首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
Effects of a Digital Multidomain Cognitive Intervention in Older People at High Risk of Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 数字多域认知干预对老年痴呆高危人群的影响:一项随机临床试验
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m15860
Yuanjiao Yan, Xinying Lin, Ying Lu, Zixin Fang, Xiaozhen Fu, Shaobo Wu, Bingjie Wei, Zhengmin Wang, Yunzhen Chen, Zhi Chen, Rong Lin, Hong Li

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a 6-month digital multidomain cognitive intervention on cognitive function and psychosocial outcomes in older adults at high risk of dementia.

Methods: A 2-arm, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Fujian Provincial Hospital and 4 community health care centers (April 2024 to December 2024). Participants (N=166, aged ≥60 years, modified dementia risk score >79) were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to a 6-month digital multidomain cognitive intervention and control group. Primary outcomes included general cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) scores; secondary outcomes covered memory (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test [ROCFT] and Auditory Verbal Learning Test), language (Verbal Fluency Test and Boston Naming Test), executive function and attention (Shape Trails Test), visuospatial skill (ROCFT), mobility (Activity of Daily Living and Berg Balance Scale), psychosocial status (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease), and health-promoting behaviors (Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II and Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices). Intention-to-treat analysis with random forest imputation was performed.

Results: A total of 154 participants (92.77%) completed the trial. Compared to the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in general cognitive function, visuospatial memory, and loneliness, including MoCA (t=2.106, P=.037), ROCFT immediate and long-delay recall (Z=-2.789, P=.05; t=2.797, P=.05), and UCLA Loneliness Scale (Z=-2.641, P=.008). No statistically significant between-group differences emerged in other indicators.

Conclusion: A 6-month digital multidomain intervention significantly enhanced general cognitive function and visuospatial memory and reduced loneliness in older adults at high risk for dementia. These results highlight the potential of WeChat-based delivery models to provide feasible, acceptable, and widely applicable solutions for dementia risk reduction in aging populations.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT06442943.

目的:评估6个月数字多领域认知干预对老年痴呆高危人群认知功能和心理社会结局的影响。方法:于2024年4月至2024年12月在福建省立医院和4个社区卫生保健中心进行2组随机临床试验。参与者(N=166,年龄≥60岁,修正痴呆风险评分>79)按1:1随机分为为期6个月的数字多域认知干预组和对照组。主要结局包括一般认知功能(蒙特利尔认知评估[MoCA])评分;次要结果包括记忆(Rey-Osterrieth复杂图形测试[ROCFT]和听觉言语学习测试)、语言(言语流畅性测试和波士顿命名测试)、执行功能和注意力(形状轨迹测试)、视觉空间技能(ROCFT)、行动能力(日常生活活动和伯格平衡量表)、社会心理状态(15项老年抑郁量表、Zung自评焦虑量表、UCLA孤独量表和生活质量-阿尔茨海默病)。和健康促进行为(健康促进生活方式概况II和健康实践自评能力)。使用随机森林imputation进行意向处理分析。结果:154名受试者(92.77%)完成试验。与对照组相比,干预组在MoCA (t=2.106, P= 0.037)、ROCFT即时和长延迟回忆(Z=-2.789, P= 0.05; t=2.797, P= 0.05)和UCLA孤独量表(Z=-2.641, P= 0.008)的一般认知功能、视觉空间记忆和孤独感方面均有显著改善。其他指标组间差异无统计学意义。结论:为期6个月的数字多域干预可显著增强老年痴呆症高危人群的一般认知功能和视觉空间记忆,减少孤独感。这些结果突出了基于微信的交付模式的潜力,为降低老年人痴呆症风险提供了可行、可接受和广泛适用的解决方案。试验注册:临床试验。gov标识符:NCT06442943。
{"title":"Effects of a Digital Multidomain Cognitive Intervention in Older People at High Risk of Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Yuanjiao Yan, Xinying Lin, Ying Lu, Zixin Fang, Xiaozhen Fu, Shaobo Wu, Bingjie Wei, Zhengmin Wang, Yunzhen Chen, Zhi Chen, Rong Lin, Hong Li","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m15860","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.25m15860","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the effects of a 6-month digital multidomain cognitive intervention on cognitive function and psychosocial outcomes in older adults at high risk of dementia.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> A 2-arm, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Fujian Provincial Hospital and 4 community health care centers (April 2024 to December 2024). Participants (N=166, aged ≥60 years, modified dementia risk score >79) were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to a 6-month digital multidomain cognitive intervention and control group. Primary outcomes included general cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) scores; secondary outcomes covered memory (Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test [ROCFT] and Auditory Verbal Learning Test), language (Verbal Fluency Test and Boston Naming Test), executive function and attention (Shape Trails Test), visuospatial skill (ROCFT), mobility (Activity of Daily Living and Berg Balance Scale), psychosocial status (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease), and health-promoting behaviors (Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II and Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices). Intention-to-treat analysis with random forest imputation was performed.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A total of 154 participants (92.77%) completed the trial. Compared to the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in general cognitive function, visuospatial memory, and loneliness, including MoCA (<i>t</i>=2.106, <i>P</i>=.037), ROCFT immediate and long-delay recall (<i>Z</i>=-2.789, <i>P</i>=.05; <i>t</i>=2.797, <i>P</i>=.05), and UCLA Loneliness Scale (<i>Z</i>=-2.641, <i>P</i>=.008). No statistically significant between-group differences emerged in other indicators.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> A 6-month digital multidomain intervention significantly enhanced general cognitive function and visuospatial memory and reduced loneliness in older adults at high risk for dementia. These results highlight the potential of WeChat-based delivery models to provide feasible, acceptable, and widely applicable solutions for dementia risk reduction in aging populations.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT06442943.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rechallenge of Lamotrigine After Rash: A Systematic Review. 皮疹后再次使用拉莫三嗪:一项系统综述。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25r15987
Hannah R Riva, Sabrina Zheng, Nehaa Sohail, Sabrina A Newman, Patricia E Ortiz

Objective: This study aims to characterize the rate of successful rechallenge considering the risk of recurrence of cutaneous adverse reactions with reintroduction of lamotrigine, as well as how to characterize cutaneous reactions appropriately, and important considerations in deciding whether to attempt reintroduction of lamotrigine.

Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included lamotrigine, rash, and rechallenge or reintroduction.

Study Selection: The resulting articles (59) were imported into Covidence. After screening and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 11 articles were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis: Variables extracted included study design, age of patient, lamotrigine dosing regimen, concomitant valproate use, use of other concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, rash timing after starting lamotrigine, rash description, rash diagnosis, dermatologist evaluation, skin biopsy, hospitalization, time from initial rash onset until rechallenge, rechallenge lamotrigine dosing regimen, and response.

Results: There were 106 cases of rechallenge of lamotrigine. Over half (57%) of patients were female, and the average age was 35 years. Time from discontinuation of lamotrigine until rechallenge ranged from 1 week to 26 months, and there were 12 cases that continued lamotrigine without interruption or by reducing the dose. Patients who were rechallenged with lamotrigine successfully typically started the rechallenge with either 5 mg or 12.5 mg daily with a gradual upward titration until reaching desired dose. Successful rechallenge occurred in 84% of cases; reasons for unsuccessful rechallenge included severe or intolerable rash or other symptoms. Only 3 out of 106 cases had a dermatologist confirm the initial rash diagnosis.

Conclusions: Lamotrigine has been rechallenged safely in select cases; however, it is critical to confirm that the initial rash did not have specific features of a severe rash in order to proceed with safe reintroduction of lamotrigine. This article analyzes the cases in the literature to date and gives recommendations for how to assess whether to rechallenge lamotrigine.

目的:本研究旨在描述重新引入拉莫三嗪后考虑皮肤不良反应复发风险的再挑战成功率,以及如何正确描述皮肤反应,以及决定是否尝试重新引入拉莫三嗪的重要考虑因素。数据来源:对PubMed、SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库进行系统综述。搜索词包括拉莫三嗪,皮疹,再挑战或重新引入。研究选择:将得到的文章(59篇)导入到Covidence中。在筛选和应用纳入/排除标准后,纳入了11篇文章。数据提取和综合:提取的变量包括研究设计、患者年龄、拉莫三嗪给药方案、同时使用丙戊酸盐、同时使用其他酶诱导抗癫痫药物、拉莫三嗪起疹时间、皮疹描述、皮疹诊断、皮肤科医生评价、皮肤活检、住院、从首次起疹到再次起疹的时间、再次起疹的拉莫三嗪给药方案和反应。结果:106例患者再次使用拉莫三嗪。超过一半(57%)的患者为女性,平均年龄为35岁。从拉莫三嗪停药到再次服用的时间从1周到26个月不等,有12例患者在没有中断或减少剂量的情况下继续使用拉莫三嗪。成功重新使用拉莫三嗪的患者通常以每天5毫克或12.5毫克的剂量开始重新使用,逐渐向上滴定,直到达到所需剂量。再次挑战成功的病例占84%;再挑战失败的原因包括严重或无法忍受的皮疹或其他症状。106例病例中只有3例皮肤科医生证实了最初的皮疹诊断。结论:拉莫三嗪在部分病例中可以安全重新使用;然而,重要的是要确认最初的皮疹没有严重皮疹的具体特征,以便继续安全重新引入拉莫三嗪。本文分析了迄今为止文献中的病例,并就如何评估是否重新使用拉莫三嗪提出了建议。
{"title":"Rechallenge of Lamotrigine After Rash: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hannah R Riva, Sabrina Zheng, Nehaa Sohail, Sabrina A Newman, Patricia E Ortiz","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25r15987","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.25r15987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to characterize the rate of successful rechallenge considering the risk of recurrence of cutaneous adverse reactions with reintroduction of lamotrigine, as well as how to characterize cutaneous reactions appropriately, and important considerations in deciding whether to attempt reintroduction of lamotrigine.</p><p><p><b>Data Sources:</b> A systematic review was conducted of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included lamotrigine, rash, and rechallenge or reintroduction.</p><p><p><b>Study Selection:</b> The resulting articles (59) were imported into Covidence. After screening and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 11 articles were included.</p><p><p><b>Data Extraction and Synthesis:</b> Variables extracted included study design, age of patient, lamotrigine dosing regimen, concomitant valproate use, use of other concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, rash timing after starting lamotrigine, rash description, rash diagnosis, dermatologist evaluation, skin biopsy, hospitalization, time from initial rash onset until rechallenge, rechallenge lamotrigine dosing regimen, and response.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> There were 106 cases of rechallenge of lamotrigine. Over half (57%) of patients were female, and the average age was 35 years. Time from discontinuation of lamotrigine until rechallenge ranged from 1 week to 26 months, and there were 12 cases that continued lamotrigine without interruption or by reducing the dose. Patients who were rechallenged with lamotrigine successfully typically started the rechallenge with either 5 mg or 12.5 mg daily with a gradual upward titration until reaching desired dose. Successful rechallenge occurred in 84% of cases; reasons for unsuccessful rechallenge included severe or intolerable rash or other symptoms. Only 3 out of 106 cases had a dermatologist confirm the initial rash diagnosis.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Lamotrigine has been rechallenged safely in select cases; however, it is critical to confirm that the initial rash did not have specific features of a severe rash in order to proceed with safe reintroduction of lamotrigine. This article analyzes the cases in the literature to date and gives recommendations for how to assess whether to rechallenge lamotrigine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Suicide Attempts and Psychiatric Hospitalization Among Brazilian Health Care Professionals. 巴西卫生保健专业人员自杀企图和精神病住院的危险因素。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m15858
Rodolfo Furlan Damiano, Marianna de Abreu, Carolina Blaya Dreher, Craig J Bryan, Eurípedes Constantino Miguel, Marcelo Fleck, Gisele Gus Manfro, Giovanni Abrahão Salum

Background: Health care professionals face elevated suicide risk, yet longitudinal studies during occupational crises are lacking. We investigated factors associated with suicide attempts and psychiatric hospitalizations in health care workers seeking emotional support during COVID-19.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated 3,087 Brazilian health care professionals enrolled in a digital mental health trial (May-July 2020). Participants were recruited nationwide from May 2020 to December 2021. From this cohort, 2,815 with complete baseline data comprised the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample. Outcomes were assessed at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Baseline predictors included demographics, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item 9 (suicidal ideation), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System T-scores (depression, anxiety, irritability, sleep), life satisfaction, and burnout. Cox models examined associations; inverse probability weighting addressed attrition. Additive interaction was quantified using relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI).

Results: In the total sample, 53 participants (1.59%) attempted suicide. In the ITT sample (86% female, mean age 36.5), 46 (1.63%) attempted suicide (64 events), and 60 (2.22%) required psychiatric hospitalization. Nearly every day ideation (hazard ratio [HR]=39.58, 95% CI, 14.03-111.64, P<.001), severe sleep disturbances (HR=17.39, 95% CI, 2.05-147.46, P=.009), and male sex (HR=2.08, 95% CI, 1.01-4.26, P=.046) independently predicted attempts. The 24-week attempt probability reached 57.1% for individuals with both ideation and sleep problems versus 1.2% with neither, with 40% of the combined risk attributable to synergistic interaction (RERI=11.51). Notably, 28.3% of attempts occurred among individuals denying baseline ideation. For hospitalizations, only nearly every day ideation remained significant (HR=8.11, 95% CI, 3.10-21.18, P<.001). Results remained robust after weighting.

Conclusions: Daily suicidal ideation and severe sleep disturbances synergistically elevate suicide risk among health care professionals. Findings support a comprehensive assessment incorporating sleep disturbances and multicomponent interventions targeting both domains simultaneously.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04635618, NCT04632082.

背景:卫生保健专业人员面临较高的自杀风险,但在职业危机期间缺乏纵向研究。我们调查了在COVID-19期间寻求情感支持的医护人员自杀企图和精神病院的相关因素。方法:我们前瞻性地评估了参加数字心理健康试验(2020年5月至7月)的3087名巴西卫生保健专业人员。参与者于2020年5月至2021年12月在全国范围内招募。从该队列中,有2,815例具有完整基线数据的意向治疗(ITT)样本。在4周、12周和24周时评估结果。基线预测因素包括人口统计学、患者健康问卷-9第9项(自杀意念)、患者报告结果测量信息系统t评分(抑郁、焦虑、易怒、睡眠)、生活满意度和倦怠。Cox模型检验了关联;逆概率加权处理损耗。使用相互作用的相对超额风险(rei)对加性相互作用进行量化。结果:总样本中有53人(1.59%)自杀未遂。在ITT样本中(86%为女性,平均年龄36.5岁),46人(1.63%)企图自杀(64次),60人(2.22%)需要精神病院治疗。几乎每天的想法(风险比[HR]=39.58, 95% CI, 14.03-111.64, PP= 0.009)和男性(HR=2.08, 95% CI, 1.01-4.26, P= 0.046)独立预测尝试。同时存在思维和睡眠问题的个体在24周内的尝试概率达到57.1%,而没有任何问题的个体为1.2%,其中40%的综合风险可归因于协同作用(rei =11.51)。值得注意的是,28.3%的尝试发生在否认基线构思的个体中。对于住院患者,只有几乎每天都有自杀意念(HR=8.11, 95% CI, 3.10-21.18)仍然显著(p)。结论:每天都有自杀意念和严重的睡眠障碍协同提高了医护人员的自杀风险。研究结果支持一项综合评估,包括睡眠障碍和同时针对这两个领域的多成分干预。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04635618, NCT04632082。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Suicide Attempts and Psychiatric Hospitalization Among Brazilian Health Care Professionals.","authors":"Rodolfo Furlan Damiano, Marianna de Abreu, Carolina Blaya Dreher, Craig J Bryan, Eurípedes Constantino Miguel, Marcelo Fleck, Gisele Gus Manfro, Giovanni Abrahão Salum","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m15858","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.25m15858","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Background:</b> Health care professionals face elevated suicide risk, yet longitudinal studies during occupational crises are lacking. We investigated factors associated with suicide attempts and psychiatric hospitalizations in health care workers seeking emotional support during COVID-19.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We prospectively evaluated 3,087 Brazilian health care professionals enrolled in a digital mental health trial (May-July 2020). Participants were recruited nationwide from May 2020 to December 2021. From this cohort, 2,815 with complete baseline data comprised the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample. Outcomes were assessed at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Baseline predictors included demographics, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item 9 (suicidal ideation), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System T-scores (depression, anxiety, irritability, sleep), life satisfaction, and burnout. Cox models examined associations; inverse probability weighting addressed attrition. Additive interaction was quantified using relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI).</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In the total sample, 53 participants (1.59%) attempted suicide. In the ITT sample (86% female, mean age 36.5), 46 (1.63%) attempted suicide (64 events), and 60 (2.22%) required psychiatric hospitalization. Nearly every day ideation (hazard ratio [HR]=39.58, 95% CI, 14.03-111.64, <i>P</i><.001), severe sleep disturbances (HR=17.39, 95% CI, 2.05-147.46, <i>P</i>=.009), and male sex (HR=2.08, 95% CI, 1.01-4.26, <i>P</i>=.046) independently predicted attempts. The 24-week attempt probability reached 57.1% for individuals with both ideation and sleep problems versus 1.2% with neither, with 40% of the combined risk attributable to synergistic interaction (RERI=11.51). Notably, 28.3% of attempts occurred among individuals denying baseline ideation. For hospitalizations, only nearly every day ideation remained significant (HR=8.11, 95% CI, 3.10-21.18, <i>P</i><.001). Results remained robust after weighting.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Daily suicidal ideation and severe sleep disturbances synergistically elevate suicide risk among health care professionals. Findings support a comprehensive assessment incorporating sleep disturbances and multicomponent interventions targeting both domains simultaneously.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04635618, NCT04632082.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Precision Medicine for Suicide Prevention: It's Time to Take the Next Step. 预防自杀的精准医学:是时候迈出下一步了。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25com16004
Alejandro Interian, Nathan A Kimbrel, Marianne S Goodman, Joseph I Constans, Steven K Dobscha, Mark Ilgen, Richard R Owen, Susan M Strickland, Brian P Marx
{"title":"Precision Medicine for Suicide Prevention: It's Time to Take the Next Step.","authors":"Alejandro Interian, Nathan A Kimbrel, Marianne S Goodman, Joseph I Constans, Steven K Dobscha, Mark Ilgen, Richard R Owen, Susan M Strickland, Brian P Marx","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25com16004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25com16004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reframing the Discussion on Finasteride and Neuropsychiatric Safety: A Call for Balanced Interpretation. 重新讨论非那雄胺和神经精神安全:呼吁平衡的解释。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25lr16181
Samuel Tringali, Joseph Tringali
{"title":"Reframing the Discussion on Finasteride and Neuropsychiatric Safety: A Call for Balanced Interpretation.","authors":"Samuel Tringali, Joseph Tringali","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25lr16181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25lr16181","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145769807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gestational Exposure to Antidepressants and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Offspring. 妊娠期抗抑郁药物暴露与后代神经发育障碍。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25f16226
Chittaranjan Andrade

Untreated depression may adversely affect pregnancy and offspring outcomes through several mechanisms; on the flip side, antidepressants used to treat depression may cross the placenta and affect the developing fetus and its brain. This article examines the research literature on gestational exposure to antidepressants and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in offspring. Two recent meta-analyses and 3 subsequently published observational studies, including 1 Asian study, are reviewed with especial focus on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite limitations of the literature, some conclusions can reasonably be drawn. In unadjusted analyses, which assist an understanding of real world risks, gestational exposure to antidepressant drugs is associated with an up to doubled risk of ASD and ADHD. However, in adjusted analyses, which assist an understanding of cause-effect relationships but not real world risks, the risks substantially attenuate and may lose statistical significance. The risks also lose statistical significance in analyses that address confounding by indication by comparing antidepressant-exposed and -unexposed pregnancies in women with psychiatric disorders. The likelihood of confounding by parental genes, parental environment, and parental health-related variables is suggested by findings that antidepressants remain significantly associated with NDDs when the exposure period is outside the pregnancy window (such as before or after but not during pregnancy) or when fathers are exposed to antidepressants during pregnancy. Finally, discordant sibling pair analyses suggest that whether or not a child develops an NDD is related to whether or not its sib has an NDD rather than whether or not the child was exposed to an antidepressant in utero. Discussion points are suggested for the shared decision-making process when counseling women about NDD risks associated with gestational exposure to antidepressant drugs. Take-home messages are summarized.

未经治疗的抑郁症可能通过几种机制对妊娠和后代的结局产生不利影响;另一方面,用于治疗抑郁症的抗抑郁药物可能会穿过胎盘,影响发育中的胎儿及其大脑。本文综述了妊娠期抗抑郁药物暴露与后代神经发育障碍(ndd)风险的研究文献。本文回顾了最近的两项荟萃分析和随后发表的3项观察性研究,其中包括一项亚洲研究,特别关注自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)。尽管文献的局限性,一些结论可以合理地得出。未经调整的分析有助于了解现实世界的风险,妊娠期接触抗抑郁药物与ASD和ADHD的风险增加一倍有关。然而,在调整分析中,这有助于理解因果关系,而不是真实世界的风险,风险大大减弱,可能失去统计意义。通过比较精神疾病妇女服用抗抑郁药和未服用抗抑郁药的妊娠来解决混淆的分析中,这些风险也失去了统计学意义。父母基因、父母环境和父母健康相关变量的混杂可能性表明,当暴露期在怀孕窗口之外(如怀孕前后但不在怀孕期间)或父亲在怀孕期间暴露于抗抑郁药物时,抗抑郁药物与ndd仍然显着相关。最后,不一致的兄弟姐妹对分析表明,孩子是否患上NDD与其兄弟姐妹是否患有NDD有关,而不是孩子是否在子宫内接触过抗抑郁药。在咨询妇女关于与妊娠期接触抗抑郁药物相关的NDD风险的共同决策过程中,建议讨论要点。总结了关键信息。
{"title":"Gestational Exposure to Antidepressants and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Offspring.","authors":"Chittaranjan Andrade","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25f16226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25f16226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Untreated depression may adversely affect pregnancy and offspring outcomes through several mechanisms; on the flip side, antidepressants used to treat depression may cross the placenta and affect the developing fetus and its brain. This article examines the research literature on gestational exposure to antidepressants and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in offspring. Two recent meta-analyses and 3 subsequently published observational studies, including 1 Asian study, are reviewed with especial focus on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite limitations of the literature, some conclusions can reasonably be drawn. In unadjusted analyses, which assist an understanding of real world risks, gestational exposure to antidepressant drugs is associated with an up to doubled risk of ASD and ADHD. However, in adjusted analyses, which assist an understanding of cause-effect relationships but not real world risks, the risks substantially attenuate and may lose statistical significance. The risks also lose statistical significance in analyses that address confounding by indication by comparing antidepressant-exposed and -unexposed pregnancies in women with psychiatric disorders. The likelihood of confounding by parental genes, parental environment, and parental health-related variables is suggested by findings that antidepressants remain significantly associated with NDDs when the exposure period is outside the pregnancy window (such as before or after but not during pregnancy) or when fathers are exposed to antidepressants during pregnancy. Finally, discordant sibling pair analyses suggest that whether or not a child develops an NDD is related to whether or not its sib has an NDD rather than whether or not the child was exposed to an antidepressant in utero. Discussion points are suggested for the shared decision-making process when counseling women about NDD risks associated with gestational exposure to antidepressant drugs. Take-home messages are summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145769792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Finasteride-Induced Neuropsychiatric Reactions: No Room for Complacency. 非那雄胺诱导的神经精神反应:没有自满的余地。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25lr16181a
Mayer Brezis
{"title":"Finasteride-Induced Neuropsychiatric Reactions: No Room for Complacency.","authors":"Mayer Brezis","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25lr16181a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25lr16181a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145769730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychosocial Interventions and Functional Recovery in Schizophrenia-Realizing Opportunities Today. 精神分裂症的社会心理干预和功能恢复——今天实现的机会。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.hfrecachi2505
Rajiv Tandon, Deanna M Barch, Robert W Buchanan, Michael F Green, Matcheri S Keshavan, Stephen R Marder, Henry A Nasrallah, Antonio Vita

Functional recovery has emerged as a critical treatment goal in schizophrenia, extending beyond symptom reduction to encompass independent living, vocational and educational attainment, social integration, and overall quality of life. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, many people with schizophrenia continue to experience significant functional impairments driven by persistent symptoms, cognitive deficits, comorbidities, stigma, and adverse social determinants. Psychosocial interventions have been shown to be effective in improving functional outcomes but are not extensively utilized. To address these challenges, a consensus panel of experts in psychiatry and psychology reviewed the evidence base and developed practical recommendations for optimizing functional outcomes.

Panel discussions highlighted 4 domains of functional drivers in schizophrenia: intrinsic, behavioral, comorbid/consequential, and societal/contextual, and evaluated psychosocial interventions with demonstrated benefits relative to these domains. Amidst lingering questions about further refinement and optimal individualization, evidence clearly supports the use of cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive remediation, social skills training, supported employment and housing, and family-focused interventions; likewise, evidence supports the use of psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, mindfulness- and acceptance-based therapies, and lifestyle interventions, such as structured exercise. Implementation remains limited due to workforce shortages, resource constraints, and a lack of integration into routine care.

The panel recommends a comprehensive, patient-centered approach that integrates pharmacological treatment with evidence-based psychosocial strategies, guided by measurement-based care and individualized treatment planning. Validated functional assessment tools and emerging digital therapeutics offer scalable methods to monitor and enhance outcomes. By addressing both intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of disability, clinicians can more effectively support people with schizophrenia in achieving functional recovery and an improved quality of life.

功能恢复已成为精神分裂症的一个关键治疗目标,它不仅包括症状减轻,还包括独立生活、职业和教育成就、社会融合和整体生活质量。尽管药物治疗取得了进展,但许多精神分裂症患者仍因持续症状、认知缺陷、合并症、耻辱感和不利的社会决定因素而继续经历严重的功能障碍。社会心理干预已被证明在改善功能结果方面是有效的,但尚未得到广泛利用。为了应对这些挑战,一个由精神病学和心理学专家组成的共识小组审查了证据基础,并制定了优化功能结果的实用建议。小组讨论强调了精神分裂症的4个功能驱动因素领域:内在、行为、共病/后果和社会/背景,并评估了与这些领域相关的社会心理干预措施的益处。在关于进一步改进和最佳个性化的悬而未决的问题中,证据清楚地支持使用认知行为疗法、认知补救、社会技能培训、支持就业和住房以及以家庭为中心的干预;同样,证据支持使用心理教育、动机访谈、基于正念和接受的疗法,以及生活方式干预,如有组织的锻炼。由于劳动力短缺、资源限制以及未纳入常规护理,实施仍然有限。专家组建议采用一种全面的、以患者为中心的方法,将药物治疗与循证心理社会策略相结合,并以基于测量的护理和个性化的治疗计划为指导。经过验证的功能评估工具和新兴的数字治疗提供了可扩展的方法来监测和增强结果。通过解决残疾的内在和外在驱动因素,临床医生可以更有效地支持精神分裂症患者实现功能恢复和提高生活质量。
{"title":"Psychosocial Interventions and Functional Recovery in Schizophrenia-Realizing Opportunities Today.","authors":"Rajiv Tandon, Deanna M Barch, Robert W Buchanan, Michael F Green, Matcheri S Keshavan, Stephen R Marder, Henry A Nasrallah, Antonio Vita","doi":"10.4088/JCP.hfrecachi2505","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.hfrecachi2505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p></p><p><p>Functional recovery has emerged as a critical treatment goal in schizophrenia, extending beyond symptom reduction to encompass independent living, vocational and educational attainment, social integration, and overall quality of life. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, many people with schizophrenia continue to experience significant functional impairments driven by persistent symptoms, cognitive deficits, comorbidities, stigma, and adverse social determinants. Psychosocial interventions have been shown to be effective in improving functional outcomes but are not extensively utilized. To address these challenges, a consensus panel of experts in psychiatry and psychology reviewed the evidence base and developed practical recommendations for optimizing functional outcomes.</p><p><p>Panel discussions highlighted 4 domains of functional drivers in schizophrenia: intrinsic, behavioral, comorbid/consequential, and societal/contextual, and evaluated psychosocial interventions with demonstrated benefits relative to these domains. Amidst lingering questions about further refinement and optimal individualization, evidence clearly supports the use of cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive remediation, social skills training, supported employment and housing, and family-focused interventions; likewise, evidence supports the use of psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, mindfulness- and acceptance-based therapies, and lifestyle interventions, such as structured exercise. Implementation remains limited due to workforce shortages, resource constraints, and a lack of integration into routine care.</p><p><p>The panel recommends a comprehensive, patient-centered approach that integrates pharmacological treatment with evidence-based psychosocial strategies, guided by measurement-based care and individualized treatment planning. Validated functional assessment tools and emerging digital therapeutics offer scalable methods to monitor and enhance outcomes. By addressing both intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of disability, clinicians can more effectively support people with schizophrenia in achieving functional recovery and an improved quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145769802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Valproic Acid Use Trends, Patterns, and Predictors in Females of Reproductive Age in the United States. 美国育龄女性丙戊酸使用趋势、模式和预测因素
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16009
Nina Vadiei, Julianne A Mercer, Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Grace C Lee

Objective: To provide an up-to-date evaluation of valproic acid (VPA) use trends, patterns, and predictors in females of reproductive age in ambulatory care settings in the US.

Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using 2017 through 2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data to examine trends in VPA use. Prescription rates were calculated per 1,000 prescription events with 95% confidence intervals. VPA prescriptions were stratified by clinical indication and recipient group (females aged 12-49 years, females aged ≥50 years, and males aged 12-49 years). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of VPA use among females aged 12-49 years and all females with comorbid bipolar disorder, headache, or seizure conditions.

Results: The cumulative total of VPA prescription events across the 2017-2022 study period was 29,754,849 (95% CI, 23,843,243-35,666,455). Of these, 5,442,682 (95% CI, 2,879,340-8,006,024) were issued to females aged 12-49 years (18.3% of all VPA prescriptions). From 2017 to 2022, VPA prescribing decreased by nearly 50% (P =.037). Most VPA prescriptions filled by females aged 12-49 years were for migraine or other headache syndromes (27.2%), followed by bipolar disorder (24.6%) and convulsions or epilepsy (20.7%). Of the estimated 153,120 females aged 12-49 years who filled a prescription for VPA between 2017-2022, 85.9% were not using contraception.

Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 5 VPA prescriptions between 2017 to 2022 were prescribed to females of reproductive age. VPA was most commonly used for the treatment of migraine or other headache syndrome, followed by bipolar disorder and convulsive disorder. Only 14.1% of females of reproductive age using VPA were also using contraception. Interventional studies aimed at reducing VPA use in females of reproductive age are needed.

目的:提供最新的评估丙戊酸(VPA)的使用趋势,模式和预测因素在美国的门诊护理设置育龄妇女。方法:使用2017年至2022年医疗支出小组调查数据进行回顾性横断面研究,以检查VPA使用趋势。处方率以每1000个处方事件计算,置信区间为95%。按临床适应证和接受人群(女性12-49岁、女性≥50岁、男性12-49岁)对VPA处方进行分层。多变量logistic回归用于确定12-49岁女性和所有合并双相情感障碍、头痛或癫痫发作的女性使用VPA的预测因素。结果:2017-2022年研究期间VPA处方事件的累计总数为29,754,849 (95% CI, 23,843,243-35,666,455)。其中,5,442,682 (95% CI, 2,879,340-8,006,024)发给了12-49岁的女性(占所有VPA处方的18.3%)。从2017年到2022年,VPA处方减少了近50% (P = 0.037)。12-49岁女性开具的VPA处方主要用于偏头痛或其他头痛综合征(27.2%),其次是双相情感障碍(24.6%)和惊厥或癫痫(20.7%)。在2017-2022年期间,估计有153120名12-49岁的女性服用了VPA处方,其中85.9%没有使用避孕措施。结论:2017 - 2022年间,约有1 / 5的VPA处方是给育龄女性开的。VPA最常用于治疗偏头痛或其他头痛综合征,其次是双相情感障碍和惊厥障碍。使用VPA的育龄女性中仅有14.1%同时采取了避孕措施。需要进行旨在减少育龄妇女VPA使用的介入性研究。
{"title":"Valproic Acid Use Trends, Patterns, and Predictors in Females of Reproductive Age in the United States.","authors":"Nina Vadiei, Julianne A Mercer, Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Grace C Lee","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> To provide an up-to-date evaluation of valproic acid (VPA) use trends, patterns, and predictors in females of reproductive age in ambulatory care settings in the US.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using 2017 through 2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data to examine trends in VPA use. Prescription rates were calculated per 1,000 prescription events with 95% confidence intervals. VPA prescriptions were stratified by clinical indication and recipient group (females aged 12-49 years, females aged ≥50 years, and males aged 12-49 years). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of VPA use among females aged 12-49 years and all females with comorbid bipolar disorder, headache, or seizure conditions.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The cumulative total of VPA prescription events across the 2017-2022 study period was 29,754,849 (95% CI, 23,843,243-35,666,455). Of these, 5,442,682 (95% CI, 2,879,340-8,006,024) were issued to females aged 12-49 years (18.3% of all VPA prescriptions). From 2017 to 2022, VPA prescribing decreased by nearly 50% (<i>P</i> =.037). Most VPA prescriptions filled by females aged 12-49 years were for migraine or other headache syndromes (27.2%), followed by bipolar disorder (24.6%) and convulsions or epilepsy (20.7%). Of the estimated 153,120 females aged 12-49 years who filled a prescription for VPA between 2017-2022, 85.9% were not using contraception.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Approximately 1 in 5 VPA prescriptions between 2017 to 2022 were prescribed to females of reproductive age. VPA was most commonly used for the treatment of migraine or other headache syndrome, followed by bipolar disorder and convulsive disorder. Only 14.1% of females of reproductive age using VPA were also using contraception. Interventional studies aimed at reducing VPA use in females of reproductive age are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obstetric Outcomes With Second-Generation Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics. 第二代长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药的产科预后。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16033
Farah Khorassani, Gemma Espejo, Kelly C Lee

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate obstetric outcomes in pregnant women who received second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) compared to a control group who received second-generation oral antipsychotics.

Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing a global cohort of 148 health care organizations grouped into a network within the TriNetX database. Pregnant patients of any trimester were grouped into 2 cohorts: (1) exposure to long-acting aripiprazole, risperidone, paliperidone, or olanzapine (n=2,082) and (2) exposure to the corresponding oral formulations (n=31,376) and propensity matched. The primary outcome was the occurrence of one of the following obstetric complications: gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, or a newly diagnosed hypertensive disorder. Cesarean section rates were also assessed.

Results: After propensity matching, each cohort yielded 2,025 patients. No intergroup differences were observed in the composite primary end point, performed postmatching (odds ratio 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.18; P=.61). No difference in rates of cesarean section was observed.

Conclusion: Similar rates of gestational diabetes, eclampsia, preeclampsia, and maternal hypertensive disorders were observed in women receiving long-acting injectable and oral second-generation antipsychotics.

目的:本研究的目的是评估接受第二代长效注射抗精神病药物(LAIAs)的孕妇与接受第二代口服抗精神病药物的对照组的产科结局。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,利用全球148个卫生保健组织在TriNetX数据库中分组成一个网络。任何妊娠期的孕妇被分为2组:(1)暴露于长效阿立哌唑、利培酮、帕利哌酮或奥氮平(n= 2082)和(2)暴露于相应的口服制剂(n= 31376)并倾向匹配。主要结局是发生以下产科并发症之一:妊娠糖尿病、先兆子痫、子痫或新诊断的高血压疾病。同时评估剖宫产率。结果:倾向匹配后,每个队列产生2025例患者。经后匹配后,在综合主要终点未观察到组间差异(优势比0.95;95% CI, 0.76-1.18; P= 0.61)。剖宫产率无差异。结论:服用长效注射和口服第二代抗精神病药物的妇女,妊娠期糖尿病、子痫、子痫前期和孕产妇高血压疾病的发生率相似。
{"title":"Obstetric Outcomes With Second-Generation Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics.","authors":"Farah Khorassani, Gemma Espejo, Kelly C Lee","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study is to evaluate obstetric outcomes in pregnant women who received second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) compared to a control group who received second-generation oral antipsychotics.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective study utilizing a global cohort of 148 health care organizations grouped into a network within the TriNetX database. Pregnant patients of any trimester were grouped into 2 cohorts: (1) exposure to long-acting aripiprazole, risperidone, paliperidone, or olanzapine (n=2,082) and (2) exposure to the corresponding oral formulations (n=31,376) and propensity matched. The primary outcome was the occurrence of one of the following obstetric complications: gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, or a newly diagnosed hypertensive disorder. Cesarean section rates were also assessed.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> After propensity matching, each cohort yielded 2,025 patients. No intergroup differences were observed in the composite primary end point, performed postmatching (odds ratio 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76-1.18; <i>P</i>=.61). No difference in rates of cesarean section was observed.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Similar rates of gestational diabetes, eclampsia, preeclampsia, and maternal hypertensive disorders were observed in women receiving long-acting injectable and oral second-generation antipsychotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1