首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development最新文献

英文 中文
Interdisciplinary development of an ergonomic prone mobility cart. 一种符合人体工程学的移动小车的跨学科开发。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0279
Steven W Brose, Martin J Kilbane, Elizabeth Harpster, Steven J Mitchell, Chester Ho, Ken J Gustafson

Pressure ulcers remain a major source of morbidity and mortality in Veterans with neurologic impairment. Management of pressure ulcers typically involves pressure relief over skin regions containing wounds, but this can lead to loss of mobility and independence when the wounds are located in regions that receive pressure during sitting. An innovative, iterative design process was undertaken to improve prone cart design for persons with spinal cord injury and pressure ulceration. Further investigation of ways to improve prone carts is warranted to enhance the quality of life of persons with pressure ulcers.

压疮仍然是退伍军人神经损伤发病和死亡的主要原因。压疮的治疗通常包括对伤口皮肤区域进行减压,但当伤口位于坐着时承受压力的区域时,这可能导致活动能力和独立性的丧失。一个创新的,迭代的设计过程,以改善俯卧推车的设计,为脊髓损伤和压迫性溃疡的人。为了提高压疮患者的生活质量,有必要进一步研究改善俯卧推车的方法。
{"title":"Interdisciplinary development of an ergonomic prone mobility cart.","authors":"Steven W Brose,&nbsp;Martin J Kilbane,&nbsp;Elizabeth Harpster,&nbsp;Steven J Mitchell,&nbsp;Chester Ho,&nbsp;Ken J Gustafson","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pressure ulcers remain a major source of morbidity and mortality in Veterans with neurologic impairment. Management of pressure ulcers typically involves pressure relief over skin regions containing wounds, but this can lead to loss of mobility and independence when the wounds are located in regions that receive pressure during sitting. An innovative, iterative design process was undertaken to improve prone cart design for persons with spinal cord injury and pressure ulceration. Further investigation of ways to improve prone carts is warranted to enhance the quality of life of persons with pressure ulcers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 4","pages":"433-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0279","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34376007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of common wrist orthoses on the stiffness of wrist rotations. 普通腕部矫形器对腕部旋转刚度的影响。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0274
Daniel B Seegmiller, Dennis L Eggett, Steven K Charles

Wrist orthoses (also known as splints, braces, or supports) are commonly used to support or restrict the motion of a weak or injured wrist. These orthoses generally function by stiffening the wrist joint. Therefore, choosing the proper orthosis (or improving orthoses) requires that we understand their stiffness properties. In this study, we present a method for measuring the stiffness of wrist orthoses, and we apply this method to 12 of the most common wrist orthoses. We found similarities and differences between these orthoses, indicating that different orthoses have different effects on the wrist joint and, presumably, on wrist behavior. In particular, all six orthoses with a stay on the volar side or the volar and dorsal sides added a significant amount of stiffness to the wrist joint. In contrast, only one of three orthoses with a stay on the dorsal side and none of the three orthoses without stays exhibited a significant amount of stiffness, calling into question their ability to support the wrist joint. This work lays a foundation for future studies investigating the effect of wrist orthosis stiffness on wrist behavior and how wrist orthosis stiffness can be designed to produce behavior that facilitates healing.

手腕矫形器(也称为夹板、支架或支撑物)通常用于支持或限制虚弱或受伤手腕的运动。这些矫形器通常通过使手腕关节僵硬来起作用。因此,选择合适的矫形器(或改进矫形器)需要我们了解它们的刚度特性。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种测量腕部矫形器刚度的方法,并将该方法应用于12种最常见的腕部矫形器。我们发现了这些矫形器之间的异同,表明不同的矫形器对手腕关节有不同的影响,可能对手腕的行为也有不同的影响。特别是,所有六个固定在掌侧或掌侧和背侧的矫形器都增加了腕关节的刚度。相比之下,三种矫形器中只有一种在背部,而三种没有矫形器的矫形器都没有表现出明显的刚度,这让人质疑它们支撑手腕关节的能力。这项工作为未来研究腕部矫形器刚度对腕部行为的影响以及如何设计腕部矫形器刚度以产生促进愈合的行为奠定了基础。
{"title":"The effect of common wrist orthoses on the stiffness of wrist rotations.","authors":"Daniel B Seegmiller,&nbsp;Dennis L Eggett,&nbsp;Steven K Charles","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wrist orthoses (also known as splints, braces, or supports) are commonly used to support or restrict the motion of a weak or injured wrist. These orthoses generally function by stiffening the wrist joint. Therefore, choosing the proper orthosis (or improving orthoses) requires that we understand their stiffness properties. In this study, we present a method for measuring the stiffness of wrist orthoses, and we apply this method to 12 of the most common wrist orthoses. We found similarities and differences between these orthoses, indicating that different orthoses have different effects on the wrist joint and, presumably, on wrist behavior. In particular, all six orthoses with a stay on the volar side or the volar and dorsal sides added a significant amount of stiffness to the wrist joint. In contrast, only one of three orthoses with a stay on the dorsal side and none of the three orthoses without stays exhibited a significant amount of stiffness, calling into question their ability to support the wrist joint. This work lays a foundation for future studies investigating the effect of wrist orthosis stiffness on wrist behavior and how wrist orthosis stiffness can be designed to produce behavior that facilitates healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":"1151-1166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0274","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34864760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Accelerometer-based step initiation control for gait-assist neuroprostheses. 基于加速度计的步态辅助神经假体步启动控制。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0188
Kevin M Foglyano, John R Schnellenberger, Rudi Kobetic, Lisa Lombardo, Gilles Pinault, Stephen Selkirk, Nathaniel S Makowski, Ronald J Triolo

Electrical activation of paralyzed musculature can generate or augment joint movements required for walking after central nervous system trauma. Proper timing of stimulation relative to residual volitional control is critical to usefully affecting ambulation. This study evaluates three-dimensional accelerometers and customized algorithms to detect the intent to step from voluntary movements to trigger stimulation during walking in individuals with significantly different etiologies, mobility limitations, manual dexterities, and walking aids. Three individuals with poststroke hemiplegia or partial spinal cord injury exhibiting varying gait deficits were implanted with multichannel pulse generators to provide joint motions at the hip, knee, and ankle. An accelerometer integrated into the external control unit was used to detect heel strike or walker movement, and wireless accelerometers were used to detect crutch strike. Algorithms were developed for each sensor location to detect intent to step to progress through individualized stimulation patterns. Testing these algorithms produced detection accuracies of at least 90% on both level ground and uneven terrain. All participants use their accelerometer-triggered implanted gait systems in the community; the validation/system testing was completed in the hospital. The results demonstrated that safe, reliable, and convenient accelerometer-based step initiation can be achieved regardless of specific gait deficits, manual dexterities, and walking aids.

麻痹肌肉的电激活可以产生或增强中枢神经系统创伤后行走所需的关节运动。适当的刺激时机相对于残余的意志控制是有效影响活动的关键。本研究评估了三维加速度计和定制算法,用于检测具有明显不同病因、活动受限、手灵巧性和行走辅助设备的个体在行走过程中从自主运动到触发刺激的意图。三名中风后偏瘫或部分脊髓损伤患者表现出不同的步态缺陷,植入了多通道脉冲发生器,以提供髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的关节运动。集成在外部控制单元中的加速度计用于检测足跟撞击或助行器运动,无线加速度计用于检测拐杖撞击。为每个传感器位置开发了算法,通过个性化刺激模式检测步骤的意图。通过测试这些算法,在平地和不平坦地形上的检测精度都至少达到90%。所有参与者在社区中使用加速计触发的植入步态系统;验证/系统测试在医院完成。结果表明,安全、可靠和方便的基于加速度计的步启动可以实现,而不考虑特定的步态缺陷、手灵巧性和行走辅助。
{"title":"Accelerometer-based step initiation control for gait-assist neuroprostheses.","authors":"Kevin M Foglyano,&nbsp;John R Schnellenberger,&nbsp;Rudi Kobetic,&nbsp;Lisa Lombardo,&nbsp;Gilles Pinault,&nbsp;Stephen Selkirk,&nbsp;Nathaniel S Makowski,&nbsp;Ronald J Triolo","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrical activation of paralyzed musculature can generate or augment joint movements required for walking after central nervous system trauma. Proper timing of stimulation relative to residual volitional control is critical to usefully affecting ambulation. This study evaluates three-dimensional accelerometers and customized algorithms to detect the intent to step from voluntary movements to trigger stimulation during walking in individuals with significantly different etiologies, mobility limitations, manual dexterities, and walking aids. Three individuals with poststroke hemiplegia or partial spinal cord injury exhibiting varying gait deficits were implanted with multichannel pulse generators to provide joint motions at the hip, knee, and ankle. An accelerometer integrated into the external control unit was used to detect heel strike or walker movement, and wireless accelerometers were used to detect crutch strike. Algorithms were developed for each sensor location to detect intent to step to progress through individualized stimulation patterns. Testing these algorithms produced detection accuracies of at least 90% on both level ground and uneven terrain. All participants use their accelerometer-triggered implanted gait systems in the community; the validation/system testing was completed in the hospital. The results demonstrated that safe, reliable, and convenient accelerometer-based step initiation can be achieved regardless of specific gait deficits, manual dexterities, and walking aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":"919-932"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34971398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Development of the Modified Four Square Step Test and its reliability and validity in people with stroke. 改良四方步检验在脑卒中患者中的发展及其信效度。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.04.0112
Margaret A Roos, Darcy S Reisman, Gregory Hicks, William Rose, Katherine S Rudolph

Adults with stroke have difficulty avoiding obstacles when walking, especially when a time constraint is imposed. The Four Square Step Test (FSST) evaluates dynamic balance by requiring individuals to step over canes in multiple directions while being timed, but many people with stroke are unable to complete it. The purposes of this study were to (1) modify the FSST by replacing the canes with tape so that more persons with stroke could successfully complete the test and (2) examine the reliability and validity of the modified version. Fifty-five subjects completed the Modified FSST (mFSST) by stepping over tape in all four directions while being timed. The mFSST resulted in significantly greater numbers of subjects completing the test than the FSST (39/55 [71%] and 33/55 [60%], respectively) (p < 0.04). The test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability of the mFSST were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ranges: 0.81-0.99). Construct and concurrent validity of the mFSST were also established. The minimal detectable change was 6.73 s. The mFSST, an ideal measure of dynamic balance, can identify progress in people with stroke in varied settings and can be completed by a wide range of people with stroke in approximately 5 min with the use of minimal equipment (tape, stop watch).

成年中风患者在行走时难以避开障碍物,尤其是在有时间限制的情况下。四方步测试(FSST)通过要求个人在计时的同时从多个方向跨过手杖来评估动态平衡,但许多中风患者无法完成它。本研究的目的是:(1)修改FSST,用胶带代替手杖,使更多的中风患者能够成功完成测试;(2)检验修改版本的信度和效度。55名被试完成了改良FSST (mFSST),他们在计时的同时在四个方向上踩过胶带。mFSST导致完成测试的受试者人数显著高于FSST(分别为39/55[71%]和33/55 [60%])(p < 0.04)。mFSST的重测信度、组内信度和组间信度均极好(组内相关系数范围为0.81 ~ 0.99)。建立了mFSST的结构和并发效度。最小可检测变化为6.73 s。mFSST是一种理想的动态平衡测量方法,可以识别中风患者在不同环境下的进展情况,并且可以由广泛的中风患者在大约5分钟内完成,使用最少的设备(磁带,秒表)。
{"title":"Development of the Modified Four Square Step Test and its reliability and validity in people with stroke.","authors":"Margaret A Roos,&nbsp;Darcy S Reisman,&nbsp;Gregory Hicks,&nbsp;William Rose,&nbsp;Katherine S Rudolph","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.04.0112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.04.0112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adults with stroke have difficulty avoiding obstacles when walking, especially when a time constraint is imposed. The Four Square Step Test (FSST) evaluates dynamic balance by requiring individuals to step over canes in multiple directions while being timed, but many people with stroke are unable to complete it. The purposes of this study were to (1) modify the FSST by replacing the canes with tape so that more persons with stroke could successfully complete the test and (2) examine the reliability and validity of the modified version. Fifty-five subjects completed the Modified FSST (mFSST) by stepping over tape in all four directions while being timed. The mFSST resulted in significantly greater numbers of subjects completing the test than the FSST (39/55 [71%] and 33/55 [60%], respectively) (p < 0.04). The test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability of the mFSST were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ranges: 0.81-0.99). Construct and concurrent validity of the mFSST were also established. The minimal detectable change was 6.73 s. The mFSST, an ideal measure of dynamic balance, can identify progress in people with stroke in varied settings and can be completed by a wide range of people with stroke in approximately 5 min with the use of minimal equipment (tape, stop watch).</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 3","pages":"403-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.04.0112","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34554384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans with back pain: Characteristics and predictors of compensation and pension award. 伊拉克/阿富汗时期退伍军人背部疼痛:补偿和养老金奖励的特征和预测因素。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2015.08.0151
Carine J Sakr, Anne C Black, Martin D Slade, Justin Calfo, Marc I Rosen

Approximately 440,000 U.S. Veterans receive compensation for back and/or neck conditions. Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) criteria state that back compensation determinations are based on impaired back function and not comorbidity or lifestyle, but whether compensation is based solely on consideration of the lumbosacral region is unknown. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medical chart data from 178 post-9/11 Veterans applying for service connection for back pain in fiscal year 2012 at the Department of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System. Altogether, 62% were noted to have impairment of back functioning and 74% were awarded compensation. Rates of comorbidities (obesity, depression, smoking, and illicit drug use) were high. In multivariate models predicting compensation awarded, only having an impaired back was associated with service-connected compensation. Pain was associated with extent of service connection, but this relationship was fully mediated by functional back impairment. No other measure (including work status) significantly predicted compensation. In summary, service connection was largely based on functional impairment, as called for in VBA criteria. Although pain and comorbidities undoubtedly affect day-to-day functioning, these factors were not independently related to service connection. Veterans present with many remediable conditions, and the service-connection evaluation may be an opportunity to engage them in treatment.

大约44万美国退伍军人接受背部和/或颈部疾病的补偿。退伍军人福利管理局(VBA)的标准指出,背部补偿的确定是基于背部功能受损,而不是共病或生活方式,但补偿是否仅仅基于腰骶区是未知的。在这项研究中,我们对2012财政年度在康涅狄格州退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统申请背部疼痛服务连接的178名9/11后退伍军人的医疗图表数据进行了横断面分析。总的来说,62%的人背部功能受损,74%的人获得了赔偿。合并症(肥胖、抑郁、吸烟和非法药物使用)的发生率很高。在预测补偿的多变量模型中,只有背部受损与服务相关的补偿有关。疼痛与服务连接程度相关,但这种关系完全由功能性背部损伤介导。没有其他措施(包括工作状态)显著预测薪酬。总之,服务连接在很大程度上基于功能损伤,这是VBA标准所要求的。虽然疼痛和合并症无疑会影响日常功能,但这些因素与服务连接并不独立相关。退伍军人目前有许多可补救的条件,服务连接评估可能是一个机会,使他们参与治疗。
{"title":"Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans with back pain: Characteristics and predictors of compensation and pension award.","authors":"Carine J Sakr,&nbsp;Anne C Black,&nbsp;Martin D Slade,&nbsp;Justin Calfo,&nbsp;Marc I Rosen","doi":"10.1682/jrrd.2015.08.0151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2015.08.0151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 440,000 U.S. Veterans receive compensation for back and/or neck conditions. Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) criteria state that back compensation determinations are based on impaired back function and not comorbidity or lifestyle, but whether compensation is based solely on consideration of the lumbosacral region is unknown. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medical chart data from 178 post-9/11 Veterans applying for service connection for back pain in fiscal year 2012 at the Department of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System. Altogether, 62% were noted to have impairment of back functioning and 74% were awarded compensation. Rates of comorbidities (obesity, depression, smoking, and illicit drug use) were high. In multivariate models predicting compensation awarded, only having an impaired back was associated with service-connected compensation. Pain was associated with extent of service connection, but this relationship was fully mediated by functional back impairment. No other measure (including work status) significantly predicted compensation. In summary, service connection was largely based on functional impairment, as called for in VBA criteria. Although pain and comorbidities undoubtedly affect day-to-day functioning, these factors were not independently related to service connection. Veterans present with many remediable conditions, and the service-connection evaluation may be an opportunity to engage them in treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":"659-668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/jrrd.2015.08.0151","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39423624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Correlates of prescription opioid therapy in Veterans with chronic pain and history of substance use disorder. 慢性疼痛和物质使用障碍史退伍军人处方阿片类药物治疗的相关性
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0230
T. Lovejoy, S. Dobscha, D. Turk, M. Weimer, B. Morasco
Patients with a history of substance use disorder (SUD) are more likely to be prescribed opioid medications for chronic pain than patients without an SUD history; however, little is known about prescription opioid therapy in populations composed exclusively of patients with SUD. This study examined correlates of prescription opioid therapy in 214 Veterans with chronic noncancer pain and an SUD history. Participants completed psychosocial questionnaires and participated in a structured mental health diagnostic interview, and medical diagnoses and opioid pharmacy data were abstracted from their Department of Veterans Affairs electronic medical records. Participants were categorized into three groups based on opioid prescriptions in the past 90 d: no opioid therapy (n = 134), short-term (<90 d) opioid therapy (n = 31), or long-term (>/= 90 d) opioid therapy (n = 49). Relative to participants prescribed no or short-term opioid therapy, participants who were prescribed long-term opioid therapy had a greater number of pain diagnoses; reported higher levels of pain severity, interference, and catastrophizing; and endorsed lower chronic pain self-efficacy. In a multivariate model, number of pain diagnoses and pain interference were associated with a greater likelihood of being prescribed long-term opioid therapy after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. Findings highlight the poor pain-related functioning in patients with SUD histories who are prescribed long-term opioid therapy.
有物质使用障碍(SUD)史的患者比没有SUD史的患者更有可能处方阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛;然而,对于处方阿片类药物治疗在完全由SUD患者组成的人群中的应用知之甚少。本研究调查了214例有慢性非癌性疼痛和SUD病史的退伍军人处方阿片类药物治疗的相关性。参与者完成了心理社会问卷,并参加了结构化的心理健康诊断访谈,医疗诊断和阿片类药物药物数据从他们的退伍军人事务部电子病历中提取。参与者根据过去90天的阿片类药物处方分为三组:未阿片类药物治疗(n = 134),短期(/= 90 d)阿片类药物治疗(n = 49)。与未接受阿片类药物治疗或短期阿片类药物治疗的参与者相比,接受长期阿片类药物治疗的参与者有更多的疼痛诊断;报告的疼痛严重程度、干扰和灾难化程度较高;并证实了较低的慢性疼痛自我效能感。在一个多变量模型中,在控制了人口统计学和临床特征后,疼痛诊断和疼痛干扰的数量与更大的长期阿片类药物治疗的可能性相关。研究结果强调,长期服用阿片类药物治疗的有SUD病史的患者疼痛相关功能较差。
{"title":"Correlates of prescription opioid therapy in Veterans with chronic pain and history of substance use disorder.","authors":"T. Lovejoy, S. Dobscha, D. Turk, M. Weimer, B. Morasco","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0230","url":null,"abstract":"Patients with a history of substance use disorder (SUD) are more likely to be prescribed opioid medications for chronic pain than patients without an SUD history; however, little is known about prescription opioid therapy in populations composed exclusively of patients with SUD. This study examined correlates of prescription opioid therapy in 214 Veterans with chronic noncancer pain and an SUD history. Participants completed psychosocial questionnaires and participated in a structured mental health diagnostic interview, and medical diagnoses and opioid pharmacy data were abstracted from their Department of Veterans Affairs electronic medical records. Participants were categorized into three groups based on opioid prescriptions in the past 90 d: no opioid therapy (n = 134), short-term (<90 d) opioid therapy (n = 31), or long-term (>/= 90 d) opioid therapy (n = 49). Relative to participants prescribed no or short-term opioid therapy, participants who were prescribed long-term opioid therapy had a greater number of pain diagnoses; reported higher levels of pain severity, interference, and catastrophizing; and endorsed lower chronic pain self-efficacy. In a multivariate model, number of pain diagnoses and pain interference were associated with a greater likelihood of being prescribed long-term opioid therapy after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. Findings highlight the poor pain-related functioning in patients with SUD histories who are prescribed long-term opioid therapy.","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 1 1","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0230","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67551429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Randomized controlled trial of a brief Internet-based intervention for families of Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. 对创伤后应激障碍退伍军人家庭进行简短网络干预的随机对照试验。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0257
A. Interian, A. Kline, D. Perlick, L. Dixon, Ann Feder, M. Weiner, M. Goldstein, Kerry Hennessy, Lauren M St Hill, M. Losonczy
Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their families require resources to cope with postdeployment readjustment. Responding to this need, the current study examined a brief Internet-based intervention that provided Veterans' families with psychoeducation on postdeployment readjustment. Participants were 103 dyads of Veterans with probable PTSD and a designated family member/partner. Dyads were randomized to an intervention group, in which the family member completed the intervention, or to a control group with no intervention. Each member of the dyad completed surveys at baseline and 2 mo follow-up. Family member surveys focused on perceived empowerment, efficacy to provide support, and communication (perceived criticism and reactivity to criticism). Veteran surveys assessed perceived family support and communication. Results showed that Veterans in the intervention group reported decreases in reactivity to criticism but also decreased perceived family support. No significant differences were observed in outcomes reported by family members. This preliminary study provides an early understanding of this novel outreach program, as well as the challenges inherent with a very brief intervention. Future research can build on the current study by more closely evaluating the communication changes that occur with this form of intervention and whether greater intervention intensity is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01554839.
患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人及其家人需要资源来应对部署后的重新适应。针对这一需求,本研究考察了一个简短的基于互联网的干预,为退伍军人家庭提供了部署后重新适应的心理教育。参与者是103对可能患有PTSD的退伍军人和一名指定的家庭成员/伴侣。二人组被随机分为干预组,其中家庭成员完成干预,或对照组没有干预。二人组的每个成员都完成了基线和2个月随访时的调查。家庭成员调查的重点是感知授权、提供支持的有效性和沟通(感知批评和对批评的反应)。退伍军人调查评估了感知到的家庭支持和沟通。结果显示,干预组的退伍军人对批评的反应有所减少,但对家庭支持的感知也有所下降。家庭成员报告的结果无显著差异。这项初步研究提供了对这种新颖的外展计划的早期理解,以及非常简短的干预所固有的挑战。未来的研究可以建立在当前研究的基础上,更密切地评估这种形式的干预所发生的交流变化,以及是否需要更大的干预强度。临床试验注册临床试验标识符:NCT01554839。
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of a brief Internet-based intervention for families of Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.","authors":"A. Interian, A. Kline, D. Perlick, L. Dixon, Ann Feder, M. Weiner, M. Goldstein, Kerry Hennessy, Lauren M St Hill, M. Losonczy","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0257","url":null,"abstract":"Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their families require resources to cope with postdeployment readjustment. Responding to this need, the current study examined a brief Internet-based intervention that provided Veterans' families with psychoeducation on postdeployment readjustment. Participants were 103 dyads of Veterans with probable PTSD and a designated family member/partner. Dyads were randomized to an intervention group, in which the family member completed the intervention, or to a control group with no intervention. Each member of the dyad completed surveys at baseline and 2 mo follow-up. Family member surveys focused on perceived empowerment, efficacy to provide support, and communication (perceived criticism and reactivity to criticism). Veteran surveys assessed perceived family support and communication. Results showed that Veterans in the intervention group reported decreases in reactivity to criticism but also decreased perceived family support. No significant differences were observed in outcomes reported by family members. This preliminary study provides an early understanding of this novel outreach program, as well as the challenges inherent with a very brief intervention. Future research can build on the current study by more closely evaluating the communication changes that occur with this form of intervention and whether greater intervention intensity is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01554839.","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"11 1","pages":"629-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0257","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67551755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
VHA Pain Research Working Group and VHA Pain Care. VHA疼痛研究工作组和VHA疼痛护理。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.10.0195
R. Gallagher
This important special issue of the Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development (JRRD) documents the steady progress of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in promoting and supporting pain research. As described by Drs. Kerns and Heapy in their Editorial [1], the development of the VHA's pain research enterprise has evolved over many years, with a particular focus on understanding the factors, including combined treatments, that affect the course and outcome of pain care for Veterans and inform clinical policy. The articles herein provide a sample of the breadth and sophistication of the VHA pain research enterprise in several domains: observational studies that help us understand the biopsychosocial factors influencing the development and perpetuation of chronic pain and pain treatment outcomes in Veterans with chronic pain and its comorbidities, such as posttraumatic stress disorder; investigations of the effects of exercise on pain sensitivity; and studies of the efficacy of multimodal treatments, e.g., combining exercise with medications to improve physical capacity. An important nidus of the VHA's effort lies in the Pain Research Working Group (PRWG), led by Dr. Kerns, which has met by telephone monthly for many years and in face-to-face meetings in several venues. These meetings have served to enable dialog between officials from the VHA's Office of Research Development (ORD) with pain investigators, to introduce new investigators to the VHA pain research enterprise, and to foster collaborations among VHA investigators and research centers. Meetings of the PRWG in several retreats and, in recent years, at the yearly Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) meetings have enabled the interpersonal connectivity so critical to social networking in the development of a multicenter research enterprise. As an example, the VHA Center for Healthcare Equity Research and Promotion based at my VHA institution, the Philadelphia Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, supported a PRWG retreat chaired by Dr. Kerns in 2005, when I was new to the VHA, that led to my connection to VHA's Rehabilitation Research & Development Service (RR&D) and my subsequent research, education, and policy work with the Department of Defense and with several VHA investigators. The RR&D-sponsored pain state-of-the-art research conference in September 2007, focusing on Veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and chaired by Dr. Kerns, led to a special issue on VHA pain research in Pain Medicine in 2009, co-edited by Dr. Kerns and pain research leader Dr. Steve Dobscha from Oregon [2]. Dr. Kerns' extraordinary leadership in encouraging, sustaining, and expanding VHA pain research over these many years, which has been strongly supported by Dr. Kusiak and VHA ORD as well as VHA Central Office leadership, has been accompanied by a steady growth in the pain research enterprise throughout VHA. A recent highlight is the HSR&D-funded Center of Innovation
这期康复研究与发展杂志(JRRD)的重要特刊记录了退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)在促进和支持疼痛研究方面的稳步进展。正如dr。Kerns和Heapy在他们的社论b[1]中指出,VHA疼痛研究事业的发展已经发展了多年,特别关注了解影响退伍军人疼痛护理过程和结果的因素,包括联合治疗,并为临床政策提供信息。本文提供了VHA疼痛研究在几个领域的广度和复杂性的样本:观察性研究,帮助我们了解影响慢性疼痛及其合并症(如创伤后应激障碍)的退伍军人慢性疼痛的发展和持续以及疼痛治疗结果的生物心理社会因素;运动对疼痛敏感性影响的研究;以及对多模式治疗效果的研究,例如,将运动与药物结合起来以提高身体能力。VHA努力的一个重要焦点是由Kerns博士领导的疼痛研究工作组(PRWG),该工作组多年来每月举行一次电话会议,并在几个地点举行面对面会议。这些会议有助于VHA研究发展办公室(ORD)官员与疼痛研究人员之间的对话,向VHA疼痛研究企业介绍新的研究人员,并促进VHA研究人员和研究中心之间的合作。PRWG在几次务静会上的会议,以及近年来在年度卫生服务研究与发展(HSR&D)会议上的会议,使人际联系在多中心研究企业的发展中对社会网络至关重要。例如,我所在的退伍军人管理局费城退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心的退伍军人管理局医疗公平研究和促进中心,在2005年支持了由Kerns博士主持的PRWG务虚会,当时我刚加入退伍军人管理局,这使我与退伍军人管理局的康复研究与发展服务(RR&D)建立了联系,并在随后与国防部和几名退伍军人管理局调查员一起进行了研究、教育和政策工作。2007年9月,由Dr. Kerns主持的rr&d赞助的疼痛最新研究会议,重点关注伊拉克和阿富汗战争的退伍军人,导致了2009年疼痛医学的VHA疼痛研究特刊,由Dr. Kerns和来自俄勒冈州b[2]的疼痛研究负责人Steve Dobscha博士共同编辑。多年来,在Kusiak博士和VHA ORD以及VHA中央办公室领导的大力支持下,Kerns博士在鼓励、维持和扩大VHA疼痛研究方面的卓越领导作用,伴随着整个VHA疼痛研究事业的稳步增长。最近的一个亮点是由hsr&d资助的创新中心(COIN),该中心位于VA康涅狄格医疗保健系统,称为疼痛研究、信息学、多种疾病和教育(PRIME)中心。Kerns, Heapy等,它召集了来自VHA周围的研究专家,专注于疼痛研究,并补充了其他VHA中心,尽管不是专门致力于疼痛研究,但已经开发了重要的疼痛研究项目。特别值得注意的是初级保健层面的研究,该研究为阶梯式护理模型提供了支持[3-8]。在获得COIN奖之后,Kerns博士在国家VHA疼痛管理项目办公室的行政领导地位自然演变为他目前的职位,即我们办公室的疼痛研究特别顾问,这包括他参加我们每周的疼痛管理办公室会议和PRWG成员的频繁演讲。这种定期交流传达了VHA疼痛研究的几个关键好处。…
{"title":"VHA Pain Research Working Group and VHA Pain Care.","authors":"R. Gallagher","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.10.0195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.10.0195","url":null,"abstract":"This important special issue of the Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development (JRRD) documents the steady progress of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in promoting and supporting pain research. As described by Drs. Kerns and Heapy in their Editorial [1], the development of the VHA's pain research enterprise has evolved over many years, with a particular focus on understanding the factors, including combined treatments, that affect the course and outcome of pain care for Veterans and inform clinical policy. The articles herein provide a sample of the breadth and sophistication of the VHA pain research enterprise in several domains: observational studies that help us understand the biopsychosocial factors influencing the development and perpetuation of chronic pain and pain treatment outcomes in Veterans with chronic pain and its comorbidities, such as posttraumatic stress disorder; investigations of the effects of exercise on pain sensitivity; and studies of the efficacy of multimodal treatments, e.g., combining exercise with medications to improve physical capacity. An important nidus of the VHA's effort lies in the Pain Research Working Group (PRWG), led by Dr. Kerns, which has met by telephone monthly for many years and in face-to-face meetings in several venues. These meetings have served to enable dialog between officials from the VHA's Office of Research Development (ORD) with pain investigators, to introduce new investigators to the VHA pain research enterprise, and to foster collaborations among VHA investigators and research centers. Meetings of the PRWG in several retreats and, in recent years, at the yearly Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) meetings have enabled the interpersonal connectivity so critical to social networking in the development of a multicenter research enterprise. As an example, the VHA Center for Healthcare Equity Research and Promotion based at my VHA institution, the Philadelphia Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, supported a PRWG retreat chaired by Dr. Kerns in 2005, when I was new to the VHA, that led to my connection to VHA's Rehabilitation Research & Development Service (RR&D) and my subsequent research, education, and policy work with the Department of Defense and with several VHA investigators. The RR&D-sponsored pain state-of-the-art research conference in September 2007, focusing on Veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and chaired by Dr. Kerns, led to a special issue on VHA pain research in Pain Medicine in 2009, co-edited by Dr. Kerns and pain research leader Dr. Steve Dobscha from Oregon [2]. Dr. Kerns' extraordinary leadership in encouraging, sustaining, and expanding VHA pain research over these many years, which has been strongly supported by Dr. Kusiak and VHA ORD as well as VHA Central Office leadership, has been accompanied by a steady growth in the pain research enterprise throughout VHA. A recent highlight is the HSR&D-funded Center of Innovation ","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 1 1","pages":"xv-xvi"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67552065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advances in pain management for Veterans: Current status of research and future directions. 退伍军人疼痛管理的进展:研究现状和未来方向。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.10.0196
R. Kerns, A. Heapy, A. Heapy
Military Veterans have been identified as being particularly vulnerable to the development and perpetuation of pain [1]. Among the 23 million U.S. military Veterans, it has been estimated that as many as 50 percent of male Veterans and as many as 75 percent of female Veterans experience chronic pain [2]. Painful musculoskeletal conditions are the most common disorders among Veterans returning from the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, surpassing the rates of all mental health conditions combined [3]. Pain among these Veterans is highly comorbid with the "signature injuries" of these conflicts, namely posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury [4]. Although not unique to Veterans, compounding the challenges associated with successful management of chronic pain is continued evidence of a provider workforce that is ill-prepared to assess and manage common pain conditions [5], limited effectiveness of analgesic medications and other nonpharmacological approaches [6], and growing concerns about harms associated with long-term opioid therapy [7]. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published its seminal report, "Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research," and called on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and other Government and stakeholder groups to renew their commitment to this national transformational effort [1]. Research on pain among Veterans is not new. In fact, some of the early pioneering work to advance the multidimensional assessment of chronic pain and establish the efficacy of psychological approaches for pain management was conducted in the VA [8-9]. By 1998, former VA Undersecretary for Health Kenneth Kizer, MD, identified the need for more pain research as one of the objectives of a VA Pain Management Strategy [10]. A special topic issue of the Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (JRRD) in 2007 highlighted sustained growth in the VA pain research portfolio [11], and annual reports since that time provide evidence of yearly growth in terms of the number, scope, and financial expenditures in support of the VA's pain research portfolio. This special topic issue of JRRD presents results from pain research projects taking place in the VA healthcare system, with a focus on innovative research and its practice and policy implications. The specific objectives of the issue are to educate readers about (1) special issues faced by Veterans with pain, especially Veterans of the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; (2) potential sources of inequities in pain care that may have special relevance for Veterans; and (3) novel approaches to the assessment and treatment of pain and comorbid conditions for Veterans with pain. As such, contributions to this special issue come from the VA clinical, rehabilitation, and health services research communities as opposed to investigators conducting basic laboratory science and preclinical research. Ultimat
退伍军人被认为是特别容易发展和持续疼痛的人。据估计,在2300万美国退伍军人中,多达50%的男性退伍军人和多达75%的女性退伍军人患有慢性疼痛。肌肉骨骼疼痛是最近从伊拉克和阿富汗战争中返回的退伍军人中最常见的疾病,超过了所有精神疾病的发病率总和。这些退伍军人的疼痛与这些冲突的“标志性损伤”高度并存,即创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和创伤性脑损伤。尽管并非退伍军人独有,但与成功管理慢性疼痛相关的挑战是,持续有证据表明,医疗服务提供者在评估和管理常见疼痛状况方面准备不足,镇痛药物和其他非药物方法的有效性有限,以及对长期阿片类药物治疗相关危害的担忧日益增加。2011年,医学研究所(IOM)发表了一份开创性的报告,《缓解美国的疼痛:改变预防、护理、教育和研究的蓝图》,并呼吁退伍军人事务部(VA)和其他政府和利益相关者团体重申他们对这一国家变革努力的承诺。对退伍军人疼痛的研究并不新鲜。事实上,一些早期的开创性工作已经在VA进行,以推进慢性疼痛的多维评估,并建立心理方法对疼痛管理的有效性[8-9]。到1998年,退伍军人事务部负责卫生的前副部长肯尼斯·基泽(Kenneth Kizer)医学博士认为,需要进行更多的疼痛研究,作为退伍军人事务部疼痛管理战略bbb的目标之一。2007年《康复研究与发展杂志》(JRRD)的一个专题突出了VA疼痛研究组合的持续增长,从那时起的年度报告提供了支持VA疼痛研究组合的数量,范围和财政支出方面的年度增长的证据。本期《JRRD》专题报道了VA医疗保健系统中疼痛研究项目的成果,重点关注创新研究及其实践和政策影响。该问题的具体目标是教育读者(1)退伍军人所面临的特殊问题,特别是最近在伊拉克和阿富汗战争中的退伍军人;(2)可能与退伍军人特别相关的疼痛护理不公平的潜在来源;(3)评估和治疗退伍军人疼痛和合并症的新方法。因此,对本期特刊的贡献来自退伍军人事务部的临床、康复和卫生服务研究社区,而不是进行基础实验室科学和临床前研究的调查人员。最后,我们希望包含本期特刊的一系列原创文章能够传达出VA中与疼痛相关的强大研究项目的意义,并为进一步研究退伍军人和其他群体的疼痛管理提供一个议程。对这一专题问题的贡献提供了一个窗口,了解VA正在进行的令人兴奋的,创新的和重要的疼痛相关研究,直接通知VA应对IOM挑战的努力。仅举一个例子,移徙组织的一项重要发现是,缺乏记录疼痛的发生率和流行程度及其对日常生活和工作活动的影响、保健和社会服务的使用、疼痛和疼痛护理费用的一致数据,以及关于"改进疼痛数据的收集和报告"的建议。VA是解决这一建议的理想定位,因为它拥有美国最全面的电子健康记录(EHR)系统之一,其中包括纵向临床评估(e. ...)
{"title":"Advances in pain management for Veterans: Current status of research and future directions.","authors":"R. Kerns, A. Heapy, A. Heapy","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.10.0196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.10.0196","url":null,"abstract":"Military Veterans have been identified as being particularly vulnerable to the development and perpetuation of pain [1]. Among the 23 million U.S. military Veterans, it has been estimated that as many as 50 percent of male Veterans and as many as 75 percent of female Veterans experience chronic pain [2]. Painful musculoskeletal conditions are the most common disorders among Veterans returning from the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, surpassing the rates of all mental health conditions combined [3]. Pain among these Veterans is highly comorbid with the \"signature injuries\" of these conflicts, namely posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury [4]. Although not unique to Veterans, compounding the challenges associated with successful management of chronic pain is continued evidence of a provider workforce that is ill-prepared to assess and manage common pain conditions [5], limited effectiveness of analgesic medications and other nonpharmacological approaches [6], and growing concerns about harms associated with long-term opioid therapy [7]. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published its seminal report, \"Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research,\" and called on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and other Government and stakeholder groups to renew their commitment to this national transformational effort [1]. Research on pain among Veterans is not new. In fact, some of the early pioneering work to advance the multidimensional assessment of chronic pain and establish the efficacy of psychological approaches for pain management was conducted in the VA [8-9]. By 1998, former VA Undersecretary for Health Kenneth Kizer, MD, identified the need for more pain research as one of the objectives of a VA Pain Management Strategy [10]. A special topic issue of the Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (JRRD) in 2007 highlighted sustained growth in the VA pain research portfolio [11], and annual reports since that time provide evidence of yearly growth in terms of the number, scope, and financial expenditures in support of the VA's pain research portfolio. This special topic issue of JRRD presents results from pain research projects taking place in the VA healthcare system, with a focus on innovative research and its practice and policy implications. The specific objectives of the issue are to educate readers about (1) special issues faced by Veterans with pain, especially Veterans of the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; (2) potential sources of inequities in pain care that may have special relevance for Veterans; and (3) novel approaches to the assessment and treatment of pain and comorbid conditions for Veterans with pain. As such, contributions to this special issue come from the VA clinical, rehabilitation, and health services research communities as opposed to investigators conducting basic laboratory science and preclinical research. Ultimat","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 1 1","pages":"vii-x"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67552115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Lower-limb amputation and effect of posttraumatic stress disorder on Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient cost trends. 下肢截肢及创伤后应激障碍对退伍军人事务部门诊费用趋势的影响。
Q Medicine Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0288
V. Bhatnagar, E. Richard, T. Melcer, Jay Walker, M. Galarneau
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatient costs were analyzed for combat Veterans injured in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2001 to 2008. Patients had serious lower-limb injuries (n = 170) or unilateral (n = 460) or bilateral (n = 153) lower-limb amputation(s). Total costs over the follow-up period (2003 to 2012) and annual costs were analyzed. Unadjusted mean costs per year in 2012 U.S. dollars were $7,200, $14,700 and $18,700 for limb injuries and unilateral and bilateral lower-limb amputation(s), respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate modeling indicated that annual cost declined after the first year in the VA for Veterans with limb injuries (p < 0.001, repeated measures). In contrast, annual costs doubled after 3-5 years with unilateral (p < 0.001) and bilateral amputation(s) (p < 0.001). Among amputees, prosthetics comprised more than 50% of outpatient cost; unadjusted mean cost per year for prosthetics was 7-9 times higher in comparison with Veterans with limb injuries. Amputation status was associated with an adjusted 3.12-fold increase in mean prosthetic cost per year (p < 0.001, generalized linear model). In addition, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was associated with increased prosthetic cost by amputation status (p < 0.001) and increased psychiatric and pharmacy costs (both p < 0.001). Results indicate relatively high and sustained outpatient costs driven by prosthetics following amputation. Finally, PTSD affected cost for multiple domains of health, highlighting the importance of accurate diagnosis, treatment, and support for PTSD.
对2001年至2008年在伊拉克和阿富汗受伤的退伍军人的门诊费用进行了分析。患者有严重下肢损伤(170例)或单侧(460例)或双侧(153例)下肢截肢。分析了随访期间(2003 - 2012年)的总成本和年度成本。2012年未经调整的平均成本分别为7200美元、14700美元和18700美元,分别用于肢体损伤和单侧和双侧下肢截肢(p < 0.001)。多变量模型显示,肢体损伤退伍军人在退伍军人事务部的第一年之后,年费用下降(p < 0.001,重复测量)。相比之下,单侧截肢(p < 0.001)和双侧截肢(p < 0.001) 3-5年后的年费用翻了一番。在截肢者中,义肢占门诊费用的50%以上;与肢体受伤的退伍军人相比,每年用于假肢的未经调整的平均费用高出7-9倍。截肢状况与每年平均假肢成本增加3.12倍相关(p < 0.001,广义线性模型)。此外,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与截肢状态增加的假肢成本(p < 0.001)以及增加的精神和药物成本(p < 0.001)相关。结果表明,截肢后修复术的门诊费用相对较高且持续。最后,创伤后应激障碍影响了多个健康领域的成本,强调了准确诊断、治疗和支持创伤后应激障碍的重要性。
{"title":"Lower-limb amputation and effect of posttraumatic stress disorder on Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient cost trends.","authors":"V. Bhatnagar, E. Richard, T. Melcer, Jay Walker, M. Galarneau","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0288","url":null,"abstract":"Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatient costs were analyzed for combat Veterans injured in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2001 to 2008. Patients had serious lower-limb injuries (n = 170) or unilateral (n = 460) or bilateral (n = 153) lower-limb amputation(s). Total costs over the follow-up period (2003 to 2012) and annual costs were analyzed. Unadjusted mean costs per year in 2012 U.S. dollars were $7,200, $14,700 and $18,700 for limb injuries and unilateral and bilateral lower-limb amputation(s), respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate modeling indicated that annual cost declined after the first year in the VA for Veterans with limb injuries (p < 0.001, repeated measures). In contrast, annual costs doubled after 3-5 years with unilateral (p < 0.001) and bilateral amputation(s) (p < 0.001). Among amputees, prosthetics comprised more than 50% of outpatient cost; unadjusted mean cost per year for prosthetics was 7-9 times higher in comparison with Veterans with limb injuries. Amputation status was associated with an adjusted 3.12-fold increase in mean prosthetic cost per year (p < 0.001, generalized linear model). In addition, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was associated with increased prosthetic cost by amputation status (p < 0.001) and increased psychiatric and pharmacy costs (both p < 0.001). Results indicate relatively high and sustained outpatient costs driven by prosthetics following amputation. Finally, PTSD affected cost for multiple domains of health, highlighting the importance of accurate diagnosis, treatment, and support for PTSD.","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"52 7 1","pages":"827-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0288","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67551438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1