Sante Publique最新文献

At the last congress of the Association Dentaire Française (ADF) (French Dental Association), the minister of health and prevention, François Braun, stressed the importance he attached to oral health prevention. He also emphasized his desire to roll out and extend prevention campaigns, targeting young people in particular. With this in mind, we are working to lay the political foundations for the mass, free distribution of single-use toothbrushes with fluoride toothpaste in schools. This oral health promotion campaign would aim to debunk any myths or misinformation spread by manufacturers and to encourage a profound cultural change in the way children and their parents learn about oral hygiene. The "cavity-score," which is still under development, could help to reinforce the idea, both among the general public and among healthcare professionals, that oral health is not isolated from the rest of the body, and that this health issue cannot be dealt with in isolation, but in conjunction with all healthcare professionals.

Introduction: Health literacy is a major public health issue. It directly influences the health-related decisions that individuals make. Improved health literacy is also directly correlated with better health. On the basis of this correlation, health literacy has ostensibly taken on the function of improving and maintaining good health. However, there is no evidence that health literacy, and hence the decisions it generates, are aimed at improving health.

Purpose of the research: The aim of our study is to describe, using data collected via the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), the framework underpinning the health literacy in those surveyed. This allows us to verify whether or not this framework is aligned with the objective of promoting or maintaining health.

Results: Health literacy is not governed by the objective of improving health.

Conclusions: Health literacy is not necessarily cultivated in a bid to improve personal health. Health-related decision-making (as a product of health literacy) is governed, at least in part, by other forces than that of the desire to improve health. We need to move beyond the model that reduces health literacy, and therefore health decision-making, to a purely rational and individual process aimed exclusively at promoting or maintaining personal health.

Introduction: The Specialized Diploma in Oral Surgery (Diplôme d’études spécialisées en chirurgie orale) was established in 2011. It gives its holders a unique combination of medical and surgical expertise. As a specialty, oral surgery can be pursued via both medical and dental pathways. However, the criteria guiding students’ choice of first job after residency remain largely unknown.

Purpose of the research: The primary objective was to evaluate the factors influencing students’ choice of first job after completing their oral surgery residency.

Results: The main geographical factors influencing job choice were the presence of family or friends, a short commute, and the location of the spouse’s place of work. Key practice conditions included access to advanced technical facilities and an operating theater offering general anesthesia. Clinical activities ranged from pre-implant grafts to general oral surgery. The likelihood of pursuing a hospital-based position in the same facility was correlated with the well-being experienced during the residency (p < 0.05) and with the oral surgeons’ medical background (p = 0.001). Significant associations exist between region of origin, internship location, and practice region (p < 0.001; p <0.001).

Conclusions: The main factors influencing the choice of first position after oral surgery residency depend on family-related and technical criteria.

Introduction: In this article, we offer an overview of the Capdroits participatory research approach, initially focusing on the controversy surrounding Article 12 of the International Convention of Persons with Disabilities, “Recognition of legal personality under conditions of equality.” Its objective is to encourage the participation of the people concerned by Article 12. It brings together academic researchers, experts in support relationships, and people directly concerned by impediment situations.

Purpose of the study: In this contribution, we present our participatory research approach, the methodology of “public problem-solving” and the ways in which it was deployed. We will show how productions and evaluations have been made accessible, while identifying the tensions at work.

Results: Two phases of research have been developed and deployed since 2015, based on an experimental “public problem-solving” methodology. Several collaborative productions have been developed, intended for various types of reception and made possible thanks to accessibility practices. They nevertheless highlight the tensions produced in the participatory processes.

Conclusions: The epistemology that we have been collectively developing since 2015 radically aims to reduce social and cognitive inequalities by promoting experiential knowledge while perpetuating inequalities. Our ability to dialogue [14] is the basis for co-constructing a radical epistemology, which, while imperfect, is profoundly purposeful.

Santé publique France has been developing participatory approaches in the field of local environmental health investigations for around twenty years. An initial assessment of this activity was carried out in 2016. Comparing four types of participatory process implemented on different polluted sites, this work aims to reflect on the contributions and limits of such approaches. Local stakeholders’ involvement has allowed those involved to voice their health concerns and their expectations about the studies to be conducted, as well as for points of disagreement or misunderstanding, and questions about the results obtained to be expressed. In some cases, it has led to improving the quality of the scientific results produced, by integrating local knowledge and taking into account the needs expressed. It has also sometimes increased the acceptability of environmental pollution management options. The outcome of the process depends on a combination of multiple factors in which the subjectivity of those involved and the type of solicitation play a major role. The agency has since set up new modes of participation based on co-construction processes initiated ahead of investigations. Citizen workshops have been set up to design and promote, with committed and non-committed stakeholders, the health perception study that will be carried out around the Lacq industrial basin. Santé publique France is also developing various methods aimed in particular at evaluating its participatory processes.

In 2015, in partnership with a research team, the PROFAN program was initiated by a group of peers to counter the increasing number of overdose-related deaths in Montreal. As of 2018, they have offered, in collaboration with the Association des intervenants en dépendance du Québec (AIDQ) (Quebec Association of Addiction Workers), over 160 training sessions, and have connected with 500 Québec organizations, resulting in a total of over 2,000 participants. A participative evaluation process was undertaken with respect to the expansion of the program. The level of engagement of both partners was evaluated for each stage of the research process, as well as the benefits reported by each party. Examining the level of engagement during the evaluation process highlighted the leadership exhibited by the PROFAN team regarding funding and the dissemination of results. The research team provided leadership for the production of the protocol and analysis, and helped with dissemination among researchers and specialists in the domain. Data collection involved a collaboration between both parties. As for reported benefits, some were associated with the program’s operations (increased credibility, support for it being updated, establishing partnerships), and others involved peer empowerment (skills development). The need to urgently intervene to decrease the number of overdose deaths seems to have facilitated the funding of the program and the development of partnerships. The partnership between PROFAN and the research team has been marked by collaboration and a sharing of expertise.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 health crisis, the official mechanisms of democracy in health, partnership, and participation were undermined. However, mechanisms that were less visible at the institutional level developed, driven by actors in the field.

Purpose of the research: This article aims to better understand the impacts of the epidemic on partnerships in health and in situations of disability during the period 2020–2021 Results: The participants’ responses (study 1) and narrative (study 2) were analyzed using the lexical analysis software Iramuteq. The results show that while the pandemic revealed difficulties in terms of cooperation between the health and medico-social fields, it also brought to light new operations between the actors and initiatives fostering creativity.

Conclusions: These results support the idea of a paradigm shift involving the recognition of the plurality of knowledge at work in the relationship between users, professionals, and decision makers.

Introduction: Patient engagement in the training of future health professionals is on the rise, given that the information patients transmit is immensely valuable to students. In addition, their involvement, alongside health professionals, in the formulation of academic materials should improve the quality of care in the long run. Little is written about good practice in involving patients in teaching, and even less about co-teaching, which is a demanding activity. We conducted a study with pairs of teachers who co-taught in health partnership workshops to develop best practice recommendations to optimize the roll-out of patient-healthcare professional co-teaching.

Purpose of the research: This qualitative study aims to present these recommendations of good practices of co-teaching.

Results: The data collected made it possible to develop, evaluate, and adjust six good practices to guide the pairs during the co-teaching process: knowledge of the subject taught, regular meetings, teaching framework and materials, role definition, symmetry and complementarity in the pair, and a debriefing session following each teaching session.

Conclusion: Patient involvement in co-teaching requires rigorous preparation. The application of good practice recommendations facilitates this preparation process.

Introduction: This study aims to test a measure of loneliness and to document its determinants among rural men and women in Senegal.

Methods: Data from the Niakhar Social Networks and Health Project were used. The analysis sample was composed of 1261 residents aged 16 years and older. Analyses were stratified by gender. Associations between loneliness and its determinants (socio-demographic characteristics and level of social integration) were examined with multivariate logistic regressions.

Results: Loneliness affects almost one in three people. Its prevalence is more significant for women. Multivariate analyses indicate that for both men and women, older age intensifies loneliness and recent migration experience protects against loneliness. Other factors act differently according to gender. Widowhood or divorce for men, and residential isolation for women, worsen the experience of loneliness. Social integration protects men against loneliness, but this relationship is not found for women. Finally, the effect of the level of social integration on loneliness varies with age.

Conclusions: This study, which documents a phenomenon which is often neglected by misconceptions about social solidarities in these societies, suggests that loneliness is not linked to the same issues for men and women. For men, being socially integrated and being in a union are protective, whereas for women, poor social integration does not appear to be a clear source of loneliness, unlike residential isolation.

Introduction: The accessibility of Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) is essential to reduce social inequalities and to meet the challenges posed by the increase in chronic diseases. In France, the distribution of TPE throughout the territory is heterogeneous and patients still lack sufficient access. With these perspectives in mind, a municipal health center has developed an innovative TPE device by involving concerned patients from the outset.

Objectives: The objectives of this article are to present the methodology implemented to co-construct a TPE program for patients with one or more prevalent diseases in the territory, as well as the results of the co-construction.

Methods: Creation of a project team with various actors: patients, health professionals, administrators, researchers. Organization of synchronous and asynchronous times.

Results: Four meetings and numerous exchanges made it possible to: define the common values and operating rules of the project team, reflect on the coordination of the care pathway, identify the specific and shared needs of patients affected by type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension and/or obesity, agree on the principles of the device.

Conclusion: The advantages of this device were discussed: flexible organization with numerous links with local actors, development of partnerships, expansion of the population concerned. Questions and difficulties were encountered, such as the coordination of actors and the representation of partner patients for the targeted diseases. This device will be tested and evaluated, mainly with an objective of improving it.