Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.12.004
Johannes Boegershausen , Yann Cornil , Shangwen Yi , David J. Hardisty
Marketing research has increasingly relied on online platform studies, which are studies conducted in a naturalistic online environment and which leverage the A/B testing tool provided by platforms such as Facebook or Google Ads. These studies allow researchers to compare the effectiveness of different ads and the way they are delivered, and to study “real” consumer behavior, such as clicking on ads. However, they lack true random assignment of ads to consumers, preventing causal inference. In this manuscript, we present a comprehensive review of 133 published online platform studies revealing how researchers have, so far, utilized and characterized these studies; we find that most of these studies are mistakenly presented as (randomized) experiments and most of their findings are erroneously described as causal. Our review suggests limited awareness of the inherent confoundedness of online platform studies (i.e., the inability to attribute user responses to ad creatives versus the platform’s targeting algorithms). Importantly, the prevalence of these undesirable practices has remained relatively constant over time. Against this backdrop, we offer clear guidance on how to position, conduct, and report online platform studies for researchers interested in this method and for reviewers invited to evaluate it.
{"title":"On the persistent mischaracterization of Google and Facebook A/B tests: How to conduct and report online platform studies","authors":"Johannes Boegershausen , Yann Cornil , Shangwen Yi , David J. Hardisty","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marketing research has increasingly relied on <em>online platform studies</em>, which are studies conducted in a naturalistic online environment and which leverage the A/B testing tool provided by platforms such as Facebook or Google Ads. These studies allow researchers to compare the effectiveness of different ads and the way they are delivered, and to study “real” consumer behavior, such as clicking on ads. However, they lack true random assignment of ads to consumers, preventing causal inference. In this manuscript, we present a comprehensive review of 133 published online platform studies revealing how researchers have, so far, utilized and characterized these studies; we find that most of these studies are mistakenly presented as (randomized) experiments and most of their findings are erroneously described as causal. Our review suggests limited awareness of the inherent confoundedness of online platform studies (i.e., the inability to attribute user responses to ad creatives versus the platform’s targeting algorithms). Importantly, the prevalence of these undesirable practices has remained relatively constant over time. Against this backdrop, we offer clear guidance on how to position, conduct, and report online platform studies for researchers interested in this method and for reviewers invited to evaluate it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 886-903"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145049863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.11.004
Laura De Kerpel , Anneleen Van Kerckhove , Tina Tessitore
Many companies are reluctant to apologize to their customers for trivial mistakes, which often go unnoticed and may seem too minor to warrant an apology. However, some companies have adopted the practice of apologizing for trivial mistakes via email to a large portion of their customer base, regardless of whether customers were directly affected by the mistake or not. This study explores whether acknowledging, and apologizing for, such trivial mistakes can be an effective persuasion tactic in direct email marketing. First, a field experiment that relies on real-life data demonstrates the beneficial impact of apologizing for trivial mistakes. Three (lab and online) experiments show that (1) apologizing for trivial mistakes positively affects customer evaluations of the company; (2) an increase in the company’s perceived warmth explains this impact, while a concomitant decrease in perceived competence is absent; and (3) the positive effect disappears when the apology stems from a company that is already perceived as high in warmth. Finally, the study concludes with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications, acknowledging certain limitations and avenues for future research.
{"title":"Oops! Sorry, my bad: How apologizing for trivial mistakes in direct email campaigns leads to positive customer evaluations","authors":"Laura De Kerpel , Anneleen Van Kerckhove , Tina Tessitore","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many companies are reluctant to apologize to their customers for <em>trivial</em> mistakes, which often go unnoticed and may seem too minor to warrant an apology. However, some companies have adopted the practice of apologizing for trivial mistakes via email to a large portion of their customer base, regardless of whether customers were directly affected by the mistake or not. This study explores whether acknowledging, and apologizing for, such trivial mistakes can be an effective persuasion tactic in direct email marketing. First, a field experiment that relies on real-life data demonstrates the beneficial impact of apologizing for trivial mistakes. Three (lab and online) experiments show that (1) apologizing for trivial mistakes positively affects customer evaluations of the company; (2) an increase in the company’s perceived warmth explains this impact, while a concomitant decrease in perceived competence is absent; and (3) the positive effect disappears when the apology stems from a company that is already perceived as high in warmth. Finally, the study concludes with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications, acknowledging certain limitations and avenues for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 752-767"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145050457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.06.003
Sophie M. Berghueser, Martin Spann
Marketers across industries appeal to consumers’ need for uniqueness in their marketing and product strategies. While there is an understanding of the many benefits of such a strategy and its underlying mechanisms, the effects are often linked to product scarcity, leaving a product’s distinctiveness compared to similar products unexplored. In this study, we examine the effect of product attribute distinctiveness using transaction data of a large non-fungible token (NFT) collection. Despite identical initial launch prices for all products in the collection, secondary sale prices vary substantially. Using a selection model, our results show that a unique product is less likely to be resold. We also find a positive relationship between attribute distinctiveness and transaction value. This indicates the importance of such product information to consumers. The implications of our empirical study add to the literature on uniqueness, NFTs, and crypto marketing.
{"title":"The value of distinctiveness: Product uniqueness in crypto marketing","authors":"Sophie M. Berghueser, Martin Spann","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marketers across industries appeal to consumers’ need for uniqueness in their marketing and product strategies. While there is an understanding of the many benefits of such a strategy and its underlying mechanisms, the effects are often linked to product scarcity, leaving a product’s distinctiveness compared to similar products unexplored. In this study, we examine the effect of product attribute distinctiveness using transaction data of a large non-fungible token (NFT) collection. Despite identical initial launch prices for all products in the collection, secondary sale prices vary substantially. Using a selection model, our results show that a unique product is less likely to be resold. We also find a positive relationship between attribute distinctiveness and transaction value. This indicates the importance of such product information to consumers. The implications of our empirical study add to the literature on uniqueness, NFTs, and crypto marketing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 573-593"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141690037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.06.003
Renana Peres , Martin Schreier , David A. Schweidel , Alina Sorescu
{"title":"Blockchain meets marketing: from concept to impactful research","authors":"Renana Peres , Martin Schreier , David A. Schweidel , Alina Sorescu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 487-490"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145057174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.01.003
Alok Kumar , Ravi Agarwal , Argha Sen , Amit Saini , Aric Rindfleisch
New products often emerge from alliances engaged in some degree of improvisation (convergence of planning and execution). However, since prior research has mainly focused upon improvisation within organizations, little is known about alliance-level improvisation or how it impacts new product development. Drawing on a broad set of literatures, we also propose that firms participating in alliances often align with partners that possess similar skills, lack a shared history, and place importance on external threats. We propose that these characteristics influence both the incidence and impact of improvisation within new product alliances. We test the effect of these three characteristics upon the incidence of improvisation in an initial study of 106 U.S. firms engaged in new product alliances. We then examine the degree to which these three characteristics moderate the impact of alliance improvisation upon new product performance via a follow-up study among 54 of these firms. We find that improvisation is more likely to occur when alliance partners lack relational experience but share similar skills. Furthermore, the impact of alliance improvisation on new product performance is enhanced when alliance partners possess similar skills, share relational experience, and place low importance on external threats. We then seek to replicate our findings in a third study involving 252 U.S. firms recently engaged in new product alliances, and also spotlight a few other drivers of alliance improvisation, including skill complementarity, shared governance, and cultural fit. We discuss the implications of our research for improvisation scholarship, provide managerial recommendations for enhancing improvisation practice, and offer a future research agenda for improvisation in new product alliances.
{"title":"Improvisation in new product alliances","authors":"Alok Kumar , Ravi Agarwal , Argha Sen , Amit Saini , Aric Rindfleisch","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>New products often emerge from alliances engaged in some degree of improvisation (convergence of planning and execution). However, since prior research has mainly focused upon improvisation within organizations, little is known about alliance-level improvisation or how it impacts new product development. Drawing on a broad set of literatures, we also propose that firms participating in alliances often align with partners that possess similar skills, lack a shared history, and place importance on external threats. We propose that these characteristics influence both the incidence and impact of improvisation within new product alliances. We test the effect of these three characteristics upon the incidence of improvisation in an initial study of 106 U.S. firms engaged in new product alliances. We then examine the degree to which these three characteristics moderate the impact of alliance improvisation upon new product performance via a follow-up study among 54 of these firms. We find that improvisation is more likely to occur when alliance partners lack relational experience but share similar skills. Furthermore, the impact of alliance improvisation on new product performance is enhanced when alliance partners possess similar skills, share relational experience, and place low importance on external threats. We then seek to replicate our findings in a third study involving 252 U.S. firms recently engaged in new product alliances, and also spotlight a few other drivers of alliance improvisation, including skill complementarity, shared governance, and cultural fit. We discuss the implications of our research for improvisation scholarship, provide managerial recommendations for enhancing improvisation practice, and offer a future research agenda for improvisation in new product alliances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 904-928"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145049862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.005
Rohit Varman , Michal Carrington , Andreas Chatzidakis , Deirdre Shaw
This research offers insights into the contradictions of how anti-slavery Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) deploy the frames of responsible buyer and responsible citizen to mobilize consumers against modern slavery. The study examines the underlying assumptions and contradictions of the frames by drawing on framing theory and Judith Butler’s approach to “framing the frames”. Such an approach helps understand how NGOs obfuscate the responsibility of corporations in contributing to modern slavery. This research adds to extant interpretation of consumer activism by pointing to how consumer mobilization can be more usefully explained as a contested terrain that is shaped by activist groups whose communication is characterized by contradictions and conflicts. It also broadens the scope of framing theory by foregrounding the ethics of communication frames.
{"title":"Frames of consumer mobilization and modern slavery","authors":"Rohit Varman , Michal Carrington , Andreas Chatzidakis , Deirdre Shaw","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research offers insights into the contradictions of how anti-slavery Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) deploy the frames of responsible buyer and responsible citizen to mobilize consumers against modern slavery. The study examines the underlying assumptions and contradictions of the frames by drawing on framing theory and Judith Butler’s approach to “framing the frames”. Such an approach helps understand how NGOs obfuscate the responsibility of corporations in contributing to modern slavery. This research adds to extant interpretation of consumer activism by pointing to how consumer mobilization can be more usefully explained as a contested terrain that is shaped by activist groups whose communication is characterized by contradictions and conflicts. It also broadens the scope of framing theory by foregrounding the ethics of communication frames.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 768-787"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145050458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.08.010
Martin Schoemann , Piet van de Mosselaar , Sonja Perkovic , Jacob L. Orquin
We propose that some products carry labels that mimic the features of certified health and sustainability labels and that such lookalike labels can confuse consumers into believing that a product has specific, desirable attributes. To address this, we develop a mouse-tracking method for measuring consumer confusion about product attributes. In Study 1, we show that lookalike labels often mislead consumers into believing a product includes a certified label, and that mouse cursor movements provide insights into confusion levels. By applying signal-detection theory to mouse cursor movements, we develop a novel metric that quantifies product attribute confusion and accurately flags products as either “attribute confusion suspect” or “attribute confusion safe”. In Study 2, we replicate our findings and show that attribute confusion is associated with a higher willingness-to-pay. In Study 3, we test the robustness of the metric under different exposure times. The novel attribute confusion metric provides marketers, policymakers, and consumer advocacy groups with a tool to design less confusing labels and can serve as evidence in cases where a product is suspected of misleading consumers or copycatting certified or trademarked labels.
{"title":"A method for measuring consumer confusion due to lookalike labels","authors":"Martin Schoemann , Piet van de Mosselaar , Sonja Perkovic , Jacob L. Orquin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.08.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose that some products carry labels that mimic the features of certified health and sustainability labels and that such lookalike labels can confuse consumers into believing that a product has specific, desirable attributes. To address this, we develop a mouse-tracking method for measuring consumer confusion about product attributes. In Study 1, we show that lookalike labels often mislead consumers into believing a product includes a certified label, and that mouse cursor movements provide insights into confusion levels. By applying signal-detection theory to mouse cursor movements, we develop a novel metric that quantifies product attribute confusion and accurately flags products as either “attribute confusion suspect” or “attribute confusion safe”. In Study 2, we replicate our findings and show that attribute confusion is associated with a higher willingness-to-pay. In Study 3, we test the robustness of the metric under different exposure times. The novel attribute confusion metric provides marketers, policymakers, and consumer advocacy groups with a tool to design less confusing labels and can serve as evidence in cases where a product is suspected of misleading consumers or copycatting certified or trademarked labels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages 298-315"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142257681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8116(25)00052-7
{"title":"Announcement: 2024 IJRM Best Articles","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0167-8116(25)00052-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0167-8116(25)00052-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages A3-A4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144223657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Human brands are an integral part of modern marketing and have proliferated in recent years, becoming one of the corner stones of the creator economy. There is a growing need to understand what specific strategies human brands, traditional ones and creators alike, can use to market and present themselves and the situational nuances of these strategies. While previous research has suggested that human brands should be generally presented in a positive light, this research shows that when human brands reveal their own weaknesses, it can lead to favorable consumer responses because of the heightened sense of authenticity. Moreover, the present research identifies three theoretically meaningful and practically relevant boundary conditions for the effect. Specifically, the effect is attenuated when the revelation is frequent and when the source of revelation is not the human brand itself, and reversed when the revealed weakness is severe. We use a mixed-method approach and provide converging support for our theorization across ten studies. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the weakness revelation effect in human brand marketing, and adds to the research on human brand authenticity. We further offer an explicit action plan to professional and self managers of human brands and outline the potential future research areas.
{"title":"Consumer responses to weakness revelation of human brands: The role of authenticity","authors":"Maggie Wenjing Liu , Junhui Huang , Qichao Zhu , Xiaolong Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human brands are an integral part of modern marketing and have proliferated in recent years, becoming one of the corner stones of the creator economy. There is a growing need to understand what specific strategies human brands, traditional ones and creators alike, can use to market and present themselves and the situational nuances of these strategies. While previous research has suggested that human brands should be generally presented in a positive light, this research shows that when human brands reveal their own weaknesses, it can lead to favorable consumer responses because of the heightened sense of authenticity. Moreover, the present research identifies three theoretically meaningful and practically relevant boundary conditions for the effect. Specifically, the effect is attenuated when the revelation is frequent and when the source of revelation is not the human brand itself, and reversed when the revealed weakness is severe. We use a mixed-method approach and provide converging support for our theorization across ten studies. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the weakness revelation effect in human brand marketing, and adds to the research on human brand authenticity. We further offer an explicit action plan to professional and self managers of human brands and outline the potential future research areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages 391-410"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144223687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.001
Peng Wang , Bikram Ghosh , Yong Liu
This paper examines an emerging pricing model, contingency selling, for markets where the product is sold in advance with attribute uncertainty and capacity constraint. A typical example is tournament ticket sales for sports events where it is uncertain whether a particular team will appear in the game. The model enables the firm to sell tickets in a contingent fashion, i.e., some tickets will be valid only if a certain team gets into the game. When consumers (fans) have sufficiently different preferences for different products (games with different teams), selling these “contingent tickets” better matches the price with the willingness-to-pay of particular consumer segments (fans of specific teams). Exploiting state-based price discrimination and belief heterogeneity, contingent tickets generate a higher margin per seat than the traditional way of selling general tickets, especially when there are supply constraints. We further show that contingency selling continues to be advantageous in the presence of secondary markets where consumers purchase tickets in advance but can trade tickets once they know which team will be in the game. We extend our model to examine the impacts of consumer optimism bias and fan base asymmetry. Finally, we compare contingency selling with alternative selling mechanisms to demonstrate the robustness of our results and illustrate the situations where this new selling model is more (or less) advantageous.
{"title":"Winning seats: Contingency selling in markets with limited capacity and diverse preferences","authors":"Peng Wang , Bikram Ghosh , Yong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines an emerging pricing model, contingency selling, for markets where the product is sold in advance with attribute uncertainty and capacity constraint. A typical example is tournament ticket sales for sports events where it is uncertain whether a particular team will appear in the game. The model enables the firm to sell tickets in a contingent fashion, i.e., some tickets will be valid only if a certain team gets into the game. When consumers (fans) have sufficiently different preferences for different products (games with different teams), selling these “contingent tickets” better matches the price with the willingness-to-pay of particular consumer segments (fans of specific teams). Exploiting <em>state-based</em> price discrimination and belief heterogeneity, contingent tickets generate a higher margin per seat than the traditional way of selling general tickets, especially when there are supply constraints. We further show that contingency selling continues to be advantageous in the presence of secondary markets where consumers purchase tickets in advance but can trade tickets once they know which team will be in the game. We extend our model to examine the impacts of consumer optimism bias and fan base asymmetry. Finally, we compare contingency selling with alternative selling mechanisms to demonstrate the robustness of our results and illustrate the situations where this new selling model is more (or less) advantageous.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages 433-449"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144223689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}