首页 > 最新文献

PLoS Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Incidence of self-reported tuberculosis treatment with community-wide universal testing and treatment for HIV and tuberculosis screening in Zambia and South Africa: A planned analysis of the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomised trial. 在赞比亚和南非,通过在社区范围内普及艾滋病毒检测和治疗以及结核病筛查,自我报告的结核病治疗发生率:HPTN 071(PopART)分组随机试验的计划分析。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004393
L Telisinghe, S Floyd, D MacLeod, A Schaap, R Dunbar, J Bwalya, N Bell-Mandla, E Piwowar-Manning, D Donnell, K Shaunaube, P Bock, S Fidler, R J Hayes, H M Ayles
<p><strong>Background: </strong>HIV is a potent risk factor for tuberculosis (TB). Therefore, community-wide universal testing and treatment for HIV (UTT) could contribute to TB control, but evidence for this is limited. Community-wide TB screening can decrease population-level TB prevalence. Combining UTT with TB screening could therefore significantly impact TB control in sub-Saharan Africa, but to our knowledge there is no evidence for this combined approach.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>HPTN 071 (PopART) was a community-randomised trial conducted between November 2013 to July 2018; 21 Zambian and South African communities (with a total population of approximately 1 million individuals) were randomised to arms A (community-wide UTT and TB screening), B (community-wide universal HIV testing with treatment following national guidelines and TB screening), or C (standard-of-care). In a cohort of randomly selected adults (18 to 44 years) enrolled between 2013 and 2015 from all 21 communities (total size 38,474; 27,139 [71%] female; 8,004 [21%] HIV positive) and followed-up annually for 36 months to measure the population-level impact of the interventions, data on self-reported TB treatment in the previous 12 months (self-reported TB) were collected by trained research assistants and recorded using a structured questionnaire at each study visit. In this prespecified analysis of the trial, self-reported TB incidence rates were measured by calendar year between 2014 and 2017/2018. A p-value ≤0.05 on hypothesis testing was defined as reaching statistical significance. Between January 2014 and July 2018, 38,287 individuals were followed-up: 494 self-reported TB during 104,877 person-years. Overall incidence rates were similar across all arms in 2014 and 2015 (0.33 to 0.46/100 person-years). In 2016 incidence rates were lower in arm A compared to C overall (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.28 to 0.81; p = 0.01]), with statistical significance reached. In 2017/2018, while incidence rates were lower in arm A compared to C, statistical significance was not reached (aRR 0.58 [95% CI 0.27 to 1.22; p = 0.13]). Among people living with HIV (PLHIV) incidence rates were lower in arm A compared to C in 2016 (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.29 to 1.08; p = 0.08]) and 2017/2018 (RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26 to 0.95; p = 0.04]); statistical significance was only reached in 2017/2018. Incidence rates in arms B and C were similar, overall and among PLHIV. Among HIV-negative individuals, there were too few events for cross-arm comparisons. Study limitations include the use of self-report which may have been subject to under-reporting, limited covariate adjustment due to the small number of events, and high losses to follow-up over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, community-wide UTT and TB screening resulted in substantially lower TB incidence among PLHIV at population-level, compared to standard-of-care, with statistic
背景:艾滋病毒是结核病(TB)的一个潜在风险因素。因此,在全社区普及艾滋病毒检测和治疗(UTT)有助于结核病的控制,但这方面的证据有限。全社区范围内的结核病筛查可以降低人群结核病患病率。因此,将 UTT 与结核病筛查结合起来,可对撒哈拉以南非洲地区的结核病控制产生重大影响,但据我们所知,目前还没有证据表明这种结合方法可行:HPTN 071(PopART)是一项社区随机试验,在 2013 年 11 月至 2018 年 7 月期间进行;21 个赞比亚和南非社区(总人口约 100 万)被随机分配到 A 组(全社区UTT 和结核病筛查)、B 组(全社区普遍进行 HIV 检测,并按照国家指南进行治疗和结核病筛查)或 C 组(标准护理)。在 2013 年至 2015 年期间从所有 21 个社区(总人数为 38,474 人;女性 27,139 人 [71%];HIV 阳性 8,004 人 [21%])随机选取的成人(18 至 44 岁)组成的队列中,每年进行为期 36 个月的随访,以衡量干预措施对人群的影响。在这项预设的试验分析中,2014 年至 2017/2018 年期间的自报肺结核发病率按日历年进行测量。假设检验的 p 值≤0.05 即为达到统计学意义。2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间,共对 38287 人进行了随访:在 104,877 人年中,494 人自我报告了结核病。2014 年和 2015 年,所有治疗组的总体发病率相似(0.33 至 0.46/100 人年)。2016 年,与 C 组相比,A 组的总体发病率较低(调整率比 [aRR] 0.48 [95% 置信区间 (95% CI) 0.28 至 0.81; p = 0.01]),达到统计学意义。在 2017/2018 年,虽然 A 组的发病率低于 C 组,但未达到统计学意义(aRR 0.58 [95% CI 0.27 至 1.22;p = 0.13])。在艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)中,2016 年(RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.29 至 1.08; p = 0.08])和 2017/2018 年(RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26 至 0.95; p = 0.04])A 组的发病率低于 C 组;仅在 2017/2018 年达到统计学意义。B 组和 C 组的总体发病率和艾滋病毒感染者的发病率相似。在艾滋病毒阴性者中,由于事件太少,无法进行交叉臂比较。研究的局限性包括:采用自我报告,可能存在报告不足的情况;由于事件数量较少,协变量调整有限;随访损失率较高:在这项研究中,与标准护理相比,社区范围内的UTT和肺结核筛查大大降低了艾滋病毒感染者在人群中的肺结核发病率,并在研究的最后一年达到了统计学意义。还有一些证据表明,这也导致了人群中自我报告的结核病发病率整体下降。A 组而非 B 组的减少表明,UTT 推动了观察到的效果。我们的数据支持UTT在结核病/艾滋病毒高负担环境中除控制艾滋病毒外,还在结核病控制中发挥作用:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01900977。
{"title":"Incidence of self-reported tuberculosis treatment with community-wide universal testing and treatment for HIV and tuberculosis screening in Zambia and South Africa: A planned analysis of the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomised trial.","authors":"L Telisinghe, S Floyd, D MacLeod, A Schaap, R Dunbar, J Bwalya, N Bell-Mandla, E Piwowar-Manning, D Donnell, K Shaunaube, P Bock, S Fidler, R J Hayes, H M Ayles","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004393","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004393","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;HIV is a potent risk factor for tuberculosis (TB). Therefore, community-wide universal testing and treatment for HIV (UTT) could contribute to TB control, but evidence for this is limited. Community-wide TB screening can decrease population-level TB prevalence. Combining UTT with TB screening could therefore significantly impact TB control in sub-Saharan Africa, but to our knowledge there is no evidence for this combined approach.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods and findings: &lt;/strong&gt;HPTN 071 (PopART) was a community-randomised trial conducted between November 2013 to July 2018; 21 Zambian and South African communities (with a total population of approximately 1 million individuals) were randomised to arms A (community-wide UTT and TB screening), B (community-wide universal HIV testing with treatment following national guidelines and TB screening), or C (standard-of-care). In a cohort of randomly selected adults (18 to 44 years) enrolled between 2013 and 2015 from all 21 communities (total size 38,474; 27,139 [71%] female; 8,004 [21%] HIV positive) and followed-up annually for 36 months to measure the population-level impact of the interventions, data on self-reported TB treatment in the previous 12 months (self-reported TB) were collected by trained research assistants and recorded using a structured questionnaire at each study visit. In this prespecified analysis of the trial, self-reported TB incidence rates were measured by calendar year between 2014 and 2017/2018. A p-value ≤0.05 on hypothesis testing was defined as reaching statistical significance. Between January 2014 and July 2018, 38,287 individuals were followed-up: 494 self-reported TB during 104,877 person-years. Overall incidence rates were similar across all arms in 2014 and 2015 (0.33 to 0.46/100 person-years). In 2016 incidence rates were lower in arm A compared to C overall (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.28 to 0.81; p = 0.01]), with statistical significance reached. In 2017/2018, while incidence rates were lower in arm A compared to C, statistical significance was not reached (aRR 0.58 [95% CI 0.27 to 1.22; p = 0.13]). Among people living with HIV (PLHIV) incidence rates were lower in arm A compared to C in 2016 (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.29 to 1.08; p = 0.08]) and 2017/2018 (RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26 to 0.95; p = 0.04]); statistical significance was only reached in 2017/2018. Incidence rates in arms B and C were similar, overall and among PLHIV. Among HIV-negative individuals, there were too few events for cross-arm comparisons. Study limitations include the use of self-report which may have been subject to under-reporting, limited covariate adjustment due to the small number of events, and high losses to follow-up over time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;In this study, community-wide UTT and TB screening resulted in substantially lower TB incidence among PLHIV at population-level, compared to standard-of-care, with statistic","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142425/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141184104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review. 影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女参与临床试验的因素:混合方法系统综述。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405
Mridula Shankar, Alya Hazfiarini, Rana Islamiah Zahroh, Joshua P Vogel, Annie R A McDougall, Patrick Condron, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Yeshita V Pujar, Manjunath S Somannavar, Umesh Charantimath, Anne Ammerdorffer, Sara Rushwan, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Meghan A Bohren

Background: Poor representation of pregnant and lactating women and people in clinical trials has marginalised their health concerns and denied the maternal-fetal/infant dyad benefits of innovation in therapeutic research and development. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesised factors affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials, across all levels of the research ecosystem.

Methods and findings: We searched 8 databases from inception to 14 February 2024 to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that described factors affecting participation of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials in any setting. We used thematic synthesis to analyse the qualitative literature and assessed confidence in each qualitative review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We compared quantitative data against the thematic synthesis findings to assess areas of convergence or divergence. We mapped review findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to inform future development of behaviour change strategies. We included 60 papers from 27 countries. We grouped 24 review findings under 5 overarching themes: (a) interplay between perceived risks and benefits of participation in women's decision-making; (b) engagement between women and the medical and research ecosystems; (c) gender norms and decision-making autonomy; (d) factors affecting clinical trial recruitment; and (e) upstream factors in the research ecosystem. Women's willingness to participate in trials was affected by: perceived risk of the health condition weighed against an intervention's risks and benefits, therapeutic optimism, intervention acceptability, expectations of receiving higher quality care in a trial, altruistic motivations, intimate relationship dynamics, and power and trust in medicine and research. Health workers supported women's participation in trials when they perceived clinical equipoise, had hope for novel therapeutic applications, and were convinced an intervention was safe. For research staff, developing reciprocal relationships with health workers, having access to resources for trial implementation, ensuring the trial was visible to potential participants and health workers, implementing a woman-centred approach when communicating with potential participants, and emotional orientations towards the trial were factors perceived to affect recruitment. For study investigators and ethics committees, the complexities and subjectivities in risk assessments and trial design, and limited funding of such trials contributed to their reluctance in leading and approving such trials. All included studies focused on factors affecting participation of cisgender pregnant women in clinical trials; future research should consider other pregnancy-capable populations, including transgende

背景:孕妇和哺乳期妇女及人群在临床试验中的代表性较低,这使得她们所关注的健康问题被边缘化,并剥夺了治疗研发创新所带来的母胎/婴儿双方面的益处。这项混合方法的系统性综述综合了影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女参与临床试验的因素,涉及研究生态系统的各个层面:我们检索了从开始到 2024 年 2 月 14 日的 8 个数据库,以确定描述影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女在任何环境下参与疫苗和治疗临床试验的因素的定性、定量和混合方法研究。我们采用专题综合法对定性文献进行了分析,并采用 GRADE-CERQual 法评估了每项定性综述结论的可信度。我们将定量数据与专题综述结果进行比较,以评估趋同或分歧的领域。我们将综述结果与理论领域框架 (TDF) 和行为能力、机会和动机模型 (COM-B) 相结合,为今后制定行为改变策略提供参考。我们收录了来自 27 个国家的 60 篇论文。我们将 24 项综述结果归纳为 5 大主题:(a) 妇女参与决策的风险感知与收益之间的相互作用;(b) 妇女与医疗和研究生态系统之间的互动;(c) 性别规范与决策自主权;(d) 影响临床试验招募的因素;以及 (e) 研究生态系统中的上游因素。妇女参与试验的意愿受到以下因素的影响:根据干预措施的风险和益处权衡健康状况的感知风险、治疗乐观主义、干预措施的可接受性、期望在试验中获得更高质量的护理、利他动机、亲密关系动态以及权力和对医学与研究的信任。当医护人员认为临床不存在问题、对新的治疗方法抱有希望并确信干预措施是安全的,他们就会支持妇女参与试验。对于研究人员来说,与医护人员建立互惠关系、获得试验实施所需的资源、确保潜在参与者和医护人员了解试验、在与潜在参与者沟通时采用以女性为中心的方法以及对试验的情感取向,都是影响招募的因素。对于研究调查人员和伦理委员会来说,风险评估和试验设计的复杂性和主观性,以及此类试验的资金有限,都是他们不愿领导和批准此类试验的原因。所有纳入的研究都侧重于影响顺性别孕妇参与临床试验的因素;未来的研究应考虑其他可怀孕人群,包括变性人和非二元性人群:本系统综述强调了影响孕妇和哺乳期妇女参与临床试验的多个层面和利益相关者的各种因素。通过将已识别的因素与行为改变框架联系起来,我们制定了具有理论依据的策略,有助于优化孕妇和哺乳期妇女在此类试验中的参与度、参与度和信任度。
{"title":"Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review.","authors":"Mridula Shankar, Alya Hazfiarini, Rana Islamiah Zahroh, Joshua P Vogel, Annie R A McDougall, Patrick Condron, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Yeshita V Pujar, Manjunath S Somannavar, Umesh Charantimath, Anne Ammerdorffer, Sara Rushwan, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Meghan A Bohren","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor representation of pregnant and lactating women and people in clinical trials has marginalised their health concerns and denied the maternal-fetal/infant dyad benefits of innovation in therapeutic research and development. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesised factors affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials, across all levels of the research ecosystem.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We searched 8 databases from inception to 14 February 2024 to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that described factors affecting participation of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials in any setting. We used thematic synthesis to analyse the qualitative literature and assessed confidence in each qualitative review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We compared quantitative data against the thematic synthesis findings to assess areas of convergence or divergence. We mapped review findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to inform future development of behaviour change strategies. We included 60 papers from 27 countries. We grouped 24 review findings under 5 overarching themes: (a) interplay between perceived risks and benefits of participation in women's decision-making; (b) engagement between women and the medical and research ecosystems; (c) gender norms and decision-making autonomy; (d) factors affecting clinical trial recruitment; and (e) upstream factors in the research ecosystem. Women's willingness to participate in trials was affected by: perceived risk of the health condition weighed against an intervention's risks and benefits, therapeutic optimism, intervention acceptability, expectations of receiving higher quality care in a trial, altruistic motivations, intimate relationship dynamics, and power and trust in medicine and research. Health workers supported women's participation in trials when they perceived clinical equipoise, had hope for novel therapeutic applications, and were convinced an intervention was safe. For research staff, developing reciprocal relationships with health workers, having access to resources for trial implementation, ensuring the trial was visible to potential participants and health workers, implementing a woman-centred approach when communicating with potential participants, and emotional orientations towards the trial were factors perceived to affect recruitment. For study investigators and ethics committees, the complexities and subjectivities in risk assessments and trial design, and limited funding of such trials contributed to their reluctance in leading and approving such trials. All included studies focused on factors affecting participation of cisgender pregnant women in clinical trials; future research should consider other pregnancy-capable populations, including transgende","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11139290/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141181361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers to engagement in the care cascade for tuberculosis disease in India: A systematic review of quantitative studies. 印度结核病患者参与治疗的障碍:定量研究的系统回顾。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-28 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004409
Tulip A Jhaveri, Disha Jhaveri, Amith Galivanche, Maya Lubeck-Schricker, Dominic Voehler, Mei Chung, Pruthu Thekkur, Vineet Chadha, Ruvandhi Nathavitharana, Ajay M V Kumar, Hemant Deepak Shewade, Katherine Powers, Kenneth H Mayer, Jessica E Haberer, Paul Bain, Madhukar Pai, Srinath Satyanarayana, Ramnath Subbaraman
<p><strong>Background: </strong>India accounts for about one-quarter of people contracting tuberculosis (TB) disease annually and nearly one-third of TB deaths globally. Many Indians do not navigate all care cascade stages to receive TB treatment and achieve recurrence-free survival. Guided by a population/exposure/comparison/outcomes (PECO) framework, we report findings of a systematic review to identify factors contributing to unfavorable outcomes across each care cascade gap for TB disease in India.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We defined care cascade gaps as comprising people with confirmed or presumptive TB who did not: start the TB diagnostic workup (Gap 1), complete the workup (Gap 2), start treatment (Gap 3), achieve treatment success (Gap 4), or achieve TB recurrence-free survival (Gap 5). Three systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000 to August 14, 2023 were conducted. We identified articles evaluating factors associated with unfavorable outcomes for each gap (reported as adjusted odds, relative risk, or hazard ratios) and, among people experiencing unfavorable outcomes, reasons for these outcomes (reported as proportions), with specific quality or risk of bias criteria for each gap. Findings were organized into person-, family-, and society-, or health system-related factors, using a social-ecological framework. Factors associated with unfavorable outcomes across multiple cascade stages included: male sex, older age, poverty-related factors, lower symptom severity or duration, undernutrition, alcohol use, smoking, and distrust of (or dissatisfaction with) health services. People previously treated for TB were more likely to seek care and engage in the diagnostic workup (Gaps 1 and 2) but more likely to suffer pretreatment loss to follow-up (Gap 3) and unfavorable treatment outcomes (Gap 4), especially those who were lost to follow-up during their prior treatment. For individual care cascade gaps, multiple studies highlighted lack of TB knowledge and structural barriers (e.g., transportation challenges) as contributing to lack of care-seeking for TB symptoms (Gap 1, 14 studies); lack of access to diagnostics (e.g., X-ray), non-identification of eligible people for testing, and failure of providers to communicate concern for TB as contributing to non-completion of the diagnostic workup (Gap 2, 17 studies); stigma, poor recording of patient contact information by providers, and early death from diagnostic delays as contributing to pretreatment loss to follow-up (Gap 3, 15 studies); and lack of TB knowledge, stigma, depression, and medication adverse effects as contributing to unfavorable treatment outcomes (Gap 4, 86 studies). Medication nonadherence contributed to unfavorable treatment outcomes (Gap 4) and TB recurrence (Gap 5, 14 studies). Limitations include lack of meta-analyses due to the heterogeneity of findings and limited generalizability to some Indian regions, given the coun
背景:印度每年约有四分之一的人感染结核病(TB),占全球结核病死亡人数的近三分之一。许多印度人无法通过所有治疗阶段接受结核病治疗并获得无复发生存。在人群/暴露/比较/结果(PECO)框架的指导下,我们报告了一项系统性研究的结果,以确定导致印度肺结核病各护理级联差距产生不利结果的因素:我们将治疗差距定义为:确诊或推定肺结核患者未开始肺结核诊断工作(差距 1)、未完成诊断工作(差距 2)、未开始治疗(差距 3)、未获得治疗成功(差距 4)或未获得无肺结核复发生存(差距 5)。我们对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 14 日期间的 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了三次系统检索。我们确定了评估与每个差距的不利结果相关的因素(以调整后的几率、相对风险或危险比的形式报告)的文章,以及在出现不利结果的人群中,出现这些结果的原因(以比例的形式报告)的文章,并确定了每个差距的具体质量或偏倚风险标准。研究结果采用社会生态框架,按个人、家庭、社会或健康系统相关因素进行分类。与多个级联阶段的不利结果相关的因素包括:男性、年龄较大、与贫困相关的因素、症状严重程度较低或持续时间较短、营养不良、饮酒、吸烟以及对医疗服务的不信任(或不满意)。曾接受过结核病治疗的患者更有可能寻求医疗服务并参与诊断工作(差距 1 和 2),但更有可能在治疗前失去随访机会(差距 3)和出现不利的治疗结果(差距 4),尤其是那些在之前的治疗过程中失去随访机会的患者。关于个别护理差距,多项研究强调,缺乏结核病知识和结构性障碍(如交通不便)是导致出现结核病症状时不寻求护理的原因(差距 1,14 项研究);缺乏获得诊断(如 X 光)的途径、无法识别结核病患者(差距 2,14 项研究);以及缺乏获得治疗的途径(差距 3,14 项研究)、缺乏诊断途径(如 X 光)、无法识别符合检测条件的人群以及医疗服务提供者未能传达对结核病的关注,是导致未完成诊断工作的原因(差距 2,17 项研究);耻辱感、医疗服务提供者对患者联系信息的记录不全以及诊断延误导致的早期死亡,是导致治疗前失去随访的原因(差距 3,15 项研究);缺乏结核病知识、耻辱感、抑郁以及药物不良反应,是导致治疗结果不理想的原因(差距 4,86 项研究)。不坚持用药导致治疗效果不佳(差距 4)和结核病复发(差距 5,14 项研究)。局限性包括:由于研究结果的异质性,缺乏荟萃分析;由于印度人口的多样性,对印度某些地区的推广性有限:本系统综述揭示了影响印度肺结核患者治疗结果的常见风险模式,同时强调了知识差距--尤其是有关儿童或私营部门的肺结核治疗--以指导未来的研究。研究结果可为针对结果不佳风险较高的肺结核患者提供支持服务提供依据,并为多成分干预措施提供信息,以弥补治疗过程中的不足。
{"title":"Barriers to engagement in the care cascade for tuberculosis disease in India: A systematic review of quantitative studies.","authors":"Tulip A Jhaveri, Disha Jhaveri, Amith Galivanche, Maya Lubeck-Schricker, Dominic Voehler, Mei Chung, Pruthu Thekkur, Vineet Chadha, Ruvandhi Nathavitharana, Ajay M V Kumar, Hemant Deepak Shewade, Katherine Powers, Kenneth H Mayer, Jessica E Haberer, Paul Bain, Madhukar Pai, Srinath Satyanarayana, Ramnath Subbaraman","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004409","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004409","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;India accounts for about one-quarter of people contracting tuberculosis (TB) disease annually and nearly one-third of TB deaths globally. Many Indians do not navigate all care cascade stages to receive TB treatment and achieve recurrence-free survival. Guided by a population/exposure/comparison/outcomes (PECO) framework, we report findings of a systematic review to identify factors contributing to unfavorable outcomes across each care cascade gap for TB disease in India.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods and findings: &lt;/strong&gt;We defined care cascade gaps as comprising people with confirmed or presumptive TB who did not: start the TB diagnostic workup (Gap 1), complete the workup (Gap 2), start treatment (Gap 3), achieve treatment success (Gap 4), or achieve TB recurrence-free survival (Gap 5). Three systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000 to August 14, 2023 were conducted. We identified articles evaluating factors associated with unfavorable outcomes for each gap (reported as adjusted odds, relative risk, or hazard ratios) and, among people experiencing unfavorable outcomes, reasons for these outcomes (reported as proportions), with specific quality or risk of bias criteria for each gap. Findings were organized into person-, family-, and society-, or health system-related factors, using a social-ecological framework. Factors associated with unfavorable outcomes across multiple cascade stages included: male sex, older age, poverty-related factors, lower symptom severity or duration, undernutrition, alcohol use, smoking, and distrust of (or dissatisfaction with) health services. People previously treated for TB were more likely to seek care and engage in the diagnostic workup (Gaps 1 and 2) but more likely to suffer pretreatment loss to follow-up (Gap 3) and unfavorable treatment outcomes (Gap 4), especially those who were lost to follow-up during their prior treatment. For individual care cascade gaps, multiple studies highlighted lack of TB knowledge and structural barriers (e.g., transportation challenges) as contributing to lack of care-seeking for TB symptoms (Gap 1, 14 studies); lack of access to diagnostics (e.g., X-ray), non-identification of eligible people for testing, and failure of providers to communicate concern for TB as contributing to non-completion of the diagnostic workup (Gap 2, 17 studies); stigma, poor recording of patient contact information by providers, and early death from diagnostic delays as contributing to pretreatment loss to follow-up (Gap 3, 15 studies); and lack of TB knowledge, stigma, depression, and medication adverse effects as contributing to unfavorable treatment outcomes (Gap 4, 86 studies). Medication nonadherence contributed to unfavorable treatment outcomes (Gap 4) and TB recurrence (Gap 5, 14 studies). Limitations include lack of meta-analyses due to the heterogeneity of findings and limited generalizability to some Indian regions, given the coun","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166313/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aetiology of vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, and genital ulcer in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-regression. 撒哈拉以南非洲地区阴道分泌物、尿道分泌物和生殖器溃疡的病因:系统回顾与元回归。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-20 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004385
Julia Michalow, Magdalene K Walters, Olanrewaju Edun, Max Wybrant, Bethan Davies, Tendesayi Kufa, Thabitha Mathega, Sungai T Chabata, Frances M Cowan, Anne Cori, Marie-Claude Boily, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton

Background: Syndromic management is widely used to treat symptomatic sexually transmitted infections in settings without aetiologic diagnostics. However, underlying aetiologies and consequent treatment suitability are uncertain without regular assessment. This systematic review estimated the distribution, trends, and determinants of aetiologies for vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, and genital ulcer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Methods and findings: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, Web of Science, and grey literature from inception until December 20, 2023, for observational studies reporting aetiologic diagnoses among symptomatic populations in SSA. We adjusted observations for diagnostic test performance, used generalised linear mixed-effects meta-regressions to generate estimates, and critically appraised studies using an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Of 4,418 identified records, 206 reports were included from 190 studies in 32 countries conducted between 1969 and 2022. In 2015, estimated primary aetiologies for vaginal discharge were candidiasis (69.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 44.3% to 86.6%], n = 50), bacterial vaginosis (50.0% [95% CI: 32.3% to 67.8%], n = 39), chlamydia (16.2% [95% CI: 8.6% to 28.5%], n = 50), and trichomoniasis (12.9% [95% CI: 7.7% to 20.7%], n = 80); for urethral discharge were gonorrhoea (77.1% [95% CI: 68.1% to 84.1%], n = 68) and chlamydia (21.9% [95% CI: 15.4% to 30.3%], n = 48); and for genital ulcer were herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) (48.3% [95% CI: 32.9% to 64.1%], n = 47) and syphilis (9.3% [95% CI: 6.4% to 13.4%], n = 117). Temporal variation was substantial, particularly for genital ulcer where HSV-2 replaced chancroid as the primary cause. Aetiologic distributions for each symptom were largely the same across regions and population strata, despite HIV status and age being significantly associated with several infection diagnoses. Limitations of the review include the absence of studies in 16 of 48 SSA countries, substantial heterogeneity in study observations, and impeded assessment of this variability due to incomplete or inconsistent reporting across studies.

Conclusions: In our study, syndrome aetiologies in SSA aligned with World Health Organization guidelines without strong evidence of geographic or demographic variation, supporting broad guideline applicability. Temporal changes underscore the importance of regular aetiologic re-assessment for effective syndromic management.

Prospero number: CRD42022348045.

背景:在没有病因诊断的情况下,综合治疗被广泛用于治疗无症状性传播感染。然而,如果不进行定期评估,潜在的病因和相应的治疗适宜性是不确定的。本系统性综述估计了撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)阴道分泌物、尿道分泌物和生殖器溃疡的病因分布、趋势和决定因素:我们检索了 Embase、MEDLINE、Global Health、Web of Science 和灰色文献,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 12 月 20 日,检索对象为报告撒哈拉以南非洲有症状人群病因诊断的观察性研究。我们根据诊断测试结果对观察结果进行了调整,使用广义线性混合效应元回归得出估计值,并使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)改编的核对表对研究进行了严格评估。在已确认的 4418 条记录中,共纳入了来自 32 个国家的 190 项研究的 206 份报告,这些研究是在 1969 年至 2022 年间进行的。2015 年,阴道分泌物的主要病因估计为念珠菌病(69.4% [95% 置信区间 (CI):44.3% 至 86.6%],n = 50)、细菌性阴道病(50.0% [95% CI:32.3% 至 67.8%],n = 39)、衣原体病(16.2% [95% CI:8.6% 至 28.5%],n = 50)和滴虫病(12.9% [95% CI:7.7% 至 20.7%], n = 80);尿道分泌物方面,淋病(77.1% [95% CI: 68.1% to 84.1%],n = 68)和衣原体(21.9% [95% CI: 15.4% to 30.3%],人数=48);生殖器溃疡为单纯疱疹病毒 2 型(HSV-2)(48.3% [95% CI:32.9% 至 64.1%],人数=47)和梅毒(9.3% [95% CI:6.4% 至 13.4%],人数=117)。时间上的差异很大,尤其是生殖器溃疡,HSV-2 取代软下疳成为主要病因。尽管 HIV 感染状况和年龄与几种感染诊断有显著相关性,但每种症状的病原学分布在不同地区和人群中大致相同。综述的局限性包括:在 48 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家中,有 16 个国家没有进行研究;研究观察结果存在很大的异质性;由于各研究的报告不完整或不一致,对这种异质性的评估受到了阻碍:在我们的研究中,撒哈拉以南非洲地区的综合征病因与世界卫生组织的指南一致,没有强有力的证据表明存在地域或人口差异,这支持了指南的广泛适用性。时间上的变化强调了定期重新评估病因对有效综合征管理的重要性:CRD42022348045。
{"title":"Aetiology of vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, and genital ulcer in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-regression.","authors":"Julia Michalow, Magdalene K Walters, Olanrewaju Edun, Max Wybrant, Bethan Davies, Tendesayi Kufa, Thabitha Mathega, Sungai T Chabata, Frances M Cowan, Anne Cori, Marie-Claude Boily, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004385","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Syndromic management is widely used to treat symptomatic sexually transmitted infections in settings without aetiologic diagnostics. However, underlying aetiologies and consequent treatment suitability are uncertain without regular assessment. This systematic review estimated the distribution, trends, and determinants of aetiologies for vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, and genital ulcer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, Web of Science, and grey literature from inception until December 20, 2023, for observational studies reporting aetiologic diagnoses among symptomatic populations in SSA. We adjusted observations for diagnostic test performance, used generalised linear mixed-effects meta-regressions to generate estimates, and critically appraised studies using an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Of 4,418 identified records, 206 reports were included from 190 studies in 32 countries conducted between 1969 and 2022. In 2015, estimated primary aetiologies for vaginal discharge were candidiasis (69.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 44.3% to 86.6%], n = 50), bacterial vaginosis (50.0% [95% CI: 32.3% to 67.8%], n = 39), chlamydia (16.2% [95% CI: 8.6% to 28.5%], n = 50), and trichomoniasis (12.9% [95% CI: 7.7% to 20.7%], n = 80); for urethral discharge were gonorrhoea (77.1% [95% CI: 68.1% to 84.1%], n = 68) and chlamydia (21.9% [95% CI: 15.4% to 30.3%], n = 48); and for genital ulcer were herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) (48.3% [95% CI: 32.9% to 64.1%], n = 47) and syphilis (9.3% [95% CI: 6.4% to 13.4%], n = 117). Temporal variation was substantial, particularly for genital ulcer where HSV-2 replaced chancroid as the primary cause. Aetiologic distributions for each symptom were largely the same across regions and population strata, despite HIV status and age being significantly associated with several infection diagnoses. Limitations of the review include the absence of studies in 16 of 48 SSA countries, substantial heterogeneity in study observations, and impeded assessment of this variability due to incomplete or inconsistent reporting across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, syndrome aetiologies in SSA aligned with World Health Organization guidelines without strong evidence of geographic or demographic variation, supporting broad guideline applicability. Temporal changes underscore the importance of regular aetiologic re-assessment for effective syndromic management.</p><p><strong>Prospero number: </strong>CRD42022348045.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104670/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141070858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial. 利用聚焦超声刺激微气泡增强乳腺癌的放射治疗:一期临床试验。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408
D. Moore-Palhares, A. Dasgupta, M. Saifuddin, Maria Lourdes Anzola Pena, S. Prasla, L. Ho, Lin Lu, Joseph Kung, Evan McNabb, L. Sannachi, D. Vesprini, Hanbo Chen, Irene Karam, Hany Soliman, Ewa Szumacher, E. Chow, Sonal Gandhi, Maureen Trudeau, B. Curpen, G. Stanisz, Michael C. Kolios, G. Czarnota
BACKGROUNDPreclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer.METHODS AND FINDINGSThis prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitations include variable tumour sizes and dose fr
背景临床研究表明,放疗与聚焦超声刺激微泡(FUS-MB)治疗相结合,可将肿瘤细胞的死亡率提高 10 到 40 倍。微气泡(血管内气体微球)在靶体积内的声学暴露会导致气泡空化,从而引起肿瘤血管的扰动,激活内皮细胞凋亡通路,从而产生立体定向体放射治疗的烧蚀效应。随后对微气泡敏感的肿瘤进行照射会迅速增加肿瘤的死亡。本研究介绍了磁共振(MR)引导的 FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB)治疗的成熟安全性和疗效结果,这是一种治疗乳腺癌的放射增强疗法。方法和结果这项前瞻性、单中心、单臂 1 期临床试验纳入了 I-IV 期乳腺癌原位肿瘤患者,多学科团队认为乳腺或胸壁放疗已足够(clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT04431674)。如果患者有造影剂增强磁共振或微气泡用药禁忌症,则排除在外。患者在整个放疗过程中接受了 2 到 3 次 MRgFUS-MB 治疗。磁共振耦合聚焦超声设备的工作频率为 800 kHz,峰值负压为 570 kPa,用于在磁共振引导的靶体积内超声注射静脉注射的微泡。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)v5.0,主要结果是急性毒性。次要结果是 3 个月时的肿瘤反应和局部控制(LC)。2020年8月至2022年11月期间,共有21名患有23种原发性乳腺肿瘤的女性患者登记并被分配接受干预治疗。三名患者随后撤回了同意书,因此有18名患者的20个肿瘤被纳入安全性和LC分析。两名患者在治疗结束后 3 个月内因转移性疾病进展而死亡,因此未纳入肿瘤反应分析。规定的放射剂量为20 Gy/5次(40%,n=8/20)、30至35 Gy/5次(35%,n=7/20)、30至40 Gy/10次(15%,n=3/20)和66 Gy/33次(10%,n=2/20)。中位随访时间为 9 个月(0.3 至 29 个月)。放射性皮炎是最常见的急性毒性(16/20 例为 1 级,1/20 例为 2 级,2/20 例为 3 级)。一名患者出现 1 级过敏反应,可能与使用微气泡有关。3 个月后,对 18 个肿瘤进行了反应评估:9例完全应答(50%,n=9/18),6例部分应答(33%,n=6/18),2例病情稳定(11%,n=2/18),1例病情进展(6%,n=1/18)。对反应的进一步随访表明,6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月的 LC 率分别为 94%(95% 置信区间 [CI] [84%, 100%] )、88%(95% CI [75%, 100%] )和 76%(95% CI [54%, 100%] )。结论MRgFUS-MB 是一种创新的放射增强疗法,具有安全的特点、潜在的良好反应和持久的 LC。这些结果值得在 2 期临床试验中进行验证。试验注册clinicaltrials.gov,标识符 NCT04431674。
{"title":"Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial.","authors":"D. Moore-Palhares, A. Dasgupta, M. Saifuddin, Maria Lourdes Anzola Pena, S. Prasla, L. Ho, Lin Lu, Joseph Kung, Evan McNabb, L. Sannachi, D. Vesprini, Hanbo Chen, Irene Karam, Hany Soliman, Ewa Szumacher, E. Chow, Sonal Gandhi, Maureen Trudeau, B. Curpen, G. Stanisz, Michael C. Kolios, G. Czarnota","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS AND FINDINGS\u0000This prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitations include variable tumour sizes and dose fr","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140966558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial. 利用聚焦超声刺激微气泡增强乳腺癌的放射治疗:一期临床试验。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-17 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408
Daniel Moore-Palhares, Archya Dasgupta, Murtuza Saifuddin, Maria Lourdes Anzola Pena, Shopnil Prasla, Ling Ho, Lin Lu, Joseph Kung, Evan McNabb, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Danny Vesprini, Hanbo Chen, Irene Karam, Hany Soliman, Ewa Szumacher, Edward Chow, Sonal Gandhi, Maureen Trudeau, Belinda Curpen, Greg J Stanisz, Michael Kolios, Gregory J Czarnota

Background: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer.

Methods and findings: This prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitation

背景:临床前研究表明,放疗与聚焦超声刺激微泡(FUS-MB)治疗相结合,可将肿瘤细胞的死亡率提高 10 到 40 倍。微气泡(血管内气体微球)在靶体积内的声学暴露会导致气泡空化,从而引起肿瘤血管的扰动,激活内皮细胞凋亡通路,从而产生立体定向体放射治疗的烧蚀效应。随后对微气泡敏感的肿瘤进行照射会迅速增加肿瘤的死亡。本研究介绍了磁共振(MR)引导的FUS-MB(MRgFUS-MB)治疗--一种乳腺癌放射增强疗法--的成熟安全性和疗效结果:这项前瞻性、单中心、单臂 1 期临床试验纳入了经多学科团队(clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT04431674)认定可接受乳腺或胸壁放疗的 I-IV 期原位癌患者。如果患者有造影剂增强磁共振或微气泡用药禁忌症,则排除在外。患者在整个放疗过程中接受了 2 到 3 次 MRgFUS-MB 治疗。磁共振耦合聚焦超声设备的工作频率为 800 kHz,峰值负压为 570 kPa,用于在磁共振引导的靶体积内超声注射静脉注射的微泡。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)v5.0,主要结果是急性毒性。次要结果是 3 个月时的肿瘤反应和局部控制(LC)。2020年8月至2022年11月期间,共有21名患有23种原发性乳腺肿瘤的女性患者登记并被分配接受干预治疗。三名患者随后撤回了同意书,因此有18名患者的20个肿瘤被纳入安全性和LC分析。两名患者在治疗结束后 3 个月内因转移性疾病进展而死亡,因此未纳入肿瘤反应分析。规定的放射剂量为20 Gy/5次(40%,n=8/20)、30至35 Gy/5次(35%,n=7/20)、30至40 Gy/10次(15%,n=3/20)和66 Gy/33次(10%,n=2/20)。中位随访时间为 9 个月(0.3 至 29 个月)。放射性皮炎是最常见的急性毒性(16/20 例为 1 级,1/20 例为 2 级,2/20 例为 3 级)。一名患者出现 1 级过敏反应,可能与使用微气泡有关。3 个月后,对 18 个肿瘤进行了反应评估:9例完全应答(50%,n=9/18),6例部分应答(33%,n=6/18),2例病情稳定(11%,n=2/18),1例病情进展(6%,n=1/18)。对反应的进一步随访表明,6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月的 LC 率分别为 94%(95% 置信区间 [CI] [84%, 100%] )、88%(95% CI [75%, 100%] )和 76%(95% CI [54%, 100%] )。该研究的局限性包括肿瘤大小和剂量分馏方案不一,以及预计样本量较小,这在一期临床试验中很典型:MRgFUS-MB是一种创新的放射增强疗法,具有安全的特点、潜在的良好反应和持久的LC。这些结果值得在2期临床试验中进行验证。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov,标识符NCT04431674。
{"title":"Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial.","authors":"Daniel Moore-Palhares, Archya Dasgupta, Murtuza Saifuddin, Maria Lourdes Anzola Pena, Shopnil Prasla, Ling Ho, Lin Lu, Joseph Kung, Evan McNabb, Lakshmanan Sannachi, Danny Vesprini, Hanbo Chen, Irene Karam, Hany Soliman, Ewa Szumacher, Edward Chow, Sonal Gandhi, Maureen Trudeau, Belinda Curpen, Greg J Stanisz, Michael Kolios, Gregory J Czarnota","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitation","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global, regional, and national burden of heatwave-related mortality from 1990 to 2019: A three-stage modelling study. 1990 至 2019 年全球、地区和国家与热浪相关的死亡率负担:三阶段模型研究。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-14 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004364
Qi Zhao, Shanshan Li, Tingting Ye, Yao Wu, Antonio Gasparrini, Shilu Tong, Aleš Urban, Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera, Aurelio Tobias, Ben Armstrong, Dominic Royé, Eric Lavigne, Francesca de'Donato, Francesco Sera, Haidong Kan, Joel Schwartz, Mathilde Pascal, Niilo Ryti, Patrick Goodman, Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva, Michelle L Bell, Yuming Guo

Background: The regional disparity of heatwave-related mortality over a long period has not been sufficiently assessed across the globe, impeding the localisation of adaptation planning and risk management towards climate change. We quantified the global mortality burden associated with heatwaves at a spatial resolution of 0.5°×0.5° and the temporal change from 1990 to 2019.

Methods and findings: We collected data on daily deaths and temperature from 750 locations of 43 countries or regions, and 5 meta-predictors in 0.5°×0.5° resolution across the world. Heatwaves were defined as location-specific daily mean temperature ≥95th percentiles of year-round temperature range with duration ≥2 days. We first estimated the location-specific heatwave-mortality association. Secondly, a multivariate meta-regression was fitted between location-specific associations and 5 meta-predictors, which was in the third stage used with grid cell-specific meta-predictors to predict grid cell-specific association. Heatwave-related excess deaths were calculated for each grid and aggregated. During 1990 to 2019, 0.94% (95% CI: 0.68-1.19) of deaths [i.e., 153,078 cases (95% eCI: 109,950-194,227)] per warm season were estimated to be from heatwaves, accounting for 236 (95% eCI: 170-300) deaths per 10 million residents. The ratio between heatwave-related excess deaths and all premature deaths per warm season remained relatively unchanged over the 30 years, while the number of heatwave-related excess deaths per 10 million residents per warm season declined by 7.2% per decade in comparison to the 30-year average. Locations with the highest heatwave-related death ratio and rate were in Southern and Eastern Europe or areas had polar and alpine climates, and/or their residents had high incomes. The temporal change of heatwave-related mortality burden showed geographic disparities, such that locations with tropical climate or low incomes were observed with the greatest decline. The main limitation of this study was the lack of data from certain regions, e.g., Arabian Peninsula and South Asia.

Conclusions: Heatwaves were associated with substantial mortality burden that varied spatiotemporally over the globe in the past 30 years. The findings indicate the potential benefit of governmental actions to enhance health sector adaptation and resilience, accounting for inequalities across communities.

背景:长期以来,全球范围内与热浪相关的死亡率的地区差异尚未得到充分评估,这阻碍了针对气候变化的适应规划和风险管理的本地化。我们以 0.5°×0.5° 的空间分辨率量化了与热浪相关的全球死亡率负担,以及从 1990 年到 2019 年的时间变化:我们收集了全球 43 个国家或地区 750 个地点的日死亡人数和气温数据,以及 5 个 0.5°×0.5° 分辨率的元预测因子。热浪的定义是特定地点的日平均气温≥全年气温范围的第 95 百分位数,且持续时间≥2 天。我们首先估算了特定地点热浪与死亡率的关系。其次,在特定地点相关性和 5 个元预测因子之间建立多元元回归,并在第三阶段与特定网格单元的元预测因子一起用于预测特定网格单元的相关性。计算出每个网格与热浪相关的超额死亡人数并进行汇总。据估计,在 1990 年至 2019 年期间,每个温暖季节有 0.94% (95% CI:0.68-1.19)的死亡病例[即 153,078 例(95% eCI:109,950-194,227)]死于热浪,即每 1,000 万居民中有 236 例(95% eCI:170-300)死亡病例。在这30年中,每个温暖季节与热浪相关的超额死亡人数与所有过早死亡人数之间的比率保持相对不变,而与30年平均水平相比,每个温暖季节每1000万居民中与热浪相关的超额死亡人数每十年下降了7.2%。与热浪相关的死亡率最高的地区位于南欧和东欧,或者是极地和高山气候地区,以及/或其居民收入较高的地区。与热浪相关的死亡负担的时间变化显示出地域差异,热带气候或低收入地区的下降幅度最大。这项研究的主要局限性在于缺乏某些地区的数据,如阿拉伯半岛和南亚:结论:在过去 30 年中,热浪与全球不同时空的大量死亡相关联。研究结果表明,考虑到各社区之间的不平等,政府采取行动加强卫生部门的适应性和复原力可能会带来益处。
{"title":"Global, regional, and national burden of heatwave-related mortality from 1990 to 2019: A three-stage modelling study.","authors":"Qi Zhao, Shanshan Li, Tingting Ye, Yao Wu, Antonio Gasparrini, Shilu Tong, Aleš Urban, Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera, Aurelio Tobias, Ben Armstrong, Dominic Royé, Eric Lavigne, Francesca de'Donato, Francesco Sera, Haidong Kan, Joel Schwartz, Mathilde Pascal, Niilo Ryti, Patrick Goodman, Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva, Michelle L Bell, Yuming Guo","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004364","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The regional disparity of heatwave-related mortality over a long period has not been sufficiently assessed across the globe, impeding the localisation of adaptation planning and risk management towards climate change. We quantified the global mortality burden associated with heatwaves at a spatial resolution of 0.5°×0.5° and the temporal change from 1990 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We collected data on daily deaths and temperature from 750 locations of 43 countries or regions, and 5 meta-predictors in 0.5°×0.5° resolution across the world. Heatwaves were defined as location-specific daily mean temperature ≥95th percentiles of year-round temperature range with duration ≥2 days. We first estimated the location-specific heatwave-mortality association. Secondly, a multivariate meta-regression was fitted between location-specific associations and 5 meta-predictors, which was in the third stage used with grid cell-specific meta-predictors to predict grid cell-specific association. Heatwave-related excess deaths were calculated for each grid and aggregated. During 1990 to 2019, 0.94% (95% CI: 0.68-1.19) of deaths [i.e., 153,078 cases (95% eCI: 109,950-194,227)] per warm season were estimated to be from heatwaves, accounting for 236 (95% eCI: 170-300) deaths per 10 million residents. The ratio between heatwave-related excess deaths and all premature deaths per warm season remained relatively unchanged over the 30 years, while the number of heatwave-related excess deaths per 10 million residents per warm season declined by 7.2% per decade in comparison to the 30-year average. Locations with the highest heatwave-related death ratio and rate were in Southern and Eastern Europe or areas had polar and alpine climates, and/or their residents had high incomes. The temporal change of heatwave-related mortality burden showed geographic disparities, such that locations with tropical climate or low incomes were observed with the greatest decline. The main limitation of this study was the lack of data from certain regions, e.g., Arabian Peninsula and South Asia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heatwaves were associated with substantial mortality burden that varied spatiotemporally over the globe in the past 30 years. The findings indicate the potential benefit of governmental actions to enhance health sector adaptation and resilience, accounting for inequalities across communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140923302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
User-defined outcomes of the Danish cardiovascular screening (DANCAVAS) trial: A post hoc analyses of a population-based, randomised controlled trial. 丹麦心血管筛查(DANCAVAS)试验的用户定义结果:基于人口的随机对照试验的事后分析。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-13 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004403
Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Anna Mejldal, Rikke Søgaard, Jesper Hallas, Jess Lambrechtsen, Flemming Hald Steffensen, Lars Frost, Kenneth Egstrup, Martin Busk, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Marek Karon, Lars Melholt Rasmussen, Jes Sanddal Lindholt

Background: The Danish cardiovascular screening (DANCAVAS) trial, a nationwide trial designed to investigate the impact of cardiovascular screening in men, did not decrease all-cause mortality, an outcome decided by the investigators. However, the target group may have varied preferences. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether men aged 65 to 74 years requested a CT-based cardiovascular screening examination and to assess its impact on outcomes determined by their preferences.

Methods and findings: This is a post hoc study of the randomised DANCAVAS trial. All men 65 to 74 years of age residing in specific areas of Denmark were randomised (1:2) to invitation-to-screening (16,736 men, of which 10,471 underwent screening) or usual-care (29,790 men). The examination included among others a non-contrast CT scan (to assess the coronary artery calcium score and aortic aneurysms). Positive findings prompted preventive treatment with atorvastatin, aspirin, and surveillance/surgical evaluation. The usual-care group remained unaware of the trial and the assignments. The user-defined outcome was based on patient preferences and determined through a survey sent in January 2023 to a random sample of 9,095 men from the target group, with a 68.0% response rate (6,182 respondents). Safety outcomes included severe bleeding and mortality within 30 days after cardiovascular surgery. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-screen basis. Prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction was the primary motivation for participating in the screening examination. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 1,800 of 16,736 men (10.8%) in the invited-to-screening group and 3,420 of 29,790 (11.5%) in the usual-care group experienced an event (hazard ratio (HR), 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88 to 0.98; p = 0.010); number needed to invite at 6 years, 148 (95% CI, 80 to 986)). A total of 324 men (1.9%) in the invited-to-screening group and 491 (1.7%) in the usual-care group had an intracranial bleeding (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.35; p = 0.029). Additionally, 994 (5.9%) in the invited-to-screening group and 1,722 (5.8%) in the usual-care group experienced severe gastrointestinal bleeding (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.11; p = 0.583). No differences were found in mortality after cardiovascular surgery. The primary limitation of the study is that exclusive enrolment of men aged 65 to 74 renders the findings non-generalisable to women or men of other age groups.

Conclusion: In this comprehensive population-based cardiovascular screening and intervention program, we observed a reduction in the user-defined outcome, stroke and myocardial infarction, but entail a small increased risk of intracranial bleeding.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN12157806 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12157806.

背景:丹麦心血管筛查(DANCAVAS)试验是一项全国性试验,旨在调查心血管筛查对男性的影响,该试验并未降低全因死亡率,这是由研究者决定的结果。然而,目标群体可能有不同的偏好。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估 65 至 74 岁的男性是否要求进行基于 CT 的心血管筛查,并评估其对由其偏好决定的结果的影响:这是对 DANCAVAS 随机试验的一项事后研究。居住在丹麦特定地区的所有 65 至 74 岁男性被随机(1:2)邀请接受筛查(16736 名男性,其中 10471 名接受了筛查)或常规护理(29790 名男性)。检查内容包括非对比 CT 扫描(评估冠状动脉钙化评分和主动脉瘤)。如果检查结果呈阳性,则需要使用阿托伐他汀、阿司匹林进行预防性治疗,并进行监测/手术评估。常规护理组对试验和任务分配一无所知。用户定义的结果基于患者的偏好,通过 2023 年 1 月向目标群体中的 9095 名男性随机抽样调查确定,回复率为 68.0%(6182 名受访者)。安全性结果包括严重出血和心血管手术后 30 天内的死亡率。分析以意向筛选为基础进行。预防中风和心肌梗死是参加筛查的主要动机。中位随访 6.4 年后,受邀筛查组的 16,736 名男性中有 1,800 名(10.8%)发生了心肌梗死事件,常规护理组的 29,790 名男性中有 3,420 名(11.5%)发生了心肌梗死事件(危险比 (HR),0.93(95% 置信区间 (CI),0.88 至 0.98;P = 0.010);6 年后需要邀请的人数为 148(95% CI,80 至 986))。受邀筛查组共有 324 名男性(1.9%)和常规护理组共有 491 名男性(1.7%)发生过颅内出血(HR,1.17;95% CI,1.02 至 1.35;P = 0.029)。此外,受邀筛查组中有994人(5.9%)和常规护理组中有1722人(5.8%)出现严重消化道出血(HR,1.02;95% CI,0.95至1.11;P = 0.583)。心血管手术后的死亡率没有差异。该研究的主要局限性在于,只招募了65至74岁的男性,因此研究结果不能推广到其他年龄段的女性或男性:结论:在这项全面的人群心血管筛查和干预计划中,我们观察到用户定义的结果、中风和心肌梗死有所减少,但颅内出血的风险略有增加:ISRCTN 注册号:ISRCTN12157806 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12157806。
{"title":"User-defined outcomes of the Danish cardiovascular screening (DANCAVAS) trial: A post hoc analyses of a population-based, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Anna Mejldal, Rikke Søgaard, Jesper Hallas, Jess Lambrechtsen, Flemming Hald Steffensen, Lars Frost, Kenneth Egstrup, Martin Busk, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Marek Karon, Lars Melholt Rasmussen, Jes Sanddal Lindholt","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004403","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Danish cardiovascular screening (DANCAVAS) trial, a nationwide trial designed to investigate the impact of cardiovascular screening in men, did not decrease all-cause mortality, an outcome decided by the investigators. However, the target group may have varied preferences. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether men aged 65 to 74 years requested a CT-based cardiovascular screening examination and to assess its impact on outcomes determined by their preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This is a post hoc study of the randomised DANCAVAS trial. All men 65 to 74 years of age residing in specific areas of Denmark were randomised (1:2) to invitation-to-screening (16,736 men, of which 10,471 underwent screening) or usual-care (29,790 men). The examination included among others a non-contrast CT scan (to assess the coronary artery calcium score and aortic aneurysms). Positive findings prompted preventive treatment with atorvastatin, aspirin, and surveillance/surgical evaluation. The usual-care group remained unaware of the trial and the assignments. The user-defined outcome was based on patient preferences and determined through a survey sent in January 2023 to a random sample of 9,095 men from the target group, with a 68.0% response rate (6,182 respondents). Safety outcomes included severe bleeding and mortality within 30 days after cardiovascular surgery. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-screen basis. Prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction was the primary motivation for participating in the screening examination. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 1,800 of 16,736 men (10.8%) in the invited-to-screening group and 3,420 of 29,790 (11.5%) in the usual-care group experienced an event (hazard ratio (HR), 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88 to 0.98; p = 0.010); number needed to invite at 6 years, 148 (95% CI, 80 to 986)). A total of 324 men (1.9%) in the invited-to-screening group and 491 (1.7%) in the usual-care group had an intracranial bleeding (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.35; p = 0.029). Additionally, 994 (5.9%) in the invited-to-screening group and 1,722 (5.8%) in the usual-care group experienced severe gastrointestinal bleeding (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.11; p = 0.583). No differences were found in mortality after cardiovascular surgery. The primary limitation of the study is that exclusive enrolment of men aged 65 to 74 renders the findings non-generalisable to women or men of other age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comprehensive population-based cardiovascular screening and intervention program, we observed a reduction in the user-defined outcome, stroke and myocardial infarction, but entail a small increased risk of intracranial bleeding.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN12157806 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12157806.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132442/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI versus cetuximab plus FOLFOX as conversion regimen in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (TRICE trial): A randomized controlled trial. 西妥昔单抗联合 FOLFOXIRI 与西妥昔单抗联合 FOLFOX 作为 RAS/BRAF 野生型结直肠肝转移瘤患者的转换方案(TRICE 试验):随机对照试验。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-10 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004389
De-Shen Wang, Chao Ren, Shan-Shan Li, William Pat Fong, Xiao-Jun Wu, Jian Xiao, Bin-Kui Li, Yun Zheng, Pei-Rong Ding, Gong Chen, Miao-Zhen Qiu, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Feng-Hua Wang, Hui-Yan Luo, Feng Wang, Xiao-Zhong Wang, Ling-Yun Wang, De-Jin Xie, Tao Chen, Li-Ren Li, Zhen-Hai Lu, Xiao-Hui Zhai, Tian-Shu Liu, Ying Yuan, Jia-Qi Chen, Qiong Tan, Zhi-Zhong Pan, De-Sen Wan, Rong Zhang, Yun-Fei Yuan, Rui-Hua Xu, Yu-Hong Li

Background: It remains unclear whether intensification of the chemotherapy backbone in tandem with an anti-EGFR can confer superior clinical outcomes in a cohort of RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To that end, we sought to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI (triplet arm) versus cetuximab plus FOLFOX (doublet arm) as a conversion regimen (i.e., unresectable to resectable) in CRC patients with unresectable CRLM.

Methods and findings: This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2018 to December 2022 in 7 medical centers across China, enrolling 146 RAS/BRAF wild-type CRC patients with initially unresectable CRLM. A stratified blocked randomization method was utilized to assign patients (1:1) to either the cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI (n = 72) or cetuximab plus FOLFOX (n = 74) treatment arms. Stratification factors were tumor location (left versus right) and resectability (technically unresectable versus ≥5 metastases). The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes included the median depth of tumor response (DpR), early tumor shrinkage (ETS), R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (not mature at the time of analysis), and safety profile. Radiological tumor evaluations were conducted by radiologists blinded to the group allocation. Primary efficacy analyses were conducted based on the intention-to-treat population, while safety analyses were performed on patients who received at least 1 line of chemotherapy. A total of 14 patients (9.6%) were lost to follow-up (9 in the doublet arm and 5 in the triplet arm). The ORR was comparable following adjustment for stratification factors, with 84.7% versus 79.7% in the triplet and doublet arms, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.30, 1.67], Chi-square p = 0.42). Moreover, the ETS rate showed no significant difference between the triplet and doublet arms (80.6% (58/72) versus 77.0% (57/74), OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.37, 1.83], Chi-square p = 0.63). Although median DpR was higher in the triplet therapy group (59.6%, interquartile range [IQR], [50.0, 69.7] versus 55.0%, IQR [42.8, 63.8], Mann-Whitney p = 0.039), the R0/R1 resection rate with or without radiofrequency ablation/stereotactic body radiation therapy was comparable with 54.2% (39/72) of patients in the triplet arm versus 52.7% (39/74) in the doublet arm. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months (IQR [12.8, 40.5]), the median PFS was 11.8 months in the triplet arm versus 13.4 months in the doublet arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI [0.50, 1.11], Log-rank p = 0.14). Grade ≥ 3 events were reported in 47.2% (35/74) of patients in the doublet arm and 55.9% (38/68) of patients in the triplet arm. The triplet arm was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (44.1% versus 27.

背景:对于RAS/BRAF野生型结直肠癌(CRC)患者中最初无法切除的结直肠肝转移灶(CRLM),化疗骨架的强化与抗EGFR的联合应用是否能带来更好的临床疗效,目前仍不清楚。为此,我们试图比较评估西妥昔单抗加 FOLFOXIRI(三联)与西妥昔单抗加 FOLFOX(双联)作为不可切除 CRLM 的 CRC 患者转换方案(即不可切除到可切除)的疗效和安全性:这项开放标签、随机临床试验于2018年4月至2022年12月在全国7个医疗中心开展,共招募了146例RAS/BRAF野生型CRC患者,这些患者最初均为不可切除的CRLM。采用分层阻断随机方法将患者(1:1)分配到西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOXIRI(n = 72)或西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX(n = 74)治疗组。分层因素为肿瘤位置(左侧与右侧)和可切除性(技术上不可切除与≥5个转移灶)。主要结果是客观反应率(ORR)。次要结果包括中位肿瘤反应深度(DpR)、早期肿瘤缩小(ETS)、R0切除率、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(分析时尚未成熟)和安全性。肿瘤放射学评估由放射科医生进行,并对组别分配设置盲区。主要疗效分析根据意向治疗人群进行,而安全性分析则针对至少接受过一次化疗的患者。共有14名患者(9.6%)失去了随访机会(双联治疗组9人,三联治疗组5人)。调整分层因素后,三联化疗组和双联化疗组的 ORR 相当,分别为 84.7% 和 79.7%(几率比 [OR] 0.70;95% 置信区间 [CI] [0.30, 1.67],卡方 p = 0.42)。此外,三联组和双联组的 ETS 率没有明显差异(80.6%(58/72)对 77.0%(57/74),OR 0.82,95% CI [0.37,1.83],卡方 p = 0.63)。虽然三联疗法组的中位 DpR 较高(59.6%,四分位数间距 [IQR],[50.0,69.7] 对 55.0%,IQR [42.8,63.8],Mann-Whitney p = 0.039),但无论是否采用射频消融/立体定向体放射治疗,三联疗法组患者的 R0/R1 切除率都相当,三联疗法组为 54.2%(39/72),而双联疗法组为 52.7%(39/74)。在中位随访 26.2 个月(IQR [12.8, 40.5])时,三联组的中位 PFS 为 11.8 个月,而双联组为 13.4 个月(危险比 [HR] 0.74,95% CI [0.50, 1.11],Log-rank p = 0.14)。双联治疗组中有 47.2% 的患者(35/74)发生了≥3 级事件,三联治疗组中有 55.9% 的患者(38/68)发生了≥3 级事件。三联疗法组≥3级中性粒细胞减少(44.1%对27.0%,P = 0.03)和腹泻(5.9%对0%,P = 0.03)的发生率较高。该研究的主要局限性包括主观手术决定切除可行性的固有偏差,以及缺乏对ORR和切除的集中评估:结论:与西妥昔单抗加 FOLFOXIRI 相比,西妥昔单抗加 FOLFOXIRI 并未显著提高 ORR。尽管DpR有所提高,但这种提高并没有转化为R0切除率或PFS的改善。此外,三联疗法还增加了治疗相关毒性:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03493048。
{"title":"Cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI versus cetuximab plus FOLFOX as conversion regimen in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (TRICE trial): A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"De-Shen Wang, Chao Ren, Shan-Shan Li, William Pat Fong, Xiao-Jun Wu, Jian Xiao, Bin-Kui Li, Yun Zheng, Pei-Rong Ding, Gong Chen, Miao-Zhen Qiu, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Feng-Hua Wang, Hui-Yan Luo, Feng Wang, Xiao-Zhong Wang, Ling-Yun Wang, De-Jin Xie, Tao Chen, Li-Ren Li, Zhen-Hai Lu, Xiao-Hui Zhai, Tian-Shu Liu, Ying Yuan, Jia-Qi Chen, Qiong Tan, Zhi-Zhong Pan, De-Sen Wan, Rong Zhang, Yun-Fei Yuan, Rui-Hua Xu, Yu-Hong Li","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004389","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It remains unclear whether intensification of the chemotherapy backbone in tandem with an anti-EGFR can confer superior clinical outcomes in a cohort of RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To that end, we sought to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI (triplet arm) versus cetuximab plus FOLFOX (doublet arm) as a conversion regimen (i.e., unresectable to resectable) in CRC patients with unresectable CRLM.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2018 to December 2022 in 7 medical centers across China, enrolling 146 RAS/BRAF wild-type CRC patients with initially unresectable CRLM. A stratified blocked randomization method was utilized to assign patients (1:1) to either the cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI (n = 72) or cetuximab plus FOLFOX (n = 74) treatment arms. Stratification factors were tumor location (left versus right) and resectability (technically unresectable versus ≥5 metastases). The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes included the median depth of tumor response (DpR), early tumor shrinkage (ETS), R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (not mature at the time of analysis), and safety profile. Radiological tumor evaluations were conducted by radiologists blinded to the group allocation. Primary efficacy analyses were conducted based on the intention-to-treat population, while safety analyses were performed on patients who received at least 1 line of chemotherapy. A total of 14 patients (9.6%) were lost to follow-up (9 in the doublet arm and 5 in the triplet arm). The ORR was comparable following adjustment for stratification factors, with 84.7% versus 79.7% in the triplet and doublet arms, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.30, 1.67], Chi-square p = 0.42). Moreover, the ETS rate showed no significant difference between the triplet and doublet arms (80.6% (58/72) versus 77.0% (57/74), OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.37, 1.83], Chi-square p = 0.63). Although median DpR was higher in the triplet therapy group (59.6%, interquartile range [IQR], [50.0, 69.7] versus 55.0%, IQR [42.8, 63.8], Mann-Whitney p = 0.039), the R0/R1 resection rate with or without radiofrequency ablation/stereotactic body radiation therapy was comparable with 54.2% (39/72) of patients in the triplet arm versus 52.7% (39/74) in the doublet arm. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months (IQR [12.8, 40.5]), the median PFS was 11.8 months in the triplet arm versus 13.4 months in the doublet arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI [0.50, 1.11], Log-rank p = 0.14). Grade ≥ 3 events were reported in 47.2% (35/74) of patients in the doublet arm and 55.9% (38/68) of patients in the triplet arm. The triplet arm was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (44.1% versus 27.","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086847/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140904897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case-area targeted interventions during a large-scale cholera epidemic: A prospective cohort study in Northeast Nigeria. 大规模霍乱疫情期间的病例区定向干预:尼日利亚东北部的前瞻性队列研究。
IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-10 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004404
Jennifer OKeeffe, Lindsay Salem-Bango, Michael R Desjardins, Daniele Lantagne, Chiara Altare, Gurpreet Kaur, Thomas Heath, Kanaganathan Rangaiya, Patricia Oke-Oghene Obroh, Ahmadu Audu, Baptiste Lecuyot, Timothée Zoungrana, Emmanuel Emeka Ihemezue, Solomon Aye, Mustafa Sikder, Shannon Doocy, Qiulin Wang, Melody Xiao, Paul B Spiegel

Background: Cholera outbreaks are on the rise globally, with conflict-affected settings particularly at risk. Case-area targeted interventions (CATIs), a strategy whereby teams provide a package of interventions to case and neighboring households within a predefined "ring," are increasingly employed in cholera responses. However, evidence on their ability to attenuate incidence is limited.

Methods and findings: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in 3 conflict-affected states in Nigeria in 2021. Enumerators within rapid response teams observed CATI implementation during a cholera outbreak and collected data on household demographics; existing water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure; and CATI interventions. Descriptive statistics showed that CATIs were delivered to 46,864 case and neighbor households, with 80.0% of cases and 33.5% of neighbors receiving all intended supplies and activities, in a context with operational challenges of population density, supply stock outs, and security constraints. We then applied prospective Poisson space-time scan statistics (STSS) across 3 models for each state: (1) an unadjusted model with case and population data; (2) an environmentally adjusted model adjusting for distance to cholera treatment centers and existing WASH infrastructure (improved water source, improved latrine, and handwashing station); and (3) a fully adjusted model adjusting for environmental and CATI variables (supply of Aquatabs and soap, hygiene promotion, bedding and latrine disinfection activities, ring coverage, and response timeliness). We ran the STSS each day of our study period to evaluate the space-time dynamics of the cholera outbreaks. Compared to the unadjusted model, significant cholera clustering was attenuated in the environmentally adjusted model (from 572 to 18 clusters) but there was still risk of cholera transmission. Two states still yielded significant clusters (range 8-10 total clusters, relative risk of 2.2-5.5, 16.6-19.9 day duration, including 11.1-56.8 cholera cases). Cholera clustering was completely attenuated in the fully adjusted model, with no significant anomalous clusters across time and space. Associated measures including quantity, relative risk, significance, likelihood of recurrence, size, and duration of clusters reinforced the results. Key limitations include selection bias, remote data monitoring, and the lack of a control group.

Conclusions: CATIs were associated with significant reductions in cholera clustering in Northeast Nigeria despite operational challenges. Our results provide a strong justification for rapid implementation and scale-up CATIs in cholera-response, particularly in conflict settings where WASH access is often limited.

背景:霍乱疫情在全球范围内呈上升趋势,受冲突影响地区的风险尤其大。病例区定向干预(CATIs)是一种策略,由团队在预先确定的 "圈 "内向病例家庭和邻近家庭提供一揽子干预措施,这种策略在霍乱应对措施中越来越多地被采用。然而,有关这些措施能否降低发病率的证据却很有限:2021 年,我们在尼日利亚 3 个受冲突影响的州开展了一项前瞻性观察队列研究。快速反应小组的调查员在霍乱爆发期间观察了 CATI 的实施情况,并收集了有关家庭人口统计、现有水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)基础设施以及 CATI 干预措施的数据。描述性统计数字显示,CATI 共向 46864 个病例家庭和邻里家庭提供了服务,其中 80.0% 的病例家庭和 33.5% 的邻里家庭获得了所有预期的物资和活动,但在实际操作中却面临着人口密度大、物资短缺和安全限制等挑战。然后,我们在每个州的 3 个模型中应用了前瞻性泊松时空扫描统计(STSS):(1) 包含病例和人口数据的未调整模型;(2) 根据霍乱治疗中心和现有讲卫生运动基础设施(改良水源、改良厕所和洗手站)的距离进行调整的环境调整模型;(3) 根据环境和 CATI 变量(Aquatabs 和肥皂供应、卫生宣传、床上用品和厕所消毒活动、环覆盖率和响应及时性)进行调整的完全调整模型。我们在研究期间每天运行 STSS,以评估霍乱爆发的时空动态。与未经调整的模型相比,在环境调整模型中,显著的霍乱集群现象有所减少(从 572 个集群减少到 18 个),但仍存在霍乱传播的风险。有两个州仍有明显的集群(总集群范围为 8-10 个,相对风险为 2.2-5.5,持续时间为 16.6-19.9 天,包括 11.1-56.8 个霍乱病例)。在完全调整模型中,霍乱集群完全减弱,在时间和空间上都没有明显的异常集群。集群的数量、相对风险、显著性、复发可能性、规模和持续时间等相关指标都加强了这一结果。主要局限性包括选择偏差、远程数据监控和缺乏对照组:尽管在操作上存在挑战,但 CATI 与尼日利亚东北部霍乱集群的显著减少有关。我们的研究结果为在霍乱应对工作中快速实施和推广 CATI 提供了有力的依据,尤其是在讲卫生运动常常受到限制的冲突环境中。
{"title":"Case-area targeted interventions during a large-scale cholera epidemic: A prospective cohort study in Northeast Nigeria.","authors":"Jennifer OKeeffe, Lindsay Salem-Bango, Michael R Desjardins, Daniele Lantagne, Chiara Altare, Gurpreet Kaur, Thomas Heath, Kanaganathan Rangaiya, Patricia Oke-Oghene Obroh, Ahmadu Audu, Baptiste Lecuyot, Timothée Zoungrana, Emmanuel Emeka Ihemezue, Solomon Aye, Mustafa Sikder, Shannon Doocy, Qiulin Wang, Melody Xiao, Paul B Spiegel","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004404","DOIUrl":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholera outbreaks are on the rise globally, with conflict-affected settings particularly at risk. Case-area targeted interventions (CATIs), a strategy whereby teams provide a package of interventions to case and neighboring households within a predefined \"ring,\" are increasingly employed in cholera responses. However, evidence on their ability to attenuate incidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in 3 conflict-affected states in Nigeria in 2021. Enumerators within rapid response teams observed CATI implementation during a cholera outbreak and collected data on household demographics; existing water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure; and CATI interventions. Descriptive statistics showed that CATIs were delivered to 46,864 case and neighbor households, with 80.0% of cases and 33.5% of neighbors receiving all intended supplies and activities, in a context with operational challenges of population density, supply stock outs, and security constraints. We then applied prospective Poisson space-time scan statistics (STSS) across 3 models for each state: (1) an unadjusted model with case and population data; (2) an environmentally adjusted model adjusting for distance to cholera treatment centers and existing WASH infrastructure (improved water source, improved latrine, and handwashing station); and (3) a fully adjusted model adjusting for environmental and CATI variables (supply of Aquatabs and soap, hygiene promotion, bedding and latrine disinfection activities, ring coverage, and response timeliness). We ran the STSS each day of our study period to evaluate the space-time dynamics of the cholera outbreaks. Compared to the unadjusted model, significant cholera clustering was attenuated in the environmentally adjusted model (from 572 to 18 clusters) but there was still risk of cholera transmission. Two states still yielded significant clusters (range 8-10 total clusters, relative risk of 2.2-5.5, 16.6-19.9 day duration, including 11.1-56.8 cholera cases). Cholera clustering was completely attenuated in the fully adjusted model, with no significant anomalous clusters across time and space. Associated measures including quantity, relative risk, significance, likelihood of recurrence, size, and duration of clusters reinforced the results. Key limitations include selection bias, remote data monitoring, and the lack of a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CATIs were associated with significant reductions in cholera clustering in Northeast Nigeria despite operational challenges. Our results provide a strong justification for rapid implementation and scale-up CATIs in cholera-response, particularly in conflict settings where WASH access is often limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140904868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
PLoS Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1