Sindhura Vangala, Roy Williams, Cara M Buskmiller, Jessian L Munoz
{"title":"Mental Health Assessments for Fetal Interventions.","authors":"Sindhura Vangala, Roy Williams, Cara M Buskmiller, Jessian L Munoz","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24l15275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24l15275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mina M Rizk, Lindsay Bolton, Flurin Cathomas, Helen He, Scott J Russo, Emma Guttman-Yassky, J John Mann, James Murrough
Importance: Increasing evidence suggests a potential role of immune-modulatory drugs for treatment-resistant depression. This scoping review explores the emerging evidence regarding the antidepressant effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a relatively newer class of immune therapeutics with favorable safety profile.
Observations: PubMed was searched up to November 2023 for English publications addressing the antidepressant effects of mAbs, including meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, open-label, single-arm studies, and case series. Several mAbs have shown potential antidepressant effects, but most studies in primary inflammatory disorders included patients with mild depression. Only infliximab and sirukumab were directly examined in individuals with primary depression. mAbs that do not require laboratory monitoring, such as ixekizumab and dupilumab, could hold potential promise if future studies establish their safety profile regarding suicide risk.
Conclusions and Relevance: The use of several mAbs for the treatment of primary inflammatory disorders has been associated with improvement of comorbid depressive symptoms. Given their unique mechanisms of action, mAbs may offer a new hope for depressed patients who do not respond to currently available antidepressants. Further research addressing individuals with more severe depressive symptoms is essential. Direct examination of antidepressant effects of mAbs in people with primary depressive disorders is also crucial to refine their clinical use in the treatment of depression.
{"title":"Immune-Targeted Therapies for Depression: Current Evidence for Antidepressant Effects of Monoclonal Antibodies.","authors":"Mina M Rizk, Lindsay Bolton, Flurin Cathomas, Helen He, Scott J Russo, Emma Guttman-Yassky, J John Mann, James Murrough","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23nr15243","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.23nr15243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> Increasing evidence suggests a potential role of immune-modulatory drugs for treatment-resistant depression. This scoping review explores the emerging evidence regarding the antidepressant effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a relatively newer class of immune therapeutics with favorable safety profile.</p><p><p><b>Observations:</b> PubMed was searched up to November 2023 for English publications addressing the antidepressant effects of mAbs, including meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, open-label, single-arm studies, and case series. Several mAbs have shown potential antidepressant effects, but most studies in primary inflammatory disorders included patients with mild depression. Only infliximab and sirukumab were directly examined in individuals with primary depression. mAbs that do not require laboratory monitoring, such as ixekizumab and dupilumab, could hold potential promise if future studies establish their safety profile regarding suicide risk.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> The use of several mAbs for the treatment of primary inflammatory disorders has been associated with improvement of comorbid depressive symptoms. Given their unique mechanisms of action, mAbs may offer a new hope for depressed patients who do not respond to currently available antidepressants. Further research addressing individuals with more severe depressive symptoms is essential. Direct examination of antidepressant effects of mAbs in people with primary depressive disorders is also crucial to refine their clinical use in the treatment of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dianying Liu, Gang Lei, Dian Li, Hongdong Deng, Xiang Yang Zhang, Yonghui Dang
Abstract.
Background: Sex differences in suicide attempts have been widely recognized across domains such as depression and rumination. The relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in mood disorders has been studied before; however, how they interact across sexes remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the sex differences in the relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in Chinese adolescents with mood disorders.
Methods: We recruited 681 adolescents with mood disorders who met ICD-10 criteria for having unipolar or bipolar depression with a current depressive episode at the time of the study and collected demographic and clinical data.
Results: The prevalence of suicide attempts in female adolescents with mood disorders (64.36%) was significantly higher than that in male adolescents with mood disorders (49.47%), with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.31-2.59). Regression analysis showed that PHQ-9 was independently associated with suicide attempts among male adolescents with mood disorders, while in female adolescents with mood disorders, total scores of PHQ-9 and RRS-10 were independently associated with suicide attempts. Importantly, in female adolescents with mood disorders, the mediating effect of RRS-10 total score on the relationship between PHQ-9 and suicide attempts was significant (standardized β = 0.005, P = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.002-0.008), the mediating effect accounted for 31.25% of the total effect of depressive symptoms on suicide attempts.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that there are sex differences in depression, rumination, and suicide attempts and in the interaction between them in adolescents with mood disorders. These sex differences may have important clinical implications, both for improving strategies to detect suicidal behaviors and for developing better early intervention programs for this population.
{"title":"Depression, Rumination, and Suicide Attempts in Adolescents With Mood Disorders: Sex Differences in This Relationship.","authors":"Dianying Liu, Gang Lei, Dian Li, Hongdong Deng, Xiang Yang Zhang, Yonghui Dang","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Abstract</b>.</p><p><p><b>Background:</b> Sex differences in suicide attempts have been widely recognized across domains such as depression and rumination. The relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in mood disorders has been studied before; however, how they interact across sexes remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the sex differences in the relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in Chinese adolescents with mood disorders.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We recruited 681 adolescents with mood disorders who met ICD-10 criteria for having unipolar or bipolar depression with a current depressive episode at the time of the study and collected demographic and clinical data.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The prevalence of suicide attempts in female adolescents with mood disorders (64.36%) was significantly higher than that in male adolescents with mood disorders (49.47%), with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.31-2.59). Regression analysis showed that PHQ-9 was independently associated with suicide attempts among male adolescents with mood disorders, while in female adolescents with mood disorders, total scores of PHQ-9 and RRS-10 were independently associated with suicide attempts. Importantly, in female adolescents with mood disorders, the mediating effect of RRS-10 total score on the relationship between PHQ-9 and suicide attempts was significant (standardized β = 0.005, <i>P</i> = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.002-0.008), the mediating effect accounted for 31.25% of the total effect of depressive symptoms on suicide attempts.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our study suggests that there are sex differences in depression, rumination, and suicide attempts and in the interaction between them in adolescents with mood disorders. These sex differences may have important clinical implications, both for improving strategies to detect suicidal behaviors and for developing better early intervention programs for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maurizio Fava, Stephen M Stahl, Luca Pani, Sara De Martin, Andrew J Cutler, Vladimir Maletic, Charles W Gorodetzky, Frank J Vocci, Frank L Sapienza, Thomas R Kosten, Cornelia Kröger, Paggard Champasa, Cedric O'Gorman, Clotilde Guidetti, Andrea Alimonti, Stefano Comai, Andrea Mattarei, Franco Folli, David Bushnell, Sergio Traversa, Charles E Inturrisi, Paolo L Manfredi, Marco Pappagallo
Objective: To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants.
Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD (DSM-5) were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35).
Results: For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant (P = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% (P = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% (P = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 (P = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; P = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; P = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups.
Conclusions: The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Esmethadone (REL-1017) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Inadequate Response to Standard Antidepressants: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Maurizio Fava, Stephen M Stahl, Luca Pani, Sara De Martin, Andrew J Cutler, Vladimir Maletic, Charles W Gorodetzky, Frank J Vocci, Frank L Sapienza, Thomas R Kosten, Cornelia Kröger, Paggard Champasa, Cedric O'Gorman, Clotilde Guidetti, Andrea Alimonti, Stefano Comai, Andrea Mattarei, Franco Folli, David Bushnell, Sergio Traversa, Charles E Inturrisi, Paolo L Manfredi, Marco Pappagallo","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15265","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.24m15265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD (<i>DSM-5</i>) were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35).</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% (<i>P</i> = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% (<i>P</i> = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 (<i>P</i> = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; <i>P</i> = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; <i>P</i> = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04688164.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"JCP's Focus on Women's Mental Health: Twenty Years and Counting.","authors":"Marlene P Freeman","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23ed15239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23ed15239","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joanna M Streck, Maria A Parker, Raul Cruz, Rachel L Rosen, Timothy B Baker, Megan E Piper, Andrea H Weinberger
Objective: Few national estimates are available on the prevalence of tobacco use disorder (TUD) in the United States (US), and most trials exclusively assess daily smoking rather than TUD. We examined the prevalence and trends in cigarette smoking with vs without TUD among adults.
Methods: Data came from the 2010-2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 483,982), a cross sectional, US representative dataset. A TUD composite variable was created based on established definitions (eg, DSM-5 symptoms). Weighted prevalence of past 30-day cigarette smoking, daily smoking (30/30 days) and nondaily smoking (<30/30 days) with and without TUD, was calculated annually.
Results: In 2021, the prevalence of past 30- day overall cigarette smoking was 17%; 11% reported daily cigarette smoking, whereas 6% reported nondaily cigarette smoking. Only 1% of the population reported daily smoking without TUD, whereas 10% reported daily smoking with TUD. Two percent of the population reported nondaily smoking without TUD, and 4% of the population reported nondaily smoking with TUD. Daily smoking with TUD and nondaily smoking with and without TUD decreased significantly from 2010 to 2021 (all P's < .001). US adults reporting TUD symptoms (vs not) were more likely to be older, identify as White, have lower income and less education, and have a substance use disorder.
Conclusions: The prevalence of daily cigarette smoking with TUD was 10× higher than the prevalence of daily cigarette smoking without TUD. Twice as many US adults with nondaily smoking reported TUD than no TUD, illustrating that daily smoking is not necessary for TUD.
目的:很少有关于美国烟草使用障碍(TUD)患病率的全国性估计数据,而且大多数试验只评估日常吸烟而非TUD。我们研究了成年人中患有与未患有烟草使用障碍的吸烟率及其变化趋势:数据来自 2010-2021 年全国药物使用和健康调查(n = 483,982 人),这是一个具有美国代表性的横断面数据集。根据既定定义(如 DSM-5 症状)创建了 TUD 综合变量。过去 30 天吸烟、每天吸烟(30/30 天)和非每天吸烟的加权吸烟率(结果:过去 30 天吸烟率为 30%,每天吸烟率为 30%,非每天吸烟率为 30%):2021 年,过去 30 天总体吸烟率为 17%;11% 报告每天吸烟,6% 报告非每天吸烟。只有 1%的人报告在不使用宫颈管的情况下每天吸烟,而 10%的人报告在使用宫颈管的情况下每天吸烟。2%的人群报告在不使用 TUD 的情况下非每天吸烟,4%的人群报告在使用 TUD 的情况下非每天吸烟。从 2010 年到 2021 年,每天吸食 TUD 以及非每天吸食和不吸食 TUD 的人数明显减少(所有 P 均小于 .001)。报告TUD症状(与未报告TUD症状)的美国成年人更有可能年龄较大、为白人、收入较低、受教育程度较低以及患有药物使用障碍:结论:患有 TUD 的每日吸烟率是未患有 TUD 的每日吸烟率的 10 倍。非每日吸烟的美国成年人中,报告患有 TUD 的人数是未患有 TUD 的人数的两倍,这说明每日吸烟并非 TUD 的必要条件。
{"title":"Prevalence and Trends in Cigarette Smoking With and Without Tobacco Use Disorder Among Adults in the United States: 2010-2021.","authors":"Joanna M Streck, Maria A Parker, Raul Cruz, Rachel L Rosen, Timothy B Baker, Megan E Piper, Andrea H Weinberger","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Few national estimates are available on the prevalence of tobacco use disorder (TUD) in the United States (US), and most trials exclusively assess daily smoking rather than TUD. We examined the prevalence and trends in cigarette smoking with vs without TUD among adults.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Data came from the 2010-2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 483,982), a cross sectional, US representative dataset. A TUD composite variable was created based on established definitions (eg, <i>DSM-5</i> symptoms). Weighted prevalence of past 30-day cigarette smoking, daily smoking (30/30 days) and nondaily smoking (<30/30 days) with and without TUD, was calculated annually.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In 2021, the prevalence of past 30- day overall cigarette smoking was 17%; 11% reported daily cigarette smoking, whereas 6% reported nondaily cigarette smoking. Only 1% of the population reported daily smoking without TUD, whereas 10% reported daily smoking with TUD. Two percent of the population reported nondaily smoking without TUD, and 4% of the population reported nondaily smoking with TUD. Daily smoking with TUD and nondaily smoking with and without TUD decreased significantly from 2010 to 2021 (all <i>P</i>'s < .001). US adults reporting TUD symptoms (vs not) were more likely to be older, identify as White, have lower income and less education, and have a substance use disorder.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The prevalence of daily cigarette smoking with TUD was 10× higher than the prevalence of daily cigarette smoking without TUD. Twice as many US adults with nondaily smoking reported TUD than no TUD, illustrating that daily smoking is not necessary for TUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Extreme Dysphoria of Pregnancy: A Distinct Syndrome Warranting Attention?","authors":"Marlene P Freeman","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23com15238","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.23com15238","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica L W Mayer, Hannah K Betcher, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Amy Yang, Alfred L George, Tatiana Abramova, Catherine S Stika, Katherine L Wisner, Crystal T Clark, Jacqueline Gollan
Objective: The effectiveness of antidepressant treatment for mood disorders is often limited by either a poor response or the emergence of adverse effects. These complications often necessitate multiple drug trials. This clinical challenge intensifies during pregnancy, when medications must be selected to improve the likelihood of response and optimize reproductive outcomes. We determined the distribution of common pharmacogenetic variants, metabolizer phenotypes, past medication responses, and side effects in childbearing-aged individuals seeking treatment in a tertiary care perinatal mental health clinic.
Methods: Sixty treatment-seeking women (based on sex at birth) with DSM-5- defined bipolar disorder (n = 28) or major depressive disorder (n = 32) provided DNA samples and completed psychiatric diagnostic and severity assessments between April 2014 and December 2017. Samples were genotyped for single-nucleotide variants in drug metabolizing enzyme genes of commonly prescribed antidepressants (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, and 3A5), and the frequency of normative metabolizer status was compared to reference populations data from Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. The Antidepressant Treatment History Form was used to record historic medication trials and side effects.
Results: A significantly greater proportion of extensive metabolizers for CYP2B6 was observed in the study population when compared to CPIC population frequency databases in Caucasians (0.64 vs 0.43 [95% CI: 0.49-0.76]; P value = .006) and African Americans (0.71 vs 0.33 [95% CI: 0.29-0.96]; P value = .045). No significant association was found between metabolizer phenotype and the likelihood of a medication side effect.
Conclusion: Pharmacogenomic testing may have value for personalized prescribing in individuals capable of or considering pregnancy.
{"title":"Pharmacogenomic Characterization of Childbearing-Aged Individuals With Mood Disorders in a Tertiary Care Perinatal Mental Health Clinic.","authors":"Jessica L W Mayer, Hannah K Betcher, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Amy Yang, Alfred L George, Tatiana Abramova, Catherine S Stika, Katherine L Wisner, Crystal T Clark, Jacqueline Gollan","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> The effectiveness of antidepressant treatment for mood disorders is often limited by either a poor response or the emergence of adverse effects. These complications often necessitate multiple drug trials. This clinical challenge intensifies during pregnancy, when medications must be selected to improve the likelihood of response and optimize reproductive outcomes. We determined the distribution of common pharmacogenetic variants, metabolizer phenotypes, past medication responses, and side effects in childbearing-aged individuals seeking treatment in a tertiary care perinatal mental health clinic.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Sixty treatment-seeking women (based on sex at birth) with <i>DSM-5-</i> defined bipolar disorder (n = 28) or major depressive disorder (n = 32) provided DNA samples and completed psychiatric diagnostic and severity assessments between April 2014 and December 2017. Samples were genotyped for single-nucleotide variants in drug metabolizing enzyme genes of commonly prescribed antidepressants (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, and 3A5), and the frequency of normative metabolizer status was compared to reference populations data from Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. The Antidepressant Treatment History Form was used to record historic medication trials and side effects.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A significantly greater proportion of extensive metabolizers for CYP2B6 was observed in the study population when compared to CPIC population frequency databases in Caucasians (0.64 vs 0.43 [95% CI: 0.49-0.76]; <i>P</i> value = .006) and African Americans (0.71 vs 0.33 [95% CI: 0.29-0.96]; <i>P</i> value = .045). No significant association was found between metabolizer phenotype and the likelihood of a medication side effect.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Pharmacogenomic testing may have value for personalized prescribing in individuals capable of or considering pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kenda R Stewart Steffensmeier, Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Nancy Bernardy, Daniel Ball, Nicole L Johnson, Jennifer Van Tiem, Brian C Lund
Objectives: Women veterans are more likely than men veterans to receive medications that Department of Veterans Affairs clinical practice guidelines recommend against to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To understand this difference, we examined potential confounders in incident prescribing of guideline discordant medications (GDMs) in veterans with PTSD.
Methods: Veterans receiving care for PTSD during 2020 were identified using Veterans Health Administration administrative data. PTSD diagnosis was established by the presence of at least 1 ICD-10 coded outpatient encounter or inpatient hospitalization during the calendar year 2020. Incident GDM prescribing was assessed during 2021, including benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, select anticonvulsants, and select antidepressants. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the difference in risk for GDM initiation between men and women, adjusted for patient, prescriber, and facility-level covariates, and to identify key confounding variables.
Results: Of 704,699 veterans with PTSD, 16.9% of women and 10.1% of men initiated a GDM, an increased risk of 67% for women [relative risk (RR) = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.65-1.70]. After adjustment, the gender difference decreased to 1.22 (95% CI, 1.20-1.24) in a fully specified model. Three key confounding variables were identified: bipolar disorder (RR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.57-1.63), age (<40 years: RR = 1.20 [1.18-1.22]; 40-54 years: RR = 1.13 [1.11-1.16]; ≥65 years: RR = 0.64 [0.62-0.65]), and count of distinct psychiatric medications prescribed in the prior year (RR = 1.14; 1.13-1.14).
Conclusions: Women veterans with PTSD were 67% more likely to initiate a GDM, where more than half of this effect was explained by bipolar disorder, age, and prior psychiatric medication. After adjustment, women veterans remained at 22% greater risk for an incident GDM, suggesting that other factors remain unidentified and warrant further investigation.
{"title":"What's Gender Got to Do With It: Accounting for Differences in Incident Guideline Discordant Prescribing for PTSD Among Women and Men Veterans.","authors":"Kenda R Stewart Steffensmeier, Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Nancy Bernardy, Daniel Ball, Nicole L Johnson, Jennifer Van Tiem, Brian C Lund","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Women veterans are more likely than men veterans to receive medications that Department of Veterans Affairs clinical practice guidelines recommend against to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To understand this difference, we examined potential confounders in incident prescribing of guideline discordant medications (GDMs) in veterans with PTSD.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Veterans receiving care for PTSD during 2020 were identified using Veterans Health Administration administrative data. PTSD diagnosis was established by the presence of at least 1 <i>ICD-10</i> coded outpatient encounter or inpatient hospitalization during the calendar year 2020. Incident GDM prescribing was assessed during 2021, including benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, select anticonvulsants, and select antidepressants. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the difference in risk for GDM initiation between men and women, adjusted for patient, prescriber, and facility-level covariates, and to identify key confounding variables.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Of 704,699 veterans with PTSD, 16.9% of women and 10.1% of men initiated a GDM, an increased risk of 67% for women [relative risk (RR) = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.65-1.70]. After adjustment, the gender difference decreased to 1.22 (95% CI, 1.20-1.24) in a fully specified model. Three key confounding variables were identified: bipolar disorder (RR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.57-1.63), age (<40 years: RR = 1.20 [1.18-1.22]; 40-54 years: RR = 1.13 [1.11-1.16]; ≥65 years: RR = 0.64 [0.62-0.65]), and count of distinct psychiatric medications prescribed in the prior year (RR = 1.14; 1.13-1.14).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Women veterans with PTSD were 67% more likely to initiate a GDM, where more than half of this effect was explained by bipolar disorder, age, and prior psychiatric medication. After adjustment, women veterans remained at 22% greater risk for an incident GDM, suggesting that other factors remain unidentified and warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141248811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using THC Edible Gummies for Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia: Reply to Goldman and Markov.","authors":"Erin K Zahradnik, Cristian Hernandez","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24lr15255a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24lr15255a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141248804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}