Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology最新文献

Objective: Regularly administering outcome measures, measurement-based care (MBC), informs clinical decision-making and improves youth mental health. Understanding predictors of high-fidelity MBC delivery helps ensure all youth can benefit from this evidence-based practice. Research on client and clinician predictors of MBC fidelity has mixed findings.

Method: Participants included 53 clinicians and 115 adolescents from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial with MBC only and MBC + Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UPA) conditions. Clients and clinicians reported demographic information. Clinicians completed broad- and narrow-band attitude measures. MBC fidelity was operationalized using the implementation index, combining rates of administering and viewing questionnaires, using objective MBC data.

Results and discussion: The average MBC fidelity was 56.75% (SD = 30.36) and was significantly higher in the MBC only condition (M = 67.46%, SD = 27.63%) than in MBC + UPA condition (M = 46.58%, SD = 29.52%; p = .012). Clients identifying as White received significantly higher MBC fidelity than youth not identifying as White. Youth ethnicity, family income, age, severity, and number of sessions did not significantly predict MBC fidelity. Clinicians with less experience at their agency, less confidence, and who found manualized treatments less appealing, had significantly higher MBC fidelity than other clinicians. These results can inform future efforts to increase fidelity and equity in MBC delivery.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate age group, gender, and baseline depressive symptom severity as possible effect moderators in (1) cognitive versus behavioral based CBT-modules and (2) sequences of modules that started either with cognitive or behavioral modules in indicated depression prevention in adolescents.

Method: We conducted a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial under four parallel conditions. Each condition consisted of four CBT-modules of three sessions (cognitive restructuring, problem solving, behavioral activation, relaxation), but the sequencing of modules differed. The CBT-modules and sequences were clustered into more cognitive versus more behavioral based approaches. The sample involved 282 Dutch adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms (Mage = 13.8; 55.7% girls, 92.9% Dutch). Assessments were conducted at baseline, after three sessions, at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up with self-reported depressive symptoms as the primary outcome.

Results: We found no evidence for substantial moderation effects. Age group, gender, and depressive symptom severity level at baseline did not moderate the effects of cognitive versus behavioral modules after three sessions. No evidence was also found that these characteristics moderated the effectiveness of sequences of modules that started either with cognitive or behavioral modules at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion: Cognitive and behavioral based modules and sequences in the prevention of depression in adolescents might apply to a relatively wide range of adolescents in terms of age group, gender, and severity levels of depressive symptoms.Abbreviation: CDI-2:F: Children's Depression Inventory-2 Full-length version; CDI-2:S: Children's Depression Inventory-2 Short version; STARr: Solve, Think, Act, Relax, and repeat.

Objective: To examine the associations between sociodemographic characteristics, perceived barriers to treatment, clinical impairment, and youth treatment engagement.

Method: Participants included 196 families (youth: ages 12 to 18; 64.3% cis-gender female; 23.5% Black, 60.7% White, and 12.2% Mixed/Other race; 41.3% Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity) recruited as part of a comparative effectiveness trial for adolescent anxiety and depression. Self-report measures of sociodemographic characteristics and caregiver perceived barriers were completed at intake. Youth clinical impairment was assessed at baseline via clinical interview. Measures of engagement were collected throughout treatment, including initiation status, session attendance, and termination status. Relationships were examined using analyses of variances and hierarchal linear and logistic modeling.

Results: Perceived barriers did not differ by sociodemographic characteristics. Greater perceived stressors and obstacles predicted fewer sessions attended and a lower likelihood of successful termination. Youth of caregivers with an advanced degree and those with caregivers who were employed part time attended more sessions and were more likely to initiate and terminate treatment successfully compared to youth with caregivers of a lower education level or student or unemployed status. At higher levels of youth clinical impairment, greater perceived treatment demands and issues predicted reduced likelihood of treatment initiation.

Conclusions: Perceived barriers, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical impairment were all associated with levels of engagement in the treatment process. Baseline and continued assessment of perceived and experienced barriers to treatment may promote individualized strategies for families identified as at-risk for reduced engagement.

Objective: This pilot study tested pragmatic methods for training therapists in core techniques of two evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for adolescent externalizing problems: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or family therapy (FT). Training methods were designed to help therapists accurately self-monitor their use of EBIs and increase delivery of EBIs with current clients. The study compared coder training only versus coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation.

Method: Therapists (N = 42) from seven behavioral health clinics reported on 65 youth clients; four clinics elected to train in CBT and three in FT. Therapists were randomized to either coder training only, consisting of a 25-week observational coder training course (didactic instruction and mock session coding exercises in core EBI techniques); or coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation, consisting of direct-to-therapist fidelity measurement feedback along with fidelity-focused expert consultation. During the 25 weeks of training, therapists submitted self-report data on EBI use along with companion session audiotapes subsequently coded by observational raters.

Results: Compared to coder training only, coder training plus fidelity-focused consultation produced superior effects in therapist ability to judge the extensiveness of EBI techniques in online coding sessions, as well as therapist ability to self-rate use of EBI techniques with their own cases. In both conditions, therapists who trained in CBT showed a significant, though modest, increase in real-world delivery of core CBT techniques; this did not occur for FT.

Conclusions: Pragmatic training and consultation methods show promise as viable and effective options for enhancing EBI fidelity monitoring and, for CBT, increasing EBI delivery.

Objective: Two lines of research, on outcome moderators and on novel treatment targets, seek to improve the overall efficacy of child anxiety treatment, with mixed results. We propose that an integration of both lines of research can lead to improved treatment efficacy. In a first proof of concept of this approach, we studied whether the interaction between baseline levels and targeted changes in peripheral oxytocin (OT) can predict differential responses to two childhood anxiety treatments.

Method: A total of 124 mother-child dyads participated in the study. Children's salivary OT levels were measured at baseline and again, immediately after an experimental dyadic interaction in the lab. Dyads were subsequently randomized to receive one of two treatments, differing in their targets: SPACE (Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions) and CBT (cognitive-behavioral therapy). Treatment outcomes were assessed using the Childhood Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders scale, reported by both mother and child.

Results: The findings suggest that in SPACE, where the mother is the main agent of change, higher baseline levels of child OT, coupled with increases in OT following a positive mother-child interaction, predicted greater treatment efficacy. By contrast, in CBT, where the child is the main agent of change, higher baseline levels of child OT, coupled with a decrease in OT following the interaction, predicted greater treatment efficacy.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of the integration between moderators and targets of treatments for progress toward improving treatment efficacy through precision medicine.