Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science最新文献

英文中文

Are We Getting the Full Picture? A Systematic Review of the Assessment of Resistance Training Behavior 我们得到了全貌吗?抗阻训练行为评估的系统综述

4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI: 10.1080/1091367x.2023.2258869

Justin Kompf, Ryan Rhodes

ABSTRACTThe measurement of resistance training (RT) is often based on adaptations of aerobic physical activity measures which may not contain the elements necessary to assess RT. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine what measures are used to assess RT and appraise their composition. Specifically, the inclusion of frequency, duration, intensity, the use of major muscle groups, reps, and sets. Search terms included “resistance training,” “strength training,” OR “weight training” AND “behavior” OR “participation.” Studies were evaluated based on whether RT measures assessed the key components of participation. In the 92 included studies, only one of the six components of the RT recommendations was assessed on average. This was almost exclusively frequency. Many assessments of RT were adapted from aerobic measures without rigorous validity evidence. Construct validity in RT measurement may lead to improved public health recommendations, surveillance of behavior, and precision in determining effective interventions and correlates.KEYWORDS: Resistance trainingstrength trainingassessmentmeasurementbehavior Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2258869Additional informationFundingThis work was not supported by any grant.

【摘要】抗阻训练(RT)的测量通常基于有氧运动测量的适应性，这些测量可能不包含评估RT所需的元素。本系统综述的目的是检查用于评估RT的测量方法及其组成。具体来说，包括频率、持续时间、强度、主要肌肉群的使用、重复次数和组数。搜索词包括“阻力训练”、“力量训练”或“重量训练”、“行为”或“参与”。研究的评估是基于RT测量是否评估了参与的关键组成部分。在纳入的92项研究中，平均只评估了建议的六个组成部分中的一个。这几乎完全是频率。许多RT的评估都是在没有严格的有效性证据的情况下改编自有氧测量。RT测量的结构效度可能会改善公共卫生建议、行为监测以及确定有效干预措施和相关因素的准确性。关键词:阻力训练;力量训练;评估;补充材料本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2258869Additional上在线获取。

{"title":"Are We Getting the Full Picture? A Systematic Review of the Assessment of Resistance Training Behavior","authors":"Justin Kompf, Ryan Rhodes","doi":"10.1080/1091367x.2023.2258869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2023.2258869","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe measurement of resistance training (RT) is often based on adaptations of aerobic physical activity measures which may not contain the elements necessary to assess RT. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine what measures are used to assess RT and appraise their composition. Specifically, the inclusion of frequency, duration, intensity, the use of major muscle groups, reps, and sets. Search terms included “resistance training,” “strength training,” OR “weight training” AND “behavior” OR “participation.” Studies were evaluated based on whether RT measures assessed the key components of participation. In the 92 included studies, only one of the six components of the RT recommendations was assessed on average. This was almost exclusively frequency. Many assessments of RT were adapted from aerobic measures without rigorous validity evidence. Construct validity in RT measurement may lead to improved public health recommendations, surveillance of behavior, and precision in determining effective interventions and correlates.KEYWORDS: Resistance trainingstrength trainingassessmentmeasurementbehavior Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2258869Additional informationFundingThis work was not supported by any grant.","PeriodicalId":48577,"journal":{"name":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135014857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Force-Time Analysis of the Drop Jump: Reliability of Jump Measures and Calculation Methods for Measuring Jump Height 落体跳高的力-时分析:跳高措施的可靠性及跳高测量的计算方法

4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/1091367x.2023.2257169

Huseyin Celik, Ahmet Yildirim, Evrim Unver, Caner Mavili, Ekrem Yilmaz, Ferhat Ozturk, Pinar Arpinar-Avsar, Sukru Alpan Cinemre

The purpose was to evaluate reliability of measurements during drop jump (DJ) and magnitude of differences in vertical jump height (VJH) when calculated using two variables: time-in-the-air and center-of-mass velocity. Thirty-seven handball players performed three single-leg and double-leg DJs on a portable force plate during two sessions. Sixteen outcome measures and four sets of reliability metrics, including intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), were estimated. All outcome measures, except vertical time-to-stabilization, yielded high (0.70–0.89) to very high (0.90–0.96) interday and intraday ICCs for the single-leg and double-leg DJ tests. These results indicated that the single-leg and double-leg DJ tests can be considered reliable for short-term and long-term monitoring of collegiate handball players of both sexes. In addition, the single-leg DJ VJH calculated using these two variables differed in magnitude (mean difference in test measurements: 0.64 cm, p < .001, effect size: 0.165). Therefore, we recommend using the same method to calculate single-leg VJH for long-term monitoring.

目的是在使用两个变量(空中时间和质心速度)计算时，评估落差(DJ)和垂直跳高(VJH)测量值的可靠性。在两场比赛中，37名手球运动员在一个便携式测力板上表演了三次单腿和双腿dj。估计了16项结果测量和4组可靠性指标，包括类内相关系数(ICCs)。除垂直稳定时间外，单腿和双腿DJ试验的日间和日内icc均较高(0.70-0.89)至极高(0.90-0.96)。这些结果表明，单腿和双腿的DJ测试可以被认为是可靠的短期和长期监测的男女大学生手球运动员。此外，使用这两个变量计算的单腿DJ VJH在量级上存在差异(试验测量的平均差异:0.64 cm, p < .001，效应量:0.165)。因此，我们建议使用相同的方法计算长期监测的单腿VJH。

{"title":"Force-Time Analysis of the Drop Jump: Reliability of Jump Measures and Calculation Methods for Measuring Jump Height","authors":"Huseyin Celik, Ahmet Yildirim, Evrim Unver, Caner Mavili, Ekrem Yilmaz, Ferhat Ozturk, Pinar Arpinar-Avsar, Sukru Alpan Cinemre","doi":"10.1080/1091367x.2023.2257169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2023.2257169","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose was to evaluate reliability of measurements during drop jump (DJ) and magnitude of differences in vertical jump height (VJH) when calculated using two variables: time-in-the-air and center-of-mass velocity. Thirty-seven handball players performed three single-leg and double-leg DJs on a portable force plate during two sessions. Sixteen outcome measures and four sets of reliability metrics, including intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), were estimated. All outcome measures, except vertical time-to-stabilization, yielded high (0.70–0.89) to very high (0.90–0.96) interday and intraday ICCs for the single-leg and double-leg DJ tests. These results indicated that the single-leg and double-leg DJ tests can be considered reliable for short-term and long-term monitoring of collegiate handball players of both sexes. In addition, the single-leg DJ VJH calculated using these two variables differed in magnitude (mean difference in test measurements: 0.64 cm, p < .001, effect size: 0.165). Therefore, we recommend using the same method to calculate single-leg VJH for long-term monitoring.","PeriodicalId":48577,"journal":{"name":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135885535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Test–Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the 30 second Sit to Stand Test in Adolescents 青少年30秒坐立测试的测试-复试信度和同时有效性