首页 > 最新文献

Educational Research Review最新文献

英文 中文
Assessment as a matter of inclusion: A meta-ethnographic review of the assessment experiences of students with disabilities in higher education 评估是一个全纳问题:对高等教育中残疾学生评估经历的元人种学回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100582
Juuso Henrik Nieminen , Anabel Moriña , Gilda Biagiotti

Assessment plays a crucial role in student learning in higher education. Until rather recently, the role of assessment in relation to inclusion has been unexplored. In this study, we conduct a research synthesis of 42 studies published between 2010 and 2022, including 868 student participants, to map the assessment experiences of students with disabilities in higher education. Specifically, we conduct a meta-ethnographic review to synthesise qualitative studies and capture the participants' lived experiences of assessment. Our analysis considers how these experiences reflect both inclusion and exclusion. We theorise these elusive terms through the ideas of access and participation. Most of the studies considered the students' imminent physical, perceptual and social access to assessment, such as in the cases of inaccessible examination halls or digital assessment systems. A smaller subset of the studies considered inclusion/exclusion as a matter of students’ social participation as fully accepted members of academia. In these studies, assessment was described as providing the students with opportunities to belong to academia, whereas experiences of exclusion portrayed assessment as a mechanism for social segregation and discrimination. Overall, our review shows that assessment is a primary barrier to the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. We propose that the predominant discourse of inclusion in assessment needs to widen from considering immediate access to assessment into considering how assessment regulates the full participation of diverse students in higher education. We discuss the implications of inaccessible assessment for all students and suggest that, ultimately, both access and participation are matters of student identity. Our review has important practical implications for the design of inclusive assessment in the current higher education contexts in which student cohorts are becoming increasingly diverse.

在高等教育中,评估对学生的学习起着至关重要的作用。直到最近,评估在全纳教育中的作用仍未得到探讨。在本研究中,我们对 2010 年至 2022 年间发表的 42 项研究(包括 868 名学生参与者)进行了研究综述,以了解高等教育中残疾学生的评估经历。具体来说,我们进行了元人种学回顾,以综合定性研究并捕捉参与者的评估生活体验。我们的分析考虑了这些经历如何反映出包容和排斥。我们通过 "机会 "和 "参与 "这两个概念将这些难以捉摸的术语理论化。大多数研究都考虑了学生在物理上、感知上和社交上即将获得的评估机会,例如无法进入的考场或数字评估系统。还有一小部分研究则把包容/排斥作为学生作为学术界完全接受的成员参与社会活动的问题来考虑。在这些研究中,评估被描述为为学生提供了属于学术界的机会,而排斥的经历则将评估描述为一种社会隔离和歧视的机制。总之,我们的研究表明,评估是阻碍残疾学生融入高等教育的主要障碍。我们建议,关于评估的全纳性的主要论述需要从考虑评估的直接获取性扩大到考虑评估如何调节不同学生在高等教育中的全面参与。我们讨论了无障碍评估对所有学生的影响,并提出,归根结底,无障碍评估和参与评估都是学生身份的问题。在当前学生群体日益多元化的高等教育背景下,我们的综述对包容性评估的设计具有重要的现实意义。
{"title":"Assessment as a matter of inclusion: A meta-ethnographic review of the assessment experiences of students with disabilities in higher education","authors":"Juuso Henrik Nieminen ,&nbsp;Anabel Moriña ,&nbsp;Gilda Biagiotti","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100582","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessment plays a crucial role in student learning in higher education. Until rather recently, the role of assessment in relation to inclusion has been unexplored. In this study, we conduct a research synthesis of 42 studies published between 2010 and 2022, including 868 student participants, to map the assessment experiences of students with disabilities<span> in higher education. Specifically, we conduct a meta-ethnographic review to synthesise qualitative studies<span><span> and capture the participants' lived experiences of assessment. Our analysis considers how these experiences reflect both inclusion and exclusion. We theorise these elusive terms through the ideas of access and participation. Most of the studies considered the students' imminent physical, perceptual and social access to assessment, such as in the cases of inaccessible examination halls or digital assessment systems. A smaller subset of the studies considered inclusion/exclusion as a matter of students’ social participation as fully accepted members of academia. In these studies, assessment was described as providing the students with opportunities to belong to academia, whereas experiences of exclusion portrayed assessment as a mechanism for </span>social segregation and discrimination. Overall, our review shows that assessment is a primary barrier to the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. We propose that the predominant discourse of inclusion in assessment needs to widen from considering immediate access to assessment into considering how assessment regulates the full participation of diverse students in higher education. We discuss the implications of inaccessible assessment for all students and suggest that, ultimately, both access and participation are matters of student identity. Our review has important practical implications for the design of inclusive assessment in the current higher education contexts in which student cohorts are becoming increasingly diverse.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100582"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138571538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Which domain-specific skills at the beginning of formal schooling predict later mathematical achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis 正规学校教育初期的哪些特定领域技能可预测日后的数学成就?系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100583
Carola Ruiz , Saskia Kohnen , Alexa von Hagen , Fu Yu Kwok , Rebecca Bull

This systematic review examines which domain-specific numeracy skills in the first year of formal schooling most reliably predict achievement in mathematics during primary school. Longitudinal studies that assessed domain-specific skills in the first year of formal schooling and mathematical outcomes at a later grade in primary school were included. Databases were searched in July 2020. Fifty-four studies were included, representing 13,453 participants. We investigated the strength of the associations between different types of domain-specific skills and mathematical outcomes through correlated effects models and random effects univariate meta-analyses. Results showed small to large significant positive correlations. The strength of the evidence is limited by the small number of studies and the variability found in measures. The findings are analyzed in light of theoretical models of numerical cognition. Implications for future research are discussed.

本系统性综述研究了正规教育第一年中哪些特定领域的计算技能最能可靠地预测小学数学成绩。纳入的纵向研究评估了正规学校教育第一年的特定领域技能和小学高年级的数学成绩。2020 年 7 月对数据库进行了检索。共纳入 54 项研究,涉及 13453 名参与者。我们通过相关效应模型和随机效应单变量元分析,研究了不同类型的特定领域技能与数学成绩之间的关联强度。结果表明,两者之间存在由小到大的显著正相关。由于研究数量较少,且测量方法存在差异,因此证据的力度受到限制。我们根据数字认知的理论模型对研究结果进行了分析。讨论了未来研究的意义。
{"title":"Which domain-specific skills at the beginning of formal schooling predict later mathematical achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Carola Ruiz ,&nbsp;Saskia Kohnen ,&nbsp;Alexa von Hagen ,&nbsp;Fu Yu Kwok ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bull","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100583","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100583","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This systematic review examines which domain-specific numeracy skills in the first year of formal schooling most reliably predict achievement in mathematics during primary school. </span>Longitudinal studies that assessed domain-specific skills in the first year of formal schooling and mathematical outcomes at a later grade in primary school were included. Databases were searched in July 2020. Fifty-four studies were included, representing 13,453 participants. We investigated the strength of the associations between different types of domain-specific skills and mathematical outcomes through correlated effects models and random effects univariate meta-analyses. Results showed small to large significant positive correlations. The strength of the evidence is limited by the small number of studies and the variability found in measures. The findings are analyzed in light of theoretical models of numerical cognition. Implications for future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100583"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138559446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knowledge sharing among academics in higher education: A systematic literature review and future agenda 高等教育学术界的知识共享:系统文献综述与未来议程
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100573
Zhenyu Fan, Loo-See Beh

The current literature on knowledge sharing among academics in higher education institutions is still fragmented and loosely focused. A systematic literature review was conducted to understand how much has been studied on this topic, to map out what are the major factors that influence knowledge sharing, and to make a chart for future research. A total of 50 articles from 2001 to 2021 have been selected and synthesized from an initial identification of 558 articles by employing electronic databases, backward searching, and forward searching. From the findings, three groups of antecedents emerged: individual, organizational, and technological factors. Among all factors, technological factors were understudied compared to individual and organizational factors. Specifically, more efforts have been put into examining the extrinsic and intrinsic benefits of knowledge sharing, organizational culture/climate, and leadership support whereas costs of knowledge sharing, organizational structure, and technology-related factors are rarely discussed. The findings provide implications for management in higher education institutions to design appropriate strategies to promote knowledge sharing among faculty staff.

目前关于高等教育机构学者之间知识共享的文献仍然是碎片化和松散集中的。我们进行了系统的文献综述,以了解该主题的研究程度,并绘制出影响知识共享的主要因素,并为未来的研究制作图表。通过电子数据库、后向检索、前向检索等方法,对558篇文章进行初步鉴定,从中筛选出2001 - 2021年的50篇文章进行综合。根据这些发现,出现了三组前因:个人因素、组织因素和技术因素。在所有因素中,技术因素相对于个人因素和组织因素研究不足。具体地说,更多的努力被用于研究知识共享、组织文化/气候和领导支持的外在和内在效益,而知识共享的成本、组织结构和技术相关因素却很少被讨论。研究结果为高等教育机构的管理人员设计适当的策略以促进教职员工之间的知识共享提供了启示。
{"title":"Knowledge sharing among academics in higher education: A systematic literature review and future agenda","authors":"Zhenyu Fan,&nbsp;Loo-See Beh","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100573","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100573","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current literature on knowledge sharing among academics in higher education institutions is still fragmented and loosely focused. A systematic literature review was conducted to understand how much has been studied on this topic, to map out what are the major factors that influence knowledge sharing, and to make a chart for future research. A total of 50 articles from 2001 to 2021 have been selected and synthesized from an initial identification of 558 articles by employing electronic databases, backward searching, and forward searching. From the findings, three groups of antecedents emerged: individual, organizational, and technological factors. Among all factors, technological factors were understudied compared to individual and organizational factors. Specifically, more efforts have been put into examining the extrinsic and intrinsic benefits of knowledge sharing, organizational culture/climate, and leadership support whereas costs of knowledge sharing, organizational structure, and technology-related factors are rarely discussed. The findings provide implications for management in higher education institutions to design appropriate strategies to promote knowledge sharing among faculty staff.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138475722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of additions to independent silent reading on students’ reading proficiency, motivation, and behavior: Results of a meta-analysis 增加独立默读对学生阅读能力、动机和行为的影响:一项元分析的结果
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100572
Stephan Merke , Lesya Ganushchak , Roel van Steensel

One often used approach to increase students' reading frequency is investing in independent silent reading (ISR) at schools: regularly scheduling time during which students read silently in books of their own choice. However, evidence for the impact of ISR is inconclusive and there appear to be important barriers to its effects on students' reading frequency, motivation, and proficiency: particularly struggling readers have difficulties choosing appropriate books, simply allotting time for reading does not guarantee that students read, ISR lacks accountability, and students are not always given the opportunity to interact about what they read. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to test whether additions to ISR that aim to overcome these barriers contribute to the effects of ISR on students' reading. Using outcomes of 51 effect studies covering 56 samples of students in primary and secondary education, we established a small but significant positive short-term intervention effect on overall reading proficiency (Cohen's d = 0.27). We additionally found that additions to ISR were particularly effective for students at risk of reading failure; for stronger readers, effects were absent. Finally, we found a negative effect of help or instruction by the teacher, which suggests that activities during reading might interfere with students' engagement with texts.

增加学生阅读频率的一种常用方法是在学校投资自主默读(ISR):定期安排时间,让学生在自己选择的书籍中默读。然而,ISR影响的证据是不确定的,它对学生阅读频率、动机和熟练程度的影响似乎存在重要障碍:特别是困难的读者在选择合适的书方面存在困难,简单地分配阅读时间并不能保证学生阅读,ISR缺乏问责制,学生并不总是有机会就他们所阅读的内容进行互动。当前荟萃分析的目的是测试旨在克服这些障碍的ISR的添加是否有助于ISR对学生阅读的影响。使用51项效应研究的结果,涵盖56个中小学教育学生样本,我们建立了一个小但显著的积极短期干预对整体阅读能力的影响(Cohen's d = 0.27)。我们还发现,增加ISR对有阅读失败风险的学生特别有效;对于较强的阅读者,没有影响。最后,我们发现了教师帮助或指导的负面影响,这表明阅读过程中的活动可能会干扰学生对文本的参与。
{"title":"Effects of additions to independent silent reading on students’ reading proficiency, motivation, and behavior: Results of a meta-analysis","authors":"Stephan Merke ,&nbsp;Lesya Ganushchak ,&nbsp;Roel van Steensel","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100572","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100572","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One often used approach to increase students' reading frequency is investing in independent silent reading (ISR) at schools: regularly scheduling time during which students read silently in books of their own choice. However, evidence for the impact of ISR is inconclusive and there appear to be important barriers to its effects on students' reading frequency, motivation, and proficiency: particularly struggling readers have difficulties choosing appropriate books, simply allotting time for reading does not guarantee that students read, ISR lacks accountability, and students are not always given the opportunity to interact about what they read. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to test whether additions to ISR that aim to overcome these barriers contribute to the effects of ISR on students' reading. Using outcomes of 51 effect studies covering 56 samples of students in primary and secondary education, we established a small but significant positive short-term intervention effect on overall reading proficiency (Cohen's <em>d</em> = 0.27). We additionally found that additions to ISR were particularly effective for students at risk of reading failure; for stronger readers, effects were absent. Finally, we found a negative effect of help or instruction by the teacher, which suggests that activities during reading might interfere with students' engagement with texts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000659/pdfft?md5=2f38ee23edce60527d90d89d7bdad8f9&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X23000659-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138297705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis 儿童词形意识与阅读理解的关系:系统回顾与元分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100571
Yazhi Liu, Margriet Anna Groen, Kate Cain

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension, taking into account critical factors that could affect its strength. Following NIRO guidelines, we included 44 studies involving 63 independent samples, and 126 correlations between morphological awareness and reading comprehension. Overall, we found a significant association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension (r = 0.565), but also large heterogeneity (81.37%), supporting the need for analysis of potential moderators: age, type of morphologically complex word, characteristics of morphological awareness and reading comprehension tests were examined. We found that type of morphologically complex word was the only significant moderator of this association. In sum, we have demonstrated that morphological awareness influences reading comprehension across a wide age range. Implications for educational practice, as well as recommendations that future studies report more detailed information about participants and measures, are discussed.

本系统综述和荟萃分析考察了词形意识与阅读理解之间的关系,并考虑了可能影响其强度的关键因素。根据NIRO的指导方针,我们纳入了44项研究,涉及63个独立样本,126个形态学意识与阅读理解之间的相关性。总体而言,我们发现词形意识与阅读理解之间存在显著的关联(r = 0.565),但也存在较大的异质性(81.37%),支持需要分析潜在的调节因子:年龄、词形复杂词的类型、词形意识特征和阅读理解测试。我们发现,词形复杂的词类型是这种关联的唯一显著调节因子。总之,我们已经证明了词形意识在广泛的年龄范围内影响阅读理解。讨论了对教育实践的启示,以及建议未来的研究报告更多关于参与者和措施的详细信息。
{"title":"The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yazhi Liu,&nbsp;Margriet Anna Groen,&nbsp;Kate Cain","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100571","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100571","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension, taking into account critical factors that could affect its strength. Following NIRO guidelines, we included 44 studies involving 63 independent samples, and 126 correlations between morphological awareness and reading comprehension. Overall, we found a significant association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension (<em>r</em> = 0.565), but also large heterogeneity (81.37%), supporting the need for analysis of potential moderators: age, type of morphologically complex word, characteristics of morphological awareness and reading comprehension tests were examined. We found that type of morphologically complex word was the only significant moderator of this association. In sum, we have demonstrated that morphological awareness influences reading comprehension across a wide age range. Implications for educational practice, as well as recommendations that future studies report more detailed information about participants and measures, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100571"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000647/pdfft?md5=c6533f1d299b1caee724e8685b5e0b39&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X23000647-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138297663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing a dynamic understanding of factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and skills through a systematic literature review 通过系统的文献综述,建立对影响大学生领导方法、观念和技能的因素的动态理解
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100570
Katherine K.W. Lee, Cecilia K.Y. Chan

Leadership skills are an important area of students’ development and a key learning outcome of their university education. This systematic review aims to identify, summarise, and map out the various factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and beliefs, in order to establish a more comprehensive understanding of how development in these areas can be better targeted and nurtured. Drawing on 54 empirical journal articles identified in the search stage, two main themes were identified: student-centric attributes, and environmental and contextual elements. Ranging from students’ internal self-beliefs to their immediate social situations and wider sociocultural conventions, findings from this review reveal a dynamic set of different factors that interact with one another. The findings of this review raise important implications for efforts targeting students’ leadership skills development, including the need to cultivate students’ sense of leadership self-efficacy and raise awareness of harmful social stereotypes.

领导能力是学生发展的一个重要领域,也是大学教育的一个重要学习成果。本系统综述旨在识别、总结和绘制出影响大学生领导方法、观念和信念的各种因素,以便更全面地了解如何更好地定位和培养这些领域的发展。根据在搜索阶段确定的54篇实证期刊文章,确定了两个主要主题:以学生为中心的属性,以及环境和上下文因素。从学生的内在自我信念到他们当下的社会情境和更广泛的社会文化习俗,这一综述的发现揭示了一系列相互作用的动态不同因素。本研究的结果对学生领导技能的发展提出了重要的启示,包括培养学生的领导自我效能感和提高对有害社会刻板印象的认识。
{"title":"Establishing a dynamic understanding of factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and skills through a systematic literature review","authors":"Katherine K.W. Lee,&nbsp;Cecilia K.Y. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100570","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100570","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Leadership skills are an important area of students’ development and a key learning outcome of their university education. This systematic review aims to identify, summarise, and map out the various factors that influence university students’ leadership approaches, perceptions, and beliefs, in order to establish a more comprehensive understanding of how development in these areas can be better targeted and nurtured. Drawing on 54 empirical journal articles identified in the search stage, two main themes were identified: student-centric attributes, and environmental and contextual elements. Ranging from students’ internal self-beliefs to their immediate social situations and wider sociocultural conventions, findings from this review reveal a dynamic set of different factors that interact with one another. The findings of this review raise important implications for efforts targeting students’ leadership skills development, including the need to cultivate students’ sense of leadership self-efficacy and raise awareness of harmful social stereotypes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100570"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138297704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses 教学视频中的教师在场效应及其调节因素:一系列元分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564
Maik Beege , Noah L. Schroeder , Steffi Heidig , Günter Daniel Rey , Sascha Schneider

Researchers disagree on the extent to which social cues in instructional videos influence learning and learning-relevant outcomes and processes. The instructor presence effect states that visible instructors in instructional videos lead to increased social presence and higher scores in subjective ratings like motivation, social presence, or affect, but do not improve learning outcomes. In contrast, the Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments outlines how social cues not only enhance social, emotional, and motivational processes, but they also potentially promote learning outcomes. We conducted a series of meta-analyses to explore the effects of instructor presence in instructional videos on retention, transfer, social presence, motivation, cognitive load, affect, and visual dwell time. The meta-analyses include 35 studies, which contained 46 pair-wise comparisons and 6339 participants. Results revealed a small, statistically significant positive effect of including a visual instructor on retention outcomes, but no significant effect on transfer performance. A visible instructor also significantly enhanced social presence, affective, and motivational ratings. Furthermore, we found that a visible instructor significantly reduced dwell time on relevant visual material but also reduced subjective perception of extraneous cognitive load. Significant moderator effects could be found regarding prior knowledge, the instructional domain as well as the size of the instructor.

研究人员对教学视频中的社会线索在多大程度上影响学习和学习相关的结果和过程存在分歧。导师在场效应表明,教学视频中可见的导师会增加社交在场感,并在动机、社交在场感或情感等主观评级中获得更高的分数,但不会改善学习结果。相比之下,数字环境中学习的认知-情感-社会理论概述了社会线索如何不仅增强社会、情感和动机过程,而且可能促进学习结果。我们进行了一系列元分析,以探索教学视频中教师在场对保留、转移、社交在场、动机、认知负荷、影响和视觉停留时间的影响。荟萃分析包括35项研究,其中包括46项配对比较和6339名参与者。结果显示,包括视觉教练对保留结果的积极影响很小,具有统计学意义,但对转移表现没有显著影响。一个可见的教练也显著提高了社会存在感、情感和动机评分。此外,我们发现,可视教练显著减少了对相关视觉材料的停留时间,但也减少了对外部认知负荷的主观感知。在先验知识、教学领域以及教师规模方面可以发现显著的调节效应。
{"title":"The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses","authors":"Maik Beege ,&nbsp;Noah L. Schroeder ,&nbsp;Steffi Heidig ,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey ,&nbsp;Sascha Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers disagree on the extent to which social cues in instructional videos influence learning and learning-relevant outcomes and processes. The instructor presence effect states that visible instructors in instructional videos lead to increased social presence and higher scores in subjective ratings like motivation, social presence, or affect, but do not improve learning outcomes. In contrast, the Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments outlines how social cues not only enhance social, emotional, and motivational processes, but they also potentially promote learning outcomes. We conducted a series of meta-analyses to explore the effects of instructor presence in instructional videos on retention, transfer, social presence, motivation, cognitive load, affect, and visual dwell time. The meta-analyses include 35 studies, which contained 46 pair-wise comparisons and 6339 participants. Results revealed a small, statistically significant positive effect of including a visual instructor on retention outcomes, but no significant effect on transfer performance. A visible instructor also significantly enhanced social presence, affective, and motivational ratings. Furthermore, we found that a visible instructor significantly reduced dwell time on relevant visual material but also reduced subjective perception of extraneous cognitive load. Significant moderator effects could be found regarding prior knowledge, the instructional domain as well as the size of the instructor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2300057X/pdfft?md5=ca6ecd608f5ce1da63d802a9438968cd&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X2300057X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71511194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review 教师在形成性评估实践中使用技术的先决条件:系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568
Kristin Børte , Sølvi Lillejord , Jessica Chan , Barbara Wasson , Samuel Greiff

While researchers promote the interactive learning potential of digital tools, studies reveal that teachers adapt technology to existing practice instead of using the tools' potential for student active learning. Researchers also argue that formative assessment enhances students' learning, while studies find formative assessment difficult to implement. To investigate these paradoxes and better understand how teachers use digital tools in formative assessment and with what result, we conducted a systematic review of teachers' technology use in formative assessment practices in primary and secondary education. Systematic searches identified 22 relevant articles that are included in the review. We found unclear definitions of formative assessment across studies and document challenges teachers encounter when they use technology for formative assessment purposes. We conclude with three prerequisites for teachers' successful technology use in formative assessment practices: 1) clear definitions of formative assessment, 2) alignment between digital tools and pedagogical practice, and 3) data literacy to examine and interpret information and use this to improve students’ learning. The review also documents knowledge gaps in current research.

虽然研究人员提倡数字工具的互动学习潜力,但研究表明,教师使技术适应现有的实践,而不是利用工具的潜力来促进学生的主动学习。研究者也认为形成性评价能促进学生的学习,然而研究发现形成性评价难以实施。为了调查这些矛盾并更好地理解教师如何在形成性评估中使用数字工具以及产生了什么结果,我们对教师在中小学教育形成性评估实践中使用技术进行了系统回顾。系统检索确定了综述中包含的22篇相关文章。我们发现研究中形成性评估的定义不明确,教师在使用技术进行形成性评估时遇到的文件挑战。我们总结了教师在形成性评估实践中成功使用技术的三个先决条件:1)形成性评估的明确定义,2)数字工具与教学实践之间的一致性,以及3)检查和解释信息并使用它来改善学生学习的数据素养。该综述还记录了当前研究中的知识缺口。
{"title":"Prerequisites for teachers’ technology use in formative assessment practices: A systematic review","authors":"Kristin Børte ,&nbsp;Sølvi Lillejord ,&nbsp;Jessica Chan ,&nbsp;Barbara Wasson ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While researchers promote the interactive learning potential of digital tools, studies reveal that teachers adapt technology to existing practice instead of using the tools' potential for student active learning. Researchers also argue that formative assessment enhances students' learning, while studies find formative assessment difficult to implement. To investigate these paradoxes and better understand how teachers use digital tools in formative assessment and with what result, we conducted a systematic review of teachers' technology use in formative assessment practices in primary and secondary education. Systematic searches identified 22 relevant articles that are included in the review. We found unclear definitions of formative assessment across studies and document challenges teachers encounter when they use technology for formative assessment purposes. We conclude with three prerequisites for teachers' successful technology use in formative assessment practices: 1) clear definitions of formative assessment, 2) alignment between digital tools and pedagogical practice, and 3) data literacy to examine and interpret information and use this to improve students’ learning. The review also documents knowledge gaps in current research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100568"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000611/pdfft?md5=04acfa9dd7d6d20a9ae340815680ca5f&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X23000611-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72365727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of functional literacy interventions for adults 成人功能性读写干预有效性的荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569
Juliane Kindl, Wolfgang Lenhard

A significant portion of the working-age population has only rudimentary literacy skills. Many people who are functionally illiterate have problems to perform basic daily tasks and to participate in society. Given the paucity of research, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adult literacy interventions using a three-level meta-regression analysis, controlling for potential moderators of effectiveness. The literature search included empirical studies with a control group design in English, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. 39 controlled primary studies met the inclusion criteria, including 236 effect sizes. There was a small but significant main effect on participants' literacy level (g = 0.22). Interventions with a lower frequency of weekly sessions were more effective than more intensive approaches. No significant effect on effectiveness was found for total duration, context, language of instruction, teacher-student ratio, computer use, or initial literacy level of participants. As a large proportion of the primary studies were found to be at high risk of bias, more reliable primary studies are needed to support the findings and provide a more nuanced view of the effectiveness of interventions. Nevertheless, this review provides promising evidence that adults with low literacy skills can benefit from literacy interventions.

相当一部分适龄劳动人口只有基本的识字能力。许多功能性文盲在执行基本的日常任务和参与社会方面存在问题。鉴于研究的缺乏,本研究的目的是利用三水平元回归分析来评估成人识字干预的效果,控制潜在的效果调节因子。文献检索包括以英语、法语、德语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语为对照设计的实证研究。39项对照初级研究符合纳入标准,包括236个效应量。受试者的识字水平有小而显著的主效应(g = 0.22)。每周治疗频率较低的干预措施比更密集的方法更有效。总体持续时间、教学环境、教学语言、师生比例、计算机使用情况或参与者的初始识字水平对有效性没有显著影响。由于大部分初步研究被发现存在高偏倚风险,因此需要更可靠的初步研究来支持这些发现,并对干预措施的有效性提供更细致入微的看法。然而,这篇综述提供了有希望的证据,表明读写能力低的成年人可以从读写干预中受益。
{"title":"A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of functional literacy interventions for adults","authors":"Juliane Kindl,&nbsp;Wolfgang Lenhard","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A significant portion of the working-age population has only rudimentary literacy skills. Many people who are functionally illiterate have problems to perform basic daily tasks and to participate in society. Given the paucity of research, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adult literacy interventions using a three-level meta-regression analysis, controlling for potential moderators of effectiveness. The literature search included empirical studies with a control group design in English, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. 39 controlled primary studies met the inclusion criteria, including 236 effect sizes. There was a small but significant main effect on participants' literacy level (</span><em>g</em><span> = 0.22). Interventions with a lower frequency of weekly sessions were more effective than more intensive approaches. No significant effect on effectiveness was found for total duration, context, language of instruction, teacher-student ratio, computer use, or initial literacy level of participants. As a large proportion of the primary studies were found to be at high risk of bias, more reliable primary studies are needed to support the findings and provide a more nuanced view of the effectiveness of interventions. Nevertheless, this review provides promising evidence that adults with low literacy skills can benefit from literacy interventions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100569"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72365824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review 是什么让同伴协作解决问题富有成效或毫无成效:一个定性的系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567
Aleksandar Baucal , Smiljana Jošić , Ivana Stepanović Ilić , Marina Videnović , Jovan Ivanović , Ksenija Krstić

Global demands for collaborative problem solving (CPS) have sparked investigations of peer collaboration in the educational context. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematize research findings on (a) characteristics of productive and unproductive face-to-face (f2f) or synchronous CPS via digital devices among adolescents in the educational context, (b) training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS, and (c) ways of supporting productive CPS by using digital resources. We conducted a thematic analysis of 160 selected papers from a larger corpus and identified six main themes, that is, groups of characteristics of CPS: socio-cognitive aspects; socio-emotional aspects; the quality of task/problem-solving strategies; regulation of group activity oriented towards the task; regulation of group activity oriented towards group members; and participant engagement in CPS. We found that in efforts to contribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction in three ways, by focusing on either cognitive processes, group discussions, or classroom management. Regarding the third goal, we identified two major roles of digital resources in adolescent CPS. The first role pertained to ICT as a source of relevant knowledge or a tool for problem solving and the other role was related to peer collaboration and ICT as a tool for scaffolding collaboration. All characteristics that emerged in this review are discussed and concluding comments refer to educational implications.

全球对协作解决问题(CPS)的需求引发了对教育背景下同伴协作的调查。本系统综述的目的是确定并系统化以下方面的研究成果:(a)在教育背景下通过数字设备在青少年中进行生产性和非生产性面对面(f2f)或同步CPS的特征,(b)使青少年能够参与生产性CPS的培训和脚手架模式,以及(c)通过使用数字资源支持生产性CPS的方法。我们从一个较大的语料库中选择了160篇论文进行了专题分析,并确定了六个主题,即CPS的特征组:社会认知方面;socio-emotional方面;任务/问题解决策略的质量;以任务为导向的群体活动调控以群体成员为中心的群体活动调控;以及参与CPS的程度。我们发现,在努力为成功的CPS做出贡献的过程中,成年人(教师/研究人员)可以通过三种方式调节同伴互动,通过关注认知过程,小组讨论或课堂管理。关于第三个目标,我们确定了数字资源在青少年CPS中的两个主要角色。第一个作用涉及信通技术作为相关知识的来源或解决问题的工具,另一个作用涉及对等协作和信通技术作为支架式协作的工具。本文讨论了本综述中出现的所有特征,结论性评论涉及教育意义。
{"title":"What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review","authors":"Aleksandar Baucal ,&nbsp;Smiljana Jošić ,&nbsp;Ivana Stepanović Ilić ,&nbsp;Marina Videnović ,&nbsp;Jovan Ivanović ,&nbsp;Ksenija Krstić","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Global demands for collaborative problem solving (CPS) have sparked investigations of peer collaboration in the educational context. The aim of this </span>systematic review<span> was to identify and systematize research findings on (a) characteristics of productive and unproductive face-to-face (f2f) or synchronous CPS via digital devices among adolescents in the educational context, (b) training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS, and (c) ways of supporting productive CPS by using digital resources. We conducted a thematic analysis of 160 selected papers from a larger corpus and identified six main themes, that is, groups of characteristics of CPS: socio-cognitive aspects; socio-emotional aspects; the quality of task/problem-solving strategies; regulation of group activity oriented towards the task; regulation of group activity oriented towards group members; and participant engagement in CPS. We found that in efforts to contribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction<span> in three ways, by focusing on either cognitive processes, group discussions, or classroom management. Regarding the third goal, we identified two major roles of digital resources in adolescent CPS. The first role pertained to ICT as a source of relevant knowledge or a tool for problem solving and the other role was related to peer collaboration and ICT as a tool for scaffolding collaboration. All characteristics that emerged in this review are discussed and concluding comments refer to educational implications.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138293432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Educational Research Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1