Stephanie M Reich, Rebecca Dore, Aubree Krager, Y Anthony Chen, Keiana T Mayfield, Deborah Franza, Natasha Cabrera
As digital devices permeate the environments of young children, there is growing concern that media use might be displacing very young children's opportunities to cultivate important developmental skills, such as controlling their emotions and behaviors. Further, given the power of devices to capture children's attention, even when emotionally upset, parents might utilize media to both calm and distract their children, even when such use is counter to professional recommendations for very young children's media use. This study uses data from a longitudinal bilingual (English/Spanish) parenting intervention to assess how mothers' and fathers' parenting stress might be reciprocally related to their use of media to calm or distract their child from infancy to toddlerhood and how such use might be linked to young children's behavior problems from 9 to 30 months. Importantly, bidirectional relationships between the device use for behavior management and children's behavior problems are also considered. With a sample of 419 low-to-moderate income, ethnically diverse parents (210 families), we found that for mothers, parenting stress, device use to calm and distract, and children's behavior problems were reciprocally related over time. These within-subject effects indicate that the relationship between these constructs varies within mother-child dyads. For fathers, only between-subject effects were found for device use to calm and distract and children's behavior problems, indicating differences between fathers in their use of media. Such findings underscore the need to include both mothers and fathers in media research and to consider both parent and child contributions to media use and developmental processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Bidirectional relationships of parenting stress, media use for behavior management, and children's behavior problems from 9 to 30 months.","authors":"Stephanie M Reich, Rebecca Dore, Aubree Krager, Y Anthony Chen, Keiana T Mayfield, Deborah Franza, Natasha Cabrera","doi":"10.1037/dev0002164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As digital devices permeate the environments of young children, there is growing concern that media use might be displacing very young children's opportunities to cultivate important developmental skills, such as controlling their emotions and behaviors. Further, given the power of devices to capture children's attention, even when emotionally upset, parents might utilize media to both calm and distract their children, even when such use is counter to professional recommendations for very young children's media use. This study uses data from a longitudinal bilingual (English/Spanish) parenting intervention to assess how mothers' and fathers' parenting stress might be reciprocally related to their use of media to calm or distract their child from infancy to toddlerhood and how such use might be linked to young children's behavior problems from 9 to 30 months. Importantly, bidirectional relationships between the device use for behavior management and children's behavior problems are also considered. With a sample of 419 low-to-moderate income, ethnically diverse parents (210 families), we found that for mothers, parenting stress, device use to calm and distract, and children's behavior problems were reciprocally related over time. These within-subject effects indicate that the relationship between these constructs varies within mother-child dyads. For fathers, only between-subject effects were found for device use to calm and distract and children's behavior problems, indicating differences between fathers in their use of media. Such findings underscore the need to include both mothers and fathers in media research and to consider both parent and child contributions to media use and developmental processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yuzhen Dong, Charlotte Moore, Janani Ramadurai, Elika Bergelson
Individual differences in early language input are rampant but hard to quantify without resource-intensive naturalistic recordings, posing a challenge for testing links between individual experience and facets of language development like vocabulary growth. We tested whether a quick parent survey on infants' exposure to common nouns could reliably predict nouns' frequency in home recordings (testing its validity) and children's own vocabulary (testing input-learning links). In Study 1 (n = 44; 95% White, 5% mixed-race), we gathered monthly home recordings and exposure surveys every 2 months from 8 to 18 months. Parent-reported exposure to each noun (16/time point, 5-point scale) was compared to the noun's relative frequency in infants' home recordings and to comprehension and production of each noun via parent vocabulary survey (Communicative Development Inventory). Reported exposure significantly predicted noun frequency in home recordings. It also predicted both reported noun comprehension and production, even after accounting for age. Results from an age- and gender-matched cross-sectional sample (Study 2, n = 264, 78% White, 11% mixed-race, 11% other) with the same vocabulary and exposure surveys were consistent, supporting generalizability. These findings suggest a brief word exposure survey can reliably estimate individualized word input and knowledge, at least for highly common nouns. This method complements naturalistic recordings and corpus-based norms by capturing individual variation and enabling more scalable research across linguistic and sociocultural contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Measuring early word exposure in infants: A brief parent-report survey captures individual language input and predicts vocabulary outcomes.","authors":"Yuzhen Dong, Charlotte Moore, Janani Ramadurai, Elika Bergelson","doi":"10.1037/dev0002160","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0002160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individual differences in early language input are rampant but hard to quantify without resource-intensive naturalistic recordings, posing a challenge for testing links between individual experience and facets of language development like vocabulary growth. We tested whether a quick parent survey on infants' exposure to common nouns could reliably predict nouns' frequency in home recordings (testing its validity) and children's own vocabulary (testing input-learning links). In Study 1 (<i>n</i> = 44; 95% White, 5% mixed-race), we gathered monthly home recordings and exposure surveys every 2 months from 8 to 18 months. Parent-reported exposure to each noun (16/time point, 5-point scale) was compared to the noun's relative frequency in infants' home recordings and to comprehension and production of each noun via parent vocabulary survey (Communicative Development Inventory). Reported exposure significantly predicted noun frequency in home recordings. It also predicted both reported noun comprehension and production, even after accounting for age. Results from an age- and gender-matched cross-sectional sample (Study 2, <i>n</i> = 264, 78% White, 11% mixed-race, 11% other) with the same vocabulary and exposure surveys were consistent, supporting generalizability. These findings suggest a brief word exposure survey can reliably estimate individualized word input and knowledge, at least for highly common nouns. This method complements naturalistic recordings and corpus-based norms by capturing individual variation and enabling more scalable research across linguistic and sociocultural contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12974237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender conformity powerfully shapes children's development, yet little experimental work has investigated the antecedents of this conformity. Here, we experimentally tested whether and how threats to children's felt gender typicality-the extent to which they feel typical of their gender group-elicit conformity and whether these effects vary by age and gender. We randomly assigned 147 children ages 5-10 years (70 girls; 79 racial/ethnic minority) to receive feedback suggesting their performance was gender-atypical (threat) or gender-typical (affirmation) on a pair of "gender knowledge games." We then assessed a broad battery of self-report and behavioral measures, which revealed three distinct responses to gender typicality threat: increases in evaluative concern (i.e., worrying about social judgment), typicality-enhancing behaviors (i.e., actively demonstrating gender-typical qualities), and atypicality-avoiding behaviors (i.e., distancing from gender-atypical qualities). Although gender typicality threat heightened children's evaluative concern regardless of their gender or age, only younger girls and older boys enhanced their gender typicality under threat. Moreover, gender typicality threat prompted boys but not girls to engage in atypicality avoidance. These results suggest that although children generally recognize the consequences of gender atypicality, boys become increasingly motivated to demonstrate their masculinity with age, whereas girls become less concerned with proving their femininity. Boys also uniquely learn that avoiding femininity is crucial to performing masculinity, whereas girls may not learn a corresponding masculinity-avoidance norm. These findings inform gender development theory as well as efforts to mitigate the consequences of children's everyday typicality threat experiences (e.g., teasing, bullying). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Falling in line: Children's gender conformity after feedback signaling gender atypicality.","authors":"Adam Stanaland, Andrea C Vial, Andrei Cimpian","doi":"10.1037/dev0002166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002166","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender conformity powerfully shapes children's development, yet little experimental work has investigated the antecedents of this conformity. Here, we experimentally tested whether and how threats to children's felt <i>gender typicality</i>-the extent to which they feel typical of their gender group-elicit conformity and whether these effects vary by age and gender. We randomly assigned 147 children ages 5-10 years (70 girls; 79 racial/ethnic minority) to receive feedback suggesting their performance was gender-atypical (threat) or gender-typical (affirmation) on a pair of \"gender knowledge games.\" We then assessed a broad battery of self-report and behavioral measures, which revealed three distinct responses to gender typicality threat: increases in evaluative concern (i.e., worrying about social judgment), typicality-enhancing behaviors (i.e., actively demonstrating gender-typical qualities), and atypicality-avoiding behaviors (i.e., distancing from gender-atypical qualities). Although gender typicality threat heightened children's evaluative concern regardless of their gender or age, only younger girls and older boys enhanced their gender typicality under threat. Moreover, gender typicality threat prompted boys but not girls to engage in atypicality avoidance. These results suggest that although children generally recognize the consequences of gender atypicality, boys become increasingly motivated to demonstrate their masculinity with age, whereas girls become less concerned with proving their femininity. Boys also uniquely learn that avoiding femininity is crucial to performing masculinity, whereas girls may not learn a corresponding masculinity-avoidance norm. These findings inform gender development theory as well as efforts to mitigate the consequences of children's everyday typicality threat experiences (e.g., teasing, bullying). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hin Wing Tse, Jinjin Yan, Fatima Varner, Su Yeong Kim
Limited attention has been given to ethnic-racial identity (ERI) development beyond emerging adulthood, which is a critical gap identified in the Lifespan Model of ERI. Previous research suggests that age of arrival in a host country may shape one's overall exposure to sociocultural contexts. The adaptation process can also be stressful, particularly as immigrants often navigate challenges related to "fitting in" and the perception of being seen as outsiders. These experiences could trigger various ERI trajectories at a later stage of life (e.g., during adulthood). Using a three-wave longitudinal data set of 596 Mexican-born mothers, three independent growth mixture models were estimated to identify variations in trajectory patterns of ERI exploration, resolution, and centrality. For exploration and resolution, high-stable and low-increasing trajectories were found. For centrality, high-mild decline and low-increasing trajectories were found. Associations between age of arrival, acculturative stressors (i.e., feeling like a misfit and foreigner stress), and trajectory patterns were examined, controlling for age, income, and education at Wave 1. Results showed that greater feelings of misfit at Wave 1 predicted a higher likelihood of belonging to the high-stable exploration and high-mild decline centrality groups, versus belonging to the low-increasing groups. These findings add to our understanding of the Lifespan Model of ERI by showing that ERI evolves beyond emerging adulthood. This study highlights the role of ongoing acculturative stress in shaping identity development, with potential clinical implications for psychological and sociocultural adaptation in adult immigrants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Trajectory patterns of ethnic-racial identity among immigrant mothers: The predictive role of acculturative stress.","authors":"Hin Wing Tse, Jinjin Yan, Fatima Varner, Su Yeong Kim","doi":"10.1037/dev0002172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited attention has been given to ethnic-racial identity (ERI) development beyond emerging adulthood, which is a critical gap identified in the Lifespan Model of ERI. Previous research suggests that age of arrival in a host country may shape one's overall exposure to sociocultural contexts. The adaptation process can also be stressful, particularly as immigrants often navigate challenges related to \"fitting in\" and the perception of being seen as outsiders. These experiences could trigger various ERI trajectories at a later stage of life (e.g., during adulthood). Using a three-wave longitudinal data set of 596 Mexican-born mothers, three independent growth mixture models were estimated to identify variations in trajectory patterns of ERI <i>exploration, resolution</i>, and <i>centrality.</i> For exploration and resolution, <i>high-stable</i> and <i>low-increasing</i> trajectories were found. For centrality, <i>high-mild decline</i> and <i>low-increasing</i> trajectories were found. Associations between age of arrival, acculturative stressors (i.e., feeling like a misfit and foreigner stress), and trajectory patterns were examined, controlling for age, income, and education at Wave 1. Results showed that greater feelings of misfit at Wave 1 predicted a higher likelihood of belonging to the high-stable exploration and high-mild decline centrality groups, versus belonging to the low-increasing groups. These findings add to our understanding of the Lifespan Model of ERI by showing that ERI evolves beyond emerging adulthood. This study highlights the role of ongoing acculturative stress in shaping identity development, with potential clinical implications for psychological and sociocultural adaptation in adult immigrants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1037/dev0002025
Devon N Gangi, Ana-Maria Iosif, Shyeena Maqbool, Monique M Hill, Chandni Parikh, Gregory S Young, Sally Ozonoff
Prospective studies of later born siblings of autistic individuals often focus on predicting autism diagnosis. Studies concentrating on siblings who do not develop autism have found subclinical atypicalities in some children as early as the first year of life. However, when followed to school-age, the continuity of these findings has been mixed. We tracked nonautistic siblings (n = 151 higher familial likelihood of autism, n = 115 lower likelihood) longitudinally from infancy to 6-16 years of age when participants completed a battery of social communication measures (parent report and direct observation/administration). Using latent profile analysis, we derived groupings based on patterns of performance across measures. Three groups were identified: Class 1 (45.5%), Class 2 (45.2%), and Class 3 (9.3%)-characterized by higher, intermediate, and lower school-age social communication abilities, respectively. We then examined the performance of these classes on independent measures of pragmatic language, reciprocal social interaction, and cognition. Class 3 demonstrated social communication differences that were most evident with novel interactive partners (e.g., examiners) and scored lower on IQ and academic achievement measures, indicating that social communication differences captured by the latent profile analysis were part of a broader pattern of developmental differences. Using data collected in the first 3 years of life, we found that the school-age classes began showing differences by 12-18 months of age-evidence of continuity between early behavior and later development. Findings suggest that when early childhood challenges are observed in siblings of autistic children, even those not meeting criteria for autism, they should be monitored over time and additional support offered as needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
对自闭症患者较晚出生的兄弟姐妹进行的前瞻性研究往往侧重于预测自闭症的诊断。对未患自闭症的兄弟姐妹进行的研究发现,一些孩子早在出生后第一年就出现了亚临床非典型性。然而,当追踪到学龄时,这些发现的连续性就有好有坏了。我们跟踪了从婴儿期到6-16岁的非自闭症兄弟姐妹(n = 151高自闭症家庭可能性,n = 115低自闭症家庭可能性),当参与者完成一系列社会沟通测量(父母报告和直接观察/管理)。使用潜在轮廓分析,我们根据不同措施的表现模式得出分组。三组被确定为:1班(45.5%),2班(45.2%)和3班(9.3%)-分别具有较高,中等和较低学龄社会沟通能力。然后,我们检查了这些班级在语用语言、互惠社会互动和认知方面的独立指标的表现。第三班的社会沟通差异在新的互动伙伴(如考官)身上表现得最为明显,在智商和学业成绩方面得分较低,这表明潜在特征分析所捕捉到的社会沟通差异是更广泛的发展差异模式的一部分。通过收集3岁前的数据,我们发现学龄班在12-18个月大的时候开始表现出差异——早期行为和后期发展之间的连续性。研究结果表明,当在自闭症儿童的兄弟姐妹中观察到早期儿童挑战时,即使是那些不符合自闭症标准的孩子,也应该长期监测,并根据需要提供额外的支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Continuity in social communication development among school-aged siblings of autistic children.","authors":"Devon N Gangi, Ana-Maria Iosif, Shyeena Maqbool, Monique M Hill, Chandni Parikh, Gregory S Young, Sally Ozonoff","doi":"10.1037/dev0002025","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0002025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective studies of later born siblings of autistic individuals often focus on predicting autism diagnosis. Studies concentrating on siblings who do not develop autism have found subclinical atypicalities in some children as early as the first year of life. However, when followed to school-age, the continuity of these findings has been mixed. We tracked nonautistic siblings (<i>n</i> = 151 higher familial likelihood of autism, <i>n</i> = 115 lower likelihood) longitudinally from infancy to 6-16 years of age when participants completed a battery of social communication measures (parent report and direct observation/administration). Using latent profile analysis, we derived groupings based on patterns of performance across measures. Three groups were identified: <i>Class 1</i> (45.5%), <i>Class 2</i> (45.2%), and <i>Class 3</i> (9.3%)-characterized by higher, intermediate, and lower school-age social communication abilities, respectively. We then examined the performance of these classes on independent measures of pragmatic language, reciprocal social interaction, and cognition. <i>Class 3</i> demonstrated social communication differences that were most evident with novel interactive partners (e.g., examiners) and scored lower on IQ and academic achievement measures, indicating that social communication differences captured by the latent profile analysis were part of a broader pattern of developmental differences. Using data collected in the first 3 years of life, we found that the school-age classes began showing differences by 12-18 months of age-evidence of continuity between early behavior and later development. Findings suggest that when early childhood challenges are observed in siblings of autistic children, even those not meeting criteria for autism, they should be monitored over time and additional support offered as needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"678-692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352373/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144610005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-04-28DOI: 10.1037/dev0001974
Eddie Brummelman, Stathis Grapsas, Reinout W Wiers
Although it is normative for children to desire praise, some might show addiction to praise. We define praise addiction as a strong reliance on praise: a constant seeking of praise, prioritization of praise-seeking, and distress when praise is not received. Some scholars argue that praise addiction is central to narcissism. Despite extensive theorizing, empirical research on praise addiction is lacking. With this multi-informant survey and experimental study, we investigated the phenotype, socialization, and manifestations of praise addiction in a nonclinical sample of children (N = 221, ages 7-13, 91% Dutch, and one of their parents, 89% Dutch). We developed a parent-report measure of praise addiction as a continuous trait, based on substance use disorder criteria. We measured children's subjective praise cravings and adapted a classic drug self-administration paradigm to capture children's efforts to obtain praise. While average praise addiction levels were low, there were meaningful individual differences. Children higher in praise addiction had lower self-esteem, were more sensitive to reward, and experienced higher parental overvaluation and lower parental warmth. Also, they exerted greater effort to obtain praise, even though the effort required to obtain it increased. By contrast, children higher in narcissism did not have lower self-esteem, were not more sensitive to reward, and experienced higher parental overvaluation without lower parental warmth. They did not exert greater effort to obtain praise but did experience elevated praise cravings. This study uncovers the nature of praise addiction, demonstrates its separateness from narcissism, and validates that children high in praise addiction may pursue praise vigorously. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然孩子渴望表扬是正常的,但有些孩子可能会表现出对表扬的上瘾。我们将赞美成瘾定义为对赞美的强烈依赖:不断寻求赞美,优先寻求赞美,当没有得到赞美时感到痛苦。一些学者认为,赞美成瘾是自恋的核心。尽管有广泛的理论研究,但缺乏对表扬成瘾的实证研究。通过这项多信息来源调查和实验研究,我们调查了非临床儿童样本(N = 221, 7-13岁,91%荷兰人,其父母之一,89%荷兰人)中表扬成瘾的表型、社会化和表现。我们根据物质使用障碍的标准,开发了一种家长报告方法,将表扬成瘾作为一种持续的特征。我们测量了儿童的主观表扬渴望,并采用经典的药物自我给药范式来捕捉儿童获得表扬的努力。虽然平均表扬成瘾程度较低,但存在显著的个体差异。表扬成瘾程度越高的孩子,自尊心越低,对奖励更敏感,父母的高估程度越高,父母的温暖程度越低。此外,他们会付出更大的努力来获得表扬,尽管获得表扬所需的努力增加了。相比之下,自恋程度高的孩子并没有更低的自尊,也没有对奖励更敏感,他们经历了更高的父母高估,但没有更低的父母温暖。他们并没有付出更大的努力来获得赞美,但确实经历了更高的赞美渴望。本研究揭示了表扬成瘾的本质,证明了表扬成瘾与自恋的分离性,并证实了高度表扬成瘾的儿童可能会强烈地追求表扬。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Praise addiction in children.","authors":"Eddie Brummelman, Stathis Grapsas, Reinout W Wiers","doi":"10.1037/dev0001974","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although it is normative for children to desire praise, some might show addiction to praise. We define praise addiction as a strong reliance on praise: a constant seeking of praise, prioritization of praise-seeking, and distress when praise is not received. Some scholars argue that praise addiction is central to narcissism. Despite extensive theorizing, empirical research on praise addiction is lacking. With this multi-informant survey and experimental study, we investigated the phenotype, socialization, and manifestations of praise addiction in a nonclinical sample of children (<i>N</i> = 221, ages 7-13, 91% Dutch, and one of their parents, 89% Dutch). We developed a parent-report measure of praise addiction as a continuous trait, based on substance use disorder criteria. We measured children's subjective praise cravings and adapted a classic drug self-administration paradigm to capture children's efforts to obtain praise. While average praise addiction levels were low, there were meaningful individual differences. Children higher in praise addiction had lower self-esteem, were more sensitive to reward, and experienced higher parental overvaluation and lower parental warmth. Also, they exerted greater effort to obtain praise, even though the effort required to obtain it increased. By contrast, children higher in narcissism did not have lower self-esteem, were not more sensitive to reward, and experienced higher parental overvaluation without lower parental warmth. They did not exert greater effort to obtain praise but did experience elevated praise cravings. This study uncovers the nature of praise addiction, demonstrates its separateness from narcissism, and validates that children high in praise addiction may pursue praise vigorously. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"597-610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144042142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1037/dev0001991
Shauna M Bowes, Kylee Novick, Stella F Lourenco, Arber Tasimi
When making social judgments, children prefer confidence over uncertainty. At the same time, they also value calibration and accuracy. How, then, do children reason about calibrated uncertainty, or intellectual humility, versus unwarranted confidence, or intellectual arrogance? Here we examined whether 4- to 11-year-olds evaluated intellectually humble individuals as more likable, more knowledgeable, nicer, and smarter than intellectually arrogant individuals. Across two studies involving 229 children (Study 1: N = 111, 59% White, 39% girls; Study 2: N = 118, 66% White, 49% girls), we found that children, by the age of 5.5 years, preferred an intellectually humble over an intellectually arrogant individual, with this preference strengthening over development. Moreover, children preferred intellectual humility over intellectual arrogance both when an intellectually humble individual appeared to be accurate (Study 1) and when it was unclear whether they were accurate (Study 2). Altogether, these findings indicate that children do not prioritize unwarranted confidence more than calibrated uncertainty in their social judgments. We conclude by highlighting pressing directions for future research surrounding what makes children prefer intellectual humility and why. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Do children value intellectual humility over intellectual arrogance?","authors":"Shauna M Bowes, Kylee Novick, Stella F Lourenco, Arber Tasimi","doi":"10.1037/dev0001991","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001991","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When making social judgments, children prefer confidence over uncertainty. At the same time, they also value calibration and accuracy. How, then, do children reason about calibrated uncertainty, or intellectual humility, versus unwarranted confidence, or <i>intellectual arrogance</i>? Here we examined whether 4- to 11-year-olds evaluated intellectually humble individuals as more likable, more knowledgeable, nicer, and smarter than intellectually arrogant individuals. Across two studies involving 229 children (Study 1: <i>N</i> = 111, 59% White, 39% girls; Study 2: <i>N</i> = 118, 66% White, 49% girls), we found that children, by the age of 5.5 years, preferred an intellectually humble over an intellectually arrogant individual, with this preference strengthening over development. Moreover, children preferred intellectual humility over intellectual arrogance both when an intellectually humble individual appeared to be accurate (Study 1) and when it was unclear whether they were accurate (Study 2). Altogether, these findings indicate that children do not prioritize unwarranted confidence more than calibrated uncertainty in their social judgments. We conclude by highlighting pressing directions for future research surrounding what makes children prefer intellectual humility and why. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"611-623"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144095734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1037/dev0001916
Patricia Chen, Khai Qing Chua, Hui Yan Lim, Yilin Sharon Hoe, Qiao Kang Teo, Gregory M Walton, Carol S Dweck
Overcoming challenges to achieve success involves being able to spontaneously come up with effective strategies to address different task demands. Research has linked individual differences in such strategy generation and use to optimal development over time and greater success across many areas of life. Yet, there is surprisingly little experimental evidence that tests how we might help young children to spontaneously generate and apply effective strategies across different challenging tasks. We test this in an area important to development: delaying gratification. To do this, we developed a "strategic mindset" storybook that encouraged children, when waiting felt hard, to ask themselves strategy-eliciting questions, such as: "What can I try to be better at this?" In two experiments (N = 237), 5- to 6-year-old children who read the strategic mindset storybook with an experimenter (vs. a control storybook) waited significantly longer to receive desirable treats (Experiments 1 and 2) and to watch an appealing YouTube video (Experiment 2). Moreover, they were able to wait longer because they spontaneously generated and applied a greater number of effective waiting strategies. Going beyond classic research that taught children specific strategies to delay gratification, our results suggest that our new "metacognitive" approach can empower children's self-regulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
克服挑战以获得成功包括能够自发地提出有效的策略来应对不同的任务需求。研究已经将这些策略产生和使用的个体差异与长期的最佳发展和生活中许多领域的更大成功联系起来。然而,令人惊讶的是,几乎没有实验证据可以测试我们如何帮助幼儿在不同的挑战性任务中自发地产生和应用有效的策略。我们在一个对开发很重要的领域进行了测试:延迟满足。为了做到这一点,我们开发了一本“战略思维”故事书,鼓励孩子们在等待感到困难时,问自己一些引发战略的问题,比如:“我能试着做得更好吗?”在两个实验中(N = 237), 5- 6岁的孩子在实验者的陪同下阅读了策略心态故事书(与对照故事书相比),他们等待的时间明显更长,以获得理想的食物(实验1和2),并观看了吸引人的YouTube视频(实验2)。此外,他们能够等待的时间更长,因为他们自发地产生并应用了更多有效的等待策略。我们的研究结果超越了教导儿童延迟满足的具体策略的经典研究,表明我们新的“元认知”方法可以增强儿童的自我调节能力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A strategic mindset enhances children's generation of effective strategies and delay of gratification across tasks.","authors":"Patricia Chen, Khai Qing Chua, Hui Yan Lim, Yilin Sharon Hoe, Qiao Kang Teo, Gregory M Walton, Carol S Dweck","doi":"10.1037/dev0001916","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overcoming challenges to achieve success involves being able to spontaneously come up with effective strategies to address different task demands. Research has linked individual differences in such strategy generation and use to optimal development over time and greater success across many areas of life. Yet, there is surprisingly little experimental evidence that tests how we might help young children to spontaneously generate and apply effective strategies across different challenging tasks. We test this in an area important to development: delaying gratification. To do this, we developed a \"strategic mindset\" storybook that encouraged children, when waiting felt hard, to ask themselves strategy-eliciting questions, such as: \"What can I try to be better at this?\" In two experiments (<i>N</i> = 237), 5- to 6-year-old children who read the strategic mindset storybook with an experimenter (vs. a control storybook) waited significantly longer to receive desirable treats (Experiments 1 and 2) and to watch an appealing YouTube video (Experiment 2). Moreover, they were able to wait longer because they spontaneously generated and applied a greater number of effective waiting strategies. Going beyond classic research that taught children specific strategies to delay gratification, our results suggest that our new \"metacognitive\" approach can empower children's self-regulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"544-556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-01-13DOI: 10.1037/dev0001910
Melis Muradoglu, Bethany Lassetter, Madison N Sewell, Lenna Ontai, Christopher M Napolitano, Carol Dweck, Kali Trzesniewski, Andrei Cimpian
Adults hold a broad range of beliefs about intellectual ability. Key examples include beliefs about its malleability, its distribution in the population, whether high levels of it ("brilliance") are necessary for success, its origins, and its responsiveness to intervention. Here, we examined the structure and motivational significance of this network of consequential beliefs in a sample of elementary school-age children (5- to 11-year-olds, N = 231; 116 girls, 112 boys, three gender nonbinary children; predominantly White and Asian children from relatively high-income backgrounds). We assessed five beliefs: (a) growth mindsets (malleability), (b) universal mindsets (distribution), (c) brilliance beliefs (necessity for success), and beliefs about ability's (d) innateness and (e) responsiveness to intervention. Even among the youngest children, these beliefs were empirically distinguishable and also largely coherent, in that they related to each other in expected ways. Moreover, the five beliefs assessed here were differentially related to children's learning (vs. performance) goals, preference for challenging tasks, and evaluative concern (i.e., concern that mistakes will lead others to evaluate the self negatively). Even when adjusting for age, children with growth mindsets were oriented toward learning goals and preferred challenging tasks; children who believed ability has innate origins preferred performance goals; and younger (but not older) children who thought success required brilliance expressed more concern over being evaluated. These findings speak to the multifaceted nature of children's concepts of ability and highlight their significance for children's achievement-related attitudes and behavior in the early school years. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
成年人对智力有各种各样的看法。关键的例子包括对其可塑性的信念,在人群中的分布,是否高水平的它(“才华”)是成功的必要条件,它的起源,以及它对干预的反应。本研究以小学学龄儿童(5- 11岁,N = 231;116名女生,112名男生,三性别非二元儿童;主要是来自相对高收入家庭的白人和亚裔儿童)。我们评估了五种信念:(a)成长心态(可塑性),(b)普遍心态(分布),(c)辉煌信念(成功的必要性),以及关于能力的信念(d)先天和(e)对干预的反应性。即使在最小的孩子中,这些信念在经验上也是可区分的,而且在很大程度上是连贯的,因为它们以预期的方式相互关联。此外,这里评估的五种信念与儿童的学习(与表现)目标、对挑战性任务的偏好和评价性关注(即担心错误会导致他人对自己的负面评价)有不同的关系。即使在调整年龄时,具有成长型心态的儿童也更倾向于学习目标,更喜欢具有挑战性的任务;相信能力具有先天起源的儿童更倾向于表现目标;认为成功需要才华的年幼(但不是年长)的孩子对被评价表现出更多的担忧。这些发现说明了儿童能力概念的多面性,并强调了它们对儿童早期上学时期与成就相关的态度和行为的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The structure and motivational significance of early beliefs about ability.","authors":"Melis Muradoglu, Bethany Lassetter, Madison N Sewell, Lenna Ontai, Christopher M Napolitano, Carol Dweck, Kali Trzesniewski, Andrei Cimpian","doi":"10.1037/dev0001910","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adults hold a broad range of beliefs about intellectual ability. Key examples include beliefs about its malleability, its distribution in the population, whether high levels of it (\"brilliance\") are necessary for success, its origins, and its responsiveness to intervention. Here, we examined the structure and motivational significance of this network of consequential beliefs in a sample of elementary school-age children (5- to 11-year-olds, <i>N</i> = 231; 116 girls, 112 boys, three gender nonbinary children; predominantly White and Asian children from relatively high-income backgrounds). We assessed five beliefs: (a) growth mindsets (malleability), (b) universal mindsets (distribution), (c) brilliance beliefs (necessity for success), and beliefs about ability's (d) innateness and (e) responsiveness to intervention. Even among the youngest children, these beliefs were empirically distinguishable and also largely coherent, in that they related to each other in expected ways. Moreover, the five beliefs assessed here were differentially related to children's learning (vs. performance) goals, preference for challenging tasks, and evaluative concern (i.e., concern that mistakes will lead others to evaluate the self negatively). Even when adjusting for age, children with growth mindsets were oriented toward learning goals and preferred challenging tasks; children who believed ability has innate origins preferred performance goals; and younger (but not older) children who thought success required brilliance expressed more concern over being evaluated. These findings speak to the multifaceted nature of children's concepts of ability and highlight their significance for children's achievement-related attitudes and behavior in the early school years. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"583-596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.1037/dev0001946
Fanxiao Wani Qiu, Elizabeth Gottesman, Jeanie Cox, Henrike Moll
We examined an understudied aspect of children's pedagogical cognition and investigated whether children selectively transmit objective information. In three experiments (N = 168), 5- and 6-year-olds were asked to distinguish between objective and subjective statements (Experiment 1) and to choose objective or subjective information to pass on to others (Experiments 2 and 3). Children of both ages distinguished between the two types of statements, OR = 19.1, and preferentially transmitted more objective than subjective information when asked to teach, OR = 5.06. A control condition, in which participants were asked to share information with a peer, found that 5- and 6-year-olds also favored sharing objective information in a nonpedagogical context, OR = 1.96. Critically, children taught more objective information when placed in a pedagogical stance compared to a conversational context, OR = 2.31. These findings contribute to the growing body of work suggesting that children recognize teaching as a unique communicative mechanism, one that calls for the propagation of objective information, not subjective opinion. Our study furthers the understanding of how young children's pedagogical knowledge and competence develop. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Young children teach objective facts as opposed to subjective opinion.","authors":"Fanxiao Wani Qiu, Elizabeth Gottesman, Jeanie Cox, Henrike Moll","doi":"10.1037/dev0001946","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined an understudied aspect of children's pedagogical cognition and investigated whether children selectively transmit objective information. In three experiments (<i>N</i> = 168), 5- and 6-year-olds were asked to distinguish between objective and subjective statements (Experiment 1) and to choose objective or subjective information to pass on to others (Experiments 2 and 3). Children of both ages distinguished between the two types of statements, <i>OR</i> = 19.1, and preferentially transmitted more objective than subjective information when asked to teach, <i>OR</i> = 5.06. A control condition, in which participants were asked to share information with a peer, found that 5- and 6-year-olds also favored sharing objective information in a nonpedagogical context, <i>OR</i> = 1.96. Critically, children taught more objective information when placed in a pedagogical stance compared to a conversational context, <i>OR</i> = 2.31. These findings contribute to the growing body of work suggesting that children recognize teaching as a unique communicative mechanism, one that calls for the propagation of objective information, not subjective opinion. Our study furthers the understanding of how young children's pedagogical knowledge and competence develop. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"557-571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143524657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}