Tinne Gils, Jerry Hella, Bart K M Jacobs, Bianca Sossen, Madalo Mukoka, Monde Muyoyeta, Elizabeth Nakabugo, Hung Van Nguyen, Sasiwimol Ubolyam, Aurélien Macé, Marcia Vermeulen, Sarah Nyangu, Nsala Sanjase, Mohamed Sasamalo, Huong Thi Dinh, The Anh Ngo, Weerawat Manosuthi, Supunnee Jirajariyavej, Claudia M Denkinger, Nhung Viet Nguyen, Anchalee Avihingsanon, Lydia Nakiyingi, Rita Székely, Andrew D Kerkhoff, Peter MacPherson, Graeme Meintjes, Klaus Reither, Morten Ruhwald
Background: CD4 measurement is pivotal in the management of advanced HIV disease. VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease (AccuBio Limited, Alva, UK; VISITECT) is an instrument-free, point-of-care, semi-quantitative test allowing visual identification of a CD4 ≤200 cells/µl, or >200 cells/µl from finger-prick or venous blood.
Methods: As part of a diagnostic accuracy study of FUJIFILM SILVAMP TB LAM (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04089423), people living with HIV of ≥18 years old were prospectively recruited in seven countries from outpatient departments if a tuberculosis symptom was present, and from inpatient departments. Participants provided venous blood for CD4 measurement using flow cytometry (reference standard) and finger-prick blood for VISITECT (index text), performed at point-of-care. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of VISITECT to determine a CD4 ≤200 cells/µl were evaluated.
Results: Among 1604 participants, the median flow cytometry CD4 was 367 (IQR 128-626) cells/µl and 521 (32.5%) had a CD4 ≤200 cells/µl. VISITECT sensitivity was 92.7% (483/521, 95% CI 90.1-94.7%) and specificity was 61.4% (665/1083, 95% CI 58.4-64.3%). For participants with a CD4 between 0-100, 101-200, 201-300, 301-500, and >500 cells/µl, VISITECT misclassified 4.5% (95% CI 2.5-7.2%), 12.5 (95% CI 8.0-18.2%), 74.1% (95% CI 67.0-80.5%), 48.0% (95% CI 42.5-53.6%), and 22.6% (95% CI 19.3-26.3%), respectively.
Conclusions: VISITECT's sensitivity, but not specificity, met the World Health Organization's minimal sensitivity and specificity threshold of 80% for point-of-care CD4 tests. VISITECT's quality needs to be assessed and its accuracy optimized. VISITECT´s utility as CD4 triage test should be investigated.
{"title":"A prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care VISITECT CD4 Advanced Disease test in seven countries.","authors":"Tinne Gils, Jerry Hella, Bart K M Jacobs, Bianca Sossen, Madalo Mukoka, Monde Muyoyeta, Elizabeth Nakabugo, Hung Van Nguyen, Sasiwimol Ubolyam, Aurélien Macé, Marcia Vermeulen, Sarah Nyangu, Nsala Sanjase, Mohamed Sasamalo, Huong Thi Dinh, The Anh Ngo, Weerawat Manosuthi, Supunnee Jirajariyavej, Claudia M Denkinger, Nhung Viet Nguyen, Anchalee Avihingsanon, Lydia Nakiyingi, Rita Székely, Andrew D Kerkhoff, Peter MacPherson, Graeme Meintjes, Klaus Reither, Morten Ruhwald","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CD4 measurement is pivotal in the management of advanced HIV disease. VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease (AccuBio Limited, Alva, UK; VISITECT) is an instrument-free, point-of-care, semi-quantitative test allowing visual identification of a CD4 ≤200 cells/µl, or >200 cells/µl from finger-prick or venous blood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a diagnostic accuracy study of FUJIFILM SILVAMP TB LAM (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04089423), people living with HIV of ≥18 years old were prospectively recruited in seven countries from outpatient departments if a tuberculosis symptom was present, and from inpatient departments. Participants provided venous blood for CD4 measurement using flow cytometry (reference standard) and finger-prick blood for VISITECT (index text), performed at point-of-care. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of VISITECT to determine a CD4 ≤200 cells/µl were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1604 participants, the median flow cytometry CD4 was 367 (IQR 128-626) cells/µl and 521 (32.5%) had a CD4 ≤200 cells/µl. VISITECT sensitivity was 92.7% (483/521, 95% CI 90.1-94.7%) and specificity was 61.4% (665/1083, 95% CI 58.4-64.3%). For participants with a CD4 between 0-100, 101-200, 201-300, 301-500, and >500 cells/µl, VISITECT misclassified 4.5% (95% CI 2.5-7.2%), 12.5 (95% CI 8.0-18.2%), 74.1% (95% CI 67.0-80.5%), 48.0% (95% CI 42.5-53.6%), and 22.6% (95% CI 19.3-26.3%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VISITECT's sensitivity, but not specificity, met the World Health Organization's minimal sensitivity and specificity threshold of 80% for point-of-care CD4 tests. VISITECT's quality needs to be assessed and its accuracy optimized. VISITECT´s utility as CD4 triage test should be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Filemón Bucardo, Michael L Mallory, Fredman González, Yaoska Reyes, Nadja A Vielot, Boyd L Yount, Amy C Sims, Cameron Nguyen, Kaitlyn Cross, Christian Toval-Ruíz, Lester Gutiérrez, Jan Vinjé, Ralph S Baric, Lisa C Lindesmith, Sylvia Becker-Dreps
Background: Sapovirus is an important cause of acute gastroenteritis in childhood. While vaccines against sapovirus may reduce gastroenteritis burden, a major challenge to their development is a lack of information about natural immunity.
Methods: We measured sapovirus-specific IgG in serum collected, between 2017 and 2020, of mothers soon after delivery and at 6 time points in Nicaraguan children until 3 years of age (n=112 dyads) using virus-like particles representing three sapovirus genotypes (GI.1, GI.2, GV.1).
Results: Sixteen (14.3%) of the 112 children experienced at least one sapovirus gastroenteritis episode, of which GI.1 was the most common genotype. Seroconversion to GI.1 and GI.2 was most common between 5 and 12 months of age, while seroconversion to GV.1 peaked at 18 to 24 months of age. All children who experienced sapovirus GI.1 gastroenteritis seroconverted and developed genotype-specific IgG. The impact of sapovirus exposure on population immunity was determined using antigenic cartography: newborns share their mothers' broadly binding IgG responses, which declined at 5 months of age and then increased as infants experienced natural sapovirus infections.
Conclusion: By tracking humoral immunity to sapovirus over the first 3 years of life, this study provides important insights for the design and timing of future pediatric sapovirus vaccines.
{"title":"Charting the impact of maternal antibodies and repeat exposures on sapovirus immunity in early childhood from a Nicaraguan birth cohort.","authors":"Filemón Bucardo, Michael L Mallory, Fredman González, Yaoska Reyes, Nadja A Vielot, Boyd L Yount, Amy C Sims, Cameron Nguyen, Kaitlyn Cross, Christian Toval-Ruíz, Lester Gutiérrez, Jan Vinjé, Ralph S Baric, Lisa C Lindesmith, Sylvia Becker-Dreps","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sapovirus is an important cause of acute gastroenteritis in childhood. While vaccines against sapovirus may reduce gastroenteritis burden, a major challenge to their development is a lack of information about natural immunity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured sapovirus-specific IgG in serum collected, between 2017 and 2020, of mothers soon after delivery and at 6 time points in Nicaraguan children until 3 years of age (n=112 dyads) using virus-like particles representing three sapovirus genotypes (GI.1, GI.2, GV.1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen (14.3%) of the 112 children experienced at least one sapovirus gastroenteritis episode, of which GI.1 was the most common genotype. Seroconversion to GI.1 and GI.2 was most common between 5 and 12 months of age, while seroconversion to GV.1 peaked at 18 to 24 months of age. All children who experienced sapovirus GI.1 gastroenteritis seroconverted and developed genotype-specific IgG. The impact of sapovirus exposure on population immunity was determined using antigenic cartography: newborns share their mothers' broadly binding IgG responses, which declined at 5 months of age and then increased as infants experienced natural sapovirus infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By tracking humoral immunity to sapovirus over the first 3 years of life, this study provides important insights for the design and timing of future pediatric sapovirus vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Su Aung, Vlad Novitsky, Jon Steingrimsson, Fizza S Gillani, Mark Howison, Katherine Nagel, Matthew Solomon, Thomas Bertrand, Lila Bhattarai, John Fulton, Utpala Bandy, Rami Kantor
Background: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquired drug resistance (ADR) compromises antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Methods: We aggregated all HIV-1 protease-reverse transcriptase-integrase sequences over 2004-2021 at the largest HIV center in Rhode Island and evaluated ADR extent, trends, and impact using Stanford Database tools. Trends were measured with Mann-Kendall statistic, and multivariable regressions evaluated resistance predictors.
Results: Sequences were available for 914 ART-experienced persons. Overall ADR to any drug decreased from 77% to 49% (-0.66 Mann-Kendall statistic); nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 65% to 32%, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 53% to 43%, and protease inhibitors 28% to 7% (2004-2021), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors 16% to 13% (2017-2021). Multiclass resistance decreased from 44% to 12% (2-class) and 12% to 6% (3-class). In 2021, 94% had at least one 3-drug or 2-drug one-pill-once-daily (OPOD) option. Males and those exposed to more ART regimens were more likely to have ≥2-class resistance, and higher regimen exposure was also associated with fewer OPOD options.
Conclusions: Comprehensive analyses within a densely-sampled HIV epidemic over 2004-2021 demonstrated decreasing ADR. Continued ADR monitoring is important to maintain ART success, particularly with rising INSTI use in all lines of therapy and 2-drug and long-acting formulations.
{"title":"Acquired Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in Rhode Island, USA, 2004-2021.","authors":"Su Aung, Vlad Novitsky, Jon Steingrimsson, Fizza S Gillani, Mark Howison, Katherine Nagel, Matthew Solomon, Thomas Bertrand, Lila Bhattarai, John Fulton, Utpala Bandy, Rami Kantor","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquired drug resistance (ADR) compromises antiretroviral therapy (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aggregated all HIV-1 protease-reverse transcriptase-integrase sequences over 2004-2021 at the largest HIV center in Rhode Island and evaluated ADR extent, trends, and impact using Stanford Database tools. Trends were measured with Mann-Kendall statistic, and multivariable regressions evaluated resistance predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sequences were available for 914 ART-experienced persons. Overall ADR to any drug decreased from 77% to 49% (-0.66 Mann-Kendall statistic); nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 65% to 32%, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 53% to 43%, and protease inhibitors 28% to 7% (2004-2021), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors 16% to 13% (2017-2021). Multiclass resistance decreased from 44% to 12% (2-class) and 12% to 6% (3-class). In 2021, 94% had at least one 3-drug or 2-drug one-pill-once-daily (OPOD) option. Males and those exposed to more ART regimens were more likely to have ≥2-class resistance, and higher regimen exposure was also associated with fewer OPOD options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive analyses within a densely-sampled HIV epidemic over 2004-2021 demonstrated decreasing ADR. Continued ADR monitoring is important to maintain ART success, particularly with rising INSTI use in all lines of therapy and 2-drug and long-acting formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ruut Piri, Lauri Ivaska, Anna-Maija Kujari, Ilkka Julkunen, Ville Peltola, Matti Waris
Background: Prompt differentiation of viral from bacterial infections in febrile children is pivotal in reducing antibiotic overuse. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a promising viral biomarker.
Methods: We evaluated the accuracy of a point-of-care (POC) measurement for blood MxA level compared to the reference enzyme immunoassay in 228 febrile children aged between 4 weeks and 16 years, enrolled primarily at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we analyzed the ability of MxA to differentiate viral from bacterial infections.
Results: The mean difference between POC and reference MxA level was -76 µg/L (95% limits of agreement from -409 to 257 µg/L). Using a cutoff of 200 µg/L, POC results were uniform with the reference assay in 199 (87.3%) children. In ED-collected samples, the median POC MxA levels (interquartile range) were 571 [240-955] µg/L in children with viral infections, 555 (103-889) µg/L in children with viral-bacterial co-infections, and 25 (25-54) µg/L in children with bacterial infections (P < 0.001). MxA cutoff of 101 µg/L differentiated between viral and bacterial infections with 92% sensitivity and 91% specificity.
Conclusions: POC MxA measurement demonstrated acceptable analytical accuracy compared to the reference method, and good diagnostic accuracy as a biomarker for viral infections.
{"title":"Evaluation of a Novel Point-of-Care Blood Myxovirus Resistance Protein A Measurement for the Detection of Viral Infection at the Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Ruut Piri, Lauri Ivaska, Anna-Maija Kujari, Ilkka Julkunen, Ville Peltola, Matti Waris","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prompt differentiation of viral from bacterial infections in febrile children is pivotal in reducing antibiotic overuse. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a promising viral biomarker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the accuracy of a point-of-care (POC) measurement for blood MxA level compared to the reference enzyme immunoassay in 228 febrile children aged between 4 weeks and 16 years, enrolled primarily at the emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we analyzed the ability of MxA to differentiate viral from bacterial infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference between POC and reference MxA level was -76 µg/L (95% limits of agreement from -409 to 257 µg/L). Using a cutoff of 200 µg/L, POC results were uniform with the reference assay in 199 (87.3%) children. In ED-collected samples, the median POC MxA levels (interquartile range) were 571 [240-955] µg/L in children with viral infections, 555 (103-889) µg/L in children with viral-bacterial co-infections, and 25 (25-54) µg/L in children with bacterial infections (P < 0.001). MxA cutoff of 101 µg/L differentiated between viral and bacterial infections with 92% sensitivity and 91% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POC MxA measurement demonstrated acceptable analytical accuracy compared to the reference method, and good diagnostic accuracy as a biomarker for viral infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Filippo Mearelli, Alessio Nunnari, Annalisa Rombini, Federica Chitti, Francesca Spagnol, Chiara Casarsa, Giulia Bolzan, Ilaria Martini, Anna Marinelli, Stefania Rizzo, Cristiana Teso, Alessandra Macor, Nicola Fiotti, Giulia Barbati, Carlo Tascini, Venera Costantino, Stefano Di Bella, Filippo Giorgio Di Girolamo, Tiziana Bove, Daniele Orso, Giorgio Berlot, Michael Klompas, Gianni Biolo
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome with complex pathophysiology and great clinical heterogeneity which complicates the delivery of personalized therapies. Our goals were to demonstrate that some biomarkers identified as regulatory immune checkpoints in preclinical studies could 1)improve sepsis prognostication based on clinical variables and 2)guide the stratification of septic patients in subgroups with shared characteristics of immune response or survival outcomes.
Methods: We assayed the soluble counterparts of 12 biomarkers of immune response in 113 internal medicine patients with bacterial sepsis.
Results: IL-1 receptor-associated kinase M (IRAK-M) exhibited the highest hazard ratios (HRs) for increased 7-day (1.94 [1.17-3.20]) and 30-day mortality (1.61 [1.14-2.28]). HRs of IRAK-M and Galectin-1 for predicting 1-year mortality were 1.52 (1.20-1.92) and 1.64 (1.13-2.36), respectively. A prognostic model including IRAK-M, Galectin-1, and clinical variables (Charlson Comorbidty Index, multiple source of sepsis, and SOFA score) had high discrimination for death at 7 days and 30 days (area under the curve 0.90 [0.82-0.99]) and 0.86 [0.79-0.94], respectively). Patients with elevated serum levels of IRAK-M and Galectin-1 had clinical traits of immune suppression and low survival rates. None of the 12 biomarkers were independent predictors of 2-year mortality.
Conclusions: Two inhibitory immune checkpoint biomarkers (IRAK-M and Galectin-1) helped identify 3 distinct sepsis phenotypes with distinct prognoses. These biomarkers shed light on the interplay between immune dysfunction and prognosis in patients with bacterial sepsis and may prove to be useful prognostic markers, therapeutic targets, and biochemical markers for targeted enrollment in targeted therapeutic trials.
{"title":"\"Inhibitory immune checkpoints predict 7-day, in-hospital and 1-year mortality of internal medicine patients admitted with bacterial sepsis\".","authors":"Filippo Mearelli, Alessio Nunnari, Annalisa Rombini, Federica Chitti, Francesca Spagnol, Chiara Casarsa, Giulia Bolzan, Ilaria Martini, Anna Marinelli, Stefania Rizzo, Cristiana Teso, Alessandra Macor, Nicola Fiotti, Giulia Barbati, Carlo Tascini, Venera Costantino, Stefano Di Bella, Filippo Giorgio Di Girolamo, Tiziana Bove, Daniele Orso, Giorgio Berlot, Michael Klompas, Gianni Biolo","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome with complex pathophysiology and great clinical heterogeneity which complicates the delivery of personalized therapies. Our goals were to demonstrate that some biomarkers identified as regulatory immune checkpoints in preclinical studies could 1)improve sepsis prognostication based on clinical variables and 2)guide the stratification of septic patients in subgroups with shared characteristics of immune response or survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assayed the soluble counterparts of 12 biomarkers of immune response in 113 internal medicine patients with bacterial sepsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IL-1 receptor-associated kinase M (IRAK-M) exhibited the highest hazard ratios (HRs) for increased 7-day (1.94 [1.17-3.20]) and 30-day mortality (1.61 [1.14-2.28]). HRs of IRAK-M and Galectin-1 for predicting 1-year mortality were 1.52 (1.20-1.92) and 1.64 (1.13-2.36), respectively. A prognostic model including IRAK-M, Galectin-1, and clinical variables (Charlson Comorbidty Index, multiple source of sepsis, and SOFA score) had high discrimination for death at 7 days and 30 days (area under the curve 0.90 [0.82-0.99]) and 0.86 [0.79-0.94], respectively). Patients with elevated serum levels of IRAK-M and Galectin-1 had clinical traits of immune suppression and low survival rates. None of the 12 biomarkers were independent predictors of 2-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two inhibitory immune checkpoint biomarkers (IRAK-M and Galectin-1) helped identify 3 distinct sepsis phenotypes with distinct prognoses. These biomarkers shed light on the interplay between immune dysfunction and prognosis in patients with bacterial sepsis and may prove to be useful prognostic markers, therapeutic targets, and biochemical markers for targeted enrollment in targeted therapeutic trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jenna Alessandrini, Joseph Cox, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Trevor A Hart, Daniel Grace, Troy Grennan, David Moore, Gilles Lambert, Catharine Chambers, Shelley L Deeks, Ramandip Grewal, Nathan J Lachowsky, Chantal Sauvageau, Darrell H S Tan, François Coutlée, Ann N Burchell
Background: Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are a leading cause of oropharyngeal cancers. In 2015 and 2016, HPV vaccines became publicly funded for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) under 27 years of age in most Canadian provinces.
Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, sexually-active GBM in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver were recruited through respondent-driven sampling. Participants aged 16 to 30 years were invited to self-collect oral rinse specimens for HPV testing. We estimated HPV prevalence in the oral tract overall and compared these by vaccination status.
Results: Among the 838 GBM with a valid oral specimen, 36.9% reported receiving ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine. Overall, oral HPV prevalence was 2.6% (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.5, 3.7%) for at least one HPV type and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.5, 1.9%) for any high-risk type. We detected quadrivalent (HPV 6/11/16/18) vaccine-preventable types in 0.3% (95% CI: 0.0, 1.0%) of vaccinated individuals and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.0%) in unvaccinated individuals.
Conclusions: Oral HPV prevalence was low in a population of young urban GBM in Canada of whom 37% were vaccinated. Findings serve as a benchmark for monitoring of vaccination impacts on oral HPV infection within this priority population.
{"title":"Prevalence of Oral Human Papillomavirus Infection Among Urban Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men in Canada, 2017-2019.","authors":"Jenna Alessandrini, Joseph Cox, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Trevor A Hart, Daniel Grace, Troy Grennan, David Moore, Gilles Lambert, Catharine Chambers, Shelley L Deeks, Ramandip Grewal, Nathan J Lachowsky, Chantal Sauvageau, Darrell H S Tan, François Coutlée, Ann N Burchell","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae345","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are a leading cause of oropharyngeal cancers. In 2015 and 2016, HPV vaccines became publicly funded for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) under 27 years of age in most Canadian provinces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2019, sexually-active GBM in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver were recruited through respondent-driven sampling. Participants aged 16 to 30 years were invited to self-collect oral rinse specimens for HPV testing. We estimated HPV prevalence in the oral tract overall and compared these by vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 838 GBM with a valid oral specimen, 36.9% reported receiving ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine. Overall, oral HPV prevalence was 2.6% (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.5, 3.7%) for at least one HPV type and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.5, 1.9%) for any high-risk type. We detected quadrivalent (HPV 6/11/16/18) vaccine-preventable types in 0.3% (95% CI: 0.0, 1.0%) of vaccinated individuals and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.0%) in unvaccinated individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral HPV prevalence was low in a population of young urban GBM in Canada of whom 37% were vaccinated. Findings serve as a benchmark for monitoring of vaccination impacts on oral HPV infection within this priority population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nathaniel Bloom, Sydney I Ramirez, Hallie Cohn, Urvi M Parikh, Amy Heaps, Scott F Sieg, Alex Greninger, Justin Ritz, Carlee Moser, Joseph J Eron, Goran Bajic, Judith S Currier, Paul Klekotka, David A Wohl, Eric S Daar, Jonathan Li, Michael D Hughes, Kara W Chew, Davey M Smith, Shane Crotty, Camila H Coelho
Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been studied in humans, but the impact on immune memory of mAb treatment during an ongoing infection has remained unclear. We evaluated the effect of infusion of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD) mAb bamlanivimab on memory B cells (MBCs) in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Bamlanivimab treatment skewed the repertoire of memory B cells targeting Spike towards non-RBD epitopes. Furthermore, the relative affinity of RBD memory B cells was weaker in mAb-treated individuals compared to placebo-treated individuals over time. Subsequently, after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, memory B cell differences persisted and mapped to a specific reduction in recognition of the class II RBD site, the same RBD epitope recognized by bamlanivimab. These findings indicate a substantial role of antibody feedback in regulating memory B cell responses to infection, and single mAb administration can continue to impact memory B cell responses to additional antigen exposures months later.
治疗性单克隆抗体(mAb)已在人体中进行过研究,但在持续感染期间,mAb治疗对免疫记忆的影响仍不清楚。我们评估了输注抗SARS-CoV-2尖峰受体结合域(RBD)mAb巴姆兰尼单抗对SARS-CoV-2感染者记忆B细胞(MBC)的影响。Bamlanivimab 治疗使以 Spike 为靶点的记忆 B 细胞谱系偏向非 RBD 表位。此外,随着时间的推移,经 mAb 治疗的个体与经安慰剂治疗的个体相比,RBD 记忆 B 细胞的相对亲和力更弱。随后,在接种 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗后,记忆 B 细胞的差异持续存在,并映射到对 II 类 RBD 位点(即巴拉尼单抗识别的相同 RBD 表位)识别的特异性降低。这些研究结果表明,抗体反馈在调节记忆B细胞对感染的反应中起着重要作用,单次注射mAb可在数月后继续影响记忆B细胞对其他抗原的反应。
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody treatment followed by vaccination shifts human memory B cell epitope recognition suggesting antibody feedback.","authors":"Nathaniel Bloom, Sydney I Ramirez, Hallie Cohn, Urvi M Parikh, Amy Heaps, Scott F Sieg, Alex Greninger, Justin Ritz, Carlee Moser, Joseph J Eron, Goran Bajic, Judith S Currier, Paul Klekotka, David A Wohl, Eric S Daar, Jonathan Li, Michael D Hughes, Kara W Chew, Davey M Smith, Shane Crotty, Camila H Coelho","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae371","DOIUrl":"10.1093/infdis/jiae371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been studied in humans, but the impact on immune memory of mAb treatment during an ongoing infection has remained unclear. We evaluated the effect of infusion of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD) mAb bamlanivimab on memory B cells (MBCs) in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Bamlanivimab treatment skewed the repertoire of memory B cells targeting Spike towards non-RBD epitopes. Furthermore, the relative affinity of RBD memory B cells was weaker in mAb-treated individuals compared to placebo-treated individuals over time. Subsequently, after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, memory B cell differences persisted and mapped to a specific reduction in recognition of the class II RBD site, the same RBD epitope recognized by bamlanivimab. These findings indicate a substantial role of antibody feedback in regulating memory B cell responses to infection, and single mAb administration can continue to impact memory B cell responses to additional antigen exposures months later.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kara W Chew, Babafemi O Taiwo, Carlee Moser, Eric S Daar, David Alain Wohl, Justin Ritz, Arzhang Cyrus Javan, Jonathan Z Li, William Fischer, Alexander L Greninger, Christoph Bausch, Thomas Luke, Robert Call, Gene Neytman, Mark J Giganti, Courtney V Fletcher, Michael D Hughes, Joseph J Eron, Judith S Currier, Davey M Smith
Background: To address the need for novel COVID-19 therapies, we evaluated the fully-human polyclonal antibody product SAB-185 in a phase 3 clinical trial.
Methods: Non-hospitalized high-risk adults within 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset were randomized 1:1 to open-label SAB-185 3,840 units/kg or casirivimab/imdevimab 1200 mg. Non-inferiority comparison was undertaken for the pre-Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab expected to be fully active) and superiority comparison for the Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab not expected to be active). Primary outcomes were the composite of all-cause hospitalizations/deaths and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through day 28. Secondary outcomes included time to sustained symptom improvement and resolution.
Results: Enrollment was terminated early due to low hospitalization/death rates upon Omicron emergence. 733 adults were randomized, 255 included in pre-Omicron and 392 in Omicron analysis populations. Hospitalizations/deaths occurred in 6 (5.0%) and 3 (2.2%) of pre-Omicron SAB-185 and casirivimab/imdevimab arms, respectively (absolute difference [95% CI] 2.7% [-2.3%, 8.6%]), inconclusive for non-inferiority; and 5 (2.5%) versus 3 (1.5%) (absolute difference 1.0% [-2.3%, 4.5%]) for Omicron. Risk ratios for grade ≥3 TEAEs were 0.94 [0.52, 1.71] (pre-Omicron) and 1.71 [0.96, 3.07] (Omicron). Time to symptom improvement and resolution were shorter for SAB-185, median 11 vs 14 (pre-Omicron) and 11 vs 13 days (Omicron) (symptom improvement), and 16 vs 24 days and 18 vs >25 days (symptom resolution), p<0.05 for symptom resolution for Omicron only.
Conclusions: SAB-185 had an acceptable safety profile with faster symptom resolution in the Omicron population. Additional studies are needed to characterize its efficacy for COVID-19.
背景为了满足对新型COVID-19疗法的需求,我们在一项3期临床试验中评估了全人多克隆抗体产品SAB-185:方法:在COVID-19症状出现后7天内的非住院高危成人按1:1随机分配至开放标签SAB-185 3,840单位/公斤或卡西利韦单抗/伊马单抗1200毫克。对Omicron前人群进行了非劣效性比较(预计卡西利单抗/伊美单抗完全活跃),对Omicron人群进行了优效性比较(预计卡西利单抗/伊美单抗不活跃)。主要结果是全因住院/死亡和第28天≥3级治疗突发不良事件(TEAE)的复合结果。次要结果包括症状持续改善和缓解的时间:由于 Omicron 出现后住院率/死亡率较低,因此提前终止了入组。733 名成人接受了随机治疗,其中 255 人接受了奥美康治疗前的分析,392 人接受了奥美康治疗后的分析。Omicron前SAB-185和casirivimab/imdevimab两组分别有6人(5.0%)和3人(2.2%)发生住院/死亡(绝对差异[95% CI] 2.7% [-2.3%, 8.6%]),非劣效性不确定;Omicron两组分别有5人(2.5%)和3人(1.5%)发生住院/死亡(绝对差异1.0% [-2.3%, 4.5%])。≥3级TEAE的风险比分别为0.94 [0.52,1.71](奥美康前)和1.71 [0.96,3.07](奥美康)。SAB-185 的症状改善和缓解时间更短,中位数分别为 11 天 vs 14 天(奥美康前)和 11 天 vs 13 天(奥美康)(症状改善),16 天 vs 24 天和 18 天 vs >25 天(症状缓解),P 结论:SAB-185具有可接受的安全性,在奥米控人群中症状缓解更快。还需要进行更多研究来确定其对 COVID-19 的疗效。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of SAB-185 for Non-hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Kara W Chew, Babafemi O Taiwo, Carlee Moser, Eric S Daar, David Alain Wohl, Justin Ritz, Arzhang Cyrus Javan, Jonathan Z Li, William Fischer, Alexander L Greninger, Christoph Bausch, Thomas Luke, Robert Call, Gene Neytman, Mark J Giganti, Courtney V Fletcher, Michael D Hughes, Joseph J Eron, Judith S Currier, Davey M Smith","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae369","DOIUrl":"10.1093/infdis/jiae369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To address the need for novel COVID-19 therapies, we evaluated the fully-human polyclonal antibody product SAB-185 in a phase 3 clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-hospitalized high-risk adults within 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset were randomized 1:1 to open-label SAB-185 3,840 units/kg or casirivimab/imdevimab 1200 mg. Non-inferiority comparison was undertaken for the pre-Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab expected to be fully active) and superiority comparison for the Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab not expected to be active). Primary outcomes were the composite of all-cause hospitalizations/deaths and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through day 28. Secondary outcomes included time to sustained symptom improvement and resolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment was terminated early due to low hospitalization/death rates upon Omicron emergence. 733 adults were randomized, 255 included in pre-Omicron and 392 in Omicron analysis populations. Hospitalizations/deaths occurred in 6 (5.0%) and 3 (2.2%) of pre-Omicron SAB-185 and casirivimab/imdevimab arms, respectively (absolute difference [95% CI] 2.7% [-2.3%, 8.6%]), inconclusive for non-inferiority; and 5 (2.5%) versus 3 (1.5%) (absolute difference 1.0% [-2.3%, 4.5%]) for Omicron. Risk ratios for grade ≥3 TEAEs were 0.94 [0.52, 1.71] (pre-Omicron) and 1.71 [0.96, 3.07] (Omicron). Time to symptom improvement and resolution were shorter for SAB-185, median 11 vs 14 (pre-Omicron) and 11 vs 13 days (Omicron) (symptom improvement), and 16 vs 24 days and 18 vs >25 days (symptom resolution), p<0.05 for symptom resolution for Omicron only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAB-185 had an acceptable safety profile with faster symptom resolution in the Omicron population. Additional studies are needed to characterize its efficacy for COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew E Levy, Vanessa Chilunda, Richard E Davis, Phillip R Heaton, Pamala A Pawloski, Jason D Goldman, Cynthia A Schandl, Lisa M McEwen, Elizabeth T Cirulli, Dana Wyman, Andrew Dei Rossi, Hang Dai, Magnus Isaksson, Nicole L Washington, Tracy Basler, Kevin Tsan, Jason Nguyen, Jimmy Ramirez, Efren Sandoval, William Lee, James Lu, Shishi Luo
Within a multi-state viral genomic surveillance program, we evaluated whether proportions of SARS-CoV-2 infections attributed to the JN.1 variant and to XBB-lineage variants (including HV.1 and EG.5) differed between inpatient and outpatient care settings during periods of cocirculation. Both JN.1 and HV.1 were less likely than EG.5 to account for infections among inpatients versus outpatients (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.84; p=0.003] and aOR=0.35 [95% CI: 0.21-0.58; p<0.001], respectively). JN.1 and HV.1 variants may be associated with a lower risk of severe illness. The severity of COVID-19 may have attenuated as predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages shifted from EG.5 to HV.1 to JN.1.
{"title":"Reduced Likelihood of Hospitalization with the JN.1 or HV.1 SARS-CoV-2 Variants Compared to the EG.5 Variant.","authors":"Matthew E Levy, Vanessa Chilunda, Richard E Davis, Phillip R Heaton, Pamala A Pawloski, Jason D Goldman, Cynthia A Schandl, Lisa M McEwen, Elizabeth T Cirulli, Dana Wyman, Andrew Dei Rossi, Hang Dai, Magnus Isaksson, Nicole L Washington, Tracy Basler, Kevin Tsan, Jason Nguyen, Jimmy Ramirez, Efren Sandoval, William Lee, James Lu, Shishi Luo","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within a multi-state viral genomic surveillance program, we evaluated whether proportions of SARS-CoV-2 infections attributed to the JN.1 variant and to XBB-lineage variants (including HV.1 and EG.5) differed between inpatient and outpatient care settings during periods of cocirculation. Both JN.1 and HV.1 were less likely than EG.5 to account for infections among inpatients versus outpatients (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.84; p=0.003] and aOR=0.35 [95% CI: 0.21-0.58; p<0.001], respectively). JN.1 and HV.1 variants may be associated with a lower risk of severe illness. The severity of COVID-19 may have attenuated as predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages shifted from EG.5 to HV.1 to JN.1.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The progression from Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to active tuberculosis (TB) disease varies among individuals, and identifying biomarkers to predict progression is crucial for guiding interventions. In this study, we aimed to determine plasma immune biomarker profiles in healthy household contacts of index pulmonary TB (PTB) patients who either progressed to TB or remained as non-progressors.
Methods: A cohort of household contacts of adults with PTB was enrolled, consisting of 15 contacts who progressed to TB disease and 15 non-progressors. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months to identify predictive TB progression markers.
Results: Our findings revealed that individuals in the progressor group exhibited significantly decreased levels of IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα, IL1α, IL1β, IL-17A, and IL-1Ra at baseline, months 4 and 12. In contrast, the progressor group displayed significantly elevated levels of IFNα, IFNβ, IL-6, IL-12, GM-CSF, IL-10, IL-33, CCL2, CCL11, CXCL8, CXCL10, CX3CL1, VEGF, Granzyme-B and PDL-1 compared to the non-progressor group at baseline, months 4 and 12. ROC analysis identified IFNγ, GM-CSF, IL-1Ra, CCL2 and CXCL10 as the most promising predictive markers, with an AUC of ≥90. Furthermore, combinatorial analysis demonstrated that GM-CSF, CXCL10 and IL-1Ra, when used in combination, exhibited high accuracy in predicting progression to active TB disease.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that a specific set of plasma biomarkers GM-CSF, CXCL10 and IL-1Ra, can effectively identify household contacts at significant risk of developing TB disease. These findings have important implications for early intervention and preventive strategies in TB-endemic regions.
{"title":"Plasma Immune Biomarkers Predictive of Progression to Active Tuberculosis in Household Contacts of TB Patients.","authors":"Anuradha Rajamanickam, Evangeline Ann Daniel, Bindu Dasan, Kannan Thiruvengadam, Padmapriyadarsini Chandrasekaran, Sanjay Gaikwad, Sathyamurthi Pattabiraman, Brindha Bhanu, Amsaveni Sivaprakasam, Vandana Kulkarni, Rajesh Karyakarte, Mandar Paradkar, Shri Vijay Bala Yogendra Shivakumar, Vidya Mave, Amita Gupta, Luke Elizabeth Hanna, Subash Babu","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The progression from Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to active tuberculosis (TB) disease varies among individuals, and identifying biomarkers to predict progression is crucial for guiding interventions. In this study, we aimed to determine plasma immune biomarker profiles in healthy household contacts of index pulmonary TB (PTB) patients who either progressed to TB or remained as non-progressors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of household contacts of adults with PTB was enrolled, consisting of 15 contacts who progressed to TB disease and 15 non-progressors. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months to identify predictive TB progression markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings revealed that individuals in the progressor group exhibited significantly decreased levels of IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα, IL1α, IL1β, IL-17A, and IL-1Ra at baseline, months 4 and 12. In contrast, the progressor group displayed significantly elevated levels of IFNα, IFNβ, IL-6, IL-12, GM-CSF, IL-10, IL-33, CCL2, CCL11, CXCL8, CXCL10, CX3CL1, VEGF, Granzyme-B and PDL-1 compared to the non-progressor group at baseline, months 4 and 12. ROC analysis identified IFNγ, GM-CSF, IL-1Ra, CCL2 and CXCL10 as the most promising predictive markers, with an AUC of ≥90. Furthermore, combinatorial analysis demonstrated that GM-CSF, CXCL10 and IL-1Ra, when used in combination, exhibited high accuracy in predicting progression to active TB disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that a specific set of plasma biomarkers GM-CSF, CXCL10 and IL-1Ra, can effectively identify household contacts at significant risk of developing TB disease. These findings have important implications for early intervention and preventive strategies in TB-endemic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}