Journal of the ACM最新文献

Given a set of pairwise disjoint polygonal obstacles in the plane, finding an obstacle-avoiding Euclidean shortest path between two points is a classical problem in computational geometry and has been studied extensively. Previously, Hershberger and Suri (in SIAM Journal on Computing, 1999) gave an algorithm of O(n log n) time and O(n log n) space, where n is the total number of vertices of all obstacles. Recently, by modifying Hershberger and Suri’s algorithm, Wang (in SODA’21) reduced the space to O(n) while the runtime of the algorithm is still O(n log n). In this article, we present a new algorithm of O(n+h log h) time and O(n) space, provided that a triangulation of the free space is given, where h is the number of obstacles. The algorithm is better than the previous work when h is relatively small. Our algorithm builds a shortest path map for a source point s so that given any query point t, the shortest path length from s to t can be computed in O(log n) time and a shortest s-t path can be produced in additional time linear in the number of edges of the path.

Near-term quantum computers are likely to have small depths due to short coherence time and noisy gates. A natural approach to leverage these quantum computers is interleaving them with classical computers. Understanding the capabilities and limits of this hybrid approach is an essential topic in quantum computation. Most notably, the quantum Fourier transform can be implemented by a hybrid of logarithmic-depth quantum circuits and a classical polynomial-time algorithm. Therefore, it seems possible that quantum polylogarithmic depth is as powerful as quantum polynomial depth in the presence of classical computation. Indeed, Jozsa conjectured that “Any quantum polynomial-time algorithm can be implemented with only O(log n) quantum depth interspersed with polynomial-time classical computations.” This can be formalized as asserting the equivalence of BQP and “BQNC^BPP.” However, Aaronson conjectured that “there exists an oracle separation between BQP and BPP^BQNC.” BQNC^BPP and BPP^BQNC are two natural and seemingly incomparable ways of hybrid classical-quantum computation.

In this work, we manage to prove Aaronson’s conjecture and in the meantime prove that Jozsa’s conjecture, relative to an oracle, is false. In fact, we prove a stronger statement that for any depth parameter d, there exists an oracle that separates quantum depth d and 2d+1 in the presence of classical computation. Thus, our results show that relative to oracles, doubling the quantum circuit depth does make the hybrid model more powerful, and this cannot be traded by classical computation.

We establish the following two main results on order types of points in general position in the plane (realizable simple planar order types, realizable uniform acyclic oriented matroids of rank 3):

For the unlabeled case in (a), we prove that for any antipodal, finite subset of the two-dimensional sphere, the group of orientation preserving bijections is cyclic, dihedral, or one of A₄, S₄, or A₅ (and each case is possible). These are the finite subgroups of SO(3) and our proof follows the lines of their characterization by Felix Klein.

We study search problems that can be solved by performing Gradient Descent on a bounded convex polytopal domain and show that this class is equal to the intersection of two well-known classes: PPAD and PLS. As our main underlying technical contribution, we show that computing a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) point of a continuously differentiable function over the domain [0,1]² is PPAD ∩ PLS-complete. This is the first non-artificial problem to be shown complete for this class. Our results also imply that the class CLS (Continuous Local Search) – which was defined by Daskalakis and Papadimitriou as a more “natural” counterpart to PPAD ∩ PLS and contains many interesting problems – is itself equal to PPAD ∩ PLS.

Finite-domain constraint satisfaction problems are either solvable by Datalog or not even expressible in fixed-point logic with counting. The border between the two regimes can be described by a universal-algebraic minor condition. For infinite-domain constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), the situation is more complicated even if the template structure of the CSP is model-theoretically tame. We prove that there is no Maltsev condition that characterizes Datalog already for the CSPs of first-order reducts of (ℚ;<); such CSPs are called temporal CSPs and are of fundamental importance in infinite-domain constraint satisfaction. Our main result is a complete classification of temporal CSPs that can be expressed in one of the following logical formalisms: Datalog, fixed-point logic (with or without counting), or fixed-point logic with the mod-2 rank operator. The classification shows that many of the equivalent conditions in the finite fail to capture expressibility in Datalog or fixed-point logic already for temporal CSPs.