首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
Outcomes and Practice Patterns of Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics Among Patients With Bipolar I Disorder in the United States: A Hospital Database Analysis. 美国双相I型患者长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药的疗效和实践模式:一项医院数据库分析
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16154
Sigal Kaplan, Zenobia Dotiwala, Julian Casciano, Mark Suett, Arti Phatak, Ying Zhang, Lynda Krasenbaum, Martha Sajatovic

Objective: To compare rehospitalization outcomes and medication practice patterns between long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) and oral antipsychotics (OAs) in US patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study using the Premier Hospital database (October 2020-September 2023) grouped adults (aged ≥18 years) hospitalized with BD-I by discharge medication: OA, LAI, or second-generation LAI (SG LAI). LAI and SG LAI patients were propensity score matched (1:4) to OA patients. Rehospitalization rates and risk (BD-I-related and all-cause) within 30, 60, and 90 days were assessed. Medication continuation vs switching at rehospitalization was also analyzed.

Results: Among 98,088 eligible patients, 78.1% were in the OA and 2.4% in the LAI group. BD-I-related rehospitalization rates were lower for LAI users at 30 (3.9% vs 5.0%, P=.033) and 60 days (5.9% vs 7.2%, P=.030) vs OAs. SG LAI users showed reductions in rehospitalizations at 30 (3.6% vs 5.4%; P=.010), 60 (5.2% vs 7.5%; P=.008), and 90 (6.8% vs 9.1%; P=.015) days. Risk of first BD-I rehospitalization within 30-90 days was reduced for LAI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.784-0.856) and SG LAI (HR: 0.653-0.742) groups vs OAs.

Conclusions: LAIs, especially SG formulations, are associated with reduced rehospitalization in BD-I compared to OAs, supporting their broader use to improve adherence and reduce readmissions.

目的:比较长效注射抗精神病药物(LAIs)和口服抗精神病药物(OAs)在美国双相I型障碍(BD-I)患者再住院结局和用药实践模式。方法:该回顾性队列研究使用Premier Hospital数据库(2020年10月- 2023年9月),根据出院药物:OA、LAI或第二代LAI (SG LAI)对BD-I住院的成人(年龄≥18岁)进行分组。LAI和SG LAI患者倾向评分与OA患者匹配(1:4)。评估30,60和90天内的再住院率和风险(bd - i相关和全因)。再次住院时继续用药与切换用药也进行了分析。结果:98088例符合条件的患者中,78.1%为OA组,2.4%为LAI组。与oa相比,LAI使用者在30天(3.9% vs 5.0%, P= 0.033)和60天(5.9% vs 7.2%, P= 0.030)与bd - i相关的再住院率较低。SG LAI使用者的再住院率分别为30天(3.6% vs 5.4%; P= 0.010)、60天(5.2% vs 7.5%; P= 0.008)和90天(6.8% vs 9.1%; P= 0.015)。与oa组相比,LAI组30-90天内首次BD-I再住院的风险降低(风险比[HR]: 0.784-0.856), SG LAI组(风险比:0.653-0.742)。结论:与oa相比,LAIs,尤其是SG制剂,与BD-I的再住院率降低有关,支持其更广泛的应用,以提高依从性和减少再入院率。
{"title":"Outcomes and Practice Patterns of Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics Among Patients With Bipolar I Disorder in the United States: A Hospital Database Analysis.","authors":"Sigal Kaplan, Zenobia Dotiwala, Julian Casciano, Mark Suett, Arti Phatak, Ying Zhang, Lynda Krasenbaum, Martha Sajatovic","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16154","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.25m16154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare rehospitalization outcomes and medication practice patterns between long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) and oral antipsychotics (OAs) in US patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I).</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study using the Premier Hospital database (October 2020-September 2023) grouped adults (aged ≥18 years) hospitalized with BD-I by discharge medication: OA, LAI, or second-generation LAI (SG LAI). LAI and SG LAI patients were propensity score matched (1:4) to OA patients. Rehospitalization rates and risk (BD-I-related and all-cause) within 30, 60, and 90 days were assessed. Medication continuation vs switching at rehospitalization was also analyzed.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Among 98,088 eligible patients, 78.1% were in the OA and 2.4% in the LAI group. BD-I-related rehospitalization rates were lower for LAI users at 30 (3.9% vs 5.0%, <i>P</i>=.033) and 60 days (5.9% vs 7.2%, <i>P</i>=.030) vs OAs. SG LAI users showed reductions in rehospitalizations at 30 (3.6% vs 5.4%; <i>P</i>=.010), 60 (5.2% vs 7.5%; <i>P</i>=.008), and 90 (6.8% vs 9.1%; <i>P</i>=.015) days. Risk of first BD-I rehospitalization within 30-90 days was reduced for LAI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.784-0.856) and SG LAI (HR: 0.653-0.742) groups vs OAs.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> LAIs, especially SG formulations, are associated with reduced rehospitalization in BD-I compared to OAs, supporting their broader use to improve adherence and reduce readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147357411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benzodiazepines as Special Risk Medications. 苯二氮卓类药物作为特殊风险药物。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.26com16314
Edward K Silberman
{"title":"Benzodiazepines as Special Risk Medications.","authors":"Edward K Silberman","doi":"10.4088/JCP.26com16314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.26com16314","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effects of Extended Cannabis Abstinence in Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Cannabis Use Disorder. 延长大麻戒断对合并创伤后应激障碍和大麻使用障碍的影响。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16099
Justyne D Rodas, Maryam Sorkhou, Stefan Kloiber, Tony P George, Ahmed N Hassan

Objective: This preliminary open-label study examined whether 12 weeks of cannabis abstinence was associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom improvement in people with comorbid PTSD and cannabis use disorder (CUD) (N=21).

Methods: Participants received progressive contingency reinforcement payments for successful abstinence at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Abstinence was defined as a 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) level ≤50 ng/mL with no self-reported cannabis use. PTSD symptoms were evaluated using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), capturing total severity, symptom count, and cluster scores. Data were collected from January 2022 to April 2025.

Results: Participants who achieved abstinence (n=11) reported significantly greater reductions in total PTSD symptom severity and symptom count relative to those who did not (n=10). CAPS-5 total scores decreased from 36.2 to 10.5 among abstainers versus 34.6 to 21.8 among nonabstainers (P=.001). Time-by-group interactions revealed more pronounced improvements in avoidance, negative mood and cognition, and hyperarousal among abstainers. Reexperiencing symptoms improved across both groups over time, with no significant difference by abstinence status.

Conclusions: Sustained cannabis abstinence was associated with significant reductions in PTSD symptom severity and frequency over 12 weeks. While not definitive, the results raise questions about the assumption that long-term cannabis use improves symptoms or functioning in PTSD. The data instead suggest that continued cannabis use could limit recovery in some domains. This underscores the need to routinely assess cannabis use during PTSD treatment and to educate patients on the potential consequences of continued use. Larger randomized trials are warranted to replicate and extend these findings and to investigate mechanisms through which abstinence may relate to symptom changes in PTSD with CUD.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05162651.

目的:这项初步的开放标签研究探讨了12周的大麻戒断是否与PTSD合并大麻使用障碍(CUD)患者创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状改善有关(N=21)。方法:参与者在第4周、第8周和第12周获得成功戒断的渐进偶然性强化奖励。戒断被定义为11-no -9-羧基四氢大麻酚(THC-COOH)水平≤50 ng/mL且没有自我报告使用大麻。使用DSM-5 (CAPS-5)临床应用PTSD量表评估PTSD症状,捕获总严重程度、症状计数和聚类得分。数据收集时间为2022年1月至2025年4月。结果:实现戒断的参与者(n=11)与未实现戒断的参与者(n=10)相比,在创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度和症状计数上有显著更大的减少。不饮酒者的CAPS-5总分从36.2降至10.5,而不饮酒者的CAPS-5总分从34.6降至21.8 (P=.001)。按时间分组的互动显示,戒酒者在回避、消极情绪和认知以及过度觉醒方面有更明显的改善。随着时间的推移,两组的症状都有所改善,戒断状态没有显著差异。结论:持续的大麻戒断与PTSD症状严重程度和频率在12周内的显著降低有关。虽然不是决定性的,但结果对长期使用大麻能改善PTSD症状或功能的假设提出了质疑。相反,数据表明,继续使用大麻可能会限制某些领域的恢复。这强调了在创伤后应激障碍治疗期间定期评估大麻使用情况的必要性,并教育患者继续使用大麻的潜在后果。需要更大规模的随机试验来复制和扩展这些发现,并研究禁欲与PTSD合并CUD的症状变化相关的机制。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05162651。
{"title":"The Effects of Extended Cannabis Abstinence in Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Cannabis Use Disorder.","authors":"Justyne D Rodas, Maryam Sorkhou, Stefan Kloiber, Tony P George, Ahmed N Hassan","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This preliminary open-label study examined whether 12 weeks of cannabis abstinence was associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom improvement in people with comorbid PTSD and cannabis use disorder (CUD) (N=21).</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Participants received progressive contingency reinforcement payments for successful abstinence at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Abstinence was defined as a 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) level ≤50 ng/mL with no self-reported cannabis use. PTSD symptoms were evaluated using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for <i>DSM-5</i> (CAPS-5), capturing total severity, symptom count, and cluster scores. Data were collected from January 2022 to April 2025.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Participants who achieved abstinence (n=11) reported significantly greater reductions in total PTSD symptom severity and symptom count relative to those who did not (n=10). CAPS-5 total scores decreased from 36.2 to 10.5 among abstainers versus 34.6 to 21.8 among nonabstainers (<i>P</i>=.001). Time-by-group interactions revealed more pronounced improvements in avoidance, negative mood and cognition, and hyperarousal among abstainers. Reexperiencing symptoms improved across both groups over time, with no significant difference by abstinence status.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Sustained cannabis abstinence was associated with significant reductions in PTSD symptom severity and frequency over 12 weeks. While not definitive, the results raise questions about the assumption that long-term cannabis use improves symptoms or functioning in PTSD. The data instead suggest that continued cannabis use could limit recovery in some domains. This underscores the need to routinely assess cannabis use during PTSD treatment and to educate patients on the potential consequences of continued use. Larger randomized trials are warranted to replicate and extend these findings and to investigate mechanisms through which abstinence may relate to symptom changes in PTSD with CUD.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05162651.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Benzodiazepine Prescribing to Adults in the United States: Results From the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. 美国成人苯二氮卓类药物处方趋势:来自医疗支出小组调查的结果。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16125
Mark Olfson, Chandler McClellan, Samuel H Zuvekas, Carlos Blanco

Objective: This study describes recent trends in benzodiazepine prescribing to US adults and characterizes patients who receive benzodiazepines and other central nervous system (CNS) depressants.

Method: This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed benzodiazepine use by adults (ages ≥18 years) in the 2018-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, which are nationally representative surveys of the civilian noninstitutionalized population. We examined sex-adjusted annual trends (2018-2022) in benzodiazepine use by age group (ages 18-35, 36-55, and ≥56 years) and pooled marginal differences by age group in any benzodiazepine use and in benzodiazepine use and other CNS-depressant medications, stratified by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: The analysis involved 104,231 participants. Between 2018 and 2022, annual benzodiazepine use by US adults decreased from 4.7% to 3.4%. This included a greater decrease for adults ages ≥56 years (7.2% to 4.7%) than for those ages 36-55 years (4.4% to 3.4%) or 18-35 years (2.1% to 1.8%). Approximately 41.6% adults treated with benzodiazepines also received other CNS-depressant medications in the same year including a higher percentage aged 36-55 years (44.6%) or ≥56 years (42.9%) than 18-35 years (30.0%). Most benzodiazepine-treated adults with fair or poor general health (72.0%) or with serious psychological distress (62.9%) also received other CNS-depressant medications.

Conclusions: Benzodiazepine treatment decreased among US adults between 2018 and 2022, with a greater decline among adults ≥56 years than those 36-55 or 18-35 years. Prescription of benzodiazepines to adults who also received other CNS depressants was common, especially among adults in fair or poor general health or with serious psychological distress.

目的:本研究描述了美国成年人苯二氮卓类药物处方的最新趋势,并描述了服用苯二氮卓类药物和其他中枢神经系统(CNS)抑制剂的患者的特征。方法:本重复横断面研究分析了2018-2022年医疗支出小组调查中成年人(年龄≥18岁)苯二氮卓类药物的使用情况,该调查是全国代表性的非机构平民人口调查。我们检查了按年龄组(18-35岁、36-55岁和≥56岁)调整性别的苯二氮卓类药物使用的年度趋势(2018-2022年),并汇总了按社会人口统计学和临床特征分层的各年龄组苯二氮卓类药物使用以及苯二氮卓类药物和其他中枢神经系统抑制剂药物使用的边际差异。结果:该分析涉及104,231名参与者。2018年至2022年期间,美国成年人苯二氮卓类药物的年使用量从4.7%降至3.4%。其中,≥56岁的成年人(7.2% - 4.7%)比36-55岁(4.4% - 3.4%)或18-35岁(2.1% - 1.8%)的下降幅度更大。大约41.6%接受苯二氮卓类药物治疗的成年人在同一年也接受了其他中枢神经系统抑制剂药物,其中36-55岁(44.6%)或≥56岁(42.9%)的比例高于18-35岁(30.0%)。大多数接受苯二氮卓类药物治疗的一般健康状况一般或较差的成年人(72.0%)或有严重心理困扰的成年人(62.9%)还接受其他中枢神经系统抑制剂药物治疗。结论:2018年至2022年间,苯二氮卓类药物在美国成年人中的使用率有所下降,年龄≥56岁的成年人的使用率下降幅度大于36-55岁或18-35岁的成年人。在接受其他中枢神经系统抑制剂的成年人中,苯二氮卓类药物的处方是常见的,特别是在一般健康状况或较差或有严重心理困扰的成年人中。
{"title":"Trends in Benzodiazepine Prescribing to Adults in the United States: Results From the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.","authors":"Mark Olfson, Chandler McClellan, Samuel H Zuvekas, Carlos Blanco","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study describes recent trends in benzodiazepine prescribing to US adults and characterizes patients who receive benzodiazepines and other central nervous system (CNS) depressants.</p><p><p><b>Method:</b> This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed benzodiazepine use by adults (ages ≥18 years) in the 2018-2022 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, which are nationally representative surveys of the civilian noninstitutionalized population. We examined sex-adjusted annual trends (2018-2022) in benzodiazepine use by age group (ages 18-35, 36-55, and ≥56 years) and pooled marginal differences by age group in any benzodiazepine use and in benzodiazepine use and other CNS-depressant medications, stratified by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The analysis involved 104,231 participants. Between 2018 and 2022, annual benzodiazepine use by US adults decreased from 4.7% to 3.4%. This included a greater decrease for adults ages ≥56 years (7.2% to 4.7%) than for those ages 36-55 years (4.4% to 3.4%) or 18-35 years (2.1% to 1.8%). Approximately 41.6% adults treated with benzodiazepines also received other CNS-depressant medications in the same year including a higher percentage aged 36-55 years (44.6%) or ≥56 years (42.9%) than 18-35 years (30.0%). Most benzodiazepine-treated adults with fair or poor general health (72.0%) or with serious psychological distress (62.9%) also received other CNS-depressant medications.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Benzodiazepine treatment decreased among US adults between 2018 and 2022, with a greater decline among adults ≥56 years than those 36-55 or 18-35 years. Prescription of benzodiazepines to adults who also received other CNS depressants was common, especially among adults in fair or poor general health or with serious psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postmarketing Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A 10-Year MAUDE Database Analysis of Adverse Events and Technological Advancements. 经颅磁刺激的上市后安全性:不良事件和技术进步的10年MAUDE数据库分析。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-11 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16155
Ali Imam Awan, Nida Waheed, Rida Zahra, Allah Dad, Deepan Singh

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an FDA-cleared neuromodulation technique with expanding clinical applications beyond major depressive disorder. Despite increasing utilization, there has been no published, device-agnostic analysis of TMS-related adverse events (AEs) using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Objective: To characterize the real-world safety profile of TMS devices based on MAUDE-reported AEs, including symptom patterns, manufacturer-level variations, device issues, and reporting delays, while contextualizing findings through a review of technological advancements in TMS.

Methods: All reports under device code OBP were extracted from MAUDE through April 2025. After deduplication, 200 unique reports were analyzed descriptively. A focused literature review was also conducted to trace safety and innovation trends in TMS device development.

Results: Of 200 reports, 94.7% involved injury, 4.1% malfunction, and 1.2% death. Common symptoms included anxiety (8.2%), neurocognitive changes (8.0%), seizures (6.9%), headache (6.9%), and tinnitus (5.6%). Neuronetics accounted for 45.5% of reports, likely reflecting market share. Median reporting delay was 1.4 months, with some exceeding 6 years. The literature review identified major innovations, including figure-of-eight and H-coils, double-containment coils, seizure risk screening, and advanced circuitry (eg, insulated-gate bipolar transistors and metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors) enabling magnetic resonance imaging-guided and accelerated protocols. Exploratory developments include wearable systems, auricular stimulation, and artificial intelligence-based individualization.

Conclusion: MAUDE data provide novel insights into TMS safety in real-world settings. Although serious AEs are rare, standardized reporting and continued device innovation are essential to ensure safe and effective clinical use.

背景:经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种经fda批准的神经调节技术,其临床应用范围已扩展到重度抑郁症。尽管使用率越来越高,但尚未发表使用FDA的制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库的tms相关不良事件(ae)的器械无关性分析。目的:基于maude报告的ae,描述TMS设备的真实安全性,包括症状模式、制造商级别的变化、设备问题和报告延迟,同时通过回顾TMS的技术进步将研究结果背景化。方法:从MAUDE中提取到2025年4月所有设备代码为OBP的报告。重复数据删除后,对200个唯一报告进行了描述性分析。我们还进行了一项重点文献综述,以追踪TMS设备开发的安全性和创新趋势。结果:在200例报告中,94.7%涉及伤害,4.1%涉及功能障碍,1.2%涉及死亡。常见症状包括焦虑(8.2%)、神经认知改变(8.0%)、癫痫发作(6.9%)、头痛(6.9%)和耳鸣(5.6%)。Neuronetics占报告的45.5%,可能反映了市场份额。报告延迟的中位数为1.4个月,有些超过6年。文献综述确定了主要的创新,包括8字形和h型线圈、双密封线圈、癫痫风险筛查和先进的电路(例如,绝缘栅双极晶体管和金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管),从而实现磁共振成像引导和加速协议。探索性发展包括可穿戴系统、耳穴刺激和基于人工智能的个性化。结论:MAUDE数据为现实环境中经颅磁刺激的安全性提供了新的见解。虽然严重的不良反应很少见,但标准化的报告和持续的设备创新对于确保安全有效的临床使用至关重要。
{"title":"Postmarketing Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A 10-Year MAUDE Database Analysis of Adverse Events and Technological Advancements.","authors":"Ali Imam Awan, Nida Waheed, Rida Zahra, Allah Dad, Deepan Singh","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Background:</b> Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an FDA-cleared neuromodulation technique with expanding clinical applications beyond major depressive disorder. Despite increasing utilization, there has been no published, device-agnostic analysis of TMS-related adverse events (AEs) using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> To characterize the real-world safety profile of TMS devices based on MAUDE-reported AEs, including symptom patterns, manufacturer-level variations, device issues, and reporting delays, while contextualizing findings through a review of technological advancements in TMS.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> All reports under device code OBP were extracted from MAUDE through April 2025. After deduplication, 200 unique reports were analyzed descriptively. A focused literature review was also conducted to trace safety and innovation trends in TMS device development.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Of 200 reports, 94.7% involved injury, 4.1% malfunction, and 1.2% death. Common symptoms included anxiety (8.2%), neurocognitive changes (8.0%), seizures (6.9%), headache (6.9%), and tinnitus (5.6%). Neuronetics accounted for 45.5% of reports, likely reflecting market share. Median reporting delay was 1.4 months, with some exceeding 6 years. The literature review identified major innovations, including figure-of-eight and H-coils, double-containment coils, seizure risk screening, and advanced circuitry (eg, insulated-gate bipolar transistors and metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors) enabling magnetic resonance imaging-guided and accelerated protocols. Exploratory developments include wearable systems, auricular stimulation, and artificial intelligence-based individualization.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> MAUDE data provide novel insights into TMS safety in real-world settings. Although serious AEs are rare, standardized reporting and continued device innovation are essential to ensure safe and effective clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146183228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The E-Value in Regression: A Useful, Simple, Easily Understood, and Easily Applied Statistic. 回归中的e值:一个有用的、简单的、容易理解的、容易应用的统计量。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-11 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.26f16324
Chittaranjan Andrade

The E-value is most simply described as the smallest strength of association that 1 or more unmeasured confounds must have with both risk factor and outcome to nullify a significant relationship between the risk factor and the outcome in a fully adjusted regression. Thus, the E-value is a measure of how robust a finding may be against unmeasured confounding. This article provides the reader with a primer on the E-value, and with a cheat sheet that simplifies concepts. The full definition of the E-value is stated, and each element in the definition is explained. The E-value is most commonly applied to statistics such as the relative risk, odds ratio, and hazard ratio but can be applied to other statistics, as well. The E-value is usually calculated for 2 estimates: the statistic that measures risk and the limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the statistic that is closest to the null. The former E-value tells us how strong unmeasured confounding should be to bring the value of the statistic to null. The latter E-value tells us how strong unmeasured confounding should be to bring the null value into the 95% CI, thereby making a statistically significant finding nonsignificant. This article also explains the calculation and the interpretation of the E-value. A detailed discussion is provided on what unmeasured confounding means with reference to the E-value. The specificity of the E-value to the context of the study, and the variables adjusted for, is emphasized. Interpretation of the E-value should be based on the plausibility of existence of the unmeasured confounds and the prevalence of these confounds in the population. E-values, surprisingly, are not commonly reported. They should be reported by researchers, requested by reviewers and editors, and calculated by readers to understand how robust statistically significant findings are against unmeasured confounding.

e值最简单地描述为在完全调整回归中,1个或多个未测量混杂因素与风险因素和结果之间必须具有的最小关联强度,以消除风险因素和结果之间的显著关系。因此,e值是衡量一项发现对无法测量的混杂因素的稳健性。本文为读者提供了关于e值的入门知识,并提供了简化概念的备忘单。说明了e值的完整定义,并解释了定义中的每个元素。e值最常应用于统计数据,如相对风险、优势比和风险比,但也可以应用于其他统计数据。e值通常为2个估计值计算:测量风险的统计量和最接近零的统计量的95%置信区间(CI)的极限。前一个e值告诉我们,不可测量的混杂应该有多强才能使统计值为零。后一个e值告诉我们,要使零值进入95% CI,不可测量的混杂因素应该有多强,从而使统计上显著的发现不显著。本文还对e值的计算和解释进行了说明。详细讨论了参考e值的不可测量混淆的含义。强调了e值对研究背景的特异性,以及调整后的变量。对e值的解释应基于未测量混杂因素存在的合理性以及这些混杂因素在人群中的流行程度。令人惊讶的是,e值通常不被报道。它们应该由研究人员报告,由审稿人和编辑提出要求,并由读者计算,以了解统计上显著的发现对未测量的混淆有多强。
{"title":"The E-Value in Regression: A Useful, Simple, Easily Understood, and Easily Applied Statistic.","authors":"Chittaranjan Andrade","doi":"10.4088/JCP.26f16324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.26f16324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The E-value is most simply described as the smallest strength of association that 1 or more unmeasured confounds must have with both risk factor and outcome to nullify a significant relationship between the risk factor and the outcome in a fully adjusted regression. Thus, the E-value is a measure of how robust a finding may be against unmeasured confounding. This article provides the reader with a primer on the E-value, and with a cheat sheet that simplifies concepts. The full definition of the E-value is stated, and each element in the definition is explained. The E-value is most commonly applied to statistics such as the relative risk, odds ratio, and hazard ratio but can be applied to other statistics, as well. The E-value is usually calculated for 2 estimates: the statistic that measures risk and the limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the statistic that is closest to the null. The former E-value tells us how strong unmeasured confounding should be to bring the value of the statistic to null. The latter E-value tells us how strong unmeasured confounding should be to bring the null value into the 95% CI, thereby making a statistically significant finding nonsignificant. This article also explains the calculation and the interpretation of the E-value. A detailed discussion is provided on what unmeasured confounding means with reference to the E-value. The specificity of the E-value to the context of the study, and the variables adjusted for, is emphasized. Interpretation of the E-value should be based on the plausibility of existence of the unmeasured confounds and the prevalence of these confounds in the population. E-values, surprisingly, are not commonly reported. They should be reported by researchers, requested by reviewers and editors, and calculated by readers to understand how robust statistically significant findings are against unmeasured confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146183159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Latency to Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Initiation and Psychiatric Hospitalization in First-Episode Schizophrenia. 首发精神分裂症的长效注射抗精神病药物起始潜伏期和精神病住院。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m16048
Sung Woo Joo, Jungsun Lee

Objective: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are increasingly recommended for patients in the early phase of schizophrenia. We examined how the timing of LAI initiation affects treatment discontinuation and hospitalization duration in first-episode schizophrenia.

Methods: Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims database, we identified 6,380 patients with first-episode schizophrenia receiving continuous LAI treatment. The interval from diagnosis to LAI initiation was categorized into 6 groups (<1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and >5 years). Treatment discontinuation and the proportion of psychiatric hospitalization days during continuous LAI use were analyzed using Cox and linear regression models.

Results: Earlier LAI use increased over time, but the duration of continuous treatment declined. Patients who started LAIs >2 years after diagnosis had lower risks of discontinuation than those within the first year (2-3 years: hazard ratio [HR]=0.77 [0.69-0.87]; 3-4 years: HR=0.77 [0.68-0.86]; 4-5 years: HR=0.70 [0.61-0.79]; >5 years: HR=0.66 [0.59-0.74]). Later initiation was associated with greater psychiatric hospitalization burden, particularly among patients with prior hospitalizations (1-2 years: β=0.039, P=.039; 3-4 years: β=0.057, P=.010; >5 years: β=0.162, P <.001), and within the >5-year group, longer delays further increased hospitalization days (β=1.87×10-4, P<.001).

Conclusion: Although delayed initiation was linked to better treatment adherence, early LAI use reduced hospitalization burden, supporting guidelines advocating earlier LAI treatment in schizophrenia.

目的:长效注射抗精神病药物越来越多地被推荐用于早期精神分裂症患者。我们研究了首次发作精神分裂症患者LAI开始的时间如何影响治疗终止和住院时间。方法:使用韩国健康保险审查和评估服务索赔数据库,我们确定了6,380例接受持续LAI治疗的首发精神分裂症患者。从诊断到LAI发生的时间间隔分为6组(5年)。采用Cox和线性回归模型对持续使用LAI期间的治疗中断和精神科住院天数比例进行分析。结果:早期的LAI使用随着时间的推移而增加,但持续治疗的时间减少。诊断后>2年开始使用的患者停药风险低于1年内(2-3年:风险比[HR]=0.77[0.69-0.87]; 3-4年:HR=0.77[0.68-0.86]; 4-5年:HR=0.70[0.61-0.79]; >5年:HR=0.66[0.59-0.74])。延迟开始治疗与更大的精神病学住院负担相关,特别是在先前住院的患者中(1-2年:β=0.039, P= 0.039; 3-4年:β=0.057, P= 0.010; bbb50年:β=0.162, P 5年组),更长的延迟进一步增加住院天数(β=1.87×10-4, P)结论:尽管延迟开始治疗与更好的治疗依从性有关,早期使用LAI减少了住院负担,支持倡导精神分裂症早期LAI治疗的指南。
{"title":"Latency to Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Initiation and Psychiatric Hospitalization in First-Episode Schizophrenia.","authors":"Sung Woo Joo, Jungsun Lee","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are increasingly recommended for patients in the early phase of schizophrenia. We examined how the timing of LAI initiation affects treatment discontinuation and hospitalization duration in first-episode schizophrenia.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims database, we identified 6,380 patients with first-episode schizophrenia receiving continuous LAI treatment. The interval from diagnosis to LAI initiation was categorized into 6 groups (<1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and >5 years). Treatment discontinuation and the proportion of psychiatric hospitalization days during continuous LAI use were analyzed using Cox and linear regression models.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Earlier LAI use increased over time, but the duration of continuous treatment declined. Patients who started LAIs >2 years after diagnosis had lower risks of discontinuation than those within the first year (2-3 years: hazard ratio [HR]=0.77 [0.69-0.87]; 3-4 years: HR=0.77 [0.68-0.86]; 4-5 years: HR=0.70 [0.61-0.79]; >5 years: HR=0.66 [0.59-0.74]). Later initiation was associated with greater psychiatric hospitalization burden, particularly among patients with prior hospitalizations (1-2 years: β=0.039, <i>P</i>=.039; 3-4 years: β=0.057, <i>P</i>=.010; >5 years: β=0.162, <i>P</i> <.001), and within the >5-year group, longer delays further increased hospitalization days (β=1.87×10<sup>-4</sup>, <i>P</i><.001).</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although delayed initiation was linked to better treatment adherence, early LAI use reduced hospitalization burden, supporting guidelines advocating earlier LAI treatment in schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146183207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts of Infant-Related Sexual Harm: Prevalence and Assessment of Safety. 与婴儿有关的性伤害的不想要的侵入性思想:患病率和安全性评估。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m15985
Quincy M Beck, Juliette Sachet, Claudia Cargnelli, Bronwen Lathrop, Fiona L Challacombe, Nichole Fairbrother

Objectives: Unwanted intrusive thoughts (UITs) of intentional infant-related harm are common among birthing parents. Evidence to date has failed to find any association with physical aggression toward the infant. However, the relationship between UITs of infant-related sexual harm and sexual behaviors toward the infant has yet to be assessed. This is the purpose of the current study.

Methods: Data were collected from February 9, 2014, to February 14, 2017, via a prospective, province-wide, unselected cohort of N = 763 English-speaking birthing parents, n = 502 of whom provided data for the current analysis. Interview assessments of UITs of infant-related sexual harm were administered at approximately 7 weeks postpartum and 4 months postpartum. Sexual harming behaviors toward the infant were assessed via an anonymized questionnaire at the end of the study.

Results: UITs of infant-related sexual harm were reported by 9.2% (n = 38; 95% CI, 6.6-12.4) of participants. We found no evidence of an association between UITs of this nature and sexual behavior toward one's infant (Fisher exact, P = 1.00). Only 1 participant reported engaging in sexual behavior toward their infant, and they did not report any UITs of infant-related sexual harm.

Conclusions: Study findings add to growing evidence that UITs of infant-related harm are common, and when these thoughts are unwanted and intrusive, they are not associated with an increased risk of actually harming one's infant. Although findings suggest that this is also true for UITs of infant-related sexual harm and sexual behavior, due to the small sample employed in this research, replication with a larger sample is needed.

目的:无意的侵入性想法(unit)有意的婴儿相关伤害是常见的在分娩的父母。到目前为止,没有证据表明这与对婴儿的身体攻击有任何联系。然而,与婴儿有关的性伤害的单位与对婴儿的性行为之间的关系尚未得到评估。这是本研究的目的。方法:数据收集于2014年2月9日至2017年2月14日,通过一项前瞻性,全省范围内,未选择的队列,N = 763名讲英语的分娩父母,其中N = 502名为本分析提供数据。在产后约7周和产后4个月对与婴儿有关的性伤害的单位进行访谈评估。在研究结束时,通过匿名问卷对婴儿的性伤害行为进行评估。结果:9.2% (n = 38; 95% CI, 6.6-12.4)的参与者报告了与婴儿相关的性伤害单位。我们没有发现这种性质的单位与对婴儿的性行为之间的关联(Fisher精确,P = 1.00)。只有1名参与者报告了对婴儿的性行为,他们没有报告任何与婴儿有关的性伤害单位。结论:研究结果进一步证明,与婴儿有关的伤害是常见的,当这些想法是不必要的和侵入性的,它们与实际伤害婴儿的风险增加无关。尽管研究结果表明,与婴儿有关的性伤害和性行为的单位也是如此,但由于本研究采用的样本较少,需要用更大的样本进行复制。
{"title":"Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts of Infant-Related Sexual Harm: Prevalence and Assessment of Safety.","authors":"Quincy M Beck, Juliette Sachet, Claudia Cargnelli, Bronwen Lathrop, Fiona L Challacombe, Nichole Fairbrother","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m15985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m15985","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Unwanted intrusive thoughts (UITs) of intentional infant-related harm are common among birthing parents. Evidence to date has failed to find any association with physical aggression toward the infant. However, the relationship between UITs of infant-related sexual harm and sexual behaviors toward the infant has yet to be assessed. This is the purpose of the current study.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Data were collected from February 9, 2014, to February 14, 2017, via a prospective, province-wide, unselected cohort of N = 763 English-speaking birthing parents, n = 502 of whom provided data for the current analysis. Interview assessments of UITs of infant-related sexual harm were administered at approximately 7 weeks postpartum and 4 months postpartum. Sexual harming behaviors toward the infant were assessed via an anonymized questionnaire at the end of the study.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> UITs of infant-related sexual harm were reported by 9.2% (n = 38; 95% CI, 6.6-12.4) of participants. We found no evidence of an association between UITs of this nature and sexual behavior toward one's infant (Fisher exact, <i>P</i> = 1.00). Only 1 participant reported engaging in sexual behavior toward their infant, and they did not report any UITs of infant-related sexual harm.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Study findings add to growing evidence that UITs of infant-related harm are common, and when these thoughts are unwanted and intrusive, they are not associated with an increased risk of actually harming one's infant. Although findings suggest that this is also true for UITs of infant-related sexual harm and sexual behavior, due to the small sample employed in this research, replication with a larger sample is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in US Military Veterans: Prevalence, Correlates, and Clinical Characteristics. 美国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的分离亚型:患病率、相关性和临床特征。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25br15977
Brienna M Fogle, Ian C Fischer, Peter J Na, Robert H Pietrzak
{"title":"Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in US Military Veterans: Prevalence, Correlates, and Clinical Characteristics.","authors":"Brienna M Fogle, Ian C Fischer, Peter J Na, Robert H Pietrzak","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25br15977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25br15977","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated With Revisiting the Emergency Department due to Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents. 儿童和青少年因自杀行为而重访急诊室的相关因素
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.25m15814
Ana María de Granda-Beltrán, Inmaculada Peñuelas-Calvo, María Taracena-Cuerda, Jimena María Merayo-Cano, Lidia Carrillo-Notario, Paula Andrea Hidalgo Muñoz, Hugo J Bello, Roberto Rodríguez-Jiménez, Enrique Baca-García, Alejandro Porras-Segovia

Objective: Suicide is a major public health concern with a significant global impact. Among children and adolescents, an increasing incidence of suicidal behavior is being observed. Several studies have noted an increase in the number of emergency department (ED) consultations involving children and adolescents presenting with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB). However, few studies have yet described risk factors associated with these repeated visits.

Methods: Our sample included all patients under 18 years of age who visited the Child and Adolescent Mental Health ED at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre between January 2, 2022, and November 30, 2023. A baseline interview was conducted by an attending psychiatrist during the patient's first emergency visit, followed by a review of their digital medical records 6 months later by the hospital's clinical staff.

Results: A total of 713 patients were treated in the ED during the study period, of whom 429 (60.16%) presented with suicidal behavior. Within 6 months of the initial ED visit, 25.4% of patients returned due to SITB. Specifically, 21.7% of those who initially attended for SITB returned for the same reason. Among patients who initially presented with suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, 25.8% and 25.3%, respectively, returned within 6 months. The variables independently associated with returning to the ED for SITB after the initial visit were nonheterosexual sexual orientation (odds ratio [OR]=2.10; 95% CI, 1.14-3.87) and prior SITB (OR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.27-3.60).

Conclusions: In our study, we found that a significant number of children and adolescents who come to the ED for SITB return for the same reason within 6 months. There is also a certain amount of switching between different types of SITB consultations, particularly from ideation to attempt. This should alert us to the significant recurrence of these consultations and the fact that mental health resources continue to be insufficient to address these behaviors.

目的:自杀是一个重大的公共卫生问题,具有重大的全球影响。在儿童和青少年中,自杀行为的发生率正在上升。几项研究指出,涉及自残思想和行为(SITB)的儿童和青少年的急诊科(ED)咨询数量有所增加。然而,很少有研究描述了与这些反复就诊相关的风险因素。方法:我们的样本包括2022年1月2日至2023年11月30日期间10月12日在医院大学儿童和青少年心理健康急诊科就诊的所有18岁以下患者。在患者第一次急诊期间,由一名主治精神病医生进行了一次基线访谈,6个月后,医院的临床工作人员对其数字医疗记录进行了审查。结果:研究期间共有713例患者在急诊科接受治疗,其中429例(60.16%)出现自杀行为。在首次ED访问的6个月内,25.4%的患者因SITB而返回。具体来说,21.7%最初参加SITB的人因同样的原因返回。在最初出现自杀意念或自杀企图的患者中,分别有25.8%和25.3%的患者在6个月内返回。与初次就诊后返回ED接受SITB独立相关的变量为非异性性取向(比值比[OR]=2.10; 95% CI, 1.14-3.87)和既往SITB (OR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.27-3.60)。结论:在我们的研究中,我们发现有相当数量的儿童和青少年因同样的原因在6个月内回到急诊科。在不同类型的SITB咨询之间也有一定数量的转换,特别是从构思到尝试。这应该提醒我们注意这些咨询的显著复发,以及精神卫生资源仍然不足以解决这些行为的事实。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Revisiting the Emergency Department due to Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Ana María de Granda-Beltrán, Inmaculada Peñuelas-Calvo, María Taracena-Cuerda, Jimena María Merayo-Cano, Lidia Carrillo-Notario, Paula Andrea Hidalgo Muñoz, Hugo J Bello, Roberto Rodríguez-Jiménez, Enrique Baca-García, Alejandro Porras-Segovia","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m15814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m15814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Suicide is a major public health concern with a significant global impact. Among children and adolescents, an increasing incidence of suicidal behavior is being observed. Several studies have noted an increase in the number of emergency department (ED) consultations involving children and adolescents presenting with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB). However, few studies have yet described risk factors associated with these repeated visits.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Our sample included all patients under 18 years of age who visited the Child and Adolescent Mental Health ED at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre between January 2, 2022, and November 30, 2023. A baseline interview was conducted by an attending psychiatrist during the patient's first emergency visit, followed by a review of their digital medical records 6 months later by the hospital's clinical staff.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A total of 713 patients were treated in the ED during the study period, of whom 429 (60.16%) presented with suicidal behavior. Within 6 months of the initial ED visit, 25.4% of patients returned due to SITB. Specifically, 21.7% of those who initially attended for SITB returned for the same reason. Among patients who initially presented with suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, 25.8% and 25.3%, respectively, returned within 6 months. The variables independently associated with returning to the ED for SITB after the initial visit were nonheterosexual sexual orientation (odds ratio [OR]=2.10; 95% CI, 1.14-3.87) and prior SITB (OR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.27-3.60).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> In our study, we found that a significant number of children and adolescents who come to the ED for SITB return for the same reason within 6 months. There is also a certain amount of switching between different types of SITB consultations, particularly from ideation to attempt. This should alert us to the significant recurrence of these consultations and the fact that mental health resources continue to be insufficient to address these behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1