Journal of Clinical Psychiatry最新文献

Objective: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL), a long-acting injectable antipsychotic, has 2 initiation options: 1-day (AL NanoCrystal Dispersion [AL_NCD] injection plus 30 mg oral aripiprazole on day 1 only) and 21-day (15 mg oral aripiprazole for 21 days). This post hoc analysis assessed the safety and tolerability of both initiation approaches.

Methods: We analyzed data from the first 4 weeks of 2 AL studies, one using the 1-day initiation regimen (conducted between November 2017 and March 2019) and the other using the 21-day initiation regimen (conducted between December 2011 and March 2014). Outcomes of interest during the matched 4-week period included the likelihood of adverse events (AEs), including those associated with discontinuation, rated as serious, or of special interest (injection site reactions [ISRs] and akathisia).

Results: The 1-day (n = 99) and 21-day (n = 415) initiation regimens had comparable rates of AEs (57.6% and 52.0%, respectively; most were mild), serious AEs (2.0% and 1.4%), and AEs leading to discontinuation (4.0% and 3.1%). The incidence of ISRs was 11.1% after the AL_NCD injection (day 1) in the 1-day initiation regimen. ISR rates for the AL starting doses were 9.2% for the 1-day regimen (AL 1064 mg on day 8) and 3.9% for the 21-day regimen (AL 441 mg/882 mg on day 1). Rates of akathisia were 9.1% and 11.1% for the 1-day and 21-day regimens, respectively. One patient discontinued because of an ISR in the 21-day study, and 2 patients in the 21-day study discontinued because of akathisia. Mean changes from baseline in week 4 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores were -17.4 (1-day) and -19.5 (21-day).

Conclusions: Four-week safety and tolerability were similar following the initiation of AL with either the 1-day or 21-day regimen, supporting the utility of both initiation regimens. Engaging patients in discussions regarding options for initiating AL may help facilitate shared decision-making and personalization of treatment for patients with schizophrenia.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03345979 and NCT01469039.

Objectives: Our first objective was to compare the prevalence of symptomatic disorders (formerly Axis I disorders) over 24 years of prospective follow-up among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other personality disordered comparison subjects as well as recovered vs nonrecovered borderline patients. Our second objective was to assess the relationship between the absence of 5 major classes of symptomatic disorders over time and the likelihood of concurrent recovery among borderline patients.

Methods: The McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD) is a naturalistic prospective follow-up study of 362 inpatients assessed at 12 contiguous 2-year follow-up waves. Symptomatic disorders were assessed at each follow-up using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I Disorders. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess all outcomes. Data were collected from June 1992 to December 2018.

Results: Patients with BPD had significantly higher rates of all 5 types of disorders studied than comparison subjects. However, the prevalence of these disorders declined significantly over time at similar rates for both study groups. This finding was similar for recovered and nonrecovered borderline patients. When the absence of these types of comorbid disorders was used to predict recovery status, substance use disorders were a substantially stronger predictor of recovery than the other 4 classes of disorders (relative risk ratio: 2.53, P < .001).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that symptomatic disorders co occur less commonly with BPD over time, particularly for recovered borderline patients. They also suggest that the absence of substance use disorders is the strongest predictor of achieving recovery from BPD.

Abstract.

Objective: The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) is a widely recognized tool with exceptional reliability and validity in evaluating and diagnosing PTSD. This study aimed to determine the predictive values of CAPS-5 assessed early postinjury for subsequent development of PTSD during a 2-year follow-up period.

Methods: Patients with moderate to severe physical injuries were recruited from a trauma center at a university hospital in South Korea between June 2015 and January 2021. At baseline, 1,142 patients underwent evaluations using CAPS-5 for the diagnosis of acute stress disorder (ASD) along with total scores. They were followed up for PTSD using the CAPS-5 evaluations at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-baseline. Area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) analyses were conducted to identify predictive values of the CAPS-5 for later PTSD development.

Results: CAPS-5 diagnosis of ASD at baseline displayed fair to failed performance (AUROCs: 0.555-0.722) for predicting follow-up PTSD. However, CAPS-5 scores of ≥15 exhibited good to fair predictive accuracy (AUROCs: 0.767-0.854) for later PTSD development. Notably, for patients with intentional injuries or a history of previous trauma, a higher CAPS-5 score of ≥16 showed improved predictive accuracy.

Conclusion: A CAPS-5 score of ≥15 would be an effective and practical cutoff for early prediction of PTSD following physical injuries. In cases of intentional injuries or a documented trauma history, a cutoff of ≥16 may offer enhanced predictive precision. Future research in diverse settings and populations is needed to confirm the generalizability of our findings.

Abstract.

Introduction: Sleep disturbances and elevated stress levels are commonly reported among individuals seeking treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). However, it remains unclear whether the relationship between sleep and stress differs based on the primary substance of use or if there are commonalities across different substances. This study aimed to investigate the association between sleep disturbances and perceived stress among individuals in SUD treatment and examine whether primary substance influences this relationship.

Method: A sample of 4,201 individuals from 59 SUD treatment programs completed assessments including the Insomnia Severity Index and Perceived Stress Scale in 2021. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between sleep and stress across different primary substances during treatment.

Results: The results demonstrated that higher stress was associated with more severe insomnia, and vice versa, both at treatment intake and over the course of treatment, regardless of primary substance. Persons using heroin/ fentanyl evidenced a stronger association of sleep on stress, and persons using cocaine evidenced a stronger relationship of stress on sleep.

Discussion: The findings suggest that sleep/stress associations are ubiquitous across different classes of drugs, although sleep might have more influence on stress in persons primarily using heroin/ fentanyl, and stress might have more influence on sleep in persons primarily using cocaine, relative to other substances. Interventions targeting either sleep or stress could have positive effects on SUD outcomes, but further research is needed to investigate the underlying neurobiological mechanisms and inform the development of effective interventions for sleep and stress in SUD populations.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) refers to the difficulty in achieving and maintaining a degree of penile erection that suffices for satisfactory sexual activity. ED is multifactorial in origin; its prevalence therefore varies with the population studied. In the general population, ED is present in 18-52% of men in younger to older age groups and in 43-76% of men with different medical conditions. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor drugs are gold standard treatments for ED. However, because many lifestyle disorders predispose to ED and because aerobic exercise is beneficial for these lifestyle disorders, aerobic exercise may be a possible intervention for ED. In this context, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis identified 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; pooled N = 1,147) of aerobic exercise vs nonexercising control conditions for the treatment of ED. These RCTs had been conducted in men with different medical and surgical conditions, commonly obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. The exercise interventions were varied but mostly involved 30-60 minutes sessions of activity, 3-5 times a week, for a median duration of 6 months. Advice for diet and weight loss was also commonly provided. The meta analysis found that aerobic exercise was significantly superior to nonexercising control conditions, with greater improvement in erectile functioning observed in subjects with greater baseline impairment. Limitations of the findings were that subjects could not be blinded to the nature of the intervention and that the magnitude of benefit with exercise, although statistically significant, fell below thresholds suggested for clinical significance. Aerobic exercise might therefore be more useful for the primary prevention of ED, for which preliminary evidence already exists. Exercise can also be recommended, along with other lifestyle guidance, to improve sexual functioning in both men and women and to improve health across a range of domains.

Background: This study explored the characteristics of people who die by suicide, comparing those who had depression with those who did not.

Methods: Clinical data were collected through a postmortem proxy-based semistructured interview (psychological autopsy). Postmortem toxicological analysis provides data on the presence of substances or drugs in the blood of suicides. Participants were adults who died by suicide in the province of Seville, Spain, during 2006-2016. The main independent variables were previous diagnosis, postmortem diagnosis, prescribed treatment, and treatment found in blood. The primary outcome was the postmortem diagnosis of depression, after which the sample was divided into 2 groups according to DSM IV criteria to the presence or absence of major depressive episode (MDE).

Results: Our sample is composed of 313 people, of which 200 (63.9%) had a diagnosis of MDE according to the psychological autopsy. Predeath diagnosis of depression was more frequent in MDE suicides than in non-MDE suicides (18.6% vs 3.5%, respectively; Χ² = 23.420; df = 9; P = .005) and had more access to mental health treatment previous to death (67.7% vs 35.6%, respectively; Χ² = 27.572; df = 1; P < .001). Antidepressants were prescribed in 21.5% of the MDE suicides, but only 8.5% of them were taking them at the time of death according to the toxicology exam.

Conclusions: The underdiagnosis of depression in people who die by suicide is striking, as is the undertreatment. Further efforts must be made to train primary care physicians in the proper identification of persons at risk of suicide, as they are one of the main gatekeepers in the fight for suicide prevention.

Objective: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and eating disorders (EDs) both cause significant distress and co-occur at rates higher than expected, signifying potential overlapping regulatory mechanisms between both disorders. More specifically, both disorders involve emotion regulation deficits, suggesting they may share specific maladaptive regulatory components. The present study sought to examine the predictive role of emotion dysregulation within the comorbidity between EDs and BPD.

Methods: A sample of psychiatric outpatients (N = 872) collected from a longitudinal study spanning the mid-1990s to 2015 completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV for Axis I Disorders as well as a measure of emotion regulation strategies, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, in order to assess overall functioning.

Results: In a regression analysis, BPD was significantly predicted by emotion regulation deficits and was strongly related to categories of emotion dysregulation. EDs were not significantly predicted by emotion regulation deficits but did predict BPD diagnoses (B = -0.14, P < .001). Overall, BPD demonstrated strong relationships to emotion regulation deficits.

Conclusions: Results indicate that targeted treatment focusing on emotion regulation deficits may be particularly indicated with co-occurring BPD and ED diagnoses.

Women with epilepsy (WWE) are usually advised antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment even during pregnancy. It is therefore important to know what the major congenital malformation (MCM) risks might be with untreated epilepsy, and with first-trimester exposure to different AEDs in monotherapy. This article reviews recent findings from a large multinational registry, a large multinational population based study, and a large meta-analysis. In summary, data from the meta-analysis suggest that the MCM rate is 2%-3% in women without epilepsy and about 3% in WWE who were unexposed to AEDs during pregnancy. Data from the meta analysis also suggest that the MCM rate is approximately population level at 2.6%-3.5% with levetiracetam and lamotrigine and that it is about 4%-5% with carbamazepine, 2.8%-4.8% with oxcarbazepine, about 4% with topiramate, about 5%-7% with phenytoin, about 6%-9% with phenobarbital, and nearly 10% with valproate. The MCM risk with valproate is significantly higher than that with other AEDs (including topiramate and phenobarbital) that significantly increase the risk. Data from the registry suggest that risks are dose-dependent with valproate, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine and that the risk with valproate may be as high as 25% at doses >1,450 mg/d. Valproate is also associated with a wide range of MCMs. Data from the population-based study were generally confirmatory. Strengths and limitations of the studies are considered. The findings of these studies encourage the consideration of levetiracetam or lamotrigine monotherapy for WWE who are pregnant and strongly discourage the consideration of the older AEDs, especially phenytoin and phenobarbitone, and most especially valproate. These considerations also apply to all WWE of childbearing age because it may not be easy to change AEDs when pregnancy is planned and because pregnancy is often unplanned.

Objectives: Bipolar disorder (BD) is highly heritable and associated with increased rates of metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, little is known about MetS in offspring of parents with BD. We therefore examined this topic in the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study cohort.

Methods: Participants included 199 parents (n = 116 BD, diagnosed using DSM-IV; n = 83 non-BD) and 330 offspring (mean age 19.9 ± 5.3 years), including 198 high-risk offspring of parents with BD (n = 80 affected with a mood disorder) and 132 control offspring. We defined MetS and its components using International Diabetes Federation (IDF) guidelines (primary) and National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines (secondary). Multivariable analyses controlled for age and socioeconomic status in offspring. Sensitivity analyses controlled for psychotropic medications.

Results: There was higher prevalence of MetS in parents with BD as compared to controls. NCEP-defined MetS was significantly more prevalent among affected high-risk offspring (16.3%) and controls (15.2%) vs unaffected high-risk offspring (6.0%; χ² = 6.54, P = .04). There was greater mean number of MetS components (IDF: 1.7 ± 1.1; NCEP: 1.4 ± 1.0) among affected high-risk offspring vs unaffected high-risk offspring (IDF: 1.2 ± 1.0; NCEP: 1.0 ± 1.0) and controls (IDF: 1.3 ± 1.2; NCEP: 1.1 ± 1.1; IDF: H[2] = 10.26, P = .006; NCEP: H[2] = 9.18, P = .01). Most findings became nonsignificant in multivariable analyses. Some between-group results became nonsignificant after controlling for second-generation antipsychotics.

Conclusions: This preliminary study found increased risk of MetS among affected high-risk offspring, which may be attributable to socioeconomic status. Prospective studies may determine timing of MetS onset in relation to mood disorder onset, and the role of socioeconomic status in moderating this association.