Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0163
Idir Ouzaid, Pierre-Etienne Gabriel, Byron Lee, Gauthier Delporte, Philippe Puech, Laurent Lemaitre, Evanguelos Xylinas, Arnauld Villers, Georges-Pascal Haber
Objective: To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and selective arterial embolization (SAE) for the treatment of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma (AML).
Patients and methods: The outcomes of patients who were managed by RALPN (n = 191) or SAE (n = 51) for sporadic renal AML were matched (2:1) using a propensity score for analyses. The primary endpoint was therapeutic success defined as the absence of secondary treatment. Secondary endpoints were post-operative complications and renal function preservation (loss of eGFR at 6 months). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to predict factors associated with re-intervention.
Results: Patients baseline characteristics in the matched population (RALP, n=96 vs. SAE, n=48) were balanced. LOS was shorter (mean: 4.2 vs. 3.1 days; p = 0.004) and EBL was lower (327 mL vs. 0 mL, p < 0.0001) in the SAE group. Overall (PN: 15.2% vs. AES: 11.7% p = 0.09) and Clavien-Dindo stratified (p = 0.62) complications were similar in both groups. After a comparable mean follow-up time (33 vs. 40 months, p = 0.63), there was an overall mean loss of eGFR of 7.7±26 mL/min/1.73m2 (p = 0.001). This loss was similar between the two groups (PN: 6.87±26 vs. AES: 11.56±23, p = 0.36). After adjusting for identified confounding factors including tumor size, type of primary intervention (RALPN vs SAE) was the only predictive factor for secondary intervention.
Conclusion: RALPN was associated with decreased need for secondary treatment with no increase in morbidity compared with SAE.
目的:比较机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RALPN)和选择性动脉栓塞(SAE)治疗散发性肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(AML)的效果。患者和方法:采用RALPN (n = 191)或SAE (n = 51)治疗散发性肾性AML的患者的结果使用倾向评分进行匹配(2:1)。主要终点是治疗成功,定义为没有二次治疗。次要终点是术后并发症和肾功能保存(6个月时eGFR丢失)。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析预测再干预相关因素。结果:匹配人群中患者的基线特征(RALP, n=96 vs. SAE, n=48)是平衡的。LOS较短(平均4.2天vs. 3.1天;p = 0.004), SAE组EBL较低(327 mL vs. 0 mL, p < 0.0001)。两组总并发症(PN: 15.2% vs AES: 11.7% p = 0.09)和Clavien-Dindo分层并发症(p = 0.62)相似。在相当的平均随访时间(33个月vs 40个月,p = 0.63)后,eGFR的总体平均损失为7.7±26 mL/min/1.73m2 (p = 0.001)。两组之间的损失相似(PN: 6.87±26 vs AES: 11.56±23,p = 0.36)。在调整确定的混杂因素(包括肿瘤大小)后,主要干预类型(RALPN vs SAE)是次要干预的唯一预测因素。结论:与SAE相比,RALPN与降低二次治疗需求相关,且发病率没有增加。
{"title":"Arterial Embolization versus Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Angiomyolipomas.","authors":"Idir Ouzaid, Pierre-Etienne Gabriel, Byron Lee, Gauthier Delporte, Philippe Puech, Laurent Lemaitre, Evanguelos Xylinas, Arnauld Villers, Georges-Pascal Haber","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0163","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and selective arterial embolization (SAE) for the treatment of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma (AML).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The outcomes of patients who were managed by RALPN (n = 191) or SAE (n = 51) for sporadic renal AML were matched (2:1) using a propensity score for analyses. The primary endpoint was therapeutic success defined as the absence of secondary treatment. Secondary endpoints were post-operative complications and renal function preservation (loss of eGFR at 6 months). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to predict factors associated with re-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients baseline characteristics in the matched population (RALP, n=96 vs. SAE, n=48) were balanced. LOS was shorter (mean: 4.2 vs. 3.1 days; p = 0.004) and EBL was lower (327 mL vs. 0 mL, p < 0.0001) in the SAE group. Overall (PN: 15.2% vs. AES: 11.7% p = 0.09) and Clavien-Dindo stratified (p = 0.62) complications were similar in both groups. After a comparable mean follow-up time (33 vs. 40 months, p = 0.63), there was an overall mean loss of eGFR of 7.7±26 mL/min/1.73m2 (p = 0.001). This loss was similar between the two groups (PN: 6.87±26 vs. AES: 11.56±23, p = 0.36). After adjusting for identified confounding factors including tumor size, type of primary intervention (RALPN vs SAE) was the only predictive factor for secondary intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RALPN was associated with decreased need for secondary treatment with no increase in morbidity compared with SAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539891/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144289736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0125
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Doreen Trebst, Theodoros Spinos, Toni Franz, Anja Dietel, Stefan Siemer, Matheus Miranda Paiva, Evangelos Liatsikos, Ho Thi Phuc
Purpose: Ureterocalicostomy refers to the anastomosis of the lower pole calyces with the ureter after excision of the hydronephrotic lower renal pole (1, 2). Indications for ureterocalicostomy include previous failed pyeloplasty, ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with anatomical abnormalities, such as intrarenal pelvis or short ureter (3) and proximal ureteral strictures (4). The purpose of this video is to demonstrate the technique of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterocalicostomy (RALUC) in a patient with UPJO and intrarenal pelvis.
Materials and methods: Preoperatively, a retrograde ureteropyelography was performed. A transperitoneal approach with the Hassan technique was used, followed by the introduction of four additional DaVinci® trocars. The first step of the procedure is dissection of the retroperitoneum, the proximal ureter and lower part of the kidney including the renal hilum. The proximal ureter is dissected below the stricture. The lower pole artery is selectively bulldogged, and the lower pole of the kidney is resected in a circular manner to get broad based access to the lowest calix. The "Garland" suture technique is used to control hemostasis of the lower pole of the kidney. Therefore, a running, "low tension", circular suture is performed along the whole renal defect. This provides sufficient parenchymal hemostasis without narrowing the access to the lower calix. The ureter is then spatulated and sutured to the lower calix. The video shows step by step the ureterocalical anastomosis in single knot technique and explains tips and tricks.
Results: Total operative time was 114 minutes, while estimated blood loss was 25 mL. The JJ catheter was removed at 40 days postoperatively, while an ultrasound was performed after the JJ removal, showing no hydronephrosis. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. The creatinine count and GFR after JJ removal were 92 μmoL/L and 70 ml/min, respectively. During the last follow-up the patient remained asymptomatic and had a mild chronical dilatation of the caliceal system but no hydronephrosis.
Conclusions: This video demonstrates the effectiveness and repeatability of RALUC for reconstructing UPJO in patients with very narrow or intrarenal pelvis. RALUC is a feasible, safe and efficient approach for selected patients requiring reconstruction of the upper urinary tract.
{"title":"Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Ureterocalicostomy (RALUC): How we do it.","authors":"Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Doreen Trebst, Theodoros Spinos, Toni Franz, Anja Dietel, Stefan Siemer, Matheus Miranda Paiva, Evangelos Liatsikos, Ho Thi Phuc","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0125","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ureterocalicostomy refers to the anastomosis of the lower pole calyces with the ureter after excision of the hydronephrotic lower renal pole (1, 2). Indications for ureterocalicostomy include previous failed pyeloplasty, ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with anatomical abnormalities, such as intrarenal pelvis or short ureter (3) and proximal ureteral strictures (4). The purpose of this video is to demonstrate the technique of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterocalicostomy (RALUC) in a patient with UPJO and intrarenal pelvis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Preoperatively, a retrograde ureteropyelography was performed. A transperitoneal approach with the Hassan technique was used, followed by the introduction of four additional DaVinci® trocars. The first step of the procedure is dissection of the retroperitoneum, the proximal ureter and lower part of the kidney including the renal hilum. The proximal ureter is dissected below the stricture. The lower pole artery is selectively bulldogged, and the lower pole of the kidney is resected in a circular manner to get broad based access to the lowest calix. The \"Garland\" suture technique is used to control hemostasis of the lower pole of the kidney. Therefore, a running, \"low tension\", circular suture is performed along the whole renal defect. This provides sufficient parenchymal hemostasis without narrowing the access to the lower calix. The ureter is then spatulated and sutured to the lower calix. The video shows step by step the ureterocalical anastomosis in single knot technique and explains tips and tricks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total operative time was 114 minutes, while estimated blood loss was 25 mL. The JJ catheter was removed at 40 days postoperatively, while an ultrasound was performed after the JJ removal, showing no hydronephrosis. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. The creatinine count and GFR after JJ removal were 92 μmoL/L and 70 ml/min, respectively. During the last follow-up the patient remained asymptomatic and had a mild chronical dilatation of the caliceal system but no hydronephrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This video demonstrates the effectiveness and repeatability of RALUC for reconstructing UPJO in patients with very narrow or intrarenal pelvis. RALUC is a feasible, safe and efficient approach for selected patients requiring reconstruction of the upper urinary tract.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539875/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143736265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0166
Marie-Christin Reich, Natalie Heide, Peter Corrêa Humaidan, Sandro C Esteves
Leukocytospermia, defined as ≥1×10⁶ white blood cells (WBC)/ml of semen, is a condition frequently observed in infertile men. While symptomatic leukocytospermia is often associated with genital tract infections and managed accordingly, the clinical significance of asymptomatic leukocytospermia remains uncertain-particularly in the setting of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Seminal leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, play a physiological role in immune surveillance and tissue homeostasis. However, when excessively activated, they may generate high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), contributing to oxidative stress, sperm dysfunction, and DNA damage. This narrative review critically examines whether asymptomatic leukocytospermia adversely affects ART outcomes, including fertilization, embryo development, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. A synthesis of current evidence-including meta-analyses and large retrospective studies-suggests that asymptomatic leukocytospermia does not negatively impact these outcomes. Moreover, standard sperm preparation techniques and the widespread use of ICSI appear to neutralize any potential deleterious effects from seminal leukocytes. Given the absence of compelling evidence supporting its harmful impact on ART success, routine treatment of asymptomatic leukocytospermia-particularly with empiric antibiotics-is not recommended. Such interventions may disturb the natural immune balance, promote antibiotic resistance, and increase healthcare burdens without demonstrable benefit. Nonetheless, selective treatment may be justified in specific scenarios, such as recurrent implantation failure or early pregnancy loss. Further research is warranted to standardize leukocyte detection methods and to clarify the role of adjunctive therapies. Until more definitive data emerge, an individualized, evidence-based approach remains the most appropriate strategy for managing asymptomatic leukocytospermia in infertile men pursuing ART.
{"title":"Asymptomatic Leukocytospermia and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: Reason for concern?","authors":"Marie-Christin Reich, Natalie Heide, Peter Corrêa Humaidan, Sandro C Esteves","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0166","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0166","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leukocytospermia, defined as ≥1×10⁶ white blood cells (WBC)/ml of semen, is a condition frequently observed in infertile men. While symptomatic leukocytospermia is often associated with genital tract infections and managed accordingly, the clinical significance of asymptomatic leukocytospermia remains uncertain-particularly in the setting of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Seminal leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, play a physiological role in immune surveillance and tissue homeostasis. However, when excessively activated, they may generate high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), contributing to oxidative stress, sperm dysfunction, and DNA damage. This narrative review critically examines whether asymptomatic leukocytospermia adversely affects ART outcomes, including fertilization, embryo development, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. A synthesis of current evidence-including meta-analyses and large retrospective studies-suggests that asymptomatic leukocytospermia does not negatively impact these outcomes. Moreover, standard sperm preparation techniques and the widespread use of ICSI appear to neutralize any potential deleterious effects from seminal leukocytes. Given the absence of compelling evidence supporting its harmful impact on ART success, routine treatment of asymptomatic leukocytospermia-particularly with empiric antibiotics-is not recommended. Such interventions may disturb the natural immune balance, promote antibiotic resistance, and increase healthcare burdens without demonstrable benefit. Nonetheless, selective treatment may be justified in specific scenarios, such as recurrent implantation failure or early pregnancy loss. Further research is warranted to standardize leukocyte detection methods and to clarify the role of adjunctive therapies. Until more definitive data emerge, an individualized, evidence-based approach remains the most appropriate strategy for managing asymptomatic leukocytospermia in infertile men pursuing ART.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539881/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144053498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.05.01
Luciano A Favorito
{"title":"International Brazilian of Urology is the Seventh Biggest Impact Factor (4.5) Among Urology and Andrology Journals in the World.","authors":"Luciano A Favorito","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.05.01","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.05.01","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144627538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0195.1
Luciano A Favorito
{"title":"Importance of Penile Vascularization in Live Donor Penile Transplantation.","authors":"Luciano A Favorito","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0195.1","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0195.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551651/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144627537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0223
Sandro C Esteves, Marina C Viana, Augusto B Reis, Filipe Tenório Lira, Thiago Afonso Teixeira, João Paulo Camarço, Matheus Gröner, Antônio José T Paula, Alberto C Stein, Maria Gabriela F Mulato, Jorge Hallak, Renato Fraietta
{"title":"Male Infertility: Diagnostic Approach - A Committee Opinion.","authors":"Sandro C Esteves, Marina C Viana, Augusto B Reis, Filipe Tenório Lira, Thiago Afonso Teixeira, João Paulo Camarço, Matheus Gröner, Antônio José T Paula, Alberto C Stein, Maria Gabriela F Mulato, Jorge Hallak, Renato Fraietta","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0223","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0223","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144003054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0100
Francisco Jazon de Araújo, Frank Robisom Costa de Sousa, Camille Rodrigues Aggensteiner, Gabriel Bruno Jácome de Melo, Pedro Aquiles Souza das Chagas, Thomas Silva de Queiroz, Rafael Paiva Arruda, Francisco Eugênio Vasconcelos, Paulo Silveira Campos Soares, Cristiano Araújo Costa, João Pompeu Frota Magalhães, Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão
Purpose: This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of the Bricker and Wallace techniques, focusing on updating previously unassessed clinical outcomes to inform surgical decision-making.
Material and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, with the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024621076). Searches in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library included Randomized Clinical Trials and cohort studies comparing both anastomosis techniques. Analyses used Odds Ratio (OR) and mean differences with a random-effects model.
Results: Fourteen studies with 1,903 patients (980 Bricker; 923 Wallace) were included. No significant difference was found in overall stricture rates. However, the Bricker technique had more unilateral strictures (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30-0.75; p < 0.01), while the Wallace technique had lower stricture rates in patients who underwent ileal-conduit urinary diversion (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.19-0.64; p < 0.001), and patients without prior radiotherapy (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.14-0.61; p < 0.001). Wallace also presented reduced hydronephrosis (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17-0.79; p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in patients undergoing neobladder diversion or those with bladder cancer.
Conclusion: No difference in main analyses of stricture rates was found, supporting that technique choice should rely on surgeon preference and expertise. Therefore, beyond surgeon preference, the choice of technique should consider the patient's history of radiotherapy, and the type of urinary diversion planned, aiming to optimize postoperative outcomes and minimize the risk of specific complications.
目的:本荟萃分析比较了Bricker和Wallace技术的有效性和安全性,重点关注更新以前未评估的临床结果,以告知手术决策。材料和方法:系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA和Cochrane指南,协议在PROSPERO (CRD42024621076)。在MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中检索包括比较两种吻合技术的随机临床试验和队列研究。分析使用优势比(OR)和随机效应模型的平均差异。结果:14项研究纳入1903例患者(980例Bricker;923华莱士)包括在内。总体狭窄率无显著差异。然而,Bricker技术有更多的单侧狭窄(OR 0.47;95% ci 0.30-0.75;p < 0.01),而Wallace技术在行回肠-导管尿分流的患者中狭窄率较低(OR 0.35;95% ci 0.19-0.64;p < 0.001),未接受过放疗的患者(OR 0.29;95% ci 0.14-0.61;P < 0.001)。华莱士也表现出肾积水减少(OR 0.37;95% ci 0.17-0.79;P < 0.05)。在接受新膀胱转移的患者和膀胱癌患者中没有观察到显著差异。结论:主要分析结果显示狭窄率无差异,支持手术技术的选择应根据术者的喜好和专业知识。因此,除了外科医生的偏好外,技术的选择还应考虑患者的放疗史和计划的尿分流类型,以优化术后效果并最大限度地减少特定并发症的风险。
{"title":"New Evidence on an Old Question: a Meta-Analysis of Wallace versus Bricker Anastomoses.","authors":"Francisco Jazon de Araújo, Frank Robisom Costa de Sousa, Camille Rodrigues Aggensteiner, Gabriel Bruno Jácome de Melo, Pedro Aquiles Souza das Chagas, Thomas Silva de Queiroz, Rafael Paiva Arruda, Francisco Eugênio Vasconcelos, Paulo Silveira Campos Soares, Cristiano Araújo Costa, João Pompeu Frota Magalhães, Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0100","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of the Bricker and Wallace techniques, focusing on updating previously unassessed clinical outcomes to inform surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, with the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024621076). Searches in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library included Randomized Clinical Trials and cohort studies comparing both anastomosis techniques. Analyses used Odds Ratio (OR) and mean differences with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies with 1,903 patients (980 Bricker; 923 Wallace) were included. No significant difference was found in overall stricture rates. However, the Bricker technique had more unilateral strictures (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30-0.75; p < 0.01), while the Wallace technique had lower stricture rates in patients who underwent ileal-conduit urinary diversion (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.19-0.64; p < 0.001), and patients without prior radiotherapy (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.14-0.61; p < 0.001). Wallace also presented reduced hydronephrosis (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17-0.79; p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in patients undergoing neobladder diversion or those with bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No difference in main analyses of stricture rates was found, supporting that technique choice should rely on surgeon preference and expertise. Therefore, beyond surgeon preference, the choice of technique should consider the patient's history of radiotherapy, and the type of urinary diversion planned, aiming to optimize postoperative outcomes and minimize the risk of specific complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144310679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0082
Marcio Covas Moschovas, Shady Saikali, Travis Rogers, Mischa Dohler, Michael Mcdonald, Ela Patel, Jeffrey Marquinez, Ahmed Gamal, Jeffery Magnuson, Vipul Patel
Introduction: The 2001 Lindbergh operation provided evidence for the feasibility of transatlantic telesurgery.(1-3) However, technological and economic challenges have limited the implementation of this technique.(4-6) This video illustrates details of a telesurgery connection over a 13,000 km distance between Orlando (USA) and Shanghai (China). Surgeons at both locations operated simultaneously on the same animals using telesurgery consoles (MicroPort® MedBot™) for teleproctoring, allowing for a robust evaluation of connectivity and robotic system performance across vast distances.
Methods: On July 23rd and 24th, 2024, we conducted a prospective telesurgery study using live animal models (porcine) connecting Orlando to Shanghai. We reproduced a real-life telesurgery scenario where both ends of the connection had control over the robot. Four surgeons were in Orlando and one in Shanghai. We illustrated the communication between surgeons and highlighted the potential of telesurgery to improve outcomes and teaching robotic surgery.
Results: Connectivity and robotic technology performed optimally for several hours without troubleshooting or malfunctions. Median delay was 139 milliseconds (137-216) on the first day and 139 milliseconds (137-185) on the second day. The surgeons were able to switch the console control multiple times during the procedures. They could communicate, discuss cases in real-time, and seamlessly transfer control in critical steps of the surgery.
Conclusions: This video underscores the practical potential of Telesurgery use in teleproctoring, particularly when an experienced remote surgeon steps in to assist another surgeon during complex or challenging procedures. It highlights Telesurgery's potential for training and improving outcomes in robotic surgery.
{"title":"Enhancing Robotic Surgery Training and Reducing Remote Complications with Telesurgery Technology.","authors":"Marcio Covas Moschovas, Shady Saikali, Travis Rogers, Mischa Dohler, Michael Mcdonald, Ela Patel, Jeffrey Marquinez, Ahmed Gamal, Jeffery Magnuson, Vipul Patel","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0082","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2001 Lindbergh operation provided evidence for the feasibility of transatlantic telesurgery.(1-3) However, technological and economic challenges have limited the implementation of this technique.(4-6) This video illustrates details of a telesurgery connection over a 13,000 km distance between Orlando (USA) and Shanghai (China). Surgeons at both locations operated simultaneously on the same animals using telesurgery consoles (MicroPort® MedBot™) for teleproctoring, allowing for a robust evaluation of connectivity and robotic system performance across vast distances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On July 23rd and 24th, 2024, we conducted a prospective telesurgery study using live animal models (porcine) connecting Orlando to Shanghai. We reproduced a real-life telesurgery scenario where both ends of the connection had control over the robot. Four surgeons were in Orlando and one in Shanghai. We illustrated the communication between surgeons and highlighted the potential of telesurgery to improve outcomes and teaching robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Connectivity and robotic technology performed optimally for several hours without troubleshooting or malfunctions. Median delay was 139 milliseconds (137-216) on the first day and 139 milliseconds (137-185) on the second day. The surgeons were able to switch the console control multiple times during the procedures. They could communicate, discuss cases in real-time, and seamlessly transfer control in critical steps of the surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This video underscores the practical potential of Telesurgery use in teleproctoring, particularly when an experienced remote surgeon steps in to assist another surgeon during complex or challenging procedures. It highlights Telesurgery's potential for training and improving outcomes in robotic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143659413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0039
Guilherme Gentile, Fabio Carvalho Vicentini, Erik Montagna, Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Guilherme Pimenta Roncete, Artur Henrique Brito, Fabio Miranda Torricelli, Alexandre Danilovic, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Eduardo Mazzucchi, William Carlos Nahas
Purpose: The use of patient prioritization tools is one of several methods to enhance the management of waiting times for elective surgeries. Developing these tools specifically for urinary stones in the Brazilian context may enhance queue management and increase patient satisfaction. This study aims to adapt two previously published scores, the WCWL (Western Canada Waiting List - general criteria) and the SCQ-score (specific to urinary stone criteria), into Brazilian Portuguese.
Materials and methods: Our study adhered to established protocols for the cross-cultural adaptation and translation of health-related questionnaires. The process for translating both original scores involved four steps: initial translation, back-translation, committee review, and pre-testing. The translations were conducted by professionals proficient in the relevant languages. The pre-test phase engaged eight endourologists who applied the translated versions of the scores to twelve hypothetical patient cases.
Results: Our study successfully produced Brazilian Portuguese versions of the SCQ and WCWL scores. During the pre-testing, these scores were found to be quick to perform (with an average completion time of 1 minute and 35 seconds) and were deemed easy to understand and use by the endourologists. However, there was a concern regarding the practical utility and interpretability of the WCWL score due to its more generalized criteria.
Conclusion: We successfully developed the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Western Canada Waiting List and SCQ-score. This development will allow further studies to evaluate the impact of their use within the Brazilian healthcare environment.
{"title":"First Step to Equity and Organization in Waiting Lines for Stone Surgery. Translation of Prioritization Scores.","authors":"Guilherme Gentile, Fabio Carvalho Vicentini, Erik Montagna, Daniel Pérez-Fentes, Guilherme Pimenta Roncete, Artur Henrique Brito, Fabio Miranda Torricelli, Alexandre Danilovic, Carlos Alfredo Batagello, Eduardo Mazzucchi, William Carlos Nahas","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0039","DOIUrl":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of patient prioritization tools is one of several methods to enhance the management of waiting times for elective surgeries. Developing these tools specifically for urinary stones in the Brazilian context may enhance queue management and increase patient satisfaction. This study aims to adapt two previously published scores, the WCWL (Western Canada Waiting List - general criteria) and the SCQ-score (specific to urinary stone criteria), into Brazilian Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our study adhered to established protocols for the cross-cultural adaptation and translation of health-related questionnaires. The process for translating both original scores involved four steps: initial translation, back-translation, committee review, and pre-testing. The translations were conducted by professionals proficient in the relevant languages. The pre-test phase engaged eight endourologists who applied the translated versions of the scores to twelve hypothetical patient cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study successfully produced Brazilian Portuguese versions of the SCQ and WCWL scores. During the pre-testing, these scores were found to be quick to perform (with an average completion time of 1 minute and 35 seconds) and were deemed easy to understand and use by the endourologists. However, there was a concern regarding the practical utility and interpretability of the WCWL score due to its more generalized criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully developed the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Western Canada Waiting List and SCQ-score. This development will allow further studies to evaluate the impact of their use within the Brazilian healthcare environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144043954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}