Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-31DOI: 10.1037/dev0001956
Jet Uy Buenconsejo, Laura Ferrer-Wreder, Nor Ba'yah Abdul Kadir, Steven Krauss, Yue Yu, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Angela Oktavia Suryani, Priyoth Kittiteerasack, Radosveta Dimitrova
Positive youth development (PYD) has gained considerable traction among developmental scientists, but past studies were generally conducted among youth samples from Minority World countries. This study investigated the factorial validity of the newly developed 7Cs model of PYD (competence, confidence, connection, character, caring, contribution, and creativity). Specifically, we compared four measurement models (one-factor, seven-factor, higher order, and bifactor) among emerging adults living in five Southeast Asian countries. The study also aimed to establish evidence of measurement invariance across gender, age, education, and country of origin. Criterion-related validity was also sought using COVID-19 socially responsive behaviors and anxiety. Controlling for the influence of gender, age, and education, sample-level comparisons were also performed on the 7Cs. Data came from 1,888 emerging adults (Mage = 24.10; SDage = 6.89) from Indonesia (n = 253), Malaysia (n = 289), the Philippines (n = 496), Singapore (n = 306), and Thailand (n = 544) during the pandemic. The results supported the superiority of the seven-factor model, which exhibited strict invariance across gender, age, and education and partial scalar invariance across country of origin. The 7Cs exhibited mixed associations with the pandemic-related measures. Significant differences were found in the 7Cs across the five countries. The study provides additional evidence on the theoretical validity of the 7Cs model among youth from understudied settings, while also highlighting avenues for refining current PYD measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 7Cs of positive youth development among emerging adults in Southeast Asia.","authors":"Jet Uy Buenconsejo, Laura Ferrer-Wreder, Nor Ba'yah Abdul Kadir, Steven Krauss, Yue Yu, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Angela Oktavia Suryani, Priyoth Kittiteerasack, Radosveta Dimitrova","doi":"10.1037/dev0001956","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive youth development (PYD) has gained considerable traction among developmental scientists, but past studies were generally conducted among youth samples from Minority World countries. This study investigated the factorial validity of the newly developed 7Cs model of PYD (competence, confidence, connection, character, caring, contribution, and creativity). Specifically, we compared four measurement models (one-factor, seven-factor, higher order, and bifactor) among emerging adults living in five Southeast Asian countries. The study also aimed to establish evidence of measurement invariance across gender, age, education, and country of origin. Criterion-related validity was also sought using COVID-19 socially responsive behaviors and anxiety. Controlling for the influence of gender, age, and education, sample-level comparisons were also performed on the 7Cs. Data came from 1,888 emerging adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.10; <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 6.89) from Indonesia (<i>n</i> = 253), Malaysia (<i>n</i> = 289), the Philippines (<i>n</i> = 496), Singapore (<i>n</i> = 306), and Thailand (<i>n</i> = 544) during the pandemic. The results supported the superiority of the seven-factor model, which exhibited strict invariance across gender, age, and education and partial scalar invariance across country of origin. The 7Cs exhibited mixed associations with the pandemic-related measures. Significant differences were found in the 7Cs across the five countries. The study provides additional evidence on the theoretical validity of the 7Cs model among youth from understudied settings, while also highlighting avenues for refining current PYD measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"176-189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1037/dev0001967
Nebi Sümer, Feyza Corapci, Fatma Umut Beşpınar
Parental ethnotheories delineate culturally shared beliefs about the nature of children and normative parenting in a particular cultural niche. Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we assessed parental ethnotheories in a non-White, educated, industrialized, rich, and developed cultural context of Türkiye and developed a parental beliefs scale (PBS) with a culturally informed emic approach in two studies. Study 1 relied on semistructured interviews with 125 Turkish parents (79 mothers, 46 fathers) to better understand parents' beliefs on the child's nature and proper parenting with particular attention to the key demographic characteristics reflecting intracultural diversity. This qualitative inquiry informed the generation of items for a PBS about the nature of children and parenting. In Study 2, we investigated the factor structure, measurement invariance, and the predictive power of the PBS on parenting behaviors with a nationally representative sample of 1,397 parents (796 mothers, 601 fathers) of children aged 3-17 years. Factor analysis revealed three factors representing constraining beliefs, autonomy-enabling beliefs, and beliefs in the malleability of the child. Structural and measurement invariance analyses partially supported the equivalence of the three-factor structure across parent and child gender and child age groups. Regression analyses indicated that constraining beliefs strongly and positively predicted psychological control and punitive behaviors. Autonomy-enabling beliefs predicted positive parenting, while malleability beliefs primarily predicted sociocultural control. Parent education and socioeconomic status moderated the effects of parental beliefs on parenting behaviors. The results were discussed based on parents' gender and socioeconomic status within a developing country, exemplifying a culturally informed assessment approach for the majority world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
父母民族理论描述了文化上对儿童本质的共同信念和特定文化利基中的规范育儿。采用顺序混合方法设计,我们在非白人、受过教育、工业化、富裕和发达的 rkiye文化背景下评估了父母的民族理论,并在两项研究中采用文化信息的emic方法开发了父母信仰量表(PBS)。研究1依赖于对125名土耳其父母(79名母亲,46名父亲)的半结构化访谈,以更好地了解父母对孩子本性和适当养育的信念,特别关注反映文化内多样性的关键人口统计学特征。这一定性调查为PBS关于儿童和养育的性质的项目的生成提供了信息。在研究2中,我们以全国1,397名3-17岁儿童家长(796名母亲,601名父亲)为样本,研究了PBS对养育行为的因素结构、测量不变量和预测能力。因子分析揭示了三个因素分别代表约束信念、自主支持信念和儿童可塑性信念。结构和测量不变性分析部分支持三因素结构在父母和儿童性别和儿童年龄组之间的等效性。回归分析表明,约束信念对心理控制和惩罚行为具有显著的正向预测作用。自主能力信念预测积极的养育方式,而可塑性信念主要预测社会文化控制。父母教育程度和社会经济地位对父母信仰对父母行为的影响有调节作用。根据发展中国家父母的性别和社会经济地位对结果进行了讨论,为大多数国家提供了一种了解文化的评估方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Uncovering parental ethnotheories in Türkiye: Parental beliefs and practices linkage.","authors":"Nebi Sümer, Feyza Corapci, Fatma Umut Beşpınar","doi":"10.1037/dev0001967","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001967","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parental ethnotheories delineate culturally shared beliefs about the nature of children and normative parenting in a particular cultural niche. Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we assessed parental ethnotheories in a non-White, educated, industrialized, rich, and developed cultural context of Türkiye and developed a parental beliefs scale (PBS) with a culturally informed emic approach in two studies. Study 1 relied on semistructured interviews with 125 Turkish parents (79 mothers, 46 fathers) to better understand parents' beliefs on the child's nature and proper parenting with particular attention to the key demographic characteristics reflecting intracultural diversity. This qualitative inquiry informed the generation of items for a PBS about the nature of children and parenting. In Study 2, we investigated the factor structure, measurement invariance, and the predictive power of the PBS on parenting behaviors with a nationally representative sample of 1,397 parents (796 mothers, 601 fathers) of children aged 3-17 years. Factor analysis revealed three factors representing constraining beliefs, autonomy-enabling beliefs, and beliefs in the malleability of the child. Structural and measurement invariance analyses partially supported the equivalence of the three-factor structure across parent and child gender and child age groups. Regression analyses indicated that constraining beliefs strongly and positively predicted psychological control and punitive behaviors. Autonomy-enabling beliefs predicted positive parenting, while malleability beliefs primarily predicted sociocultural control. Parent education and socioeconomic status moderated the effects of parental beliefs on parenting behaviors. The results were discussed based on parents' gender and socioeconomic status within a developing country, exemplifying a culturally informed assessment approach for the majority world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"44-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1037/dev0002074
Yoonsun Choi, Michael Park, Yishan Shen, Meng-Run Zhang, Kihyun Kim
Using data from three interrelated studies of Korean adolescents in South Korea (N = 524; Mage = 14.98), China (N = 267; Mage = 15.24), and the United States (N = 408; Mage = 14.76), this study tested the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of multiple measures of family process, including those originally developed for subgroups of Asian Americans and commonly used Western measures. The results showed excellent psychometric properties of the scales in each group and supported metric and scalar invariances, at least partial for some, of the examined measures, providing cross-culturally comparable instruments for diverse Korean communities across the United States and majority countries. The findings also showed nuanced cultural variations despite similar conceptualizations of the constructs across groups. The study compared the means of the family process measures and examined the associations among these measures and with youth adjustments. The results from these urban samples in three different sociopolitical and economic contexts may reflect a complex interplay of culture and minority status in shaping the family process and its impact on youth development, illustrating how the modern Korean family process is flexible and responsive to local contexts. The findings of this study present useful instruments and warrant additional research on the antecedents, mechanisms, and implications of the family process to maximize youth potential in respective contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Measures of family process: Psychometric properties and invariance testing across South Koreans, Korean Chinese, and Korean Americans.","authors":"Yoonsun Choi, Michael Park, Yishan Shen, Meng-Run Zhang, Kihyun Kim","doi":"10.1037/dev0002074","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0002074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using data from three interrelated studies of Korean adolescents in South Korea (<i>N</i> = 524; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.98), China (<i>N</i> = 267; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.24), and the United States (<i>N</i> = 408; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.76), this study tested the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of multiple measures of family process, including those originally developed for subgroups of Asian Americans and commonly used Western measures. The results showed excellent psychometric properties of the scales in each group and supported metric and scalar invariances, at least partial for some, of the examined measures, providing cross-culturally comparable instruments for diverse Korean communities across the United States and majority countries. The findings also showed nuanced cultural variations despite similar conceptualizations of the constructs across groups. The study compared the means of the family process measures and examined the associations among these measures and with youth adjustments. The results from these urban samples in three different sociopolitical and economic contexts may reflect a complex interplay of culture and minority status in shaping the family process and its impact on youth development, illustrating how the modern Korean family process is flexible and responsive to local contexts. The findings of this study present useful instruments and warrant additional research on the antecedents, mechanisms, and implications of the family process to maximize youth potential in respective contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"254-273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419487/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-05DOI: 10.1037/dev0001978
Xinyin Chen, Jiaxi Zhou, Dan Li, Yan Li, Min Wu, Jingyao Wang
Researchers have been interested in exploring the distinguishing features of Chinese parenting and its role in child development, yet research in this area has been hindered by the limited availability of appropriate measures. Based on a perspective focusing on care-based power-assertive parenting (CBPAP) that explicitly emphasizes two integrated aspects of Chinese parenting, care and power assertion, parent- and child-report measures of CBPAP were developed and examined in the present study in samples with a rural background in China. Mothers of kindergarten children (N = 1,214; Mage = 54 months, 515 boys) completed the parent-report measure of CBPAP, and students in fourth grade in elementary schools (N = 714; Mage = 10 years, 385 boys) completed the child-report measure for maternal CBPAP and paternal CBPAP. Data on children's adjustment were collected from multiple sources. The results indicated a satisfactory fit of a one-factor model and internal consistency in the measures. Measurement invariance tests indicated the equivalence of the factor structure of the measures across gender and grades. Moreover, the CBPAP measures were positively associated with children's social and academic competence and negatively associated with children's behavioral problems. The study provided evidence for the psychometric properties of the measures and their meaningful relations with children's social, behavioral, and school adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Assessing care-based power-assertive parenting in Chinese families: Parent and child measures.","authors":"Xinyin Chen, Jiaxi Zhou, Dan Li, Yan Li, Min Wu, Jingyao Wang","doi":"10.1037/dev0001978","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001978","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers have been interested in exploring the distinguishing features of Chinese parenting and its role in child development, yet research in this area has been hindered by the limited availability of appropriate measures. Based on a perspective focusing on care-based power-assertive parenting (CBPAP) that explicitly emphasizes two integrated aspects of Chinese parenting, care and power assertion, parent- and child-report measures of CBPAP were developed and examined in the present study in samples with a rural background in China. Mothers of kindergarten children (<i>N</i> = 1,214; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 54 months, 515 boys) completed the parent-report measure of CBPAP, and students in fourth grade in elementary schools <i>(N</i> = 714; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 10 years, 385 boys) completed the child-report measure for maternal CBPAP and paternal CBPAP. Data on children's adjustment were collected from multiple sources. The results indicated a satisfactory fit of a one-factor model and internal consistency in the measures. Measurement invariance tests indicated the equivalence of the factor structure of the measures across gender and grades. Moreover, the CBPAP measures were positively associated with children's social and academic competence and negatively associated with children's behavioral problems. The study provided evidence for the psychometric properties of the measures and their meaningful relations with children's social, behavioral, and school adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"130-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144032515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-21DOI: 10.1037/dev0001941
Hanrie S Bezuidenhout, Anssi Vanhala, Kathleen Fonseca, Elizabeth Henning, Johan Korhonen, Pirjo Aunio
The aim of this study was to develop the Mathematics Vocabulary Test (MVT)-an instrument to identify young children with a limited mathematics vocabulary-in a multilingual majority country-South Africa. This study consists of two substudies with children aged 3-8.5 years (N = 988, ngirls = 429). In Study 1, a 26-item MVT was developed by multiprofessional expert panels and piloted in four languages, isiZulu (n = 229), Sesotho (n = 83), English (n = 89), and Afrikaans (n = 216). Study 1 provided evidence of content validity, and the MVT was further revised based on the results. In Study 2, additional samples were assessed with the revised version of the MVT in English (Stage 1, n = 270) and isiZulu (Stage 2, n = 101) to provide further evidence of reliability and validity for these two language versions of the test. Confirmatory factor analyses supported structural validity of a unidimensional structure, including 20 items in the English version and 16 items in the isiZulu version. The structure of the English MVT showed stability across time (T2 5 months after T1). Both versions showed good reliability in terms of internal consistency. Our findings also provided evidence of concurrent and known-group validity for both language versions, as well as predictive validity of the English version of the test. The English and isiZulu MVT can be used as a measure of mathematics vocabulary in educational practice and research with young children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Development of a Mathematics Vocabulary Test: Evidence of validity and reliability in a multilingual context.","authors":"Hanrie S Bezuidenhout, Anssi Vanhala, Kathleen Fonseca, Elizabeth Henning, Johan Korhonen, Pirjo Aunio","doi":"10.1037/dev0001941","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to develop the Mathematics Vocabulary Test (MVT)-an instrument to identify young children with a limited mathematics vocabulary-in a multilingual majority country-South Africa. This study consists of two substudies with children aged 3-8.5 years (<i>N</i> = 988, <i>n</i><sub>girls</sub> = 429). In Study 1, a 26-item MVT was developed by multiprofessional expert panels and piloted in four languages, isiZulu (<i>n</i> = 229), Sesotho (<i>n</i> = 83), English (<i>n</i> = 89), and Afrikaans (<i>n</i> = 216). Study 1 provided evidence of content validity, and the MVT was further revised based on the results. In Study 2, additional samples were assessed with the revised version of the MVT in English (Stage 1, <i>n</i> = 270) and isiZulu (Stage 2, <i>n</i> = 101) to provide further evidence of reliability and validity for these two language versions of the test. Confirmatory factor analyses supported structural validity of a unidimensional structure, including 20 items in the English version and 16 items in the isiZulu version. The structure of the English MVT showed stability across time (T2 5 months after T1). Both versions showed good reliability in terms of internal consistency. Our findings also provided evidence of concurrent and known-group validity for both language versions, as well as predictive validity of the English version of the test. The English and isiZulu MVT can be used as a measure of mathematics vocabulary in educational practice and research with young children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"157-175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144016973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1037/dev0002026
Jing Gong, Nirmala Rao
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal Target 4.2 underscores the importance of stimulating early learning experiences for child development. However, measuring home learning environments at the population level remains challenging. This study developed and validated a comprehensive and contextually appropriate measure of the home learning environment for children aged 3-5 years in China, the Chinese Home Learning Environment Scale. The study comprised two phases. In Phase I, an initial item pool was developed through a literature review, and expert consensus was established using a modified e-Delphi method. Items were refined based on pilot testing with 33 caregiver-child dyads. The Phase I version included 28 caregiver-reported items assessing learning resources and learning activity frequency and 16 directly observed items measuring the quality of learning activities. In Phase II, data from 777 relatively highly educated caregivers from middle-income families (Mage = 48.84 months; 46.72% boys; 49.94% urban residents) were used to evaluate items. Analyses yielded a four-factor model: Availability of Learning Resources (five items), Frequency of Basic Concept Learning (three items), Frequency of Formal Learning Activities (six items), and Frequency of Informal Learning Activities (13 items). The scale demonstrated good construct and concurrent validity and internal consistency. Higher socioeconomic status and urban residence were associated with higher Chinese Home Learning Environment Scale scores. The findings indicate that the scale is an effective tool for assessing Chinese children's home learning environments and can offer valuable insights for policy and intervention design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
联合国可持续发展目标具体目标4.2强调了激发早期学习经验对儿童发展的重要性。然而,在人口水平上衡量家庭学习环境仍然具有挑战性。本研究为中国3-5岁儿童的家庭学习环境开发并验证了一个全面的、适合情境的测量方法——中国家庭学习环境量表。这项研究包括两个阶段。在第一阶段,通过文献综述建立了一个初始项目池,并使用改进的e-Delphi方法建立了专家共识。根据对33名照顾者-儿童的二人组的初步测试,对项目进行了改进。第一阶段的版本包括28个由照顾者报告的评估学习资源和学习活动频率的项目,以及16个直接观察的衡量学习活动质量的项目。在第二阶段,来自中等收入家庭的777名受教育程度相对较高的护理人员的数据(年龄= 48.84个月;46.72%的男孩;49.94%城镇居民)为评价项目。分析产生了一个四因素模型:学习资源的可用性(5个项目)、基本概念学习的频率(3个项目)、正式学习活动的频率(6个项目)和非正式学习活动的频率(13个项目)。量表具有良好的构念性、并发效度和内部一致性。较高的社会经济地位和城市居住与较高的中国家庭学习环境量表得分相关。研究结果表明,该量表是评估中国儿童家庭学习环境的有效工具,可以为政策和干预设计提供有价值的见解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Development and validation of the Chinese Home Learning Environment Scale for preschool-aged children.","authors":"Jing Gong, Nirmala Rao","doi":"10.1037/dev0002026","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0002026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal Target 4.2 underscores the importance of stimulating early learning experiences for child development. However, measuring home learning environments at the population level remains challenging. This study developed and validated a comprehensive and contextually appropriate measure of the home learning environment for children aged 3-5 years in China, the <i>Chinese Home Learning Environment Scale</i>. The study comprised two phases. In Phase I, an initial item pool was developed through a literature review, and expert consensus was established using a modified e-Delphi method. Items were refined based on pilot testing with 33 caregiver-child dyads. The Phase I version included 28 caregiver-reported items assessing learning resources and learning activity frequency and 16 directly observed items measuring the quality of learning activities. In Phase II, data from 777 relatively highly educated caregivers from middle-income families (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 48.84 months; 46.72% boys; 49.94% urban residents) were used to evaluate items. Analyses yielded a four-factor model: Availability of Learning Resources (five items), Frequency of Basic Concept Learning (three items), Frequency of Formal Learning Activities (six items), and Frequency of Informal Learning Activities (13 items). The scale demonstrated good construct and concurrent validity and internal consistency. Higher socioeconomic status and urban residence were associated with higher Chinese Home Learning Environment Scale scores. The findings indicate that the scale is an effective tool for assessing Chinese children's home learning environments and can offer valuable insights for policy and intervention design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"274-287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144610009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-22DOI: 10.1037/dev0001988
Pei-Jung Yang, Pei-Chiang Lee, Meredith McGinley
This study investigated the construction of shortened Five Cs measures of positive youth development (PYD) for middle adolescents in the Taiwanese context. Based on a three-cohort sequential design, a total of 855 adolescents (55.6% Han and 44.4% Indigenous; mean ages were 12.98, 13.92, and 14.83, respectively, for the seventh-, eighth-, and ninth-grade data) were included. Respective Positive Youth Development-Short Form (PYD-SF) and Positive Youth Development-Very Short Form (PYD-VSF) Five Cs measures were constructed specifically for Han and Indigenous Taiwanese adolescents. The Five Cs bifactor structure was evident and appeared to be generally similar across grades for the PYD-SF during middle adolescence, whereas a Four Cs (Confidence, Connection, Character, Caring) structure emerged for the PYD-VSF for both Han and Indigenous groups. The exclusion of Competence in the VSF structure particularly highlights the specific scholastic context in Taiwan. The general PYD factor was associated with greater chances of helping behaviors and community involvement and fewer depressive symptoms for both groups in PYD-SF and PYD-VSF, supporting the validity of these forms and the use of the general PYD factor as an indicator for positive development for youth in the Majority World. Despite the limitations discussed, we believe our results may serve as an exemplar for the optimization of the measurement of PYD in today's diverse youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
摘要本研究旨在探讨台湾地区中青少年积极青少年发展之缩短5c量表之建构。基于三队列序贯设计,共有855名青少年(汉族55.6%,土著44.4%;七年级、八年级和九年级的平均年龄分别为12.98岁、13.92岁和14.83岁。本研究分别针对汉族青少年和台湾原住民青少年构建了积极青少年发展-短表(PYD-SF)和积极青少年发展-短表(PYD-VSF)五个c量表。在青少年中期,PYD-SF的五个c双因素结构是明显的,并且在不同年级之间似乎是相似的,而在汉族和土著群体的PYD-VSF中出现了四个c(信心、联系、性格、关怀)结构。在VSF结构中排除胜任能力,特别突出了台湾特定的学术背景。在PYD- sf和PYD- vsf两组中,一般PYD因子与更大的帮助行为和社区参与机会以及更少的抑郁症状相关,支持这些表格的有效性,并支持将一般PYD因子作为多数世界中青少年积极发展的指标。尽管讨论了局限性,但我们相信我们的结果可以作为当今多样化青年PYD测量优化的范例。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Construction of a Taiwanese (Han and Indigenous) version of Positive Youth Development Scale-Short and Very Short Forms.","authors":"Pei-Jung Yang, Pei-Chiang Lee, Meredith McGinley","doi":"10.1037/dev0001988","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001988","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the construction of shortened Five Cs measures of positive youth development (PYD) for middle adolescents in the Taiwanese context. Based on a three-cohort sequential design, a total of 855 adolescents (55.6% Han and 44.4% Indigenous; mean ages were 12.98, 13.92, and 14.83, respectively, for the seventh-, eighth-, and ninth-grade data) were included. Respective Positive Youth Development-Short Form (PYD-SF) and Positive Youth Development-Very Short Form (PYD-VSF) Five Cs measures were constructed specifically for Han and Indigenous Taiwanese adolescents. The Five Cs bifactor structure was evident and appeared to be generally similar across grades for the PYD-SF during middle adolescence, whereas a Four Cs (Confidence, Connection, Character, Caring) structure emerged for the PYD-VSF for both Han and Indigenous groups. The exclusion of Competence in the VSF structure particularly highlights the specific scholastic context in Taiwan. The general PYD factor was associated with greater chances of helping behaviors and community involvement and fewer depressive symptoms for both groups in PYD-SF and PYD-VSF, supporting the validity of these forms and the use of the general PYD factor as an indicator for positive development for youth in the Majority World. Despite the limitations discussed, we believe our results may serve as an exemplar for the optimization of the measurement of PYD in today's diverse youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144128489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1037/dev0001899
Taja Francis, Marsha Bowers, Helen Baker-Henningham
Violence against children is a global public health issue that can lead to long-lasting negative consequences for child outcomes. The Irie Homes Toolbox (IHT) is an early childhood, violence prevention, parenting program designed for integration into early childhood educational services in Jamaica. We have previously shown that the program is effective in reducing child maltreatment when implemented by the research team. For wide-scale dissemination, the IHT needs to be delivered by preschool staff as part of their routine duties. We adapted the IHT using results from our previous evaluations, and we are conducting a mixed-method feasibility trial of the IHT fully integrated into preschool provision. Twenty-four basic schools in Kingston and St. Andrew, Jamaica, have been randomly assigned to intervention (n = 12) or wait-list control (n = 12) with 10 caregivers per school participating in the study (240 caregivers, 120/group). The intervention is delivered through 12 weekly, 1-hr sessions by a preschool teacher with groups of 10 caregivers of children aged 2-6 years. An ongoing process evaluation includes quantitative measures of caregiver attendance, teacher compliance, and fidelity of intervention implementation and qualitative measures of enablers and barriers to implementation and suggestions for improvement. In the impact evaluation, the primary outcome is the frequency of caregivers' use of violence against their child. Secondary outcomes are caregiver attitudes to violence, preferences for harsh punishment, involvement with their child, and child conduct problems. All outcomes are measured through caregiver report. The results of the study will be used to inform revisions of the IHT for implementation at scale. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
暴力侵害儿童行为是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,可能对儿童结局造成长期的负面影响。Irie家庭工具箱(IHT)是一项旨在融入牙买加早期儿童教育服务的儿童早期暴力预防和养育方案。我们之前已经证明,当研究团队实施该计划时,该计划在减少儿童虐待方面是有效的。为了大规模传播,学前教育工作者需要将IHT作为其日常职责的一部分来提供。我们根据之前的评估结果调整了IHT,我们正在进行一项将IHT完全融入学前教育的混合方法可行性试验。牙买加金斯顿和圣安德鲁的24所基础学校被随机分配到干预组(n = 12)或等候名单对照组(n = 12),每所学校有10名护理人员参与这项研究(240名护理人员,120名/组)。干预是通过每周12次,每次1小时的课程进行的,由一名幼儿园老师和10名2-6岁儿童的照顾者组成。正在进行的过程评估包括护理人员出勤、教师依从性和干预实施的保真度的定量测量,以及实施的促成因素和障碍以及改进建议的定性测量。在影响评估中,主要结果是看护者对其儿童使用暴力的频率。次要结果是照顾者对暴力的态度、对严厉惩罚的偏好、与孩子的参与以及儿童行为问题。所有结果均通过护理人员报告进行测量。这项研究的结果将用于为大规模实施的国际卫生标准的修订提供信息。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A feasibility trial of an early childhood, violence prevention, parenting program integrated into early childhood educational provision in Jamaica: A study protocol.","authors":"Taja Francis, Marsha Bowers, Helen Baker-Henningham","doi":"10.1037/dev0001899","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0001899","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Violence against children is a global public health issue that can lead to long-lasting negative consequences for child outcomes. The Irie Homes Toolbox (IHT) is an early childhood, violence prevention, parenting program designed for integration into early childhood educational services in Jamaica. We have previously shown that the program is effective in reducing child maltreatment when implemented by the research team. For wide-scale dissemination, the IHT needs to be delivered by preschool staff as part of their routine duties. We adapted the IHT using results from our previous evaluations, and we are conducting a mixed-method feasibility trial of the IHT fully integrated into preschool provision. Twenty-four basic schools in Kingston and St. Andrew, Jamaica, have been randomly assigned to intervention (<i>n</i> = 12) or wait-list control (<i>n</i> = 12) with 10 caregivers per school participating in the study (240 caregivers, 120/group). The intervention is delivered through 12 weekly, 1-hr sessions by a preschool teacher with groups of 10 caregivers of children aged 2-6 years. An ongoing process evaluation includes quantitative measures of caregiver attendance, teacher compliance, and fidelity of intervention implementation and qualitative measures of enablers and barriers to implementation and suggestions for improvement. In the impact evaluation, the primary outcome is the frequency of caregivers' use of violence against their child. Secondary outcomes are caregiver attitudes to violence, preferences for harsh punishment, involvement with their child, and child conduct problems. All outcomes are measured through caregiver report. The results of the study will be used to inform revisions of the IHT for implementation at scale. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"116-129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This special issue aimed to help address the bias against Majority World countries in published methodological research in the field of developmental psychology. The 21 articles included in this issue present a diverse range of methodological articles from over 20 Majority World countries. This introductory article presents an overview of these articles, as well as the rationale for this special issue, and insights from the submission, review, and publication process. We have also collected some feedback from contributing authors, which provides insights into the experiences of the review and publication process for a special issue aimed at platforming research from Majority World countries. Finally, we make recommendations for the field of developmental psychology and child development more generally on future directions to advance methodological research in Majority World countries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Majority country methods for developmental psychology: Evidence and insights from diverse global settings.","authors":"Catherine E Draper, Sebastian Lipina, Qing Zhou","doi":"10.1037/dev0002075","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0002075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This special issue aimed to help address the bias against Majority World countries in published methodological research in the field of developmental psychology. The 21 articles included in this issue present a diverse range of methodological articles from over 20 Majority World countries. This introductory article presents an overview of these articles, as well as the rationale for this special issue, and insights from the submission, review, and publication process. We have also collected some feedback from contributing authors, which provides insights into the experiences of the review and publication process for a special issue aimed at platforming research from Majority World countries. Finally, we make recommendations for the field of developmental psychology and child development more generally on future directions to advance methodological research in Majority World countries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":"62 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12778957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145906802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-28DOI: 10.1037/dev0002044
Melody Ndzenyuiy, Katja Liebal, Roman Stengelin, Thomas Stodulka, Daniel B M Haun
Parenting behaviors are studied through various qualitative and quantitative methods, including observations, interviews, and questionnaires, to identify both culturally specific and universal patterns of parents' interactions with their offspring. However, these methods have rarely been combined to systematically investigate methodological convergence and divergence in capturing parenting dynamics. The present study employs a mixed method approach by including video observations, picture card interviews, and parenting ethnotheory questionnaires with a focus on a suburban Nso community in Cameroon, with 51 parents (Mage = 34 years; 43 mothers and eight fathers) of infants and toddlers (Mage = 8.2 months). Informed by Keller's Component Model of Parenting, videos and interviews were coded for target parenting behaviors, including primary care, body contact, body stimulation, face-to-face context, object stimulation, and vocalization. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the parenting ethnotheory questionnaire items, alongside correlational analysis, to examine links between the three methods. Findings indicated minimal methodological convergence and ample divergence, suggesting that each method taps into distinct aspects of parenting without a unified representation. Within-method analyses, nonetheless, showed substantial correlations, particularly within observation and picture card interview methodologies. These findings are broadly consistent with the Component Model of Parenting but highlight the need for methodological diversity to capture the rich variation of parenting practices employed among cultural communities that are underrepresented in mainstream developmental research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
通过观察、访谈和问卷调查等多种定性和定量方法研究父母行为,以确定父母与子女互动的文化特定模式和普遍模式。然而,这些方法很少结合起来系统地调查方法的趋同和分歧,以捕捉育儿动态。本研究采用混合方法,包括视频观察,图片卡访谈和育儿民族理论问卷调查,重点关注喀麦隆郊区Nso社区,51名父母(年龄34岁;43名母亲和8名父亲)的婴儿和幼儿(年龄8.2个月)。根据凯勒的育儿成分模型,视频和访谈被编码为目标育儿行为,包括初级保健、身体接触、身体刺激、面对面的环境、对象刺激和发声。对养育民族理论问卷项目进行了探索性因素分析,并进行了相关分析,以检验三种方法之间的联系。研究结果表明,方法上的趋同最小,分歧很大,这表明每种方法都触及了养育子女的不同方面,而没有统一的表现。然而,方法内分析显示了实质性的相关性,特别是在观察和图片卡访谈方法中。这些发现与育儿成分模型大体一致,但强调了方法多样性的必要性,以捕捉主流发展研究中代表性不足的文化社区所采用的养育实践的丰富变化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Parenting culture: A multimethod perspective on parenting practices among the Nso, Cameroon.","authors":"Melody Ndzenyuiy, Katja Liebal, Roman Stengelin, Thomas Stodulka, Daniel B M Haun","doi":"10.1037/dev0002044","DOIUrl":"10.1037/dev0002044","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parenting behaviors are studied through various qualitative and quantitative methods, including observations, interviews, and questionnaires, to identify both culturally specific and universal patterns of parents' interactions with their offspring. However, these methods have rarely been combined to systematically investigate methodological convergence and divergence in capturing parenting dynamics. The present study employs a mixed method approach by including video observations, picture card interviews, and parenting ethnotheory questionnaires with a focus on a suburban Nso community in Cameroon, with 51 parents (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34 years; 43 mothers and eight fathers) of infants and toddlers (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 8.2 months). Informed by Keller's Component Model of Parenting, videos and interviews were coded for target parenting behaviors, including primary care, body contact, body stimulation, face-to-face context, object stimulation, and vocalization. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the parenting ethnotheory questionnaire items, alongside correlational analysis, to examine links between the three methods. Findings indicated minimal methodological convergence and ample divergence, suggesting that each method taps into distinct aspects of parenting without a unified representation. Within-method analyses, nonetheless, showed substantial correlations, particularly within observation and picture card interview methodologies. These findings are broadly consistent with the Component Model of Parenting but highlight the need for methodological diversity to capture the rich variation of parenting practices employed among cultural communities that are underrepresented in mainstream developmental research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"65-75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144974483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}