Pub Date : 2024-03-14DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00853-2
Matías Piaggio, Marisol Guzman, Eduardo Pacay, Juan Robalino, Taylor Ricketts
Approximately 3.9 billion people are at risk of infection with dengue fever, a group of viruses transmitted by mosquitoes (Halstead in Annu Rev Entomol 53:273–291, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.0933262008; WHO in WHO | Dengue and severe dengue, Geneva, 2018). In 2019, Central America suffered a severe dengue epidemic (Salinas Maldonado in Un brote de dengue pone en alerta a Centroamérica | Sociedad | EL PAÍS, El País, 2019). Costa Rica witnessed an almost doubling of the number of dengue cases in the first 24 epidemiological weeks of 2019 compared to the same period in the previous year (Ávalos in Costa Rica casi duplica número de enfermos de dengue en lo que va del año, con respecto al 2018, La Nación, 2019). In the Americas, forest cover is thought to diminish anthropogenic habitats for mosquitoes while also increasing the presence of their predators (Vasilakis et al. in Nat Rev Microbiol 9:532–541, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2595; Weterings et al. in Basic Appl Ecol 15:486–495, 2014a. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAAE.2014.07.006). In this study, we estimate the marginal effects of increasing forest cover on dengue prevalence in Costa Rica using econometric models to relate hospital admission records to forest cover maps from 2001 and 2011. We find that increasing the percentage of forest cover significantly decreases both the number of hospital admissions for dengue and the probability of an outbreak. Using the same models, we predict that if forest cover had been increased by three percentage points during 10 years (0.29% per year), 29 dengue hospital admissions per year might have been avoided (around 1.4% of cases in the country, depending on the year). This represents average savings between USD 7230 and 82,207 per year, depending on the severity of the impact on individuals with dengue. Our study demonstrates that forest conservation can serve as a public health investment, enhancing social welfare by mitigating illness and reducing associated healthcare expenditures. Our results must be interpreted with caution, however, as the characteristics of our data prevent us from confirming that the estimated negative effect of forest cover on dengue represents a causal impact.
约有 39 亿人面临感染登革热的风险,登革热是由蚊子传播的一组病毒(Halstead in Annu Rev Entomol 53:273-291, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.0933262008;WHO in WHO | Dengue and severe dengue, Geneva, 2018)。2019 年,中美洲发生了严重的登革热疫情(Salinas Maldonado in Un brote de dengue pone en alerta a Centroamérica | Sociedad | EL PAÍS, El País, 2019)。哥斯达黎加在2019年前24个流行病学周内的登革热病例数几乎比上一年同期翻了一番(Ávalos in Costa Rica casi duplica número de enfermos de dengue en lo que va del año, con respecto al 2018, La Nación, 2019)。在美洲,森林覆盖被认为减少了蚊子的人为栖息地,同时也增加了蚊子捕食者的存在(Vasilakis 等人在 Nat Rev Microbiol 9:532-541, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2595; Weterings 等人在 Basic Appl Ecol 15:486-495, 2014a. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAAE.2014.07.006)。在本研究中,我们使用计量经济模型,将 2001 年和 2011 年的入院记录与森林覆盖图联系起来,估算了增加森林覆盖率对哥斯达黎加登革热发病率的边际效应。我们发现,森林覆盖率的增加会显著降低登革热入院人数和疫情爆发的概率。使用相同的模型,我们预测,如果森林覆盖率在 10 年间提高 3 个百分点(每年 0.29%),则每年可避免 29 例登革热住院病例(约占全国病例的 1.4%,视年份而定)。根据对登革热患者影响的严重程度,每年平均可节省 7230 到 82207 美元。我们的研究表明,森林保护可以作为一项公共卫生投资,通过减轻疾病和减少相关医疗支出来提高社会福利。但是,在解释我们的研究结果时必须谨慎,因为我们的数据特点使我们无法证实估计的森林覆盖率对登革热的负面影响是因果关系。
{"title":"Forest Cover and Dengue in Costa Rica: Panel Data Analysis of the Effects of Forest Cover Change on Hospital Admissions and Outbreaks","authors":"Matías Piaggio, Marisol Guzman, Eduardo Pacay, Juan Robalino, Taylor Ricketts","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00853-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00853-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Approximately 3.9 billion people are at risk of infection with dengue fever, a group of viruses transmitted by mosquitoes (Halstead in Annu Rev Entomol 53:273–291, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.0933262008; WHO in WHO | Dengue and severe dengue, Geneva, 2018). In 2019, Central America suffered a severe dengue epidemic (Salinas Maldonado in Un brote de dengue pone en alerta a Centroamérica | Sociedad | EL PAÍS, El País, 2019). Costa Rica witnessed an almost doubling of the number of dengue cases in the first 24 epidemiological weeks of 2019 compared to the same period in the previous year (Ávalos in Costa Rica casi duplica número de enfermos de dengue en lo que va del año, con respecto al 2018, La Nación, 2019). In the Americas, forest cover is thought to diminish anthropogenic habitats for mosquitoes while also increasing the presence of their predators (Vasilakis et al. in Nat Rev Microbiol 9:532–541, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2595; Weterings et al. in Basic Appl Ecol 15:486–495, 2014a. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAAE.2014.07.006). In this study, we estimate the marginal effects of increasing forest cover on dengue prevalence in Costa Rica using econometric models to relate hospital admission records to forest cover maps from 2001 and 2011. We find that increasing the percentage of forest cover significantly decreases both the number of hospital admissions for dengue and the probability of an outbreak. Using the same models, we predict that if forest cover had been increased by three percentage points during 10 years (0.29% per year), 29 dengue hospital admissions per year might have been avoided (around 1.4% of cases in the country, depending on the year). This represents average savings between USD 7230 and 82,207 per year, depending on the severity of the impact on individuals with dengue. Our study demonstrates that forest conservation can serve as a public health investment, enhancing social welfare by mitigating illness and reducing associated healthcare expenditures. Our results must be interpreted with caution, however, as the characteristics of our data prevent us from confirming that the estimated negative effect of forest cover on dengue represents a causal impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140147474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-10DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00846-1
P. Koundouri, G. I. Papayiannis, E. V. Petracou, A. N. Yannacopoulos
In this paper we propose a consensus group decision making scheme under model uncertainty consisting of an iterative two-stage procedure based on the concept of Fréchet barycenter. Each stage consists of two steps: the agents first update their position in the opinion metric space adopting a local barycenter characterized by the agents’ immediate interactions and then a moderator makes a proposal in terms of a global barycenter, checking for consensus at each stage. In cases of large heterogeneous groups, the procedure can be complemented by an auxiliary initial homogenization stage, consisting of a clustering procedure in opinion space, leading to large homogeneous groups for which the aforementioned procedure will be applied. The scheme is illustrated in examples motivated from environmental economics.
{"title":"Consensus Group Decision Making Under Model Uncertainty with a View Towards Environmental Policy Making","authors":"P. Koundouri, G. I. Papayiannis, E. V. Petracou, A. N. Yannacopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00846-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00846-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper we propose a consensus group decision making scheme under model uncertainty consisting of an iterative two-stage procedure based on the concept of Fréchet barycenter. Each stage consists of two steps: the agents first update their position in the opinion metric space adopting a local barycenter characterized by the agents’ immediate interactions and then a moderator makes a proposal in terms of a global barycenter, checking for consensus at each stage. In cases of large heterogeneous groups, the procedure can be complemented by an auxiliary initial homogenization stage, consisting of a clustering procedure in opinion space, leading to large homogeneous groups for which the aforementioned procedure will be applied. The scheme is illustrated in examples motivated from environmental economics.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140099542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-05DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00847-0
Abstract
This article assesses the dilemma that most governments face when seeking to ensure the sustainability of their public finances through economic growth while simultaneously protecting the environment. We propose a growth model in which the government finances abatement-spending through taxation or public debt and which follows a fiscal rule that targets the long-run debt-to-GDP ratio. We show that there is a threshold for the debt ratio below which debt and environmental sustainability are secured. In steady state, the debt ratio exerts a nonlinear effect on environmental quality in the form of an inverted U-shaped curve, and the environmental tax is good for the environment when public debt is not. A fiscal rule authorizing a small but strictly positive debt ratio could help the government to implement adaptation policies for environmental protection while supporting long-run economic growth.
摘要 本文评估了大多数政府在寻求通过经济增长确保公共财政可持续性的同时保护环境时所面临的两难境地。我们提出了一个增长模型,在该模型中,政府通过税收或公共债务为削减开支提供资金,并遵循以长期债务与国内生产总值之比为目标的财政规则。我们的研究表明,债务比率存在一个临界点,低于该临界点,债务和环境可持续性都将得到保障。在稳定状态下,债务比率以倒 U 型曲线的形式对环境质量产生非线性影响,当公共债务不利于环境时,环境税对环境有利。授权较小但严格为正的债务比率的财政规则可以帮助政府在支持长期经济增长的同时,实施适应环境保护的政策。
{"title":"Fiscal and Environmental Sustainability: Is Public Debt Environmentally Friendly?","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00847-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00847-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This article assesses the dilemma that most governments face when seeking to ensure the sustainability of their public finances through economic growth while simultaneously protecting the environment. We propose a growth model in which the government finances abatement-spending through taxation or public debt and which follows a fiscal rule that targets the long-run debt-to-GDP ratio. We show that there is a threshold for the debt ratio below which debt and environmental sustainability are secured. In steady state, the debt ratio exerts a nonlinear effect on environmental quality in the form of an inverted U-shaped curve, and the environmental tax is good for the environment when public debt is not. A fiscal rule authorizing a small but strictly positive debt ratio could help the government to implement adaptation policies for environmental protection while supporting long-run economic growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140053700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00841-6
Abstract
The adverse effects of thermal power plants on crop yield have not received adequate attention. Thus, this study aims to evaluate these effects systematically to fill the gap by utilizing county-level wheat yield data from North China spanning from 2005 to 2016. Our findings indicate that the presence of an additional upwind thermal power plant is associated with a 1.4% decline in wheat yield. Notably, these yield losses are more pronounced in regions characterized by lenient environmental regulations or a high density of large-scale thermal power plants. Reduced wheat yield due to thermal power plants results in a decline in social welfare. Furthermore, we confirm that air pollution emitted from thermal power plants is the primary driver behind the decline in wheat yield.
{"title":"More Power Generation, More Wheat Losses? Evidence from Wheat Productivity in North China","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00841-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00841-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The adverse effects of thermal power plants on crop yield have not received adequate attention. Thus, this study aims to evaluate these effects systematically to fill the gap by utilizing county-level wheat yield data from North China spanning from 2005 to 2016. Our findings indicate that the presence of an additional upwind thermal power plant is associated with a 1.4% decline in wheat yield. Notably, these yield losses are more pronounced in regions characterized by lenient environmental regulations or a high density of large-scale thermal power plants. Reduced wheat yield due to thermal power plants results in a decline in social welfare. Furthermore, we confirm that air pollution emitted from thermal power plants is the primary driver behind the decline in wheat yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"171 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140034470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-21DOI: 10.1007/s10640-024-00843-4
Yingjie Niu, Zhentao Zou
We consider the robust responses to environmental disasters in stochastic growth economies. The representative agent has imprecise knowledge about environmental disasters and exhibits ambiguity aversion to the jump arrival intensity. In the equilibrium, the optimal abatement expenditure is increasing in the level of ambiguity aversion, which overturns the effect of model uncertainty on capital investment. Because of mitigating future damages, the incremental abatement may enhance long-run economic growth. In addition, welfare gains from abatement technology and the social cost of carbon become more substantial under ambiguous circumstances. Finally, we extend the baseline model by considering emission stock and find the main results still hold in this extension.
{"title":"Robust Abatement Policy with Uncertainty About Environmental Disasters","authors":"Yingjie Niu, Zhentao Zou","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00843-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00843-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We consider the robust responses to environmental disasters in stochastic growth economies. The representative agent has imprecise knowledge about environmental disasters and exhibits ambiguity aversion to the jump arrival intensity. In the equilibrium, the optimal abatement expenditure is increasing in the level of ambiguity aversion, which overturns the effect of model uncertainty on capital investment. Because of mitigating future damages, the incremental abatement may enhance long-run economic growth. In addition, welfare gains from abatement technology and the social cost of carbon become more substantial under ambiguous circumstances. Finally, we extend the baseline model by considering emission stock and find the main results still hold in this extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"180 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139920777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-03DOI: 10.1007/s10640-023-00836-9
Heather Klemick, Ann Wolverton, Bryan Parthum, Kristin Epstein, Sandra Kutzing, Sarah Armstrong
Many public water systems are struggling to locate and replace lead pipes that distribute drinking water across the United States. This study investigates factors associated with customer participation in a voluntary lead service line (LSL) inspection and replacement program. It also uses quasi-experimental and experimental methods to evaluate the causal impacts of two grant programs that subsidized homeowner replacement costs on LSL program participation. LSLs were more prevalent in areas with a higher concentration of older housing stock, Black and Hispanic residents, renters, and lower property values. Owner-occupied and higher valued properties were more likely to participate in the LSL program. Results from the two grant program evaluations suggest that subsidies for low-income homeowners to cover LSL replacement costs can significantly boost participation, but only when the programs are well publicized and easy to access. Even then, there was still significant non-participation among properties with confirmed LSLs.
{"title":"Factors Influencing Customer Participation in a Program to Replace Lead Pipes for Drinking Water","authors":"Heather Klemick, Ann Wolverton, Bryan Parthum, Kristin Epstein, Sandra Kutzing, Sarah Armstrong","doi":"10.1007/s10640-023-00836-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00836-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many public water systems are struggling to locate and replace lead pipes that distribute drinking water across the United States. This study investigates factors associated with customer participation in a voluntary lead service line (LSL) inspection and replacement program. It also uses quasi-experimental and experimental methods to evaluate the causal impacts of two grant programs that subsidized homeowner replacement costs on LSL program participation. LSLs were more prevalent in areas with a higher concentration of older housing stock, Black and Hispanic residents, renters, and lower property values. Owner-occupied and higher valued properties were more likely to participate in the LSL program. Results from the two grant program evaluations suggest that subsidies for low-income homeowners to cover LSL replacement costs can significantly boost participation, but only when the programs are well publicized and easy to access. Even then, there was still significant non-participation among properties with confirmed LSLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139678847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-02DOI: 10.1007/s10640-023-00838-7
Jonas Heckenhahn, Moritz A. Drupp
Discounting future costs and benefits is a crucial yet contentious practice in the appraisal of long-term public projects with environmental consequences. The standard approach typically neglects that ecosystem services are not easily substitutable with market goods and often exhibit considerably lower growth rates. Theory has shown that we should either apply differentiated discount rates, such as a lower environmental discount rate, or account for increases in relative scarcity by uplifting environmental values. Some governments already integrate this into their guidance, but empirical evidence is scarce. We provide first comprehensive country-specific evidence, taking Germany as a case study. We estimate growth rates of 15 ecosystem services and the degree of limited substitutability based on a meta-analysis of 36 willingness to pay studies in Germany. We find that the relative price of ecosystem services has increased by more than four percent per year in recent decades. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that relative price changes are most substantial for regulating ecosystem services. Our findings underscore the importance of considering relative price adjustments in governmental project appraisal and environmental-economic accounting.
{"title":"Relative Price Changes of Ecosystem Services: Evidence from Germany","authors":"Jonas Heckenhahn, Moritz A. Drupp","doi":"10.1007/s10640-023-00838-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00838-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Discounting future costs and benefits is a crucial yet contentious practice in the appraisal of long-term public projects with environmental consequences. The standard approach typically neglects that ecosystem services are not easily substitutable with market goods and often exhibit considerably lower growth rates. Theory has shown that we should either apply differentiated discount rates, such as a lower environmental discount rate, or account for increases in relative scarcity by uplifting environmental values. Some governments already integrate this into their guidance, but empirical evidence is scarce. We provide first comprehensive country-specific evidence, taking Germany as a case study. We estimate growth rates of 15 ecosystem services and the degree of limited substitutability based on a meta-analysis of 36 willingness to pay studies in Germany. We find that the relative price of ecosystem services has increased by more than four percent per year in recent decades. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that relative price changes are most substantial for regulating ecosystem services. Our findings underscore the importance of considering relative price adjustments in governmental project appraisal and environmental-economic accounting.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139678733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}