首页 > 最新文献

Educational Research Review最新文献

英文 中文
A meta-analysis of the antecedents of teacher turnover and retention 教师离职和留任的前因元分析
IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100606
Hugh A.D. Gundlach, Gavin R. Slemp, John Hattie

High teacher turnover in schools is a problem in many countries. Many studies have investigated various antecedent effects of turnover in isolation; however, few comparative assessments of the antecedents have been conducted. A meta-analysis was conducted to ascertain the relative power of effects between various antecedents, and turnover and retention behaviors and intentions. We observed variations in the strength of associations between antecedents and real turnover and retention compared to the associations between the same factors and intended turnover and retention. This discrepancy is likely attributed to the fact that involuntary turnover and retention, which may play a significant role in the teacher turnover crisis, cannot be adequately captured in studies focusing solely on intentions.

学校教师流失率高是许多国家面临的一个问题。许多研究单独调查了教师流失的各种前因效应,但很少对各种前因进行比较评估。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定各种前因与教师离职和留任行为及意向之间的相对影响强度。我们观察到,与相同因素与离职和留任意向之间的关联相比,前因与实际离职和留任之间的关联强度存在差异。造成这种差异的原因可能是,非自愿离职和留任可能在教师离职危机中发挥着重要作用,而只关注意向的研究无法充分捕捉到这一点。
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the antecedents of teacher turnover and retention","authors":"Hugh A.D. Gundlach,&nbsp;Gavin R. Slemp,&nbsp;John Hattie","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100606","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100606","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High teacher turnover in schools is a problem in many countries. Many studies have investigated various antecedent effects of turnover in isolation; however, few comparative assessments of the antecedents have been conducted. A meta-analysis was conducted to ascertain the relative power of effects between various antecedents, and turnover and retention behaviors and intentions. We observed variations in the strength of associations between antecedents and real turnover and retention compared to the associations between the same factors and intended turnover and retention. This discrepancy is likely attributed to the fact that involuntary turnover and retention, which may play a significant role in the teacher turnover crisis, cannot be adequately captured in studies focusing solely on intentions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100606"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000150/pdfft?md5=6879240cf42370026fc60d5fde392b54&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000150-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141037529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Higher education teachers’ understandings of and challenges for inclusion and inclusive learning environments: A systematic literature review 高等教育教师对全纳和全纳学习环境的理解与挑战:系统文献综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605
Tisja Korthals Altes , Martijn Willemse , Sui Lin Goei , Melanie Ehren

Since the 1990s, there is a rise in attention to inclusion in education encompassing inclusion in Higher Education (HE), which is an important element of-/and leads to equity in society. HE-teachers are a key factor in improving inclusion in higher education, but little is known about 1) their understanding of inclusion, 2) the challenges they experience for establishing inclusion, and 3) how they characterize inclusive learning environments. In this study, these three aspects were explored using a systematic literature review. From the selected 36 peer-reviewed articles was concluded that even though there is a rise in attention to inclusion in HE in recent years, most attention is still on integrating students with disabilities in regular education instead of the newer broader definition of inclusion ‘for every student’. When HE-teachers’ understanding of inclusion was discussed, they more often had a positive attitude toward inclusion, but it is unclear what this attitude was against (and what is meant by positive/negative) due to the neglect of mentioned definitions of characteristics. HE-teachers’ challenges for inclusion in higher education are internal (lack of knowledge, skills, experience, and confidence) and institutional (lack of resources, support, information, and training). These findings demonstrate the necessity of cooperation between teachers and HE-institutions, in addition to the role of scholars in studying teachers' understanding of inclusion, to improve the inclusive learning environment of students in HE.

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,全纳教育受到越来越多的关注,其中包括高等教育 (HE)中的全纳教育,这是社会公平的一个重要因素。高校教师是提高高等教育全纳性的一个关键因素,但人们对 1) 他们对全纳的理解,2) 他们在建立全纳教育时所遇到的挑战,以及 3) 他们是如何描述全纳学习环境的,却知之甚少。本研究通过系统的文献综述对这三个方面进行了探讨。从所选的 36 篇同行评议文章中得出的结论是,尽管近年来对高校全纳教育的关注度有所提高,但大多数关注点仍然是将残疾学生纳入常规教育,而不是 "面向每一个学生 "这一更为宽泛的全纳定义。在讨论高校教师对全纳的理解时,他们对全纳更多地持积极态度,但由于忽略了所提及的特征定义,这种态度针对的是什么(以及积极/消极的含义是什么)并不清楚。高校教师在高等教育全纳方面面临的挑战既有内部的(缺乏知识、技能、经验和信 心),也有体制上的(缺乏资源、支持、信息和培训)。这些研究结果表明,除了学者在研究教师对全纳的理解方面所起的作用外,教师和高等院校之间还必须开展合作,以改善高等院校学生的全纳学习环境。
{"title":"Higher education teachers’ understandings of and challenges for inclusion and inclusive learning environments: A systematic literature review","authors":"Tisja Korthals Altes ,&nbsp;Martijn Willemse ,&nbsp;Sui Lin Goei ,&nbsp;Melanie Ehren","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the 1990s, there is a rise in attention to inclusion in education encompassing inclusion in Higher Education (HE), which is an important element of-/and leads to equity in society. HE-teachers are a key factor in improving inclusion in higher education, but little is known about 1) their understanding of inclusion, 2) the challenges they experience for establishing inclusion, and 3) how they characterize inclusive learning environments. In this study, these three aspects were explored using a systematic literature review. From the selected 36 peer-reviewed articles was concluded that even though there is a rise in attention to inclusion in HE in recent years, most attention is still on integrating students with disabilities in regular education instead of the newer broader definition of inclusion ‘for every student’. When HE-teachers’ understanding of inclusion was discussed, they more often had a positive attitude toward inclusion, but it is unclear what this attitude was against (and what is meant by positive/negative) due to the neglect of mentioned definitions of characteristics. HE-teachers’ challenges for inclusion in higher education are internal (lack of knowledge, skills, experience, and confidence) and institutional (lack of resources, support, information, and training). These findings demonstrate the necessity of cooperation between teachers and HE-institutions, in addition to the role of scholars in studying teachers' understanding of inclusion, to improve the inclusive learning environment of students in HE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100605"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000149/pdfft?md5=0871f66c23f2f1c1f5c16bbc58d5f4d7&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000149-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140637741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning: A systematic review with narrative synthesis 在线学习中的神经多样性和认知负荷:系统回顾与叙事综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100604
Anne-Laure Le Cunff, Vincent Giampietro, Eleanor Dommett

This systematic review with narrative synthesis aimed to examine the available evidence on the relationship between neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning. Despite the known relationship between working memory impairments and neurodiversity, there has been a lack of systematic investigation into how cognitive load impacts neurodivergent students in online learning environments. This review, which includes 90 studies conducted in 21 countries, reveals that the majority (92%) did not consider neurodiversity as a potential factor influencing cognitive load in online learning. The few that did suggest distinct patterns of cognitive load in online learning for neurodivergent students, suggesting a need for more research in this area. The results also point to the potential for methodological advancements in measuring cognitive load in online learning, highlighting that 80% of studies with only neurotypical participants and 60% of studies including neurodivergent participants relied solely on subjective measures of cognitive load. This review contributes to the field by offering a comprehensive overview of our current knowledge of the relationship between neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning, identifying significant gaps and suggesting directions for future studies.

本系统综述旨在研究在线学习中神经多样性与认知负荷之间关系的现有证据。尽管工作记忆障碍与神经多样性之间的关系众所周知,但对于认知负荷如何影响在线学习环境中的神经变异学生,一直缺乏系统的研究。本综述包括在 21 个国家进行的 90 项研究,其中大多数(92%)研究并未将神经多样性视为影响在线学习认知负荷的潜在因素。少数研究表明,神经多 样性学生在在线学习中的认知负荷具有独特的模式,这表明需要在这一领域开展更多的研究。研究结果还指出,在测量在线学习认知负荷方面,有可能在方法论上取得进展。研究结果突出表明,80%的研究仅涉及神经畸形参与者,60%的研究包括神经变异参与者,这些研究仅依赖于对认知负荷的主观测量。本综述全面概述了我们目前对在线学习中神经多样性与认知负荷之间关系的了解,找出了重大差距,并提出了未来研究的方向,从而为该领域做出了贡献。
{"title":"Neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning: A systematic review with narrative synthesis","authors":"Anne-Laure Le Cunff,&nbsp;Vincent Giampietro,&nbsp;Eleanor Dommett","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100604","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review with narrative synthesis aimed to examine the available evidence on the relationship between neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning. Despite the known relationship between working memory impairments and neurodiversity, there has been a lack of systematic investigation into how cognitive load impacts neurodivergent students in online learning environments. This review, which includes 90 studies conducted in 21 countries, reveals that the majority (92%) did not consider neurodiversity as a potential factor influencing cognitive load in online learning. The few that did suggest distinct patterns of cognitive load in online learning for neurodivergent students, suggesting a need for more research in this area. The results also point to the potential for methodological advancements in measuring cognitive load in online learning, highlighting that 80% of studies with only neurotypical participants and 60% of studies including neurodivergent participants relied solely on subjective measures of cognitive load. This review contributes to the field by offering a comprehensive overview of our current knowledge of the relationship between neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning, identifying significant gaps and suggesting directions for future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100604"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000137/pdfft?md5=40528b3b3aa0328fb47fd1bfc9281314&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000137-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140309392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Morphological assessment features and their relations to reading: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study 形态评估特征及其与阅读的关系:元分析结构方程模型研究
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100602
Gal Kaldes , Elizabeth L. Tighe , MaryAnn Romski , Therese D. Pigott , Christina Doan Sun

Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units of language (e.g., affixes, base words) that express grammatical and semantic information. Additionally, morphological knowledge is significantly related to children's word reading and reading comprehension skills. Researchers have broadly assessed morphological knowledge by using a wide range of tasks and stimuli, which has influenced the interpretation of the relations between morphological knowledge and reading outcomes. This review of 103 studies used meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) to investigate the relations between commonly occurring morphological knowledge assessment features (e.g., written versus oral, spelling versus no spelling) in the literature to reading outcomes, including word reading and reading comprehension. Meta-regression techniques were used to examine moderators of age and reading ability. Morphological assessments that used a written modality (e.g., reading, writing) were more predictive of word reading outcomes than those administered orally. Assessments of morphological spelling were more predictive of both word reading and reading comprehension outcomes than those that did not examine spelling accuracy. Age was a significant moderator of the relation between morphology and word reading, such that the relation was stronger for the younger than the older children. Younger children also demonstrated higher relations between multiple task dimensions and reading comprehension, including oral tasks, tasks without decoding, and tasks that provided context clues. These findings have important implications for future morphological intervention studies aimed to improve children's reading outcomes, in particular the use of orthography and spelling within the context of teaching morphology.

词素是表达语法和语义信息的最小的有意义的语言单位(如词缀、基词)。此外,词素知识与儿童的单词阅读和阅读理解能力有很大关系。研究人员通过使用各种任务和刺激对形态知识进行了广泛的评估,这影响了对形态知识与阅读结果之间关系的解释。本研究回顾了 103 项研究,采用元分析结构方程模型(MASEM)来研究文献中常见的形态学知识评估特征(如书面与口头、拼写与不拼写)与阅读结果(包括单词阅读和阅读理解)之间的关系。元回归技术用于研究年龄和阅读能力的调节因素。使用书面方式(如阅读、写作)进行的形态学评估比口语评估更能预测单词阅读结果。与不考察拼写准确性的评估相比,形态拼写评估更能预测单词阅读和阅读理解的结果。年龄是形态学与单词阅读之间关系的一个重要调节因素,因此年龄较小的儿童比年龄较大的儿童之间的关系更为密切。年龄较小的儿童在多个任务维度与阅读理解之间也表现出较高的关系,包括口头任务、无解码任务和提供上下文线索的任务。这些发现对今后旨在提高儿童阅读成果的形态学干预研究具有重要意义,尤其是在形态学教学中使用正字法和拼写法。
{"title":"Morphological assessment features and their relations to reading: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study","authors":"Gal Kaldes ,&nbsp;Elizabeth L. Tighe ,&nbsp;MaryAnn Romski ,&nbsp;Therese D. Pigott ,&nbsp;Christina Doan Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100602","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100602","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units of language (e.g., affixes, base words) that express grammatical and semantic information. Additionally, morphological knowledge is significantly related to children's word reading and reading comprehension skills. Researchers have broadly assessed morphological knowledge by using a wide range of tasks and stimuli, which has influenced the interpretation of the relations between morphological knowledge and reading outcomes. This review of 103 studies used meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) to investigate the relations between commonly occurring morphological knowledge assessment features (e.g., written versus oral, spelling versus no spelling) in the literature to reading outcomes, including word reading and reading comprehension. Meta-regression techniques were used to examine moderators of age and reading ability. Morphological assessments that used a written modality (e.g., reading, writing) were more predictive of word reading outcomes than those administered orally. Assessments of morphological spelling were more predictive of both word reading and reading comprehension outcomes than those that did not examine spelling accuracy. Age was a significant moderator of the relation between morphology and word reading, such that the relation was stronger for the younger than the older children. Younger children also demonstrated higher relations between multiple task dimensions and reading comprehension, including oral tasks, tasks without decoding, and tasks that provided context clues. These findings have important implications for future morphological intervention studies aimed to improve children's reading outcomes, in particular the use of orthography and spelling within the context of teaching morphology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100602"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140182404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mathematic skills in low birth weight or preterm birth: A meta-analysis 低出生体重儿或早产儿的数学能力:荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100603
Mónica Gutiérrez-Ortega , Verónica López-Fernández , Javier Tubío , Sandra Santiago-Ramajo
{"title":"Mathematic skills in low birth weight or preterm birth: A meta-analysis","authors":"Mónica Gutiérrez-Ortega ,&nbsp;Verónica López-Fernández ,&nbsp;Javier Tubío ,&nbsp;Sandra Santiago-Ramajo","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100603","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100603","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100603"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140182407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review 开放式探究对学生科学学习的影响:系统文献综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601
Norsyazwani Muhamad Dah , Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor , Muhammad Zulfadhli Kamarudin , Saripah Salbiah Syed Abdul Azziz

Open inquiry is the fourth and highest level of an inquiry-based approach in science teaching and learning. Although previous research has highlighted several benefits of open inquiry, thus far, no studies have comprehensively reviewed its impacts using systematic and rigorous methodologies. Thus, the central aim of this review study was to develop a better understanding of the impacts of an open inquiry approach on students' learning in science. The search strategy was restricted to articles published in established scholarly databases (WOS, Scopus and ERIC), following the seven steps in conducting a systematic literature review process in educational research. As a result, 24 articles were extracted and qualified for inclusion in this review study. Finally, a thematic analysis was conducted to analyse the articles and five themes were generated: i) students' conceptual understanding, ii) students' motivation, iii) students' attitudes towards science, iv) students' scientific and thinking skills, and v) students' science literacy and other science-related skills. Although open inquiry positively impacted students' learning in science, the reviewed article also reported some challenges in its implementation, notably the need for classroom management, flexible teaching and learning, teacher-student interaction and teacher support. This review study provides a significant contribution to science education research, indicating that the highest level of an inquiry-based approach may not be the ‘best’ approach. However, this review offers a future opportunity for policymakers, teacher educators, science education academics, NGOs, science teachers, and other interested parties to promote inquiry pedagogy to improve students' learning in science.

开放式探究是科学教学中探究式教学法的第四个层次,也是最高层次。尽管以往的研究已经强调了开放式探究的若干益处,但迄今为止,还没有研究采用系统、严谨的方法对其影响进行过全面回顾。因此,本综述研究的中心目的是更好地了解开放式探究方法对学生科学学习的影响。搜索策略仅限于已建立的学术数据库(WOS、Scopus 和 ERIC)中发表的文章,并遵循教育研究中进行系统文献综述过程的七个步骤。结果,共摘录了 24 篇文章,符合纳入本综述研究的条件。最后,对这些文章进行了主题分析,并产生了五个主题:i) 学生的概念理解;ii) 学生的动机;iii) 学生对科学的态度;iv) 学生的科学和思维能力;v) 学生的科学素养和其他科学相关技能。虽然开放式探究对学生的科学学习产生了积极影响,但综述文章也报告了其实施过程中的一些挑战,特别是课堂管理、灵活教学、师生互动和教师支持等方面的需求。本综述研究为科学教育研究做出了重要贡献,表明以探究为基础的方法的最高水平可能是 "最佳 "方法。不过,本综述为政策制定者、教师教育者、科学教育学者、非政府组织、科学教师和其他有关各方提供了一个未来的机会,以促进探究教学法,改善学生的科学学习。
{"title":"The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review","authors":"Norsyazwani Muhamad Dah ,&nbsp;Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor ,&nbsp;Muhammad Zulfadhli Kamarudin ,&nbsp;Saripah Salbiah Syed Abdul Azziz","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Open inquiry is the fourth and highest level of an inquiry-based approach in science teaching and learning. Although previous research has highlighted several benefits of open inquiry, thus far, <em>no</em> studies have comprehensively reviewed its impacts using systematic and rigorous methodologies. Thus, the central aim of this review study was to develop a better understanding of the impacts of an open inquiry approach on students' learning in science. The search strategy was restricted to articles published in established scholarly databases (WOS, Scopus and ERIC), following the seven steps in conducting a systematic literature review process in educational research. As a result, 24 articles were extracted and qualified for inclusion in this review study. Finally, a thematic analysis was conducted to analyse the articles and five themes were generated: i) students' conceptual understanding, ii) students' motivation, iii) students' attitudes towards science, iv) students' scientific and thinking skills, and v) students' science literacy and other science-related skills. Although open inquiry positively impacted students' learning in science, the reviewed article also reported some challenges in its implementation, notably the need for classroom management, flexible teaching and learning, teacher-student interaction and teacher support. This review study provides a significant contribution to science education research, indicating that the highest level of an inquiry-based approach may <em>not</em> be the ‘best’ approach. However, this review offers a future opportunity for policymakers, teacher educators, science education academics, NGOs, science teachers, and other interested parties to promote inquiry pedagogy to improve students' learning in science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100601"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X24000101/pdfft?md5=31442efd1e02a076f7d10dc700f7263e&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X24000101-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140043749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis of almost 40 Years of research: Unreleasing the power of written expression in students with learning disabilities 近 40 年研究的荟萃分析:释放学习障碍学生书面表达的力量
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100592
Vasiliki Kokkali, Faye Antoniou

The current meta-analysis aims at identifying the most effective interventions for students with Learning Disabilities (LD) in improving writing expression over the last 40 years. Specifically, the main purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of interventions focused on writing and integrated reading and writing for students in Grades PreK-12. The review examined a total of 39 experimental and quasi-experimental studies to determine which interventions demonstrated greater effectiveness in enhancing student outcomes. An average effect size (ES) was calculated for all 44 interventions. Additionally, average effect sizes were calculated for 12 intervention categories: sentence combining instruction, pre-writing activities and strategy instruction, process writing without modeling, adding self-regulation to strategy instruction, feedback, no feedback, goal setting, no goal setting, peer tutoring, no peer tutoring, self-efficacy and no self-efficacy. The findings demonstrated that the interventions consistently improved students' writing quality, with the addition of self-regulation to strategy instruction proving highly effective. Moreover, it was found that multicomponent programs incorporating different practices demonstrated their effectiveness in enhancing written expression. Positive outcomes were obtained by implementing interventions into practice in small groups through systematically organized sessions and encouraging cooperation between researchers and educators.

当前的荟萃分析旨在确定过去 40 年中针对学习障碍(LD)学生提高写作表达能力的最有效干预措施。具体来说,本综述的主要目的是评估针对学前班至 12 年级学生的写作和综合阅读与写作干预措施的有效性。综述共考察了 39 项实验和准实验研究,以确定哪些干预措施在提高学生成绩方面更有效。计算了所有 44 项干预措施的平均效应大小 (ES)。此外,还计算了 12 个干预类别的平均效应大小:句子组合教学、写作前活动和策略教学、无示范的过程写作、在策略教学中加入自我调节、反馈、无反馈、目标设定、无目标设定、同伴辅导、无同伴辅导、自我效能和无自我效能。研究结果表明,这些干预措施持续提高了学生的写作质量,其中在策略指导中加入自我调节被证明非常有效。此外,研究还发现,包含不同实践的多成分计划在提高书面表达能力方面效果显著。通过系统地组织课程,在小组中实施干预措施,并鼓励研究人员和教育工作者之间开展合作,取得了积极的成果。
{"title":"A meta-analysis of almost 40 Years of research: Unreleasing the power of written expression in students with learning disabilities","authors":"Vasiliki Kokkali,&nbsp;Faye Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100592","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100592","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current meta-analysis aims at identifying the most effective interventions for students with Learning Disabilities (LD) in improving writing expression over the last 40 years. Specifically, the main purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of interventions focused on writing and integrated reading and writing for students in Grades PreK-12. The review examined a total of 39 experimental and quasi-experimental studies to determine which interventions demonstrated greater effectiveness in enhancing student outcomes. An average effect size (ES) was calculated for all 44 interventions. Additionally, average effect sizes were calculated for 12 intervention categories: sentence combining instruction, pre-writing activities and strategy instruction, process writing without modeling, adding self-regulation to strategy instruction, feedback, no feedback, goal setting, no goal setting, peer tutoring, no peer tutoring, self-efficacy and no self-efficacy. The findings demonstrated that the interventions consistently improved students' writing quality, with the addition of self-regulation to strategy instruction proving highly effective. Moreover, it was found that multicomponent programs incorporating different practices demonstrated their effectiveness in enhancing written expression. Positive outcomes were obtained by implementing interventions into practice in small groups through systematically organized sessions and encouraging cooperation between researchers and educators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100592"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139511046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interpersonal educational neuroscience: A scoping review of the literature 人际教育神经科学:文献综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100593
Yimeng Zhang , Yinying Hu , Fanshu Ma , Haichan Cui , Xiaojun Cheng , Yafeng Pan

Education neuroscience merges insights from education, psychology, and neuroscience to understand how the brain learns, processes information, and retains knowledge. While this field entails aspects like individual cognitive development and skill acquisition, it lacks clarity on the mechanisms for true social learning and teaching. To fill this gap, our article examines how the rapidly growing area of interpersonal educational neuroscience, which shifts the focus from single learners to learning interactions between individuals, is (and could be) contributing to a refined account for learning in social settings. We conducted a literature review of interpersonal neuroscience in relation to learning and instruction, through databases including Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We found that interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS), within a widespread fronto-temporo-parietal network, between teachers and students and among students, can predict learning performance and is biased by characteristics of teaching. The functional implications of IBS, its challenges, and future opportunities for its applications to pedagogical practices are discussed.

教育神经科学融合了教育学、心理学和神经科学的见解,以了解大脑如何学习、处理信息和保留知识。虽然这一领域涉及个人认知发展和技能习得等方面,但对真正的社会学习和教学机制却缺乏清晰的认识。为了填补这一空白,我们的文章探讨了快速发展的人际教育神经科学领域是如何(以及可能如何)促进完善社会环境下的学习解释的,该领域将重点从单个学习者转移到个人之间的学习互动。我们通过 Pubmed、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 等数据库,对与学习和教学相关的人际神经科学进行了文献综述。我们发现,在广泛的前额颞顶网络中,教师与学生之间以及学生与学生之间的人际大脑同步(IBS)可以预测学习成绩,并受到教学特点的影响。本文讨论了人际脑同步的功能意义、挑战以及未来应用于教学实践的机会。
{"title":"Interpersonal educational neuroscience: A scoping review of the literature","authors":"Yimeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Yinying Hu ,&nbsp;Fanshu Ma ,&nbsp;Haichan Cui ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Cheng ,&nbsp;Yafeng Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100593","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100593","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Education neuroscience merges insights from education, psychology, and neuroscience to understand how the brain learns, processes information, and retains knowledge. While this field entails aspects like individual cognitive development and skill acquisition, it lacks clarity on the mechanisms for true social learning and teaching. To fill this gap, our article examines how the rapidly growing area of </span><em>interpersonal educational neuroscience</em><span>, which shifts the focus from single learners to learning interactions between individuals, is (and could be) contributing to a refined account for learning in social settings. We conducted a literature review of interpersonal neuroscience in relation to learning and instruction, through databases including Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We found that interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS), within a widespread fronto-temporo-parietal network, between teachers and students and among students, can predict learning performance and is biased by characteristics of teaching. The functional implications of IBS, its challenges, and future opportunities for its applications to pedagogical practices are discussed.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100593"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139573854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to De Jong et al.’s (2023) paper “Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction” 对 De Jong 等人(2023 年)的论文 "让我们谈谈证据--探究式教学与直接教学相结合的理由 "的回应
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100584
John Sweller , Lin Zhang , Greg Ashman , William Cobern , Paul A. Kirschner

De Jong et al. (2023) objected to the evidence presented by Zhang et al. (2022) to support their concerns about the unreserved acceptance and promotion of inquiry-based learning and problem solving in current policy documents related to the teaching of science. In their response, De Jong et al. (2023) reiterated their advocacy for inquiry approaches, arguing that an emphasis on a mixture of inquiry learning and explicit instruction is needed. The present article rebuts De Jong et al. (2023), in which we: 1) challenge their view of and approach to scientific methods in establishing the efficacy of different instructional approaches; 2) indicate that an underpinning theory to explain the cognitive machinery that drives inquiry-based instructional approaches is missing from their argument; and 3) address the empirical issues arising in their argument. We also highlight potential agreement with De Jong et al. (2023) on the essential role of explicit instruction and thus raise a call to the field to revise current science educational policies and standards to reflect such a role. Our agreements and disagreements advance the debate to a new focus concerning when and how inquiry-based learning and explicit instruction should be used and combined. While De Jong et al. (2023), in their theory-free paper, provided no answer to how explicit instruction and inquiry learning should be combined, we offer our suggestions based on evolutionary psychology and the expertise reversal effect from cognitive load theory.

De Jong等人(2023)反对Zhang等人(2022)提出的证据,这些证据支持他们对当前与科学教学相关的政策文件中毫无保留地接受和促进研究性学习和问题解决的担忧。在他们的回应中,De Jong等人(2023)重申了他们对研究性方法的支持,认为需要强调研究性学习和明确教学的结合。本文反驳了De Jong等人(2023)的观点,其中我们:1)挑战他们对科学方法的看法和方法,以确定不同教学方法的有效性;2)表明在他们的论证中缺少解释驱动探究性教学方法的认知机制的基础理论;3)解决他们争论中出现的经验问题。我们还强调了与De Jong等人(2023)关于明确教学的重要作用的潜在共识,从而呼吁该领域修改当前的科学教育政策和标准,以反映这种作用。我们的共识和分歧将辩论推进到一个新的焦点,即探究性学习和显性教学应该何时以及如何使用和结合。虽然De Jong等人(2023)在他们没有理论的论文中没有回答明确的教学和探究性学习应该如何结合,但我们基于进化心理学和认知负荷理论的专业知识逆转效应提出了我们的建议。
{"title":"Response to De Jong et al.’s (2023) paper “Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction”","authors":"John Sweller ,&nbsp;Lin Zhang ,&nbsp;Greg Ashman ,&nbsp;William Cobern ,&nbsp;Paul A. Kirschner","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100584","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100584","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>De Jong et al. (2023) objected to the evidence presented by Zhang et al. (2022) to support their concerns about the unreserved acceptance and promotion of inquiry-based learning and problem solving in current policy documents related to the teaching of science. In their response, De Jong et al. (2023) reiterated their advocacy for inquiry approaches, arguing that an emphasis on a mixture of inquiry learning and explicit instruction is needed. The present article rebuts De Jong et al. (2023), in which we: 1) challenge their view of and approach to scientific methods in establishing the efficacy of different instructional approaches; 2) indicate that an underpinning theory to explain the cognitive machinery that drives inquiry-based instructional approaches is missing from their argument; and 3) address the empirical issues arising in their argument. We also highlight potential agreement with De Jong et al. (2023) on the essential role of explicit instruction and thus raise a call to the field to revise current science educational policies and standards to reflect such a role. Our agreements and disagreements advance the debate to a new focus concerning when and how inquiry-based learning and explicit instruction should be used and combined. While De Jong et al. (2023), in their theory-free paper, provided no answer to how explicit instruction and inquiry learning should be combined, we offer our suggestions based on evolutionary psychology and the expertise reversal effect from cognitive load theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100584"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000775/pdfft?md5=c58809fd5ab1ab4dac376031279ab6f8&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X23000775-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138679119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving skills: A systematic review of empirical research 基于计算机的协作解决问题技能评估:实证研究系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100591
Huanyou Chai , Tianhui Hu , Li Wu

Given the widespread concern on collaborative problem solving (CPS) skills, there has been an increasing interest in the last few years to explore how to assess them with digital technologies. This study systematically reviewed how CPS skills have been assessed with digital technologies in the literature. A total of 40 articles were reviewed to analyze specific computer-based assessment instruments of CPS skills from four perspectives: research context, theoretical model for assessment, assessment type, and reliability and validity evidence. The results indicate that most tests target a sample of less than 500 junior students. Nine theoretical models are employed for assessing CPS skills, most of which treat these skills as an explicit combination of social and cognitive skills and are applied to a limited range of participants' age levels, collaboration features, and team compositions. A total of 22 tests have been employed and fallen into four types, i.e., the ones with specific predefined messages in human-agent mode, and those with online chat box, videoconferencing, and face-to-face collaboration in human-human mode. Each type of these tests demonstrates great diversities in participants’ age levels, types of CPS task(s), team compositions, types of assessment data, and methods of data recording and scoring. A certain number of tests lack reliability and validity evidence. Our findings are expected to benefit relevant researchers and test developers in terms of providing suggestions for future research which include testing the applicability of theoretical models for assessing CPS skills across a wide range of assessment contexts. In addition, future researchers should improve the development, data processing, and report of those four types of computer-based assessment instruments of CPS skills through different approaches, respectively.

鉴于协作式问题解决(CPS)技能受到广泛关注,近几年来,人们越来越关注如何利用数字技术对其进行评估。本研究系统回顾了文献中如何利用数字技术评估 CPS 技能。共查阅了 40 篇文章,从研究背景、评估理论模型、评估类型、信度和效度证据四个方面分析了基于计算机的 CPS 技能评估工具。结果表明,大多数测试的目标样本少于 500 名初三学生。采用了九种理论模型来评估 CPS 技能,其中大多数将这些技能视为社会技能和认知技能的明确组合,并适用于参与者的年龄水平、协作特征和团队组成等有限范围。共采用了 22 项测试,分为四种类型,即在人-代理模式下使用特定的预定义信息的测试,以及在人-人模式下使用在线聊天框、视频会议和面对面协作的测试。每种类型的测试在参与者的年龄水平、CPS 任务类型、团队组成、评估数据类型以及数据记录和评分方法等方面都有很大差异。一定数量的测试缺乏可靠性和有效性证据。我们的研究结果可望对相关研究人员和测试开发人员有所裨益,为今后的研究提供建议,包括测试理论模型在各种评估环境中评估 CPS 技能的适用性。此外,未来的研究人员应分别通过不同的方法改进这四类基于计算机的 CPS 技能评估工具的开发、数据处理和报告。
{"title":"Computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving skills: A systematic review of empirical research","authors":"Huanyou Chai ,&nbsp;Tianhui Hu ,&nbsp;Li Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100591","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100591","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the widespread concern on collaborative problem solving (CPS) skills, there has been an increasing interest in the last few years to explore how to assess them with digital technologies. This study systematically reviewed how CPS skills have been assessed with digital technologies in the literature. A total of 40 articles were reviewed to analyze specific computer-based assessment instruments of CPS skills from four perspectives: research context, theoretical model for assessment, assessment type, and reliability and validity evidence. The results indicate that most tests target a sample of less than 500 junior students. Nine theoretical models are employed for assessing CPS skills, most of which treat these skills as an explicit combination of social and cognitive skills and are applied to a limited range of participants' age levels, collaboration features, and team compositions. A total of 22 tests have been employed and fallen into four types, i.e., the ones with specific predefined messages in human-agent mode, and those with online chat box, videoconferencing, and face-to-face collaboration in human-human mode. Each type of these tests demonstrates great diversities in participants’ age levels, types of CPS task(s), team compositions, types of assessment data, and methods of data recording and scoring. A certain number of tests lack reliability and validity evidence. Our findings are expected to benefit relevant researchers and test developers in terms of providing suggestions for future research which include testing the applicability of theoretical models for assessing CPS skills across a wide range of assessment contexts. In addition, future researchers should improve the development, data processing, and report of those four types of computer-based assessment instruments of CPS skills through different approaches, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100591"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139061362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Educational Research Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1