Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000373
David Boone
{"title":"Standards for prosthetics and orthotics.","authors":"David Boone","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000373","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-16DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000360
Emily Ridgewell, Leigh Clarke, Michael P Dillon, Julia Hibma, Jessica Landers, Sarah Anderson
{"title":"Informed patient choice: A national approach to collect, analyze, and report orthotic/prosthetic patient experience data in Australia.","authors":"Emily Ridgewell, Leigh Clarke, Michael P Dillon, Julia Hibma, Jessica Landers, Sarah Anderson","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000360","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141629172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-18DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000366
Yoo Jin Choo, Jang Hwan Kim, Min Cheol Chang
The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the effects of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed prostheses. Articles published up to August 19, 2023, were searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were "3D printed prosthesis," "3D printed prostheses," "3D printed prosthe*," "3D printed artificial arm," "3D printed artificial leg," "3D printing prosthesis," "3D printing prostheses," "3D printing prosthe*," "3D printing artificial arm," and "3D printing artificial leg." This review included studies that applied 3D-printed prostheses to upper- or lower-limb amputees. Case reports, conference abstracts, presentations, reviews, and unidentified articles were excluded from the analysis. A total of 937 articles were identified, 11 of which were included after confirming eligibility through the title, abstract, and full text. The results indicated that the 3D-printed prostheses demonstrated the ability to substitute for the functions of impaired limbs, similar to conventional prostheses. Notably, the production cost and weight were reduced compared with those of conventional prostheses, increasing patient satisfaction. The use of 3D-printed prostheses is expected to gain prominence in future clinical practice. However, concerns regarding the durability of 3D-printed prostheses have increased among users. Therefore, there is an ongoing need to explore highly durable materials that can withstand the weight of the user without breaking easily. In addition, advancements are required in technologies that enable the depiction of various skin tones and the production of smaller-sized prostheses suitable for clothing.
{"title":"Three-dimensional printing technology applied to the production of prosthesis: A systemic narrative review.","authors":"Yoo Jin Choo, Jang Hwan Kim, Min Cheol Chang","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000366","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the effects of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed prostheses. Articles published up to August 19, 2023, were searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were \"3D printed prosthesis,\" \"3D printed prostheses,\" \"3D printed prosthe*,\" \"3D printed artificial arm,\" \"3D printed artificial leg,\" \"3D printing prosthesis,\" \"3D printing prostheses,\" \"3D printing prosthe*,\" \"3D printing artificial arm,\" and \"3D printing artificial leg.\" This review included studies that applied 3D-printed prostheses to upper- or lower-limb amputees. Case reports, conference abstracts, presentations, reviews, and unidentified articles were excluded from the analysis. A total of 937 articles were identified, 11 of which were included after confirming eligibility through the title, abstract, and full text. The results indicated that the 3D-printed prostheses demonstrated the ability to substitute for the functions of impaired limbs, similar to conventional prostheses. Notably, the production cost and weight were reduced compared with those of conventional prostheses, increasing patient satisfaction. The use of 3D-printed prostheses is expected to gain prominence in future clinical practice. However, concerns regarding the durability of 3D-printed prostheses have increased among users. Therefore, there is an ongoing need to explore highly durable materials that can withstand the weight of the user without breaking easily. In addition, advancements are required in technologies that enable the depiction of various skin tones and the production of smaller-sized prostheses suitable for clothing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-18DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000367
Anna Berardi, Rachele Simeon, Maria Ricciardi, Marco Tofani, Barbara Lucia, Federica Aghilarre, Brigitte Gagnon, Silvia Giuliani, Giovanni Galeoto
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cultural adaptation and validation in Italian of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 (SPCMA 2.0).
Methods: The original scale was translated and culturally adapted from French to Italian using the "Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures-Principles of Good Practice" guidelines. Its internal consistency and test-retest reliability were examined. Its concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Italian version of the Wheelchair use Confidence Scale and Wheelchair Skills Test 4.2.
Results: Fifty-nine people were evaluated and re-evaluated after 48 h. Most of the items and subscale totals were stable in the 2 evaluations as they reported an intraclass correlation coefficient value of >0.77. The test-retest analysis of the dynamic evaluation was performed on the same patients 48 h apart. The analysis for construct validity showed statistically significant correlations with Wheelchair use Confidence Scale and Wheelchair Skills Test 4.2.
Conclusions: Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 is one of the few tools that allow researchers to perform a quantitative and standardized posture assessment in a cost-effective and time-saving way. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that it is an easy-to-administer scale and requires readily available tools. The limitations of this study highlighted above and the need to use quantitative and qualitative tools in clinical practice imply the need to conduct future studies.
{"title":"Cultural adaptation and validation in Italian of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0.","authors":"Anna Berardi, Rachele Simeon, Maria Ricciardi, Marco Tofani, Barbara Lucia, Federica Aghilarre, Brigitte Gagnon, Silvia Giuliani, Giovanni Galeoto","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the cultural adaptation and validation in Italian of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 (SPCMA 2.0).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original scale was translated and culturally adapted from French to Italian using the \"Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures-Principles of Good Practice\" guidelines. Its internal consistency and test-retest reliability were examined. Its concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Italian version of the Wheelchair use Confidence Scale and Wheelchair Skills Test 4.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine people were evaluated and re-evaluated after 48 h. Most of the items and subscale totals were stable in the 2 evaluations as they reported an intraclass correlation coefficient value of >0.77. The test-retest analysis of the dynamic evaluation was performed on the same patients 48 h apart. The analysis for construct validity showed statistically significant correlations with Wheelchair use Confidence Scale and Wheelchair Skills Test 4.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 is one of the few tools that allow researchers to perform a quantitative and standardized posture assessment in a cost-effective and time-saving way. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that it is an easy-to-administer scale and requires readily available tools. The limitations of this study highlighted above and the need to use quantitative and qualitative tools in clinical practice imply the need to conduct future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000364
Chang Liang Luo, Hui Dong Wu, Babak Hassan Beygi, Shan Liu, Yi Ying Zou, Lin Jing Shang, Man Sang Wong
Background: Stretching exercise is generally used for improving flexibility. However, its application to promote orthotic treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains unknown.
Objective: This study was to explore the effect of pre-orthosis stretching exercises on spinal flexibility and initial in-orthosis correction for the patients with AIS.
Study design: A pilot-controlled study.
Methods: An experimental group (EG) of 13 subjects (10 girls and 3 boys) with AIS allocating to self-stretching exercises and a control group (CG) of 19 AIS subjects (14 girls and 5 boys) with no stretching before orthosis fitting were recruited. The spinal flexibility of the EG was evaluated with an ultrasound imaging system and physical measurements. The initial in-orthosis correction rates between the 2 groups were compared with the independent t test, and the correlation analysis between the spinal flexibility measured from ultrasound images and physical measurement was performed with the Pearson correlation test.
Results: The initial Cobb angle of EG and CG were 25.70° ± 7.30° and 28.09° ± 5.58°, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the initial in-orthosis Cobb angle of EG (11.13° ± 6.80°) and CG (15.65° ± 9.10°) (p = 0.06). However, the spinal flexibility after stretching exercises was improved (p < 0.001), and the spinal flexibility changes measured with ultrasound and physical forward-bending method were significantly correlated (r = 0.57, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Stretching exercises before orthotic treatment could improve the spinal flexibility but did not cause a better in-orthosis correction. A study with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period should be conducted to investigate the long-term effect of stretching exercises.
{"title":"The effect of stretching exercises before orthotic treatment on the immediate in-orthosis correction of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A pilot study.","authors":"Chang Liang Luo, Hui Dong Wu, Babak Hassan Beygi, Shan Liu, Yi Ying Zou, Lin Jing Shang, Man Sang Wong","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching exercise is generally used for improving flexibility. However, its application to promote orthotic treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was to explore the effect of pre-orthosis stretching exercises on spinal flexibility and initial in-orthosis correction for the patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A pilot-controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental group (EG) of 13 subjects (10 girls and 3 boys) with AIS allocating to self-stretching exercises and a control group (CG) of 19 AIS subjects (14 girls and 5 boys) with no stretching before orthosis fitting were recruited. The spinal flexibility of the EG was evaluated with an ultrasound imaging system and physical measurements. The initial in-orthosis correction rates between the 2 groups were compared with the independent t test, and the correlation analysis between the spinal flexibility measured from ultrasound images and physical measurement was performed with the Pearson correlation test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial Cobb angle of EG and CG were 25.70° ± 7.30° and 28.09° ± 5.58°, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the initial in-orthosis Cobb angle of EG (11.13° ± 6.80°) and CG (15.65° ± 9.10°) (p = 0.06). However, the spinal flexibility after stretching exercises was improved (p < 0.001), and the spinal flexibility changes measured with ultrasound and physical forward-bending method were significantly correlated (r = 0.57, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stretching exercises before orthotic treatment could improve the spinal flexibility but did not cause a better in-orthosis correction. A study with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period should be conducted to investigate the long-term effect of stretching exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000365
Miriam Golding-Day, Joshua Young, Paul Charlton, Brian Houston, Shirley Thomas, Marion Walker
Background: The role of the orthotist in early gait rehabilitation after stroke in the United Kingdom is currently poorly understood.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to capture current opinion and practice of orthotists on their role in early stroke gait rehabilitation in the United Kingdom.
Methods: An anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to Health and Care Professions Council-registered orthotists by the mailing list of the British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists professional body in the United Kingdom. Survey items were multiple-choice, Likert scale, or open-ended questions to explore the experiences and opinions of orthotists in early poststroke gait rehabilitation.
Results: Responses were received from 56 participants. Orthotists reported having regular contact with patients who had a stroke within their usual clinical caseload. Multidisciplinary care was not typical with 46% respondents "rarely" seeing patients who had a stroke in joint assessment with another clinician. Confidence in managing lower limb gait difficulties was high, with 89% of orthotists feeling able to recommend a lower limb orthotic treatment. Ninety-eight percent (n = 55) of respondents agreed that orthotic assessment should be an essential element of gait re-education after stroke; however, orthotists reported limited involvement within early stroke rehabilitation.
Conclusion: UK orthotists surveyed in this study report that orthotic treatment is an important aspect of early gait rehabilitation after stroke. Respondents report barriers to multidisciplinary working, which may affect outcomes in this patient group.
{"title":"Orthotist involvement in early gait rehabilitation after stroke: A cross-sectional survey of orthotists in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Miriam Golding-Day, Joshua Young, Paul Charlton, Brian Houston, Shirley Thomas, Marion Walker","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000365","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of the orthotist in early gait rehabilitation after stroke in the United Kingdom is currently poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to capture current opinion and practice of orthotists on their role in early stroke gait rehabilitation in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to Health and Care Professions Council-registered orthotists by the mailing list of the British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists professional body in the United Kingdom. Survey items were multiple-choice, Likert scale, or open-ended questions to explore the experiences and opinions of orthotists in early poststroke gait rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 56 participants. Orthotists reported having regular contact with patients who had a stroke within their usual clinical caseload. Multidisciplinary care was not typical with 46% respondents \"rarely\" seeing patients who had a stroke in joint assessment with another clinician. Confidence in managing lower limb gait difficulties was high, with 89% of orthotists feeling able to recommend a lower limb orthotic treatment. Ninety-eight percent (n = 55) of respondents agreed that orthotic assessment should be an essential element of gait re-education after stroke; however, orthotists reported limited involvement within early stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UK orthotists surveyed in this study report that orthotic treatment is an important aspect of early gait rehabilitation after stroke. Respondents report barriers to multidisciplinary working, which may affect outcomes in this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616467/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The selection of the leading limb during gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations can significantly affect various biomechanical parameters. However, there is currently no established recommendation for the suitable leading limb in this population. The systematic review was aimed to propose a preferred leading limb for gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations based on biomechanical parameters. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Knowledge, were searched. The first selection criterion was based on abstracts and titles to address the research question. A total of seven studies were included in this review, and the Downs and Black's checklist was used by three researchers to assess the risk of bias. The review included a total of 61 adults with unilateral transtibial amputations, with a mean age range of 41 to 64.43 years. The confidence level of the included studies was poor, and the observational cohort was the most common study design (n = 5). Most of the studies were not replicable. Four of the included studies recommended the prosthetic limb as the preferred leading limb. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations may experience biomechanical benefits, including a more normal center of pressure path, reduced limb loading, and increased ankle energy generation, when leading with their prosthetic limb during gait initiation. However, further research is necessary to establish a more conclusive recommendation for the preferred leading limb in this population.
单侧经胫骨截肢者在步态开始时选择主导肢体会对各种生物力学参数产生重大影响。然而,目前还没有针对这一人群的合适主导肢体的既定建议。该系统性综述旨在根据生物力学参数,为单侧经胫骨截肢者的步态启动提出首选前肢。研究人员对谷歌学术、PubMed、Science Direct 和 ISI Web of Knowledge 等数据库进行了检索。第一个选择标准是根据摘要和标题来解决研究问题。共有七项研究被纳入本综述,三位研究人员使用了唐斯和布莱克的检查表来评估偏倚风险。该综述共纳入 61 名单侧经胫骨截肢的成人,平均年龄为 41 岁至 64.43 岁。纳入研究的可信度较低,观察性队列是最常见的研究设计(n = 5)。大多数研究无法重复。所纳入的研究中有四项建议将假肢作为首选的主导肢体。单侧经胫骨截肢者在步态起始阶段使用假肢前导可能会带来生物力学方面的益处,包括压力中心路径更正常、肢体负荷减轻以及踝关节能量生成增加。然而,要为这一人群首选的主导肢体确立更具决定性的建议,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Determining the optimal leading limb for gait initiation in unilateral transtibial amputees: A systematic review.","authors":"Nahid Tafti, Ensieh Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Javad Nouri","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The selection of the leading limb during gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations can significantly affect various biomechanical parameters. However, there is currently no established recommendation for the suitable leading limb in this population. The systematic review was aimed to propose a preferred leading limb for gait initiation in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations based on biomechanical parameters. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and ISI Web of Knowledge, were searched. The first selection criterion was based on abstracts and titles to address the research question. A total of seven studies were included in this review, and the Downs and Black's checklist was used by three researchers to assess the risk of bias. The review included a total of 61 adults with unilateral transtibial amputations, with a mean age range of 41 to 64.43 years. The confidence level of the included studies was poor, and the observational cohort was the most common study design (n = 5). Most of the studies were not replicable. Four of the included studies recommended the prosthetic limb as the preferred leading limb. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations may experience biomechanical benefits, including a more normal center of pressure path, reduced limb loading, and increased ankle energy generation, when leading with their prosthetic limb during gait initiation. However, further research is necessary to establish a more conclusive recommendation for the preferred leading limb in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-11-29DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000309
Mohammad S Malaheem, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Prosthetic alignment is a highly subjective process that is still based on clinical judgments. Thus, researchers have aimed their effort to quantify prosthetic alignment by providing an objective method that can assist and guide prosthetists in achieving transtibial (TT) prosthetic alignment. This systematic review aimed to examine the current literature on TT prosthetic alignment to scope the qualitative and quantitative methods designed to guide prosthetists throughout the TT prosthetic alignment process as well as evaluate the reported instruments and devices that are used to align TT prostheses and their clinical feasibility. A literature search, completed in June 2022, was performed using the following databases: Web of Science (Clarivate), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Pub Med (Medline) with searching terms focusing on TT, prosthesis, prosthetist, prosthetic alignment, and questionnaires, resulting in 2790 studies being screened. Twenty-four studies have used quantitative methodologies, where sensor technologies were found to be the most frequently proposed technology combined with gait analysis tools and/or subjective assessments. A qualitative method that assists prosthetists throughout the alignment process was not found. In this systematic review, we presented diverse methods for guiding and assisting clinical decision-making regarding TT prosthetic alignment. However, most of these methods considered varied parameters, and there is a need for elaboration toward standardized methods, which would improve the prosthetic alignment clinical outcome.
假体对齐是一个高度主观的过程,仍然基于临床判断。因此,研究人员的目标是通过提供一种客观的方法来量化假体对齐,该方法可以帮助和指导假体医师实现经胫骨(TT)假体对齐。本系统综述旨在检查目前关于TT假体对准的文献,以确定定性和定量方法的范围,这些方法旨在指导假体在整个TT假体对准过程中,并评估报道的用于对准TT假体的仪器和设备及其临床可行性。文献检索于2022年6月完成,使用以下数据库:Web of Science (Clarivate)、SCOPUS (Elsevier)和Pub Med (Medline),检索词集中在TT、义肢、义肢医师、义肢对齐和问卷调查,结果筛选了2790项研究。24项研究使用了定量方法,其中发现传感器技术是最常提出的与步态分析工具和/或主观评估相结合的技术。没有找到一种定性的方法来帮助义肢医生在整个校准过程中。在这篇系统综述中,我们提出了指导和协助TT假体对齐临床决策的多种方法。然而,这些方法大多考虑了不同的参数,需要制定标准化的方法,以改善义肢对准的临床效果。
{"title":"A systematic review of methods used to assist transtibial prosthetic alignment decision-making.","authors":"Mohammad S Malaheem, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Noor Azuan Abu Osman","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000309","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prosthetic alignment is a highly subjective process that is still based on clinical judgments. Thus, researchers have aimed their effort to quantify prosthetic alignment by providing an objective method that can assist and guide prosthetists in achieving transtibial (TT) prosthetic alignment. This systematic review aimed to examine the current literature on TT prosthetic alignment to scope the qualitative and quantitative methods designed to guide prosthetists throughout the TT prosthetic alignment process as well as evaluate the reported instruments and devices that are used to align TT prostheses and their clinical feasibility. A literature search, completed in June 2022, was performed using the following databases: Web of Science (Clarivate), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Pub Med (Medline) with searching terms focusing on TT, prosthesis, prosthetist, prosthetic alignment, and questionnaires, resulting in 2790 studies being screened. Twenty-four studies have used quantitative methodologies, where sensor technologies were found to be the most frequently proposed technology combined with gait analysis tools and/or subjective assessments. A qualitative method that assists prosthetists throughout the alignment process was not found. In this systematic review, we presented diverse methods for guiding and assisting clinical decision-making regarding TT prosthetic alignment. However, most of these methods considered varied parameters, and there is a need for elaboration toward standardized methods, which would improve the prosthetic alignment clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138452944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-07-27DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000260
Jason T Kahle, Rebecca M Miro, Loi T Ho, Alexis Gagliardotto, Ann E Swanson
Women living with limb loss (amputees) have unique needs that increase during pregnancy. Comfort, pain, and activity are exponentially compromised. Changes in mass and altered center of gravity increase the likelihood of falls and compromise safety for the mother and unborn baby. Subjective and physical functional performance measures data was collected through 2 separate pregnancies on a 36-year-old woman with a right transfemoral amputation. Physiological changes during pregnancy effected comfort, pain, and functional performance. Clinical practice guidelines for prosthetic management should be established to include protocols such as adjustment schedules, specialized socket design, and necessary component changes throughout the course of pregnancy.
{"title":"Effect of pregnancy on anthropometrics, comfort, and functional performance for women living with transfemoral limb loss: Case report.","authors":"Jason T Kahle, Rebecca M Miro, Loi T Ho, Alexis Gagliardotto, Ann E Swanson","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000260","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women living with limb loss (amputees) have unique needs that increase during pregnancy. Comfort, pain, and activity are exponentially compromised. Changes in mass and altered center of gravity increase the likelihood of falls and compromise safety for the mother and unborn baby. Subjective and physical functional performance measures data was collected through 2 separate pregnancies on a 36-year-old woman with a right transfemoral amputation. Physiological changes during pregnancy effected comfort, pain, and functional performance. Clinical practice guidelines for prosthetic management should be established to include protocols such as adjustment schedules, specialized socket design, and necessary component changes throughout the course of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000369
David Boone
{"title":"When best is not always best.","authors":"David Boone","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000369","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141075230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}