{"title":"Journal of Dental Education Volume 89 Number 11/November 2025","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13609","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":"89 11","pages":"1547-1548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jdd.13609","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145522271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susan H. Kass, Danielle Rulli, Nicole S. Kimmes, Ryan L. Quock
{"title":"There's Always Something to Learn","authors":"Susan H. Kass, Danielle Rulli, Nicole S. Kimmes, Ryan L. Quock","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70085","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":"89 11","pages":"1549-1550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145522278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Motivations and Barriers to Orthodontics as a Career Choice: Findings From a Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Kailyn Fiocca, Brooke Bruneman, Faeq Quadri","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yi-Jia Sun, Yi-Feng Zhao, Lei Zhang, Li-Jun Luo, Yue Zhou, Yan Zhang, Xue Han, Min Zhou
Aim: This study aims to construct a knowledge graph in the field of periodontology and develop a knowledge-graph-based intelligent question-answering (QA) system, with the goal of enhancing the structured management and intelligent application of periodontal disease knowledge.
Materials and methods: Consensus documents and evidence-based guidelines from the EFP and AAP served as primary data sources. Entities and relationships related to periodontal diseases were extracted using a large language model-assisted semantic approach to generate structured quintuple data. A knowledge graph was constructed in Neo4j, upon which a graph-enhanced intelligent PerioMind system was developed.
Results: A total of 26 authoritative documents were included, from which 1894 knowledge quintuples were extracted, resulting in a knowledge graph comprising 1872 nodes and 1894 edges. The PerioMind system, developed on top of the graph, demonstrated efficient parsing of natural language queries and the generation of professional responses. The system achieved the following evaluation scores (out of 5): accuracy 4.8, interpretability 4.4, domain relevance 4.8, and completeness 4.5.
Conclusion: This study developed a structured knowledge graph and the PerioMind system for periodontology, supporting intelligent diagnosis, education, and research. Future work will expand knowledge coverage and enhance semantic reasoning to advance an intelligent knowledge service platform.
{"title":"Integrating Clinical and Systemic Knowledge in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Disease Education Through a Knowledge Graph.","authors":"Yi-Jia Sun, Yi-Feng Zhao, Lei Zhang, Li-Jun Luo, Yue Zhou, Yan Zhang, Xue Han, Min Zhou","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to construct a knowledge graph in the field of periodontology and develop a knowledge-graph-based intelligent question-answering (QA) system, with the goal of enhancing the structured management and intelligent application of periodontal disease knowledge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consensus documents and evidence-based guidelines from the EFP and AAP served as primary data sources. Entities and relationships related to periodontal diseases were extracted using a large language model-assisted semantic approach to generate structured quintuple data. A knowledge graph was constructed in Neo4j, upon which a graph-enhanced intelligent PerioMind system was developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 authoritative documents were included, from which 1894 knowledge quintuples were extracted, resulting in a knowledge graph comprising 1872 nodes and 1894 edges. The PerioMind system, developed on top of the graph, demonstrated efficient parsing of natural language queries and the generation of professional responses. The system achieved the following evaluation scores (out of 5): accuracy 4.8, interpretability 4.4, domain relevance 4.8, and completeness 4.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study developed a structured knowledge graph and the PerioMind system for periodontology, supporting intelligent diagnosis, education, and research. Future work will expand knowledge coverage and enhance semantic reasoning to advance an intelligent knowledge service platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ítallo Emídio Lira Viana, Karina Fiona Irusa, Carlos Kose
Purpose/objectives: To evaluate the effects of mandatory attendance on the theoretical and practical grades of two consecutive classes in the Operative Dentistry II preclinical course at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM).
Methods: The theoretical and practical grades of students from two consecutive academic years were extracted and analyzed without any identifying information. For the theoretical portion, the final grade was used (45% midterm, 45% final exam, and 10% quizzes). For the practical component, the average of the three competency assessments was considered, along with performance on each competency separately. Data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05).
Results: Students in the year with mandatory attendance showed significantly higher performance in both theoretical and average practical grades (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile intervals) theoretical grade was 91.380 (86.957-95.205) in the non-mandatory group and 93.825 (88.730-96.930) in the mandatory group. For the practical component, medians were 78.333 (73.333-83.333) and 82.5 (79.5-86.25), respectively. When competencies were analyzed individually, no statistically significant difference was found for the second and third procedures (p = 0.153 and 0.619), but the non-mandatory group performed significantly better in the first competency (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Within the conditions of this Operative Dentistry II preclinical course, mandatory attendance was associated with higher overall performance in both theoretical and practical assessments. However, when individual competencies were analyzed separately, results varied, suggesting that the impact of mandatory attendance may not be uniform across all skill areas.
{"title":"The Effects of Mandatory Attendance on the Students' Overall Performance in an Operative Dentistry Preclinical Course: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Ítallo Emídio Lira Viana, Karina Fiona Irusa, Carlos Kose","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of mandatory attendance on the theoretical and practical grades of two consecutive classes in the Operative Dentistry II preclinical course at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The theoretical and practical grades of students from two consecutive academic years were extracted and analyzed without any identifying information. For the theoretical portion, the final grade was used (45% midterm, 45% final exam, and 10% quizzes). For the practical component, the average of the three competency assessments was considered, along with performance on each competency separately. Data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students in the year with mandatory attendance showed significantly higher performance in both theoretical and average practical grades (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile intervals) theoretical grade was 91.380 (86.957-95.205) in the non-mandatory group and 93.825 (88.730-96.930) in the mandatory group. For the practical component, medians were 78.333 (73.333-83.333) and 82.5 (79.5-86.25), respectively. When competencies were analyzed individually, no statistically significant difference was found for the second and third procedures (p = 0.153 and 0.619), but the non-mandatory group performed significantly better in the first competency (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the conditions of this Operative Dentistry II preclinical course, mandatory attendance was associated with higher overall performance in both theoretical and practical assessments. However, when individual competencies were analyzed separately, results varied, suggesting that the impact of mandatory attendance may not be uniform across all skill areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study examines Howard University College of Dentistry's (HUCD) contributions to dental education, focusing on its role in strengthening workforce representation, expanding access to care in dental health professional shortage areas (DHPSAs) and medically underserved areas (MUAs), and addressing persistent oral health disparities.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 1473 HUCD graduates from the Classes of 2004-2023, using data verified through publicly available sources. Variables included gender, race/ethnicity, and practice location. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping identified practices within DHPSAs and MUAs, and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method was used to calculate accessibility scores for census tracts in Washington, DC.
Results: Among 1292 graduates with complete data, 59% were female and 50% identified as African American. On average, 68.4% of graduates practiced in DHPSAs or MUAs, with higher levels of service in communities with larger African American (19.98%) and Hispanic/Latino (20.10%) populations. GIS analysis showed concentrations of HUCD graduates in the Washington, DC, Beltway and Texas. The 2SFCA mapping revealed that Wards 5, 7, and 8, areas with the largest African American populations in Washington, DC, experience the most significant access challenges, and the HUCD's clinic primarily serve patients from these areas.
Conclusion: HUCD has demonstrated success in preparing graduates to provide care in underserved communities, advancing its mission to improve oral health outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of continued investment in educational models that strengthen the workforce and expand access to care.
{"title":"Workforce Representation and Service in Shortage Areas: Outcomes of a HBCU College of Dentistry, Class 2004-2023.","authors":"Marzia Mustamand, Minxuan Lan, Esther Childers, Cheryl Fryer, Kingsley Kanjin, Emma Ta-Zhou, Najah Abduh, Whittley Deleveaux, Raheem Pierre, Gail Cherry-Peppers, Reginald Salter, Deborah Nixon-Willis, Tanya Greenfield, Dexter Woods, Andrea Jackson, Xinbin Gu","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines Howard University College of Dentistry's (HUCD) contributions to dental education, focusing on its role in strengthening workforce representation, expanding access to care in dental health professional shortage areas (DHPSAs) and medically underserved areas (MUAs), and addressing persistent oral health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 1473 HUCD graduates from the Classes of 2004-2023, using data verified through publicly available sources. Variables included gender, race/ethnicity, and practice location. Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping identified practices within DHPSAs and MUAs, and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method was used to calculate accessibility scores for census tracts in Washington, DC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1292 graduates with complete data, 59% were female and 50% identified as African American. On average, 68.4% of graduates practiced in DHPSAs or MUAs, with higher levels of service in communities with larger African American (19.98%) and Hispanic/Latino (20.10%) populations. GIS analysis showed concentrations of HUCD graduates in the Washington, DC, Beltway and Texas. The 2SFCA mapping revealed that Wards 5, 7, and 8, areas with the largest African American populations in Washington, DC, experience the most significant access challenges, and the HUCD's clinic primarily serve patients from these areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HUCD has demonstrated success in preparing graduates to provide care in underserved communities, advancing its mission to improve oral health outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of continued investment in educational models that strengthen the workforce and expand access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paula Rodrigues-Pereira, Maria Amália Pereira Dias-Calças, Alex Moreira Mélo, Melissa de Oliveira Melchior, Lucas Gaspar Ribeiro, Antônio Pazin-Filho, Jardel Franciso Mazzi-Chaves, Laís Valencise Magri
Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and orofacial pain (OFP) demand advanced diagnostic and clinical reasoning skills in dental education. Traditional simulations with real patients face limitations in availability and standardization. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI), such as ChatGPT-3.5, has emerged as a potential tool for clinical training.
Methods: This blinded, cross-sectional, crossover study involved 30 undergraduate dental students, each completing two simulated cases: one with ChatGPT-3.5 and one with standardized real patients. Cases were developed and validated by TMD/OFP specialists via the Delphi method and incorporated into the AI through structured prompts. Quantitative parameters (such as responses, word count, follow-up questions, reformulations, and diagnostic accuracy) and qualitative aspects (such as empathy, clarity, and relevant information) were analyzed.
Results: GAI simulations provided higher information density (231 vs.167 relevant units; p < 0.001) and clearer reasoning flow. Students interacting with real patients asked more follow-up questions (p = 0.004) and required more reformulations (p = 0.011), indicating more adaptive communication. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Relevant information correlated positively with diagnostic accuracy (r = 0.484; p = 0.007), whereas total word count correlated negatively (r = -0.386; p = 0.035).
Conclusions: ChatGPT-3.5 matched real patient simulations in diagnostic reasoning for TMD/OFP. Combining GAI's scalability and standardization with real patient variability may optimize clinical competency training.
背景:颞下颌疾病(TMDs)和口腔面部疼痛(OFP)在牙科教育中需要先进的诊断和临床推理技能。传统的真实患者模拟在可用性和标准化方面存在局限性。ChatGPT-3.5等生成式人工智能(GAI)已成为临床培训的潜在工具。方法:这项盲法、横断面、交叉研究涉及30名牙科本科学生,每人完成两个模拟病例:一个是ChatGPT-3.5,另一个是标准化的真实患者。案例由TMD/OFP专家通过德尔菲法开发和验证,并通过结构化提示整合到AI中。定量参数(如回答、字数、后续问题、重新表述和诊断准确性)和定性方面(如移情、清晰度和相关信息)进行了分析。结果:GAI模拟提供了更高的信息密度(231比167个相关单位;p 0.05)。相关信息与诊断准确性正相关(r = 0.484; p = 0.007),而总字数负相关(r = -0.386; p = 0.035)。结论:ChatGPT-3.5在TMD/OFP的诊断推理中与真实患者模拟相匹配。将GAI的可扩展性和标准化与患者的真实可变性相结合,可以优化临床能力培训。
{"title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Case Simulation in Temporomandibular Disorder Education: ChatGPT Versus Real Patients.","authors":"Paula Rodrigues-Pereira, Maria Amália Pereira Dias-Calças, Alex Moreira Mélo, Melissa de Oliveira Melchior, Lucas Gaspar Ribeiro, Antônio Pazin-Filho, Jardel Franciso Mazzi-Chaves, Laís Valencise Magri","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and orofacial pain (OFP) demand advanced diagnostic and clinical reasoning skills in dental education. Traditional simulations with real patients face limitations in availability and standardization. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI), such as ChatGPT-3.5, has emerged as a potential tool for clinical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This blinded, cross-sectional, crossover study involved 30 undergraduate dental students, each completing two simulated cases: one with ChatGPT-3.5 and one with standardized real patients. Cases were developed and validated by TMD/OFP specialists via the Delphi method and incorporated into the AI through structured prompts. Quantitative parameters (such as responses, word count, follow-up questions, reformulations, and diagnostic accuracy) and qualitative aspects (such as empathy, clarity, and relevant information) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GAI simulations provided higher information density (231 vs.167 relevant units; p < 0.001) and clearer reasoning flow. Students interacting with real patients asked more follow-up questions (p = 0.004) and required more reformulations (p = 0.011), indicating more adaptive communication. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Relevant information correlated positively with diagnostic accuracy (r = 0.484; p = 0.007), whereas total word count correlated negatively (r = -0.386; p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-3.5 matched real patient simulations in diagnostic reasoning for TMD/OFP. Combining GAI's scalability and standardization with real patient variability may optimize clinical competency training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Medical and dental education share the common goal of preparing clinically competent and socially responsible health professionals. Despite this shared goal, the two disciplines have evolved as distinct academic fields, with limited empirical comparisons between them. Understanding their commonalities and differences can foster mutual development and cross-disciplinary collaboration. This study aims to compare research priorities in medical and dental education by analyzing author keywords from representative journals in each field.
Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using author keywords from two medical education journals (Advances in Health Sciences Education and BMC Medical Education) and two dental education journals (European Journal of Dental Education and Journal of Dental Education) over a 10-year period (2015-2024). Data were retrieved from the Web of Science database, including only original research articles and review articles. Frequency analysis of the top 10 author keywords was performed in 2-year intervals, and bump charts were created to visualize temporal ranking changes. In addition, co-occurrence network maps were constructed using all keywords appearing 10 or more times over the study period. Data processing and visualization were conducted using VOSviewer and Tableau software.
Results: A total of 9391 articles were analyzed, comprising 6806 articles from medical education journals and 2585 articles from dental education journals. Both fields consistently emphasized "students," "assessment," and "curriculum" as core research topics. However, medical education placed greater emphasis on "postgraduate medical education" and student mental health (e.g., empathy, resilience, and depression), whereas dental education focused more on "educational technology" and clinical skills development (e.g., simulation, virtual reality, and psychomotor skills). The keyword "covid-19" emerged prominently in both fields from 2019 to 2020 onward, reflecting the pandemic's transformative impact on education. "Interprofessional education" appeared as a shared emerging theme, suggesting growing recognition of collaborative practice needs.
Conclusion: This study identifies both foundational commonalities and discipline-specific innovations in medical and dental education research over the past decade. These findings suggest that shared interests and distinctive priorities can lead to meaningful opportunities for collaborative educational development and joint research efforts across health professions education.
目的:医学和牙科教育的共同目标是培养具有临床能力和对社会负责的卫生专业人员。尽管有这个共同的目标,但这两个学科已经发展成为不同的学术领域,它们之间的实证比较有限。了解它们的共性和差异可以促进相互发展和跨学科合作。本研究旨在通过分析医学和牙科教育领域代表性期刊的作者关键词,比较医学和牙科教育的研究重点。方法:采用2015-2024年10年间两种医学教育期刊(Advances in Health Sciences education和BMC medical education)和两种牙科教育期刊(European Journal of dental education和Journal of dental education)的作者关键词进行文献计量分析。数据从Web of Science数据库中检索,仅包括原创研究文章和综述文章。以2年为间隔对排名前10位的作者关键词进行频率分析,并创建凹凸图来可视化排名的时间变化。此外,使用在研究期间出现10次或以上的所有关键词构建共现网络地图。使用VOSviewer和Tableau软件对数据进行处理和可视化。结果:共分析文献9391篇,其中医学教育类期刊6806篇,口腔教育类期刊2585篇。这两个领域始终强调“学生”、“评估”和“课程”是核心研究课题。然而,医学教育更强调“研究生医学教育”和学生心理健康(例如,移情、恢复力和抑郁),而牙科教育更侧重于“教育技术”和临床技能发展(例如,模拟、虚拟现实和精神运动技能)。从2019年到2020年,“covid-19”这个关键词在这两个领域都出现了突出的位置,反映了疫情对教育的变革性影响。“跨专业教育”作为一个共同的新兴主题出现,表明人们越来越认识到合作实践的需求。结论:本研究确定了过去十年医学和牙科教育研究的基本共性和学科特定创新。这些发现表明,共同的兴趣和独特的优先事项可以为卫生专业教育的合作教育发展和联合研究工作带来有意义的机会。
{"title":"Research Trends in Medical and Dental Education (2015-2024) Based on Author Keywords: Commonalities, Differences, and Opportunities for Collaboration.","authors":"Yoon Min Gil","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medical and dental education share the common goal of preparing clinically competent and socially responsible health professionals. Despite this shared goal, the two disciplines have evolved as distinct academic fields, with limited empirical comparisons between them. Understanding their commonalities and differences can foster mutual development and cross-disciplinary collaboration. This study aims to compare research priorities in medical and dental education by analyzing author keywords from representative journals in each field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis was conducted using author keywords from two medical education journals (Advances in Health Sciences Education and BMC Medical Education) and two dental education journals (European Journal of Dental Education and Journal of Dental Education) over a 10-year period (2015-2024). Data were retrieved from the Web of Science database, including only original research articles and review articles. Frequency analysis of the top 10 author keywords was performed in 2-year intervals, and bump charts were created to visualize temporal ranking changes. In addition, co-occurrence network maps were constructed using all keywords appearing 10 or more times over the study period. Data processing and visualization were conducted using VOSviewer and Tableau software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9391 articles were analyzed, comprising 6806 articles from medical education journals and 2585 articles from dental education journals. Both fields consistently emphasized \"students,\" \"assessment,\" and \"curriculum\" as core research topics. However, medical education placed greater emphasis on \"postgraduate medical education\" and student mental health (e.g., empathy, resilience, and depression), whereas dental education focused more on \"educational technology\" and clinical skills development (e.g., simulation, virtual reality, and psychomotor skills). The keyword \"covid-19\" emerged prominently in both fields from 2019 to 2020 onward, reflecting the pandemic's transformative impact on education. \"Interprofessional education\" appeared as a shared emerging theme, suggesting growing recognition of collaborative practice needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identifies both foundational commonalities and discipline-specific innovations in medical and dental education research over the past decade. These findings suggest that shared interests and distinctive priorities can lead to meaningful opportunities for collaborative educational development and joint research efforts across health professions education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This study investigated whether interaction-focused clinical training with older adults reduces ageist attitudes among dental students, compared to treatment-focused training without interpersonal interaction.
Methods: A quasi-experimental, non-randomized, two-arm pre-post intervention study was conducted at two dental universities in Japan. Fifth-year undergraduate students were recruited (n = 120) and analyzed (n = 91). Students participated in either a treatment-focused (treatment group, n = 34) or interaction-focused program involving oral care and recreational activities with older adults (interaction group, n = 57). Ageist attitudes were assessed at baseline and end of intervention using Japanese version of Fraboni Scale of the Ageism (FSA-J) and the Aging Scale for Dental Students (ASDS-J); higher scores indicate greater ageism. A general linear model (GLM) was used to analyze factors related to score changes (educational intervention, adjusting for baseline score, gender, age, and cohabitation experience).
Results: Ninety-one students completed all assessments. FSA-J scores worsened significantly in the treatment group (p = 0.002, Hedges' g = 0.534), while ASDS-J scores improved significantly in the interaction group (p = 0.011, Hedges' g = - 0.313). GLM revealed no main effect of intervention alone, but significant three-way interactions with gender, age, and cohabitation experience were found for ASDS-J changes. Age was the only significant factor associated with FSA-J change. Effect sizes were small across outcomes.
Conclusions: Interaction-focused training may help reduce dental student-specific ageism. However, general ageism appear less responsive to brief interventions. With small effects observed, interaction-focused training offers a modest step toward reducing student-specific ageism; general ageism showed limited short-term change.
{"title":"Changes in General and Dental-Specific Ageism Following Home-Visit Clinical Training With Older Adults: A Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Study.","authors":"Akie Fujimoto, Maya Izumi, Yuko Imai, Nao Suzuki, Sumio Akifusa","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated whether interaction-focused clinical training with older adults reduces ageist attitudes among dental students, compared to treatment-focused training without interpersonal interaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental, non-randomized, two-arm pre-post intervention study was conducted at two dental universities in Japan. Fifth-year undergraduate students were recruited (n = 120) and analyzed (n = 91). Students participated in either a treatment-focused (treatment group, n = 34) or interaction-focused program involving oral care and recreational activities with older adults (interaction group, n = 57). Ageist attitudes were assessed at baseline and end of intervention using Japanese version of Fraboni Scale of the Ageism (FSA-J) and the Aging Scale for Dental Students (ASDS-J); higher scores indicate greater ageism. A general linear model (GLM) was used to analyze factors related to score changes (educational intervention, adjusting for baseline score, gender, age, and cohabitation experience).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one students completed all assessments. FSA-J scores worsened significantly in the treatment group (p = 0.002, Hedges' g = 0.534), while ASDS-J scores improved significantly in the interaction group (p = 0.011, Hedges' g = - 0.313). GLM revealed no main effect of intervention alone, but significant three-way interactions with gender, age, and cohabitation experience were found for ASDS-J changes. Age was the only significant factor associated with FSA-J change. Effect sizes were small across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interaction-focused training may help reduce dental student-specific ageism. However, general ageism appear less responsive to brief interventions. With small effects observed, interaction-focused training offers a modest step toward reducing student-specific ageism; general ageism showed limited short-term change.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra Rasdal, Eleanor Streitwieser, Cynthia Rabuck, Faizan Alawi
: Various stressors can affect student exam performance, and a single weak result may not reflect true understanding. To address this, a "Mastery" exam policy was introduced in the 2021-2022 academic year. If a student scores below 80% on a didactic or pre-clinical laboratory exam worth at least 10% of their final course grade, they can choose to retake the exam. The reassessment is a new exam, and may differ in format from the original. The formally recorded grade is the higher of the two scores, up to a maximum of 80%.
Method: Data from the 2021-2024 academic years were analyzed, tracking exam and course grades for all students. Original scores were retained for comparison with final grades before and after Mastery.
Results: Overall, 47.1% of the students completed at least one Mastery exam, with 83.6% improving their scores. At our institution, students are placed on academic probation after one course failure, and risk dismissal after a second failure. Improved performances on Mastery exams resulted in 85.2% of students originally at risk of at least academic probation avoiding any formal administrative action. The initiative was well-received-89.8% of surveyed students reported improved morale, well-being, and reduced exam-related stress.
Conclusion: This institution-wide initiative yielded several important academic outcomes, including fewer final course failures and fewer students at risk of academic probation or dismissal. This supports the notion that any given exam may be only a reflection of the student's ability to perform to their capabilities at the specific time the exam is administered.
{"title":"Mastery Exams: Giving Students a Second Opportunity to Demonstrate Understanding.","authors":"Alexandra Rasdal, Eleanor Streitwieser, Cynthia Rabuck, Faizan Alawi","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> : Various stressors can affect student exam performance, and a single weak result may not reflect true understanding. To address this, a \"Mastery\" exam policy was introduced in the 2021-2022 academic year. If a student scores below 80% on a didactic or pre-clinical laboratory exam worth at least 10% of their final course grade, they can choose to retake the exam. The reassessment is a new exam, and may differ in format from the original. The formally recorded grade is the higher of the two scores, up to a maximum of 80%.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from the 2021-2024 academic years were analyzed, tracking exam and course grades for all students. Original scores were retained for comparison with final grades before and after Mastery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 47.1% of the students completed at least one Mastery exam, with 83.6% improving their scores. At our institution, students are placed on academic probation after one course failure, and risk dismissal after a second failure. Improved performances on Mastery exams resulted in 85.2% of students originally at risk of at least academic probation avoiding any formal administrative action. The initiative was well-received-89.8% of surveyed students reported improved morale, well-being, and reduced exam-related stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This institution-wide initiative yielded several important academic outcomes, including fewer final course failures and fewer students at risk of academic probation or dismissal. This supports the notion that any given exam may be only a reflection of the student's ability to perform to their capabilities at the specific time the exam is administered.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}