Nancy Murillo-García, Sara Barrio-Martínez, Esther Setién-Suero, Jordi Soler, Sergi Papiol, Mar Fatjó-Vilas, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola
Background: To study whether there is genetic overlap underlying the risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and low intelligence quotient (IQ), we reviewed and summarized the evidence on genetic variants associated with both traits.
Methods: We performed this review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and preregistered it in PROSPERO. We searched the Medline databases via PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus. We included studies in adults with a diagnosis of SSD that explored genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs], copy number variants [CNVs], genomic insertions or genomic deletions), estimated IQ and studied the relationship between genetic variability and both traits (SSD and IQ). We synthesized the results and assessed risk of bias using the Quality of Genetic Association Studies (Q-Genie) tool.
Results: Fifty-five studies met the inclusion criteria (45 case-control, 9 cross-sectional, 1 cohort), of which 55% reported significant associations for genetic variants involved in IQ and SSD. The SNPs more frequently explored through candidate gene studies were in COMT, DTNBP1, BDNF and TCF4. Through genome-wide association studies, 2 SNPs in CHD7 and GATAD2A were associated with IQ in patients with SSD. The studies on CNVs suggested significant associations between structural variants and low IQ in patients with SSD.
Limitations: Overall, primary studies used heterogeneous IQ measurement tools and had small samples. Grey literature was not screened.
Conclusion: Genetic overlap between SSD and IQ supports the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. Most of the risk polymorphisms identified were in genes relevant to brain development, neural proliferation and differentiation, and synaptic plasticity.
背景:为了研究精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSDs)和低智商(IQ)的风险是否存在遗传重叠,我们回顾和总结了与这两种特征相关的遗传变异的证据。方法:我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行了本综述,并在PROSPERO中进行了预注册。我们通过PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science和Scopus检索Medline数据库。我们纳入了诊断为SSD的成人研究,这些研究探索了遗传变异(单核苷酸多态性[snp],拷贝数变异[CNVs],基因组插入或基因组缺失),估计了智商,并研究了遗传变异与两种性状(SSD和智商)之间的关系。我们使用遗传关联研究质量(Quality of Genetic Association Studies, Q-Genie)工具综合结果并评估偏倚风险。结果:55项研究符合纳入标准(45项病例对照,9项横断面研究,1项队列研究),其中55%的研究报告了IQ和SSD相关的遗传变异的显著相关性。通过候选基因研究更经常发现的snp是COMT、DTNBP1、BDNF和TCF4。通过全基因组关联研究,发现CHD7和GATAD2A基因中的2个snp与SSD患者的智商相关。有关CNVs的研究表明,SSD患者的结构变异与低智商之间存在显著关联。局限性:总体而言,初步研究使用了异质性智商测量工具,样本量小。灰色文献未被筛选。结论:SSD和IQ基因重叠支持精神分裂症的神经发育假说。发现的大多数风险多态性与大脑发育、神经增殖和分化以及突触可塑性相关的基因有关。
{"title":"Overlap between genetic variants associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and intelligence quotient: a systematic review.","authors":"Nancy Murillo-García, Sara Barrio-Martínez, Esther Setién-Suero, Jordi Soler, Sergi Papiol, Mar Fatjó-Vilas, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To study whether there is genetic overlap underlying the risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and low intelligence quotient (IQ), we reviewed and summarized the evidence on genetic variants associated with both traits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed this review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and preregistered it in PROSPERO. We searched the Medline databases via PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus. We included studies in adults with a diagnosis of SSD that explored genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs], copy number variants [CNVs], genomic insertions or genomic deletions), estimated IQ and studied the relationship between genetic variability and both traits (SSD and IQ). We synthesized the results and assessed risk of bias using the Quality of Genetic Association Studies (Q-Genie) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five studies met the inclusion criteria (45 case-control, 9 cross-sectional, 1 cohort), of which 55% reported significant associations for genetic variants involved in IQ and SSD. The SNPs more frequently explored through candidate gene studies were in <i>COMT</i>, <i>DTNBP1</i>, <i>BDNF</i> and <i>TCF4</i>. Through genome-wide association studies, 2 SNPs in <i>CHD7</i> and <i>GATAD2A</i> were associated with IQ in patients with SSD. The studies on CNVs suggested significant associations between structural variants and low IQ in patients with SSD.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Overall, primary studies used heterogeneous IQ measurement tools and had small samples. Grey literature was not screened.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Genetic overlap between SSD and IQ supports the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. Most of the risk polymorphisms identified were in genes relevant to brain development, neural proliferation and differentiation, and synaptic plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 6","pages":"E393-E408"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/9d/47-6-E393.PMC9710545.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10351250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fern Jaspers-Fayer, Sarah Yao Lin, John R Best, Anders Lillevik Thorsen, Juliana Negreiros, Elaine Chan, Rhonda Ellwyn, Boyee Lin, Stella de Wit, Odile A van den Heuvel, S Evelyn Stewart
Background: Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with poorer planning in laboratory, school and home settings. It is unclear whether this impairment is a standalone cognitive issue or the result of OCD symptoms. No study has examined the influence of provoked distress on planning performance and neural correlates in pediatric OCD.
Methods: Before and after a symptom provocation task, youth with OCD (n = 23; 9 boys; mean age ± standard deviation 15.1 ± 2.6 years) and matched healthy controls (n = 23) completed the Tower of London task during functional MRI scanning.
Results: During planning, participants with OCD recruited the left superior frontal gyrus to a greater extent than healthy controls after symptom provocation (group × time point interaction; t44 = 5.22, p < 0.001). In a seeded, region of interest-constrained, functional connectivity analysis, we identified greater connectivity between the left superior frontal gyrus and the right middle frontal gyrus, left precuneus and left inferior parietal lobule in participants with OCD than healthy controls. We also identified greater connectivity between the right amygdala and right medial frontal gyrus in patients with OCD than healthy controls, but only before symptom provocation.
Limitations: The fixed-order design of the study and the number of participants taking medication (n = 20) should be noted.
Conclusion: Participants with OCD demonstrated greater amygdalar-cortical connectivity before symptom provocation, while sustaining greater recruitment and connectivity of task-related planning areas throughout the task. These results suggest that brain activity and connectivity is altered after symptom provocation, in the absence of impaired planning performance.
{"title":"An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.","authors":"Fern Jaspers-Fayer, Sarah Yao Lin, John R Best, Anders Lillevik Thorsen, Juliana Negreiros, Elaine Chan, Rhonda Ellwyn, Boyee Lin, Stella de Wit, Odile A van den Heuvel, S Evelyn Stewart","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with poorer planning in laboratory, school and home settings. It is unclear whether this impairment is a standalone cognitive issue or the result of OCD symptoms. No study has examined the influence of provoked distress on planning performance and neural correlates in pediatric OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Before and after a symptom provocation task, youth with OCD (<i>n</i> = 23; 9 boys; mean age ± standard deviation 15.1 ± 2.6 years) and matched healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 23) completed the Tower of London task during functional MRI scanning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During planning, participants with OCD recruited the left superior frontal gyrus to a greater extent than healthy controls after symptom provocation (group × time point interaction; <i>t</i> <sub>44</sub> = 5.22, <i>p <</i> 0.001). In a seeded, region of interest-constrained, functional connectivity analysis, we identified greater connectivity between the left superior frontal gyrus and the right middle frontal gyrus, left precuneus and left inferior parietal lobule in participants with OCD than healthy controls. We also identified greater connectivity between the right amygdala and right medial frontal gyrus in patients with OCD than healthy controls, but only before symptom provocation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The fixed-order design of the study and the number of participants taking medication (<i>n</i> = 20) should be noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with OCD demonstrated greater amygdalar-cortical connectivity before symptom provocation, while sustaining greater recruitment and connectivity of task-related planning areas throughout the task. These results suggest that brain activity and connectivity is altered after symptom provocation, in the absence of impaired planning performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 6","pages":"E409-E420"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/80/47-6-E409.PMC9710544.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10351251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Schizophrenia is characterized by hallucinations, delusions and disorganized behaviour. Recessive or X-linked transmissions are rarely described for common psychiatric disorders. We examined the genetics of psychosis to identify rare large-effect variants in patients with extreme schizophrenia.
Methods: We recruited 2 consanguineous families, each with patients affected by early-onset, severe, treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We performed exome sequencing for all participants. We checked variant rarity in public databases and with ethnically matched controls. We performed in silico analyses to assess the effects of the variants on proteins.
Results: Structured clinical evaluations supported diagnoses of schizophrenia in all patients and phenotypic absence in the unaffected individuals. Data analyses identified multiple variants. Only 1 variant per family was predicted as pathogenic by prediction tools. A homozygous c.649C > T:p.(Arg217Cys) variant in RGS3 and a hemizygous c.700A > G:p.(Thr234Ala) variant in IL1RAPL1 affected evolutionary conserved amino acid residues and were the most likely causes of phenotype in the patients of each family. Variants were ultra-rare in publicly available databases and absent from the DNA of 400 ethnically matched controls. RGS3 is implicated in modulating sensory behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Variants of IL1RAPL1 are known to cause nonsyndromic X-linked intellectual disability with or without human behavioural dysfunction.
Limitations: Each variant is unique to a particular family's patients, and findings may not be replicated.
Conclusion: Our work suggests that some rare variants may be involved in causing inherited psychosis or schizophrenia. Variant-specific functional studies will elucidate the pathophysiology relevant to schizophrenias and motivate translation to personalized therapeutics.
{"title":"<i>RGS3</i> and <i>IL1RAPL1</i> missense variants implicate defective neurotransmission in early-onset inherited schizophrenias.","authors":"Ambreen Kanwal, José V Pardo, Sadaf Naz","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophrenia is characterized by hallucinations, delusions and disorganized behaviour. Recessive or X-linked transmissions are rarely described for common psychiatric disorders. We examined the genetics of psychosis to identify rare large-effect variants in patients with extreme schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 2 consanguineous families, each with patients affected by early-onset, severe, treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We performed exome sequencing for all participants. We checked variant rarity in public databases and with ethnically matched controls. We performed in silico analyses to assess the effects of the variants on proteins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Structured clinical evaluations supported diagnoses of schizophrenia in all patients and phenotypic absence in the unaffected individuals. Data analyses identified multiple variants. Only 1 variant per family was predicted as pathogenic by prediction tools. A homozygous c.649C > T:p.(Arg217Cys) variant in <i>RGS3</i> and a hemizygous c.700A > G:p.(Thr234Ala) variant in <i>IL1RAPL1</i> affected evolutionary conserved amino acid residues and were the most likely causes of phenotype in the patients of each family. Variants were ultra-rare in publicly available databases and absent from the DNA of 400 ethnically matched controls. <i>RGS3</i> is implicated in modulating sensory behaviour in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>. Variants of <i>IL1RAPL1</i> are known to cause nonsyndromic X-linked intellectual disability with or without human behavioural dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Each variant is unique to a particular family's patients, and findings may not be replicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work suggests that some rare variants may be involved in causing inherited psychosis or schizophrenia. Variant-specific functional studies will elucidate the pathophysiology relevant to schizophrenias and motivate translation to personalized therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 6","pages":"E379-E390"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/3a/47-6-E379.PMC9633053.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9408457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zenas C Chao, Daniel G Dillon, Yi-Hung Liu, Elyssa M Barrick, Chien-Te Wu
Background: A hyperactive default mode network (DMN) has been observed in people with major depressive disorder (MDD), and weak DMN suppression has been linked to depressive symptoms. However, whether dysregulation of the DMN contributes to blunted positive emotional experience in people with MDD is unclear.
Methods: We recorded 128-channel electroencephalograms (EEGs) from 24 participants with MDD and 31 healthy controls in a resting state (RS) and an emotion-induction state (ES), in which participants engaged with emotionally positive pictures. We combined Granger causality analysis and data-driven decomposition to extract latent brain networks shared among states and groups, and we further evaluated their interactions across individuals.
Results: We extracted 2 subnetworks. Subnetwork 1 represented a delta (δ)-band (1~4 Hz) frontal network that was activated more in the ES than the RS (i.e., task-positive). Subnetwork 2 represented an alpha (α)-band (8~13 Hz) parietal network that was suppressed more in the ES than the RS (i.e., task-negative). These subnetworks were anticorrelated in both the healthy control and MDD groups, but with different sensitivities: for participants with MDD to achieve the same level of task-positive (subnetwork 1) activation as healthy controls, more suppression of task-negative (subnetwork 2) activation was necessary. Furthermore, the anticorrelation strength in participants with MDD correlated with the severity of 2 core MDD symptoms: anhedonia and rumination.
Limitations: The sample size was small.
Conclusion: Our findings revealed altered coordination between 2 functional networks in MDD and suggest that weak suppression of the task-negative α-band parietal network contributes to blunted positive emotional responses in adults with depression. The subnetworks identified here could be used for diagnosis or targeted for treatment in the future.
{"title":"Altered coordination between frontal delta and parietal alpha networks underlies anhedonia and depressive rumination in major depressive disorder.","authors":"Zenas C Chao, Daniel G Dillon, Yi-Hung Liu, Elyssa M Barrick, Chien-Te Wu","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A hyperactive default mode network (DMN) has been observed in people with major depressive disorder (MDD), and weak DMN suppression has been linked to depressive symptoms. However, whether dysregulation of the DMN contributes to blunted positive emotional experience in people with MDD is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded 128-channel electroencephalograms (EEGs) from 24 participants with MDD and 31 healthy controls in a resting state (RS) and an emotion-induction state (ES), in which participants engaged with emotionally positive pictures. We combined Granger causality analysis and data-driven decomposition to extract latent brain networks shared among states and groups, and we further evaluated their interactions across individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We extracted 2 subnetworks. Subnetwork 1 represented a delta (δ)-band (1~4 Hz) frontal network that was activated more in the ES than the RS (i.e., task-positive). Subnetwork 2 represented an alpha (α)-band (8~13 Hz) parietal network that was suppressed more in the ES than the RS (i.e., task-negative). These subnetworks were anticorrelated in both the healthy control and MDD groups, but with different sensitivities: for participants with MDD to achieve the same level of task-positive (subnetwork 1) activation as healthy controls, more suppression of task-negative (subnetwork 2) activation was necessary. Furthermore, the anticorrelation strength in participants with MDD correlated with the severity of 2 core MDD symptoms: anhedonia and rumination.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The sample size was small.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings revealed altered coordination between 2 functional networks in MDD and suggest that weak suppression of the task-negative α-band parietal network contributes to blunted positive emotional responses in adults with depression. The subnetworks identified here could be used for diagnosis or targeted for treatment in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 6","pages":"E367-E378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/3c/47-6-E367.PMC9633055.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9921153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alain Brunet, Michelle Lonergan, Sereena Pigeon, Daniel Saumier, Scott Orr, Roger Pitman
In their letter to the editor, Steenen and colleagues1 argue that the conclusions of our meta-analysis2 on the clinical efficacy of reconsolidation impairment using propranolol are “incorrect in the context of (...) psychotrauma-related symptomatology.” They claim that we did not assess risk of bias and critique our omission of 3 unpublished studies (Aikins,3 Saladin,4 and Orr5). We are not convinced by their attempt to rectify our analysis. Although this is a matter of debate,6 we were asked during the JPN peer review of our manuscript to omit unpublished data from our meta-analysis because the methodological quality of such studies is difficult to verify. Indeed, we could not verify important methodological information with respect to the unpublished results (n = 6) of Aikins,3 such as the adequacy of blinding methods. Moreover, we verified methodological information in the study by Orr5 with the author himself and concluded that the data from this pre-emptively terminated (rather than unpublished) study with n = 5 randomized participants were not suitable for meta-analytic purposes. The inclusion of studies with very small samples in a meta-analysis (n ≤ 3 per group) is bound to compromise the precision of the overall effect estimate.6 We also could not verify important information such as the outcomes used to compute the effect size for Saladin’s unpublished study of reconsolidation interference in participants with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and comorbid alcohol dependence.4 Considering that Steenen and colleagues1 argue against including studies of addiction (but see Gisquet-Verrier and colleagues7), it is unclear why they included Saladin’s study in their analysis. But even more problematic, we found
{"title":"Response to: \"Updated and rectified meta-analysis shows no effect of propranolol versus placebo on traumatic memory reconsolidation disruption\".","authors":"Alain Brunet, Michelle Lonergan, Sereena Pigeon, Daniel Saumier, Scott Orr, Roger Pitman","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220093","url":null,"abstract":"In their letter to the editor, Steenen and colleagues1 argue that the conclusions of our meta-analysis2 on the clinical efficacy of reconsolidation impairment using propranolol are “incorrect in the context of (...) psychotrauma-related symptomatology.” They claim that we did not assess risk of bias and critique our omission of 3 unpublished studies (Aikins,3 Saladin,4 and Orr5). We are not convinced by their attempt to rectify our analysis. Although this is a matter of debate,6 we were asked during the JPN peer review of our manuscript to omit unpublished data from our meta-analysis because the methodological quality of such studies is difficult to verify. Indeed, we could not verify important methodological information with respect to the unpublished results (n = 6) of Aikins,3 such as the adequacy of blinding methods. Moreover, we verified methodological information in the study by Orr5 with the author himself and concluded that the data from this pre-emptively terminated (rather than unpublished) study with n = 5 randomized participants were not suitable for meta-analytic purposes. The inclusion of studies with very small samples in a meta-analysis (n ≤ 3 per group) is bound to compromise the precision of the overall effect estimate.6 We also could not verify important information such as the outcomes used to compute the effect size for Saladin’s unpublished study of reconsolidation interference in participants with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and comorbid alcohol dependence.4 Considering that Steenen and colleagues1 argue against including studies of addiction (but see Gisquet-Verrier and colleagues7), it is unclear why they included Saladin’s study in their analysis. But even more problematic, we found","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 5","pages":"E338-E339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/2e/47-5-E338.PMC9507037.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Serge A Steenen, Roos van Westrhenen, Jan de Lange, Ad de Jongh
A recent meta-analysis published in JPN, and new data on administration of propranolol to patients with psychotrauma-related conditions, raise a number of concerns that we would like to share with the readers. Pigeon and colleagues1 performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic approaches based on reconsolidation interference theory, in the hope for a paradigm shift in the treatment of mental disorders that have an emotional memory at their core. The authors included 14 experimental studies in healthy adults and 12 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs). A pooled analysis of the included clinical trials showed that, compared with placebo, reconsolidation impairment under propranolol alleviated psychiatric symptoms and reduced cue-elicited reactivity (g = −0.42, p = 0.01). Accordingly, the authors concluded that propranolol’s clinical use is promising and deserves further controlled investigation.1 We argue that Pigeon and colleagues’ results and conclusions are affected by limitations in methodology and that their conclusions are incorrect in the context of propranolol’s effects on psychotrauma-related symptomatology. First, although the authors assessed publication bias and searched for unpublished work,1 they seem to have missed 3 unpublished trials that may have increased the risk of publication bias.2 These 3 trials were identified on ClincalTrials.gov (NCT00645450, NCT01055171) and Google Scholar (W81XWH-08–1-0491) in a very recent and highly similar meta-analysis involving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) studies specifically.3 Second, the authors failed to report risk of bias summary figures (Figure 1), and in their pooled analysis of clinical studies they included 2 trials in which physiologic response, instead of clinical symptom severity, was the primary outcome measure. Third, 5 studies involving substance dependence and abuse were included, disorders which, in the context of emotional memory, clearly have mechanistically different etiologies from disorders related to psychological trauma.48 To ensure that the value of propranolol for the health care field has been estimated correctly, we re-analyzed the data on which Pigeon and colleagues based their conclusions. We found that, if their pooled analysis of clinical studies had been restricted to low-risk-of-bias RCTs into psychotrauma-related symptomatology,56 the pooled analysis would have shown that propranolol was not statistically significantly superior to placebo (Figure 1). Moreover, if the pooled analysis is supplemented with missed and new trials,6,79,10 the 95 % confidence interval of the pooled mean difference is even wider (Figure 2). The current state of affairs in the field of clinical application of propranolol for trauma-related conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, does not fully support the notion that use of propranolol in the impairment of traumatic
{"title":"Updated and rectified meta-analysis shows no effect of propranolol versus placebo on traumatic memory reconsolidation disruption.","authors":"Serge A Steenen, Roos van Westrhenen, Jan de Lange, Ad de Jongh","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220072-l","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220072-l","url":null,"abstract":"A recent meta-analysis published in JPN, and new data on administration of propranolol to patients with psychotrauma-related conditions, raise a number of concerns that we would like to share with the readers. Pigeon and colleagues1 performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic approaches based on reconsolidation interference theory, in the hope for a paradigm shift in the treatment of mental disorders that have an emotional memory at their core. The authors included 14 experimental studies in healthy adults and 12 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs). A pooled analysis of the included clinical trials showed that, compared with placebo, reconsolidation impairment under propranolol alleviated psychiatric symptoms and reduced cue-elicited reactivity (g = −0.42, p = 0.01). Accordingly, the authors concluded that propranolol’s clinical use is promising and deserves further controlled investigation.1 We argue that Pigeon and colleagues’ results and conclusions are affected by limitations in methodology and that their conclusions are incorrect in the context of propranolol’s effects on psychotrauma-related symptomatology. First, although the authors assessed publication bias and searched for unpublished work,1 they seem to have missed 3 unpublished trials that may have increased the risk of publication bias.2 These 3 trials were identified on ClincalTrials.gov (NCT00645450, NCT01055171) and Google Scholar (W81XWH-08–1-0491) in a very recent and highly similar meta-analysis involving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) studies specifically.3 Second, the authors failed to report risk of bias summary figures (Figure 1), and in their pooled analysis of clinical studies they included 2 trials in which physiologic response, instead of clinical symptom severity, was the primary outcome measure. Third, 5 studies involving substance dependence and abuse were included, disorders which, in the context of emotional memory, clearly have mechanistically different etiologies from disorders related to psychological trauma.48 To ensure that the value of propranolol for the health care field has been estimated correctly, we re-analyzed the data on which Pigeon and colleagues based their conclusions. We found that, if their pooled analysis of clinical studies had been restricted to low-risk-of-bias RCTs into psychotrauma-related symptomatology,56 the pooled analysis would have shown that propranolol was not statistically significantly superior to placebo (Figure 1). Moreover, if the pooled analysis is supplemented with missed and new trials,6,79,10 the 95 % confidence interval of the pooled mean difference is even wider (Figure 2). The current state of affairs in the field of clinical application of propranolol for trauma-related conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, does not fully support the notion that use of propranolol in the impairment of traumatic","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 5","pages":"E336-E337"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/6e/47-5-E336.PMC9640173.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Timothy J McDermott, Hannah Berg, James Touthang, Elisabeth Akeman, Mallory J Cannon, Jessica Santiago, Kelly T Cosgrove, Ashley N Clausen, Namik Kirlic, Ryan Smith, Michelle G Craske, James L Abelson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle
Background: We have previously reported activation in reward, salience and executive control regions during functional MRI (fMRI) using an approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making task with healthy adults. Further investigations into how anxiety and depressive disorders relate to differences in neural responses during AAC can inform their understanding and treatment. We tested the hypothesis that people with anxiety or depression have altered neural activation during AAC.
Methods: We compared 118 treatment-seeking adults with anxiety or depression and 58 healthy adults using linear mixed-effects models to examine group-level differences in neural activation (fMRI) during AAC decision-making. Correlational analyses examined relationships between behavioural and neural measures.
Results: Adults with anxiety or depression had greater striatal engagement when reacting to affective stimuli (p = 0.008, d = 0.31) regardless of valence, and weaker striatal engagement during reward feedback (p = 0.046, d = -0.27) regardless of the presence of monetary reward. They also had blunted amygdala activity during decision-making (p = 0.023, d = -0.32) regardless of the presence of conflict. Across groups, approach behaviour during conflict decision-making was inversely correlated with striatal activation during affective stimuli (p < 0.001, r = -0.28) and positively related to striatal activation during reward feedback (p < 0.001, r = 0.27).
Limitations: Our transdiagnostic approach did not allow for comparisons between specific anxiety disorders, and our cross-sectional approach did not allow for causal inference.
Conclusion: Anxiety and depression were associated with altered neural responses to AAC. Findings were consistent with the role of the striatum in action selection and reward responsivity, and they point toward striatal reactivity as a future treatment target. Blunting of amygdala activity in anxiety or depression may indicate a compensatory response to inhibit affective salience and maintain approach.
{"title":"Striatal reactivity during emotion and reward relates to approach-avoidance conflict behaviour and is altered in adults with anxiety or depression.","authors":"Timothy J McDermott, Hannah Berg, James Touthang, Elisabeth Akeman, Mallory J Cannon, Jessica Santiago, Kelly T Cosgrove, Ashley N Clausen, Namik Kirlic, Ryan Smith, Michelle G Craske, James L Abelson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220083","DOIUrl":"10.1503/jpn.220083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously reported activation in reward, salience and executive control regions during functional MRI (fMRI) using an approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making task with healthy adults. Further investigations into how anxiety and depressive disorders relate to differences in neural responses during AAC can inform their understanding and treatment. We tested the hypothesis that people with anxiety or depression have altered neural activation during AAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared 118 treatment-seeking adults with anxiety or depression and 58 healthy adults using linear mixed-effects models to examine group-level differences in neural activation (fMRI) during AAC decision-making. Correlational analyses examined relationships between behavioural and neural measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults with anxiety or depression had greater striatal engagement when reacting to affective stimuli (<i>p</i> = 0.008, <i>d</i> = 0.31) regardless of valence, and weaker striatal engagement during reward feedback (<i>p</i> = 0.046, <i>d</i> = -0.27) regardless of the presence of monetary reward. They also had blunted amygdala activity during decision-making (<i>p</i> = 0.023, <i>d</i> = -0.32) regardless of the presence of conflict. Across groups, approach behaviour during conflict decision-making was inversely correlated with striatal activation during affective stimuli (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = -0.28) and positively related to striatal activation during reward feedback (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our transdiagnostic approach did not allow for comparisons between specific anxiety disorders, and our cross-sectional approach did not allow for causal inference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anxiety and depression were associated with altered neural responses to AAC. Findings were consistent with the role of the striatum in action selection and reward responsivity, and they point toward striatal reactivity as a future treatment target. Blunting of amygdala activity in anxiety or depression may indicate a compensatory response to inhibit affective salience and maintain approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 5","pages":"E311-E322"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/17/47-5-E311.PMC9448414.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10437980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cynthia K Kahl, Rose Swansburg, Tasmia Hai, James G Wrightson, Tiffany Bell, Jean-François Lemay, Adam Kirton, Frank P MacMaster
Background: Although much is known about cognitive dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), few studies have examined the pathophysiology of disordered motor circuitry. We explored differences in neurometabolite levels and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-derived corticomotor representations among children with ADHD and typically developing children.
Methods: We used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) protocols to measure excitatory (glutamate + glutamine [Glx]) and inhibitory (γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) neurometabolite levels in the dominant primary motor cortex (M1) and the supplementary motor area (SMA) in children with ADHD and typically developing children. We used robotic neuronavigated TMS to measure corticospinal excitability and create corticomotor maps.
Results: We collected data from 26 medication-free children with ADHD (aged 7-16 years) and 25 typically developing children (11-16 years). Children with ADHD had lower M1 Glx (p = 0.044, d = 0.6); their mean resting motor threshold was lower (p = 0.029, d = 0.8); their map area was smaller (p = 0.044, d = 0.7); and their hotspot density was higher (p = 0.008, d = 0.9). M1 GABA levels were associated with motor map area (p = 0.036).Limitations: Some TMS data were lost because the threshold of some children exceeded 100% of the machine output. The relatively large MRS voxel required to obtain sufficient signal-to-noise ratio and reliably measure GABA levels encompassed tissue beyond the M1, making this measure less anatomically specific.
Conclusion: The neurochemistry and neurophysiology of key nodes in the motor network may be altered in children with ADHD, and the differences appear to be related to each other. These findings suggest potentially novel neuropharmacological and neuromodulatory targets for ADHD.
背景:虽然人们对注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的认知功能障碍了解很多,但很少有研究检查运动电路紊乱的病理生理学。我们探讨了ADHD儿童和正常发育儿童在神经代谢物水平和经颅磁刺激(TMS)衍生的皮质运动表征方面的差异。方法:我们采用磁共振波谱(MRS)方法测量ADHD儿童和典型发育儿童主要初级运动皮层(M1)和辅助运动区(SMA)中的兴奋性(谷氨酸+谷氨酰胺[Glx])和抑制性(γ-氨基丁酸[GABA])神经代谢物水平。我们使用机器人神经导航TMS测量皮质脊髓兴奋性并创建皮质运动图。结果:我们收集了26名无药物治疗的ADHD儿童(7-16岁)和25名发育正常的儿童(11-16岁)的数据。ADHD患儿M1 Glx较低(p = 0.044, d = 0.6);平均静息运动阈值较低(p = 0.029, d = 0.8);其地图面积较小(p = 0.044, d = 0.7);热点密度较高(p = 0.008, d = 0.9)。M1 GABA水平与运动地图面积相关(p = 0.036)。局限性:由于部分子阈值超过了机器输出的100%,导致部分TMS数据丢失。相对较大的MRS体素需要获得足够的信噪比并可靠地测量M1以外的组织中的GABA水平,这使得该测量的解剖学特异性较低。结论:ADHD儿童运动网络关键节点的神经化学和神经生理可能发生改变,且差异具有相关性。这些发现提示了ADHD潜在的新的神经药理学和神经调节靶点。
{"title":"Differences in neurometabolites and transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.","authors":"Cynthia K Kahl, Rose Swansburg, Tasmia Hai, James G Wrightson, Tiffany Bell, Jean-François Lemay, Adam Kirton, Frank P MacMaster","doi":"10.1503/jpn.210186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although much is known about cognitive dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), few studies have examined the pathophysiology of disordered motor circuitry. We explored differences in neurometabolite levels and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-derived corticomotor representations among children with ADHD and typically developing children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) protocols to measure excitatory (glutamate + glutamine [Glx]) and inhibitory (γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) neurometabolite levels in the dominant primary motor cortex (M1) and the supplementary motor area (SMA) in children with ADHD and typically developing children. We used robotic neuronavigated TMS to measure corticospinal excitability and create corticomotor maps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data from 26 medication-free children with ADHD (aged 7-16 years) and 25 typically developing children (11-16 years). Children with ADHD had lower M1 Glx (<i>p</i> = 0.044, <i>d</i> = 0.6); their mean resting motor threshold was lower (<i>p</i> = 0.029, <i>d</i> = 0.8); their map area was smaller (<i>p</i> = 0.044, <i>d</i> = 0.7); and their hotspot density was higher (<i>p</i> = 0.008, <i>d</i> = 0.9). M1 GABA levels were associated with motor map area (<i>p</i> = 0.036).<b>Limitations:</b> Some TMS data were lost because the threshold of some children exceeded 100% of the machine output. The relatively large MRS voxel required to obtain sufficient signal-to-noise ratio and reliably measure GABA levels encompassed tissue beyond the M1, making this measure less anatomically specific.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The neurochemistry and neurophysiology of key nodes in the motor network may be altered in children with ADHD, and the differences appear to be related to each other. These findings suggest potentially novel neuropharmacological and neuromodulatory targets for ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 4","pages":"E239-E249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/6b/47-4-E239.PMC9262400.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9679498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew J Gazzellone, Dijana Oliver, Dianne Groll, Fabiano A Gomes
{"title":"Atypical antipsychotics, dystonia, and psychotic depression: old solutions for new problems.","authors":"Matthew J Gazzellone, Dijana Oliver, Dianne Groll, Fabiano A Gomes","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 3","pages":"E194-E195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/05/47-3-E194.PMC9074803.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10251829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}