Blood Transfusion最新文献

Background: Current national and international guidelines (Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry [IBMDR], World Marrow Donor Association [WMDA] standards) provide an indication for preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD) only in adult family and volunteer non-family donors in anticipation of bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation to avoid the use of homologous transfusions. In addition, there is no clear guidance from the relevant scientific societies regarding pediatric and adolescent donors.

Material and methods: To assess the actual use of PAD in pediatric (up to 14 years) and adolescent (aged 15-18 years) family donors in relation to BM HSC donation in the five years 2017-2021, a specific online questionnaire was administered to blood establishments and clinical units of pediatric transplantation programs responsible for BM HSC collection.

Results: Adherence to the project was 100% (18/18 centers). During the five-year period considered, 273 BM HSC donors (205 pediatric and 68 adolescent) were registered. Forty percent of the non-trait carrier donors who underwent PAD received iron therapy in preparation for BM HSC donation; only 4.8% of the pediatric and none of the adolescents had hemoglobin values below the age limit at donation. Finally, 66.4% of pediatric donors and 15.4% of non-trait carrier adolescent donors who did not undergo PAD received homologous transfusions during BM harvest.

Discussion: The present study highlights the highly heterogeneous criteria for the use of PAD (including calculating of the volume of whole blood collected) and the lack of a specific policy in preparation for BM HSC donation, either from non-trait carrier donors or those with sickle cell or thalassemia trait, both pediatric and adolescent.

Background: There is some evidence showing rebound of COVID-19 infections in patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir between 2 and 8 days following cessation of the antiviral treatment. COVID-19 rebound is not unique to patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, but is also observed in molnupiravir recipients, in patients who did not receive any antiviral treatment and in patients who received convalescent plasma (CP).

Materials and methods: This was a systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating rates of virologic and clinical rebound in COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral agents, CP or no treatment. Both randomized clinical trials and controlled cohort studies were considered. The methodological quality of trials was assessed using ROB-2 and ROBIN-1 checklists, and the GRADE approach.

Results: Data were available from 16 trials. The occurrence of virologic rebound was more commonly observed among nirmatrelvir recipients than among untreated patients (relative risk [RR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-3.28; p=0.0007). No differences were observed in the occurrence of virologic rebound between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.71-1.43). Similar rates of virologic rebounds were observed in molnupiravir recipients and untreated patients (RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.81-1.6). One study in the pre-omicron period compared rates of virologic rebound between patients receiving standard of care with or without CP: no differences were observed between groups (RR=1.04; 95% CI: 0.55-1.99). Rates of clinical rebound were reported in seven trials, five evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and untreated patients, and two evaluating nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed. For all these comparisons, the certainty of the available evidence was graded as low or moderate.

Discussion: Virologic rebound of COVID-19 infections appears to be mild and self-limited, and was observed more commonly in nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients than in untreated patients, but was also observed in patients treated with molnupiravir or CP.

Background: Hemoglobinopathies are the commonest genetic defect worldwide (7% of the world's population has at least one hemoglobin mutation). Although prenatal screening for hemoglobinopathies is not obligatory during pregnancy in Italy, it is offered to women by the Italian National Health Service in the pre-conception phase. The screening of newborns is a valid alternative, and has been adopted in various European countries, albeit in a piecemeal fashion. Neonatal screening has the advantage of providing early diagnosis of a hemoglobinopathy. Here we report the findings from the experience with neonatal screening in Friuli-Venezia Giulia since 2010.

Materials and methods: The hemoglobinopathy screening project in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, a Region in north Italy, began in November 2010. High-performance liquid chromatography was performed on dried blood spot samples collected by obstetric nurses from neonates within 5-8 days after birth.

Results: From 2010 to 2019, 11,956 newborns were screened, and abnormal hemoglobin was found in 519 of them (4.34%): the variants identified included HbS, HbC, HbD, HbE and HbX. More specifically, the HbS variant was observed in 347 (2.9%) newborns and the homozygous pattern was identified in 24 (0.2%) cases. The screening also detected two cases of β-thalassemia major.

Discussion: We report our experience of 10 years of screening newborns for hemoglobinopathies in the Region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia, in which 7.7% of people come from malaria-endemic areas. Increased mobility and migratory flows bringing in hemoglobinopathy carriers from endemic areas have led to an increase in mutations in non-malarial countries, with a current incidence of around 4% in the newborns we tested. This means that hemoglobinopathies can be described as a rare condition. Our data show that incidence rates are comparable to those of other inherited disorders such as phenylketonuria, thereby justifying the inclusion of the test for hemoglobinopathies into screening programs for rare diseases.

Background: The impact of pathogen reduction technology (PRT) on metabolic and hemostatic profile of treated platelets remains a subject of debate. Platelets Additive Solutions (PASs) are suggested as more appropriate storage medium compared to plasma. To investigate this in terms of zero heterogeneity PRT-treated and control apheresis platelet concentrates (PCs), collected from the same donors and stored in PAS and plasma respectively, were analyzed.

Materials and methods: In the first arm of the study six double dose-apheresis PCs were produced, split and stored in plasma, while in the second arm six split double dose-apheresis PCs from the same donors, were produced and stored in PAS. Control and PRT-treated PCs resulted in both arms. Metabolic and hemostatic markers were evaluated in all the examined groups on days 1, 3 and 5.

Results: A time dependent increased metabolism both in PAS and plasma-stored PCs was evident in PRT-treated PCs. However, the metabolic profile was better preserved in PCs stored in PAS, as higher pH (6.8 vs 6.5, p=0.007) and lower lactate levels (12.6 vs 17.8 mmol/L, p=0.009) were documented in PRT-treated PAS-PCs compared to plasma-PCs, on day 5. A time dependent decreased hemostatic capacity regardless the storage medium was evident in PRT-treated PCs, (PAS-PCs MCF, p=0.004 and plasma-PCs MCF, p=0.007). Similar results were obtained in control PCs.

Discussion: The use of PAS preserves the metabolic profile of PCs more adequately compared to plasma but has no effect on the hemostatic profile. The clinical relevance of these findings needs further investigation.

Background: Cord blood platelets, easily obtained from blood units not suitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, represent an abundant source of growth factors for use in wound healing. Although several protocols have been described for platelet lysate production, no standard manufacturing protocol is available. The use of pooled cord blood platelets could thus facilitate standardization. In this study, the effect of varying concentrations (up to 20%) of a pooled pathogen-reduced lyophilized cord blood platelet lysate (PRL-CBPL) was investigated in different cell types involved in the wound healing process. The effect of heparin addition was also evaluated. In parallel, a comparison was performed with a single donor cord blood platelet lysate (SD-CBPL).

Materials and methods: The effect of PRL-CBPL on the viability and proliferation of different cell lines (L929 mouse fibroblasts and HaCaT keratinocytes) and human primary cells (fibroblasts-NHDF, coronary artery smooth muscle cells-HCASMC and coronary artery endothelial cells-HCAEC), on HaCaT migration and the chemotactic effect on human monocytes (THP-1) was evaluated.

Results: PRL-CBPL showed a lower PDGF-AB amount compared to SD-CBPL. Differing concentrations of both CBPL were necessary to influence cell viability and proliferation. 3% was the optimal concentration for L929 and HaCaT as well as for NHDF and HCASMC, while HCAEC required 10%. The effect of added heparin was more evident on SD-CBPL and in particular on NHDF and HCASMC proliferation. Keratinocyte scratch closure was obtained with 3 and 5% PRL-CBPL and SD-CBPL respectively. Both CBPLs caused an increase in the number of migrated THP-1 monocytes in a concentration-dependent manner up to 20% with a higher monocyte migration for SD-CBPL with respect to PRL-CBPL and in cells treated with heparin.

Discussion: The data obtained suggest that PRL-CBPL is an effective standardized alternative to SD-CBPL.

Background: Anaphylaxis after blood transfusion is a feared complication accounting for severe morbidity. A retrospective study was performed at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, to investigate the rate and features of transfusion-associated anaphylaxis (TAA) occurring between 2002-2021.

Materials and methods: Identified cases of TAA were studied by an immunologist and an allergist to extract information about general characteristics, amplifying factors, co-morbidity, treatment, and treatment responses. TAA was reported as perioperative or non-perioperative.

Results: We identified 29 cases of TAA: 13 perioperative and 16 non-perioperative. Allergic transfusion reaction had an incidence rate of 34/100,000 transfusions and TAA a rate of 7/100,000 transfusions. The incidence of allergic reactions and TAA increased 2.6- and 6.4-fold during the study period. The first perioperative TAA was discovered 12 years into the study period but was equally frequent as non-perioperative transfusion-associated anaphylaxis in the last five years of the study period. 52% of the TAA cases had relevant co-morbidity and 100% of them had amplifying factors. Although only 38% of the non-perioperative patients received epinephrine as treatment, 94% of them had a good treatment response to their total treatment regimen. Poorer treatment response was observed with higher age, more cardiovascular- and respiratory disease, higher use of amplifying and sedating medications and a higher severity score.

Discussion: Our findings indicate that TAA, especially in the perioperative setting, is underdiagnosed. The increased incidence of TAA in our study is temporally related to the introduction of a national hemovigilance program, introduction of standardized laboratory testing for anaphylaxis and increased multidisciplinary focus on the condition. In conclusion, increased awareness of TAA, and especially in the perioperative setting, is needed. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to improve identification and reporting of TAA.

Background: Pediatric Patient Blood Management (PBM) programs require continuous surveillance of errors and near misses. However, most PBM programs rely on passive surveillance methods. Our objective was to develop and evaluate a set of automated trigger tools for active surveillance of pediatric PBM errors.

Materials and methods: We used the Rand-UCLA method with an expert panel of pediatric transfusion medicine specialists to identify and prioritize candidate trigger tools for all transfused blood products. We then iteratively developed automated queries of electronic health record (EHR) data for the highest priority triggers. Two physicians manually reviewed a subset of cases meeting trigger tool criteria and estimated each trigger tool's positive predictive value (PPV). We then estimated the rate of PBM errors, whether they reached the patient, and adverse events for each trigger tool across four years in a single pediatric health system.

Results: We identified 28 potential triggers for pediatric PBM errors and developed 5 automated trigger tools (positive patient identification, missing irradiation, unwashed products despite prior anaphylaxis, transfusion lasting >4 hours, over-transfusion by volume). The PPV for ordering errors ranged from 38-100%. The most frequently detected near miss event reaching patients was first transfusions without positive patient identification (estimate 303, 95% CI: 288-318 per year). The only adverse events detected were from over-transfusions by volume, including 4 adverse events detected on manual review that had not been reported in passive surveillance systems.

Discussion: It is feasible to automatically detect pediatric PBM errors using existing data captured in the EHR that enable active surveillance systems. Over-transfusions may be one of the most frequent causes of harm in the pediatric environment.