首页 > 最新文献

Lancet Digital Health最新文献

英文 中文
Virtual pregnancies: predicting and preventing pregnancy complications with digital twins 虚拟怀孕:预测和预防数字双胞胎妊娠并发症
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00086-4
Adrienne K Scott , Michelle L Oyen
{"title":"Virtual pregnancies: predicting and preventing pregnancy complications with digital twins","authors":"Adrienne K Scott , Michelle L Oyen","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00086-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00086-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000864/pdfft?md5=4c537f02b6a0b5de364d1829924f9aa5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000864-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141429102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6: e33–43 Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6: e33-43 更正
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00121-3
{"title":"Correction to Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6: e33–43","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00121-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00121-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001213/pdfft?md5=73e788169a1247c34b3f5649a47fbc2d&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024001213-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Automated cooling tower detection through deep learning for Legionnaires’ disease outbreak investigations: a model development and validation study 通过深度学习自动检测冷却塔,用于军团病爆发调查:模型开发与验证研究
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00094-3
Karen K Wong MD , Thaddeus Segura MIDS , Gunnar Mein MIDS , Jia Lu PhD , Elizabeth J Hannapel MPH , Jasen M Kunz MPH , Troy Ritter PhD , Jessica C Smith MPH , Alberto Todeschini PhD , Fred Nugen PhD , Chris Edens PhD

Background

Cooling towers containing Legionella spp are a high-risk source of Legionnaires’ disease outbreaks. Manually locating cooling towers from aerial imagery during outbreak investigations requires expertise, is labour intensive, and can be prone to errors. We aimed to train a deep learning computer vision model to automatically detect cooling towers that are aerially visible.

Methods

Between Jan 1 and 31, 2021, we extracted satellite view images of Philadelphia (PN, USA) and New York state (NY, USA) from Google Maps and annotated cooling towers to create training datasets. We augmented training data with synthetic data and model-assisted labelling of additional cities. Using 2051 images containing 7292 cooling towers, we trained a two-stage model using YOLOv5, a model that detects objects in images, and EfficientNet-b5, a model that classifies images. We assessed the primary outcomes of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the model against manual labelling on test datasets of 548 images, including from two cities not seen in training (Boston [MA, USA] and Athens [GA, USA]). We compared the search speed of the model with that of manual searching by four epidemiologists.

Findings

The model identified visible cooling towers with 95·1% sensitivity (95% CI 94·0–96·1) and a PPV of 90·1% (95% CI 90·0–90·2) in New York City and Philadelphia. In Boston, sensitivity was 91·6% (89·2–93·7) and PPV was 80·8% (80·5–81·2). In Athens, sensitivity was 86·9% (75·8–94·2) and PPV was 85·5% (84·2–86·7). For an area of New York City encompassing 45 blocks (0·26 square miles), the model searched more than 600 times faster (7·6 s; 351 potential cooling towers identified) than did human investigators (mean 83·75 min [SD 29·5]; mean 310·8 cooling towers [42·2]).

Interpretation

The model could be used to accelerate investigation and source control during outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease through the identification of cooling towers from aerial imagery, potentially preventing additional disease spread. The model has already been used by public health teams for outbreak investigations and to initialise cooling tower registries, which are considered best practice for preventing and responding to outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease.

Funding

None.

背景含有军团菌的冷却塔是军团病爆发的高危来源。在疫情调查期间,从航空图像中手动定位冷却塔需要专业技术,耗费大量人力,而且容易出错。我们的目标是训练一个深度学习计算机视觉模型,以自动检测空中可见的冷却塔。方法在 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 31 日期间,我们从谷歌地图中提取了费城(PN,美国)和纽约州(NY,美国)的卫星视图图像,并标注了冷却塔,以创建训练数据集。我们使用合成数据和模型辅助标注的其他城市来扩充训练数据。我们使用包含 7292 座冷却塔的 2051 幅图像,使用 YOLOv5(一种检测图像中物体的模型)和 EfficientNet-b5 (一种对图像进行分类的模型)训练了一个两阶段模型。我们在包含 548 张图片的测试数据集上评估了该模型与人工标注相比的灵敏度和阳性预测值 (PPV),其中包括两个在训练中未曾出现过的城市(波士顿[美国马萨诸塞州]和雅典[美国佐治亚州])。在纽约市和费城,该模型识别可见冷却塔的灵敏度为 95-1%(95% CI 94-0-96-1),PPV 为 90-1%(95% CI 90-0-90-2)。在波士顿,灵敏度为 91-6%(89-2-93-7),PPV 为 80-8%(80-5-81-2)。在雅典,灵敏度为 86-9%(75-8-94-2),PPV 为 85-5%(84-2-86-7)。在纽约市 45 个街区(0-26 平方英里)的区域内,该模型的搜索速度(7-6 秒;识别出 351 个潜在冷却塔)比人类调查人员(平均 83-75 分钟 [SD 29-5];平均 310-8 个冷却塔 [42-2])快 600 多倍。该模型已被公共卫生团队用于疫情调查和冷却塔登记初始化,这被认为是预防和应对军团病爆发的最佳做法。
{"title":"Automated cooling tower detection through deep learning for Legionnaires’ disease outbreak investigations: a model development and validation study","authors":"Karen K Wong MD ,&nbsp;Thaddeus Segura MIDS ,&nbsp;Gunnar Mein MIDS ,&nbsp;Jia Lu PhD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J Hannapel MPH ,&nbsp;Jasen M Kunz MPH ,&nbsp;Troy Ritter PhD ,&nbsp;Jessica C Smith MPH ,&nbsp;Alberto Todeschini PhD ,&nbsp;Fred Nugen PhD ,&nbsp;Chris Edens PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00094-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00094-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cooling towers containing <em>Legionella</em> spp are a high-risk source of Legionnaires’ disease outbreaks. Manually locating cooling towers from aerial imagery during outbreak investigations requires expertise, is labour intensive, and can be prone to errors. We aimed to train a deep learning computer vision model to automatically detect cooling towers that are aerially visible.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between Jan 1 and 31, 2021, we extracted satellite view images of Philadelphia (PN, USA) and New York state (NY, USA) from Google Maps and annotated cooling towers to create training datasets. We augmented training data with synthetic data and model-assisted labelling of additional cities. Using 2051 images containing 7292 cooling towers, we trained a two-stage model using YOLOv5, a model that detects objects in images, and EfficientNet-b5, a model that classifies images. We assessed the primary outcomes of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the model against manual labelling on test datasets of 548 images, including from two cities not seen in training (Boston [MA, USA] and Athens [GA, USA]). We compared the search speed of the model with that of manual searching by four epidemiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The model identified visible cooling towers with 95·1% sensitivity (95% CI 94·0–96·1) and a PPV of 90·1% (95% CI 90·0–90·2) in New York City and Philadelphia. In Boston, sensitivity was 91·6% (89·2–93·7) and PPV was 80·8% (80·5–81·2). In Athens, sensitivity was 86·9% (75·8–94·2) and PPV was 85·5% (84·2–86·7). For an area of New York City encompassing 45 blocks (0·26 square miles), the model searched more than 600 times faster (7·6 s; 351 potential cooling towers identified) than did human investigators (mean 83·75 min [SD 29·5]; mean 310·8 cooling towers [42·2]).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The model could be used to accelerate investigation and source control during outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease through the identification of cooling towers from aerial imagery, potentially preventing additional disease spread. The model has already been used by public health teams for outbreak investigations and to initialise cooling tower registries, which are considered best practice for preventing and responding to outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000943/pdfft?md5=134e7afec7443d66f0fb73e4c1e6aabb&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000943-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
External validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction: a multicentre cohort study 用于早期诊断心肌梗死的心肌缺血损伤指数机器学习算法的外部验证:一项多中心队列研究
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00088-8
Pedro Lopez-Ayala MD , Jasper Boeddinghaus MD , Thomas Nestelberger MD , Luca Koechlin MD , Tobias Zimmermann MD , Paolo Bima MD , Jonas Glaeser MD , Carlos C Spagnuolo MD , Arnaud Champetier MSc , Oscar Miro MD PhD , Francisco Javier Martin-Sanchez MD PhD , Dagmar I Keller MD , Michael Christ MD , Karin Wildi MD PhD , Tobias Breidthardt MD , Ivo Strebel PhD , Prof Christian Mueller MD

Background

The myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index (MI3) is a novel machine learning algorithm for the early diagnosis of type 1 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The performance of MI3, both when using early serial blood draws (eg, at 1 h or 2 h) and in direct comparison with guideline-recommended algorithms, remains unknown. Our aim was to externally validate MI3 and compare its performance with that of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1h-algorithm.

Methods

In this secondary analysis of a multicentre international diagnostic cohort study, adult patients (age >18 years) presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction were prospectively enrolled from April 21, 2006, to Feb 27, 2019 in 12 centres from five European countries (Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Poland, and Czech Republic). Patients were excluded if they presented with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, did not have at least two serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) measurements, or if the final diagnosis remained unclear. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available medical records, including serial hs-cTnI measurements and cardiac imaging. The primary outcome was type 1 NSTEMI. The performance of MI3 was directly compared with that of the ESC 0/1h-algorithm.

Findings

Among 6487 patients, (median age 61·0 years [IQR 49·0–73·0]; 2122 [33%] female and 4365 [67%] male), 882 (13·6%) patients had type 1 NSTEMI. The median time difference between the first and second hs-cTnI measurement was 60·0 mins (IQR 57·0–70·0). MI3 performance was very good, with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0·961 (95% CI 0·957 to 0·965) and a good overall calibration (intercept –0·09 [–0·2 to 0·02]; slope 1·02 [0·97 to 1·08]). The originally defined MI3 score of less than 1·6 identified 4186 (64·5%) patients as low probability of having a type 1 NSTEMI (sensitivity 99·1% [95% CI 98·2 to 99·5]; negative predictive value [NPV] 99·8% [95% CI 99·6 to 99·9]) and an MI3 score of 49·7 or more identified 915 (14·1%) patients as high probability of having a type 1 NSTEMI (specificity 95·0% [94·3 to 95·5]; positive predictive value [PPV] 69·1% [66·0–72·0]). The sensitivity and NPV of the ESC 0/1h-algorithm were higher than that of MI3 (difference for sensitivity 0·88% [0·19 to 1·60], p=0·0082; difference for NPV 0·18% [0·05 to 0·32], p=0·016), and the rule-out efficacy was higher for MI3 (11% difference, p<0·0001). Specificity and PPV for MI3 were superior (difference for specificity 3·80% [3·24 to 4·36], p<0·0001; difference for PPV 7·84% [5·86 to 9·97], p<0·0001), and the rule-in efficacy was higher for the ESC 0/1h-algorithm (5·4% difference, p<0·0001).

背景心肌缺血损伤指数(MI3)是一种新型机器学习算法,用于早期诊断 1 型非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)。MI3在使用早期连续抽血(如1小时或2小时)以及与指南推荐算法直接比较时的性能仍然未知。在这项多中心国际诊断队列研究的二次分析中,2006 年 4 月 21 日至 2019 年 2 月 27 日期间,来自五个欧洲国家(瑞士、西班牙、意大利、波兰和捷克共和国)的 12 个中心对因症状提示心肌梗死而到急诊科就诊的成年患者(年龄为 18 岁)进行了前瞻性登记。如果患者表现为ST段抬高型心肌梗死、没有至少两次连续的高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I(hs-cTnI)测量结果或最终诊断仍不明确,则将其排除在外。最终诊断由两名独立的心脏病专家利用所有可用的医疗记录(包括连续的 hs-cTnI 测量和心脏成像)进行集中裁定。主要结果是 1 型 NSTEMI。6487名患者(中位年龄61-0岁[IQR 49-0-73-0];女性2122人[33%],男性4365人[67%])中,882人(13-6%)为1型NSTEMI。第一次和第二次 hs-cTnI 测量之间的中位时间差为 60-0 分钟(IQR 57-0-70-0)。MI3 的性能非常好,接收者操作特征曲线下的面积为 0-961(95% CI 0-957 至 0-965),总体校准效果良好(截距 -0-09 [-0-2 至 0-02];斜率 1-02 [0-97 至 1-08])。最初定义的 MI3 评分小于 1-6 的 4186 例(64-5%)患者被确定为 1 型 NSTEMI 的可能性较低(灵敏度 99-1% [95% CI 98-2 至 99-5];阴性预测值[NPV] 99-8% [95% CI 99-6 to 99-9]),而 MI3 评分为 49-7 分或以上的 915 例(14-1%)患者被确定为 1 型 NSTEMI 的可能性较高(特异性 95-0% [94-3 to 95-5];阳性预测值[PPV] 69-1% [66-0-72-0])。ESC 0/1h 算法的灵敏度和 NPV 均高于 MI3 算法(灵敏度差值为 0-88% [0-19 至 1-60],p=0-0082;NPV 差值为 0-18% [0-05 至 0-32],p=0-016),而 MI3 算法的排除效力更高(差值为 11%,p<0-0001)。MI3 的特异性和 PPV 更优(特异性相差 3-80% [3-24 至 4-36],p<0-0001;PPV 相差 7-84% [5-86 至 9-97],p<0-0001),ESC 0/1h 算法的排除效力更高(相差 5-4%,p<0-0001)。解释MI3在诊断1型NSTEMI方面表现非常出色,在急诊科使用早期连续抽血时,与ESC 0/1h-算法具有可比性。
{"title":"External validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction: a multicentre cohort study","authors":"Pedro Lopez-Ayala MD ,&nbsp;Jasper Boeddinghaus MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Nestelberger MD ,&nbsp;Luca Koechlin MD ,&nbsp;Tobias Zimmermann MD ,&nbsp;Paolo Bima MD ,&nbsp;Jonas Glaeser MD ,&nbsp;Carlos C Spagnuolo MD ,&nbsp;Arnaud Champetier MSc ,&nbsp;Oscar Miro MD PhD ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Martin-Sanchez MD PhD ,&nbsp;Dagmar I Keller MD ,&nbsp;Michael Christ MD ,&nbsp;Karin Wildi MD PhD ,&nbsp;Tobias Breidthardt MD ,&nbsp;Ivo Strebel PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Christian Mueller MD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00088-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00088-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index (MI<sup>3</sup>) is a novel machine learning algorithm for the early diagnosis of type 1 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The performance of MI<sup>3</sup>, both when using early serial blood draws (eg, at 1 h or 2 h) and in direct comparison with guideline-recommended algorithms, remains unknown. Our aim was to externally validate MI<sup>3</sup> and compare its performance with that of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1h-algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this secondary analysis of a multicentre international diagnostic cohort study, adult patients (age &gt;18 years) presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction were prospectively enrolled from April 21, 2006, to Feb 27, 2019 in 12 centres from five European countries (Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Poland, and Czech Republic). Patients were excluded if they presented with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, did not have at least two serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) measurements, or if the final diagnosis remained unclear. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available medical records, including serial hs-cTnI measurements and cardiac imaging. The primary outcome was type 1 NSTEMI. The performance of MI<sup>3</sup> was directly compared with that of the ESC 0/1h-algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Among 6487 patients, (median age 61·0 years [IQR 49·0–73·0]; 2122 [33%] female and 4365 [67%] male), 882 (13·6%) patients had type 1 NSTEMI. The median time difference between the first and second hs-cTnI measurement was 60·0 mins (IQR 57·0–70·0). MI<sup>3</sup> performance was very good, with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0·961 (95% CI 0·957 to 0·965) and a good overall calibration (intercept –0·09 [–0·2 to 0·02]; slope 1·02 [0·97 to 1·08]). The originally defined MI<sup>3</sup> score of less than 1·6 identified 4186 (64·5%) patients as low probability of having a type 1 NSTEMI (sensitivity 99·1% [95% CI 98·2 to 99·5]; negative predictive value [NPV] 99·8% [95% CI 99·6 to 99·9]) and an MI<sup>3</sup> score of 49·7 or more identified 915 (14·1%) patients as high probability of having a type 1 NSTEMI (specificity 95·0% [94·3 to 95·5]; positive predictive value [PPV] 69·1% [66·0–72·0]). The sensitivity and NPV of the ESC 0/1h-algorithm were higher than that of MI<sup>3</sup> (difference for sensitivity 0·88% [0·19 to 1·60], p=0·0082; difference for NPV 0·18% [0·05 to 0·32], p=0·016), and the rule-out efficacy was higher for MI<sup>3</sup> (11% difference, p&lt;0·0001). Specificity and PPV for MI<sup>3</sup> were superior (difference for specificity 3·80% [3·24 to 4·36], p&lt;0·0001; difference for PPV 7·84% [5·86 to 9·97], p&lt;0·0001), and the rule-in efficacy was higher for the ESC 0/1h-algorithm (5·4% difference, p&lt;0·0001).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000888/pdfft?md5=4687bfa0693df8237a23349722a85e46&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000888-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction risk assessment with artificial intelligence-based algorithms 利用基于人工智能的算法推进非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死风险评估
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00117-1
Sorayya Malek , Sazzli Kasim
{"title":"Advancing non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction risk assessment with artificial intelligence-based algorithms","authors":"Sorayya Malek ,&nbsp;Sazzli Kasim","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00117-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00117-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001171/pdfft?md5=34068be67c23395838e475f15d231b3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024001171-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141429101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A response to evaluating national data flows 对评估国家数据流的回应
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00100-6
Grace B Hatton , Christie Brooks
{"title":"A response to evaluating national data flows","authors":"Grace B Hatton ,&nbsp;Christie Brooks","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00100-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00100-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001006/pdfft?md5=71db10e05782e151870bf4bed71961b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024001006-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The lofty heights of digital health 数字医疗的崇高目标
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00122-5
The Lancet Digital Health
{"title":"The lofty heights of digital health","authors":"The Lancet Digital Health","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00122-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00122-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001225/pdfft?md5=0f5b1d023170bc6a9b888b87db25ca61&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024001225-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The efficacy of automated feedback after internet-based depression screening (DISCOVER): an observer-masked, three-armed, randomised controlled trial in Germany 基于互联网的抑郁筛查(DISCOVER)后自动反馈的疗效:在德国进行的观察者掩蔽、三臂随机对照试验
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00070-0
Prof Sebastian Kohlmann PhD , Franziska Sikorski MSc , Prof Hans-Helmut König MD , Marion Schütt MSc , Prof Antonia Zapf PhD , Prof Bernd Löwe MD

Background

Despite the availability of effective treatments, most depressive disorders remain undetected and untreated. Internet-based depression screening combined with automated feedback of screening results could reach people with depression and lead to evidence-based care. We aimed to test the efficacy of two versions of automated feedback after internet-based screening on depression severity compared with no feedback.

Methods

DISCOVER was an observer-masked, three-armed, randomised controlled trial in Germany. We recruited individuals (aged ≥18 years) who were undiagnosed with depression and screened positive for depression on an internet-based self-report depression rating scale (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] ≥10 points). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to automatically receive no feedback, non-tailored feedback, or tailored feedback on the depression screening result. Randomisation was stratified by depression severity (moderate: PHQ-9 score 10–14 points; severe: PHQ-9 score ≥15 points). Participants could not be masked but were kept unaware of trial hypotheses to minimise expectancy bias. The non-tailored feedback included the depression screening result, a recommendation to seek professional diagnostic advice, and brief general information about depression and its treatment. The tailored feedback included the same basic information but individually framed according to the participants’ symptom profiles, treatment preferences, causal symptom attributions, health insurance, and local residence. Research staff were masked to group allocation and outcome assessment as these were done using online questionnaires. The primary outcome was change in depression severity, defined as change in PHQ-9 score 6 months after random assignment. Analyses were conducted following the intention-to-treat principle for participants with at least one follow-up visit. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04633096.

Findings

Between Jan 12, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 4878 individuals completed the internet-based screening. Of these, 1178 (24%) screened positive for depression (mean age 37·1 [SD 14·2] years; 824 [70%] woman, 344 [29%] men, and 10 [1%] other gender identity). 6 months after random assignment, depression severity decreased by 3·4 PHQ-9 points in the no feedback group (95% CI 2·9–4·0; within-group d 0·67; 325 participants), by 3·5 points in the non-tailored feedback group (3·0–4·0; within-group d 0·74; 319 participants), and by 3·7 points in the tailored feedback group (3·2–4·3; within-group d 0·71; 321 participants), with no significant differences among the three groups (p=0·72). The number of participants seeking help for depression or initiating psychotherapy or antidepressant treatment did not differ among study groups. The results remained consistent when adjusted for fulfilli

背景尽管已经有了有效的治疗方法,但大多数抑郁症仍未被发现和治疗。基于互联网的抑郁症筛查与筛查结果的自动反馈相结合,可以帮助抑郁症患者并提供循证治疗。我们的目的是测试两种版本的自动反馈在基于互联网的筛查后对抑郁症严重程度的影响,并与无反馈进行比较。方法DISCOVER 是一项在德国进行的观察者掩蔽、三臂随机对照试验。我们招募了未确诊为抑郁症的个人(年龄≥18 岁),他们在基于互联网的自我报告抑郁评分量表(患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9] ≥10分)中被筛查出患有抑郁症。参与者按 1:1:1 的比例被随机分配到自动接受无反馈、非定制反馈或针对抑郁筛查结果的定制反馈。随机分配按抑郁严重程度分层(中度:PHQ-9 评分 10-14 分;重度:PHQ-9 评分≥15 分)。参与者不能被蒙蔽,但不知道试验假设,以尽量减少预期偏差。非定制反馈包括抑郁症筛查结果、寻求专业诊断建议以及有关抑郁症及其治疗的简要一般信息。定制反馈包括相同的基本信息,但根据参与者的症状特征、治疗偏好、症状成因归因、医疗保险和当地居住地进行了个性化设置。研究人员对组别分配和结果评估进行了保密,因为这些都是通过在线问卷进行的。主要结果是抑郁严重程度的变化,即随机分配 6 个月后 PHQ-9 评分的变化。对至少进行过一次随访的参与者按照意向治疗原则进行分析。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT04633096。研究结果在 2021 年 1 月 12 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日期间,共有 4878 人完成了基于互联网的筛查。其中,1178 人(24%)筛查出抑郁症阳性(平均年龄 37-1 [SD 14-2] 岁;824 [70%] 名女性,344 [29%] 名男性,10 [1%] 名其他性别认同者)。随机分配 6 个月后,无反馈组的抑郁严重程度下降了 PHQ-9 3-4 分(95% CI 2-9-4-0;组内 d 0-67;325 名参与者),非定制反馈组下降了 3-5 分(3-0-4-0;组内 d 0-74;319 名参与者),定制反馈组下降了 3-7 分(3-2-4-3;组内 d 0-71;321 名参与者),三组之间无显著差异(P=0-72)。各研究组中,因抑郁而寻求帮助或开始心理治疗或抗抑郁治疗的人数没有差异。根据符合基于 DSM-5 的重度抑郁障碍标准或主观认为患有抑郁障碍的情况进行调整后,结果仍然一致。在随机分配后的 6 个月中,只有不到 1%的样本报告了负面影响。解释基于互联网的抑郁症筛查后的自动反馈并没有降低抑郁症的严重程度,也没有促使之前未被诊断出患有抑郁症但受到抑郁症影响的人接受足够的抑郁症治疗。
{"title":"The efficacy of automated feedback after internet-based depression screening (DISCOVER): an observer-masked, three-armed, randomised controlled trial in Germany","authors":"Prof Sebastian Kohlmann PhD ,&nbsp;Franziska Sikorski MSc ,&nbsp;Prof Hans-Helmut König MD ,&nbsp;Marion Schütt MSc ,&nbsp;Prof Antonia Zapf PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Bernd Löwe MD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00070-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00070-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the availability of effective treatments, most depressive disorders remain undetected and untreated. Internet-based depression screening combined with automated feedback of screening results could reach people with depression and lead to evidence-based care. We aimed to test the efficacy of two versions of automated feedback after internet-based screening on depression severity compared with no feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>DISCOVER was an observer-masked, three-armed, randomised controlled trial in Germany. We recruited individuals (aged ≥18 years) who were undiagnosed with depression and screened positive for depression on an internet-based self-report depression rating scale (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] ≥10 points). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to automatically receive no feedback, non-tailored feedback, or tailored feedback on the depression screening result. Randomisation was stratified by depression severity (moderate: PHQ-9 score 10–14 points; severe: PHQ-9 score ≥15 points). Participants could not be masked but were kept unaware of trial hypotheses to minimise expectancy bias. The non-tailored feedback included the depression screening result, a recommendation to seek professional diagnostic advice, and brief general information about depression and its treatment. The tailored feedback included the same basic information but individually framed according to the participants’ symptom profiles, treatment preferences, causal symptom attributions, health insurance, and local residence. Research staff were masked to group allocation and outcome assessment as these were done using online questionnaires. The primary outcome was change in depression severity, defined as change in PHQ-9 score 6 months after random assignment. Analyses were conducted following the intention-to-treat principle for participants with at least one follow-up visit. This trial was registered at <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>, <span>NCT04633096</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Jan 12, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 4878 individuals completed the internet-based screening. Of these, 1178 (24%) screened positive for depression (mean age 37·1 [SD 14·2] years; 824 [70%] woman, 344 [29%] men, and 10 [1%] other gender identity). 6 months after random assignment, depression severity decreased by 3·4 PHQ-9 points in the no feedback group (95% CI 2·9–4·0; within-group d 0·67; 325 participants), by 3·5 points in the non-tailored feedback group (3·0–4·0; within-group d 0·74; 319 participants), and by 3·7 points in the tailored feedback group (3·2–4·3; within-group d 0·71; 321 participants), with no significant differences among the three groups (p=0·72). The number of participants seeking help for depression or initiating psychotherapy or antidepressant treatment did not differ among study groups. The results remained consistent when adjusted for fulfilli","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000700/pdfft?md5=339cfa330e95efe94536fa8c159d0a77&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000700-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deep learning models for thyroid nodules diagnosis of fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a retrospective, prospective, multicentre study in China 用于甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检诊断的深度学习模型:一项在中国开展的回顾性、前瞻性多中心研究。
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00085-2
Jue Wang MS , Nafen Zheng BSc , Huan Wan BSc , Qinyue Yao MS , Shijun Jia MS , Xin Zhang MS , Sha Fu MD , Jingliang Ruan MD , Gui He BSc , Xulin Chen MS , Suiping Li MS , Rui Chen BSc , Boan Lai BSc , Jin Wang PhD , Prof Qingping Jiang MD , Prof Nengtai Ouyang MD , Yin Zhang PhD

Background

Accurately distinguishing between malignant and benign thyroid nodules through fine-needle aspiration cytopathology is crucial for appropriate therapeutic intervention. However, cytopathologic diagnosis is time consuming and hindered by the shortage of experienced cytopathologists. Reliable assistive tools could improve cytopathologic diagnosis efficiency and accuracy. We aimed to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-assistive system for thyroid cytopathologic diagnosis according to the Thyroid Bethesda Reporting System.

Methods

11 254 whole-slide images (WSIs) from 4037 patients were used to train deep learning models. Among the selected WSIs, cell level was manually annotated by cytopathologists according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) guidelines of the second edition (2017 version). A retrospective dataset of 5638 WSIs of 2914 patients from four medical centres was used for validation. 469 patients were recruited for the prospective study of the performance of AI models and their 537 thyroid nodule samples were used. Cohorts for training and validation were enrolled between Jan 1, 2016, and Aug 1, 2022, and the prospective dataset was recruited between Aug 1, 2022, and Jan 1, 2023. The performance of our AI models was estimated as the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The primary outcomes were the prediction sensitivity and specificity of the model to assist cyto-diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Findings

The AUROC of TBSRTC III+ (which distinguishes benign from TBSRTC classes III, IV, V, and VI) was 0·930 (95% CI 0·921–0·939) for Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (SYSMH) internal validation and 0·944 (0·929 – 0·959), 0·939 (0·924–0·955), 0·971 (0·938–1·000) for The First People's Hospital of Foshan (FPHF), Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute (SCHI), and The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (TAHGMU) medical centres, respectively. The AUROC of TBSRTC V+ (which distinguishes benign from TBSRTC classes V and VI) was 0·990 (95% CI 0·986–0·995) for SYSMH internal validation and 0·988 (0·980–0·995), 0·965 (0·953–0·977), and 0·991 (0·972–1·000) for FPHF, SCHI, and TAHGMU medical centres, respectively. For the prospective study at SYSMH, the AUROC of TBSRTC III+ and TBSRTC V+ was 0·977 and 0·981, respectively. With the assistance of AI, the specificity of junior cytopathologists was boosted from 0·887 (95% CI 0·8440–0·922) to 0·993 (0·974–0·999) and the accuracy was improved from 0·877 (0·846–0·904) to 0·948 (0·926–0·965). 186 atypia of undetermined significance samples from 186 patients with BRAF mutation information were collected; 43 of them harbour the BRAFV600E mutation. 91% (39/43) of BRAFV600E-positive atypia o

背景:通过细针穿刺细胞病理学准确区分甲状腺结节的恶性和良性对于适当的治疗干预至关重要。然而,细胞病理学诊断费时费力,而且缺乏有经验的细胞病理学家。可靠的辅助工具可以提高细胞病理学诊断的效率和准确性。我们的目标是根据甲状腺贝塞斯达报告系统开发并测试用于甲状腺细胞病理学诊断的人工智能(AI)辅助系统。在所选的 WSIs 中,细胞病理学家根据第二版(2017 年版)甲状腺细胞病理贝塞斯达报告系统(TBSRTC)指南对细胞水平进行了人工标注。来自四个医疗中心的2914名患者的5638个WSI的回顾性数据集被用于验证。469 名患者被招募参加人工智能模型性能的前瞻性研究,他们的 537 个甲状腺结节样本被用于研究。用于训练和验证的队列是在 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 1 日期间招募的,而前瞻性数据集是在 2022 年 8 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 1 日期间招募的。我们用接收者操作特征下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来估算人工智能模型的性能。主要结果是模型辅助甲状腺结节细胞诊断的预测灵敏度和特异性:中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院(SYSMH)内部验证的 TBSRTC III+(区分良性与 TBSRTC III、IV、V 和 VI 级)的 AUROC 为 0-930(95% CI 0-921-0-939),而内部验证的 AUROC 为 0-944(0-929 - 0-959)、0-939(0-924-0-955)、0-971(0-938-1-000)。SYSMH 内部验证的 TBSRTC V+(区分良性与 TBSRTC V 级和 VI 级)的 AUROC 为 0-990(95% CI 0-986-0-995),FPHF、SCHI 和广州医科大学附属第三医院医疗中心的 AUROC 分别为 0-988(0-980-0-995)、0-965(0-953-0-977)和 0-991(0-972-1-000)。在 SYSMH 的前瞻性研究中,TBSRTC III+ 和 TBSRTC V+ 的 AUROC 分别为 0-977 和 0-981。在人工智能的帮助下,初级细胞病理学家的特异性从0-887(95% CI 0-8440-0-922)提高到0-993(0-974-0-999),准确性从0-877(0-846-0-904)提高到0-948(0-926-0-965)。收集了 186 位患者的 186 份意义未定的不典型样本,其中 43 位患者存在 BRAFV600E 突变。91%(39/43)的BRAFV600E阳性未确定意义的不典型样本被人工智能模型确定为恶性:在这项研究中,我们开发了一种人工智能辅助模型,名为 "甲状腺斑块导向的WSI集合识别(ThyroPower)系统",它有助于快速、稳健地对甲状腺结节进行细胞诊断,从而有可能提高细胞病理学家的诊断能力。此外,它还是缓解细胞病理学家稀缺问题的潜在解决方案:基金:广东省科学技术厅:摘要中译文见补充材料部分。
{"title":"Deep learning models for thyroid nodules diagnosis of fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a retrospective, prospective, multicentre study in China","authors":"Jue Wang MS ,&nbsp;Nafen Zheng BSc ,&nbsp;Huan Wan BSc ,&nbsp;Qinyue Yao MS ,&nbsp;Shijun Jia MS ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Sha Fu MD ,&nbsp;Jingliang Ruan MD ,&nbsp;Gui He BSc ,&nbsp;Xulin Chen MS ,&nbsp;Suiping Li MS ,&nbsp;Rui Chen BSc ,&nbsp;Boan Lai BSc ,&nbsp;Jin Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Qingping Jiang MD ,&nbsp;Prof Nengtai Ouyang MD ,&nbsp;Yin Zhang PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00085-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00085-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Accurately distinguishing between malignant and benign thyroid nodules through fine-needle aspiration cytopathology is crucial for appropriate therapeutic intervention. However, cytopathologic diagnosis is time consuming and hindered by the shortage of experienced cytopathologists. Reliable assistive tools could improve cytopathologic diagnosis efficiency and accuracy. We aimed to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-assistive system for thyroid cytopathologic diagnosis according to the Thyroid Bethesda Reporting System.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>11 254 whole-slide images (WSIs) from 4037 patients were used to train deep learning models. Among the selected WSIs, cell level was manually annotated by cytopathologists according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) guidelines of the second edition (2017 version). A retrospective dataset of 5638 WSIs of 2914 patients from four medical centres was used for validation. 469 patients were recruited for the prospective study of the performance of AI models and their 537 thyroid nodule samples were used. Cohorts for training and validation were enrolled between Jan 1, 2016, and Aug 1, 2022, and the prospective dataset was recruited between Aug 1, 2022, and Jan 1, 2023. The performance of our AI models was estimated as the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The primary outcomes were the prediction sensitivity and specificity of the model to assist cyto-diagnosis of thyroid nodules.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The AUROC of TBSRTC III+ (which distinguishes benign from TBSRTC classes III, IV, V, and VI) was 0·930 (95% CI 0·921–0·939) for Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (SYSMH) internal validation and 0·944 (0·929 – 0·959), 0·939 (0·924–0·955), 0·971 (0·938–1·000) for The First People's Hospital of Foshan (FPHF), Sichuan Cancer Hospital &amp; Institute (SCHI), and The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (TAHGMU) medical centres, respectively. The AUROC of TBSRTC V+ (which distinguishes benign from TBSRTC classes V and VI) was 0·990 (95% CI 0·986–0·995) for SYSMH internal validation and 0·988 (0·980–0·995), 0·965 (0·953–0·977), and 0·991 (0·972–1·000) for FPHF, SCHI, and TAHGMU medical centres, respectively. For the prospective study at SYSMH, the AUROC of TBSRTC III+ and TBSRTC V+ was 0·977 and 0·981, respectively. With the assistance of AI, the specificity of junior cytopathologists was boosted from 0·887 (95% CI 0·8440–0·922) to 0·993 (0·974–0·999) and the accuracy was improved from 0·877 (0·846–0·904) to 0·948 (0·926–0·965). 186 atypia of undetermined significance samples from 186 patients with <em>BRAF</em> mutation information were collected; 43 of them harbour the <em>BRAF</em><sup>V600E</sup> mutation. 91% (39/43) of <em>BRAF</em><sup>V600E</sup>-positive atypia o","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000852/pdfft?md5=d718eec693d6690f3aa369916941141d&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000852-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141288784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence in medicine and the pursuit of environmentally responsible science 医学中的人工智能和追求对环境负责的科学。
IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00090-6
Melany Gaetani , Mjaye Mazwi , Hadrian Balaci , Robert Greer , Christina Maratta
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in medicine and the pursuit of environmentally responsible science","authors":"Melany Gaetani ,&nbsp;Mjaye Mazwi ,&nbsp;Hadrian Balaci ,&nbsp;Robert Greer ,&nbsp;Christina Maratta","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00090-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00090-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000906/pdfft?md5=1aaa78fbfb7a49f99226ead1aa0c786c&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000906-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141180100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Lancet Digital Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1