Journal of Oral Implantology最新文献

This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of the local application of minocycline hydrochloride for treating peri-implantitis. Four databases-PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure-were searched from their inception through December 2020. English and Chinese randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared minocycline hydrochloride with control regimes, including negative control, iodine solution or glycerin, and chlorhexidine, for patients with peri-implant diseases were retrieved. Three outcomes-plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD), and sulcus bleeding index (SBI)-were assessed using meta-analysis based on the random-effects model. Fifteen RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis, and results suggested that minocycline hydrochloride significantly affected PLI, PD, or SBI reduction regardless of the type of comparator regime. However, subgroup analyses suggested that minocycline hydrochloride was not superior to chlorhexidine in terms of reduction of PLI (1 week: MD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.55 to 0.20, P = .36; 4 weeks: MD = -0.08, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.07, P = .28; 8 weeks: MD = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.18 to 0.16, P = .91) and PD (1 week: MD = 0.07, 95% CI = -0.27 to 0.41, P = .68; 4 weeks: MD = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.43 to 0.24, P = .58; 8 weeks: MD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.68 to 0.08, P = .12), and minocycline hydrochloride was also not better than chlorhexidine regarding reduction of SBI at 1 week after treatment (MD = -0.10; 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.01; P = .08). This study concludes that minocycline hydrochloride as adjuvant therapy of nonsurgical treatment enhances the clinical results when compared to control regimes. However, the difference between minocycline hydrochloride and chlorhexidine should be further investigated by designing additional high-quality studies with large sample sizes.

Implant planning has moved in recent years to virtual planning with a CBCT scan and fabrication of a surgical guide based on that virtual planning. Unfortunately, positioning based on prosthetics is typically missing from the CBCT scan. Use of a diagnostic guide fabricated in office permits information from ideal prosthetic positioning to improve virtual planning and subsequent fabricated of a corrected surgical guide. This becomes more important when insufficiencies in the ridges horizontal aspects (width) will require ridge augmentation to allow later implant placement. This article discusses a case with insufficient ridge width and determination of where augmentation is required to house implants in ideal prosthetic positions, the subsequent grafting, implant placement and restoration.

When extended distally due to higher loading in the posterior region, implant-supported bar-retained overdentures with cantilever bar extension exhibit greater bending moments on the implants closest to the cantilever bar and increased stresses in the overdenture components. In this study, a new abutment-bar structure connection was introduced to minimize undesired bending moments and reduce the resulting stresses by increasing the rotational mobility of the bar structure on the abutments. Copings of the bar structure were modified to have 2 spherical surfaces, sharing the same center, located at the centroid of the top surface of the coping screw head. The new connection design was applied to a 4 implant-supported mandibular overdenture to create a modified overdenture. Both the classical and modified models had bar structures with cantilever extensions in the first and second molar areas and were analyzed for deformation and stress distribution using finite element analysis, which was also conducted for both the overdenture models without cantilever bar extensions. Real-scale prototypes of both models with cantilever extensions were manufactured, assembled on implants embedded in polyurethane blocks, and subjected to fatigue testing. Both models' implants were subjected to pullout testing. The new connection design increased the rotational mobility of the bar structure, minimized the bending moment effects, and reduced the stress levels in the peri-implant bone and overdenture components, whether cantilevered or not. Our results verify the effects of rotational mobility of the bar structure on the abutments and validate the importance of the abutment-bar connection geometry as a design parameter.

Achieving favorable and stable esthetic outcomes with immediate implants used to replace maxillary anterior teeth can be challenging. Osteotomies need to be initiated along the palatal socket wall, and it is often difficult to stabilize initial drilling. An immediate implant was planned for a hopeless maxillary incisor. Using a flapless surgery technique, the tooth was removed and decoronated, and an entry point was made in the root to guide the osteotomy drills. The root was reinserted and stabilized while a precision drill and 2-mm twist drill were used in sequence to drill through the tooth root, establishing the osteotomy location but stopping 3-4 mm short of final depth. The root was then removed, and the final implant bur for a 3.5 × 11.5-mm implant was drilled to depth, engaging the necessary native bone apically. The original tooth crown was then used to prepare and insert a transitional crown. Reinserting the extracted root of a maxillary anterior tooth and using it as a guide for osteotomy preparation is an excellent method to optimally position an immediate implant palatally in the socket wall.

For several years, the implant-level impression procedure started by removal of the healing abutment, followed by connection of the impression coping to the implant. Encode Complete (Encode, Biomet 3i, Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL) was introduced to eliminate implant-level impressions by offering a healing abutment-level impression protocol. This report illustrated the treatment of a single tooth in the anterior esthetic zone using Encode Complete. A 23-year-old female patient reported to the prosthodontics clinic complaining of a fractured maxillary anterior tooth that was deemed nonrestorable. After immediate implant placement, soft tissue preservation and temporization of the implant, healing abutment level impression was made. The codes embedded on the occlusal surface communicated the implant depth, hex-orientation, platform diameter, and interface. The definitive Encode gold-plated titanium abutment was anatomically designed virtually with customized margin, contour, taper, and emergence profile. The milling process was initiated, and the virtual design data were sent to the Robocast Center for analog placement in the original Encode master cast. The definitive abutment was placed on the master cast using Robocast technology, followed by the fabrication of the final porcelain fused to zirconia cement-retained all ceramic crown. The abutment was secured to the implant with a Gold-Tite abutment screw, followed by the final cement-retained implant crown placement. Recall visits were obtained at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after final prosthesis insertion.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, tomographic, and histological performance of collagenated xenogeneic bone blocks (CXBB) in horizontal bone augmentations for implant placement. Five patients with an absence of the 4 upper incisors and an HAC 3 horizontal bone defect, with a remaining of 3 to 5 mm, underwent a bone-grafting procedure with CXBB (test group [TG], n = 5) and autogenous graft (control group [CG], n = 5), with one type of graft used on the right side and other type on the left side. Changes in bone thickness and density (tomographic evaluation), levels of complications (clinically), and distribution pattern between mineralized and nonmineralized tissue (histomorphometrically) were analyzed. Tomographic analysis showed a horizontal bone increase of 4.25 ± 0.78 mm in the TG and 3.08 ± 0.8 mm in the CG between baseline and 8 months postoperatively (P < .05). The horizontal loss between the day of installation of the blocks and 8 months postoperatively was 1.02 ± 0.39 mm for the TG and 1.10 ± 0.71 mm for the CG (P > .05). With regard to bone density, the TG blocks right after installation had 440.2 ± 89.15 HU, and after 8 months, the region reached 730.7 ± 130.98 HU, representing an increase of 29.05%. For the CG blocks, bone density increased from 1052.2 ± 398.35 HU to 1222.5 ± 453.28 HU, representing an increase of 17.03%. The increase in bone density was significantly higher in the TG (P < .05). Clinically, no cases of exposure of the bone blocks and no failure of incorporation were observed. Histomorphometrically, the percentage of mineralized tissue was lower in the TG than in the CG (48.10% ± 2.88% and 53.53% ± 1.05%, respectively), and the opposite was verified for the levels of nonmineralized tissue (52.79% ± 2.88% and 46.47% ± 1.05%, respectively; P < .05). The use of CXBB achieved higher levels of horizontal gain, with lower bone density and lower levels of mineralized tissue when compared with the use of autogenous blocks.

The size and the position of the sinus antrostomy play a key role in making sinus grafting surgery more predictable and effective with less complications. A cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scan of the maxilla were taken for a patient who is missing maxillary first molar tooth with limited residual bone. Data were exported to the dynamic navigation (DN) system software. Sinus lateral window osteotomy position and dimensions were determined and planned using four 1.5 mm diameter implants placed on the maxillary sinus lateral wall. The osteotomy was initiated following the planned four 1.5 mm implants in a parallel motion to the bone surface using dynamic navigation guidance; thus, creating an outline for the lateral sinus window. Afterword's, the lateral sinus window was greenstick fractured and the membrane was lifted; first molar implant osteotomy done, implant placed, and bone graft material was placed. The flap was sutured, and post-operative instructions and medications were given. No post-operative complications noticed. The outline of the lateral window osteotomy along with implant osteotomy can be accurately planned and executed using DN technology, which may potentially reduce complications and insure accurate placement of the implant and the graft.