Public Health Genomics最新文献

Introduction: Family history is an established risk factor for both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes; however, no study has presented population-based prevalence estimates of family histories of CVD and diabetes and examined their joint impact on prevalence of diabetes, CVD, cardiometabolic risk factors, and mortality risk.

Methods: We analyzed data from a representative sample of the US adult population including 29,440 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2018) and assessed self-reported first-degree family history of diabetes and CVD (premature heart disease before age of 50 years) as well as meeting criteria and/or having risk factors for CVD and diabetes.

Results: Participants with joint family history exhibit 6.5 greater odds for having both diseases and are diagnosed with diabetes 6.6 years earlier than participants without family history. Healthy participants without prevalent CVD or diabetes but with joint family history exhibit a greater prevalence of diabetes risk factors compared to no family history counterparts. Joint family history is associated with an increase in all-cause mortality, but with no interactive effect.

Conclusion: Over 44% of the US adult population has a family history of CVD and/or diabetes that is comparable in risk to common cardiometabolic risk factors. This wide presence of high-risk family history and its simplicity of ascertainment suggests that clinical and public health efforts should collect and act on joint family history of CVD and diabetes to improve population efforts in the prevention and early detection of these common chronic diseases.

Introduction: This cluster-randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the effect of the "Which test is best?" tool on risk-appropriate screening (RAS) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake.

Methods: General practices in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia, and a random sub-sample of 460 patients (aged 25-74 years) per practice were invited by post. Clusters were computer randomized independently of the researchers to an online CRC risk calculator with risk-based recommendations versus usual care. Primary and secondary outcomes were RAS and screening uptake via self-reported 5-year screening behaviour after 12 months follow-up. The usual care group (UCG) also self-reported 5-year CRC screening behaviour at 12 month post-randomization.

Results: Fifty-six practices were randomized (27 to the intervention and 29 to the control, 55 practices participated) with 818 intervention and 677 controls completing the primary outcome measure. The intervention significantly increased RAS in high-risk participants compared with UCG (80.0% vs. 64.0%, respectively; OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.25-7.96) but not in average-risk (44.9% vs. 49.5%, respectively; OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.99-1.12) or moderate-risk individuals (67.9% vs. 81.1%, respectively; OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.12-1.33). Faecal occult blood testing uptake over 12 months was increased compared with the UCG (24.9% vs. 15.1%; adjusted OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.24-2.22), and there was a non-significant increase in colonoscopies during the same period (16.6% vs. 12.2%; adjusted OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.97-2.08).

Conclusion: An online CRC risk calculator with risk-based screening recommendations increased RAS in high-risk participants and improved screening uptake overall within a 12-month follow-up period. Such tools may be useful for facilitating the uptake of risk-based screening guidelines.

Introduction: The rapidly expanding direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) market is one area where narratives of underrepresented populations have not been explored extensively. This study describes African-American consumers' personal experiences with and perceptions about DTC GT and explores similarities and differences between African-Americans and an earlier cohort of mostly European American consumers.

Methods: Twenty semi-structured, qualitative interviews were held with individuals who self-identified as Black/African-American and completed DTC GT between February 2017 and February 2020. Interviews were transcribed and consensus-coded, using inductive content analysis.

Results: Participants generally had positive regard for DTC GT. When considering secondary uses of their results or samples, most participants were aware this was a possibility but had little concrete knowledge about company practices. When prompted about potential uses, participants were generally comfortable with research uses but had mixed outlooks on other nonresearch uses such as law enforcement, cloning, and product development. Most participants expressed that consent should be required for any secondary use, with the option to opt out. The most common suggestion for companies was to improve transparency. Compared to European American participants, African-American participants expressed more trust in DTC GT companies compared to healthcare providers, more concerns about law enforcement uses of data, and a stronger expression of community considerations.

Discussion/conclusion: This study found that African-American consumers of DTC GT had a positive outlook about genetic testing and were open to research and some nonresearch uses, provided that they were able to give informed consent. Participants in this study had little knowledge of company practices regarding secondary uses. Compared to an earlier cohort of European American participants, African-American participants expressed more concerns about medical and law enforcement communities' use of data and more reference to community engagement.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the parental views, attitudes, and preferences of expanded newborn screening (NBS) through genomic sequencing.

Study design: We conducted a semi-structured interview study with English and Spanish speaking mothers who had given birth within the USA in the past 5 years. The interviews explored opinions of expanding NBS, ethical and privacy concerns, and educational and social needs.

Results: All participants were interested in some degree of NBS expansion. However, there were differing opinions about the characteristics of conditions that should be included with less consensus for conditions with low penetrance, those without approved treatment, or onset outside of early childhood. All parents endorsed potential medical utility but also nonmedical utility as a motivating factor including being able to prepare and not being surprised by health issues as they occurred. Most felt that it was important to have some choice about the conditions screened, and many expressed the importance of proper education to make an informed choice and a desire to receive this education in the prenatal period. Responses to the type of education and information needed to make an informed decision varied.

Conclusions: Parents anticipate value in expanded NBS through genomic sequencing both for medical and nonmedical/personal utility. In order to successfully implement expanded NBS, prospective parents need more and earlier education about the process. These needs may differ by language and culture. Information needs to be easily accessible and to be curated by appropriate experts and stakeholders, including parents representative of the diversity of the USA.

Introduction: The tumor necrosis factor alpha inducible protein 3 (TNFAIP3) gene produces ubiquitin-editing protein A20, which inhibits nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation in a variety of signaling pathways. We examined the association between TNFAIP3 polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) susceptibility.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for available articles on TNFAIP3 polymorphisms in RA patients from inception until July 11, 2022. We included case-control studies on the association between rs2230926 and rs5029937 polymorphisms of TNFAIP3 and RA, and we excluded studies that contained overlapping data. We scored the quality of each study included based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses evaluated the association between TNFAIP3 polymorphisms and RA susceptibility in diverse ethnic populations and was verified through trial sequential analysis (TSA). This meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO register (number: CRD42022345160). There was no funding source.

Results: Seventeen studies were chosen for meta-analysis. Ten studies for rs2230926, and seven for rs5029937. An association was noted between TNFAIP3 rs2230926 G allele and RA in all subjects (odds ratio [OR] = 1.389; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.161-1.662; p < 0.001). Ethnicity-specific analysis showed significant association of rs2230926 G allele with RA in Europeans and Asians (OR = 1.642; 95% CI = 1.099-2.452; p = 0.015; OR = 1.404; 95% CI = 1.262-1.562; p < 0.001). An association was also noted between TNFAIP3 rs5029937 T allele and RA in all subjects (OR = 1.389; 95% CI = 1.207-1.785; p < 0.001). An ethnicity-specific meta-analysis revealed a significant association of the rs5029937 T allele with RA in Europeans and Asians. Dominant model analysis showed the same pattern for TNFAIP3 rs2230926 G and rs5029937 T alleles in Europeans and Asians, suggesting an association between rs2230926 G and rs5029937. TSA indicated a robust association between the TNFAIP3 polymorphisms and the risk of RA.

Conclusion: TNFAIP3 rs2230926 and rs5029937 polymorphisms are associated with RA susceptibility in European and Asian populations. However, the data were not stratified by parameters such as rheumatoid factor status, disease activity, or environmental variables.

Introduction: Precision medicine research investigates the differences in individuals' genetics, environment, and lifestyle to tailor health prevention and treatment options as part of an emerging model of health care delivery. Advancing precision medicine research will require effective communication across a wide range of scientific and health care disciplines and with research participants who represent diverse segments of the population.

Methods: A multidisciplinary group convened over the course of a year and developed precision medicine research case examples to facilitate precision medicine research discussions with communities.

Results: A shared definition of precision medicine research as well as six case examples of precision medicine research involving genetic risk, pharmacogenetics, epigenetics, the microbiome, mobile health, and electronic health records were developed.

Discussion/conclusion: The precision medicine research definition and case examples can be used as planning tools to establish a shared understanding of the scope of precision medicine research across multidisciplinary teams and with the diverse communities in which precision medicine research will take place. This shared understanding is vital for successful and equitable progress in precision medicine.

Introduction: Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) individuals face a 1 in 40 (2.5%) risk of having a BRCA mutation, which is 10 times the general population risk. JScreen launched the PEACH BRCA Study, a telehealth-based platform for BRCA education and testing, with the goal of creating an effective model for BRCA testing in low-risk AJ individuals who do not meet national testing criteria. Other goals were to determine the rate of BRCA mutations in this group, to assess the adequacy of screening for the 3 common AJ founder mutations only, and to assess satisfaction with the telehealth model to help inform a national launch of a broader cancer genetic testing program.

Methods: Criteria for participation included those who were AJ, resided in the metro-Atlanta area, were aged 25 and older, and had no personal or close family history of BRCA-related cancers. Pre-test education was provided through a video and written summary, followed by complimentary BRCA1/2 sequencing and post-test genetic counseling. Participants responded to pre- and post-test surveys, which assessed knowledge and satisfaction. Those who were not eligible to participate were sent genetic counseling resources and later surveyed.

Results: Five hundred one participants were tested and the results included 4 positives (0.8% positivity rate), 494 negatives, and 3 variants of uncertain significance. Overall satisfaction with the study process was high (96.9/100), knowledge about BRCA was high (97.5% of participants passed a pre-test knowledge quiz), and satisfaction with pre- and post-test education was high (97.9% of participants were satisfied with the pre-test video and written summary, and 99.5% felt that their post-test genetic counseling session was valuable). Many participants expressed interest in receiving broader cancer testing.

Conclusions: The BRCA founder mutation rate in a low-risk AJ population was significantly lower than the previously established AJ rate of 1 in 40. It was also determined that a telehealth model for a cancer genetics program is effective and acceptable to the population tested. This study established interest in broader cancer genetic testing through a telehealth platform and suggested that testing may be successful in the Jewish community at a national level and potentially in other populations, provided that patient education and genetic counseling are adequately incorporated.

Background: Lung cancer is one of the deadliest cancers, early diagnosis of which can efficiently enhance patient's survival. We aimed to screening out the serum miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for patients with lung cancer.

Methods: A total of 416 remarkably differentially expressed miRNAs were acquired using the limma package, and next feature ranking was derived by the minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance method. An incremental feature selection algorithm of a random forest (RF) classifier was utilized to choose the top 5 miRNA combination with the optimum predictive performance. The performance of the RF classifier of top 5 miRNAs was analyzed using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Afterward, the classification effect of the 5-miRNA combination was validated through principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis. Analysis of top 5 miRNA expressions between lung cancer patients and normal people was performed based on GSE137140 dataset, and their expression was validated by qPCR. The hierarchical clustering analysis was used to analyze the similarity of 5 miRNAs expression profiles. ROC analysis was undertaken on each miRNA.

Results: We acquired top 5 miRNAs finally, with the Matthews correlation coefficient value as 0.988 and the area under the curve (AUC) value as 0.996. The 5 feature miRNAs were capable of distinguishing most cancer patients and normal people. Furthermore, except for the lowly expressed miR-6875-5p in lung cancer tissue, the other 4 miRNAs all expressed highly in cancer patients. Performance analysis revealed that their AUC values were 0.92, 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.93, respectively.

Conclusion: By and large, the 5 feature miRNAs screened here were anticipated to be effective biomarkers for lung cancer.

Introduction: There is widespread under-identification of individuals at hereditary cancer risk despite national guidelines calling for screening. We evaluated the utilization of a tool embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) to assist primary care providers in screening patients for cancer genetic counseling referral.

Methods: We designed BestPractice Advisories linked to a Genetic Cancer Screening Tool (GCST) in EpicCare Ambulatory. The GCST identifies individuals for evaluation for BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome, and other risk mutations due to personal and family history. We tested the tool in a 7-week intervention in adult wellness visits at two clinics, one urban and one rural.

Results: Out of 687 eligible patients, the screening survey was completed for 469 (67%), and of these, 150 (32%) screened positive for a personal and/or family history meeting genetic counseling referral criteria. Of individuals screening positive, a referral order was placed for 20 (13%). GCST screen-positive rate varied by patient gender but not race or age. Referral rate varied by provider and clinic but was not significantly affected by patient demographics. In the previous year over an equivalent date range, 0.1% of wellness visits (1 of 1,086) led to a referral, and this rate increased to 2.1% (22 of 1,062) during the intervention. The proportion of providers referring patients also increased, from 3.8% (1 of 26) to 42.3% (11 of 26).

Discussion/conclusion: Genetic counseling referral of individuals at hereditary cancer risk was increased by use of an EHR-integrated tool. These findings add evidence for the benefit of clinical decision support for cancer genetic risk screening in primary care.

Background: Broad participation in genetic research is needed to promote equitable advances in disease treatment and prevention.

Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess motivations for, and concerns about, genetic research participation.

Methods: The Genetics in Research and Health Care Survey was sent in winter 2017-2018 to 57,331 adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) members from 7 US regions to assess attitudes about genetic testing in health care and research. The survey included an open-ended question on why members would or would not participate in genetic research. Open text responses to this question were coded in the qualitative analysis software Dedoose and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Code summaries were organized by major themes, subthemes, and exemplary quotes.

Results: Of the 10,369 participants who completed the survey, 2,645 (25%) provided a comment describing reasons they would or would not participate in research involving genetic testing. Respondents who provided a text comment were 64% female, 49% non-Hispanic (NH) White, 17% Asian/Pacific Islander, 20% Hispanic, and 14% NH Black. The primary themes identified were (1) altruism; (2) decision-making and planning; (3) data use; and (4) data security. These major themes were consistent across each race and ethnic group.

Conclusions: To promote broad participation in genetic research, it is important that recruitment materials address the primary motivators for genetic research participation, including altruism and the potential use of results for personal decision-making. Study materials should also address concerns about possible misuse of genetic information and fears over potential data breaches.