Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.504
Jennifer Sink McCloud
In this critical meta-authoethnography, the author returns to the site of an ethnography she conducted five years before in a U.S. high school. JanCarlos, then a fifteen-year-old student, had taken up the position of interviewer and asked the author about her experience of the April 16, 2007, school shootings at Virginia Tech. His question—“Were you there when that kid killed all of those people?”—disrupted traumatic memories. Because JanCarlos had experienced increasing trouble and bullying in school, the author shamefully wondered about his motives in asking about the violent event. In a published book chapter, she writes about the difficulties of the April 16 conversation, including her discomfort at losing control of the interview, as well as her fear, ignorance, and stereotypes about school violence and bullying. In the end, the conversation had transformed her research, inviting her to seek to establish vulnerable presence with participants, experience emotion as instructive, embrace remembering as research, interrogate power with intersectional analysis, and acknowledge limitations to knowledge production. Five years later, she returns to re-engage in conversation with JanCarlos. She layers more understandings to her previous analysis of the April 16 conversation, as well as gains insight into JanCarlos’s difficult school year, bullying, and home/community experiences. The author delves into personal and methodological concerns, concluding with how a critical autoethnographic method is a humanizing way to be more transparent about knowledge production.
{"title":"Research Memories and Hauntings","authors":"Jennifer Sink McCloud","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.504","url":null,"abstract":"In this critical meta-authoethnography, the author returns to the site of an ethnography she conducted five years before in a U.S. high school. JanCarlos, then a fifteen-year-old student, had taken up the position of interviewer and asked the author about her experience of the April 16, 2007, school shootings at Virginia Tech. His question—“Were you there when that kid killed all of those people?”—disrupted traumatic memories. Because JanCarlos had experienced increasing trouble and bullying in school, the author shamefully wondered about his motives in asking about the violent event. In a published book chapter, she writes about the difficulties of the April 16 conversation, including her discomfort at losing control of the interview, as well as her fear, ignorance, and stereotypes about school violence and bullying. In the end, the conversation had transformed her research, inviting her to seek to establish vulnerable presence with participants, experience emotion as instructive, embrace remembering as research, interrogate power with intersectional analysis, and acknowledge limitations to knowledge production. Five years later, she returns to re-engage in conversation with JanCarlos. She layers more understandings to her previous analysis of the April 16 conversation, as well as gains insight into JanCarlos’s difficult school year, bullying, and home/community experiences. The author delves into personal and methodological concerns, concluding with how a critical autoethnographic method is a humanizing way to be more transparent about knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.456
Wesley D. Cohoon
Stigma is a powerful social construct that fluctuates, yet it can stay with a person for their entire life. When someone moves from a stigmatized to a socially acceptable position, it creates tension between their social and personal identity. This article examines how stigma is internalized and presented in different contexts. The author utilizes autoethnography to explore how his family, socioeconomic class, criminal history, vocation, and religion intersect and impact how he manages and presents stigma. The author finds that his transition from a stigmatized identity leaves him in a liminal space where he does not belong to the new or old group. The significance of the study is that it offers insight into how people process and present stigma, which is helpful for rehabilitation and recovery.
{"title":"Managing Identity When Worlds Collide","authors":"Wesley D. Cohoon","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.456","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.456","url":null,"abstract":"Stigma is a powerful social construct that fluctuates, yet it can stay with a person for their entire life. When someone moves from a stigmatized to a socially acceptable position, it creates tension between their social and personal identity. This article examines how stigma is internalized and presented in different contexts. The author utilizes autoethnography to explore how his family, socioeconomic class, criminal history, vocation, and religion intersect and impact how he manages and presents stigma. The author finds that his transition from a stigmatized identity leaves him in a liminal space where he does not belong to the new or old group. The significance of the study is that it offers insight into how people process and present stigma, which is helpful for rehabilitation and recovery.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545
Natasha R. Howard
Research Article| October 01 2023 Coming to Terms with the Overturn of Roe v. Wade Natasha R. Howard Natasha R. Howard Natasha R. Howard, PhD, is an assistant professor in Communication Studies at Morehouse College. email: natasha.howard@morehouse.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: natasha.howard@morehouse.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Natasha R. Howard; Coming to Terms with the Overturn of Roe v. Wade. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 545–553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search “I can’t believe they’re really doing this. I just…I have no words.” These were the words on my Instagram story on June 24, 2022, the day the news broke that the Supreme Court was overturning Roe v. Wade. Whenever I’m overwhelmed with thoughts and feelings, often in relation to breaking news related to the rollback of progress connected to issues I care about, I temporarily lose the ability to form coherent thoughts. My anger, rage, and even sadness just hit me all at once. At that moment I felt queasy, like the dread that comes over me at the top of a roller coaster as the big drop creeps up. It’s the same feeling I get when I realize I have lost someone—whether because of a breakup, death, or a relationship becoming broken beyond repair. As the words finally came back to me, all I could think was, “What... You do not currently have access to this content.
研究文章| 2023年10月1日接受罗伊诉韦德案的推翻Natasha R. Howard Natasha R. Howard博士，莫尔豪斯学院传播学助理教授。电子邮件:natasha.howard@morehouse.edu搜索作者的其他作品:本网站PubMed谷歌学者电子邮件:natasha.howard@morehouse.edu Autoethnography(2023) 4(4): 545-553。https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545查看图标查看文章内容图表和表格视频音频补充数据同行评审分享图标分享Facebook Twitter LinkedIn电子邮件工具图标工具获得权限引用图标引用搜索网站引文娜塔莎R.霍华德;接受罗伊诉韦德案的推翻。《民族志杂志》2023年10月1日;4(4): 545-553。doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545下载引文文件:Ris (Zotero)参考文献管理器EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex工具栏搜索搜索下拉菜单工具栏搜索搜索输入搜索输入自动建议过滤你的搜索所有内容Autoethnography杂志搜索“我不敢相信他们真的在做这个。我只是……我不知道该说什么。”这是2022年6月24日，最高法院推翻罗伊诉韦德案的消息传出的那天，我在Instagram上写的故事。每当我被想法和感觉淹没时，通常是与我关心的问题的进展倒退有关的突发新闻有关，我就会暂时失去形成连贯思想的能力。我的愤怒，愤怒，甚至悲伤突然袭来。在那一刻，我感到恶心，就像在过山车的顶端，随着巨大的落差慢慢上升，恐惧笼罩着我。当我意识到我失去了某个人时，无论是因为分手、死亡，还是因为一段无法修复的关系，我都会有同样的感觉。当这句话终于涌上心头时，我满脑子想的都是:“什么……您目前没有访问此内容的权限。
{"title":"Coming to Terms with the Overturn of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>","authors":"Natasha R. Howard","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545","url":null,"abstract":"Research Article| October 01 2023 Coming to Terms with the Overturn of Roe v. Wade Natasha R. Howard Natasha R. Howard Natasha R. Howard, PhD, is an assistant professor in Communication Studies at Morehouse College. email: natasha.howard@morehouse.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: natasha.howard@morehouse.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Natasha R. Howard; Coming to Terms with the Overturn of Roe v. Wade. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 545–553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.545 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search “I can’t believe they’re really doing this. I just…I have no words.” These were the words on my Instagram story on June 24, 2022, the day the news broke that the Supreme Court was overturning Roe v. Wade. Whenever I’m overwhelmed with thoughts and feelings, often in relation to breaking news related to the rollback of progress connected to issues I care about, I temporarily lose the ability to form coherent thoughts. My anger, rage, and even sadness just hit me all at once. At that moment I felt queasy, like the dread that comes over me at the top of a roller coaster as the big drop creeps up. It’s the same feeling I get when I realize I have lost someone—whether because of a breakup, death, or a relationship becoming broken beyond repair. As the words finally came back to me, all I could think was, “What... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568
Cassidy D. Ellis
Research Article| October 01 2023 Electing to Survive: Choosing to be Childfree after Dobbs v. Jackson Cassidy D. Ellis Cassidy D. Ellis Cassidy D. Ellis is an assistant professor in the School of Communication, Film, and Media Studies at the University of Cincinnati. email: ellis2cd@ucmail.uc Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: ellis2cd@ucmail.uc Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 568–576. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Cassidy D. Ellis; Electing to Survive: Choosing to be Childfree after Dobbs v. Jackson. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 568–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search This is an autoethnography I’m still figuring out how to write. Partly because I’m still processing the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court Decision, partly because the work to which I’ve dedicated my whole life was upended by that decision, and partly because my own reproductive futures were affected by that decision. These are thoughts, feelings, and experiences I am still figuring out how to name and negotiate and explain. Partly because I rarely talk about them, partly because they don’t fit into the heteronormative timeline of a cisgender White woman’s life, and partly because I have a tendency to not name, negotiate, or explain things that are hard or that cause me pain. Please don’t read on believing that the fall of Roe was the moment at which “elective” decisions became not so elective or “choices” became exclusive to only those who could access them. We know... You do not currently have access to this content.
{"title":"Electing to Survive","authors":"Cassidy D. Ellis","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568","url":null,"abstract":"Research Article| October 01 2023 Electing to Survive: Choosing to be Childfree after Dobbs v. Jackson Cassidy D. Ellis Cassidy D. Ellis Cassidy D. Ellis is an assistant professor in the School of Communication, Film, and Media Studies at the University of Cincinnati. email: ellis2cd@ucmail.uc Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: ellis2cd@ucmail.uc Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 568–576. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Cassidy D. Ellis; Electing to Survive: Choosing to be Childfree after Dobbs v. Jackson. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 568–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.568 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search This is an autoethnography I’m still figuring out how to write. Partly because I’m still processing the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court Decision, partly because the work to which I’ve dedicated my whole life was upended by that decision, and partly because my own reproductive futures were affected by that decision. These are thoughts, feelings, and experiences I am still figuring out how to name and negotiate and explain. Partly because I rarely talk about them, partly because they don’t fit into the heteronormative timeline of a cisgender White woman’s life, and partly because I have a tendency to not name, negotiate, or explain things that are hard or that cause me pain. Please don’t read on believing that the fall of Roe was the moment at which “elective” decisions became not so elective or “choices” became exclusive to only those who could access them. We know... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"276 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.521
Kurt Borchard
The manuscript, postmodern in content and form, presents a fragmented, looping narrative of the author’s experience watching 2001: A Space Odyssey contrasted against his, his university’s, and his students’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Separate discussions of the film, eras, ideas, and experiences grow to mutually inform. As the film presents several scenes without contextualization or even dialogue, the structure of writing here jumps, repeats, and overlaps, inviting (and evading) individual interpretation by readers. Readers might consider: parallels between the film and the author’s experience as cyclical; a repetition of central issues or themes understood as both eternal and era-specific; and texts informing each era (and those anxiously living through them) differently. The narrative represents contemporary, fragmented spaces of interpretation, discourse, movement, flow, breath, and masks.
{"title":"2021","authors":"Kurt Borchard","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.521","url":null,"abstract":"The manuscript, postmodern in content and form, presents a fragmented, looping narrative of the author’s experience watching 2001: A Space Odyssey contrasted against his, his university’s, and his students’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Separate discussions of the film, eras, ideas, and experiences grow to mutually inform. As the film presents several scenes without contextualization or even dialogue, the structure of writing here jumps, repeats, and overlaps, inviting (and evading) individual interpretation by readers. Readers might consider: parallels between the film and the author’s experience as cyclical; a repetition of central issues or themes understood as both eternal and era-specific; and texts informing each era (and those anxiously living through them) differently. The narrative represents contemporary, fragmented spaces of interpretation, discourse, movement, flow, breath, and masks.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.474
Estefanía Díaz, Silvia Bénard
This article narrates the long journey we have traveled in our attempts to feel part of a community. Using collaborative autoethnography, we trace the labyrinths we have traversed, first in academia and then in Al-Anon. After years of trying to develop a sense of belonging within university life and through the changes of residence that were associated with it, we both found ourselves in Al-Anon as we tried to cope with our family members. The seemingly unrelated paths in our lives came together as we realized that academic life—particularly in this contemporary neoliberal context—was often the very opposite of community building. At the same time, while we had initially attended Al-Anon in a desperate search for help with our loved ones, we unexpectedly learned that we were on the right path for becoming part of something. As a result of these experiences, both of us have developed a better sense of belonging as we have learned and practiced the Al-Anon principles and applied these principles to other areas of our lives, notably the university.
{"title":"Composing a Sense of Belonging","authors":"Estefanía Díaz, Silvia Bénard","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.474","url":null,"abstract":"This article narrates the long journey we have traveled in our attempts to feel part of a community. Using collaborative autoethnography, we trace the labyrinths we have traversed, first in academia and then in Al-Anon. After years of trying to develop a sense of belonging within university life and through the changes of residence that were associated with it, we both found ourselves in Al-Anon as we tried to cope with our family members. The seemingly unrelated paths in our lives came together as we realized that academic life—particularly in this contemporary neoliberal context—was often the very opposite of community building. At the same time, while we had initially attended Al-Anon in a desperate search for help with our loved ones, we unexpectedly learned that we were on the right path for becoming part of something. As a result of these experiences, both of us have developed a better sense of belonging as we have learned and practiced the Al-Anon principles and applied these principles to other areas of our lives, notably the university.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586
Sara Baugh-Harris
Research Article| October 01 2023 ¿Por quién debo gritar? Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Davidson College. email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Sara Baugh-Harris; ¿Por quién debo gritar?. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 586–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search In a recent Vanity Fair article, Molly Jong-Fast, a white American author, notes that before the Supreme Court overthrew Roe v. Wade, she used to think “abortion is healthcare” was a catchy, but hyperbolic statement.1 As she witnesses how the Court’s decision has already wrought damage and misery for so many, she writes: “This loss of bodily autonomy on the federal level has created medical disasters for women all throughout the country.”2 What strikes me in Jong-Fast’s comments is not simply the stark reality she is painting. Rather, it startles me because it is an honest encapsulation of the whiplash many white American women are experiencing as they ponder their own bodily autonomy in serious, material ways, some for the first time since 1973. For many, this reckoning began with Trump’s election in 2016.3 These fears were greatly amplified by stunned outrage as the Supreme Court’s... You do not currently have access to this content.
研究文章| October 01 2023 ?Sara Baugh-Harris是戴维森学院传播研究系的助理教授。电子邮件:sabaugh@davidson.edu搜索作者的其他作品:本网站PubMed谷歌学者电子邮件:sabaugh@davidson.edu Autoethnography(2023) 4(4): 586-593。https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586查看图标查看文章内容图表和表格视频音频补充数据同行评审分享图标分享Facebook Twitter LinkedIn电子邮件工具图标工具获得权限引用图标引用搜索网站引文Sara baughh - harris;“可怜的人?”《民族志杂志》2023年10月1日;4(4): 586-593。doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586下载引文文件:在《名利场》最近的一篇文章中，美国白人作家Molly - jones - fast指出，在最高法院推翻罗伊诉韦德案(Roe v. Wade)之前，她曾认为“堕胎是一种医疗保健”是一种吸引人的说法，但有些夸张当她目睹了法院的决定如何给这么多人带来伤害和痛苦时，她写道:“联邦层面上身体自主权的丧失给全国各地的女性带来了医疗灾难。在钟法斯特的评论中，打动我的不仅仅是她所描绘的残酷现实。更确切地说，它让我感到震惊，因为它真实地反映了许多美国白人女性在认真地、以物质的方式思考自己的身体自主权时所经历的痛苦，有些人是1973年以来第一次这样做。对许多人来说，这种担忧始于2016年特朗普当选。这些担忧被震惊的愤怒大大放大，因为最高法院……您目前没有访问此内容的权限。
{"title":"¿Por quién debo gritar?","authors":"Sara Baugh-Harris","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586","url":null,"abstract":"Research Article| October 01 2023 ¿Por quién debo gritar? Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris Sara Baugh-Harris is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Davidson College. email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: sabaugh@davidson.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Sara Baugh-Harris; ¿Por quién debo gritar?. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 586–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.586 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search In a recent Vanity Fair article, Molly Jong-Fast, a white American author, notes that before the Supreme Court overthrew Roe v. Wade, she used to think “abortion is healthcare” was a catchy, but hyperbolic statement.1 As she witnesses how the Court’s decision has already wrought damage and misery for so many, she writes: “This loss of bodily autonomy on the federal level has created medical disasters for women all throughout the country.”2 What strikes me in Jong-Fast’s comments is not simply the stark reality she is painting. Rather, it startles me because it is an honest encapsulation of the whiplash many white American women are experiencing as they ponder their own bodily autonomy in serious, material ways, some for the first time since 1973. For many, this reckoning began with Trump’s election in 2016.3 These fears were greatly amplified by stunned outrage as the Supreme Court’s... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594
Rose Richards
Book Review| October 01 2023 Review: An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development, by Trude Klevan and Alec Grant Trude Klevan and Alec Grant, An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development. London: Routledge, 2022. 166 pages. 2 BW illustrations. $49.95 (paperback). ISBN 9780367425135 Rose Richards Rose Richards Stellenbosch University rr2@sun.ac.za Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar rr2@sun.ac.za Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 594–597. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Rose Richards; Review: An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development, by Trude Klevan and Alec Grant. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 594–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search One of the questions I’m often asked as an autoethnographer is, “But how do you do autoethnography?” When they ask this, people mean, “What’s the recipe?,” and they want to know about pragmatic things like how to analyze data. What always ends up being omitted from these conversations is a discussion about the philosophical underpinning of autoethnography. This is troubling because that underpinning is essential to how one actually does autoethnography. So, when the opportunity arose to review Klevan and Grant’s book, The Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher, I leapt at it. This slim volume contains an immense amount of information. The work starts with the premise that “qualitative inquiry knowledge development, acquisition, and collaboration are best mediated by the epistemic resource of friendship.”1 I like this for many reasons. One is that it emphasizes the “community” part of “academic community,” the half of the concept most... You do not currently have access to this content.
{"title":"Review: <i>An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development</i>, by Trude Klevan and Alec Grant","authors":"Rose Richards","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594","url":null,"abstract":"Book Review| October 01 2023 Review: An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development, by Trude Klevan and Alec Grant Trude Klevan and Alec Grant, An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development. London: Routledge, 2022. 166 pages. 2 BW illustrations. $49.95 (paperback). ISBN 9780367425135 Rose Richards Rose Richards Stellenbosch University rr2@sun.ac.za Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar rr2@sun.ac.za Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 594–597. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Rose Richards; Review: An Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: A Dialogic View of Academic Development, by Trude Klevan and Alec Grant. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 594–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.594 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search One of the questions I’m often asked as an autoethnographer is, “But how do you do autoethnography?” When they ask this, people mean, “What’s the recipe?,” and they want to know about pragmatic things like how to analyze data. What always ends up being omitted from these conversations is a discussion about the philosophical underpinning of autoethnography. This is troubling because that underpinning is essential to how one actually does autoethnography. So, when the opportunity arose to review Klevan and Grant’s book, The Autoethnography of Becoming a Qualitative Researcher, I leapt at it. This slim volume contains an immense amount of information. The work starts with the premise that “qualitative inquiry knowledge development, acquisition, and collaboration are best mediated by the epistemic resource of friendship.”1 I like this for many reasons. One is that it emphasizes the “community” part of “academic community,” the half of the concept most... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559
Shelby Swafford
Research Article| October 01 2023 Reproducing (in) the Apocalypse Shelby Swafford Shelby Swafford Shelby Swafford is an assistant professor of practice in Communication Studies at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. email: swafford@siu.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: swafford@siu.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Shelby Swafford; Reproducing (in) the Apocalypse. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 559–567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search I’ve been thinking a lot lately about all the stories I’ve told myself about the reasons I had my abortion. This isn’t out of the ordinary for me. I often think and write about my abortion in my research on storytelling as reproductive justice activism—how storytelling “invites us to shift the lens—that is, to imagine the life of another person and to reexamine our own realities and reimagine our own possibilities.”1 I often read others’ stories of their reproductive experiences and advocacy for reproductive freedom.2 I find comfort in their stories, in how stories “help us understand how others think and make decisions,”3 in how stories help us understand how we think and make decisions ourselves. Maybe it’s because I’m in the final stages of writing my dissertation on these stories. Maybe it’s because I’ve been reflecting on my family’s stories of parenthood, the stories of the... You do not currently have access to this content.
{"title":"Reproducing (in) the Apocalypse","authors":"Shelby Swafford","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559","url":null,"abstract":"Research Article| October 01 2023 Reproducing (in) the Apocalypse Shelby Swafford Shelby Swafford Shelby Swafford is an assistant professor of practice in Communication Studies at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. email: swafford@siu.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: swafford@siu.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Shelby Swafford; Reproducing (in) the Apocalypse. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 559–567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.559 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search I’ve been thinking a lot lately about all the stories I’ve told myself about the reasons I had my abortion. This isn’t out of the ordinary for me. I often think and write about my abortion in my research on storytelling as reproductive justice activism—how storytelling “invites us to shift the lens—that is, to imagine the life of another person and to reexamine our own realities and reimagine our own possibilities.”1 I often read others’ stories of their reproductive experiences and advocacy for reproductive freedom.2 I find comfort in their stories, in how stories “help us understand how others think and make decisions,”3 in how stories help us understand how we think and make decisions ourselves. Maybe it’s because I’m in the final stages of writing my dissertation on these stories. Maybe it’s because I’ve been reflecting on my family’s stories of parenthood, the stories of the... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554
Lauren Whatley
Research Article| October 01 2023 Well, That Sure Took a Turn: Teaching Reproductive Justice in Introduction to Women’s Studies Lauren Whatley Lauren Whatley Lauren Whatley is currently a doctoral student of Instructional Leadership at the University of Alabama. email: lawhatley@ua.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: lawhatley@ua.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 554–558. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Lauren Whatley; Well, That Sure Took a Turn: Teaching Reproductive Justice in Introduction to Women’s Studies. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 554–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search The day we discuss reproductive rights in my Introduction to Women’s Studies class at the University of Alabama is as unpredictable as the weather in Tuscaloosa. There is no telling whether the students will stonewall me because they don’t want to have to engage or have so many passionate things to say that I have trouble managing the amount of raised hands. Both have been true, but either way, most students coming in have already formulated some type of idea about their position toward abortion rights, considering themselves to be situated under a pro-life or pro-choice ideology. While I provide context (though not support) for both sides, I also posit that there is more than access to abortion on the docket. When I reflect on the difficulties I’ve had trying to balance the rhetoric students have already heard with their personal beliefs, their feelings, and the content I teach in... You do not currently have access to this content.
{"title":"Well, That Sure Took a Turn","authors":"Lauren Whatley","doi":"10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554","url":null,"abstract":"Research Article| October 01 2023 Well, That Sure Took a Turn: Teaching Reproductive Justice in Introduction to Women’s Studies Lauren Whatley Lauren Whatley Lauren Whatley is currently a doctoral student of Instructional Leadership at the University of Alabama. email: lawhatley@ua.edu Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar email: lawhatley@ua.edu Journal of Autoethnography (2023) 4 (4): 554–558. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Lauren Whatley; Well, That Sure Took a Turn: Teaching Reproductive Justice in Introduction to Women’s Studies. Journal of Autoethnography 1 October 2023; 4 (4): 554–558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.4.554 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of Autoethnography Search The day we discuss reproductive rights in my Introduction to Women’s Studies class at the University of Alabama is as unpredictable as the weather in Tuscaloosa. There is no telling whether the students will stonewall me because they don’t want to have to engage or have so many passionate things to say that I have trouble managing the amount of raised hands. Both have been true, but either way, most students coming in have already formulated some type of idea about their position toward abortion rights, considering themselves to be situated under a pro-life or pro-choice ideology. While I provide context (though not support) for both sides, I also posit that there is more than access to abortion on the docket. When I reflect on the difficulties I’ve had trying to balance the rhetoric students have already heard with their personal beliefs, their feelings, and the content I teach in... You do not currently have access to this content.","PeriodicalId":484440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoethnography","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135502806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：