首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
Mental Health Assessments for Fetal Interventions. 胎儿干预的心理健康评估。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.24l15275
Sindhura Vangala, Roy Williams, Cara M Buskmiller, Jessian L Munoz
{"title":"Mental Health Assessments for Fetal Interventions.","authors":"Sindhura Vangala, Roy Williams, Cara M Buskmiller, Jessian L Munoz","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24l15275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24l15275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immune-Targeted Therapies for Depression: Current Evidence for Antidepressant Effects of Monoclonal Antibodies. 抑郁症的免疫靶向疗法:单克隆抗体抗抑郁作用的现有证据。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23nr15243
Mina M Rizk, Lindsay Bolton, Flurin Cathomas, Helen He, Scott J Russo, Emma Guttman-Yassky, J John Mann, James Murrough

Importance: Increasing evidence suggests a potential role of immune-modulatory drugs for treatment-resistant depression. This scoping review explores the emerging evidence regarding the antidepressant effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a relatively newer class of immune therapeutics with favorable safety profile.

Observations: PubMed was searched up to November 2023 for English publications addressing the antidepressant effects of mAbs, including meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, open-label, single-arm studies, and case series. Several mAbs have shown potential antidepressant effects, but most studies in primary inflammatory disorders included patients with mild depression. Only infliximab and sirukumab were directly examined in individuals with primary depression. mAbs that do not require laboratory monitoring, such as ixekizumab and dupilumab, could hold potential promise if future studies establish their safety profile regarding suicide risk.

Conclusions and Relevance: The use of several mAbs for the treatment of primary inflammatory disorders has been associated with improvement of comorbid depressive symptoms. Given their unique mechanisms of action, mAbs may offer a new hope for depressed patients who do not respond to currently available antidepressants. Further research addressing individuals with more severe depressive symptoms is essential. Direct examination of antidepressant effects of mAbs in people with primary depressive disorders is also crucial to refine their clinical use in the treatment of depression.

重要性:越来越多的证据表明,免疫调节药物在治疗耐药性抑郁症方面具有潜在作用。本范围综述探讨了有关单克隆抗体(mAbs)抗抑郁作用的新兴证据,这是一类较新的免疫疗法,具有良好的安全性:在PubMed上搜索了截至2023年11月有关mAbs抗抑郁作用的英文出版物,包括荟萃分析、随机对照试验、开放标签、单臂研究和病例系列。有几种 mAbs 已显示出潜在的抗抑郁作用,但大多数针对原发性炎症性疾病的研究都包括轻度抑郁症患者。只有英夫利昔单抗和sirukumab在原发性抑郁症患者中进行了直接研究。 如果未来的研究能确定ixekizumab和dupilumab等不需要实验室监测的mAbs在自杀风险方面的安全性,那么它们就可能具有潜在的前景:使用多种 mAbs 治疗原发性炎症性疾病与合并抑郁症状的改善有关。鉴于其独特的作用机制,mAbs 可为对现有抗抑郁药物无反应的抑郁症患者带来新的希望。针对抑郁症状更为严重的患者开展进一步研究至关重要。直接研究 mAbs 在原发性抑郁症患者中的抗抑郁效果对于完善其在抑郁症治疗中的临床应用也至关重要。
{"title":"Immune-Targeted Therapies for Depression: Current Evidence for Antidepressant Effects of Monoclonal Antibodies.","authors":"Mina M Rizk, Lindsay Bolton, Flurin Cathomas, Helen He, Scott J Russo, Emma Guttman-Yassky, J John Mann, James Murrough","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23nr15243","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.23nr15243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> Increasing evidence suggests a potential role of immune-modulatory drugs for treatment-resistant depression. This scoping review explores the emerging evidence regarding the antidepressant effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a relatively newer class of immune therapeutics with favorable safety profile.</p><p><p><b>Observations:</b> PubMed was searched up to November 2023 for English publications addressing the antidepressant effects of mAbs, including meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, open-label, single-arm studies, and case series. Several mAbs have shown potential antidepressant effects, but most studies in primary inflammatory disorders included patients with mild depression. Only infliximab and sirukumab were directly examined in individuals with primary depression. mAbs that do not require laboratory monitoring, such as ixekizumab and dupilumab, could hold potential promise if future studies establish their safety profile regarding suicide risk.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> The use of several mAbs for the treatment of primary inflammatory disorders has been associated with improvement of comorbid depressive symptoms. Given their unique mechanisms of action, mAbs may offer a new hope for depressed patients who do not respond to currently available antidepressants. Further research addressing individuals with more severe depressive symptoms is essential. Direct examination of antidepressant effects of mAbs in people with primary depressive disorders is also crucial to refine their clinical use in the treatment of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Depression, Rumination, and Suicide Attempts in Adolescents With Mood Disorders: Sex Differences in This Relationship. 患有情绪障碍的青少年的抑郁、反刍和自杀企图:这种关系中的性别差异。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23m15136
Dianying Liu, Gang Lei, Dian Li, Hongdong Deng, Xiang Yang Zhang, Yonghui Dang

Abstract.

Background: Sex differences in suicide attempts have been widely recognized across domains such as depression and rumination. The relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in mood disorders has been studied before; however, how they interact across sexes remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the sex differences in the relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in Chinese adolescents with mood disorders.

Methods: We recruited 681 adolescents with mood disorders who met ICD-10 criteria for having unipolar or bipolar depression with a current depressive episode at the time of the study and collected demographic and clinical data.

Results: The prevalence of suicide attempts in female adolescents with mood disorders (64.36%) was significantly higher than that in male adolescents with mood disorders (49.47%), with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.31-2.59). Regression analysis showed that PHQ-9 was independently associated with suicide attempts among male adolescents with mood disorders, while in female adolescents with mood disorders, total scores of PHQ-9 and RRS-10 were independently associated with suicide attempts. Importantly, in female adolescents with mood disorders, the mediating effect of RRS-10 total score on the relationship between PHQ-9 and suicide attempts was significant (standardized β = 0.005, P = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.002-0.008), the mediating effect accounted for 31.25% of the total effect of depressive symptoms on suicide attempts.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that there are sex differences in depression, rumination, and suicide attempts and in the interaction between them in adolescents with mood disorders. These sex differences may have important clinical implications, both for improving strategies to detect suicidal behaviors and for developing better early intervention programs for this population.

摘要.背景:自杀企图的性别差异已在抑郁和反刍等领域得到广泛认可。抑郁、反刍和自杀企图之间的关系在情绪障碍中已有研究,但它们在不同性别间如何相互作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨中国情绪障碍青少年抑郁、反刍和自杀企图之间的性别差异:我们招募了681名患有情绪障碍的青少年,这些青少年在研究时符合ICD-10标准,即患有单相抑郁症或双相抑郁症,且当前有抑郁发作,我们收集了这些青少年的人口统计学和临床数据:患有情绪障碍的女性青少年自杀未遂率(64.36%)明显高于男性青少年(49.47%),几率比为 1.84(95% CI,1.31-2.59)。回归分析表明,在患有情绪障碍的男性青少年中,PHQ-9与自杀企图独立相关,而在患有情绪障碍的女性青少年中,PHQ-9和RRS-10的总分与自杀企图独立相关。重要的是,在患有情绪障碍的女性青少年中,RRS-10总分对PHQ-9与自杀未遂之间关系的中介效应是显著的(标准化β=0.005,P=0.003,95% CI,0.002-0.008),中介效应占抑郁症状对自杀未遂总效应的31.25%:我们的研究表明,患有情绪障碍的青少年在抑郁、反刍、自杀企图以及它们之间的相互作用方面存在性别差异。这些性别差异可能具有重要的临床意义,既有助于改进发现自杀行为的策略,也有助于为这一人群制定更好的早期干预计划。
{"title":"Depression, Rumination, and Suicide Attempts in Adolescents With Mood Disorders: Sex Differences in This Relationship.","authors":"Dianying Liu, Gang Lei, Dian Li, Hongdong Deng, Xiang Yang Zhang, Yonghui Dang","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Abstract</b>.</p><p><p><b>Background:</b> Sex differences in suicide attempts have been widely recognized across domains such as depression and rumination. The relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in mood disorders has been studied before; however, how they interact across sexes remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the sex differences in the relationship between depression, rumination, and suicide attempts in Chinese adolescents with mood disorders.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We recruited 681 adolescents with mood disorders who met ICD-10 criteria for having unipolar or bipolar depression with a current depressive episode at the time of the study and collected demographic and clinical data.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The prevalence of suicide attempts in female adolescents with mood disorders (64.36%) was significantly higher than that in male adolescents with mood disorders (49.47%), with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.31-2.59). Regression analysis showed that PHQ-9 was independently associated with suicide attempts among male adolescents with mood disorders, while in female adolescents with mood disorders, total scores of PHQ-9 and RRS-10 were independently associated with suicide attempts. Importantly, in female adolescents with mood disorders, the mediating effect of RRS-10 total score on the relationship between PHQ-9 and suicide attempts was significant (standardized β = 0.005, <i>P</i> = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.002-0.008), the mediating effect accounted for 31.25% of the total effect of depressive symptoms on suicide attempts.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our study suggests that there are sex differences in depression, rumination, and suicide attempts and in the interaction between them in adolescents with mood disorders. These sex differences may have important clinical implications, both for improving strategies to detect suicidal behaviors and for developing better early intervention programs for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Esmethadone (REL-1017) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Inadequate Response to Standard Antidepressants: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. 艾司美沙酮(REL-1017)对标准抗抑郁药无效的重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性:3期随机对照试验》。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.24m15265
Maurizio Fava, Stephen M Stahl, Luca Pani, Sara De Martin, Andrew J Cutler, Vladimir Maletic, Charles W Gorodetzky, Frank J Vocci, Frank L Sapienza, Thomas R Kosten, Cornelia Kröger, Paggard Champasa, Cedric O'Gorman, Clotilde Guidetti, Andrea Alimonti, Stefano Comai, Andrea Mattarei, Franco Folli, David Bushnell, Sergio Traversa, Charles E Inturrisi, Paolo L Manfredi, Marco Pappagallo

Objective: To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants.

Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD (DSM-5) were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35).

Results: For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant (P = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% (P = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% (P = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 (P = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; P = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; P = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions: The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04688164.

目的:测试艾司美沙酮(REL-1017)对重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的辅助治疗效果:测试艾司美沙酮(REL-1017)作为重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的辅助治疗药物以及对标准抗抑郁药的不良反应:在这项3期双盲安慰剂对照试验中,患有MDD(DSM-5)的门诊患者在2020年12月至2022年12月期间随机接受每日口服艾司美沙酮(第1天75毫克,第2天至第28天每天25毫克)或安慰剂治疗。主要疗效指标是蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分从基线(CFB)到第28天的变化。意向治疗(ITT)人群包括所有随机参与者。按方案(PP)人群包括未出现影响评估的重大方案偏差的完成者。事后分析包括患有严重抑郁症的参与者(基线 MADRS 评分≥35):在ITT分析(n = 227)中,艾司美沙酮(n = 113)和安慰剂(n = 114)的平均CFB分别为15.1(SD 11.3)和12.9(SD 10.4),平均差异(MD)为2.3,无统计学意义(P = .154;科恩效应大小[ES] = 0.21)。艾司美沙酮和安慰剂的缓解率分别为22.1%和13.2%(P = .076),反应率分别为39.8%和27.2%(P = .044)。在PP分析(n = 198)中,艾司美沙酮(n = 101)和安慰剂(n = 97)的平均CFB分别为15.6(SD 11.2)和12.5(SD 9.9),MD为3.1(P = .051;ES =0.29)。对基线MADRS≥35的患者进行事后分析,ITT人群(n = 112)的MD为6.9;P = .0059;ES = 0.57,PP人群(n = 98)的MD为7.9;P = .0015;ES = 0.69。不良事件(AEs)主要为轻度或中度和一过性,组间无显著差异:结论:主要终点未达到。艾司美沙酮在PP分析中比ITT分析中显示出更强的疗效,这种差异不能归因于影响治疗依从性的不良反应。在对严重抑郁症患者进行的事后分析中,疗效显著。艾司美沙酮的耐受性良好,与之前的研究结果一致:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT04688164。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Esmethadone (REL-1017) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Inadequate Response to Standard Antidepressants: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Maurizio Fava, Stephen M Stahl, Luca Pani, Sara De Martin, Andrew J Cutler, Vladimir Maletic, Charles W Gorodetzky, Frank J Vocci, Frank L Sapienza, Thomas R Kosten, Cornelia Kröger, Paggard Champasa, Cedric O'Gorman, Clotilde Guidetti, Andrea Alimonti, Stefano Comai, Andrea Mattarei, Franco Folli, David Bushnell, Sergio Traversa, Charles E Inturrisi, Paolo L Manfredi, Marco Pappagallo","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15265","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.24m15265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD (<i>DSM-5</i>) were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35).</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% (<i>P</i> = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% (<i>P</i> = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 (<i>P</i> = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; <i>P</i> = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; <i>P</i> = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04688164.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
JCP's Focus on Women's Mental Health: Twenty Years and Counting. JCP 关注女性心理健康:二十年来一直如此。
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23ed15239
Marlene P Freeman
{"title":"JCP's Focus on Women's Mental Health: Twenty Years and Counting.","authors":"Marlene P Freeman","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23ed15239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23ed15239","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and Trends in Cigarette Smoking With and Without Tobacco Use Disorder Among Adults in the United States: 2010-2021. 2010-2021 年美国成年人中伴有和不伴有烟草使用障碍的吸烟率和趋势:2010-2021.
IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23m15086
Joanna M Streck, Maria A Parker, Raul Cruz, Rachel L Rosen, Timothy B Baker, Megan E Piper, Andrea H Weinberger

Objective: Few national estimates are available on the prevalence of tobacco use disorder (TUD) in the United States (US), and most trials exclusively assess daily smoking rather than TUD. We examined the prevalence and trends in cigarette smoking with vs without TUD among adults.

Methods: Data came from the 2010-2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 483,982), a cross sectional, US representative dataset. A TUD composite variable was created based on established definitions (eg, DSM-5 symptoms). Weighted prevalence of past 30-day cigarette smoking, daily smoking (30/30 days) and nondaily smoking (<30/30 days) with and without TUD, was calculated annually.

Results: In 2021, the prevalence of past 30- day overall cigarette smoking was 17%; 11% reported daily cigarette smoking, whereas 6% reported nondaily cigarette smoking. Only 1% of the population reported daily smoking without TUD, whereas 10% reported daily smoking with TUD. Two percent of the population reported nondaily smoking without TUD, and 4% of the population reported nondaily smoking with TUD. Daily smoking with TUD and nondaily smoking with and without TUD decreased significantly from 2010 to 2021 (all P's < .001). US adults reporting TUD symptoms (vs not) were more likely to be older, identify as White, have lower income and less education, and have a substance use disorder.

Conclusions: The prevalence of daily cigarette smoking with TUD was 10× higher than the prevalence of daily cigarette smoking without TUD. Twice as many US adults with nondaily smoking reported TUD than no TUD, illustrating that daily smoking is not necessary for TUD.

目的:很少有关于美国烟草使用障碍(TUD)患病率的全国性估计数据,而且大多数试验只评估日常吸烟而非TUD。我们研究了成年人中患有与未患有烟草使用障碍的吸烟率及其变化趋势:数据来自 2010-2021 年全国药物使用和健康调查(n = 483,982 人),这是一个具有美国代表性的横断面数据集。根据既定定义(如 DSM-5 症状)创建了 TUD 综合变量。过去 30 天吸烟、每天吸烟(30/30 天)和非每天吸烟的加权吸烟率(结果:过去 30 天吸烟率为 30%,每天吸烟率为 30%,非每天吸烟率为 30%):2021 年,过去 30 天总体吸烟率为 17%;11% 报告每天吸烟,6% 报告非每天吸烟。只有 1%的人报告在不使用宫颈管的情况下每天吸烟,而 10%的人报告在使用宫颈管的情况下每天吸烟。2%的人群报告在不使用 TUD 的情况下非每天吸烟,4%的人群报告在使用 TUD 的情况下非每天吸烟。从 2010 年到 2021 年,每天吸食 TUD 以及非每天吸食和不吸食 TUD 的人数明显减少(所有 P 均小于 .001)。报告TUD症状(与未报告TUD症状)的美国成年人更有可能年龄较大、为白人、收入较低、受教育程度较低以及患有药物使用障碍:结论:患有 TUD 的每日吸烟率是未患有 TUD 的每日吸烟率的 10 倍。非每日吸烟的美国成年人中,报告患有 TUD 的人数是未患有 TUD 的人数的两倍,这说明每日吸烟并非 TUD 的必要条件。
{"title":"Prevalence and Trends in Cigarette Smoking With and Without Tobacco Use Disorder Among Adults in the United States: 2010-2021.","authors":"Joanna M Streck, Maria A Parker, Raul Cruz, Rachel L Rosen, Timothy B Baker, Megan E Piper, Andrea H Weinberger","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Few national estimates are available on the prevalence of tobacco use disorder (TUD) in the United States (US), and most trials exclusively assess daily smoking rather than TUD. We examined the prevalence and trends in cigarette smoking with vs without TUD among adults.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Data came from the 2010-2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 483,982), a cross sectional, US representative dataset. A TUD composite variable was created based on established definitions (eg, <i>DSM-5</i> symptoms). Weighted prevalence of past 30-day cigarette smoking, daily smoking (30/30 days) and nondaily smoking (<30/30 days) with and without TUD, was calculated annually.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In 2021, the prevalence of past 30- day overall cigarette smoking was 17%; 11% reported daily cigarette smoking, whereas 6% reported nondaily cigarette smoking. Only 1% of the population reported daily smoking without TUD, whereas 10% reported daily smoking with TUD. Two percent of the population reported nondaily smoking without TUD, and 4% of the population reported nondaily smoking with TUD. Daily smoking with TUD and nondaily smoking with and without TUD decreased significantly from 2010 to 2021 (all <i>P</i>'s < .001). US adults reporting TUD symptoms (vs not) were more likely to be older, identify as White, have lower income and less education, and have a substance use disorder.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The prevalence of daily cigarette smoking with TUD was 10× higher than the prevalence of daily cigarette smoking without TUD. Twice as many US adults with nondaily smoking reported TUD than no TUD, illustrating that daily smoking is not necessary for TUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extreme Dysphoria of Pregnancy: A Distinct Syndrome Warranting Attention? 妊娠极端焦虑症:值得关注的独特综合症?
IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23com15238
Marlene P Freeman
{"title":"Extreme Dysphoria of Pregnancy: A Distinct Syndrome Warranting Attention?","authors":"Marlene P Freeman","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23com15238","DOIUrl":"10.4088/JCP.23com15238","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacogenomic Characterization of Childbearing-Aged Individuals With Mood Disorders in a Tertiary Care Perinatal Mental Health Clinic. 三级护理围产期心理健康门诊中患有情绪障碍的育龄个体的药物基因组特征。
IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23m15024
Jessica L W Mayer, Hannah K Betcher, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Amy Yang, Alfred L George, Tatiana Abramova, Catherine S Stika, Katherine L Wisner, Crystal T Clark, Jacqueline Gollan

Objective: The effectiveness of antidepressant treatment for mood disorders is often limited by either a poor response or the emergence of adverse effects. These complications often necessitate multiple drug trials. This clinical challenge intensifies during pregnancy, when medications must be selected to improve the likelihood of response and optimize reproductive outcomes. We determined the distribution of common pharmacogenetic variants, metabolizer phenotypes, past medication responses, and side effects in childbearing-aged individuals seeking treatment in a tertiary care perinatal mental health clinic.

Methods: Sixty treatment-seeking women (based on sex at birth) with DSM-5- defined bipolar disorder (n = 28) or major depressive disorder (n = 32) provided DNA samples and completed psychiatric diagnostic and severity assessments between April 2014 and December 2017. Samples were genotyped for single-nucleotide variants in drug metabolizing enzyme genes of commonly prescribed antidepressants (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, and 3A5), and the frequency of normative metabolizer status was compared to reference populations data from Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. The Antidepressant Treatment History Form was used to record historic medication trials and side effects.

Results: A significantly greater proportion of extensive metabolizers for CYP2B6 was observed in the study population when compared to CPIC population frequency databases in Caucasians (0.64 vs 0.43 [95% CI: 0.49-0.76]; P value = .006) and African Americans (0.71 vs 0.33 [95% CI: 0.29-0.96]; P value = .045). No significant association was found between metabolizer phenotype and the likelihood of a medication side effect.

Conclusion: Pharmacogenomic testing may have value for personalized prescribing in individuals capable of or considering pregnancy.

目的:抗抑郁剂治疗情绪障碍的效果往往因反应不佳或出现不良反应而受到限制。这些并发症往往需要进行多次药物试验。这种临床挑战在怀孕期间更为严峻,因为此时必须选择药物来提高反应的可能性并优化生殖结果。我们确定了在一家三级护理围产期精神健康诊所寻求治疗的育龄期患者的常见药物基因变异、代谢表型、既往药物反应和副作用的分布情况:在2014年4月至2017年12月期间,60名患有DSM-5定义的双相情感障碍(n = 28)或重度抑郁障碍(n = 32)的寻求治疗的女性(基于出生时的性别)提供了DNA样本,并完成了精神病诊断和严重程度评估。对样本进行了常用处方抗抑郁药(细胞色素 P450 [CYP] 1A2、2B6、2C9、2C19、2D6、3A4 和 3A5)药物代谢酶基因单核苷酸变异的基因分型,并将正常代谢状态的频率与临床药理遗传学实施联盟(CPIC)指南中的参考人群数据进行了比较。抗抑郁药物治疗史表格用于记录历史用药试验和副作用:结果:与CPIC人群频率数据库相比,研究人群中白种人(0.64 vs 0.43 [95% CI: 0.49-0.76];P值 = .006)和非裔美国人(0.71 vs 0.33 [95% CI: 0.29-0.96];P值 = .045)的CYP2B6广泛代谢者比例明显更高。代谢物表型与药物副作用的可能性之间没有发现明显的关联:药物基因组学检测可能对有怀孕能力或考虑怀孕的人的个性化处方有价值。
{"title":"Pharmacogenomic Characterization of Childbearing-Aged Individuals With Mood Disorders in a Tertiary Care Perinatal Mental Health Clinic.","authors":"Jessica L W Mayer, Hannah K Betcher, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Amy Yang, Alfred L George, Tatiana Abramova, Catherine S Stika, Katherine L Wisner, Crystal T Clark, Jacqueline Gollan","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> The effectiveness of antidepressant treatment for mood disorders is often limited by either a poor response or the emergence of adverse effects. These complications often necessitate multiple drug trials. This clinical challenge intensifies during pregnancy, when medications must be selected to improve the likelihood of response and optimize reproductive outcomes. We determined the distribution of common pharmacogenetic variants, metabolizer phenotypes, past medication responses, and side effects in childbearing-aged individuals seeking treatment in a tertiary care perinatal mental health clinic.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Sixty treatment-seeking women (based on sex at birth) with <i>DSM-5-</i> defined bipolar disorder (n = 28) or major depressive disorder (n = 32) provided DNA samples and completed psychiatric diagnostic and severity assessments between April 2014 and December 2017. Samples were genotyped for single-nucleotide variants in drug metabolizing enzyme genes of commonly prescribed antidepressants (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, and 3A5), and the frequency of normative metabolizer status was compared to reference populations data from Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. The Antidepressant Treatment History Form was used to record historic medication trials and side effects.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A significantly greater proportion of extensive metabolizers for CYP2B6 was observed in the study population when compared to CPIC population frequency databases in Caucasians (0.64 vs 0.43 [95% CI: 0.49-0.76]; <i>P</i> value = .006) and African Americans (0.71 vs 0.33 [95% CI: 0.29-0.96]; <i>P</i> value = .045). No significant association was found between metabolizer phenotype and the likelihood of a medication side effect.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Pharmacogenomic testing may have value for personalized prescribing in individuals capable of or considering pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's Gender Got to Do With It: Accounting for Differences in Incident Guideline Discordant Prescribing for PTSD Among Women and Men Veterans. 性别有什么关系?女性退伍军人与男性退伍军人创伤后应激障碍事件指导原则不一致处方差异的解释》(What gender Got to Do With It: Accounting for Differences in Incident Guideline Discordant Prescribing for PTSD Among Women and Men Veterans.
IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23m15174
Kenda R Stewart Steffensmeier, Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Nancy Bernardy, Daniel Ball, Nicole L Johnson, Jennifer Van Tiem, Brian C Lund

Objectives: Women veterans are more likely than men veterans to receive medications that Department of Veterans Affairs clinical practice guidelines recommend against to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To understand this difference, we examined potential confounders in incident prescribing of guideline discordant medications (GDMs) in veterans with PTSD.

Methods: Veterans receiving care for PTSD during 2020 were identified using Veterans Health Administration administrative data. PTSD diagnosis was established by the presence of at least 1 ICD-10 coded outpatient encounter or inpatient hospitalization during the calendar year 2020. Incident GDM prescribing was assessed during 2021, including benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, select anticonvulsants, and select antidepressants. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the difference in risk for GDM initiation between men and women, adjusted for patient, prescriber, and facility-level covariates, and to identify key confounding variables.

Results: Of 704,699 veterans with PTSD, 16.9% of women and 10.1% of men initiated a GDM, an increased risk of 67% for women [relative risk (RR) = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.65-1.70]. After adjustment, the gender difference decreased to 1.22 (95% CI, 1.20-1.24) in a fully specified model. Three key confounding variables were identified: bipolar disorder (RR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.57-1.63), age (<40 years: RR = 1.20 [1.18-1.22]; 40-54 years: RR = 1.13 [1.11-1.16]; ≥65 years: RR = 0.64 [0.62-0.65]), and count of distinct psychiatric medications prescribed in the prior year (RR = 1.14; 1.13-1.14).

Conclusions: Women veterans with PTSD were 67% more likely to initiate a GDM, where more than half of this effect was explained by bipolar disorder, age, and prior psychiatric medication. After adjustment, women veterans remained at 22% greater risk for an incident GDM, suggesting that other factors remain unidentified and warrant further investigation.

目的:女性退伍军人比男性退伍军人更有可能接受退伍军人事务部临床实践指南所建议的药物来治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。为了了解这一差异,我们研究了患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人在开具与指南不一致的药物(GDM)时可能存在的混杂因素:我们使用退伍军人健康管理局的行政数据对 2020 年期间接受创伤后应激障碍治疗的退伍军人进行了识别。在 2020 日历年内至少有一次 ICD-10 编码的门诊就诊或住院治疗,即可确诊为创伤后应激障碍。对 2021 年期间发生的 GDM 处方进行了评估,包括苯二氮卓类药物、抗精神病药物、部分抗惊厥药物和部分抗抑郁药物。采用对数二叉回归法估算男性和女性启动 GDM 的风险差异,并对患者、处方者和医疗机构层面的协变量进行调整,同时确定关键的混杂变量:在 704,699 名患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人中,16.9% 的女性和 10.1% 的男性开始了 GDM,女性的风险增加了 67% [相对风险 (RR) = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.65-1.70]。经过调整后,在完全特定的模型中,性别差异降至 1.22(95% CI,1.20-1.24)。研究发现了三个关键的混杂变量:双相情感障碍(RR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.57-1.63)、年龄(结论:患有创伤后应激障碍的女性退伍军人占退伍军人总数的 70%)、罹患创伤后应激障碍的女性退伍军人占罹患创伤后应激障碍女性退伍军人总数的 70%:患有创伤后应激障碍的女性退伍军人发起 GDM 的可能性要高出 67%,而这一影响的一半以上是由躁郁症、年龄和之前的精神病药物治疗造成的。经过调整后,女性退伍军人发生 GDM 的风险仍然高出 22%,这表明其他因素仍未被发现,需要进一步调查。
{"title":"What's Gender Got to Do With It: Accounting for Differences in Incident Guideline Discordant Prescribing for PTSD Among Women and Men Veterans.","authors":"Kenda R Stewart Steffensmeier, Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Nancy Bernardy, Daniel Ball, Nicole L Johnson, Jennifer Van Tiem, Brian C Lund","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Women veterans are more likely than men veterans to receive medications that Department of Veterans Affairs clinical practice guidelines recommend against to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To understand this difference, we examined potential confounders in incident prescribing of guideline discordant medications (GDMs) in veterans with PTSD.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Veterans receiving care for PTSD during 2020 were identified using Veterans Health Administration administrative data. PTSD diagnosis was established by the presence of at least 1 <i>ICD-10</i> coded outpatient encounter or inpatient hospitalization during the calendar year 2020. Incident GDM prescribing was assessed during 2021, including benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, select anticonvulsants, and select antidepressants. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the difference in risk for GDM initiation between men and women, adjusted for patient, prescriber, and facility-level covariates, and to identify key confounding variables.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Of 704,699 veterans with PTSD, 16.9% of women and 10.1% of men initiated a GDM, an increased risk of 67% for women [relative risk (RR) = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.65-1.70]. After adjustment, the gender difference decreased to 1.22 (95% CI, 1.20-1.24) in a fully specified model. Three key confounding variables were identified: bipolar disorder (RR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.57-1.63), age (<40 years: RR = 1.20 [1.18-1.22]; 40-54 years: RR = 1.13 [1.11-1.16]; ≥65 years: RR = 0.64 [0.62-0.65]), and count of distinct psychiatric medications prescribed in the prior year (RR = 1.14; 1.13-1.14).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Women veterans with PTSD were 67% more likely to initiate a GDM, where more than half of this effect was explained by bipolar disorder, age, and prior psychiatric medication. After adjustment, women veterans remained at 22% greater risk for an incident GDM, suggesting that other factors remain unidentified and warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141248811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using THC Edible Gummies for Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia: Reply to Goldman and Markov. 使用 THC 食用软糖治疗痴呆症的行为症状:答复戈德曼和马尔科夫
IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.24lr15255a
Erin K Zahradnik, Cristian Hernandez
{"title":"Using THC Edible Gummies for Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia: Reply to Goldman and Markov.","authors":"Erin K Zahradnik, Cristian Hernandez","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24lr15255a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24lr15255a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141248804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1