Seminars in Interventional Radiology最新文献

Percutaneous image-guided locoregional therapies are emerging in the treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cryoablation has emerged as the dominant ablative approach as an alternative to surgery for primary breast cancer in patients who do not wish to have surgery or are poor surgical candidates. Cryoablation is well tolerated and provides excellent local control and cosmesis. Thermal ablation may also be used in the treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer, allowing patients to achieve long disease-free intervals. Transarterial therapies have been studied in the treatment of oligoprogressive hepatic metastasis, though further supportive data would be helpful to demonstrate its efficacy.

Interventional oncology is routinely tasked with the feat of tumor characterization or destruction, via image-guided biopsy and tumor ablation, which may pose difficulties due to challenging-to-reach structures, target complexity, and proximity to critical structures. Such procedures carry a risk-to-benefit ratio along with measurable radiation exposure. To streamline the complexity and inherent variability of these interventions, various systems, including table-, floor-, gantry-, and patient-mounted (semi-) automatic robotic aiming devices, have been developed to decrease human error and interoperator and intraoperator outcome variability. Their implementation in clinical practice holds promise for enhancing lesion targeting, increasing accuracy and technical success rates, reducing procedure duration and radiation exposure, enhancing standardization of the field, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. This narrative review collates evidence regarding robotic tools and their implementation in interventional oncology, focusing on clinical efficacy and safety for nonhepatic malignancies.

Painful skeletal osteolytic metastases, impending pathological fractures, and nondisplaced fractures present as a devastating clinical problem in advanced stage cancer patients. Open surgical approaches provide excellent mechanical stabilization but are often associated with high complication rates and slow recovery times. Percutaneous minimally invasive interventions have arisen as a pragmatic and logical treatment option for patients with late-stage cancer in whom open surgery may be contraindicated. These percutaneous interventions minimize soft tissue dissection, allow for the immediate initiation or resumption of chemotherapies, and present with fewer complications. This review provides the most up-to-date technical and conceptual framework for the minimally invasive management of osseous metastases with particular focus on periacetabular lesions. Fundamental topics discussed are as follows: (1) pathogenesis of cancer-induced bone loss and the importance of local cytoreduction to restore bone quality, (2) anatomy and biomechanics of the acetabulum as a weight-bearing zone, (3) overview of ablation options and cement/screw techniques, and (4) combinatorial approaches. Future studies should include additional studies with more long-term follow-up to better assess mechanical durability of minimally invasive interventions. An acetabulum-specific functional and pain scoring framework should be adopted to allow for better cross-study comparison.

Desmoid tumors (DTs) are rare fibroblastic proliferations, characterized by infiltrative growth and a propensity for local recurrence. Traditional strategies such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are the mainstays of treatment, each with its limitations and associated risks. The trend in DT management leans toward a “wait-and-see” strategy, emphasizing active surveillance supported by continuous MRI monitoring. This approach acknowledges the unpredictable nature of the disease, and a multidisciplinary management of DT requires a nuanced approach, integrating traditional therapies with emerging interventional techniques. This review highlights the emerging role of minimally invasive interventional radiological technologies and discusses interventional radiology techniques, including chemical, radiofrequency, microwave, cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablations as well as transarterial embolization.

Since no uniform treatment protocol for pancreatic irreversible electroporation (IRE) exists, the heterogeneity throughout literature complicates the comparison of results. To reach agreement among experts, a consensus study was performed. Eleven experts, recruited according to predefined criteria regarding previous IRE publications, participated anonymously in three rounds of questionnaires according to a modified Delphi technique. Consensus was defined as having reached ≥80% agreement. Response rates were 100, 64, and 64% in rounds 1 to 3, respectively; consensus was reached in 93%. Pancreatic IRE should be considered for stage III pancreatic cancer and inoperable recurrent disease after previous local treatment. Absolute contraindications are ventricular arrhythmias, implantable stimulation devices, congestive heart failure NYHA class 4, and severe ascites. The inter-electrode distance should be 10 to 20 mm and the exposure length should be 15 mm. After 10 test pulses, 90 treatment pulses of 1,500 V/cm should be delivered continuously, with a 90-µs pulse length. The first postprocedural contrast-enhanced computed tomography should take place 1 month post-IRE, and then every 3 months. This article provides expert recommendations regarding patient selection, procedure, and follow-up for IRE treatment in pancreatic malignancies through a modified Delphi consensus study. Future studies should define the maximum tumor diameter, response evaluation criteria, and the optimal number of preoperative FOLFIRINOX cycles.

Lung cancer continues to be the third leading cause of cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths. As the field of interventional oncology continues to grow, interventional radiologists are increasingly treating lung cancer patients. Involvement begins with tissue diagnosis for which biomarkers and immunohistochemistry are used to guide selective and advanced medical therapies. An interventional radiologist must be aware of the rationale behind tissue diagnosis and techniques to minimize biopsy complications. Staging is an important part of tumor board conversations and drives treatment pathways. Surgical therapy remains the gold standard for early-stage disease but with an aging population the need for less invasive treatments such as radiation therapy and ablation continue to grow. The interventionalist must be aware of the indications, techniques, and pre- and posttherapy managements for percutaneous ablation. Endovascular therapy is broadly divided into therapeutic treatment of lung cancer, which is gaining traction, and treatment of lung cancer complications such as hemoptysis. This review aims to provide a good basis for interventional radiologists treating lung cancer patients.

Image-guided ablation (IGA) is a rapidly developing field in interventional oncology. There is some evidence suggesting IGA's non-inferiority compared with partial or radical nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses (SRM). However, these are mostly limited to retrospective cohort studies. This review article outlines the evidence comparing IGA to partial nephrectomy by collating the different survival measures and evaluates the challenges of producing clinical trials and high-quality evidence. The main challenges are due to the heterogeneity of SRM, patient selection bias, unstandardized endpoint and outcomes, and the lack of global practice standards. Despite the evidence thus far demonstrating that IGA stands as a non-inferior treatment modality for SRMs, exhibiting favorable short- and long-term outcomes, further robust research is needed to integrate ablation techniques into routine clinical practice with a multidisciplinary approach. There is emerging evidence that suggests randomized controlled trial in SRMs is possible, and technologies such as histotripsy as well as artificial intelligence are used in IGA.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) confers significant progression-free survival advantage for patients with small bowel grade 1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NET). PRRT may also be clinically beneficial for patients with NET of pancreatic, bronchial, and other sites of origin; patients with paragangliomas; as well as for patients with well-differentiated grade 3 NET. Direct intra-arterial (IA) administration of PRRT into the hepatic artery for patients with NET liver metastases may result in higher radiopharmaceutical dose and longer dwell time in the liver tumors while relatively sparing non-tumor liver tissue and other organs such as the kidneys and bone marrow when compared with intravenous (IV) administration. This review summarizes currently available data on IA and IV PRRT dose distribution, reports safety and efficacy of IA PRRT, and proposes future research questions.

This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.