Background: Aim of our study is to analyze the incidence of postoperative infectious complications and to assess its predictors in patients with indwelling ureteral stent treated with ureteroscopy (URS).
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data of patients treated with URS from January 2017 to July 2018 at our center. We included 88 consecutive patients with available stent culture (SC) and urine culture (UC). Cefoxitin 2 g IV was given as prophylaxis in all patients with negative preoperative UC; otherwise, the choice of antibiotic was based on antibiogram. Ureteral stent was removed before URS procedure and analyzed. No postoperative antibiotic was given. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was built to assess preoperative predictors of postoperative infectious complications.
Results: Nineteen patients (22%) developed postoperative infectious complications and fever was the most common one. E. faecalis, which is not responsive to common prophylaxis schemes in force in our institution, was the most frequent pathogen isolated. Overall, 26% of patients were found to have a discordance between SC and UC. At multivariable logistic regression analysis preoperative SC positivity (Odds Ratio [OR]: 11.00, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]:1.08-111.41, P=0.04) was the only significant predictor of postoperative infectious complications.
Conclusions: About one to five patients treated with URS developed an infectious complication and E. faecalis and E. coli were the most frequent pathogen isolated. A positive SC is the only independent risk factor for postoperative infection: consequently, an early SC analysis could allow a prompt antibiotic therapy in all patients with positive SC even if mildly symptomatic.
Background: Prediction of extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) is of utmost importance. Great variability in the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been reported for prediction of EPE. The present study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of mpMRI for predicting EPE in different National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories.
Methods: Overall 664 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with a staging mpMRI were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients with mpMRI report non-compliant with PI-RADSv2.0, were excluded. Patients were stratified according to NCCN criteria: very low/low (VLR-LR) to High Risk (HR) in order to assess final pathology EPE rates (focal and established). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of staging mpMRI were computed in each group. Univariable and multivariable analysis were used to evaluate predictors of positive surgical margins.
Results: Pathological evaluation demonstrated established and focal EPE in 60 (9%) and 106 (16%) patients, respectively, while mpMRI suspicion for EPE was present in 180 (27%) patients. Age, preoperative PSA, PSA density, number of positive cores, NCCN groups, prostate volume, mpMRI suspicion for EPE, PIRADSv2.0 and lesion size differed significantly between the patients with any EPE and without EPE (all P≤0.05). The sensitivity of mpMRI in detecting any EPE varied from 12% (95% CI: 0.6-53%) in VLR-LR to 83% (66-93%) in HR while the corresponding values for the specificity were 92% (85-96%) and 63% (45-78%), respectively. Patients with false-negative mpMRI EPE prediction were more likely to have positive surgical margins in univariable (OR: 2.14; CI: 1.18, 3.87) as well as multivariable analysis adjusting for NCCN risk categories (OR: 1.97; CI: 1.08, 3.60).
Conclusions: The performance of mpMRI for prediction of EPE varies greatly between different NCCN risk categories with a low positive predicting value in patients at low to favorable intermediate risk and a low negative predictive value in patients at Unfavorable intermediate to high risk PCa. Given that mpMRI EPE misdiagnosis could have a negative impact on oncological and functional outcomes, NCCN risk categories should be considered when interpreting mpMRI findings in PCa patients.
Background: The aim of our study is to develop a clinical nomogram including metabolic syndrome status for the prediction of high-grade prostate cancer (HG PCa).
Methods: A series of men at increased risk of PCa undergoing prostate biopsies were enrolled in a single center. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the adult treatment panel III. A nomogram was generated based on the logistic regression model and used to predict high grade prostate cancer defined as grade group ≥3 (ISUP 2014). ROC curves, calibration plots and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram.
Results: Overall, 738 patients were enrolled. Greater than or equal to 294/738 (40%) of the patients presented PCa and of those patients, 84/294 (39%) presented high grade disease (Grade Group ≥3). On multivariate analysis, DRE (OR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.80-5.84), PSA (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16), PV (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99) and MetS (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.13-3.59) were predictors of HG PCa. The nomogram based on the model presented good discrimination (AUC: 0.76), good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow Test, P>0.05) and a net benefit in the range of probabilities between 10% and 70%.
Conclusions: Metabolic syndrome is highly prevalent in patients at risk of prostate cancer and is particularly associated with high-grade prostate cancer. Our nomogram offers the possibility to include metabolic status in the assessment of patients at risk of prostate cancer to identify men who may have a high-grade form of the disease. External validation is warranted before its clinical implementation.