首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluating Prone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques in the Surgical Settings: A Systematic Review of Case Studies. 评估外科手术中的俯卧位心肺复苏技术:病例研究的系统回顾。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.07.011
Jose D Ramirez, Tito D Tubog

Purpose: Examine the prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques in patients undergoing surgery.

Design: Systematic review.

Methods: Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and gray literature databases were searched to obtain eligible studies. The methodological quality of the case studies was assessed using the tool proposed by Murad and colleagues. Case reports involving surgical patients in a prone position were included.

Findings: A total of 21 patients undergoing neurologic or spinal surgeries were evaluated. The most common cardiac rhythms observed before arrest were pulseless electrical activity, asystole, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and sudden bradycardia. The etiologies of the cardiac arrests included venous air embolism, hemorrhagic shock, and hypovolemia. Posterior compressions at T7 to T9 vertebral segment, with or without counterpressure, were immediately instituted. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in each instance, with an average time to return of spontaneous circulation of 5.60 minutes. Using a quality assessment tool, we determined that all case reports were of high quality and exhibited a low risk of bias.

Conclusions: Prone resuscitation during neurosurgical or spinal surgeries has demonstrated promising outcomes. Additionally, the findings of this review further emphasize the need to train health care personnel in the techniques of prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

目的:研究手术患者的俯卧位心肺复苏技术:系统综述:采用系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,在 PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Google Scholar 和灰色文献数据库中搜索符合条件的研究。采用 Murad 及其同事提出的工具对病例研究的方法学质量进行了评估。涉及俯卧位手术患者的病例报告也包括在内:共对 21 名接受神经或脊柱手术的患者进行了评估。心跳骤停前最常见的心律是无脉电活动、无收缩、室性心动过速、心室颤动和突发心动过缓。心跳骤停的病因包括静脉空气栓塞、失血性休克和低血容量。立即对 T7 至 T9 椎节进行后方按压,无论是否使用反压。每次都能恢复自主循环,恢复自主循环的平均时间为 5.60 分钟。通过质量评估工具,我们确定所有病例报告的质量均较高,偏倚风险较低:结论:神经外科或脊柱手术期间的俯卧位复苏效果良好。此外,本综述的结果进一步强调了对医护人员进行俯卧位心肺复苏技术培训的必要性。
{"title":"Evaluating Prone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques in the Surgical Settings: A Systematic Review of Case Studies.","authors":"Jose D Ramirez, Tito D Tubog","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.07.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Examine the prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques in patients undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and gray literature databases were searched to obtain eligible studies. The methodological quality of the case studies was assessed using the tool proposed by Murad and colleagues. Case reports involving surgical patients in a prone position were included.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 21 patients undergoing neurologic or spinal surgeries were evaluated. The most common cardiac rhythms observed before arrest were pulseless electrical activity, asystole, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and sudden bradycardia. The etiologies of the cardiac arrests included venous air embolism, hemorrhagic shock, and hypovolemia. Posterior compressions at T7 to T9 vertebral segment, with or without counterpressure, were immediately instituted. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in each instance, with an average time to return of spontaneous circulation of 5.60 minutes. Using a quality assessment tool, we determined that all case reports were of high quality and exhibited a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone resuscitation during neurosurgical or spinal surgeries has demonstrated promising outcomes. Additionally, the findings of this review further emphasize the need to train health care personnel in the techniques of prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety in Adult Patients: An Updated Meta-analysis. 虚拟现实对成年患者术前焦虑的影响:最新 Meta 分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.009
Hongyan Xu, Jiakun Hou, Jing Zhou, Shanshan Wang

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) on preoperative anxiety in adult patients.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods: A systematic search was carried out using PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG DATA, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Sino-Med from inception to December 18, 2022. All eligible randomized controlled trials published were included (published in English and Chinese). The Cochrane Collaboration "Risk of Bias" tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Review Manager software 5.4 was used for data analysis.

Findings: Nine studies with sample sizes ranging from 72 to 255 and 1,046 participants were identified. The results of the meta-analysis showed that VR significantly reduced preoperative anxiety in adults (standardized mean difference = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.03, P = .04). Our results suggested that VR improved postoperative satisfaction scores more effectively compared with control care (mean difference = 15.29, 95% CI: 6.25 to 24.33, P = .0009).

Conclusions: Study results support that VR has a positive effect in reducing preoperative anxiety in adults. VR can also significantly improve patients' satisfaction after surgery. However, the results need to be further assessed due to the small sample sizes and high heterogeneity.

目的:确定虚拟现实(VR)对成年患者术前焦虑症的疗效:设计:对随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:方法:使用PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、PsycINFO、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)和Sino-Med进行系统检索。所有符合条件的随机对照试验均被纳入(以中英文发表)。采用 Cochrane 协作 "偏倚风险 "工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用Review Manager软件5.4进行数据分析:9项研究的样本量从72到255不等,共有1,046名参与者。荟萃分析结果表明,VR 能显著降低成人的术前焦虑(标准化平均差 = -0.48,95% CI:-0.93 至 -0.03,P = .04)。我们的结果表明,与对照组护理相比,VR 能更有效地提高术后满意度评分(平均差异 = 15.29,95% CI:6.25 至 24.33,P = .0009):研究结果表明,VR 对减轻成人术前焦虑有积极作用。研究结果表明,VR 对减轻成人术前焦虑有积极作用,还能明显提高患者术后的满意度。然而,由于样本量较小,异质性较高,研究结果还需进一步评估。
{"title":"Effects of Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety in Adult Patients: An Updated Meta-analysis.","authors":"Hongyan Xu, Jiakun Hou, Jing Zhou, Shanshan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) on preoperative anxiety in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was carried out using PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG DATA, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Sino-Med from inception to December 18, 2022. All eligible randomized controlled trials published were included (published in English and Chinese). The Cochrane Collaboration \"Risk of Bias\" tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Review Manager software 5.4 was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine studies with sample sizes ranging from 72 to 255 and 1,046 participants were identified. The results of the meta-analysis showed that VR significantly reduced preoperative anxiety in adults (standardized mean difference = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.03, P = .04). Our results suggested that VR improved postoperative satisfaction scores more effectively compared with control care (mean difference = 15.29, 95% CI: 6.25 to 24.33, P = .0009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study results support that VR has a positive effect in reducing preoperative anxiety in adults. VR can also significantly improve patients' satisfaction after surgery. However, the results need to be further assessed due to the small sample sizes and high heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Matters to Patients on the Day of Surgery-A Flash Mob Study. 手术当天患者最关心的问题--快闪族研究。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.114
Hejdi Gamst-Jensen, Lone Dragnes Brix, Tina Mai Nørgaard Madsen, Susanne Winther Olsen, Anja Geisler, Anja Egelund, Thordis Thomsen, Bente Buch, Linda Veedfald, Christina Lykke Stenberg Forsman Hansen, Anne Højager Nielsen

Purpose: To explore what matters to patients on the day of surgery, to describe how a flash mob study was conducted in a perioperative setting and to provide recommendations for future studies adopting the flash mob design.

Design: Flash mob study.

Methods: On June 6 to June 7, 2023, a 24-hour flash mob study was carried out in eight Danish perioperative units. Eligible for inclusion were adult patients scheduled for elective or acute surgery. After giving informed consent, patients answered two qualitative questions: what mattered to them on the day of surgery, and whether the staff were aware of this. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Patient characteristics were presented using descriptive statistics.

Findings: Patients expressed a need to feel safe and cared for, be informed, and to receive proper anesthesia and postoperative care. Twenty-nine percent had not told health care staff, most often because they had not been asked about what mattered to them and because they did not want to be a nuisance.

Conclusions: The flash mob study was feasible and provided insight into patients' perspectives on the day of surgery. To gain insight into what matters on the day of surgery, health care professionals must actively ask patients. Furthermore, the flash mob proved to be an opportunity to create attention to what matters to patients on the day of surgery.

目的:探讨患者在手术当天最关心的问题,介绍如何在围手术期环境中开展快闪研究,并为今后采用快闪设计的研究提供建议:设计:快闪研究:2023年6月6日至6月7日,在丹麦的8个围术期科室开展了24小时快闪研究。研究对象为计划接受择期手术或急性手术的成年患者。在获得知情同意后,患者回答了两个定性问题:手术当天什么对他们最重要,以及工作人员是否了解这一点。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。患者特征采用描述性统计:研究结果:患者表示需要安全感和关怀、知情权,以及接受适当的麻醉和术后护理。29%的患者没有告诉医护人员,最常见的原因是他们没有被问及对他们来说重要的事情,以及他们不想给医护人员添麻烦:快闪族研究是可行的,并能深入了解患者对手术当天的看法。要深入了解手术当天的重要事项,医护人员必须主动询问患者。此外,事实证明,快闪活动是一个让患者关注手术当天重要事项的机会。
{"title":"What Matters to Patients on the Day of Surgery-A Flash Mob Study.","authors":"Hejdi Gamst-Jensen, Lone Dragnes Brix, Tina Mai Nørgaard Madsen, Susanne Winther Olsen, Anja Geisler, Anja Egelund, Thordis Thomsen, Bente Buch, Linda Veedfald, Christina Lykke Stenberg Forsman Hansen, Anne Højager Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore what matters to patients on the day of surgery, to describe how a flash mob study was conducted in a perioperative setting and to provide recommendations for future studies adopting the flash mob design.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Flash mob study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On June 6 to June 7, 2023, a 24-hour flash mob study was carried out in eight Danish perioperative units. Eligible for inclusion were adult patients scheduled for elective or acute surgery. After giving informed consent, patients answered two qualitative questions: what mattered to them on the day of surgery, and whether the staff were aware of this. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Patient characteristics were presented using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Patients expressed a need to feel safe and cared for, be informed, and to receive proper anesthesia and postoperative care. Twenty-nine percent had not told health care staff, most often because they had not been asked about what mattered to them and because they did not want to be a nuisance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The flash mob study was feasible and provided insight into patients' perspectives on the day of surgery. To gain insight into what matters on the day of surgery, health care professionals must actively ask patients. Furthermore, the flash mob proved to be an opportunity to create attention to what matters to patients on the day of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142330678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effects of Acupressure on Preoperative Anxiety, Postoperative Pain, and Nausea and Vomiting in Otolaryngology Patients. 穴位按摩对耳鼻喉科患者术前焦虑、术后疼痛以及恶心呕吐的影响
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.027
Seda Turkili, Ahmet Karaman, Tugba Çam Yanık, Gülay Altun Ugraş, Serpil Yüksel, Serkan Turkili, Bahar Taşdelen

Purpose: Surgical patients frequently experience symptoms such as preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and nausea and vomiting. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acupressure on preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and nausea and vomiting in otolaryngology patients.

Design: The study was designed as a prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel, 2-armed (1:1), randomized controlled trial.

Methods: The sample of this study consisted of 60 otolaryngology patients. Patients were assigned to the acupressure (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups (1:1) through randomization. During the preoperative period, participants in the acupressure group received a 15-minute treatment involving pressure applied to the HT7, LI4, and EX-HN3 points. No intervention was administered to participants in the control group. Preoperative anxiety levels were evaluated using the State Anxiety Scale both before and 15 minutes after the acupressure application. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 4 hours postoperatively, at 10:00 p.m., at 08:00 a.m., and upon discharge. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed at discharge using the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching.

Findings: Although the preoperative anxiety of the control group increased in the operating room waiting area, that of the acupressure group decreased significantly (P = .033). The postoperative pain severity levels of the 2 groups were similar at the fourth hour after surgery and at 10:00 p.m. (P > .05), whereas they were significantly lower at 08:00 a.m. (P = .04) and discharge (P = .048) in the acupressure group. No significant difference was found between the groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting symptoms (P > .05).

Conclusions: Acupressure was effective in reducing the severity of preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in otolaryngology patients, but the same effect was not observed in postoperative nausea and vomiting.

目的:手术患者经常会出现术前焦虑、术后疼痛、恶心呕吐等症状。本研究旨在确定穴位按摩对耳鼻喉科患者术前焦虑、术后疼痛和恶心呕吐的影响:研究设计为前瞻性、评估者盲法、平行、双臂(1:1)、随机对照试验:研究样本包括 60 名耳鼻喉科患者。患者被随机分配到穴位按摩组(30 人)或对照组(30 人)(1:1)。在术前期间,穴位按摩组的参与者接受了 15 分钟的治疗,对 HT7、LI4 和 EX-HN3 穴位进行按压。对照组参与者未接受任何干预。在进行穴位按摩之前和之后 15 分钟,使用国家焦虑量表对术前焦虑水平进行评估。术后 4 小时、晚上 10:00、早上 8:00 和出院时,使用数字疼痛评分量表对术后疼痛进行评估。出院时使用罗德恶心、呕吐和反胃指数评估术后恶心和呕吐情况:尽管对照组患者在手术室等候区的术前焦虑程度有所上升,但穴位按摩组患者的焦虑程度明显下降(P = .033)。两组患者在术后第四小时和晚上 10:00 时的术后疼痛严重程度相似(P > .05),而穴位按摩组在早上 8:00 时(P = .04)和出院时(P = .048)的疼痛严重程度明显降低。两组在术后恶心和呕吐症状方面无明显差异(P > .05):结论:穴位按摩能有效减轻耳鼻喉科患者术前焦虑和术后疼痛的严重程度,但在术后恶心和呕吐方面没有观察到同样的效果。
{"title":"The Effects of Acupressure on Preoperative Anxiety, Postoperative Pain, and Nausea and Vomiting in Otolaryngology Patients.","authors":"Seda Turkili, Ahmet Karaman, Tugba Çam Yanık, Gülay Altun Ugraş, Serpil Yüksel, Serkan Turkili, Bahar Taşdelen","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgical patients frequently experience symptoms such as preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and nausea and vomiting. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acupressure on preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and nausea and vomiting in otolaryngology patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was designed as a prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel, 2-armed (1:1), randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample of this study consisted of 60 otolaryngology patients. Patients were assigned to the acupressure (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups (1:1) through randomization. During the preoperative period, participants in the acupressure group received a 15-minute treatment involving pressure applied to the HT7, LI4, and EX-HN3 points. No intervention was administered to participants in the control group. Preoperative anxiety levels were evaluated using the State Anxiety Scale both before and 15 minutes after the acupressure application. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 4 hours postoperatively, at 10:00 p.m., at 08:00 a.m., and upon discharge. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed at discharge using the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Although the preoperative anxiety of the control group increased in the operating room waiting area, that of the acupressure group decreased significantly (P = .033). The postoperative pain severity levels of the 2 groups were similar at the fourth hour after surgery and at 10:00 p.m. (P > .05), whereas they were significantly lower at 08:00 a.m. (P = .04) and discharge (P = .048) in the acupressure group. No significant difference was found between the groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting symptoms (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acupressure was effective in reducing the severity of preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in otolaryngology patients, but the same effect was not observed in postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Potential Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety Concerns in Health Care. 医疗保健中潜在的人工智能患者安全问题。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.018
Jacqueline Ross
{"title":"Potential Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety Concerns in Health Care.","authors":"Jacqueline Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Between English Proficiency and Postoperative Pain Management for Adult Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 接受妇科手术的成年患者的英语熟练程度与术后疼痛管理之间的关系:回顾性队列研究
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.111
Jakob E Gamboa, Sarah S Nofal, Jack Pattee, Marsha K Guess, Claudia F Clavijo

Purpose: To determine if language-based disparities in postoperative pain management exist in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Design: A retrospective cohort study was performed.

Methods: The electronic medical records were reviewed of individuals, aged 18 to 80, who underwent an abdominal hysterectomy between 2016 and 2021 at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center. A random sample of 100 patients, 50 categorized as English proficient and 50 categorized as having limited English proficiency (LEP), were compared. The primary outcomes were the number of quantitative pain assessments and the total dose of opioid given in oral morphine milligram equivalents. The secondary outcomes were the average pain scores, the number of qualitative pain assessments, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, regional block use, patient-controlled analgesia, or opioid use after the first 24 hours. Linear and generalized linear modeling was used to assess the relationship between English proficiency and the outcomes of interest.

Findings: All patients received at least 1 pain assessment while in the postanesthesia care unit (range 2 to 25). There was no significant difference in the number of objective pain assessments or the total dose of opioid given between the groups. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes between the groups. On subgroup analysis, the presence of a documented bedside interpreter did not result in a significant difference in endpoints. Fewer LEP patients received patient-controlled analgesia (34% LEP vs 58% English proficient), though the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: Language barriers may complicate care and impact postoperative recovery. In our population of women in a high-volume, urban, level I, trauma center, there were no observed differences in postoperative pain management practices in patients with LEP compared with English-proficient patients. Standardized nursing protocols may contribute to more equitable care. Ongoing investigations in the identification and prevention of language-related disparities in perioperative care are warranted.

目的:确定接受妇科手术的女性在术后疼痛管理方面是否存在语言差异:方法:回顾性队列研究:研究人员查阅了科罗拉多大学安舒茨医学中心 2016 年至 2021 年期间接受腹部子宫切除术的 18 至 80 岁患者的电子病历。随机抽取了 100 名患者进行比较,其中 50 人被归类为英语熟练者,50 人被归类为英语水平有限者(LEP)。主要结果是疼痛定量评估的次数和阿片类药物的总剂量(以口服吗啡毫克当量计)。次要结果是平均疼痛评分、定性疼痛评估次数、麻醉后护理病房的住院时间、区域阻滞的使用、患者自控镇痛或最初 24 小时后阿片类药物的使用。采用线性和广义线性模型评估英语水平与相关结果之间的关系:所有患者在麻醉后护理病房都接受了至少一次疼痛评估(范围为 2 至 25 次)。两组患者在客观疼痛评估次数或阿片类药物总剂量上没有明显差异。各组之间的次要结果也无明显差异。在亚组分析中,有记录的床旁翻译并没有导致终点的显著差异。接受患者自控镇痛的 LEP 患者较少(LEP 患者占 34% ,英语熟练者占 58%),但差异未达到统计学意义:语言障碍可能会使护理工作复杂化并影响术后恢复。我们所在的城市一级创伤中心人流量大,女性居多,与精通英语的患者相比,在术后疼痛管理实践中没有观察到LEP患者的差异。标准化的护理方案可能有助于实现更公平的护理。在围手术期护理中识别和预防与语言有关的差异方面,有必要进行持续调查。
{"title":"Association Between English Proficiency and Postoperative Pain Management for Adult Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jakob E Gamboa, Sarah S Nofal, Jack Pattee, Marsha K Guess, Claudia F Clavijo","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if language-based disparities in postoperative pain management exist in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic medical records were reviewed of individuals, aged 18 to 80, who underwent an abdominal hysterectomy between 2016 and 2021 at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center. A random sample of 100 patients, 50 categorized as English proficient and 50 categorized as having limited English proficiency (LEP), were compared. The primary outcomes were the number of quantitative pain assessments and the total dose of opioid given in oral morphine milligram equivalents. The secondary outcomes were the average pain scores, the number of qualitative pain assessments, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, regional block use, patient-controlled analgesia, or opioid use after the first 24 hours. Linear and generalized linear modeling was used to assess the relationship between English proficiency and the outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All patients received at least 1 pain assessment while in the postanesthesia care unit (range 2 to 25). There was no significant difference in the number of objective pain assessments or the total dose of opioid given between the groups. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes between the groups. On subgroup analysis, the presence of a documented bedside interpreter did not result in a significant difference in endpoints. Fewer LEP patients received patient-controlled analgesia (34% LEP vs 58% English proficient), though the difference did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Language barriers may complicate care and impact postoperative recovery. In our population of women in a high-volume, urban, level I, trauma center, there were no observed differences in postoperative pain management practices in patients with LEP compared with English-proficient patients. Standardized nursing protocols may contribute to more equitable care. Ongoing investigations in the identification and prevention of language-related disparities in perioperative care are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Local Anesthetic Injection for Pain Relief During Peripheral Venous Insertion in Adult Surgical Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. 比较局麻药注射对成人外科手术患者外周静脉置管过程中的镇痛效果:前瞻性观察研究
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.108
Susumu Yoshida, Kiyoyuki W Miyasaka, Rimu Suzuki, Nobuko Fujita, Seiki Abe

Purpose: Intradermal injection of local anesthetic has been reported to have greater analgesic effect for peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion than topical application in adult surgical patients. However, the injection of local anesthetic itself is a painful procedure compared to topical application. We compared the analgesic effect of a lidocaine-prilocaine patch with intradermal injection of 2 % lidocaine on pain intensity at the time of analgesia and PVC insertion as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) in adult patients.

Design: A prospective observational study.

Methods: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, we studied 70 patients scheduled for surgery and expected to have peripheral venous cannulation in the operating room. Patients who presented in the operating room with a topical anesthetic patch were assigned to the patch group, and patients who presented without a topical anesthetic patch were assigned to the injection group. The injection group received a 2 % lidocaine injection with a 26-gauge (G) needle just before PVC insertion by anesthetists. The patch group received a lidocaine-prilocaine patch on the dorsal hand 1 to 2 hours before the scheduled surgery time by ward nurses. The primary endpoints were pain using the VAS score at the time of PVC insertion and pain associated with the local anesthetic procedure.

Findings: The patch group included 34 patients (21 male, 13 female, age 61 [median], interquartile range [IQR] 45 to 69), and the intradermal injection group included 31 patients (22 male, 9 female, age 60 [median], IQR 52 to 73). All patients analyzed had a 20-G catheter in the dorsal hand. The median VAS score for PVC insertion was 4 in the intradermal injection group (IQR 0 to 14) and 2 in the patch group (IQR 0 to 16) (P = .707). Median VAS scores for the local anesthetic procedure were 16 in the intradermal injection group (IQR 10 to 32) and 0 in the patch group (IQR 0 to 0) (P < .001).

Conclusions: We found no difference in the pain intensity for PVC insertion between topical application of local anesthetic by lidocaine-prilocaine patch and intradermal injection of 2 % lidocaine. VAS scores for anesthetic application were significantly lower in the patch group. The lidocaine-prilocaine patch provided analgesia equivalent to intradermal injection with 2 % lidocaine for PVC but without the pain associated with injection of local anesthetic.

目的:有报道称,在成年手术患者插入外周静脉导管(PVC)时,皮内注射局麻药比局部应用具有更强的镇痛效果。然而,与局部应用相比,注射局麻药本身是一个痛苦的过程。我们比较了利多卡因-普鲁卡因贴片与皮内注射2%利多卡因对成年患者镇痛时疼痛强度和插入PVC时疼痛强度的影响,以视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估:前瞻性观察研究:经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,我们对 70 名计划接受手术且预计将在手术室进行外周静脉插管的患者进行了研究。带局部麻醉贴片进入手术室的患者被分配到贴片组,未带局部麻醉贴片进入手术室的患者被分配到注射组。注射组在麻醉师插入 PVC 前用 26 号针头注射 2% 的利多卡因。贴片组在预定手术时间前 1 到 2 小时由病房护士在手背上贴上利多卡因-普鲁卡因贴片。主要终点是插入 PVC 时的 VAS 疼痛评分和与局部麻醉过程相关的疼痛:贴片组包括 34 名患者(21 名男性,13 名女性,年龄[中位数]61 岁,四分位数间距[IQR] 45 至 69),皮内注射组包括 31 名患者(22 名男性,9 名女性,年龄[中位数]60 岁,四分位数间距[IQR] 52 至 73)。所有接受分析的患者的手背都插有一根 20 G 导管。皮内注射组 PVC 插入的中位 VAS 评分为 4(IQR 0 至 14),贴片组为 2(IQR 0 至 16)(P = .707)。皮内注射组在局部麻醉过程中的 VAS 评分中位数为 16(IQR 10 至 32),而贴片组为 0(IQR 0 至 0)(P 结论:P = 0.707):我们发现,使用利多卡因-阿普鲁卡因局部麻醉贴片和皮内注射 2% 利多卡因插入 PVC 时的疼痛强度没有差异。贴片组使用麻醉剂时的 VAS 评分明显较低。利多卡因-阿普鲁卡因贴片的镇痛效果相当于皮内注射2%利多卡因进行PVC,但没有注射局麻药带来的疼痛。
{"title":"Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Local Anesthetic Injection for Pain Relief During Peripheral Venous Insertion in Adult Surgical Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Susumu Yoshida, Kiyoyuki W Miyasaka, Rimu Suzuki, Nobuko Fujita, Seiki Abe","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intradermal injection of local anesthetic has been reported to have greater analgesic effect for peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion than topical application in adult surgical patients. However, the injection of local anesthetic itself is a painful procedure compared to topical application. We compared the analgesic effect of a lidocaine-prilocaine patch with intradermal injection of 2 % lidocaine on pain intensity at the time of analgesia and PVC insertion as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board (IRB) approval, we studied 70 patients scheduled for surgery and expected to have peripheral venous cannulation in the operating room. Patients who presented in the operating room with a topical anesthetic patch were assigned to the patch group, and patients who presented without a topical anesthetic patch were assigned to the injection group. The injection group received a 2 % lidocaine injection with a 26-gauge (G) needle just before PVC insertion by anesthetists. The patch group received a lidocaine-prilocaine patch on the dorsal hand 1 to 2 hours before the scheduled surgery time by ward nurses. The primary endpoints were pain using the VAS score at the time of PVC insertion and pain associated with the local anesthetic procedure.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The patch group included 34 patients (21 male, 13 female, age 61 [median], interquartile range [IQR] 45 to 69), and the intradermal injection group included 31 patients (22 male, 9 female, age 60 [median], IQR 52 to 73). All patients analyzed had a 20-G catheter in the dorsal hand. The median VAS score for PVC insertion was 4 in the intradermal injection group (IQR 0 to 14) and 2 in the patch group (IQR 0 to 16) (P = .707). Median VAS scores for the local anesthetic procedure were 16 in the intradermal injection group (IQR 10 to 32) and 0 in the patch group (IQR 0 to 0) (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no difference in the pain intensity for PVC insertion between topical application of local anesthetic by lidocaine-prilocaine patch and intradermal injection of 2 % lidocaine. VAS scores for anesthetic application were significantly lower in the patch group. The lidocaine-prilocaine patch provided analgesia equivalent to intradermal injection with 2 % lidocaine for PVC but without the pain associated with injection of local anesthetic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analgesic Characteristics of Ultrasound-guided Great Auricular Nerve Block in Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Preliminary Trial. 超声引导下大耳廓神经阻滞在中耳手术中的镇痛特性:前瞻性随机对照初步试验。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107
Ting-Ting Li, Hong-Su Zhou, Juan Li, Quan-Yuan Chang, Chen-Yang Zhai, Yu-Cong Liu, Nan Zhao, Ting-Hua Wang, Lin-Lin Xiong

Purpose: To explore the analgesic characteristics of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve (GAN) block to further improve pain management.

Design: Single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind preliminary clinical trial.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients who underwent middle ear surgery were included in this study: 15 in the GAN block group (the large ear nerve block [NB] group) and 22 in the traditional anesthesia group (control [CON] group). After induction of anesthesia, the NB group was given an ultrasound-guided GAN block (0.25 % Ropivacaine 2 mL), while the CON group was exempt from the GAN block. The patient's basic information, perioperative information, the region, and numeric rating scale of postoperative pain (at 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours), and adverse reactions were recorded. Repeated measurement analysis, t test, and Fisher exact probability method were used for statistical analysis.

Findings: Compared with the CON group, the numeric rating scale in the NB group was lower after surgery (1 hour: 1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20, P = .023; 6 hours: 1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39, P = .203; 12 hours: 1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10, P < .001; 24 hours: 0.55 ± 0.17 vs 0.13 ± 0.09, P = .029). In the NB group, the region of pain was merely concentrated in the ear canal. In the CON group, the pain extended to areas outside the ear canal, such as tragus and mastoid (at 12 hours, P = .006). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided GAN block can relieve patients' pain after middle ear surgery, especially in the area outside the ear canal.

目的:探讨超声引导下大耳廓神经(GAN)阻滞的镇痛特性,以进一步改善疼痛管理:单中心、前瞻性、随机对照、双盲初步临床试验:本研究共纳入 37 名接受中耳手术的患者:GAN阻滞组(大耳神经阻滞[NB]组)15人,传统麻醉组(对照[CON]组)22人。麻醉诱导后,NB 组在超声引导下进行 GAN 阻滞(0.25 % 罗哌卡因 2 mL),而 CON 组则无需进行 GAN 阻滞。记录患者的基本信息、围术期信息、术后疼痛的区域和数字评分表(1 小时、6 小时、12 小时和 24 小时)以及不良反应。统计分析采用重复测量分析、t 检验和费雪精确概率法:与 CON 组相比,NB 组术后的数字评分量表较低(1 小时:1.18 ± 0.35 vs 1.18 ± 0.35):1小时:1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20,P = .023;6小时:1.82 ± 0.37 vs 0.27 ± 0.20,P = .023:1小时:1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20,P = .023;6小时:1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39,P = .203;12小时:1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10,P 结论:超声引导下 GAN 阻滞可减轻中耳手术后患者的疼痛,尤其是耳道外区域的疼痛。
{"title":"Analgesic Characteristics of Ultrasound-guided Great Auricular Nerve Block in Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Preliminary Trial.","authors":"Ting-Ting Li, Hong-Su Zhou, Juan Li, Quan-Yuan Chang, Chen-Yang Zhai, Yu-Cong Liu, Nan Zhao, Ting-Hua Wang, Lin-Lin Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the analgesic characteristics of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve (GAN) block to further improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind preliminary clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients who underwent middle ear surgery were included in this study: 15 in the GAN block group (the large ear nerve block [NB] group) and 22 in the traditional anesthesia group (control [CON] group). After induction of anesthesia, the NB group was given an ultrasound-guided GAN block (0.25 % Ropivacaine 2 mL), while the CON group was exempt from the GAN block. The patient's basic information, perioperative information, the region, and numeric rating scale of postoperative pain (at 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours), and adverse reactions were recorded. Repeated measurement analysis, t test, and Fisher exact probability method were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with the CON group, the numeric rating scale in the NB group was lower after surgery (1 hour: 1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20, P = .023; 6 hours: 1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39, P = .203; 12 hours: 1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10, P < .001; 24 hours: 0.55 ± 0.17 vs 0.13 ± 0.09, P = .029). In the NB group, the region of pain was merely concentrated in the ear canal. In the CON group, the pain extended to areas outside the ear canal, such as tragus and mastoid (at 12 hours, P = .006). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided GAN block can relieve patients' pain after middle ear surgery, especially in the area outside the ear canal.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Prewarming on Maintaining Perioperative Body Temperature: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 预热对维持围手术期体温的影响:随机临床试验
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.011
Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Juliana Rizzo Gnatta, Cassiane de Santana Lemos, Amy Hagedorn Wonder, Ariane Souza do Nascimento, Michele Estevanatto Tose de Godoi, João Francisco Possari, Ulysses Ribeiro

Purpose: To determine the prewarming effect on body temperature in the perioperative period of patients undergoing conventional abdominal surgery and the level of thermal comfort.

Design: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Methods: A Brazilian oncology hospital located in São Paulo. A total of 99 patients aged 18 years or over undergoing elective conventional abdominal surgeries, with a minimum duration of 1 hour of anesthesia. The study was carried out from 2019 to 2021. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: prewarming with a blanket and cotton sheet (control; n = 33); prewarming with a forced-air warming system for 20 minutes (intervention 1; n = 33); prewarming with a forced-air warming system for 30 minutes (intervention 2; n = 33). Central temperature was measured by a zero-heat-flux temperature sensor every 20 minutes from the preoperative period until the surgery end time. The level of thermal comfort was determined through self-report during the preanesthetic and postanesthetic periods.

Findings: There was a significant difference between the temperatures between the groups (P = .048), with evidence of greater benefit in maintaining the temperature in the group that received the prewarming intervention for 20 minutes. There was no significant difference between the percentage of temperatures below 36 °C among the groups (P = .135). Patients in the intervention groups were more comfortable during the postanesthetic recovery period than those in the control group (P = .048). Only 7 (8.24%) patients had postoperative chills (P = .399) and more than half of these incidents occurred in the control group (4; 13.3%).

Conclusions: Prewarming for 20 minutes obtained the best results, showing the lowest average of temperature episodes below 36 °C during the intraoperative period and greater thermal comfort as reported by patients.

目的:确定预热对常规腹部手术患者围手术期体温的影响以及热舒适度:随机对照临床试验:一家位于圣保罗的巴西肿瘤医院。共有 99 名年龄在 18 岁或以上的患者接受择期常规腹部手术,麻醉时间至少为 1 小时。研究时间为 2019 年至 2021 年。患者被随机分为3组:用毯子和棉被单进行预热(对照组;n = 33);用强制空气加温系统预热20分钟(干预1;n = 33);用强制空气加温系统预热30分钟(干预2;n = 33)。从术前到手术结束,每隔 20 分钟用零热流温度传感器测量一次中心温度。在麻醉前和麻醉后,通过自我报告确定热舒适度:各组之间的体温有明显差异(P = .048),有证据表明接受预热干预 20 分钟的组在保持体温方面获益更大。各组体温低于 36 °C 的百分比无明显差异(P = .135)。干预组患者在麻醉后恢复期间比对照组患者更舒适(P = .048)。只有 7 名(8.24%)患者在术后发冷(P = .399),其中一半以上发生在对照组(4;13.3%):结论:预热 20 分钟的效果最好,术中温度低于 36°C 的平均次数最少,患者反映的热舒适度更高。
{"title":"Impact of Prewarming on Maintaining Perioperative Body Temperature: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Juliana Rizzo Gnatta, Cassiane de Santana Lemos, Amy Hagedorn Wonder, Ariane Souza do Nascimento, Michele Estevanatto Tose de Godoi, João Francisco Possari, Ulysses Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the prewarming effect on body temperature in the perioperative period of patients undergoing conventional abdominal surgery and the level of thermal comfort.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Brazilian oncology hospital located in São Paulo. A total of 99 patients aged 18 years or over undergoing elective conventional abdominal surgeries, with a minimum duration of 1 hour of anesthesia. The study was carried out from 2019 to 2021. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: prewarming with a blanket and cotton sheet (control; n = 33); prewarming with a forced-air warming system for 20 minutes (intervention 1; n = 33); prewarming with a forced-air warming system for 30 minutes (intervention 2; n = 33). Central temperature was measured by a zero-heat-flux temperature sensor every 20 minutes from the preoperative period until the surgery end time. The level of thermal comfort was determined through self-report during the preanesthetic and postanesthetic periods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was a significant difference between the temperatures between the groups (P = .048), with evidence of greater benefit in maintaining the temperature in the group that received the prewarming intervention for 20 minutes. There was no significant difference between the percentage of temperatures below 36 °C among the groups (P = .135). Patients in the intervention groups were more comfortable during the postanesthetic recovery period than those in the control group (P = .048). Only 7 (8.24%) patients had postoperative chills (P = .399) and more than half of these incidents occurred in the control group (4; 13.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prewarming for 20 minutes obtained the best results, showing the lowest average of temperature episodes below 36 °C during the intraoperative period and greater thermal comfort as reported by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Different Doses of Ropivacaine for Caudal Block in School-aged Children Undergoing Shang Ring Circumcision. 不同剂量的罗哌卡因对接受上环包皮环切术的学龄儿童腹腔阻滞的影响
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.012
Bin Zhang, Zhaofang Zhang, Xin Huang, Weilian Ren, Junxia Wang

Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different doses of ropivacaine in Shang Ring circumcision in school-aged children.

Design: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Methods: A total of 148 American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II children were enrolled and randomly assigned into the R0.2%, R0.25%, and R0.3% groups. These groups received 0.2%, 0.25%, and 0.3% of ropivacaine (0.5 mL/kg) for caudal block, respectively. The perioperative data on anesthesia quality (including adequate analgesia rate, analgesic duration, lower extremity numbness duration, and postoperative first urination time), and adverse events were collected. Hemodynamic variables were also measured perioperatively.

Findings: The adequate analgesia rate of caudal block in the R0.2% group (75.5%) was significantly lower than that in the R0.25% (94.0%) and R0.3% groups (98.0%) (P = .001). The analgesic duration of the R0.2% and R0.25% groups was significantly less than that of the R0.3% group (P < .001). The duration of lower extremity numbness in R0.2% group was significantly shorter than that in R0.25% (P < .05) and R0.3% groups (P < .01), and there was no significant difference between the R0.25% and R0.3% groups. The first urination time of R0.2% was significantly shorter than the R0.3% group (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the R0.2% and R0.25% or the R0.25% and R0.3% groups. No significant difference was found in adverse effects among groups (P > .05).

Conclusions: Caudal block with 0.3% ropivacaine can provide more satisfactory intraoperative analgesia quality for school-aged children receiving Shang Ring circumcision, without increasing the risk of adverse effects.

目的:本研究旨在评估三种不同剂量的罗哌卡因在学龄儿童尚环包皮环切术中的效果:这是一项前瞻性、随机对照研究:方法:共招募了 148 名美国麻醉学会 I 至 II 级儿童,并随机分配到 R0.2%、R0.25% 和 R0.3% 组。这些组别分别使用 0.2%、0.25% 和 0.3% 的罗哌卡因(0.5 mL/kg)进行尾椎阻滞。收集了围手术期的麻醉质量(包括充分镇痛率、镇痛持续时间、下肢麻木持续时间和术后首次排尿时间)和不良反应数据。围手术期还测量了血流动力学变量:R0.2%组的尾椎阻滞充分镇痛率(75.5%)明显低于R0.25%组(94.0%)和R0.3%组(98.0%)(P = .001)。R0.2% 组和 R0.25% 组的镇痛持续时间明显少于 R0.3% 组(P .05):结论:使用 0.3% 罗哌卡因进行臀部阻滞可为接受尚环包皮环切术的学龄儿童提供更令人满意的术中镇痛质量,同时不会增加不良反应的风险。
{"title":"The Effect of Different Doses of Ropivacaine for Caudal Block in School-aged Children Undergoing Shang Ring Circumcision.","authors":"Bin Zhang, Zhaofang Zhang, Xin Huang, Weilian Ren, Junxia Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.05.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different doses of ropivacaine in Shang Ring circumcision in school-aged children.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 148 American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II children were enrolled and randomly assigned into the R0.2%, R0.25%, and R0.3% groups. These groups received 0.2%, 0.25%, and 0.3% of ropivacaine (0.5 mL/kg) for caudal block, respectively. The perioperative data on anesthesia quality (including adequate analgesia rate, analgesic duration, lower extremity numbness duration, and postoperative first urination time), and adverse events were collected. Hemodynamic variables were also measured perioperatively.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The adequate analgesia rate of caudal block in the R0.2% group (75.5%) was significantly lower than that in the R0.25% (94.0%) and R0.3% groups (98.0%) (P = .001). The analgesic duration of the R0.2% and R0.25% groups was significantly less than that of the R0.3% group (P < .001). The duration of lower extremity numbness in R0.2% group was significantly shorter than that in R0.25% (P < .05) and R0.3% groups (P < .01), and there was no significant difference between the R0.25% and R0.3% groups. The first urination time of R0.2% was significantly shorter than the R0.3% group (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the R0.2% and R0.25% or the R0.25% and R0.3% groups. No significant difference was found in adverse effects among groups (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caudal block with 0.3% ropivacaine can provide more satisfactory intraoperative analgesia quality for school-aged children receiving Shang Ring circumcision, without increasing the risk of adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1