Background
Growth mindset helps students cope more effectively with academic setbacks, whereas different types of feedback play distinct roles in shaping students’ mindsets and, in turn, their responses to setbacks. However, previous work often used feedback to temporarily induce shifts in mindset without considering preexisting mindsets, and little is known about how these factors interact to shape motivation and behavior. Additionally, evidence on the effects of mixed feedback and different types of critical feedback remains limited.
Aims
We examine how mindsets and types of praise/critical feedback (person, process, or mixed feedback) influence students’ postfailure responses. Specifically, Studies 1a and 1b examined the effects of mindset and praise, whereas Studies 2a and 2b focused on mindset and critical feedback.
Sample
Study 1a: 115 university students; Study 1b: 168 high school students; Study 2a: 119 university students; and Study 2b: 172 high school students.
Methods
Students with different mindsets were randomly assigned to receive one type of praise/critical feedback. Postfailure responses were assessed after they received an artificial academic setback.
Results
Across studies, students with a growth mindset consistently demonstrated more adaptive responses to setbacks, regardless of the type of praise or critical feedback they received. Interestingly, we found that mixed praise feedback outperformed pure person or process praise feedback in terms of promoting persistence on a task among university students, but this was true only for students with higher growth mindset scores.
Conclusions
These findings underscore the value of fostering growth mindsets and suggest feedback should be tailored to existing mindsets.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
