Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.008
Christos Tsagkaris, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mazda Farshad, Caroline Passaplan, Frederic Cornaz, Jonas Widmer, José Miguel Spirig
Background context: Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used in spine surgery. Axial screw misplacement is a common complication. In addition to the recognized neurovascular risks associated with screw misplacement, the biomechanical stability of misplaced screws remains a subject of debate.
Purpose: The present study investigates whether screw misplacement in the lumbar spine reduces mechanical screw hold.
Study design/setting: Cadaveric biomechanical study.
Methods: Pedicle screw (mis)placement was planned for 12 fresh frozen cadaveric spines between the T12 and the L5 levels. The screws were then implanted into the vertebrae with the help of 3D-printed template guides. Pre- and postinstrumentation computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired for instrumentation planning and quantification of the misplacement. The instrumented vertebrae were potted into CT transparent boxes using Polymethyl methacrylate and mounted on a standardized biomechanical setup for pull-out (PO) testing with uniaxial tensile load.
Results: The bone density of all the specimens as per HU was comparable. The predicted pull-out force (POF) for screws medially misplaced by 2 , 4, and 6 mm was respectively 985 N (SD 474), 968 N (SD 476) and 822 N (SD 478). For screws laterally misplaced by 2 , 4, and 6 mm the POF was respectively 605 N (SD 473), 411 N (SD 475), and 334 N (SD 477). Screws that did not perforate the pedicle (control) resisted pull-out forces of 837 N (SD 471).
Conclusions: Medial misplacement is associated with increased axial screw hold against static loads compared to correctly placed screws and laterally placed screws.
Clinical significance: In clinical settings, the reinsertion of medially misplaced screws should primarily aim to prevent neurological complications while the reinsertion of lateral misplaced screws should aim to prevent screw loosening.
{"title":"Stability of medially and laterally malpositioned screws: a biomechanical study on cadavers.","authors":"Christos Tsagkaris, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mazda Farshad, Caroline Passaplan, Frederic Cornaz, Jonas Widmer, José Miguel Spirig","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used in spine surgery. Axial screw misplacement is a common complication. In addition to the recognized neurovascular risks associated with screw misplacement, the biomechanical stability of misplaced screws remains a subject of debate.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study investigates whether screw misplacement in the lumbar spine reduces mechanical screw hold.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Cadaveric biomechanical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pedicle screw (mis)placement was planned for 12 fresh frozen cadaveric spines between the T12 and the L5 levels. The screws were then implanted into the vertebrae with the help of 3D-printed template guides. Pre- and postinstrumentation computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired for instrumentation planning and quantification of the misplacement. The instrumented vertebrae were potted into CT transparent boxes using Polymethyl methacrylate and mounted on a standardized biomechanical setup for pull-out (PO) testing with uniaxial tensile load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bone density of all the specimens as per HU was comparable. The predicted pull-out force (POF) for screws medially misplaced by 2 , 4, and 6 mm was respectively 985 N (SD 474), 968 N (SD 476) and 822 N (SD 478). For screws laterally misplaced by 2 , 4, and 6 mm the POF was respectively 605 N (SD 473), 411 N (SD 475), and 334 N (SD 477). Screws that did not perforate the pedicle (control) resisted pull-out forces of 837 N (SD 471).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medial misplacement is associated with increased axial screw hold against static loads compared to correctly placed screws and laterally placed screws.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In clinical settings, the reinsertion of medially misplaced screws should primarily aim to prevent neurological complications while the reinsertion of lateral misplaced screws should aim to prevent screw loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"380-388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.013
Teija Lund, Leena Ristolainen, Hannu Kautiainen, Martina Lohman, Dietrich Schlenzka
Background context: Low back pain (LBP) among children and adolescents is a growing global concern. Disc degeneration (DD) is considered a significant factor in the clinical symptom of LBP. Both LBP and DD become more prevalent as adolescents transition into emerging adulthood. However, the relationship between growth during the pubertal growth spurt and the morphology of lumbar discs has yet to be elucidated.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the relationship between bodily growth during the pubertal growth spurt and the morphology of lumbar discs at age 18.
Study design: This study was a prospective longitudinal cohort study.
Patient sample: A randomly selected cohort of healthy children was examined at ages 8, 11, and 18. Participants with complete data sets (semi-structured interview, anthropometric measurements and lumbar spine MRI) at age 11 and 18 were included in this analysis (n=59).
Outcome measures: The morphological characteristics of lumbar discs were evaluated on MRI. Anthropometric measures including height, sitting height and weight were obtained to calculate the Body Surface Area (BSA) and the Body Mass Index (BMI).
Methods: The morphology of the lumbar discs was evaluated on T2-weighted midsagittal MRI using the Pfirrmann classification. A disc with a Pfirrmann grade of 3 or higher was considered degenerated at age 18. The relationship between relative growth between ages 11 and 18 (adjusted to sex and baseline values) and DD at age 18 was assessed. To analyze the relationship between the relative increase in BSA and DD, the participants were categorized into three equal-sized categories (tertiles). For all other anthropometric measures, the analysis was based on the relative increase in each measure between ages 11 and 18.
Results: In the highest tertile of relative increase in BSA (≥43%), 76% of participants had at least 1 disc with a Pfirrmann grade 3 or higher at age 18 while only 10% and 21% of participants in the lowest and medium tertiles had DD, respectively. The sex- and baseline-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for DD at age 18 for every additional 10% increase in BSA was 1.08 (1.02-1.15). The sex- and baseline-adjusted OR (95% CI) for DD at age 18 was 10.5 (1.60-68.7) and 7.92 (1.19-52.72) with every additional 10% increase in height and sitting height, respectively. For every additional 10% increase in weight, the adjusted OR for DD at age 18 was 1.51 (1.12-2.04) and for BMI 1.05 (1.01-1.09).
Conclusions: More relative growth between ages 11 and 18 is significantly associated with the occurrence of DD in emerging adulthood. Among the measures investigated, height and sitting height are nonmodifiable. Maintaining an ideal body weight during the pubertal growth spurt may be beneficial for the health of the lumbar discs.
{"title":"Bodily growth and the intervertebral disc: a longitudinal MRI study in healthy adolescents.","authors":"Teija Lund, Leena Ristolainen, Hannu Kautiainen, Martina Lohman, Dietrich Schlenzka","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) among children and adolescents is a growing global concern. Disc degeneration (DD) is considered a significant factor in the clinical symptom of LBP. Both LBP and DD become more prevalent as adolescents transition into emerging adulthood. However, the relationship between growth during the pubertal growth spurt and the morphology of lumbar discs has yet to be elucidated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the relationship between bodily growth during the pubertal growth spurt and the morphology of lumbar discs at age 18.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study was a prospective longitudinal cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>A randomly selected cohort of healthy children was examined at ages 8, 11, and 18. Participants with complete data sets (semi-structured interview, anthropometric measurements and lumbar spine MRI) at age 11 and 18 were included in this analysis (n=59).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The morphological characteristics of lumbar discs were evaluated on MRI. Anthropometric measures including height, sitting height and weight were obtained to calculate the Body Surface Area (BSA) and the Body Mass Index (BMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The morphology of the lumbar discs was evaluated on T2-weighted midsagittal MRI using the Pfirrmann classification. A disc with a Pfirrmann grade of 3 or higher was considered degenerated at age 18. The relationship between relative growth between ages 11 and 18 (adjusted to sex and baseline values) and DD at age 18 was assessed. To analyze the relationship between the relative increase in BSA and DD, the participants were categorized into three equal-sized categories (tertiles). For all other anthropometric measures, the analysis was based on the relative increase in each measure between ages 11 and 18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the highest tertile of relative increase in BSA (≥43%), 76% of participants had at least 1 disc with a Pfirrmann grade 3 or higher at age 18 while only 10% and 21% of participants in the lowest and medium tertiles had DD, respectively. The sex- and baseline-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for DD at age 18 for every additional 10% increase in BSA was 1.08 (1.02-1.15). The sex- and baseline-adjusted OR (95% CI) for DD at age 18 was 10.5 (1.60-68.7) and 7.92 (1.19-52.72) with every additional 10% increase in height and sitting height, respectively. For every additional 10% increase in weight, the adjusted OR for DD at age 18 was 1.51 (1.12-2.04) and for BMI 1.05 (1.01-1.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More relative growth between ages 11 and 18 is significantly associated with the occurrence of DD in emerging adulthood. Among the measures investigated, height and sitting height are nonmodifiable. Maintaining an ideal body weight during the pubertal growth spurt may be beneficial for the health of the lumbar discs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"317-323"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.019
Sleiman Haddad, Caglar Yilgor, Eva Jacobs, Lluis Vila, Susana Nuñez-Pereira, Manuel Ramirez Valencia, Anika Pupak, Maggie Barcheni, Javier Pizones, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstuck, Ibrahim Obeid, Ferran Pellisé
<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Mechanical complications (MC) are frequently linked to suboptimal postoperative alignment and represent a primary driver of revision surgery in the context of adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, it's worth noting that even among those deemed "well aligned," the risk of experiencing MCs persists, hinting at the potential influence of factors beyond alignment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to assess the incidence of MCs among well-aligned patients and delving into the relevant risk factors and surgical outcomes that come into play within this specific subgroup.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a prospective multicenter database dedicated to ASD.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study focused on patients aged 55 years or older, who had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, and exhibited a Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score of 2 points or less (excluding age) within 6 weeks of their index surgery.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Mechanical complications such as rod fractures, pseudarthrosis, or junctional kyphosis or failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who developed mechanical complications were identified. Comparative analyses were performed, encompassing both continuous and categorical variables. Furthermore, binary logistic regression tests were employed to pinpoint risk factors, and ROC curves were used to determine the optimal threshold values for these variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, with a mean age of 66 years. On average, they had 10 instrumented levels, and 77% of them had fusion extending to the pelvis. Additionally, 27% of the patients had undergone 3-column osteotomies (3-CO). Among them, 33 patients (40%) experienced at least 1 MC during an average follow-up period of 4 years, which included 14 cases of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and 20 cases of nonunion or rod breakage. 15 patients (18%) required revision surgery specifically for MC. In univariable analyses, patients who developed MC were characterized by higher body weight, poorer baseline general health (as indicated by worse SF-36 scores), and less favorable preoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. They also had longer hospital stays, a greater number of instrumented levels, and achieved less favorable postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. Interestingly, factors such as 3-column osteotomies, postoperative bracing, and the addition of an anterior approach did not significantly alter the risk of MC in well-aligned ASD patients. Binary regression models revealed that independent risk factors for MC included the residual coronal lumbosacral curve, the number of instrumented levels, and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA). ROC curves identified an optimal threshold of a residual lumbosacral curve of ≤4° and RSA of ≤3°. Moreover,
{"title":"Long-term mechanical failure in well aligned adult spinal deformity patients.","authors":"Sleiman Haddad, Caglar Yilgor, Eva Jacobs, Lluis Vila, Susana Nuñez-Pereira, Manuel Ramirez Valencia, Anika Pupak, Maggie Barcheni, Javier Pizones, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstuck, Ibrahim Obeid, Ferran Pellisé","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Mechanical complications (MC) are frequently linked to suboptimal postoperative alignment and represent a primary driver of revision surgery in the context of adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, it's worth noting that even among those deemed \"well aligned,\" the risk of experiencing MCs persists, hinting at the potential influence of factors beyond alignment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to assess the incidence of MCs among well-aligned patients and delving into the relevant risk factors and surgical outcomes that come into play within this specific subgroup.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a prospective multicenter database dedicated to ASD.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The study focused on patients aged 55 years or older, who had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, and exhibited a Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score of 2 points or less (excluding age) within 6 weeks of their index surgery.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Mechanical complications such as rod fractures, pseudarthrosis, or junctional kyphosis or failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who developed mechanical complications were identified. Comparative analyses were performed, encompassing both continuous and categorical variables. Furthermore, binary logistic regression tests were employed to pinpoint risk factors, and ROC curves were used to determine the optimal threshold values for these variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, with a mean age of 66 years. On average, they had 10 instrumented levels, and 77% of them had fusion extending to the pelvis. Additionally, 27% of the patients had undergone 3-column osteotomies (3-CO). Among them, 33 patients (40%) experienced at least 1 MC during an average follow-up period of 4 years, which included 14 cases of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and 20 cases of nonunion or rod breakage. 15 patients (18%) required revision surgery specifically for MC. In univariable analyses, patients who developed MC were characterized by higher body weight, poorer baseline general health (as indicated by worse SF-36 scores), and less favorable preoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. They also had longer hospital stays, a greater number of instrumented levels, and achieved less favorable postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment. Interestingly, factors such as 3-column osteotomies, postoperative bracing, and the addition of an anterior approach did not significantly alter the risk of MC in well-aligned ASD patients. Binary regression models revealed that independent risk factors for MC included the residual coronal lumbosacral curve, the number of instrumented levels, and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA). ROC curves identified an optimal threshold of a residual lumbosacral curve of ≤4° and RSA of ≤3°. Moreover,","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"337-346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-28DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.021
Shiming Xie, Liqiang Cui, Chenglong Wang, Hongjun Liu, Yu Ye, Shuangquan Gong, Jingchi Li
<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) is a frequently observed complication after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture (OVCF). Studies have demonstrated that intervertebral cement leakage (ICL) can increase the incidence of AVF, but others have reached opposite conclusions. The stress concentration initially increases the risk of AVF, and dispersive concentrated stress is the main biomechanical function of the intervertebral disc (IVD).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to validate the hypothesis that direct contact between the leaked cement and adjacent bony endplate (BEP) can inhibit this biomechanical function, trigger adjacent vertebral stress concentration and increase the risk of AVF.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study and corresponding numerical mechanical simulations.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Clinical data from 97 OVCF patients treated by bone cement augmentation operations were reviewed in this study.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Clinical assessments involved measuring ICL and cement-BEP contact status in patients with and without AVF. Numerical simulations were conducted to compute stress values in adjacent vertebral body's BEP and cancellous bone under various body positions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Radiographic and demographic data of 97 OVCF patients (with an average follow-up period of 11.5 months) treated using bone cement augmentation operation were reviewed in the present study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with AVF and those without AVF. Bone cement leakage status was judged via 2 different methods: with or without IVD cement leakage and with and without adjacent vertebral endplate contact. The data from patients with and without AVF were compared, and the independent risk factors were identified through regression analysis. Patients without IVD cement leakage, with IVD cement leakage but without adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact, and with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact were simulated using a previously constructed and validated lumbar finite element model, and the biomechanical indicators related to the AVF were computed and recorded in these surgical models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic analysis revealed that the incidence of AVF was numerically higher, but was not significantly higher in patients with IVD cement leakage. In contrast, patients with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact had a significantly greater incidence of AVF, which has also been proven to be an independent risk factor for AVF. In addition, numerical mechanical simulations revealed an obvious stress concentration tendency (the higher maximum equivalent stress value) in the adjacent vertebral body in the model with endplate cement contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Direct adjacent vertebral endpl
{"title":"Contact between leaked cement and adjacent vertebral endplate induces a greater risk of adjacent vertebral fracture with vertebral bone cement augmentation biomechanically.","authors":"Shiming Xie, Liqiang Cui, Chenglong Wang, Hongjun Liu, Yu Ye, Shuangquan Gong, Jingchi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) is a frequently observed complication after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture (OVCF). Studies have demonstrated that intervertebral cement leakage (ICL) can increase the incidence of AVF, but others have reached opposite conclusions. The stress concentration initially increases the risk of AVF, and dispersive concentrated stress is the main biomechanical function of the intervertebral disc (IVD).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to validate the hypothesis that direct contact between the leaked cement and adjacent bony endplate (BEP) can inhibit this biomechanical function, trigger adjacent vertebral stress concentration and increase the risk of AVF.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study and corresponding numerical mechanical simulations.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Clinical data from 97 OVCF patients treated by bone cement augmentation operations were reviewed in this study.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Clinical assessments involved measuring ICL and cement-BEP contact status in patients with and without AVF. Numerical simulations were conducted to compute stress values in adjacent vertebral body's BEP and cancellous bone under various body positions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Radiographic and demographic data of 97 OVCF patients (with an average follow-up period of 11.5 months) treated using bone cement augmentation operation were reviewed in the present study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with AVF and those without AVF. Bone cement leakage status was judged via 2 different methods: with or without IVD cement leakage and with and without adjacent vertebral endplate contact. The data from patients with and without AVF were compared, and the independent risk factors were identified through regression analysis. Patients without IVD cement leakage, with IVD cement leakage but without adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact, and with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact were simulated using a previously constructed and validated lumbar finite element model, and the biomechanical indicators related to the AVF were computed and recorded in these surgical models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic analysis revealed that the incidence of AVF was numerically higher, but was not significantly higher in patients with IVD cement leakage. In contrast, patients with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact had a significantly greater incidence of AVF, which has also been proven to be an independent risk factor for AVF. In addition, numerical mechanical simulations revealed an obvious stress concentration tendency (the higher maximum equivalent stress value) in the adjacent vertebral body in the model with endplate cement contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Direct adjacent vertebral endpl","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"324-336"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031
Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Davin C Gong, Omkar S Anaspure, John T Strony, Ilyas Aleem
Background context: Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet this potential association has been understudied, with conflicting results to date.
Purpose: This study examines the hypothesis that adults with osteoporosis would have an increased risk of reoperation after ACDF compared to matched adults without osteoporosis.
Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.
Patient sample: Two matched cohorts (mean age: 62 years; 75% female), each with 1,019 patients, who underwent primary ACDF. Cohorts were determined by the presence or absence of a diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Outcome measures: Incidence of reoperation occurring over 4 years postoperatively, with our primary outcome being the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included risk and mean count of oral opioid prescriptions and risk of pseudoarthrosis.
Methods: We utilized the TriNetX network to identify adults undergoing their first ACDF from 2004 to 2020, excluding those with serious pathology, and divided patients into 2 cohorts: osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis. Patients were propensity matched according to key risk factors for reoperation.
Results: Patients with osteoporosis had no statistically significant or meaningful difference in risk of reoperation compared to nonosteoporotic patients over 4-years' follow-up [95% CI] (17.3% vs 16.5%; RR: 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p=.6361). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of pseudoarthrosis (26.5% vs 29.1%; RR: 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]; p=.1820), oral opioid prescription (75.0% vs 76.0%; RR: 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]; p=.6067), or mean oral opioid prescription count (11.5 vs 11.8; p=.7040).
Conclusions: Compared to matched nonosteoporosis controls, osteoporosis was not associated with a statistically significant or clinically meaningful increase in risk of reoperation in adults over 4 years after ACDF. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not associated with a significant or meaningful risk of pseudoarthrosis or oral opioid prescription after ACDF, although more research is needed for corroboration. Additional research is needed to clarify whether those with osteoporosis have meaningful differences in pain and function compared to those without osteoporosis following ACDF.
{"title":"Osteoporosis is not associated with reoperation or pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion through 4-years' follow-up: a retrospective cohort study of US academic health centers.","authors":"Anthony N Baumann, Robert J Trager, Davin C Gong, Omkar S Anaspure, John T Strony, Ilyas Aleem","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Osteoporosis has been proposed as a risk factor for reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet this potential association has been understudied, with conflicting results to date.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the hypothesis that adults with osteoporosis would have an increased risk of reoperation after ACDF compared to matched adults without osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Two matched cohorts (mean age: 62 years; 75% female), each with 1,019 patients, who underwent primary ACDF. Cohorts were determined by the presence or absence of a diagnosis of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of reoperation occurring over 4 years postoperatively, with our primary outcome being the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included risk and mean count of oral opioid prescriptions and risk of pseudoarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the TriNetX network to identify adults undergoing their first ACDF from 2004 to 2020, excluding those with serious pathology, and divided patients into 2 cohorts: osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis. Patients were propensity matched according to key risk factors for reoperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with osteoporosis had no statistically significant or meaningful difference in risk of reoperation compared to nonosteoporotic patients over 4-years' follow-up [95% CI] (17.3% vs 16.5%; RR: 1.05 [0.86, 1.27]; p=.6361). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of pseudoarthrosis (26.5% vs 29.1%; RR: 0.91 [0.79, 1.05]; p=.1820), oral opioid prescription (75.0% vs 76.0%; RR: 0.99 [0.94, 1.04]; p=.6067), or mean oral opioid prescription count (11.5 vs 11.8; p=.7040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to matched nonosteoporosis controls, osteoporosis was not associated with a statistically significant or clinically meaningful increase in risk of reoperation in adults over 4 years after ACDF. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not associated with a significant or meaningful risk of pseudoarthrosis or oral opioid prescription after ACDF, although more research is needed for corroboration. Additional research is needed to clarify whether those with osteoporosis have meaningful differences in pain and function compared to those without osteoporosis following ACDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"290-298"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-28DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.018
Francesco Petri, Omar K Mahmoud, Said El Zein, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Matteo Passerini, Felix E Diehn, Jared T Verdoorn, Aaron J Tande, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A Freedman, M Hassan Murad, Elie F Berbari
Background context: Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis (NVO) has seen a rise in incidence, yet clinical outcomes remain poor with high relapse rates and significant long-term sequelae. The 2015 IDSA Clinical Practice Guidelines initiated a surge in scholarly activity on NVO, revealing a patchwork of definitions and numerous synonyms used interchangeably for this syndrome.
Purpose: To systematically summarize these definitions, evaluate their content, distribution over time, and thematic clustering.
Study design/setting: Meta-epidemiological study with a systematic review of definitions.
Patients sample: An extensive search of multiple databases was conducted, targeting trials and cohort studies dating from 2005 to present, providing a definition for NVO and its synonyms.
Outcome measures: Analysis of the diagnostic criteria that composed the definitions and the breaking up of the definitions in the possible combinations of diagnostic criteria.
Methods: We pursued a thematic synthesis of the published definitions with Boolean logic, yielding single or multiple definitions per included study. Using 8 predefined diagnostic criteria, we standardized definitions, focusing on the minimum necessary combinations used. Definition components were visualized using Sankey diagrams.
Results: The literature search identified 8,460 references, leading to 171 studies reporting on 21,963 patients. Of these, 91.2% were retrospective, 7.6% prospective, and 1.2% RCTs. Most definitions originated from authors, with 29.2% referencing sources. We identified 92 unique combinations of diagnostic criteria across the literature. Thirteen main patterns emerged, with the most common being clinical features with imaging, followed by clinical features combined with imaging and microbiology, and lastly, imaging paired with microbiology.
Conclusions: Our findings underscore the need for a collaborative effort to develop standardized diagnostic criteria. We advocate for a future Delphi consensus among experts to establish a unified diagnostic framework for NVO, emphasizing the core components of clinical features and MRI while incorporating microbiological and histopathological insights to improve both patient outcomes and research advancements.
{"title":"Wide variability of the definitions used for native vertebral osteomyelitis: walking the path for a unified diagnostic framework with a meta-epidemiological approach.","authors":"Francesco Petri, Omar K Mahmoud, Said El Zein, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Matteo Passerini, Felix E Diehn, Jared T Verdoorn, Aaron J Tande, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A Freedman, M Hassan Murad, Elie F Berbari","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis (NVO) has seen a rise in incidence, yet clinical outcomes remain poor with high relapse rates and significant long-term sequelae. The 2015 IDSA Clinical Practice Guidelines initiated a surge in scholarly activity on NVO, revealing a patchwork of definitions and numerous synonyms used interchangeably for this syndrome.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically summarize these definitions, evaluate their content, distribution over time, and thematic clustering.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Meta-epidemiological study with a systematic review of definitions.</p><p><strong>Patients sample: </strong>An extensive search of multiple databases was conducted, targeting trials and cohort studies dating from 2005 to present, providing a definition for NVO and its synonyms.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Analysis of the diagnostic criteria that composed the definitions and the breaking up of the definitions in the possible combinations of diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pursued a thematic synthesis of the published definitions with Boolean logic, yielding single or multiple definitions per included study. Using 8 predefined diagnostic criteria, we standardized definitions, focusing on the minimum necessary combinations used. Definition components were visualized using Sankey diagrams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 8,460 references, leading to 171 studies reporting on 21,963 patients. Of these, 91.2% were retrospective, 7.6% prospective, and 1.2% RCTs. Most definitions originated from authors, with 29.2% referencing sources. We identified 92 unique combinations of diagnostic criteria across the literature. Thirteen main patterns emerged, with the most common being clinical features with imaging, followed by clinical features combined with imaging and microbiology, and lastly, imaging paired with microbiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the need for a collaborative effort to develop standardized diagnostic criteria. We advocate for a future Delphi consensus among experts to establish a unified diagnostic framework for NVO, emphasizing the core components of clinical features and MRI while incorporating microbiological and histopathological insights to improve both patient outcomes and research advancements.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"359-368"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.023
Qiang Jian, Shaw Qin, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Yinqian Wang, Cong Liang, Dean Chou, Xiuqing Qian, Tao Fan
Background context: In cases of basilar invagination-atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD) complicated by atlas occipitalization (AOZ), the approach to cranial end fixation has consistently sparked debate, generally falling into two categories: C1-C2 fixation and occipitocervical fixation. Several authors believe that C1-C2 fixation carries a lower risk of fixation failure than occipitocervical fixation.
Purpose: To study the biomechanical differences among 3 different cranial end fixation methods for BI-AAD with AOZ.
Study design: This was a finite element analysis.
Patient sample: A 35-year-old female patient diagnosed with congenital BI-AAD and AOZ.
Outcome measures: range of motion (ROM), peak von Mise stress (PVMS), cage micro-subsidence, cage micro-slippage.
Method: Four finite element models were constructed, including unstable group (BI-AAD with AOZ), C1 lateral mass screw group, occipital plate group, occipitocervical rod group. The flexion and extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) as well as axial rotation (AR) were simulated under a torque of 1.5 Nm. Parameters include C1-C2 ROM, PVMS on screw-rod construct, cage micro-subsidence, cage micro-slippage.
Results: The ROM of the C1 lateral mass screw group was smaller than that of the other fixation groups in LB and AR, but not FE. Compared with the occipitocervical rod group, the ROM in LB and AR of the occipital plate group was higher, but not in FE. The PVMS of C1 lateral mass screw group was significantly higher than that of the other groups. The ROM and PVMS of the occipitocervical rod group were in between the other 2 groups. Regarding the screws at the cranial end, the PVMS of the 4-screw occipitocervical rod group was significantly lower than that of the other groups. In general, the cage micro-motion follows the ascending order: C1 lateral mass group < occipitocervical rod group < occipital plate group.
Conclusions: In cases of BI-AAD with AOZ, the C1 lateral mass screw group provided the least ROM and cage micro-motion, but the screw-rod PVMS was the largest. The advantage of occipital plate fixation lies in the lowest screw-rod PVMS, but the ROM and cage micro-motion is the highest. Four-screw fixation at the cranial end of occipitocervical rod group helps to reduce the PVMS and may prevent screw failure at the cranial end.
{"title":"Biomechanical differences of three cephalic fixation methods for patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation in the setting of congenital atlas occipitalization: a finite element analysis.","authors":"Qiang Jian, Shaw Qin, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Yinqian Wang, Cong Liang, Dean Chou, Xiuqing Qian, Tao Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>In cases of basilar invagination-atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD) complicated by atlas occipitalization (AOZ), the approach to cranial end fixation has consistently sparked debate, generally falling into two categories: C1-C2 fixation and occipitocervical fixation. Several authors believe that C1-C2 fixation carries a lower risk of fixation failure than occipitocervical fixation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the biomechanical differences among 3 different cranial end fixation methods for BI-AAD with AOZ.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>A 35-year-old female patient diagnosed with congenital BI-AAD and AOZ.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>range of motion (ROM), peak von Mise stress (PVMS), cage micro-subsidence, cage micro-slippage.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four finite element models were constructed, including unstable group (BI-AAD with AOZ), C1 lateral mass screw group, occipital plate group, occipitocervical rod group. The flexion and extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) as well as axial rotation (AR) were simulated under a torque of 1.5 Nm. Parameters include C1-C2 ROM, PVMS on screw-rod construct, cage micro-subsidence, cage micro-slippage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROM of the C1 lateral mass screw group was smaller than that of the other fixation groups in LB and AR, but not FE. Compared with the occipitocervical rod group, the ROM in LB and AR of the occipital plate group was higher, but not in FE. The PVMS of C1 lateral mass screw group was significantly higher than that of the other groups. The ROM and PVMS of the occipitocervical rod group were in between the other 2 groups. Regarding the screws at the cranial end, the PVMS of the 4-screw occipitocervical rod group was significantly lower than that of the other groups. In general, the cage micro-motion follows the ascending order: C1 lateral mass group < occipitocervical rod group < occipital plate group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of BI-AAD with AOZ, the C1 lateral mass screw group provided the least ROM and cage micro-motion, but the screw-rod PVMS was the largest. The advantage of occipital plate fixation lies in the lowest screw-rod PVMS, but the ROM and cage micro-motion is the highest. Four-screw fixation at the cranial end of occipitocervical rod group helps to reduce the PVMS and may prevent screw failure at the cranial end.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"389-400"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.012
Yoontae Hong, Yeon-Koo Kang, Eun Bi Park, Min-Sung Kim, Yunhee Choi, Siyoung Lee, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun-Hoe Kim, Miso Kim, Jin Chul Paeng, Chi Heon Kim
Background context: Numerous prognostic models are utilized for surgical decision and prognostication in metastatic spine tumors. However, these models often fail to consider the whole-body tumor burden into account, which may be crucial for the prognosis of metastatic cancers. A potential surrogate marker for tumor burden, whole-body metabolic tumor burden (wMTB), can be calculated from total lesion glycolysis (TLG) obtained from 18F-Fludeoxyglucose positive emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) images.
Purpose: We aimed to improve prognostic power of current models by incorporating wMTB for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with spine metastases.
Design: Retrospective analysis using a review of electrical medical records and survival data.
Patient sample: In this study, we included 74 NSCLC patients with image proven spine metastases.
Outcome measures: Increase in Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) index after incorporation of wMTB into prognostic scores.
Methods: Enrolled patients' baseline data, cancer characteristics and survival status were retrospectively collected. Five widely used prognostic scores (Tomita, Katagiri, Tokuhashi, Global Spine Tumor Study Group [GSTSG], New England Spine Metastasis Score [NESMS]), and TLG indexes were calculated for all patients. The relationships among survival time, prognostic models and TLG values were analyzed. Improvement of prognostic power was validated by incorporating significant TLG index into significant current models.
Results: Among current prognostic models, Tomita (EGFR wild-type), Katagiri, GSTSG and Tokuhashi were significantly related to patient survival. Among TLG indexes, LogTLG3 was significantly related to survival. Incorporation of LogTLG3 into significant prognostic models resulted in positive IDI index until 3 years in all models.
Conclusions: This study showed that incorporation of wMTB improved prognostic power of current prognostic models of metastatic spine tumors.
{"title":"Incorporation of whole-body metabolic tumor burden into current prognostic models for nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with spine metastasis.","authors":"Yoontae Hong, Yeon-Koo Kang, Eun Bi Park, Min-Sung Kim, Yunhee Choi, Siyoung Lee, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun-Hoe Kim, Miso Kim, Jin Chul Paeng, Chi Heon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Numerous prognostic models are utilized for surgical decision and prognostication in metastatic spine tumors. However, these models often fail to consider the whole-body tumor burden into account, which may be crucial for the prognosis of metastatic cancers. A potential surrogate marker for tumor burden, whole-body metabolic tumor burden (wMTB), can be calculated from total lesion glycolysis (TLG) obtained from <sup>18</sup>F-Fludeoxyglucose positive emission tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET) images.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to improve prognostic power of current models by incorporating wMTB for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with spine metastases.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis using a review of electrical medical records and survival data.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>In this study, we included 74 NSCLC patients with image proven spine metastases.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Increase in Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) index after incorporation of wMTB into prognostic scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled patients' baseline data, cancer characteristics and survival status were retrospectively collected. Five widely used prognostic scores (Tomita, Katagiri, Tokuhashi, Global Spine Tumor Study Group [GSTSG], New England Spine Metastasis Score [NESMS]), and TLG indexes were calculated for all patients. The relationships among survival time, prognostic models and TLG values were analyzed. Improvement of prognostic power was validated by incorporating significant TLG index into significant current models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among current prognostic models, Tomita (EGFR wild-type), Katagiri, GSTSG and Tokuhashi were significantly related to patient survival. Among TLG indexes, LogTLG3 was significantly related to survival. Incorporation of LogTLG3 into significant prognostic models resulted in positive IDI index until 3 years in all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that incorporation of wMTB improved prognostic power of current prognostic models of metastatic spine tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"306-316"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.024
William Chu Kwan, Tamir Ailon, Nicolas Dea, Nathan Evaniew, Raja Rampersaud, W Bradley Jacobs, Jérome Paquet, Jefferson R Wilson, Hamilton Hall, Christopher S Bailey, Michael H Weber, Andrew Nataraj, David W Cadotte, Philippe Phan, Sean D Christie, Charles G Fisher, Supriya Singh, Neil Manson, Kenneth C Thomas, Jay Toor, Alex Soroceanu, Greg McIntosh, Raphaële Charest-Morin
Background context: Healthcare reimbursement is evolving towards a value-based model, entwined and emphasizing patient satisfaction. Factors associated with satisfaction after degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery have not been previously established.
Purpose: Our primary objective was to ascertain satisfaction rates and satisfaction predictors at 3 and 12 months following surgical treatment for DCM.
Design: This is a prospective cohort study within Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).
Patient sample: Patients in the study were surgically treated for DCM patients who completed 3-month and 12-month follow-ups within CSORN between 2015 and 2021.
Outcome measures: Data analyzed included patient demographic, surgical variables, patient-reported outcomes (NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS, ED-5Q, PHQ-8), MJOA and self-reported satisfaction on a Likert scale.
Methods: Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify significant factors associated with satisfaction, address multicollinearity and ensure predictive accuracy. This process was conducted separately for the 3-month and 12-month follow-ups.
Results: Six hundred and sixty-three patients were included, with an average age of 60, and an even distribution across MJOA scores (mild, moderate, severe). At 3-month and 12-month follow-up, satisfaction rates were 86% and 82%, respectively. At 12 months, logistic regression showed the odds of being satisfied varied by +24%, -3%, -10%, -14%, +3%, and +12% for each 1-point change between baseline and 12 months in MJOA, NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS. Satisfaction increased 11-fold for each 0.1-point increased in ED-5Q from baseline to 12 months. At baseline, for every 1-point increase in SF-12-MCS, the odds of being satisfied increased by 7%. At 3 months, all PROs (except for NRS-AP change and baseline SF-12-MCS) predicted satisfaction. All logistic regression analyses demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, with the highest 12-month AUC of 0.86 (95%CI=0.81-0.90). No patient demographic or surgical factors influenced satisfaction.
Conclusions: Improvement in Patient Reported Outcomes and MJOA are strongly associated with patient satisfaction after surgery for DCM. The only baseline PRO associated with 12-months satisfaction was SF-12-MCS. No modifiable patient baseline characteristic or surgical variables were associated with satisfaction.
{"title":"Satisfaction in surgically treated patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: an observational study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.","authors":"William Chu Kwan, Tamir Ailon, Nicolas Dea, Nathan Evaniew, Raja Rampersaud, W Bradley Jacobs, Jérome Paquet, Jefferson R Wilson, Hamilton Hall, Christopher S Bailey, Michael H Weber, Andrew Nataraj, David W Cadotte, Philippe Phan, Sean D Christie, Charles G Fisher, Supriya Singh, Neil Manson, Kenneth C Thomas, Jay Toor, Alex Soroceanu, Greg McIntosh, Raphaële Charest-Morin","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Healthcare reimbursement is evolving towards a value-based model, entwined and emphasizing patient satisfaction. Factors associated with satisfaction after degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery have not been previously established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our primary objective was to ascertain satisfaction rates and satisfaction predictors at 3 and 12 months following surgical treatment for DCM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study within Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients in the study were surgically treated for DCM patients who completed 3-month and 12-month follow-ups within CSORN between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Data analyzed included patient demographic, surgical variables, patient-reported outcomes (NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS, ED-5Q, PHQ-8), MJOA and self-reported satisfaction on a Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify significant factors associated with satisfaction, address multicollinearity and ensure predictive accuracy. This process was conducted separately for the 3-month and 12-month follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and sixty-three patients were included, with an average age of 60, and an even distribution across MJOA scores (mild, moderate, severe). At 3-month and 12-month follow-up, satisfaction rates were 86% and 82%, respectively. At 12 months, logistic regression showed the odds of being satisfied varied by +24%, -3%, -10%, -14%, +3%, and +12% for each 1-point change between baseline and 12 months in MJOA, NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS. Satisfaction increased 11-fold for each 0.1-point increased in ED-5Q from baseline to 12 months. At baseline, for every 1-point increase in SF-12-MCS, the odds of being satisfied increased by 7%. At 3 months, all PROs (except for NRS-AP change and baseline SF-12-MCS) predicted satisfaction. All logistic regression analyses demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, with the highest 12-month AUC of 0.86 (95%CI=0.81-0.90). No patient demographic or surgical factors influenced satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvement in Patient Reported Outcomes and MJOA are strongly associated with patient satisfaction after surgery for DCM. The only baseline PRO associated with 12-months satisfaction was SF-12-MCS. No modifiable patient baseline characteristic or surgical variables were associated with satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"265-275"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.034
Klaus Doktor, Henrik Wulff Christensen, Tue Secher Jensen, Mark Hancock, Werner Vach, Jan Hartvigsen
<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Recumbent MRI is the most widely used image modality in people with low back pain (LBP), however, it has been proposed that upright (standing) MRI has advantages over recumbent MRI because of its ability to assess the effects of being weight-bearing. It has been suggested that this produces systematic differences in MRI parameters and differences in the correlation between MRI parameters and pain or disability in patients thus, potentially adding clinically helpful information.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper aims to review and summarize the available empirical evidence for or against these two hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Systematic review of the literature (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017048318). Studies should be based on paired observations of MRI findings in the upright and recumbent positions. Studies needed a minimum of 15 participants.</p><p><strong>Patient/participant sample: </strong>People aged 18 or older with or without low back pain ± radiculopathy OUTCOME MEASURES: All continuous, ordinal, and dichotomous parameters based on MRI images. All measures of pain or disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies assessing MRI parameters both in upright and recumbent positions on the same individuals measured on continuous, ordinal, or dichotomous scales were included. For each parameter, the expected direction of the difference between recumbent and upright position was specified as an increase, no change, or decrease. Information on the observed distribution of individual differences was extracted from included studies and subjected to meta-analyses if sufficient data was available. Observed differences were then compared with the prespecified expectations. Studies were also screened for information on correlations between patients' pain and/or disability and MRI parameters or differences between patient subgroups defined by patients' pain and/or disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 studies were identified, including 5.082 participants with LBP (16 studies) and 166 participants without low back pain (5 studies). Twenty-five MRI parameters were measured on a continuous scale, ten parameters were assessed on an ordinal scale, and 15 parameters were reported as dichotomous data. The observed differences between recumbent and upright MRI were mostly consistent with the prespecified expectations. Correlations between patients' pain or disability level and MRI parameters were reported in only one study, and three studies reported comparisons of MRI parameters across subgroups of patients defined by pain or disability characteristics. Higher correlations or larger effect sizes when using the upright position were observed in most results reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For most MRI parameters, the direction of the observed difference between assessment in recumbent and upright positions aligned with the pre-specified expectation implied by the weig
{"title":"Upright versus recumbent lumbar spine MRI: Do findings differ systematically, and which correlates better with pain? A systematic review.","authors":"Klaus Doktor, Henrik Wulff Christensen, Tue Secher Jensen, Mark Hancock, Werner Vach, Jan Hartvigsen","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Recumbent MRI is the most widely used image modality in people with low back pain (LBP), however, it has been proposed that upright (standing) MRI has advantages over recumbent MRI because of its ability to assess the effects of being weight-bearing. It has been suggested that this produces systematic differences in MRI parameters and differences in the correlation between MRI parameters and pain or disability in patients thus, potentially adding clinically helpful information.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper aims to review and summarize the available empirical evidence for or against these two hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Systematic review of the literature (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017048318). Studies should be based on paired observations of MRI findings in the upright and recumbent positions. Studies needed a minimum of 15 participants.</p><p><strong>Patient/participant sample: </strong>People aged 18 or older with or without low back pain ± radiculopathy OUTCOME MEASURES: All continuous, ordinal, and dichotomous parameters based on MRI images. All measures of pain or disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies assessing MRI parameters both in upright and recumbent positions on the same individuals measured on continuous, ordinal, or dichotomous scales were included. For each parameter, the expected direction of the difference between recumbent and upright position was specified as an increase, no change, or decrease. Information on the observed distribution of individual differences was extracted from included studies and subjected to meta-analyses if sufficient data was available. Observed differences were then compared with the prespecified expectations. Studies were also screened for information on correlations between patients' pain and/or disability and MRI parameters or differences between patient subgroups defined by patients' pain and/or disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 studies were identified, including 5.082 participants with LBP (16 studies) and 166 participants without low back pain (5 studies). Twenty-five MRI parameters were measured on a continuous scale, ten parameters were assessed on an ordinal scale, and 15 parameters were reported as dichotomous data. The observed differences between recumbent and upright MRI were mostly consistent with the prespecified expectations. Correlations between patients' pain or disability level and MRI parameters were reported in only one study, and three studies reported comparisons of MRI parameters across subgroups of patients defined by pain or disability characteristics. Higher correlations or larger effect sizes when using the upright position were observed in most results reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For most MRI parameters, the direction of the observed difference between assessment in recumbent and upright positions aligned with the pre-specified expectation implied by the weig","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}