure would somehow lead to infertility; rather, most discussed complex and overlapping thoughts about how abortion factored into their reproductive life plans. These included age-related concerns, missing out on their “chance” to have a child, fear of being punished by God with infertility for having an abortion, and conflicting emotions if they had previously been told they were subfecund or infertile.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although previous research has focused on misinformation about the link between abortion and infertility, participants in this study rarely mentioned it as a concern. Researchers and practitioners should be attuned to the distinctions people make between infertility occurring as a result of abortion and other fears they might have about not achieving their future reproductive aspirations, ask questions, and provide counseling accordingly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001214/pdfft?md5=74aee14fea85ec4b3db7ccaf7a2a0cf7&pid=1-s2.0-S1049386723001214-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9996436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Agenda for Improving Research and Care 有智力和发育障碍妇女的乳腺癌和卵巢癌:改善研究和护理的议程
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.001
Kate E. Dibble PhD , Tara M. Lutz PhD, MPH, MCHES , Avonne E. Connor PhD, MPH , Mary Beth Bruder PhD
{"title":"Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Agenda for Improving Research and Care","authors":"Kate E. Dibble PhD ,&nbsp;Tara M. Lutz PhD, MPH, MCHES ,&nbsp;Avonne E. Connor PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Mary Beth Bruder PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001184/pdfft?md5=fbb7515ffd3e2fd459ed76895dfa8433&pid=1-s2.0-S1049386723001184-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9761056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rebuilding a Reproductive Future Informed by Disability and Reproductive Justice 重建残疾和生殖正义的生殖未来
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.006
Asha Hassan MPH , Alanna E. Hirz MSPH , Lindsey Yates PhD, MPH , Anna K. Hing PhD, MPH
{"title":"Rebuilding a Reproductive Future Informed by Disability and Reproductive Justice","authors":"Asha Hassan MPH ,&nbsp;Alanna E. Hirz MSPH ,&nbsp;Lindsey Yates PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Anna K. Hing PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10108703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Corrigendum to: Implementation of State Laws Giving Pregnant People Priority Access to Drug Treatment Programs in the Context of Coexisting Punitive Laws [Women’ Health Issues 33 (2023) 117–125] 在惩罚性法律并存的情况下,实施给予孕妇优先获得药物治疗方案的州法律[妇女健康问题33(2023)117-125]的更正
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.05.006
Sarah A. White MSPH , Alexander McCourt JD, PhD , Sachini Bandara PhD , Daisy J. Goodman CND, MPH, CNM , Esita Patel PhD, RN , Emma E. McGinty PhD
{"title":"Corrigendum to: Implementation of State Laws Giving Pregnant People Priority Access to Drug Treatment Programs in the Context of Coexisting Punitive Laws [Women’ Health Issues 33 (2023) 117–125]","authors":"Sarah A. White MSPH ,&nbsp;Alexander McCourt JD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sachini Bandara PhD ,&nbsp;Daisy J. Goodman CND, MPH, CNM ,&nbsp;Esita Patel PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Emma E. McGinty PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.05.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.05.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9735102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abortion Bans Will Exacerbate Already Severe Racial Inequities in Maternal Mortality 堕胎禁令将加剧本已严重的孕产妇死亡率种族不平等
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.007
Kelly M. Treder MD, MPH , Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha PhD, MPH , Katharine O. White MD, MPH
{"title":"Abortion Bans Will Exacerbate Already Severe Racial Inequities in Maternal Mortality","authors":"Kelly M. Treder MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Katharine O. White MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9750649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic 关于寨卡病毒的声音:在不断演变的流行病中生殖自主和共同决策
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005
Paula Latortue-Albino MD , Stephanie Delgado MD , Rebecca Perkins MD, MSc , Christina Yarrington MD , Pooja Mehta MD, MSHP

Introduction

We aimed to understand the degree to which pregnant individuals exposed to emerging infections, such as Zika, are engaged by providers in shared decision-making and explore potential barriers to inform strategies to improve care for those most at risk for inequities. Studies have demonstrated that Latinx and Black people are less likely to engage in shared decision-making and are less engaged by providers. Limited research explores factors impacting shared decision-making in prenatal care and in the setting of recent epidemics.

Methods

We conducted an exploratory qualitative study of individuals eligible for prenatal screening owing to Zika exposure during pregnancy. Given an established connection between autonomy and shared decision-making, we used the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the Three Talk Model for shared decision-making to inform our semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. and participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center and a tertiary care obstetric clinic until thematic saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed and two coders used modified grounded theory to generate themes.

Results

We interviewed 18 participants from May to December 2017. Participant narratives demonstrated reproductive autonomy in pregnancy decision-making, with decision support from families, fatalism in pregnancy planning, and limited engagement by providers around decisions and implications of Zika virus testing. Hierarchy in provider dynamics, perceived stigma around emigration and travel, and language barriers impacted participant engagement in shared decision-making.

Conclusions

Participants demonstrated personal autonomy in reproductive decision-making, but demonstrated limited engagement in shared decision-making with regard to prenatal Zika testing. Provider promotion of shared decision-making using culturally centered decision tools to elicit underlying beliefs and deepen context for option, choice, and decision talk is critical in prenatal counseling to support equitable outcomes during evolving pandemics.

引言我们旨在了解提供者在多大程度上参与共同决策,接触寨卡病毒等新发感染的孕妇,并探索潜在的障碍,为改善对最有可能出现不公平现象的人的护理提供策略。研究表明,拉丁裔和黑人不太可能参与共同决策,提供者也不太参与。有限的研究探讨了影响产前护理和近期流行病背景下共同决策的因素。方法我们对因妊娠期间接触寨卡病毒而符合产前筛查条件的个体进行了探索性定性研究。考虑到自主性和共享决策之间的既定联系,我们使用生殖自主性量表和共享决策的三语模型来为我们的半结构化访谈指南提供信息。访谈以西班牙语或英语进行。参与者是从联邦合格的卫生中心和三级护理产科诊所招募的,直到主题饱和。访谈被记录、翻译和转录,两名编码人员使用改良的基础理论来生成主题。结果2017年5月至12月,我们采访了18名参与者。参与者的叙述表明,在家庭的决策支持下,怀孕计划中的宿命论,以及提供者对寨卡病毒检测的决策和影响的有限参与下,怀孕决策中的生育自主性。提供者动态的层次结构、移民和旅行带来的耻辱感以及语言障碍影响了参与者参与共同决策。结论参与者在生殖决策中表现出个人自主性,但在产前寨卡病毒检测方面参与共同决策的程度有限。提供者使用以文化为中心的决策工具促进共同决策,以引出潜在的信念,并加深选择、选择和决策谈话的背景,这在产前咨询中至关重要,以支持在不断演变的流行病期间取得公平的结果。
{"title":"Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic","authors":"Paula Latortue-Albino MD ,&nbsp;Stephanie Delgado MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Perkins MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Christina Yarrington MD ,&nbsp;Pooja Mehta MD, MSHP","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We aimed to understand the degree to which pregnant individuals exposed to emerging infections, such as Zika, are engaged by providers in shared decision-making and explore potential barriers to inform strategies to improve care for those most at risk for inequities. Studies have demonstrated that Latinx and Black people are less likely to engage in shared decision-making and are less engaged by providers. Limited research explores factors impacting shared decision-making in prenatal care and in the setting of recent epidemics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We conducted an<span><span> exploratory qualitative study of individuals eligible for </span>prenatal screening owing to Zika exposure during pregnancy. Given an established connection between </span></span>autonomy<span><span><span> and shared decision-making, we used the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the Three Talk Model for shared decision-making to inform our semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. and participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center and a tertiary care </span>obstetric clinic until thematic saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed and two coders used modified </span>grounded theory to generate themes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We interviewed 18 participants from May to December 2017. Participant narratives demonstrated reproductive autonomy in pregnancy decision-making, with decision support from families, fatalism in pregnancy planning, and limited engagement by providers around decisions and implications of Zika virus testing. Hierarchy in provider dynamics, perceived stigma around emigration and travel, and language barriers impacted participant engagement in shared decision-making.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants demonstrated personal autonomy in reproductive decision-making, but demonstrated limited engagement in shared decision-making with regard to prenatal Zika testing. Provider promotion of shared decision-making using culturally centered decision tools to elicit underlying beliefs and deepen context for option, choice, and decision talk is critical in prenatal counseling to support equitable outcomes during evolving pandemics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9804232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Green Space, and Walkability and Risk for Falls Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative 绝经后妇女的社区社会经济地位、绿地、步行性和跌倒风险:妇女健康倡议
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.009
Marilyn E. Wende PhD, MSPH , Matthew C. Lohman PhD , Daniela B. Friedman PhD , Alexander C. McLain PhD , Michael J. LaMonte PhD, MPH , Eric A. Whitsel MD, MPH , Aladdin H. Shadyab PhD, MPH, MS , Lorena Garcia DrPH, MPH , Benjamin W. Chrisinger PhD , Kathy Pan MD , Chloe E. Bird PhD, MA , Gloria E. Sarto MD , Andrew T. Kaczynski PhD

Purpose

This study estimated associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES), walkability, green space, and incident falls among postmenopausal women and evaluated modifiers of these associations, including study arm, race and ethnicity, baseline household income, baseline walking, age at enrollment, baseline low physical functioning, baseline fall history, climate region, and urban–rural residence.

Methods

The Women's Health Initiative recruited a national sample of postmenopausal women (50–79 years) across 40 U.S. clinical centers and conducted yearly assessments from 1993 to 2005 (n = 161,808). Women reporting a history of hip fracture or walking limitations were excluded, yielding a final sample of 157,583 participants. Falling was reported annually. NSES (income/wealth, education, occupation), walkability (population density, diversity of land cover, nearby high-traffic roadways), and green space (exposure to vegetation) were calculated annually and categorized into tertiles (low, intermediate, high). Generalized estimating equations assessed longitudinal relationships.

Results

NSES was associated with falling before adjustment (high vs. low, odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.01). Walkability was significantly associated with falls after adjustment (high vs. low, odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98–0.99). Green space was not associated with falling before or after adjustment. Study arm, race and ethnicity, household income, age, low physical functioning, fall history, and climate region modified the relationship between NSES and falling. Race and ethnicity, age, fall history, and climate region modified relationships between walkability and green space and falling.

Conclusions

Our results did not show strong associations of NSES, walkability, or green space with falling. Future research should incorporate granular environmental measures that may directly relate to physical activity and outdoor engagement.

目的本研究估计了绝经后妇女的社区社会经济地位(NSES)、可步行性、绿地和意外跌倒之间的相关性,并评估了这些相关性的修正值,包括研究组、种族和民族、基线家庭收入、基线步行、入组年龄、基线低身体功能、基线跌倒史、气候区域,以及城乡住宅。方法妇女健康倡议组织招募了40个美国临床中心的绝经后妇女(50-79岁)的全国样本,并从1993年到2005年进行了年度评估(n=161808)。报告有髋部骨折或行走受限史的女性被排除在外,最终样本为157583名参与者。每年都有下降的报道。每年计算NSES(收入/财富、教育、职业)、可步行性(人口密度、土地覆盖多样性、附近交通繁忙的道路)和绿地(植被暴露),并将其分为三类(低、中、高)。广义估计方程评估了纵向关系。结果NSES与调整前跌倒有关(高与低,比值比为1.01;95%置信区间为1.00-1.01)。步行能力与调整后跌倒显著相关(高与高,比值比0.99;95%可信区间为0.98-0.99)。绿地与调整前或调整后跌倒无关。研究组、种族和民族、家庭收入、年龄、身体机能低下、跌倒史和气候地区改变了NSES与跌倒之间的关系。种族和民族、年龄、秋季历史和气候区域改变了可步行性、绿地和秋季之间的关系。结论我们的研究结果没有显示NSES、可步行性或绿地与跌倒有很强的相关性。未来的研究应该包括可能与体育活动和户外活动直接相关的精细环境措施。
{"title":"Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, Green Space, and Walkability and Risk for Falls Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative","authors":"Marilyn E. Wende PhD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Lohman PhD ,&nbsp;Daniela B. Friedman PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander C. McLain PhD ,&nbsp;Michael J. LaMonte PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Eric A. Whitsel MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Aladdin H. Shadyab PhD, MPH, MS ,&nbsp;Lorena Garcia DrPH, MPH ,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Chrisinger PhD ,&nbsp;Kathy Pan MD ,&nbsp;Chloe E. Bird PhD, MA ,&nbsp;Gloria E. Sarto MD ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Kaczynski PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study estimated associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES), walkability, green space, and incident falls among postmenopausal women and evaluated modifiers of these associations, including study arm, race and ethnicity, baseline household income, baseline walking, age at enrollment, baseline low physical functioning, baseline fall history, climate region, and urban–rural residence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The Women's Health Initiative recruited a national sample of postmenopausal women (50–79 years) across 40 U.S. clinical centers and conducted yearly assessments from 1993 to 2005 (</span><em>n</em><span> = 161,808). Women reporting a history of hip fracture or walking limitations were excluded, yielding a final sample of 157,583 participants. Falling was reported annually. NSES (income/wealth, education, occupation), walkability (population density, diversity of land cover, nearby high-traffic roadways), and green space (exposure to vegetation) were calculated annually and categorized into tertiles (low, intermediate, high). Generalized estimating equations assessed longitudinal relationships.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>NSES was associated with falling before adjustment (high vs. low, odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.01). Walkability was significantly associated with falls after adjustment (high vs. low, odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98–0.99). Green space was not associated with falling before or after adjustment. Study arm, race and ethnicity, household income, age, low physical functioning, fall history, and climate region modified the relationship between NSES and falling. Race and ethnicity, age, fall history, and climate region modified relationships between walkability and green space and falling.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results did not show strong associations of NSES, walkability, or green space with falling. Future research should incorporate granular environmental measures that may directly relate to physical activity and outdoor engagement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330171/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9763294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in Use of Fertility Treatment Between People With Medicaid and Private Health Insurance Coverage in the United States 美国医疗补助和私人医疗保险人群使用生育治疗的差异
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.003
Erica L. Eliason PhD , Marie E. Thoma PhD , Maria W. Steenland SD

Objectives

We aimed to compare differences in receipt of any and specific types of fertility services between people with Medicaid and private insurance.

Methods

We used National Survey of Family Growth (2002–2019) data and linear probability regression models to examine the association between insurance type (Medicaid or private) and fertility service use. The primary outcome was use of fertility services in the past 12 months, and secondary outcomes were use of specific types of fertility services at any time: 1) testing, 2) common medical treatment, and 3) use of any fertility treatment type (testing, medical treatment, or surgical treatment of infertility). We additionally calculated time-to-pregnancy using a method that estimates the unobserved total amount of time the respondent spent trying to become pregnant using their current duration of pregnancy attempt at the time of the survey. We calculated time-to-pregnancy ratios across respondent characteristics to examine if insurance type was associated with differential time-to-pregnancy.

Results

In adjusted models, Medicaid coverage was associated with an 11.2-percentage point (95% confidence interval: −22.3 to −0.0) lower use of fertility services in the past 12 months compared with private coverage. Relative to private coverage, Medicaid insurance was also associated with large and statistically significantly lower rates of ever having used infertility testing or any fertility services. Insurance type was not associated with differences in time-to-pregnancy.

Conclusions

People covered by Medicaid were less likely to have used fertility services compared with people with private insurance. Differences in coverage of fertility services between Medicaid and private payers may represent a barrier to fertility treatment for Medicaid recipients.

目的我们旨在比较接受医疗补助和私人保险的人在接受任何和特定类型的生育服务方面的差异。方法我们使用2002–2019年全国家庭增长调查数据和线性概率回归模型来检验保险类型(医疗补助或私人)与生育服务使用之间的关系。主要结果是在过去12个月内使用生育服务,次要结果是在任何时候使用特定类型的生育服务:1)检测,2)普通医疗,3)使用任何生育治疗类型(不孕不育的检测、医疗或手术治疗)。此外,我们还使用一种方法计算了怀孕时间,该方法使用调查时受访者尝试怀孕的当前持续时间来估计未观察到的总时间。我们计算了受访者特征的妊娠时间比,以检查保险类型是否与不同的妊娠时间有关。结果在调整后的模型中,与私人保险相比,医疗补助保险在过去12个月内使用生育服务的比例降低了11.2%(95%置信区间:-22.3至-0.0)。相对于私人保险,医疗补助保险还与使用过不孕不育检测或任何生育服务的比率大相关,且在统计上显著较低。保险类型与怀孕时间的差异无关。结论与拥有私人保险的人相比,接受医疗补助的人不太可能使用生育服务。医疗补助和私人支付者之间生育服务覆盖范围的差异可能是医疗补助接受者接受生育治疗的障碍。
{"title":"Differences in Use of Fertility Treatment Between People With Medicaid and Private Health Insurance Coverage in the United States","authors":"Erica L. Eliason PhD ,&nbsp;Marie E. Thoma PhD ,&nbsp;Maria W. Steenland SD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aimed to compare differences in receipt of any and specific types of fertility services between people with Medicaid and private insurance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used National Survey of Family Growth (2002–2019) data and linear probability regression models to examine the association between insurance type (Medicaid or private) and fertility service use. The primary outcome was use of fertility services in the past 12 months, and secondary outcomes were use of specific types of fertility services at any time: 1) testing, 2) common medical treatment, and 3) use of any fertility treatment type (testing, medical treatment, or surgical treatment of infertility). We additionally calculated time-to-pregnancy using a method that estimates the unobserved total amount of time the respondent spent trying to become pregnant using their current duration of pregnancy attempt at the time of the survey. We calculated time-to-pregnancy ratios across respondent characteristics to examine if insurance type was associated with differential time-to-pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In adjusted models, Medicaid coverage was associated with an 11.2-percentage point (95% confidence interval: −22.3 to −0.0) lower use of fertility services in the past 12 months compared with private coverage. Relative to private coverage, Medicaid insurance was also associated with large and statistically significantly lower rates of ever having used infertility testing or any fertility services. Insurance type was not associated with differences in time-to-pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People covered by Medicaid were less likely to have used fertility services compared with people with private insurance. Differences in coverage of fertility services between Medicaid and private payers may represent a barrier to fertility treatment for Medicaid recipients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9767113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Understanding the Mental Health Impact of Previous Pregnancy Loss Among Currently Pregnant Veterans 了解当前怀孕的退伍军人中先前怀孕失败对心理健康的影响
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.006
Mary O. Shapiro PhD , Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers PhD , Kristin M. Mattocks PhD, MPH

Background

Pregnancy loss, including miscarriage and stillbirth, is common and associated with an increased risk for prenatal and postnatal depression, as well as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Racial disparities have been observed in pregnancy loss, with Black women having higher rates of pregnancy loss and postnatal depression. However, no research to date has examined the mental health and demographic correlates of pregnancy loss within a veteran population.

Method

The current study examined associations between pregnancy loss and mental health and demographic correlates among 1,324 pregnant veterans, of which 368 had a history of at least one stillbirth and/or miscarriage.

Results

Veterans with a history of pregnancy loss, compared with those without, were more likely to have a diagnosis of anxiety (52.7% vs. 46.4%, p = .04), depression (62.5% vs. 50.8%, p = .0001), or PTSD (46.5% vs. 37.6%, p = .003); were more likely to report receiving mental health care during pregnancy (23.1% vs. 16.8%, p = .01); and were more likely to have experienced military sexual trauma (harassment: 56.5% vs. 49.9%, p = .04; rape: 38.9% vs. 29.3%, p = .0004). Results also indicated that Black veterans were more likely to report a history of pregnancy loss (32.1% vs. 25.3%, p = .01). Further, Black veterans were more likely to experience clinically meaningful prenatal depression symptoms (adjusted odds ratio: 1.90; 95% confidence interval: 1.42–2.54) after accounting for past loss and age in logistic regression models.

Discussion

Taken together, findings from the present investigation corroborate previous research highlighting the deleterious impact of pregnancy loss and extend prior work by examining these associations among a diverse sample of pregnant veterans.

背景妊娠损失,包括流产和死产,是常见的,并与产前和产后抑郁症以及创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险增加有关。在流产方面观察到了种族差异,黑人女性流产和产后抑郁症的发生率更高。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究对退伍军人群体中的心理健康和人口统计学与妊娠损失的相关性进行检验。方法本研究调查了1324名退伍军人的妊娠损失与心理健康和人口统计学相关性之间的关系,其中368人至少有一次死产和/或流产史。结果与没有流产史的退伍军人相比,有流产史的老兵更有可能被诊断为焦虑(52.7%对46.4%,p=0.04)、抑郁(62.5%对50.8%,p=0.001)或创伤后应激障碍(46.5%对37.6%,p=0.003);更有可能报告在怀孕期间接受心理健康护理(23.1%对16.8%,p=0.01);并且更有可能经历过军事性创伤(骚扰:56.5%对49.9%,p=0.04;强奸:38.9%对29.3%,p=0.004)。结果还表明,黑人退伍军人更有可能报告有流产史(32.1%对25.3%,p=0.001)。此外,在逻辑回归模型中考虑了过去的损失和年龄后,黑人退伍军人更有可能经历有临床意义的产前抑郁症状(调整后的比值比:1.90;95%置信区间:1.42-2.54)。讨论总之,本次调查的结果证实了先前的研究,强调了妊娠损失的有害影响,并通过在不同的孕妇样本中检查这些关联来扩展先前的工作。
{"title":"Understanding the Mental Health Impact of Previous Pregnancy Loss Among Currently Pregnant Veterans","authors":"Mary O. Shapiro PhD ,&nbsp;Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers PhD ,&nbsp;Kristin M. Mattocks PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pregnancy loss, including miscarriage and stillbirth, is common and associated with an increased risk for prenatal and </span>postnatal depression<span><span>, as well as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). </span>Racial disparities have been observed in pregnancy loss, with Black women having higher rates of pregnancy loss and postnatal depression. However, no research to date has examined the mental health and demographic correlates of pregnancy loss within a veteran population.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The current study examined associations between pregnancy loss and mental health and demographic correlates among 1,324 pregnant veterans, of which 368 had a history of at least one stillbirth and/or miscarriage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Veterans with a history of pregnancy loss, compared with those without, were more likely to have a diagnosis of anxiety (52.7% vs. 46.4%, <em>p</em> = .04), depression (62.5% vs. 50.8%, <em>p</em> = .0001), or PTSD (46.5% vs. 37.6%, <em>p</em> = .003); were more likely to report receiving mental health care during pregnancy (23.1% vs. 16.8%, <em>p</em> = .01); and were more likely to have experienced military sexual trauma (harassment: 56.5% vs. 49.9%, <em>p</em> = .04; rape: 38.9% vs. 29.3%, <em>p</em> = .0004). Results also indicated that Black veterans were more likely to report a history of pregnancy loss (32.1% vs. 25.3%, <em>p</em><span><span> = .01). Further, Black veterans were more likely to experience clinically meaningful prenatal depression symptoms (adjusted odds ratio: 1.90; 95% confidence interval: 1.42–2.54) after accounting for past loss and age in </span>logistic regression models.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Taken together, findings from the present investigation corroborate previous research highlighting the deleterious impact of pregnancy loss and extend prior work by examining these associations among a diverse sample of pregnant veterans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9746427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Womens Health Issues
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1