Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.018
Haein Park, Daniel Wilfredo Banegas, Seung-Yong Han, Hyun Sil Kim, In-Ho Cha, Hyang Joo Ryu, Dongwook Kim
{"title":"Primary palatal sarcoma exhibiting EWSR1::RORß fusion: A first case report and literature review","authors":"Haein Park, Daniel Wilfredo Banegas, Seung-Yong Han, Hyun Sil Kim, In-Ho Cha, Hyang Joo Ryu, Dongwook Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141707472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.016
Antonia Kolokythas
{"title":"If the only constant (in life) is change then why is “letting go” so difficult?","authors":"Antonia Kolokythas","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141693643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.004
Keyur Y. Naik, Daniel Bustamante, A. Kaleem, Hans C. Brockhoff
{"title":"A Rapidly Growing Nasal Mass","authors":"Keyur Y. Naik, Daniel Bustamante, A. Kaleem, Hans C. Brockhoff","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141707611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.015
Carolina Pereira Da Silva, R. Costa, Arthur Césare Messias Viana Pereira, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Anderson Stevens Leônidas Gomes, S. Moraes, Daniela Siqueira Lopes
{"title":"Applicability of terahertz spectroscopy in Dentistry: a scoping review","authors":"Carolina Pereira Da Silva, R. Costa, Arthur Césare Messias Viana Pereira, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Anderson Stevens Leônidas Gomes, S. Moraes, Daniela Siqueira Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141702092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.011
Miriam Gabay MS OHS, Louis DiPede DMD, Maria Fornatora DMD, Jie Yang DMD MMedSc MS DMD, Chukwuebuka Ogwo DDS MSIH MSc PhD
The objective of this study was to identify treatment indications for symptomatic and asymptomatic florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD) in adult patients and explore relationships between clinical variables and radiographic findings (PROSPERO # CRD42023411228). A systematic review was conducted by independent investigators using databases: PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Database (DOSS), and TRIP to identify studies on FCOD treatment options in adults. Inclusion criteria for this systematic review included: originally in English; open-access; published between 2001 and 2021. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal checklist were used for reporting and quality assessment of each study. From the initial 122 studies, 11 fit criteria for this systematic review. Eight studies reported symptoms as clinical presentation of FCOD, 6 reported swelling, and 3 reported infection. Five studies recommended surgical treatment in symptomatic patients with anatomic structure changes around the lesions, such as presence of necrotic bone and secondary infection. Treatment of asymptomatic FCOD was contraindicated in 10 studies. Dental prophylaxis was recommended. Dental prophylaxis and monitoring were the most common management strategies for asymptomatic and symptomatic FCOD. Surgical curettage with stimulation of bleeding, or pulp vitality testing of specific areas with periapical inflammation were treatment options for symptomatic cases. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)
{"title":"Treatment indications for symptomatic versus asymptomatic florid cemento-osseous dysplasia in adult patients: A systematic review","authors":"Miriam Gabay MS OHS, Louis DiPede DMD, Maria Fornatora DMD, Jie Yang DMD MMedSc MS DMD, Chukwuebuka Ogwo DDS MSIH MSc PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.011","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to identify treatment indications for symptomatic and asymptomatic florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD) in adult patients and explore relationships between clinical variables and radiographic findings (PROSPERO # CRD42023411228). A systematic review was conducted by independent investigators using databases: PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Database (DOSS), and TRIP to identify studies on FCOD treatment options in adults. Inclusion criteria for this systematic review included: originally in English; open-access; published between 2001 and 2021. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal checklist were used for reporting and quality assessment of each study. From the initial 122 studies, 11 fit criteria for this systematic review. Eight studies reported symptoms as clinical presentation of FCOD, 6 reported swelling, and 3 reported infection. Five studies recommended surgical treatment in symptomatic patients with anatomic structure changes around the lesions, such as presence of necrotic bone and secondary infection. Treatment of asymptomatic FCOD was contraindicated in 10 studies. Dental prophylaxis was recommended. Dental prophylaxis and monitoring were the most common management strategies for asymptomatic and symptomatic FCOD. Surgical curettage with stimulation of bleeding, or pulp vitality testing of specific areas with periapical inflammation were treatment options for symptomatic cases. <END ABSTRACT> (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of photographs obtained with 3 different cameras: iPhone, Samsung, and digital single-lens reflex (DSLR), as assessed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS). This was an anonymous online survey study. The study population consisted of OMS in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts who were members of their state societies. The primary outcome variable was ratings on the quality of extraoral and intraoral photographs obtained with 3 different cameras. The predictor variable was the type of camera used to obtain the photographs: iPhone, Samsung, and DSLR camera. Descriptive statistics were computed. Spearman test was utilized to analyze correlation between the outcome variables. The majority of respondents were from full time private practice (n = 84, 77.06%), followed by full time academia (n = 12, 11.01%). The Spearman test revealed negligible correlation between extraoral and intraoral photographs on the best quality rating (0.15, = .13). Negligible correlation between extraoral and intraoral photographs were noted on the second best (0.15, = .11), and least quality rating (0.09, = .32). Study results revealed that there is no difference between the quality of photographs obtained using smartphones, compared with the photographs obtained via a DSLR camera. Future discussions on an ideal application on smartphones would allow for consent and transfer of high-quality photographs via a secure messaging system between health care providers to address ethical concerns of confidentiality. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)
{"title":"Is there a difference in quality of photographs obtained using smartphones, compared to the photographs obtained via digital single-lens reflex camera?","authors":"Pooja Gangwani DDS MPH, Sung-Kiang Chuang DMD MD DMSc, Allison Derenzi DDS, Shahid Aziz DMD MD FACS FRCSEd","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of photographs obtained with 3 different cameras: iPhone, Samsung, and digital single-lens reflex (DSLR), as assessed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS). This was an anonymous online survey study. The study population consisted of OMS in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts who were members of their state societies. The primary outcome variable was ratings on the quality of extraoral and intraoral photographs obtained with 3 different cameras. The predictor variable was the type of camera used to obtain the photographs: iPhone, Samsung, and DSLR camera. Descriptive statistics were computed. Spearman test was utilized to analyze correlation between the outcome variables. The majority of respondents were from full time private practice (n = 84, 77.06%), followed by full time academia (n = 12, 11.01%). The Spearman test revealed negligible correlation between extraoral and intraoral photographs on the best quality rating (0.15, = .13). Negligible correlation between extraoral and intraoral photographs were noted on the second best (0.15, = .11), and least quality rating (0.09, = .32). Study results revealed that there is no difference between the quality of photographs obtained using smartphones, compared with the photographs obtained via a DSLR camera. Future discussions on an ideal application on smartphones would allow for consent and transfer of high-quality photographs via a secure messaging system between health care providers to address ethical concerns of confidentiality. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141779874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.006
Elizabeth Z. Goh BDSc(Hons) MD, Nicholas Beech BSc (Neuroscience) MBBS BDS MPhil (Surgery) FRACDS(OMS), Nigel R. Johnson BDSc(Hons) MBBS MPhil (Surgery) FRACDS(OMS)
Frontal and naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures are rare but important injuries due to their anatomical complexity and proximity to vital structures. This study aims to describe the patient factors, procedural factors, and postoperative outcomes in the surgical management of these fractures. Retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or older who were surgically treated for these fractures at two Australian tertiary hospitals (2014-2020). Patient factors (demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, concomitant injuries); procedural factors (operation timing, surgical approach); and postoperative outcomes (complications, revision surgeries) were recorded. 60 cases were included (41 frontal; 29 NOE; 10 combined). Mean age was 37 (frontal) and 39 years (NOE). Most cases were male (87.8%; 75.9%). The most common mechanism was traffic accidents (29.3%; 34.5%). The most common associated facial fractures were Le Fort fractures (46.3%; 89.7%). The most common associated systemic injuries were brain injuries (36.6%; 34.5%). Mean operation timing was 13 days (frontal) and 11 days (NOE). Coronal flap was most commonly used (68.3%; 82.8%). Postoperative complication rates were 39.0% (frontal) and 37.9% (NOE). Three cases required revision surgeries. Further larger longitudinal studies are required to build knowledge and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Surgical management of frontal bone and naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures: a 7-year multi-center retrospective review","authors":"Elizabeth Z. Goh BDSc(Hons) MD, Nicholas Beech BSc (Neuroscience) MBBS BDS MPhil (Surgery) FRACDS(OMS), Nigel R. Johnson BDSc(Hons) MBBS MPhil (Surgery) FRACDS(OMS)","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"Frontal and naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures are rare but important injuries due to their anatomical complexity and proximity to vital structures. This study aims to describe the patient factors, procedural factors, and postoperative outcomes in the surgical management of these fractures. Retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or older who were surgically treated for these fractures at two Australian tertiary hospitals (2014-2020). Patient factors (demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, concomitant injuries); procedural factors (operation timing, surgical approach); and postoperative outcomes (complications, revision surgeries) were recorded. 60 cases were included (41 frontal; 29 NOE; 10 combined). Mean age was 37 (frontal) and 39 years (NOE). Most cases were male (87.8%; 75.9%). The most common mechanism was traffic accidents (29.3%; 34.5%). The most common associated facial fractures were Le Fort fractures (46.3%; 89.7%). The most common associated systemic injuries were brain injuries (36.6%; 34.5%). Mean operation timing was 13 days (frontal) and 11 days (NOE). Coronal flap was most commonly used (68.3%; 82.8%). Postoperative complication rates were 39.0% (frontal) and 37.9% (NOE). Three cases required revision surgeries. Further larger longitudinal studies are required to build knowledge and improve patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141548753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.008
Michael Schiappa DDS, Benjamin Palla DMD MD, Nicholas F. Callahan MPH DMD MD
Interfacility emergency department transfers (IETs) for maxillofacial trauma and infections are prevalent in the United States, with significant implications for health care costs. Limited availability of oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS) exacerbates unnecessary transfers and associated expenses. This study aimed to determine the incidence and costs of OMS IET. A retrospective cohort study was performed for maxillofacial trauma and infection IET at the University of Illinois Health main hospital via electronic medical record query for terms “infection [or] trauma [and] transfer.” Inclusion criteria required presentation from January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022; emergency department (ED)-ED transfer; and or consultation by OMS. Distance transferred, insurance type, location of treatment, weekend presentation, and associated costs were collected. One thousand ninety-nine records were identified, including 46 trauma IET and 122 infection IET. Costs ranged from $2,683,918.90 to $7,984,912.89, indicating ∼$1.5 billion annual expenditure across US OMS programs. Three trauma IET required urgent treatment; no infection IETs were “emergent.” Trauma IET averaged 20.7 + 17.1 miles and infection IET 22.0 + 17.4 miles for transfer distance. Among trauma IET, 28 were treated in the operating room (OR), 10 had outpatient follow-up, and 8 had ED treatment. Among infection IETs, 57 received ED treatment, 56 received OR treatment, and 9 received antibiotics/no treatment. Maxillofacial trauma and infection IET impose significant health care costs. Increased funding for OMS training may mitigate the shortage and improve patient care. Further research is needed for better triaging and reimbursement strategies.
在美国，因颌面部创伤和感染而进行的跨机构急诊科转院（IET）非常普遍，对医疗成本产生了重大影响。口腔颌面外科医生（OMS）的有限性加剧了不必要的转院和相关费用。本研究旨在确定 OMS IET 的发生率和费用。通过电子病历查询 "感染[或]外伤[和]转院 "等术语，对伊利诺伊大学健康总院的颌面外伤和感染 IET 进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入标准要求在 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间就诊；急诊科（ED）-急诊科转院；或由 OMS 会诊。收集了转院距离、保险类型、治疗地点、周末就诊情况和相关费用。确定了 199 份记录，包括 46 份创伤 IET 和 122 份感染 IET。费用从 2,683,918.90 美元到 7,984,912.89 美元不等，表明美国 OMS 项目的年支出为 15 亿美元。有三例创伤 IET 需要紧急治疗；没有感染 IET 是 "紧急 "的。外伤 IET 的平均转运距离为 20.7 + 17.1 英里，感染 IET 的平均转运距离为 22.0 + 17.4 英里。在创伤 IET 中，28 人在手术室（OR）接受了治疗，10 人在门诊接受了后续治疗，8 人在急诊室接受了治疗。在感染 IET 中，57 人接受了急诊室治疗，56 人接受了手术室治疗，9 人接受了抗生素治疗/未接受治疗。颌面部创伤和感染 IET 带来了巨大的医疗成本。增加对 OMS 培训的资金投入可缓解资金短缺问题并改善患者护理。需要进一步研究更好的分诊和报销策略。
{"title":"What are the incidence and costs associated with interfacility emergency department transfer patients treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons?","authors":"Michael Schiappa DDS, Benjamin Palla DMD MD, Nicholas F. Callahan MPH DMD MD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.06.008","url":null,"abstract":"Interfacility emergency department transfers (IETs) for maxillofacial trauma and infections are prevalent in the United States, with significant implications for health care costs. Limited availability of oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS) exacerbates unnecessary transfers and associated expenses. This study aimed to determine the incidence and costs of OMS IET. A retrospective cohort study was performed for maxillofacial trauma and infection IET at the University of Illinois Health main hospital via electronic medical record query for terms “infection [or] trauma [and] transfer.” Inclusion criteria required presentation from January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022; emergency department (ED)-ED transfer; and or consultation by OMS. Distance transferred, insurance type, location of treatment, weekend presentation, and associated costs were collected. One thousand ninety-nine records were identified, including 46 trauma IET and 122 infection IET. Costs ranged from $2,683,918.90 to $7,984,912.89, indicating ∼$1.5 billion annual expenditure across US OMS programs. Three trauma IET required urgent treatment; no infection IETs were “emergent.” Trauma IET averaged 20.7 + 17.1 miles and infection IET 22.0 + 17.4 miles for transfer distance. Among trauma IET, 28 were treated in the operating room (OR), 10 had outpatient follow-up, and 8 had ED treatment. Among infection IETs, 57 received ED treatment, 56 received OR treatment, and 9 received antibiotics/no treatment. Maxillofacial trauma and infection IET impose significant health care costs. Increased funding for OMS training may mitigate the shortage and improve patient care. Further research is needed for better triaging and reimbursement strategies.","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141939351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：