Pub Date : 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103932
Yanting Wu, Lin Jiang
Despite the recognized importance of flow experience in enhancing language learning outcomes, L2 writing remains an understudied domain where learners consistently report lower flow levels compared to other language tasks (Zuniga, 2023). This study addresses two gaps: (1) the overreliance on quantitative approaches and non-linguistic theoretical frameworks in existing flow studies, and (2) the less attention given to flow in writing contexts. Focusing specifically on story continuation writing, the present study employed a qualitative analysis of 108 university students' reflective diaries to examine the phenomenological characteristics and influencing factors of flow experience. Three features of flow experience emerged from the data: transcendence of self, complex emotions, and a flood of creative flow. The study further reveals that inherent task characteristics, such as accessible linguistic models, interestingness of story, clues, and suspense setting, to name just a few, effectively stimulate learners' interest and then help learners enter the flow state. Furthermore, balancing skills and challenges through environmental control and mastery of preceding texts' languages and clues, goal-setting through outlining, and immediate feedback through creative breakthroughs also significantly affect flow experience.
{"title":"EFL learners’ flow experience in story continuation writing","authors":"Yanting Wu, Lin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103932","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103932","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the recognized importance of flow experience in enhancing language learning outcomes, L2 writing remains an understudied domain where learners consistently report lower flow levels compared to other language tasks (Zuniga, 2023). This study addresses two gaps: (1) the overreliance on quantitative approaches and non-linguistic theoretical frameworks in existing flow studies, and (2) the less attention given to flow in writing contexts. Focusing specifically on story continuation writing, the present study employed a qualitative analysis of 108 university students' reflective diaries to examine the phenomenological characteristics and influencing factors of flow experience. Three features of flow experience emerged from the data: transcendence of self, complex emotions, and a flood of creative flow. The study further reveals that inherent task characteristics, such as accessible linguistic models, interestingness of story, clues, and suspense setting, to name just a few, effectively stimulate learners' interest and then help learners enter the flow state. Furthermore, balancing skills and challenges through environmental control and mastery of preceding texts' languages and clues, goal-setting through outlining, and immediate feedback through creative breakthroughs also significantly affect flow experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103932"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-22DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103930
Nari Kim , Ming Ming Cheung , Vashti Wai Yu Lee , Peter I. De Costa
Consistent with recent calls to critically recognize how digital technologies shape ideologies, inequities, and exclusion, we present findings from our critical collaborative autoethnography. Performing a dual role of being autoethnographers and critical friends to each other (Alan et al., 2021), we complemented “internal” data generated from our memory with “external” data from outside sources, such as documents and artifacts from our teaching, to push our thinking further. By engaging in constructive dialogue with and among ourselves, we explored in a multivocal manner (Lapadat, 2017) how the dual identity roles we inhabit as transnational teachers and teacher educators shaped our understanding of critical digital literacy (CDL). We revisited our prior experiences as teachers—when our awareness of CDL was limited—and reflected on how, as teacher educators, we can facilitate its development through our current work with pre-service teachers. Specifically, by integrating CDL into our recent teacher education work, we demonstrate how our pre-service teachers (a) critically examined how YouTube's algorithm created filter bubbles and reinforced linguistic and cultural hierarchies, and (b) reinterpreted deficit discourses about emergent bi/multilingual learners through a Reddit exit ticket activity. By adopting a CDL lens within the framework of platform studies (Nichols & Garcia, 2022), this study thus also addresses the political-economic and technological dimensions of platforms, which remain relatively underexplored. Through this approach, we aim to expand the focus of critical digital literacy discussions beyond learners to include teachers and teacher educators. We close with a call for incorporating CDL development into pre-service teacher education programs.
与最近呼吁批判性地认识数字技术如何塑造意识形态、不平等和排斥一致,我们提出了我们批判性合作的自我民族志的发现。扮演着自我民族志学家和彼此重要朋友的双重角色(Alan et al., 2021),我们用来自外部来源的“外部”数据(如来自我们教学的文件和文物)补充了从我们的记忆中产生的“内部”数据,以进一步推动我们的思维。通过与我们之间进行建设性对话,我们以多种方式探索了我们作为跨国教师和教师教育者的双重身份角色如何塑造了我们对关键数字素养(CDL)的理解(Lapadat, 2017)。我们回顾了我们以前作为教师的经历——当时我们对CDL的认识是有限的——并反思了作为教师教育者,我们如何通过目前与职前教师的合作促进CDL的发展。具体而言,通过将CDL整合到我们最近的教师教育工作中,我们展示了我们的职前教师如何(a)批判性地检查YouTube算法如何产生过滤气泡并加强语言和文化等级,以及(b)通过Reddit退场票活动重新解释关于新兴双/多语言学习者的缺陷话语。通过在平台研究框架内采用CDL视角(Nichols &; Garcia, 2022),本研究还解决了平台的政治-经济和技术维度,这些方面的探索仍然相对不足。通过这种方法,我们的目标是将关键数字素养讨论的焦点从学习者扩展到教师和教师教育者。我们最后呼吁将CDL发展纳入职前教师教育计划。
{"title":"Centering critical digital literacy in the lives of language teaching professionals: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration","authors":"Nari Kim , Ming Ming Cheung , Vashti Wai Yu Lee , Peter I. De Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103930","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103930","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consistent with recent calls to critically recognize how digital technologies shape ideologies, inequities, and exclusion, we present findings from our critical collaborative autoethnography. Performing a dual role of being autoethnographers and critical friends to each other (Alan et al., 2021), we complemented “internal” data generated from our memory with “external” data from outside sources, such as documents and artifacts from our teaching, to push our thinking further. By engaging in constructive dialogue with and among ourselves, we explored in a multivocal manner (Lapadat, 2017) how the dual identity roles we inhabit as transnational teachers and teacher educators shaped our understanding of critical digital literacy (CDL). We revisited our prior experiences as teachers—when our awareness of CDL was limited—and reflected on how, as teacher educators, we can facilitate its development through our current work with pre-service teachers. Specifically, by integrating CDL into our recent teacher education work, we demonstrate how our pre-service teachers (a) critically examined how YouTube's algorithm created filter bubbles and reinforced linguistic and cultural hierarchies, and (b) reinterpreted deficit discourses about emergent bi/multilingual learners through a Reddit exit ticket activity. By adopting a CDL lens within the framework of platform studies (Nichols & Garcia, 2022), this study thus also addresses the political-economic and technological dimensions of platforms, which remain relatively underexplored. Through this approach, we aim to expand the focus of critical digital literacy discussions beyond learners to include teachers and teacher educators. We close with a call for incorporating CDL development into pre-service teacher education programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103930"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103925
Xuyan Qiu , Gavin Bui , Xinxin Yao
The behavioural dimension of task engagement, defined as learners' concentration, attention, and efforts during task execution, plays a vital role in second language acquisition. This study explores how task type (narrative vs. decision-making tasks) and the number of elements (more vs. fewer task elements) affect L2 learners' behavioural engagement, and investigates how learners with different L2 grit dispositions engage in tasks of varying types and element numbers. Sixty English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners performed two narrative tasks and two decision-making tasks involving different numbers of elements in synchronous video-based computer-mediated communication. They also completed a L2 grit scale, measuring their persistence of effort (POE) and consistency of interest (COI). Linear mixed-effects models were employed to examine the effects of task type, number of elements, and L2 grit on behavioural engagement. Task type significantly impacted behavioural engagement, with narrative tasks fostering higher engagement than decision-making tasks. Learners also showed greater engagement in tasks with more elements, but no interaction effects were found between task type and number of elements. L2 grit, particularly COI, affected the impact of task type on behavioural engagement, with gritty learners demonstrating greater engagement in narrative tasks. These findings highlight the crucial role of L2 grit in behavioural engagement across different levels of complexity and types, offering pedagogical insights for tailoring tasks to learners’ unique characteristics.
{"title":"Task type, task elements, and L2 grit: Predictors of ESL learners’ behavioural engagement in computer-mediated oral tasks","authors":"Xuyan Qiu , Gavin Bui , Xinxin Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103925","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103925","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behavioural dimension of task engagement, defined as learners' concentration, attention, and efforts during task execution, plays a vital role in second language acquisition. This study explores how task type (narrative vs. decision-making tasks) and the number of elements (more vs. fewer task elements) affect L2 learners' behavioural engagement, and investigates how learners with different L2 grit dispositions engage in tasks of varying types and element numbers. Sixty English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners performed two narrative tasks and two decision-making tasks involving different numbers of elements in synchronous video-based computer-mediated communication. They also completed a L2 grit scale, measuring their persistence of effort (POE) and consistency of interest (COI). Linear mixed-effects models were employed to examine the effects of task type, number of elements, and L2 grit on behavioural engagement. Task type significantly impacted behavioural engagement, with narrative tasks fostering higher engagement than decision-making tasks. Learners also showed greater engagement in tasks with more elements, but no interaction effects were found between task type and number of elements. L2 grit, particularly COI, affected the impact of task type on behavioural engagement, with gritty learners demonstrating greater engagement in narrative tasks. These findings highlight the crucial role of L2 grit in behavioural engagement across different levels of complexity and types, offering pedagogical insights for tailoring tasks to learners’ unique characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103925"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103929
Hua Cai, Wei Ren
Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have underscored their potential in second language (L2) pragmatics instruction. This study conducts a comparative analysis of 40 ChatGPT-generated and 40 Chinese EFL learner-produced online continuation reviews, systematically examining pragmatic internal modification across emotional valences. The findings reveal that: 1) In positive reviews, ChatGPT demonstrated superior diversity of lexical intensifiers and appropriate punctuation usage, whereas learners exhibited greater contextual sensitivity in modulating punctuation emphasis across different levels of emotion; 2) In negative reviews, ChatGPT displayed stronger command of genre-specific modality hedges and understaters, but lagged in flexibility in syntactic negating device; 3) Valence effects were stronger on ChatGPT's modification choices compared to EFL learners, suggesting GenAI's priority to predictability and safety and learners' emphasis on authenticity and adaptability. These findings not only enhance our understanding of LLM's pragmatic production capability with regard to internal modification but also propose a tripartite integration framework for ChatGPT in L2 pragmatics instruction: as a pragmatic input facilitator, automated feedback provider, and conversational tutor.
{"title":"A comparative study of pragmatic performance of internal modification in continuation tasks of online reviews: Generative AI versus EFL learners","authors":"Hua Cai, Wei Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103929","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103929","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have underscored their potential in second language (L2) pragmatics instruction. This study conducts a comparative analysis of 40 ChatGPT-generated and 40 Chinese EFL learner-produced online continuation reviews, systematically examining pragmatic internal modification across emotional valences. The findings reveal that: 1) In positive reviews, ChatGPT demonstrated superior diversity of lexical intensifiers and appropriate punctuation usage, whereas learners exhibited greater contextual sensitivity in modulating punctuation emphasis across different levels of emotion; 2) In negative reviews, ChatGPT displayed stronger command of genre-specific modality hedges and understaters, but lagged in flexibility in syntactic negating device; 3) Valence effects were stronger on ChatGPT's modification choices compared to EFL learners, suggesting GenAI's priority to predictability and safety and learners' emphasis on authenticity and adaptability. These findings not only enhance our understanding of LLM's pragmatic production capability with regard to internal modification but also propose a tripartite integration framework for ChatGPT in L2 pragmatics instruction: as a pragmatic input facilitator, automated feedback provider, and conversational tutor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103929"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145624232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103926
Chuanwei Huo , Jason M. Stephens , Lawrence Jun Zhang
Directed Motivational Currents (DMCs), intense, sustained, goal-directed motivation, have emerged as a noteworthy construct in second language (L2) motivation research. While they hold potential to drive exceptional learning outcomes, more empirical evidence is needed on their initiation and predictors, particularly in non-Western contexts. This study investigated the prevalence and predictors of DMCs among Chinese EFL learners at the secondary (n = 397) and tertiary (n = 343) levels. Overall, 73.5 % of participants reported DMC experiences across contexts, with 64.6 % specifically affirming such motivation during English learning projects; conversely, only 6.8 % (n = 50) reported never experiencing DMCs in English learning. In the English learning context, DMC intensity correlated with expectancy for success, intrinsic interest, utility value, parental encouragement, and teacher/course evaluations; however, hierarchical regression identified expectancy for success and parental encouragement as the strongest predictors after controlling for demographics. MANOVA showed that students’ choice of major was significantly related to the personal experience of DMC in English learning, and paired t-tests confirmed significant English proficiency gains following such experiences. These findings highlight the prevalence of DMCs across educational stages and extend DMC theory by underscoring the role of situational and interpersonal factors in shaping these intense motivational states.
{"title":"The prevalence and predictors of directed motivational currents among secondary and tertiary L2 english learners in China","authors":"Chuanwei Huo , Jason M. Stephens , Lawrence Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103926","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103926","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Directed Motivational Currents (DMCs), intense, sustained, goal-directed motivation, have emerged as a noteworthy construct in second language (L2) motivation research. While they hold potential to drive exceptional learning outcomes, more empirical evidence is needed on their initiation and predictors, particularly in non-Western contexts. This study investigated the prevalence and predictors of DMCs among Chinese EFL learners at the secondary (n = 397) and tertiary (n = 343) levels. Overall, 73.5 % of participants reported DMC experiences across contexts, with 64.6 % specifically affirming such motivation during English learning projects; conversely, only 6.8 % (n = 50) reported never experiencing DMCs in English learning. In the English learning context, DMC intensity correlated with expectancy for success, intrinsic interest, utility value, parental encouragement, and teacher/course evaluations; however, hierarchical regression identified expectancy for success and parental encouragement as the strongest predictors after controlling for demographics. MANOVA showed that students’ choice of major was significantly related to the personal experience of DMC in English learning, and paired t-tests confirmed significant English proficiency gains following such experiences. These findings highlight the prevalence of DMCs across educational stages and extend DMC theory by underscoring the role of situational and interpersonal factors in shaping these intense motivational states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103926"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145691430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103921
Carmen Muñoz , Ariane Ruiz de Apodaca
Studies of language learning aptitude with young learners are scarce. This study aims to contribute to this area by examining the role of aptitude in foreign language vocabulary acquisition among primary school learners and comparing it to the well-established predictive role of vocabulary size. Participants were 95 Catalan-Spanish bilingual learners of English (ages ranged from 10 to 12 years old). We examined two different measures of aptitude – LLAMA_B (from the LLAMA Battery) and Number Learning from the Catalan adaptation of the Elementary Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT-EC) – and found that the former was a stronger discriminator of individual differences in aptitude for this learner group than the latter. Additionally, we compared the predictive strength of LLAMA_B with that of previous vocabulary size, as measured by a Vocabulary Size Test, for two vocabulary learning tasks: a Flashcard task (verbal-visual associations) and a Wordlist task (verbal-verbal associations). Both LLAMA_B and previous vocabulary size appeared as significant predictors of vocabulary learning, confirming the predictive strength of vocabulary size and yielding evidence for the appropriateness of LLAMA_B for children at this age. Finally, we examined the potential impact of shared modality between LLAMA_B and the Flashcard task but did not find the expected effect. The discussion considers the role of multimodality and cognitive load, among other factors, and concludes that further research is needed to precisely assess the suitability of aptitude tests for different ages within young learners.
{"title":"Using LLAMA_B as a predictor of L2 vocabulary learning by young learners","authors":"Carmen Muñoz , Ariane Ruiz de Apodaca","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103921","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103921","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies of language learning aptitude with young learners are scarce. This study aims to contribute to this area by examining the role of aptitude in foreign language vocabulary acquisition among primary school learners and comparing it to the well-established predictive role of vocabulary size. Participants were 95 Catalan-Spanish bilingual learners of English (ages ranged from 10 to 12 years old). We examined two different measures of aptitude – LLAMA_B (from the LLAMA Battery) and Number Learning from the Catalan adaptation of the Elementary Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT-EC) – and found that the former was a stronger discriminator of individual differences in aptitude for this learner group than the latter. Additionally, we compared the predictive strength of LLAMA_B with that of previous vocabulary size, as measured by a Vocabulary Size Test, for two vocabulary learning tasks: a Flashcard task (verbal-visual associations) and a Wordlist task (verbal-verbal associations). Both LLAMA_B and previous vocabulary size appeared as significant predictors of vocabulary learning, confirming the predictive strength of vocabulary size and yielding evidence for the appropriateness of LLAMA_B for children at this age. Finally, we examined the potential impact of shared modality between LLAMA_B and the Flashcard task but did not find the expected effect. The discussion considers the role of multimodality and cognitive load, among other factors, and concludes that further research is needed to precisely assess the suitability of aptitude tests for different ages within young learners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103921"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103922
Kotaro Takizawa , Shungo Suzuki
The aim of this study is to explore the validity of the Productive Academic Formulas Test (PAFT), developed from items in the Academic Formulas List (Simpson-Vlach & Ellis, 2010). A total of 110 Japanese undergraduate students learning English took the PAFT, the Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (PVLT; Laufer & Nation, 1999), and the Phrasal Vocabulary Size Test (PVST; Martinez, 2011). After calibrating the PAFT items using Rasch dichotomous modeling, the convergent and discriminant validity of the PAFT was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The four theoretical CFA models were tested: (1) single-factor model (vocabulary knowledge), (2) two-factor model (single vocabulary vs. multiword sequence), (3) two-factor model (receptive vocabulary vs. productive vocabulary), and (4) three-factor model (single vocabulary vs. productive multiword sequence vs. receptive multiword sequence). The predictive power of the PAFT was also examined by predicting L2 utterance fluency measures (speed, breakdown, and repair fluency) elicited from an argumentative speech task. The results indicated that the PAFT demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties (unidimensionality and high reliability) and construct validity as a measure of productive multiword sequence knowledge. Regression analyses with dominance analysis procedure revealed that the PVLT scores contributed most strongly to most of the fluency measures (dominance weight: 34.9 %–59.1 %), followed by the scores of PAFT (20.1 %–30.2 %) and PVST (13.2 %–45.1 %). Implications for vocabulary testing and for the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to fluency are discussed.
{"title":"Developing the Productive Academic Formulas Test: Evidence from Rasch and factor analysis and cognitive fluency analysis","authors":"Kotaro Takizawa , Shungo Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103922","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103922","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study is to explore the validity of the Productive Academic Formulas Test (PAFT), developed from items in the Academic Formulas List (Simpson-Vlach & Ellis, 2010). A total of 110 Japanese undergraduate students learning English took the PAFT, the Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (PVLT; Laufer & Nation, 1999), and the Phrasal Vocabulary Size Test (PVST; Martinez, 2011). After calibrating the PAFT items using Rasch dichotomous modeling, the convergent and discriminant validity of the PAFT was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The four theoretical CFA models were tested: (1) single-factor model (<em>vocabulary knowledge</em>), (2) two-factor model (<em>single vocabulary</em> vs. <em>multiword sequence</em>), (3) two-factor model (<em>receptive vocabulary</em> vs. <em>productive vocabulary</em>), and (4) three-factor model (<em>single vocabulary</em> vs. <em>productive multiword sequence</em> vs. <em>receptive multiword sequence</em>). The predictive power of the PAFT was also examined by predicting L2 utterance fluency measures (speed, breakdown, and repair fluency) elicited from an argumentative speech task. The results indicated that the PAFT demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties (unidimensionality and high reliability) and construct validity as a measure of productive multiword sequence knowledge. Regression analyses with dominance analysis procedure revealed that the PVLT scores contributed most strongly to most of the fluency measures (dominance weight: 34.9 %–59.1 %), followed by the scores of PAFT (20.1 %–30.2 %) and PVST (13.2 %–45.1 %). Implications for vocabulary testing and for the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to fluency are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103922"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103918
Aki Siegel
This study examines how laughter is used to manage interactional (in)competence during word search sequences in peer L2 English interactions. While research has highlighted the diverse roles of laughter in L1 interaction and L2 classroom discourse, little attention has been paid to its role in L2 peer talk, particularly in online environments. Drawing on 548 min of Zoom conversations among 16 university students in Sweden and Japan, this study employs conversation analysis (CA) to explore how laughter emerges in during word search sequences–moments where speakers display difficulty retrieving a lexical item. Analysis identifies four recurrent positions for laughter: post-candidate word, pre-candidate word, with candidate word, and post-word search marker. Findings show that laughter functions not merely as an affective marker, but as an interactional resource that can (a) display difficulty in lexical retrieval, (b) pre-emptively flag a candidate word as potentially problematic, and (c) invite interlocutor to join the word search. However, the effectiveness of laughter as an interactional resource depends on a shared context, explicit cues, and the affordances of online communication. In some cases, laughter failed to facilitate progressivity, leading to prolonged or abandoned searches. Beyond its interactional role, laughter also reveals tensions between speakers’ current linguistic repertoire and their awareness of the linguistic repertoire they need. The study argues that laughter reveals both interactional competence–through cooperative management of trouble–and interactional incompetence, through reliance on laughter and their interlocutor. The findings suggest the need to raise awareness of explicit word search markers to enhance communicative clarity.
{"title":"Managing interactional (In)competence through laughter in peer L2 word search sequences","authors":"Aki Siegel","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103918","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103918","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how laughter is used to manage interactional (in)competence during word search sequences in peer L2 English interactions. While research has highlighted the diverse roles of laughter in L1 interaction and L2 classroom discourse, little attention has been paid to its role in L2 peer talk, particularly in online environments. Drawing on 548 min of Zoom conversations among 16 university students in Sweden and Japan, this study employs conversation analysis (CA) to explore how laughter emerges in during word search sequences–moments where speakers display difficulty retrieving a lexical item. Analysis identifies four recurrent positions for laughter: post-candidate word, pre-candidate word, with candidate word, and post-word search marker. Findings show that laughter functions not merely as an affective marker, but as an interactional resource that can (a) display difficulty in lexical retrieval, (b) pre-emptively flag a candidate word as potentially problematic, and (c) invite interlocutor to join the word search. However, the effectiveness of laughter as an interactional resource depends on a shared context, explicit cues, and the affordances of online communication. In some cases, laughter failed to facilitate progressivity, leading to prolonged or abandoned searches. Beyond its interactional role, laughter also reveals tensions between speakers’ current linguistic repertoire and their awareness of the linguistic repertoire they need. The study argues that laughter reveals both interactional competence–through cooperative management of trouble–and interactional incompetence, through reliance on laughter and their interlocutor. The findings suggest the need to raise awareness of explicit word search markers to enhance communicative clarity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103918"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145528116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2025.103924
Eunseok Ro , Mika Ishino
{"title":"Doing the task, doing the relationship: Responses to self-assessment and advice in peer reflection on microteaching","authors":"Eunseok Ro , Mika Ishino","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103924","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103924","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103924"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145691431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}