首页 > 最新文献

Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica最新文献

英文 中文
The timing of initial imaging in testicular cancer: impact on radiological findings and clinical decision making. 睾丸癌初始影像的时机:对放射学表现和临床决策的影响。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03877-1
R. Dotzauer, A. Salamat, N. D. Nabar, A. Thomas, K. Böhm, M. Brandt, R. Mager, H. Borgmann, M. Kurosch, T. Hoefner, I. Tsaur, A. Hötker, A. Haferkamp, W. Jäger
BACKGROUNDIn testicular cancer determination of clinical stage and recommendation of therapeutic strategy after inguinal orchiectomy are based on primary imaging by CT-scan of the chest and CT- or MRI- abdomen. It has not been investigated so far, whether the imaging should be performed before or after primary testicular surgery. Staging before surgery means exposing all patients to CT radiation irrespective of ensured histologic malignancy while postoperative staging could pose a risk in biased clinical decision making by increased presence of unspecific lymph node enlargement caused by postsurgical effects. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the timing of initial staging and occurrence of unspecific lymph node enlargement and adjuvant therapies after inguinal orchiectomy.METHODSWe retrospectively evaluated clinical and radiological data from 236 patients who had undergone inguinal orchiectomy for testicular cancer at our department. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether the occurrence of unspecific lymph node enlargement or the rate of adjuvant therapies were influenced by timing of initial staging (preoperative vs. postoperative).RESULTSThe postoperative imaging cohort showed significant more inguinal, pelvic and retroperitoneal unspecific lymph node enlargement than the preoperative imaging cohort. Simultaneous occurrence of inguinal or pelvic lymph node enlargement together with retroperitoneal enlargements could only be found in the postoperative imaging cohort. No difference regarding adjuvant therapies could be found.CONCLUSIONSTiming of imaging affects the detection rate of unspecific lymph node enlargements but does not show a significant effect on the rate of adjuvant therapies.
背景:在睾丸癌中,腹股沟睾丸切除术后临床分期的确定和治疗策略的推荐是基于胸部CT扫描和腹部CT或MRI的初步影像。影像学检查是否应在原发性睾丸手术前或手术后进行,目前尚无研究。术前分期意味着将所有患者暴露于CT辐射下,而不考虑其组织学上的恶性程度,而术后分期可能会因术后影响导致的非特异性淋巴结肿大增加而增加临床决策的偏倚风险。因此,我们旨在探讨腹股沟睾丸切除术后初始分期和非特异性淋巴结肿大发生的时间与辅助治疗之间的关系。方法回顾性分析本科236例因睾丸癌行腹股沟睾丸切除术患者的临床和影像学资料。通过统计分析确定非特异性淋巴结肿大的发生或辅助治疗的比率是否受到初始分期时间(术前与术后)的影响。结果术后影像学队列显示腹股沟、盆腔和腹膜后非特异性淋巴结肿大明显多于术前影像学队列。腹股沟或盆腔淋巴结肿大与腹膜后肿大的同时发生,只能在术后影像学队列中发现。在辅助治疗方面没有发现差异。结论造影时机对非特异性淋巴结肿大的检出率有影响,但对辅助治疗率无显著影响。
{"title":"The timing of initial imaging in testicular cancer: impact on radiological findings and clinical decision making.","authors":"R. Dotzauer, A. Salamat, N. D. Nabar, A. Thomas, K. Böhm, M. Brandt, R. Mager, H. Borgmann, M. Kurosch, T. Hoefner, I. Tsaur, A. Hötker, A. Haferkamp, W. Jäger","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03877-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03877-1","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000In testicular cancer determination of clinical stage and recommendation of therapeutic strategy after inguinal orchiectomy are based on primary imaging by CT-scan of the chest and CT- or MRI- abdomen. It has not been investigated so far, whether the imaging should be performed before or after primary testicular surgery. Staging before surgery means exposing all patients to CT radiation irrespective of ensured histologic malignancy while postoperative staging could pose a risk in biased clinical decision making by increased presence of unspecific lymph node enlargement caused by postsurgical effects. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the timing of initial staging and occurrence of unspecific lymph node enlargement and adjuvant therapies after inguinal orchiectomy.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000We retrospectively evaluated clinical and radiological data from 236 patients who had undergone inguinal orchiectomy for testicular cancer at our department. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether the occurrence of unspecific lymph node enlargement or the rate of adjuvant therapies were influenced by timing of initial staging (preoperative vs. postoperative).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000The postoperative imaging cohort showed significant more inguinal, pelvic and retroperitoneal unspecific lymph node enlargement than the preoperative imaging cohort. Simultaneous occurrence of inguinal or pelvic lymph node enlargement together with retroperitoneal enlargements could only be found in the postoperative imaging cohort. No difference regarding adjuvant therapies could be found.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Timing of imaging affects the detection rate of unspecific lymph node enlargements but does not show a significant effect on the rate of adjuvant therapies.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87723237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The role of RENAL score in predicting complications after robotic partial nephrectomy. 肾评分在预测机器人肾部分切除术后并发症中的作用。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03608-5
J. Daza, K. Okhawere, Olajumoke A. Ige, Amr E. Elbakry, J. Sfakianos, R. Abaza, A. Bhandari, D. Eun, A. Hemal, J. Porter, K. Badani
BACKGROUNDThe aim of this study is to evaluate the association between tumor complexity based on RENAL nephrometry score and complications.METHODSWe retrospectively identified 2555 patients who underwent RPN for renal cell carcinoma. Major complication was defined as clavien grade≥3. The relationship between baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and tumor complexity were assessed using Chi-square test of independence, Fishers exact and Kruskal Wallis test. An unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression model was used to assess the relationship between major complication and demographic, clinical characteristics, and perioperative outcomes.RESULTSThere was a significant relationship between tumor complexity and WIT(p<0.001), operative time(p<0.001), estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and major complication(p=0.019). However, there was no relationship with overall complications(p=0.237) and length of stay (LOS) (p=0.085). In the unadjusted model, higher tumor complexity was associated with major complication (p=0.009). Controlling for other variables, there was no significant difference between major complication and tumor complexity (low vs. moderate, p=0.142 and high, p=0.204). LOS (p <0.001) and operative time (p=0.025) remained a significant predictor of major complication in the adjusted model.CONCLUSIONSTumor complexity is not associated with an increase in overall or major complication rate after RPN. Experience in high-volume centers is demonstrating a standardization of low complications rates after RPN independent of tumor complexity.
本研究的目的是评估基于肾肾测量评分的肿瘤复杂性与并发症之间的关系。方法回顾性分析2555例肾细胞癌行RPN治疗的患者。主要并发症定义为clavien分级≥3级。采用卡方独立性检验、fisher精确检验和Kruskal Wallis检验评估基线人口学、临床特征、围手术期和术后结局与肿瘤复杂性的关系。采用未调整和调整的logistic回归模型评估主要并发症与人口统计学、临床特征和围手术期结局的关系。结果肿瘤复杂性与WIT(p<0.001)、手术时间(p<0.001)、估计失血量(p<0.001)、主要并发症(p=0.019)有显著相关。但与总并发症(p=0.237)和住院时间(LOS) (p=0.085)无关。在未调整的模型中,较高的肿瘤复杂性与主要并发症相关(p=0.009)。在控制其他变量的情况下,主要并发症和肿瘤复杂性的差异无统计学意义(低vs中等,p=0.142,高,p=0.204)。在调整后的模型中,LOS (p <0.001)和手术时间(p=0.025)仍然是主要并发症的重要预测因素。结论肿瘤复杂性与RPN术后总并发症或主要并发症发生率的增加无关。高容量中心的经验表明,RPN术后并发症发生率的标准化与肿瘤复杂性无关。
{"title":"The role of RENAL score in predicting complications after robotic partial nephrectomy.","authors":"J. Daza, K. Okhawere, Olajumoke A. Ige, Amr E. Elbakry, J. Sfakianos, R. Abaza, A. Bhandari, D. Eun, A. Hemal, J. Porter, K. Badani","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03608-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03608-5","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between tumor complexity based on RENAL nephrometry score and complications.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000We retrospectively identified 2555 patients who underwent RPN for renal cell carcinoma. Major complication was defined as clavien grade≥3. The relationship between baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and tumor complexity were assessed using Chi-square test of independence, Fishers exact and Kruskal Wallis test. An unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression model was used to assess the relationship between major complication and demographic, clinical characteristics, and perioperative outcomes.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000There was a significant relationship between tumor complexity and WIT(p<0.001), operative time(p<0.001), estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and major complication(p=0.019). However, there was no relationship with overall complications(p=0.237) and length of stay (LOS) (p=0.085). In the unadjusted model, higher tumor complexity was associated with major complication (p=0.009). Controlling for other variables, there was no significant difference between major complication and tumor complexity (low vs. moderate, p=0.142 and high, p=0.204). LOS (p <0.001) and operative time (p=0.025) remained a significant predictor of major complication in the adjusted model.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Tumor complexity is not associated with an increase in overall or major complication rate after RPN. Experience in high-volume centers is demonstrating a standardization of low complications rates after RPN independent of tumor complexity.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86768309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
External validation of SPARE nephrometery score in predicting overall complications, trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. 外部验证SPARE肾计评分预测机器人辅助部分肾切除术后的总并发症、三影和五影结局。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03972-7
G. Sharma, S. Tyagi, R. Mavuduru, G. Bora, A. Sharma, S. Devana, U. Gorsi, N. Kakkar, S. Singh
BACKGROUNDThere is an ongoing need and search for a simple yet accurate nephrometry scoring system for predicting the postoperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). SPARE, a simplified version of PADUA has been proposed as a predictor of postoperative complications following PN recently. However, this score has never been externally validated and assessed as a predictor of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes of PN. In the current study, we applied the SPARE scoring system to our robot-assisted PN cohort (RAPN).METHODSProspectively maintained data of patients, who underwent RAPN between November 2014 to December 2018, was abstracted. Imaging was analyzed to calculate SPARE and RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) by two Urologists independently. SPARE was compared with complications, trifecta outcomes, pentafecta outcomes, and RENAL nephrometry scoring (RNS).RESULTSData of 201 RAPN patients were analyzed. The mean SPARE score was 3 (range 0-11). 113 patients were classified as low risk, 64 as intermediate risk, and 24 as high risks. On multivariate analysis SPARE score alone predicted complications (OR 1.37, p=0.014) and trifecta outcomes (OR 0.75, p=0.000) while age (OR 0.96, p=0.042), preoperative eGFR (OR 0.97, p=0.001) and SPARE scores (OR 0.81, p=0.016) were predictors for pentafecta outcomes. Receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis between SPARE and RNS in predicting the complications; trifecta and pentafecta outcomes had a comparable area under the curve.CONCLUSIONSOur study validates the SPARE nephrometry scoring system in predicting postoperative complications, trifecta, and pentafecta outcomes in a RAPN cohort. The predictive accuracy of SPARE is similar to RNS.
研究背景:对于预测部分肾切除术(PN)后预后的简单而准确的肾脏测量评分系统的需求和探索一直存在。最近,一种简化版的PADUA被提出作为PN术后并发症的预测指标。然而,该评分从未被外部验证和评估为PN三效和五效结局的预测因子。在当前的研究中,我们将SPARE评分系统应用于我们的机器人辅助PN队列(RAPN)。方法选取2014年11月至2018年12月期间接受RAPN治疗的患者的前瞻性数据。由两名泌尿科医生独立分析影像,计算SPARE和RENAL肾脏测量评分(RNS)。比较SPARE的并发症、三效结局、五效结局和肾肾测量评分(RNS)。结果对201例RAPN患者资料进行分析。平均SPARE评分为3分(范围0-11)。113例为低危,64例为中危,24例为高危。在多因素分析中,单独的SPARE评分预测并发症(OR 1.37, p=0.014)和三联体结局(OR 0.75, p=0.000),而年龄(OR 0.96, p=0.042)、术前eGFR (OR 0.97, p=0.001)和SPARE评分(OR 0.81, p=0.016)是五联体结局的预测因子。SPARE与RNS预测并发症的ROC分析三效组和五效组的结果曲线下面积相当。我们的研究验证了SPARE肾测量评分系统在预测RAPN队列术后并发症、三联体和五联体结局方面的作用。SPARE的预测精度与RNS相似。
{"title":"External validation of SPARE nephrometery score in predicting overall complications, trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.","authors":"G. Sharma, S. Tyagi, R. Mavuduru, G. Bora, A. Sharma, S. Devana, U. Gorsi, N. Kakkar, S. Singh","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03972-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03972-7","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000There is an ongoing need and search for a simple yet accurate nephrometry scoring system for predicting the postoperative outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). SPARE, a simplified version of PADUA has been proposed as a predictor of postoperative complications following PN recently. However, this score has never been externally validated and assessed as a predictor of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes of PN. In the current study, we applied the SPARE scoring system to our robot-assisted PN cohort (RAPN).\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000Prospectively maintained data of patients, who underwent RAPN between November 2014 to December 2018, was abstracted. Imaging was analyzed to calculate SPARE and RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) by two Urologists independently. SPARE was compared with complications, trifecta outcomes, pentafecta outcomes, and RENAL nephrometry scoring (RNS).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Data of 201 RAPN patients were analyzed. The mean SPARE score was 3 (range 0-11). 113 patients were classified as low risk, 64 as intermediate risk, and 24 as high risks. On multivariate analysis SPARE score alone predicted complications (OR 1.37, p=0.014) and trifecta outcomes (OR 0.75, p=0.000) while age (OR 0.96, p=0.042), preoperative eGFR (OR 0.97, p=0.001) and SPARE scores (OR 0.81, p=0.016) were predictors for pentafecta outcomes. Receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis between SPARE and RNS in predicting the complications; trifecta and pentafecta outcomes had a comparable area under the curve.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Our study validates the SPARE nephrometry scoring system in predicting postoperative complications, trifecta, and pentafecta outcomes in a RAPN cohort. The predictive accuracy of SPARE is similar to RNS.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78272787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Impact of chronic exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors on the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19: a case-control study in male population from two COVID-19 regional centers of Lombardy (Italy). 长期暴露于5- α还原酶抑制剂对COVID-19住院风险的影响:来自伦巴第(意大利)两个COVID-19区域中心的男性人群的病例对照研究
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04081-3
M. Lazzeri, S. Duga, E. Azzolini, V. Fasulo, N. Buffi, A. Saita, G. Lughezzani, E. Paraboschi, R. Hurle, A. Nobili, M. Cecconi, G. Guazzoni, P. Casale, R. Asselta
BACKGROUNDThere are sex differences in vulnerability to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The coronavirus S protein mediates viral entry into target cells employing the host cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 for S-protein priming. The TMPRSS2 gene expression is responsive to androgen stimulation and it could partially explain sex differences. We hypothesized that men chronically exposed to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) have a lower risk of hospitalization for COVID-19.METHODSThis is a population-based case-control study on consecutive patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus who required hospitalization for COVID-19 (cases), age-matched to beneficiaries of the Lombardy Regional Health Service (controls). Data were collected by two high-volume COVID-19 regional centers of Lombardy (Italy). The primary outcome was to compare the prevalence of patients chronically exposed to 5ARIs, who required hospitalization for COVID-19, with the one of controls.RESULTSOverall, 943 males were enrolled; 45 (4.77%) were exposed to 5ARI. COVID-19 patients aged >55 years under 5ARI treatment were significantly less than expected on the basis of the prevalence of 5ARI treatment among age-matched controls (5.57 vs. 8.14%; p=0.0083, 95%CI=0.75-3.97%). This disproportion was higher for men aged >65 (7.14 vs. 12.31%; p=0.0001, 95%CI=2.83-6.97%). Eighteen 5ARIs-patients died; the mean age of men who died was higher than those who did not: 75.98±9.29 vs. 64.78±13.57 (p<0.001). Cox-regression and multivariable models did not show correlation between 5ARIs exposure and protection against intensive care unit admission/death.CONCLUSIONSMen exposed to 5ARIs might be less vulnerable to severe COVID-19, supporting its use in disease prophylaxis.
背景2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的易感性存在性别差异。冠状病毒S蛋白通过宿主细胞丝氨酸蛋白酶TMPRSS2介导病毒进入靶细胞进行S蛋白引物。TMPRSS2基因表达对雄激素刺激有反应,这可以部分解释性别差异。我们假设长期暴露于5- α还原酶抑制剂(5ARIs)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的男性因COVID-19住院的风险较低。方法本研究是一项基于人群的病例对照研究,研究对象为连续感染SARS-CoV-2病毒且因COVID-19需要住院治疗的患者(病例),年龄与伦巴第地区卫生服务受益人(对照组)相匹配。数据由伦巴第(意大利)的两个高容量COVID-19区域中心收集。主要结果是比较长期暴露于5ARIs并因COVID-19需要住院治疗的患者与对照组的患病率。结果共纳入943名男性;暴露于5ARI的45例(4.77%)。年龄>55岁接受5ARI治疗的COVID-19患者明显低于年龄匹配对照中5ARI治疗患病率的预期(5.57 vs 8.14%;p = 0.0083, 95% ci 0.75 = -3.97%)。在65岁以上的男性中,这一比例更高(7.14% vs 12.31%;p = 0.0001, 95% ci 2.83 = -6.97%)。5ari患者死亡18例;死亡男性的平均年龄高于未死亡男性:75.98±9.29比64.78±13.57 (p<0.001)。cox -回归和多变量模型未显示5ARIs暴露与预防重症监护病房入院/死亡之间的相关性。结论暴露于5ARIs的男性对重症COVID-19的易感程度较低,支持其在疾病预防中的应用。
{"title":"Impact of chronic exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors on the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19: a case-control study in male population from two COVID-19 regional centers of Lombardy (Italy).","authors":"M. Lazzeri, S. Duga, E. Azzolini, V. Fasulo, N. Buffi, A. Saita, G. Lughezzani, E. Paraboschi, R. Hurle, A. Nobili, M. Cecconi, G. Guazzoni, P. Casale, R. Asselta","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04081-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04081-3","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000There are sex differences in vulnerability to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The coronavirus S protein mediates viral entry into target cells employing the host cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 for S-protein priming. The TMPRSS2 gene expression is responsive to androgen stimulation and it could partially explain sex differences. We hypothesized that men chronically exposed to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) have a lower risk of hospitalization for COVID-19.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000This is a population-based case-control study on consecutive patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus who required hospitalization for COVID-19 (cases), age-matched to beneficiaries of the Lombardy Regional Health Service (controls). Data were collected by two high-volume COVID-19 regional centers of Lombardy (Italy). The primary outcome was to compare the prevalence of patients chronically exposed to 5ARIs, who required hospitalization for COVID-19, with the one of controls.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Overall, 943 males were enrolled; 45 (4.77%) were exposed to 5ARI. COVID-19 patients aged >55 years under 5ARI treatment were significantly less than expected on the basis of the prevalence of 5ARI treatment among age-matched controls (5.57 vs. 8.14%; p=0.0083, 95%CI=0.75-3.97%). This disproportion was higher for men aged >65 (7.14 vs. 12.31%; p=0.0001, 95%CI=2.83-6.97%). Eighteen 5ARIs-patients died; the mean age of men who died was higher than those who did not: 75.98±9.29 vs. 64.78±13.57 (p<0.001). Cox-regression and multivariable models did not show correlation between 5ARIs exposure and protection against intensive care unit admission/death.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000Men exposed to 5ARIs might be less vulnerable to severe COVID-19, supporting its use in disease prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80188138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Classification and Standardized Reporting of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements. 经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的分类和标准化报告:国际尿石症联盟(IAU)共识声明。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04107-7
S. Choong, J. J. de la Rosette, J. Denstedt, G. Zeng, K. Sarıca, G. Mazzon, I. Saltirov, S. K. Pal, M. Agrawal, J. Desai, A. Petřík, N. Buchholz, M. Maroclo, S. Gordon, A. Sridhar
BACKGROUNDTo reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs.METHODSThe RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement.RESULTSTwenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardised reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of post-operative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%).CONCLUSIONSThe consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs.
背景:对不同类型pcnl的分类和标准化报告达成共识。方法采用兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适当性方法达成共识。我们对pcnl的指南和共识的文献进行了回顾,并制定了32份声明,包括程序具体细节,结果测量和pcnl的分类。邀请专家进行了两轮输入,第一轮允许对提议的陈述进行独立修改,并提供增加陈述的选项。第二轮为所有发言打分。每个声明都在第三轮中进行了讨论,以决定包括哪些声明。任何建议或分歧都经过辩论和讨论,以达成一致的协议。结果确定了25项建议,以提供标准化的程序和结果报告。共识得分在80%以上得到了小组的强烈同意。与治疗相关的主要结果是鞘的大小(99.1%)和PCNL的位置(93.5%)。排名最高的结局指标包括术后住院时间定义(94.4%)和估计失血量(93.5%)。结论该共识声明有助于明确手术技术、临床试验设计、规范化报告和结果呈现,比较不同类型pcnl的预后。
{"title":"Classification and Standardized Reporting of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements.","authors":"S. Choong, J. J. de la Rosette, J. Denstedt, G. Zeng, K. Sarıca, G. Mazzon, I. Saltirov, S. K. Pal, M. Agrawal, J. Desai, A. Petřík, N. Buchholz, M. Maroclo, S. Gordon, A. Sridhar","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04107-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04107-7","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000To reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Twenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardised reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of post-operative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000The consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88017348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Systematic review of neoadjuvant therapy by immune checkpoint inhibitors before radical cystectomy: where do we stand? 免疫检查点抑制剂在根治性膀胱切除术前的新辅助治疗的系统回顾:我们站在哪里?
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03833-3
Simone Albisinni, Fouad Aoun, Romain Diamand, Georges Mjaess, Francesco Esperto, Nieves Martinez Chanza, Thierry Roumeguère, Cosimo De Nunzio

Introduction: After demonstrating their efficacy in metastatic urothelial cancer (UC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are currently being tested in the neoadjuvant setting before radical cystectomy. In this systematic review, we analyze current available data and ongoing trials exploring the efficacy and safety of ICI neoadjuvant therapy in UC.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic search was performed including the combination of the following words: (["neoadjuvant" AND "immunotherapy"] AND ["bladder" AND "cancer"]). Three search engines (PubMed, Embase®, and Web of Science) were queried up to January 1, 2020. Study selection followed the PRISMA guidelines. After screening, 9 articles and abstracts fully compatible with the PICOS were included in the systematic review.

Evidence synthesis: The PURE-01 trial showed a 37% complete response (pT0) after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. In the ABACUS trial, atezolizumab determined a complete response in 31% of patients. In both trials, an increased expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 was associated to an improved response to ICI. Moreover, ICI are well tolerated with grade III-IV adverse events in 6% of cases. In the PURE-01 trial, radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant ICI presents a similar complication rate compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with fever (N.= 35, 52%) and ileus (N. = 21, 31%) being the most common postoperative complications. Numerous trials are currently recruiting to test ICI in the neoadjuvant setting, either alone, in combination immunotherapy or with chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Pembrolizumab and atezolizumab single agent demonstrated favorable results for ICI in the neoadjuvant setting. Patients with a higher tumor expression of PD-L1 appear to experience a higher response to ICI, although the adequate biomarker remains to be identified. Radical cystectomy appears to be safe after ICI treatment. The results of the currently ongoing prospective trial are awaited with impatience by the uro-oncologic community.

在证明了其对转移性尿路上皮癌(UC)的疗效后,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)目前正在根治性膀胱切除术前的新辅助环境中进行测试。在这篇系统综述中,我们分析了目前可用的数据和正在进行的试验,探讨了ICI新辅助治疗UC的有效性和安全性。证据获取:进行了系统搜索,包括以下单词的组合:(“新辅助”和“免疫治疗”)和(“膀胱”和“癌症”)。三个搜索引擎(PubMed, Embase®和Web of Science)被查询到2020年1月1日。研究选择遵循PRISMA指南。经筛选,9篇与PICOS完全兼容的文章和摘要被纳入系统评价。证据综合:PURE-01试验显示,新辅助派姆单抗治疗后的完全缓解率(pT0)为37%。在ABACUS试验中,atezolizumab确定31%的患者完全缓解。在这两项试验中,PD-1或PD-L1表达的增加与ICI的改善反应有关。此外,ICI耐受性良好,6%的病例出现III-IV级不良事件。在PURE-01试验中,与新辅助化疗相比,新辅助ICI术后根治性膀胱切除术的并发症发生率相似,其中发热(n = 35, 52%)和肠梗阻(n = 21, 31%)是最常见的术后并发症。目前正在招募许多试验来测试ICI在新辅助环境下,无论是单独,联合免疫治疗还是与化疗。结论:Pembrolizumab和atezolizumab单药在新辅助治疗中显示出良好的ICI效果。肿瘤中PD-L1表达较高的患者似乎对ICI有更高的反应,尽管适当的生物标志物仍有待确定。根治性膀胱切除术在ICI治疗后似乎是安全的。目前正在进行的前瞻性试验的结果正在焦急地等待泌尿肿瘤学社区。
{"title":"Systematic review of neoadjuvant therapy by immune checkpoint inhibitors before radical cystectomy: where do we stand?","authors":"Simone Albisinni,&nbsp;Fouad Aoun,&nbsp;Romain Diamand,&nbsp;Georges Mjaess,&nbsp;Francesco Esperto,&nbsp;Nieves Martinez Chanza,&nbsp;Thierry Roumeguère,&nbsp;Cosimo De Nunzio","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03833-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03833-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After demonstrating their efficacy in metastatic urothelial cancer (UC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are currently being tested in the neoadjuvant setting before radical cystectomy. In this systematic review, we analyze current available data and ongoing trials exploring the efficacy and safety of ICI neoadjuvant therapy in UC.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search was performed including the combination of the following words: ([\"neoadjuvant\" AND \"immunotherapy\"] AND [\"bladder\" AND \"cancer\"]). Three search engines (PubMed, Embase<sup>®</sup>, and Web of Science) were queried up to January 1, 2020. Study selection followed the PRISMA guidelines. After screening, 9 articles and abstracts fully compatible with the PICOS were included in the systematic review.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The PURE-01 trial showed a 37% complete response (pT0) after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. In the ABACUS trial, atezolizumab determined a complete response in 31% of patients. In both trials, an increased expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 was associated to an improved response to ICI. Moreover, ICI are well tolerated with grade III-IV adverse events in 6% of cases. In the PURE-01 trial, radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant ICI presents a similar complication rate compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with fever (N.= 35, 52%) and ileus (N. = 21, 31%) being the most common postoperative complications. Numerous trials are currently recruiting to test ICI in the neoadjuvant setting, either alone, in combination immunotherapy or with chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pembrolizumab and atezolizumab single agent demonstrated favorable results for ICI in the neoadjuvant setting. Patients with a higher tumor expression of PD-L1 appear to experience a higher response to ICI, although the adequate biomarker remains to be identified. Radical cystectomy appears to be safe after ICI treatment. The results of the currently ongoing prospective trial are awaited with impatience by the uro-oncologic community.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10756061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Active treatment of renal stones in pelvic ectopic kidney: systematic review of literature. 盆腔异位肾肾结石的积极治疗:文献系统综述。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-16 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03792-3
Matteo Salvi, Gianluca Muto, Agostino Tuccio, Antonio A Grosso, Andrea Mari, Alfonso Crisci, Marco Carini, Andrea Minervini

Introduction: Chronic obstruction and stones formation are common in pelvic ectopic kidney (PEK), and stone treatment in such conditions can be challenging. Aim of this systematic review was to examine all the available active treatment modalities for PEK stones in order to critically appraise their advantages and limitations.

Evidence acquisition: A search on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify literature focused on the active treatment of PEK stones. Original articles, case report and case series were included in the search. The systematic review was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA checklist. The study period went from inception of databases to October 2019.

Evidence synthesis: Of the 256 articles identified, 23 met the inclusion criteria. 334 patients were included in the studies and 119 had stones in PEK. Five patients were treated with SWL, 40 with ureterorenoscopy, 37 with percutaneous nephrolithotomy both by ultrasound/X-Ray or lap-assisted puncture, and 37 with minimally invasive laparoscopic or robot assisted pyelolithotomy. Overall, stone free rate after first treatment was higher in minimally invasive laparoscopic or robot assisted pyelolithotomy (97.2%) compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (84.96%) and ureterorenoscopy studies (65.94%). The higher complication rate was reported in percutaneous nephrolithotomy not lap-assisted (33.3%).

Conclusions: The choice of the approach depends on different factors such as stone size, density and location in accordance with upper urinary tract alterations, kidney anatomy and operator experience. The choice of a retrograde, percutaneous or lap/robot approach should be carefully selected evaluating upper urinary tract anatomy and stone features.

慢性梗阻和结石形成在盆腔异位肾(PEK)中很常见,这种情况下的结石治疗可能具有挑战性。本系统综述的目的是检查所有可用的PEK结石的积极治疗方式,以便批判性地评估其优点和局限性。证据获取:在Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行检索,以确定有关PEK结石积极治疗的文献。原始文章、病例报告和病例系列被纳入检索。系统评价按照PRISMA检查表进行。研究期间从数据库建立到2019年10月。证据综合:256篇文献中,23篇符合纳入标准。334例患者纳入研究,其中119例PEK结石。5例采用SWL, 40例采用输尿管镜,37例采用超声/ x线或膝上辅助穿刺经皮肾镜取石,37例采用微创腹腔镜或机器人辅助肾盂取石。总体而言,微创腹腔镜或机器人辅助肾盂取石术首次治疗后的结石清除率(97.2%)高于经皮肾取石术(84.96%)和输尿管镜检查(65.94%)。无膝上辅助的经皮肾镜取石术并发症发生率较高(33.3%)。结论:根据上尿路病变、肾脏解剖及术者经验,选择不同的入路方式,如结石大小、密度、位置等。应仔细选择逆行、经皮或膝上/机器人入路,评估上尿路解剖和结石特征。
{"title":"Active treatment of renal stones in pelvic ectopic kidney: systematic review of literature.","authors":"Matteo Salvi,&nbsp;Gianluca Muto,&nbsp;Agostino Tuccio,&nbsp;Antonio A Grosso,&nbsp;Andrea Mari,&nbsp;Alfonso Crisci,&nbsp;Marco Carini,&nbsp;Andrea Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03792-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03792-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstruction and stones formation are common in pelvic ectopic kidney (PEK), and stone treatment in such conditions can be challenging. Aim of this systematic review was to examine all the available active treatment modalities for PEK stones in order to critically appraise their advantages and limitations.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A search on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify literature focused on the active treatment of PEK stones. Original articles, case report and case series were included in the search. The systematic review was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA checklist. The study period went from inception of databases to October 2019.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Of the 256 articles identified, 23 met the inclusion criteria. 334 patients were included in the studies and 119 had stones in PEK. Five patients were treated with SWL, 40 with ureterorenoscopy, 37 with percutaneous nephrolithotomy both by ultrasound/X-Ray or lap-assisted puncture, and 37 with minimally invasive laparoscopic or robot assisted pyelolithotomy. Overall, stone free rate after first treatment was higher in minimally invasive laparoscopic or robot assisted pyelolithotomy (97.2%) compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (84.96%) and ureterorenoscopy studies (65.94%). The higher complication rate was reported in percutaneous nephrolithotomy not lap-assisted (33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of the approach depends on different factors such as stone size, density and location in accordance with upper urinary tract alterations, kidney anatomy and operator experience. The choice of a retrograde, percutaneous or lap/robot approach should be carefully selected evaluating upper urinary tract anatomy and stone features.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37840759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Functional and oncological outcomes of 3D clampless sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with low nephrometry score. 三维无钳无缝腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾测量评分低的肾肿瘤的功能和肿瘤预后。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-04 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9
Carlo Introini, Antonia Di Domenico, Marco Ennas, Fabio Campodonico, Claudia Brusasco, Andrea Benelli

Background: Renal cell carcinoma still represents 2-3% of all tumors but its mortality is decreased in the last decades due to the early detection of small masses and to the innovative surgical techniques. The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of clampless and sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CSLPN) in terms of intra- and postoperative functional results, complication rate and oncological outcome.

Methods: We evaluated patients undergoing CSLPN between July 2013 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were single, organ confined tumor with size ≤4 cm, intraparenchymal depth ≤1.5 cm, renal nephrometry score between 4 and 6 and no close contact with the collecting system.

Results: Overall, 62 patients underwent CSLPN. Mean operative time was 105 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 165 mL. Mean drain time and hospital stay were respectively 2.5 and 4.2 days. Mean 24 hours hemoglobin (Hb) decrease was 2.5 g/dL. No significative variations are described in pre- and postoperative renal function. Twelve patients had postoperative complications. At a median follow-up of 38.5 months all the patients are alive and disease free.

Conclusions: Different techniques have been proposed to reduce warm ischemia time (WIT). In our experience we found many benefits in an off-clamp procedure: it gives an ischemia-related advantage, reduces the overall operating time, eliminates the risks associated with the isolation of hilar vessels. In conclusion CSLPN is a safe and effective procedure for selected renal masses; it does not increase complication rate and offers excellent functional and oncological outcomes.

背景:肾细胞癌仍占所有肿瘤的2-3%,但由于早期发现小肿块和创新的手术技术,其死亡率在过去几十年中有所下降。本研究的目的是评估无夹和无缝线腹腔镜部分肾切除术(CSLPN)在术中和术后功能结果、并发症发生率和肿瘤预后方面的安全性和可行性。方法:我们评估了2013年7月至2019年12月期间接受CSLPN的患者。纳入标准为单一、脏器局限、肿瘤大小≤4cm、肾实质内深度≤1.5 cm、肾肾测量评分在4 ~ 6分之间、与采集系统无密切接触。结果:62例患者接受了CSLPN。平均手术时间105 min,平均术中出血量165 mL,平均引流时间2.5 d,平均住院时间4.2 d。平均24小时血红蛋白(Hb)下降2.5 g/dL。术前和术后肾功能无明显变化。12例患者出现术后并发症。在38.5个月的中位随访中,所有患者都存活且无疾病。结论:提出了不同的技术来缩短热缺血时间。根据我们的经验,我们发现非钳夹手术有很多好处:它具有与缺血相关的优势,减少了总体操作时间,消除了与门脉隔离相关的风险。结论:CSLPN是一种安全有效的手术方法;它不会增加并发症发生率,并提供良好的功能和肿瘤预后。
{"title":"Functional and oncological outcomes of 3D clampless sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with low nephrometry score.","authors":"Carlo Introini,&nbsp;Antonia Di Domenico,&nbsp;Marco Ennas,&nbsp;Fabio Campodonico,&nbsp;Claudia Brusasco,&nbsp;Andrea Benelli","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma still represents 2-3% of all tumors but its mortality is decreased in the last decades due to the early detection of small masses and to the innovative surgical techniques. The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of clampless and sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CSLPN) in terms of intra- and postoperative functional results, complication rate and oncological outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated patients undergoing CSLPN between July 2013 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were single, organ confined tumor with size ≤4 cm, intraparenchymal depth ≤1.5 cm, renal nephrometry score between 4 and 6 and no close contact with the collecting system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 62 patients underwent CSLPN. Mean operative time was 105 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 165 mL. Mean drain time and hospital stay were respectively 2.5 and 4.2 days. Mean 24 hours hemoglobin (Hb) decrease was 2.5 g/dL. No significative variations are described in pre- and postoperative renal function. Twelve patients had postoperative complications. At a median follow-up of 38.5 months all the patients are alive and disease free.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different techniques have been proposed to reduce warm ischemia time (WIT). In our experience we found many benefits in an off-clamp procedure: it gives an ischemia-related advantage, reduces the overall operating time, eliminates the risks associated with the isolation of hilar vessels. In conclusion CSLPN is a safe and effective procedure for selected renal masses; it does not increase complication rate and offers excellent functional and oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38233477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The urothelium, the urinary microbioma and men LUTS: a systematic review. 尿路上皮、泌尿微生物瘤与男性LUTS:系统综述。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-16 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03762-5
Riccardo Lombardo, Giorgia Tema, Jean N Cornu, Ferdinando Fusco, Kevin McVary, Andrea Tubaro, Cosimo De Nunzio

Introduction: The pathophysiology and management of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is still a matter of debate. In the past few years, the urothelium and the urinary microbiota represented important areas of research to improve the understanding and management of these patients. Aim of the present review was to summarize the available data on the urothelium and the microbiota related to male LUTS.

Evidence acquisition: A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between January 2000 and December 2019 was performed using the medical subjects heading "urothelium," "microbioma," "microbiota," "urobioma," "urobiota," "benign prostatic hyperplasia," "benign prostatic enlargement," "lower urinary tract symptoms," "lower urinary tract dysfunction," "men," "male," "overactive bladder," "receptors." Exclusion criteria included: animal studies and studies on muscarinic and adrenergic pathways.

Evidence synthesis: The urothelium has been recently evaluated in humans to evaluate new possible markers and pathways. New possible targets for the treatment of male LUTS include the neural growth factor, the cannabinoid, the vanilloid and the ATP pathways. However, studies in humans are still needed to elucidate the exact role of these pathways in the management of male patients with LUTS. The available evidence on the urinary microbioma in male is poor. Standing to the available, urinary microbioma is evident in healthy urine in males. Moreover, the urinary microbioma varies depending on the method of collection, sexually transmitted disease status, inflammation and urinary symptoms. A possible role of probiotics in the management of LUTS in women has been proposed and may have a role in male patients as well.

Conclusions: The urothelium and the urinary microbiota are still poorly studied in men with LUTS. Most of the evidence and the hypothesis on the relationship between urothelium/urinary microbiota and LUTS comes from animal/in-vitro evidence while clinical trials are lacking. These pathways seem interesting even in LUTS pathogenesis in men but their possible role as a new therapeutic target is still an open debate.

导言:男性下尿路症状(LUTS)的病理生理学和治疗仍然是一个有争议的问题。在过去的几年里,尿路上皮和泌尿微生物群代表了重要的研究领域,以提高对这些患者的理解和管理。本文综述了泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系泌尿系。证据获取:通过国家生物技术信息中心(NCBI) PubMed检索2000年1月至2019年12月期间发表的相关文章,检索主题为“尿路上皮”、“微生物瘤”、“微生物群”、“尿路生物瘤”、“尿路生物群”、“良性前列腺增生”、“良性前列腺增大”、“下尿路症状”、“下尿路功能障碍”、“男性”、“男性”、“膀胱过度活跃”、“受体”。排除标准包括:动物研究和毒蕈碱和肾上腺素能途径的研究。证据合成:最近对人类尿路上皮进行了评估,以评估新的可能的标记和途径。治疗男性LUTS的新可能靶点包括神经生长因子、大麻素、香草素和ATP途径。然而,仍然需要对人类进行研究,以阐明这些途径在男性LUTS患者管理中的确切作用。目前关于男性泌尿系统微生物瘤的证据很少。根据现有资料,泌尿微生物瘤在男性健康尿液中是明显的。此外,泌尿系统微生物瘤因收集方法、性传播疾病状况、炎症和泌尿系统症状而异。益生菌可能在女性LUTS的治疗中发挥作用,也可能在男性患者中发挥作用。结论:尿路上皮和尿微生物群在LUTS患者中的研究仍然很少。大多数关于尿路上皮/泌尿系统微生物群与LUTS关系的证据和假设来自动物/体外证据,缺乏临床试验。即使在男性LUTS发病机制中,这些途径似乎也很有趣,但它们作为新的治疗靶点的可能作用仍然存在争议。
{"title":"The urothelium, the urinary microbioma and men LUTS: a systematic review.","authors":"Riccardo Lombardo,&nbsp;Giorgia Tema,&nbsp;Jean N Cornu,&nbsp;Ferdinando Fusco,&nbsp;Kevin McVary,&nbsp;Andrea Tubaro,&nbsp;Cosimo De Nunzio","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03762-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03762-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pathophysiology and management of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is still a matter of debate. In the past few years, the urothelium and the urinary microbiota represented important areas of research to improve the understanding and management of these patients. Aim of the present review was to summarize the available data on the urothelium and the microbiota related to male LUTS.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between January 2000 and December 2019 was performed using the medical subjects heading \"urothelium,\" \"microbioma,\" \"microbiota,\" \"urobioma,\" \"urobiota,\" \"benign prostatic hyperplasia,\" \"benign prostatic enlargement,\" \"lower urinary tract symptoms,\" \"lower urinary tract dysfunction,\" \"men,\" \"male,\" \"overactive bladder,\" \"receptors.\" Exclusion criteria included: animal studies and studies on muscarinic and adrenergic pathways.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The urothelium has been recently evaluated in humans to evaluate new possible markers and pathways. New possible targets for the treatment of male LUTS include the neural growth factor, the cannabinoid, the vanilloid and the ATP pathways. However, studies in humans are still needed to elucidate the exact role of these pathways in the management of male patients with LUTS. The available evidence on the urinary microbioma in male is poor. Standing to the available, urinary microbioma is evident in healthy urine in males. Moreover, the urinary microbioma varies depending on the method of collection, sexually transmitted disease status, inflammation and urinary symptoms. A possible role of probiotics in the management of LUTS in women has been proposed and may have a role in male patients as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The urothelium and the urinary microbiota are still poorly studied in men with LUTS. Most of the evidence and the hypothesis on the relationship between urothelium/urinary microbiota and LUTS comes from animal/in-vitro evidence while clinical trials are lacking. These pathways seem interesting even in LUTS pathogenesis in men but their possible role as a new therapeutic target is still an open debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38056838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Non-papillary percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones. 非乳头状经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角结石。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04124-7
P. Kallidonis, A. Vagionis, Marco Lattarulo, C. Adamou, A. Tsaturyan, D. Liourdi, T. Vrettos, C. Simeone, E. Liatsikos
BACKGROUNDTo evaluate the non-papillary puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones in terms of safety and efficacy.METHODSData of 53 patients undergoing PCNL for staghorn stones were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2019. A non-papillary puncture was performed with a two- step track dilation technique up to 30Fr. A 26 Fr semirigid nephroscope and an ultrasonic lithotripter with integrated suction (Swiss Lithoclast master, EMS S.A, Switzerland) were used for the treatment. Demographics and perioperative data were retrospectively gathered from an institutional board approved database.RESULTSThe average stone size was 60.1±16.1 mm. Mean operative time was 54.57±14.83 minutes, while mean time using fluoroscopy was 2.67±1.02 minutes. Mean number of accesses was 1.2 (a total of 64 accesses). Flexible nephroscope was never used. Primary stone-free rate after PCNL was 81.1% (43 patients). Mean hemoglobin drop was 1.6±1.86 gr/dl. Overall patient stay was 3.94±0.82 days, while overall complication rate was 20.7% (11 patients), with only one patient requiring blood transfusion due to pseudoaneurysm.CONCLUSIONSThe use of non-papillary access for PCNL in the treatment of staghorn stones resulted in promising results in terms of stone-free rate, operating time, complication rate, hemoglobin drop and reduced the number of percutaneous tracts. These parameters of the current investigation were directly comparable to current literature. The safety and efficacy of a non-papillary approach for the treatment of staghorn stones could be advocated.
目的:评价经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中非乳头状穿刺治疗鹿角结石的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性收集2015年1月至2019年12月53例鹿角结石行PCNL的患者资料。非乳头状穿刺采用两步径迹扩张技术,达到30Fr。采用26fr型半刚性肾镜和一体化吸吸超声碎石机(Swiss Lithoclast master, EMS s.a., Switzerland)进行治疗。人口统计学和围手术期数据回顾性收集自一个机构委员会批准的数据库。结果平均结石大小为60.1±16.1 mm。平均手术时间54.57±14.83分钟,平均透视时间2.67±1.02分钟。平均访问次数为1.2次(共64次访问)。从未使用柔性肾镜。PCNL术后原发性结石清除率为81.1%(43例)。平均血红蛋白下降1.6±1.86克/分升。患者总住院时间为3.94±0.82天,总并发症发生率为20.7%(11例),仅有1例患者因假性动脉瘤需要输血。结论PCNL采用非乳头状通道治疗鹿角结石,在结石清除率、手术时间、并发症发生率、血红蛋白下降、经皮导管数量减少等方面均取得了令人满意的效果。本研究的这些参数可与现有文献直接比较。非乳头入路治疗鹿角结石的安全性和有效性值得提倡。
{"title":"Non-papillary percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones.","authors":"P. Kallidonis, A. Vagionis, Marco Lattarulo, C. Adamou, A. Tsaturyan, D. Liourdi, T. Vrettos, C. Simeone, E. Liatsikos","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04124-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04124-7","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000To evaluate the non-papillary puncture for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones in terms of safety and efficacy.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000Data of 53 patients undergoing PCNL for staghorn stones were retrospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2019. A non-papillary puncture was performed with a two- step track dilation technique up to 30Fr. A 26 Fr semirigid nephroscope and an ultrasonic lithotripter with integrated suction (Swiss Lithoclast master, EMS S.A, Switzerland) were used for the treatment. Demographics and perioperative data were retrospectively gathered from an institutional board approved database.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000The average stone size was 60.1±16.1 mm. Mean operative time was 54.57±14.83 minutes, while mean time using fluoroscopy was 2.67±1.02 minutes. Mean number of accesses was 1.2 (a total of 64 accesses). Flexible nephroscope was never used. Primary stone-free rate after PCNL was 81.1% (43 patients). Mean hemoglobin drop was 1.6±1.86 gr/dl. Overall patient stay was 3.94±0.82 days, while overall complication rate was 20.7% (11 patients), with only one patient requiring blood transfusion due to pseudoaneurysm.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000The use of non-papillary access for PCNL in the treatment of staghorn stones resulted in promising results in terms of stone-free rate, operating time, complication rate, hemoglobin drop and reduced the number of percutaneous tracts. These parameters of the current investigation were directly comparable to current literature. The safety and efficacy of a non-papillary approach for the treatment of staghorn stones could be advocated.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75941723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1