首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Causal Inference最新文献

英文 中文
Difference-in-Differences
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27.12
Matteo Paradisi
{"title":"Difference-in-Differences","authors":"Matteo Paradisi","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27.12","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"01 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80047755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Homogeneous Treatment Effects 均质处理效果
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.12987/9780300255881-026
{"title":"Homogeneous Treatment Effects","authors":"","doi":"10.12987/9780300255881-026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300255881-026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84327918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Approximate Matching 近似匹配
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.12987/9780300255881-017
Ben Langmead
You are free to use these slides. If you do, please sign the guestbook (www.langmead-lab.org/teaching-materials), or email me (ben.langmead@gmail.com) and tell me briey how you're using them. For original Keynote les, email me.
你可以自由使用这些幻灯片。如果你有的话,请在留言簿上签名(www.langmead-lab.org/teaching-materials),或者给我发邮件(ben.langmead@gmail.com),简单地告诉我你是如何使用它们的。想要了解Keynote的原版,请发邮件给我。
{"title":"Approximate Matching","authors":"Ben Langmead","doi":"10.12987/9780300255881-017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300255881-017","url":null,"abstract":"You are free to use these slides. If you do, please sign the guestbook (www.langmead-lab.org/teaching-materials), or email me (ben.langmead@gmail.com) and tell me briey how you're using them. For original Keynote les, email me.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81736588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Potential Outcomes Causal Model 潜在结果因果模型
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27.7
{"title":"Potential Outcomes Causal Model","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c29t27.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83515369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects 异质性治疗效果
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.12987/9780300255881-029
Kosuke Imai
{"title":"Heterogeneous Treatment Effects","authors":"Kosuke Imai","doi":"10.12987/9780300255881-029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300255881-029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90618310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Radical empiricism and machine learning research 激进经验主义和机器学习研究
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0006
J. Pearl
Abstract I contrast the “data fitting” vs “data interpreting” approaches to data science along three dimensions: Expediency, Transparency, and Explainability. “Data fitting” is driven by the faith that the secret to rational decisions lies in the data itself. In contrast, the data-interpreting school views data, not as a sole source of knowledge but as an auxiliary means for interpreting reality, and “reality” stands for the processes that generate the data. I argue for restoring balance to data science through a task-dependent symbiosis of fitting and interpreting, guided by the Logic of Causation.
我从三个方面对比了数据科学的“数据拟合”和“数据解释”方法:权宜之计、透明度和可解释性。“数据拟合”是由一种信念驱动的,即理性决策的秘密在于数据本身。相反,数据解释学派认为数据不是知识的唯一来源,而是解释现实的辅助手段,而“现实”代表生成数据的过程。我主张在因果逻辑的指导下,通过拟合和解释的任务依赖共生关系,恢复数据科学的平衡。
{"title":"Radical empiricism and machine learning research","authors":"J. Pearl","doi":"10.1515/jci-2021-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract I contrast the “data fitting” vs “data interpreting” approaches to data science along three dimensions: Expediency, Transparency, and Explainability. “Data fitting” is driven by the faith that the secret to rational decisions lies in the data itself. In contrast, the data-interpreting school views data, not as a sole source of knowledge but as an auxiliary means for interpreting reality, and “reality” stands for the processes that generate the data. I argue for restoring balance to data science through a task-dependent symbiosis of fitting and interpreting, guided by the Logic of Causation.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"47 1","pages":"78 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76849388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Identification of causal intervention effects under contagion. 传染情况下因果干预效果的识别。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-05 DOI: 10.1515/jci-2019-0033
Xiaoxuan Cai, Wen Wei Loh, Forrest W Crawford

Defining and identifying causal intervention effects for transmissible infectious disease outcomes is challenging because a treatment - such as a vaccine - given to one individual may affect the infection outcomes of others. Epidemiologists have proposed causal estimands to quantify effects of interventions under contagion using a two-person partnership model. These simple conceptual models have helped researchers develop causal estimands relevant to clinical evaluation of vaccine effects. However, many of these partnership models are formulated under structural assumptions that preclude realistic infectious disease transmission dynamics, limiting their conceptual usefulness in defining and identifying causal treatment effects in empirical intervention trials. In this paper, we propose causal intervention effects in two-person partnerships under arbitrary infectious disease transmission dynamics, and give nonparametric identification results showing how effects can be estimated in empirical trials using time-to-infection or binary outcome data. The key insight is that contagion is a causal phenomenon that induces conditional independencies on infection outcomes that can be exploited for the identification of clinically meaningful causal estimands. These new estimands are compared to existing quantities, and results are illustrated using a realistic simulation of an HIV vaccine trial.

定义和确定可传播传染病结果的因果干预效应具有挑战性,因为给一个人提供的治疗(如疫苗)可能会影响其他人的感染结果。流行病学家提出了因果估算方法,利用两人合作模式量化传染情况下的干预效果。这些简单的概念模型帮助研究人员开发了与疫苗效果临床评估相关的因果关系估计值。然而,这些合作关系模型中的许多模型都是在结构性假设的基础上建立的,排除了现实的传染病传播动态,限制了它们在实证干预试验中定义和识别因果治疗效果的概念用途。在本文中,我们提出了在任意传染病传播动态条件下两人合作关系中的因果干预效应,并给出了非参数识别结果,说明了如何在实证试验中使用感染时间或二元结果数据估算效应。关键的见解是,传染是一种因果现象,会诱发感染结果的条件独立性,可以利用这种条件独立性来识别具有临床意义的因果估计值。我们将这些新的估计值与现有的量进行了比较,并通过对 HIV 疫苗试验的实际模拟来说明结果。
{"title":"Identification of causal intervention effects under contagion.","authors":"Xiaoxuan Cai, Wen Wei Loh, Forrest W Crawford","doi":"10.1515/jci-2019-0033","DOIUrl":"10.1515/jci-2019-0033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defining and identifying causal intervention effects for transmissible infectious disease outcomes is challenging because a treatment - such as a vaccine - given to one individual may affect the infection outcomes of others. Epidemiologists have proposed causal estimands to quantify effects of interventions under contagion using a two-person partnership model. These simple conceptual models have helped researchers develop causal estimands relevant to clinical evaluation of vaccine effects. However, many of these partnership models are formulated under structural assumptions that preclude realistic infectious disease transmission dynamics, limiting their conceptual usefulness in defining and identifying causal treatment effects in empirical intervention trials. In this paper, we propose causal intervention effects in two-person partnerships under arbitrary infectious disease transmission dynamics, and give nonparametric identification results showing how effects can be estimated in empirical trials using time-to-infection or binary outcome data. The key insight is that contagion is a causal phenomenon that induces conditional independencies on infection outcomes that can be exploited for the identification of clinically meaningful causal estimands. These new estimands are compared to existing quantities, and results are illustrated using a realistic simulation of an HIV vaccine trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"9 1","pages":"9-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8528235/pdf/nihms-1684027.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39541807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the bias of adjusting for a non-differentially mismeasured discrete confounder 关于非差分错测离散混杂因素的调整偏差
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0033
J. Peña, Sourabh Vivek Balgi, A. Sjölander, E. Gabriel
Abstract Biological and epidemiological phenomena are often measured with error or imperfectly captured in data. When the true state of this imperfect measure is a confounder of an outcome exposure relationship of interest, it was previously widely believed that adjustment for the mismeasured observed variables provides a less biased estimate of the true average causal effect than not adjusting. However, this is not always the case and depends on both the nature of the measurement and confounding. We describe two sets of conditions under which adjusting for a non-deferentially mismeasured proxy comes closer to the unidentifiable true average causal effect than the unadjusted or crude estimate. The first set of conditions apply when the exposure is discrete or continuous and the confounder is ordinal, and the expectation of the outcome is monotonic in the confounder for both treatment levels contrasted. The second set of conditions apply when the exposure and the confounder are categorical (nominal). In all settings, the mismeasurement must be non-differential, as differential mismeasurement, particularly an unknown pattern, can cause unpredictable results.
生物学和流行病学现象的测量常常有误差或数据捕捉不完美。当这种不完美测量的真实状态是感兴趣的结果暴露关系的混杂因素时,以前人们普遍认为,对错误测量的观察变量进行调整,比不进行调整,对真实平均因果效应的估计偏差更小。然而,情况并非总是如此,这取决于测量和混淆的性质。我们描述了两组条件,在这两组条件下,与未调整或粗糙的估计相比,调整非服从错误测量的代理更接近无法识别的真实平均因果效应。第一组条件适用于暴露是离散的或连续的,混杂因素是有序的,对比两种治疗水平,混杂因素的结果预期是单调的。第二组条件适用于暴露和混杂因素是绝对的(名义的)。在所有情况下,错误测量必须是非微分的,因为微分错误测量,特别是未知模式,可能导致不可预测的结果。
{"title":"On the bias of adjusting for a non-differentially mismeasured discrete confounder","authors":"J. Peña, Sourabh Vivek Balgi, A. Sjölander, E. Gabriel","doi":"10.1515/jci-2021-0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0033","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Biological and epidemiological phenomena are often measured with error or imperfectly captured in data. When the true state of this imperfect measure is a confounder of an outcome exposure relationship of interest, it was previously widely believed that adjustment for the mismeasured observed variables provides a less biased estimate of the true average causal effect than not adjusting. However, this is not always the case and depends on both the nature of the measurement and confounding. We describe two sets of conditions under which adjusting for a non-deferentially mismeasured proxy comes closer to the unidentifiable true average causal effect than the unadjusted or crude estimate. The first set of conditions apply when the exposure is discrete or continuous and the confounder is ordinal, and the expectation of the outcome is monotonic in the confounder for both treatment levels contrasted. The second set of conditions apply when the exposure and the confounder are categorical (nominal). In all settings, the mismeasurement must be non-differential, as differential mismeasurement, particularly an unknown pattern, can cause unpredictable results.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"265 1","pages":"229 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72830204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Causal versions of maximum entropy and principle of insufficient reason 最大熵的因果版本和不充分理性原理
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0022
D. Janzing
Abstract The principle of insufficient reason (PIR) assigns equal probabilities to each alternative of a random experiment whenever there is no reason to prefer one over the other. The maximum entropy principle (MaxEnt) generalizes PIR to the case where statistical information like expectations are given. It is known that both principles result in paradoxical probability updates for joint distributions of cause and effect. This is because constraints on the conditional P ( effect ∣ cause ) Pleft({rm{effect}}| {rm{cause}}) result in changes of P ( cause ) Pleft({rm{cause}}) that assign higher probability to those values of the cause that offer more options for the effect, suggesting “intentional behavior.” Earlier work therefore suggested sequentially maximizing (conditional) entropy according to the causal order, but without further justification apart from plausibility on toy examples. We justify causal modifications of PIR and MaxEnt by separating constraints into restrictions for the cause and restrictions for the mechanism that generates the effect from the cause. We further sketch why causal PIR also entails “Information Geometric Causal Inference.” We briefly discuss problems of generalizing the causal version of MaxEnt to arbitrary causal DAGs.
当没有理由使某一选择优于另一选择时,不充分理由原则(PIR)对随机实验的每一个选择都赋予相等的概率。最大熵原理(MaxEnt)将PIR推广到给出期望等统计信息的情况。众所周知,这两个原理都会导致因果联合分布的悖论概率更新。这是因为对条件P (effect∣cause) Pleft({rm{effect}}| {rm{cause}})的约束导致P (cause) Pleft({rm{cause}})的变化,这些变化将更高的概率分配给那些为结果提供更多选项的原因值,表明“有意行为”。因此,早期的工作建议根据因果顺序依次最大化(条件)熵,但除了在玩具示例上的合理性之外,没有进一步的证明。我们通过将约束分离为对原因的限制和对从原因产生结果的机制的限制来证明PIR和MaxEnt的因果修改。我们进一步概述了为什么因果PIR也需要“信息几何因果推理”。我们简要讨论了将MaxEnt的因果版本推广到任意因果dag的问题。
{"title":"Causal versions of maximum entropy and principle of insufficient reason","authors":"D. Janzing","doi":"10.1515/jci-2021-0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0022","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The principle of insufficient reason (PIR) assigns equal probabilities to each alternative of a random experiment whenever there is no reason to prefer one over the other. The maximum entropy principle (MaxEnt) generalizes PIR to the case where statistical information like expectations are given. It is known that both principles result in paradoxical probability updates for joint distributions of cause and effect. This is because constraints on the conditional P ( effect ∣ cause ) Pleft({rm{effect}}| {rm{cause}}) result in changes of P ( cause ) Pleft({rm{cause}}) that assign higher probability to those values of the cause that offer more options for the effect, suggesting “intentional behavior.” Earlier work therefore suggested sequentially maximizing (conditional) entropy according to the causal order, but without further justification apart from plausibility on toy examples. We justify causal modifications of PIR and MaxEnt by separating constraints into restrictions for the cause and restrictions for the mechanism that generates the effect from the cause. We further sketch why causal PIR also entails “Information Geometric Causal Inference.” We briefly discuss problems of generalizing the causal version of MaxEnt to arbitrary causal DAGs.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"73 1","pages":"285 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76776803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Designing experiments informed by observational studies 根据观察性研究设计实验
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0010
Evan T. R. Rosenman, A. Owen
Abstract The increasing availability of passively observed data has yielded a growing interest in “data fusion” methods, which involve merging data from observational and experimental sources to draw causal conclusions. Such methods often require a precarious tradeoff between the unknown bias in the observational dataset and the often-large variance in the experimental dataset. We propose an alternative approach, which avoids this tradeoff: rather than using observational data for inference, we use it to design a more efficient experiment. We consider the case of a stratified experiment with a binary outcome and suppose pilot estimates for the stratum potential outcome variances can be obtained from the observational study. We extend existing results to generate confidence sets for these variances, while accounting for the possibility of unmeasured confounding. Then, we pose the experimental design problem as a regret minimization problem subject to the constraints imposed by our confidence sets. We show that this problem can be converted into a concave maximization and solved using conventional methods. Finally, we demonstrate the practical utility of our methods using data from the Women’s Health Initiative.
被动观测数据的可用性越来越高,使得人们对“数据融合”方法越来越感兴趣,这种方法涉及将观测和实验来源的数据合并以得出因果结论。这种方法通常需要在观测数据集中的未知偏差和实验数据集中通常较大的方差之间进行不稳定的权衡。我们提出了一种替代方法,避免了这种权衡:而不是使用观测数据进行推理,我们使用它来设计一个更有效的实验。我们考虑具有二元结果的分层实验的情况,并假设可以从观测研究中获得地层潜在结果方差的初步估计。我们扩展现有的结果,为这些方差生成置信集,同时考虑到不可测量的混杂的可能性。然后,我们将实验设计问题作为一个受我们的置信集约束的遗憾最小化问题。我们证明了这个问题可以转化为一个凹最大化问题,并使用常规方法求解。最后,我们利用妇女健康倡议的数据证明了我们的方法的实际效用。
{"title":"Designing experiments informed by observational studies","authors":"Evan T. R. Rosenman, A. Owen","doi":"10.1515/jci-2021-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0010","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The increasing availability of passively observed data has yielded a growing interest in “data fusion” methods, which involve merging data from observational and experimental sources to draw causal conclusions. Such methods often require a precarious tradeoff between the unknown bias in the observational dataset and the often-large variance in the experimental dataset. We propose an alternative approach, which avoids this tradeoff: rather than using observational data for inference, we use it to design a more efficient experiment. We consider the case of a stratified experiment with a binary outcome and suppose pilot estimates for the stratum potential outcome variances can be obtained from the observational study. We extend existing results to generate confidence sets for these variances, while accounting for the possibility of unmeasured confounding. Then, we pose the experimental design problem as a regret minimization problem subject to the constraints imposed by our confidence sets. We show that this problem can be converted into a concave maximization and solved using conventional methods. Finally, we demonstrate the practical utility of our methods using data from the Women’s Health Initiative.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"51 1","pages":"147 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83776795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
期刊
Journal of Causal Inference
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1