首页 > 最新文献

System最新文献

英文 中文
The role of context in the word family debate 语境在词族辩论中的作用
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103453
Tim Stoeckel , Stuart McLean , Young Ae Kim , Yukie Shinhara , Allie Spencer Patterson

There has been debate regarding how to define the lexical unit for the receptive skills, with different levels of inclusiveness being possible depending on learner proficiency and pedagogical or research purpose. The most frequently-used definitions for L2 reading are the lemma, flemma, and Bauer and Nation's (1993) level-6 word family (WF6). When WF6 is used, it is assumed that if one family member is known, unfamiliar members can be understood when encountered in meaningful contexts. Past investigations of this assumption have been criticized for assessing knowledge of morphologically-related words only in isolation or in sentence-length contexts. The present study addressed this concern by examining Japanese university students' ability to understand related words in isolation, in limited-context sentences, and in page-length passages. The relationship between baseword and derivational form knowledge was weak, and the level of contextualization had little effect on this relationship. These findings corroborate past findings and support the use of limited-context assessment in research on the word family and the relationship between vocabulary and reading.

关于如何定义接受能力的词汇单位一直存在争议,根据学习者的水平和教学或研究目的,可以有不同程度的包容性。在 L2 阅读中,最常用的定义是词目、词组以及 Bauer 和 Nation(1993 年)的六级词族(WF6)。在使用 WF6 时,假定如果已知一个词族成员,那么在有意义的语境中遇到不熟悉的成员时就能理解。过去对这一假设的研究受到了批评,因为它只评估孤立的或句子长度语境中的词形相关词的知识。本研究通过考察日本大学生在孤立语境、有限语境句子和篇幅段落中理解相关词的能力,解决了这一问题。基词和派生形式知识之间的关系很弱,语境水平对这种关系的影响很小。这些发现证实了以往的研究结果,并支持在词族和词汇与阅读关系的研究中使用有限语境评估。
{"title":"The role of context in the word family debate","authors":"Tim Stoeckel ,&nbsp;Stuart McLean ,&nbsp;Young Ae Kim ,&nbsp;Yukie Shinhara ,&nbsp;Allie Spencer Patterson","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103453","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103453","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There has been debate regarding how to define the lexical unit for the receptive skills, with different levels of inclusiveness being possible depending on learner proficiency and pedagogical or research purpose. The most frequently-used definitions for L2 reading are the lemma, flemma, and Bauer and Nation's (1993) level-6 word family (WF6). When WF6 is used, it is assumed that if one family member is known, unfamiliar members can be understood when encountered in meaningful contexts. Past investigations of this assumption have been criticized for assessing knowledge of morphologically-related words only in isolation or in sentence-length contexts. The present study addressed this concern by examining Japanese university students' ability to understand related words in isolation, in limited-context sentences, and in page-length passages. The relationship between baseword and derivational form knowledge was weak, and the level of contextualization had little effect on this relationship. These findings corroborate past findings and support the use of limited-context assessment in research on the word family and the relationship between vocabulary and reading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors impeding implementing CALL-based instruction: A mixed-methods study 阻碍实施基于 CALL 的教学的因素:混合方法研究
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103461
Saieed Moslemi Nezhad Arani , Abbas Ali Zarei , Abdullah Sarani

As an innovative approach to language pedagogy, Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) research has been gaining traction in recent decades. However, the novel incorporation of technology in the classroom context presents some unique challenges unprecedented in conventional language learning contexts. The present study is an attempt at identifying the factors prohibiting the successful implementation of CALL, with particular attention on the context of Iran. To this end, an exploratory mixed-methods sequential design was adopted. Fifteen Iranian EFL instructors were interviewed and the data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Built upon the findings of the interviews, a questionnaire was developed to assess the generalizability of the interview findings. The 33-item questionnaire was developed and distributed online among 200 EFL teachers. It was revealed that certain factors, including EFL teachers and learners' knowledge of computers, cultural and religious background, institutional support policy, and human factors such as learners' learning style and age could hinder the successful incorporation of CALL in language learning contexts. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed the generalizability of the identified prohibitive factors. The findings are discussed under the light of Rogers’ (2003)Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DIT) to further contextualize the implications of the study for macro- and micro-level policymakers, curriculum developers, and language teachers.

作为语言教学法的一种创新方法,计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)研究在近几十年来日益受到重视。然而,在课堂教学中融入新技术带来了一些在传统语言学习环境中前所未有的独特挑战。本研究试图找出阻碍 CALL 成功实施的因素,并特别关注伊朗的情况。为此,本研究采用了探索性混合方法序列设计。对 15 名伊朗 EFL 教师进行了访谈,并通过主题分析法对数据进行了分析。在访谈结果的基础上,编制了一份调查问卷,以评估访谈结果的可推广性。我们编制了 33 个项目的调查问卷,并在网上向 200 名 EFL 教师发放。结果显示,某些因素(包括 EFL 教师和学习者对计算机的了解程度、文化和宗教背景、机构支持政策以及学习者的学习风格和年龄等人为因素)可能会阻碍 CALL 在语言学习环境中的成功应用。主成分分析(PCA)证实了所发现的阻碍因素的普遍性。研究结果将根据罗杰斯(2003)的创新扩散理论(DIT)进行讨论,以进一步阐明本研究对宏观和微观层面的政策制定者、课程开发者和语言教师的影响。
{"title":"Factors impeding implementing CALL-based instruction: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Saieed Moslemi Nezhad Arani ,&nbsp;Abbas Ali Zarei ,&nbsp;Abdullah Sarani","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103461","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103461","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As an innovative approach to language pedagogy, Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) research has been gaining traction in recent decades. However, the novel incorporation of technology in the classroom context presents some unique challenges unprecedented in conventional language learning contexts. The present study is an attempt at identifying the factors prohibiting the successful implementation of CALL, with particular attention on the context of Iran. To this end, an exploratory mixed-methods sequential design was adopted. Fifteen Iranian EFL instructors were interviewed and the data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Built upon the findings of the interviews, a questionnaire was developed to assess the generalizability of the interview findings. The 33-item questionnaire was developed and distributed online among 200 EFL teachers. It was revealed that certain factors, including EFL teachers and learners' knowledge of computers, cultural and religious background, institutional support policy, and human factors such as learners' learning style and age could hinder the successful incorporation of CALL in language learning contexts. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed the generalizability of the identified prohibitive factors. The findings are discussed under the light of Rogers’ (2003)Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DIT) to further contextualize the implications of the study for macro- and micro-level policymakers, curriculum developers, and language teachers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Designing a task-based conversational agent for EFL in German schools: Student needs, actions, and perceptions 为德国学校的英语语言教学设计基于任务的会话代理:学生的需求、行动和看法
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103460
Elizabeth Bear , Xiaobin Chen , Daniela Verratti Souto , Luisa Ribeiro-Flucht , Björn Rudzewitz , Detmar Meurers

As part of an iterative evaluation process incorporating student stakeholders within a task-based language teaching (TBLT) framework, we examine the design and early learner data of a conversational agent for English as a foreign language (EFL) in the German school context. Students (around age 12 and at an A2 proficiency level) from three 7th grade classes interacted with five tasks and completed a questionnaire assessing their needs and perceptions. Results of the needs analysis revealed that most students speak some English outside of class and that they wish for tasks targeting both authentic and curricular needs. The interaction logs showed a strong preference for typing over speaking and moderate automatic speech recognition (ASR) accuracy for the spoken interactions. Differing rates of task success and interest between the five tasks confirmed the importance of task characteristics. Despite some noted limitations, student perceptions were largely positive, with the tasks appearing more fun and more challenging for students who speak less English outside of class. Overall, our findings highlight the promise and challenges of designing a task-based conversational agent for the school EFL classroom, offering insights into balancing pedagogical and technological design, the demands of official curricula, and students’ authentic needs.

作为在任务型语言教学(TBLT)框架内将学生利益相关者纳入迭代评估过程的一部分,我们研究了德国学校英语作为外语(EFL)的会话代理的设计和早期学习者数据。来自三个七年级班级的学生(12 岁左右,水平在 A2 级左右)与五个任务进行了互动,并填写了一份问卷,对他们的需求和看法进行了评估。需求分析结果显示,大多数学生在课外会说一些英语,他们希望任务既能满足真实需求,又能满足课程需求。互动日志显示,打字比口语更受欢迎,口语互动的自动语音识别(ASR)准确率适中。五项任务之间不同的任务成功率和兴趣证实了任务特征的重要性。尽管存在一些明显的局限性,但学生的看法基本上是积极的,对于课外英语水平较低的学生来说,这些任务似乎更有趣、更具挑战性。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了为学校 EFL 课堂设计基于任务的会话代理的前景和挑战,为平衡教学和技术设计、官方课程要求和学生的真实需求提供了启示。
{"title":"Designing a task-based conversational agent for EFL in German schools: Student needs, actions, and perceptions","authors":"Elizabeth Bear ,&nbsp;Xiaobin Chen ,&nbsp;Daniela Verratti Souto ,&nbsp;Luisa Ribeiro-Flucht ,&nbsp;Björn Rudzewitz ,&nbsp;Detmar Meurers","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103460","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103460","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As part of an iterative evaluation process incorporating student stakeholders within a task-based language teaching (TBLT) framework, we examine the design and early learner data of a conversational agent for English as a foreign language (EFL) in the German school context. Students (around age 12 and at an A2 proficiency level) from three 7th grade classes interacted with five tasks and completed a questionnaire assessing their needs and perceptions. Results of the needs analysis revealed that most students speak some English outside of class and that they wish for tasks targeting both authentic and curricular needs. The interaction logs showed a strong preference for typing over speaking and moderate automatic speech recognition (ASR) accuracy for the spoken interactions. Differing rates of task success and interest between the five tasks confirmed the importance of task characteristics. Despite some noted limitations, student perceptions were largely positive, with the tasks appearing more fun and more challenging for students who speak less English outside of class. Overall, our findings highlight the promise and challenges of designing a task-based conversational agent for the school EFL classroom, offering insights into balancing pedagogical and technological design, the demands of official curricula, and students’ authentic needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002422/pdfft?md5=bce9cb96eea1de7d1ea663e106fc9fb5&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002422-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The longitudinal development of argumentative writing in an English for academic purposes course in Japan 日本学术英语课程中议论文写作的纵向发展
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103482
Daniel O. Jackson

Recent advances in second language (L2) writing pedagogy have placed argumentative writing at the center of the agenda for classroom instruction and research owing to its perceived advantages for developing learners' language, reasoning, and thinking skills. Along with this trend, the assessment of argumentative writing in terms of both structure (i.e., formal elements) and substance (i.e., argument quality) presents challenges and opportunities. In addition, relatively few studies have looked closely at the longitudinal development of argumentation in L2 writing and their range of geographic contexts is limited. Therefore, this classroom study aimed to track the development of students’ argumentative writing over one year of instruction in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course at a Japanese university. Samples of argumentative writing were collected from eighteen student writers using a counterbalanced, pretest, posttest, delayed posttest design. These were scored using an analytic rubric that integrates Toulmin-like elements and argument quality. A significant gain was found between the pretest and delayed posttest, which amounted to a 20% score increase. However, progress was also found to vary according to argumentative elements. This development is discussed in terms of teaching practices adopted in the EAP course, including the pedagogical implications of using the Toulmin model in L2 argumentative writing instruction. Limitations including measurement reliability are also considered.

第二语言(L2)写作教学法的最新进展将议论文写作置于课堂教学和研究议程的中心,因为议论文写作在培养学习者的语言、推理和思维能力方面具有明显的优势。伴随着这一趋势,从结构(即形式要素)和内容(即论证质量)两方面对议论文写作进行评估,既是挑战也是机遇。此外,密切关注论证在 L2 写作中的纵向发展的研究相对较少,而且研究的地理背景范围有限。因此,本课堂研究旨在跟踪日本一所大学学术英语(EAP)课程一年来学生议论文写作的发展情况。研究采用平衡、前测、后测、延迟后测的设计,从 18 名学生写作者中收集了论证性写作样本。这些样本采用分析评分标准进行评分,该评分标准综合了图尔敏式要素和论证质量。结果发现,在前测和延迟后测之间取得了明显的进步,分数提高了 20%。然而,根据论证要素的不同,学生的进步也有所不同。我们从 EAP 课程所采用的教学实践角度讨论了这一进展,包括在 L2 议论文写作教学中使用图尔敏模型的教学意义。此外,还考虑了包括测量可靠性在内的局限性。
{"title":"The longitudinal development of argumentative writing in an English for academic purposes course in Japan","authors":"Daniel O. Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103482","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103482","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent advances in second language (L2) writing pedagogy have placed argumentative writing at the center of the agenda for classroom instruction and research owing to its perceived advantages for developing learners' language, reasoning, and thinking skills. Along with this trend, the assessment of argumentative writing in terms of both structure (i.e., formal elements) and substance (i.e., argument quality) presents challenges and opportunities. In addition, relatively few studies have looked closely at the longitudinal development of argumentation in L2 writing and their range of geographic contexts is limited. Therefore, this classroom study aimed to track the development of students’ argumentative writing over one year of instruction in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course at a Japanese university. Samples of argumentative writing were collected from eighteen student writers using a counterbalanced, pretest, posttest, delayed posttest design. These were scored using an analytic rubric that integrates Toulmin-like elements and argument quality. A significant gain was found between the pretest and delayed posttest, which amounted to a 20% score increase. However, progress was also found to vary according to argumentative elements. This development is discussed in terms of teaching practices adopted in the EAP course, including the pedagogical implications of using the Toulmin model in L2 argumentative writing instruction. Limitations including measurement reliability are also considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142173854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From teacher-intended to learner-actualised affordances in a WeChat-Supported mobile Chinese language learning environment 微信支持的移动中文学习环境中从教师意图到学习者实现的可负担性
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103459
Peiru Tong , Irene Shidong An , Yijun Zhou

This paper draws on the ecological concept of affordance and learner agency to investigate Chinese language learners' actualised (perceived, used or shaped) affordances in a mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) environment. This study took place in a beginner-level Chinese course at a university in Australia. Potential learning affordances were designed and made available through WeChat-supported tasks to extend in-class learning. Qualitative student interviews, WeChat history, student survey and teacher reflective journals were the primary sources of data and thematic analysis was used for data analysis. The findings identified different levels of learner-actualised affordances (including perceived, used, and shaped affordances) and missed affordances (including those not perceived and those perceived but not used). Additionally, we investigated the distribution of these affordances within two functional types: cognitive and socio-affective affordances. Potential reasons for the missed affordances were explored. This study suggests that beginner-level learners of Chinese can leverage learner agency to understand the teachers' intended educational affordances. To facilitate this understanding, teachers are advised to offer scaffoldings to enhance the visibility of MALL affordances, particularly those related to interactions, multi-modal expressions, and authenticity. This affordance-oriented guidance has the potential to amplify learning opportunities for learners of the Chinese language engaged in MALL.

本文借鉴 "可负担性 "和 "学习者代理 "的生态学概念,研究中文学习者在移动辅助语言学习(MALL)环境中的实际(感知、使用或塑造)可负担性。这项研究是在澳大利亚一所大学的初级汉语课程中进行的。通过微信支持的任务,设计并提供了潜在的学习能力,以扩展课堂学习。定性学生访谈、微信历史记录、学生调查和教师反思日志是主要的数据来源,数据分析采用了主题分析法。研究结果确定了不同层次的学习者实际可承受性(包括感知到的、使用过的和形成的可承受性)和遗漏的可承受性(包括未感知到的和感知到但未使用过的)。此外,我们还调查了这些负担能力在两种功能类型中的分布情况:认知负担能力和社会情感负担能力。我们还探究了遗漏负担能力的潜在原因。本研究表明,初级汉语学习者可以利用学习者的能动性来理解教师预期的教育功能。为了促进这种理解,建议教师提供支架,以提高 MALL 能力的可见性,尤其是与互动、多模式表达和真实性相关的能力。这种以能力为导向的指导有可能为参与 MALL 的汉语学习者提供更多的学习机会。
{"title":"From teacher-intended to learner-actualised affordances in a WeChat-Supported mobile Chinese language learning environment","authors":"Peiru Tong ,&nbsp;Irene Shidong An ,&nbsp;Yijun Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103459","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103459","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper draws on the ecological concept of affordance and learner agency to investigate Chinese language learners' actualised (perceived, used or shaped) affordances in a mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) environment. This study took place in a beginner-level Chinese course at a university in Australia. Potential learning affordances were designed and made available through WeChat-supported tasks to extend in-class learning. Qualitative student interviews, WeChat history, student survey and teacher reflective journals were the primary sources of data and thematic analysis was used for data analysis. The findings identified different levels of learner-actualised affordances (including perceived, used, and shaped affordances) and missed affordances (including those not perceived and those perceived but not used). Additionally, we investigated the distribution of these affordances within two functional types: cognitive and socio-affective affordances. Potential reasons for the missed affordances were explored. This study suggests that beginner-level learners of Chinese can leverage learner agency to understand the teachers' intended educational affordances. To facilitate this understanding, teachers are advised to offer scaffoldings to enhance the visibility of MALL affordances, particularly those related to interactions, multi-modal expressions, and authenticity. This affordance-oriented guidance has the potential to amplify learning opportunities for learners of the Chinese language engaged in MALL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Teaching pragmatics to instructors of L2 Japanese: A relevance-theoretic approach 向第二语言日语教师教授语用学:相关性理论方法
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103472
Erika Marcet

There are few continuing professional development (CPD) courses for language instructors who want to incorporate the teaching of pragmatics, particularly outside second and foreign language (L2) English and Spanish (e.g., Cohen et al., 2023; Vellenga, 2011). Furthermore, most courses rarely include pragmatics theories that describe the cognitive processes involved in communication. To address this gap, this study assesses what pre-service and in-service instructors of L2 Japanese (n = 9) know about pragmatics and presents data from a 3-hCPD course. The CPD is based on Sperber & Wilson's (1986/1995) Relevance Theory, an ostensive-inferential pragmatics theory that explains the cognitive mechanisms used to interpret utterances. These cognitive processes and how to teach them are explained through a pedagogical framework that equips instructors with the pragmatic knowledge and tools needed to help their learners achieve effective communication.

A qualitative pre- and post-test was employed to ascertain instructors' knowledge of pragmatics and ability to activate their pragmatic competence. Focus groups with each cohort were conducted to gather insights into instructors' willingness and preparedness to teach pragmatics. The CPD increased both participants' understanding of pragmatics and knowledge of how to activate learners' pragmatic competence. The data also reveals differences between pre-service and in-service teachers, as well as native and non-native speakers’ willingness to include pragmatics in their teaching.

对于希望将语用学教学(尤其是第二语言和外语(L2)英语和西班牙语以外的语用学教学)纳入教学的语言教师而言,很少有持续专业发展(CPD)课程(例如,Cohen 等人,2023 年;Vellenga,2011 年)。此外,大多数课程很少包含描述交际认知过程的语用学理论。为了弥补这一不足,本研究评估了日语第二语言的职前和在职教师(n = 9)对语用学的了解程度,并提供了 3 小时 CPD 课程的数据。CPD 以 Sperber & Wilson(1986/1995)的 "相关性理论"(Relevance Theory)为基础。通过一个教学框架来解释这些认知过程以及如何教授这些认知过程,该框架为教师提供了语用知识和工具,以帮助他们的学习者实现有效的交流。与每个学员进行了焦点小组讨论,以深入了解教员教授语用学的意愿和准备情况。持续专业发展课程提高了参与者对语用学的理解,以及对如何激活学习者语用能力的认识。数据还显示了职前和在职教师之间的差异,以及母语和非母语教师将语用学纳入教学的意愿。
{"title":"Teaching pragmatics to instructors of L2 Japanese: A relevance-theoretic approach","authors":"Erika Marcet","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103472","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103472","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are few continuing professional development (CPD) courses for language instructors who want to incorporate the teaching of pragmatics, particularly outside second and foreign language (L2) English and Spanish (e.g., Cohen et al., 2023; Vellenga, 2011). Furthermore, most courses rarely include pragmatics theories that describe the cognitive processes involved in communication. To address this gap, this study assesses what pre-service and in-service instructors of L2 Japanese (n = 9) know about pragmatics and presents data from a 3-hCPD course. The CPD is based on Sperber &amp; Wilson's (1986/1995) Relevance Theory, an ostensive-inferential pragmatics theory that explains the cognitive mechanisms used to interpret utterances. These cognitive processes and how to teach them are explained through a pedagogical framework that equips instructors with the pragmatic knowledge and tools needed to help their learners achieve effective communication.</p><p>A qualitative pre- and post-test was employed to ascertain instructors' knowledge of pragmatics and ability to activate their pragmatic competence. Focus groups with each cohort were conducted to gather insights into instructors' willingness and preparedness to teach pragmatics. The CPD increased both participants' understanding of pragmatics and knowledge of how to activate learners' pragmatic competence. The data also reveals differences between pre-service and in-service teachers, as well as native and non-native speakers’ willingness to include pragmatics in their teaching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002549/pdfft?md5=c613a337706533e76eb97b1cf6c45d08&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002549-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of research on emotional artificial intelligence in English language education 对英语语言教育中情感人工智能研究的系统回顾
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103478
Yuhan Liu , Heng Zhang , Meilin Jiang , Juanjuan Chen , Minhong Wang

In learning English as a foreign language (EFL), students often experience foreign language anxiety. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications that provide emotional support and/or create emotional impacts on student learning, so-called emotional AI applications, have received increased attention. However, there is a lack of a systematic review of studies on emotional AI in EFL education. This paper presents a systematic review of research in this field. The results reveal five affordances of emotional AI in EFL education, namely (1) enabling human-like conversations, (2) providing personalized real-time feedback or instructions, (3) translating images into English text, (4) generating personalized learning content and tasks, and (5) recognizing and analyzing emotions. The first three affordances are more frequently used and have shown promising effects on improving students’ behavioral, cognitive, and affective learning outcomes. Moreover, the findings reveal that emotional support is often integrated with cognitive support; providing emotional support alone may not be enough to support student learning. Meanwhile, providing cognitive support alone can enhance both affective and cognitive learning outcomes. Finally, attention should be paid to the factors that might influence the adoption and effects of emotional AI in EFL education.

在英语作为外语(EFL)的学习过程中,学生经常会出现外语焦虑。提供情感支持和/或对学生学习产生情感影响的人工智能(AI)应用,即所谓的情感 AI 应用,受到越来越多的关注。然而,目前还缺乏对 EFL 教育中情感人工智能研究的系统综述。本文对这一领域的研究进行了系统回顾。研究结果揭示了情感人工智能在 EFL 教育中的五种功能,即(1)实现类人对话;(2)提供个性化的实时反馈或指导;(3)将图像翻译成英文文本;(4)生成个性化的学习内容和任务;(5)识别和分析情感。前三种能力使用频率较高,在改善学生的行为、认知和情感学习成果方面显示出良好的效果。此外,研究结果表明,情感支持往往与认知支持相结合;仅仅提供情感支持可能不足以支持学生的学习。同时,单独提供认知支持可以同时提高情感和认知学习成果。最后,应关注可能影响情感人工智能在 EFL 教育中的应用和效果的因素。
{"title":"A systematic review of research on emotional artificial intelligence in English language education","authors":"Yuhan Liu ,&nbsp;Heng Zhang ,&nbsp;Meilin Jiang ,&nbsp;Juanjuan Chen ,&nbsp;Minhong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103478","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103478","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In learning English as a foreign language (EFL), students often experience foreign language anxiety. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications that provide emotional support and/or create emotional impacts on student learning, so-called emotional AI applications, have received increased attention. However, there is a lack of a systematic review of studies on emotional AI in EFL education. This paper presents a systematic review of research in this field. The results reveal five affordances of emotional AI in EFL education, namely (1) enabling human-like conversations, (2) providing personalized real-time feedback or instructions, (3) translating images into English text, (4) generating personalized learning content and tasks, and (5) recognizing and analyzing emotions. The first three affordances are more frequently used and have shown promising effects on improving students’ behavioral, cognitive, and affective learning outcomes. Moreover, the findings reveal that emotional support is often integrated with cognitive support; providing emotional support alone may not be enough to support student learning. Meanwhile, providing cognitive support alone can enhance both affective and cognitive learning outcomes. Finally, attention should be paid to the factors that might influence the adoption and effects of emotional AI in EFL education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002604/pdfft?md5=e18a712400c64f718e5d1c7c3ebbdccd&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002604-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142163138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring EFL teachers’ emotional experiences and adaptive expertise in the context of AI advancements: A positive psychology perspective 探索人工智能进步背景下 EFL 教师的情感体验和适应性专业知识:积极心理学视角
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103463
Yanhong Liu , Pengyun Chang

The rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are reshaping language education, raising concerns about the professional future of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers. While existing literature often highlights the effectiveness of AI tools, it tends to overlook their impact on teachers' relevant expertise development and emotional experiences. This longitudinal study addresses this gap by exploring EFL teachers' emotional landscapes and adaptive expertise development through the lens of positive psychology. Employing thematic analysis, the study draws on data from three rounds of semi-structured interviews with ten EFL teachers, complemented by students' post-class reflections and classroom observations. The findings highlight the pivotal role of positive emotions in EFL teachers' professional development, revealing a dynamic, non-linear interaction between positive and negative emotions as teachers navigate AI-integrated language education. This emotional interplay is significantly influenced by teachers' social connections and professional backgrounds. The study underscores the need for institutional support systems that promote positive emotions and enhance teachers' digital literacy. By deepening our understanding of EFL teachers’ emotional experiences and professional growth within the AI-integrated educational context, this study offers valuable insights for designing targeted interventions and curriculum reforms that foster effective collaboration between human and AI intelligence in global education.

人工智能(AI)的快速发展正在重塑语言教育,引发了人们对英语作为外语(EFL)教师职业未来的担忧。虽然现有文献经常强调人工智能工具的有效性,但往往忽视了它们对教师相关专业知识发展和情感体验的影响。本纵向研究通过积极心理学的视角探索 EFL 教师的情感景观和适应性专业知识发展,弥补了这一空白。本研究采用主题分析法,通过对十位英语教师进行三轮半结构式访谈,并辅之以学生的课后反思和课堂观察。研究结果强调了积极情绪在 EFL 教师专业发展中的关键作用,揭示了教师在引导人工智能整合语言教育过程中积极情绪和消极情绪之间的动态、非线性互动。教师的社会关系和专业背景对这种情绪互动产生了重大影响。这项研究强调,有必要建立促进积极情绪和提高教师数字素养的机构支持系统。通过加深对人工智能整合教育背景下 EFL 教师的情感体验和专业成长的理解,本研究为设计有针对性的干预措施和课程改革提供了宝贵的见解,从而促进全球教育中人类与人工智能之间的有效合作。
{"title":"Exploring EFL teachers’ emotional experiences and adaptive expertise in the context of AI advancements: A positive psychology perspective","authors":"Yanhong Liu ,&nbsp;Pengyun Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103463","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103463","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are reshaping language education, raising concerns about the professional future of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers. While existing literature often highlights the effectiveness of AI tools, it tends to overlook their impact on teachers' relevant expertise development and emotional experiences. This longitudinal study addresses this gap by exploring EFL teachers' emotional landscapes and adaptive expertise development through the lens of positive psychology. Employing thematic analysis, the study draws on data from three rounds of semi-structured interviews with ten EFL teachers, complemented by students' post-class reflections and classroom observations. The findings highlight the pivotal role of positive emotions in EFL teachers' professional development, revealing a dynamic, non-linear interaction between positive and negative emotions as teachers navigate AI-integrated language education. This emotional interplay is significantly influenced by teachers' social connections and professional backgrounds. The study underscores the need for institutional support systems that promote positive emotions and enhance teachers' digital literacy. By deepening our understanding of EFL teachers’ emotional experiences and professional growth within the AI-integrated educational context, this study offers valuable insights for designing targeted interventions and curriculum reforms that foster effective collaboration between human and AI intelligence in global education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142158159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of foreign language proficiency: Emotion regulation, foreign language enjoyment, or academic stress? 外语水平的预测因素:情绪调节、外语乐趣还是学习压力?
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103462
Nada A. Alqarni

Despite recent interest in language learners' psychology, a noticeable gap remains in understanding the effects of a range of psychological factors, such as emotion-regulation (ER) strategies (i.e. cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression), foreign-language enjoyment (FLE), and perceived academic stress (PAS) on foreign-language learners’ proficiency. To address this gap, this study collected quantitative data from 215 undergraduate Saudi students studying English as a foreign language (EFL). A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach was used to construct and test a hypothesised structural model of the direct and indirect effects of ER, FLE, and PAS on EFL proficiency. The findings indicate that FLE and PAS positively predict high EFL proficiency. ER strategies do not directly influence EFL proficiency, but do so indirectly through FLE and PAS. The findings also reveal that the adoption of cognitive reappraisal predicts high levels of FLE and PAS, whereas the adoption of expressive suppression predicts lower PAS without reducing FLE. The findings indicate a complex and evolving relationship between the positive and negative emotions of language learners, which can influence their progress in language learning both directly and indirectly.

尽管近年来人们对语言学习者的心理学产生了浓厚的兴趣,但在了解一系列心理因素,如情绪调节(ER)策略(即认知再评价和表达抑制)、外语乐趣(FLE)和感知学业压力(PAS)对外语学习者水平的影响方面,仍然存在着明显的差距。为了填补这一空白,本研究收集了 215 名学习外语(EFL)的沙特本科生的定量数据。研究采用偏最小二乘结构方程建模法,构建并检验了 ER、FLE 和 PAS 对 EFL 能力的直接和间接影响的假设结构模型。研究结果表明,FLE 和 PAS 可积极预测 EFL 的高水平。ER 策略并不直接影响 EFL 水平,而是通过 FLE 和 PAS 间接影响 EFL 水平。研究结果还显示,采用认知再评价策略可预测高水平的 FLE 和 PAS,而采用表达抑制策略可预测较低的 PAS,但不会降低 FLE。研究结果表明,语言学习者的积极情绪和消极情绪之间存在着复杂而不断变化的关系,这种关系会直接或间接地影响他们的语言学习进度。
{"title":"Predictors of foreign language proficiency: Emotion regulation, foreign language enjoyment, or academic stress?","authors":"Nada A. Alqarni","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103462","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103462","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite recent interest in language learners' psychology, a noticeable gap remains in understanding the effects of a range of psychological factors, such as emotion-regulation (ER) strategies (i.e. cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression), foreign-language enjoyment (FLE), and perceived academic stress (PAS) on foreign-language learners’ proficiency. To address this gap, this study collected quantitative data from 215 undergraduate Saudi students studying English as a foreign language (EFL). A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach was used to construct and test a hypothesised structural model of the direct and indirect effects of ER, FLE, and PAS on EFL proficiency. The findings indicate that FLE and PAS positively predict high EFL proficiency. ER strategies do not directly influence EFL proficiency, but do so indirectly through FLE and PAS. The findings also reveal that the adoption of cognitive reappraisal predicts high levels of FLE and PAS, whereas the adoption of expressive suppression predicts lower PAS without reducing FLE. The findings indicate a complex and evolving relationship between the positive and negative emotions of language learners, which can influence their progress in language learning both directly and indirectly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142148561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symphony with noises and keynotes: Effective feedback process in L2 postgraduate academic writing from a teacher feedback literacy perspective 嘈杂与基调的交响乐:从教师反馈素养的角度看研究生学术写作中的有效反馈过程
IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103464
Linlin Xu , Jiehui Hu , Yang Su , Xuemei Chen

While teacher feedback literacy has garnered increasing scholarly interest, much discussion has centred on teachers’ perspectives, overlooking students’ insights into teacher feedback literacy in enhancing their learning (and writing). To address this issue, this study draws on the effective feedback process recognised by the teacher and students within the same L2 postgraduate academic writing class, exploring the key teacher competencies that compose and contextualise teacher feedback literacy. The analysis of individual interviews with the teacher and nine students, 150 students’ self-reflections and classroom observations informs the development of a two-dimension framework with six key competencies contributing to teacher feedback literacy. The first is autonomous dimension, which includes three teacher competencies characterised by ‘collaboration’, ‘reflection’ and ‘refinement’, emphasising teachers’ self-governance, continuous improvement and proactivity in designing and enacting feedback practices. The second is facilitative dimension, which encompasses such competencies as facilitating a ‘synergy’, ‘student reflective and critical engagement’ and ‘long-term effects’ of feedback practices, highlighting teachers’ capacity of enabling and guiding the students, and making the feedback process more engaging. The two-dimension framework of teacher competencies suggests a longitudinal perspective of constructing a student-led feedback process that fosters synergic collaborations among human agents and their interactions with feedback resources and artefacts.

尽管教师反馈素养引起了越来越多学者的关注,但许多讨论都集中在教师的视角上,而忽略了学生对教师反馈素养在促进其学习(和写作)方面的见解。为解决这一问题,本研究以同一门研究生学术写作(L2)课上教师和学生认可的有效反馈过程为基础,探讨了构成教师反馈素养的关键教师能力。通过对教师和 9 名学生的个别访谈、150 名学生的自我反思以及课堂观察的分析,我们建立了一个双维框架,其中包含有助于提高教师反馈素养的六种关键能力。第一个维度是自主维度,包括 "合作"、"反思 "和 "改进 "三种教师能力,强调教师在设计和实施反馈实践中的自我管理、持续改进和积极主动。第二个维度是促进维度,包括促进反馈实践的 "协同作用"、"学生反思和批判性参与 "以及 "长期效果 "等能力,强调教师对学生的促进和引导能力,使反馈过程更具吸引力。教师能力的两个维度框架建议从纵向角度构建以学生为主导的反馈过程,促进人与人之间的协同合作以及他们与反馈资源和人工制品之间的互动。
{"title":"Symphony with noises and keynotes: Effective feedback process in L2 postgraduate academic writing from a teacher feedback literacy perspective","authors":"Linlin Xu ,&nbsp;Jiehui Hu ,&nbsp;Yang Su ,&nbsp;Xuemei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103464","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103464","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While teacher feedback literacy has garnered increasing scholarly interest, much discussion has centred on teachers’ perspectives, overlooking students’ insights into teacher feedback literacy in enhancing their learning (and writing). To address this issue, this study draws on the effective feedback process recognised by the teacher and students within the same L2 postgraduate academic writing class, exploring the key teacher competencies that compose and contextualise teacher feedback literacy. The analysis of individual interviews with the teacher and nine students, 150 students’ self-reflections and classroom observations informs the development of a two-dimension framework with six key competencies contributing to teacher feedback literacy. The first is autonomous dimension, which includes three teacher competencies characterised by ‘collaboration’, ‘reflection’ and ‘refinement’, emphasising teachers’ self-governance, continuous improvement and proactivity in designing and enacting feedback practices. The second is facilitative dimension, which encompasses such competencies as facilitating a ‘synergy’, ‘student reflective and critical engagement’ and ‘long-term effects’ of feedback practices, highlighting teachers’ capacity of enabling and guiding the students, and making the feedback process more engaging. The two-dimension framework of teacher competencies suggests a longitudinal perspective of constructing a student-led feedback process that fosters synergic collaborations among human agents and their interactions with feedback resources and artefacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142148599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
System
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1