Pub Date : 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02506-w
Jungyoon Kim, Hongying Daisy Dai, Tzeyu Michaud, Sachi Verma, Keyonna M King, John W Ewing, Grace Mabiala-Maye, Paul Estabrooks
Colorectal cancer (CRC) awareness and screening rates are still low in African Americans (AAs), especially for those who do not have regular access to health care. We established a multi-sector community partnership between academia, health system, cancer advocacy, and local county treasurer's office (CTO), to test a pilot CRC screening intervention using a tailored educational brochure and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Participants were recruited at a local CTO in an urban midwestern region. Once eligible, participants were assigned to 2-by-2 intervention arms by educational strategy (brochure vs. no brochure) and FIT provision strategy (direct provision by onsite staff vs. indirect provision via phone/online request). We compared the effect of different strategies on FIT return rates. Of 1500 individuals approached, 212 were eligible for the study. The final sample consisted of 209 participants who were predominantly men (57%) and AAs (85%). No differences were found in the return rates by educational brochure (24% [brochure] vs. 23% [no brochure]; p = 0.82). In regard to FIT provision strategy, direct FIT provision yielded higher return rates than indirect provision (31% vs. 15%; p = 0.01). When the four groups were compared, direct provision with education brochure yielded the highest return rates (33.9%), followed by direct provision only (27.5%), indirect provision only (18%), and indirect provision with a brochure (12.2%). For community-based CRC screening intervention using stool-based test, the direct provision of FIT kits with educational brochure outperforms the other three strategies.
非裔美国人(AAs)对结肠直肠癌(CRC)的认识和筛查率仍然很低,尤其是那些无法定期获得医疗保健服务的非裔美国人。我们在学术界、卫生系统、癌症宣传机构和当地县财政局(CTO)之间建立了一个多部门社区合作关系,利用定制的教育手册和粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)测试一项试验性的 CRC 筛查干预措施。参与者在中西部城市地区的当地 CTO 处招募。符合条件后,参与者按教育策略(宣传册与无宣传册)和 FIT 提供策略(现场工作人员直接提供与通过电话/在线请求间接提供)被分配到 2×2 的干预组。我们比较了不同策略对 FIT 返回率的影响。在接触的 1500 人中,有 212 人符合研究条件。最终的样本包括 209 名参与者,他们主要是男性(57%)和机甲族(85%)。教育小册子的回收率没有差异(24% [小册子] vs. 23% [无小册子];p = 0.82)。就提供 FIT 的策略而言,直接提供 FIT 的回访率高于间接提供(31% 对 15%;p = 0.01)。在对四组进行比较时,直接提供并附带教育手册的回访率最高(33.9%),其次是仅直接提供(27.5%)、仅间接提供(18%)和间接提供并附带手册(12.2%)。就使用粪便检验的社区儿童癌筛查干预而言,直接提供 FIT 套件和教育手册的效果优于其他三种策略。
{"title":"Leveraging Multi-Sectoral Partnership for Colorectal Cancer Education and Screening in the African American Community: A Protocol and Preliminary Results.","authors":"Jungyoon Kim, Hongying Daisy Dai, Tzeyu Michaud, Sachi Verma, Keyonna M King, John W Ewing, Grace Mabiala-Maye, Paul Estabrooks","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02506-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02506-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) awareness and screening rates are still low in African Americans (AAs), especially for those who do not have regular access to health care. We established a multi-sector community partnership between academia, health system, cancer advocacy, and local county treasurer's office (CTO), to test a pilot CRC screening intervention using a tailored educational brochure and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Participants were recruited at a local CTO in an urban midwestern region. Once eligible, participants were assigned to 2-by-2 intervention arms by educational strategy (brochure vs. no brochure) and FIT provision strategy (direct provision by onsite staff vs. indirect provision via phone/online request). We compared the effect of different strategies on FIT return rates. Of 1500 individuals approached, 212 were eligible for the study. The final sample consisted of 209 participants who were predominantly men (57%) and AAs (85%). No differences were found in the return rates by educational brochure (24% [brochure] vs. 23% [no brochure]; p = 0.82). In regard to FIT provision strategy, direct FIT provision yielded higher return rates than indirect provision (31% vs. 15%; p = 0.01). When the four groups were compared, direct provision with education brochure yielded the highest return rates (33.9%), followed by direct provision only (27.5%), indirect provision only (18%), and indirect provision with a brochure (12.2%). For community-based CRC screening intervention using stool-based test, the direct provision of FIT kits with educational brochure outperforms the other three strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02507-9
Amrit Baral, Bria-Necole A. Diggs, Anurag Aka, Renessa Williams, Nicholas Hernandez Ortega, Ranya Marrakchi El Fellah, Jessica Y. Islam, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Frank J. Penedo, Denise C. Vidot
Cannabis use among cancer patients for managing treatment-related symptoms is increasing, yet little is known about patterns in patient-provider communication. This study examines demographic differences in cannabis use communication at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. The analysis included cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years who self-reported current cannabis use (past 30 days) and had visited Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center within the past 5 years (N = 226). Data were collected via an anonymous electronic survey on REDCap. Responses on patients’ disclosure of cannabis use to cancer doctor/care team and their comfort in discussing cannabis were analyzed. Chi-squared/Fisher’s exact tests and t-tests were applied. Logistic regression estimated the associations between age and stage of cancer treatment with patients’ comfort in discussing cannabis use with cancer doctor (oncologist). The sample was 51.8% male and 39.4% Hispanic (mean age, 45.9 years (SD = 15.1)); 41.1% were aged 20–39 years, 43.8% were undergoing treatment, and 35.4% were in follow-up/had finished treatment. Over half (50.4%) did not disclose cannabis use to their cancer doctor/care team. Non-disclosers were more often younger (20–39 years) than disclosers (52.6% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.01). Most patients (72.5%) felt comfortable discussing cannabis use with their oncologist; however, younger patients (20–39 years) were more often uncomfortable (40.8%). Logistic regression showed newly diagnosed patients had lower odds (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.12–0.98) of comfort discussing cannabis compared to those in follow-up/finished treatment. Younger patients (20–39 years) also had lower odds (aOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03–0.40) of feeling comfortable discussing cannabis compared to older patients (≥ 60 years). Age and treatment stage significantly impact the cannabis use disclosure and comfort in discussing it with cancer doctor/care team. These findings underscore the importance of considering age-related factors and treatment status when addressing cannabis use discussions within oncology setting.
{"title":"Experiences and Comfort of Young Cancer Patients Discussing Cannabis with Their Providers: Insights from a Survey at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center","authors":"Amrit Baral, Bria-Necole A. Diggs, Anurag Aka, Renessa Williams, Nicholas Hernandez Ortega, Ranya Marrakchi El Fellah, Jessica Y. Islam, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Frank J. Penedo, Denise C. Vidot","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02507-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02507-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cannabis use among cancer patients for managing treatment-related symptoms is increasing, yet little is known about patterns in patient-provider communication. This study examines demographic differences in cannabis use communication at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center. The analysis included cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years who self-reported current cannabis use (past 30 days) and had visited Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center within the past 5 years (<i>N</i> = 226). Data were collected via an anonymous electronic survey on REDCap. Responses on patients’ disclosure of cannabis use to cancer doctor/care team and their comfort in discussing cannabis were analyzed. Chi-squared/Fisher’s exact tests and <i>t</i>-tests were applied. Logistic regression estimated the associations between age and stage of cancer treatment with patients’ comfort in discussing cannabis use with cancer doctor (oncologist). The sample was 51.8% male and 39.4% Hispanic (mean age, 45.9 years (SD = 15.1)); 41.1% were aged 20–39 years, 43.8% were undergoing treatment, and 35.4% were in follow-up/had finished treatment. Over half (50.4%) did not disclose cannabis use to their cancer doctor/care team. Non-disclosers were more often younger (20–39 years) than disclosers (52.6% vs. 29.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Most patients (72.5%) felt comfortable discussing cannabis use with their oncologist; however, younger patients (20–39 years) were more often uncomfortable (40.8%). Logistic regression showed newly diagnosed patients had lower odds (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.12–0.98) of comfort discussing cannabis compared to those in follow-up/finished treatment. Younger patients (20–39 years) also had lower odds (aOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03–0.40) of feeling comfortable discussing cannabis compared to older patients (≥ 60 years). Age and treatment stage significantly impact the cannabis use disclosure and comfort in discussing it with cancer doctor/care team. These findings underscore the importance of considering age-related factors and treatment status when addressing cannabis use discussions within oncology setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142265448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-16DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02500-2
Maria Gabriela Rosa Sangoi, Yasmin Muniz Dias, Natan Katz, Fernanda Visioli, Pantelis Varvaki Rados, Manoela Domingues Martins, Laura de Campos Hildebrand, Vinicius Coelho Carrard
Dentists play a pivotal role in the early detection of oral cancer. Consequently, they are expected to possess the knowledge and the capability to recognize the features of this disease. The objective of the study is to evaluate dentists from different regions of Brazil regarding their level of knowledge and self-confidence regarding oral cancer. An online self-administered questionnaire was completed by dentists across Brazil registered on the TelessaúdeRS-UFRGS platform. This questionnaire encompassed inquiries related to knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding oral cancer. A total of 1291 dentists from all regions of the country responded to the questionnaire. The majority of participants were females (75.5%), with an average age of 36.3 years, predominantly from the public sector (46.8%). A reasonable level of knowledge regarding oral cancer was observed among dentists, although 48.6% of these professionals felt uncertain about diagnosis procedures. Dentists less than 8 years since graduation perceived themselves as more prepared to perform oral cancer diagnoses than those with more experience. Around 55% of participants had never performed a biopsy. Based on the obtained results, it is concluded that continuous education activities focused on oral cancer and implementing practical training during undergraduate studies are imperative. These strategies can improve professionals’ self-confidence and diagnostic accuracy, thereby facilitating early disease diagnosis and, consequently, a more favorable prognosis.
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Perceptions of Brazilian Dentists About Oral Cancer","authors":"Maria Gabriela Rosa Sangoi, Yasmin Muniz Dias, Natan Katz, Fernanda Visioli, Pantelis Varvaki Rados, Manoela Domingues Martins, Laura de Campos Hildebrand, Vinicius Coelho Carrard","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02500-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02500-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dentists play a pivotal role in the early detection of oral cancer. Consequently, they are expected to possess the knowledge and the capability to recognize the features of this disease. The objective of the study is to evaluate dentists from different regions of Brazil regarding their level of knowledge and self-confidence regarding oral cancer. An online self-administered questionnaire was completed by dentists across Brazil registered on the TelessaúdeRS-UFRGS platform. This questionnaire encompassed inquiries related to knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding oral cancer. A total of 1291 dentists from all regions of the country responded to the questionnaire. The majority of participants were females (75.5%), with an average age of 36.3 years, predominantly from the public sector (46.8%). A reasonable level of knowledge regarding oral cancer was observed among dentists, although 48.6% of these professionals felt uncertain about diagnosis procedures. Dentists less than 8 years since graduation perceived themselves as more prepared to perform oral cancer diagnoses than those with more experience. Around 55% of participants had never performed a biopsy. Based on the obtained results, it is concluded that continuous education activities focused on oral cancer and implementing practical training during undergraduate studies are imperative. These strategies can improve professionals’ self-confidence and diagnostic accuracy, thereby facilitating early disease diagnosis and, consequently, a more favorable prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142265449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The objective of this study was to understand gynecological cancer (GC) survivors’ and their informal caregivers’ perceptions about the usability of an educational resource to support their transition from primary cancer treatment into surveillance and/or recovery. After developing an empirical- and experiential-informed educational resource, we used a semi-structured questioning process to understand GC survivors and their caregivers’ perceptions about its usability. Data were collected via online focus groups or 1:1 interviews that were audio recorded and transcribed. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Ten participants who were survivors or informal caregivers of cervical, ovarian, or uterine/endometrial cancer participated in two rounds of data collection. We grouped qualitative data into two themes: (1) reputable, relevant, and accessible education reduces uncertainty and promotes connection, and (2) individualized delivery of education provided by trusted cancer clinicians. The transition from treatment to surveillance is a challenging time for which reputable, relevant, and accessible educational resources are useful to facilitate an understanding about and self-management of survivorship-related concerns. Survivors and caregivers look to clinicians to provide reputable education to address their needs. This education should be diverse in content and referred to repeatedly throughout the cancer trajectory.
{"title":"From Treatment to Recovery: Gynecological Survivors’ and Caregivers’ Perspectives About the Usability of an Educational Resource","authors":"Jacqueline Galica, Amina Silva, Janet Giroux, Janet Jull, Stuart Peacock, Josée-Lyne Ethier, Hugh Langely, Christine Maheu, Debora Stark, Rupa Patel, Karyn Perry, Julie Francis, Kardi Kennedy, Kathleen Robb","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02504-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02504-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to understand gynecological cancer (GC) survivors’ and their informal caregivers’ perceptions about the usability of an educational resource to support their transition from primary cancer treatment into surveillance and/or recovery. After developing an empirical- and experiential-informed educational resource, we used a semi-structured questioning process to understand GC survivors and their caregivers’ perceptions about its usability. Data were collected via online focus groups or 1:1 interviews that were audio recorded and transcribed. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Ten participants who were survivors or informal caregivers of cervical, ovarian, or uterine/endometrial cancer participated in two rounds of data collection. We grouped qualitative data into two themes: (1) reputable, relevant, and accessible education reduces uncertainty and promotes connection, and (2) individualized delivery of education provided by trusted cancer clinicians. The transition from treatment to surveillance is a challenging time for which reputable, relevant, and accessible educational resources are useful to facilitate an understanding about and self-management of survivorship-related concerns. Survivors and caregivers look to clinicians to provide reputable education to address their needs. This education should be diverse in content and referred to repeatedly throughout the cancer trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142265457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02501-1
Juliet Bonnah, Michelle S. Williams
Cervical cancer is currently the second leading cause of cancer death among women in Ghana. Previous studies have identified lack of awareness, lack of perceived susceptibility, and stigmatizing beliefs as significant sociocultural barriers to cervical cancer screening among Ghanaian women. The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability of evidence and theory-based, culturally relevant cervical cancer education intervention materials among Ghanaian healthcare providers. Central-location intercept questionnaires were completed by providers (n = 60) in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. Providers reviewed a poster, an audio message, and a brief educational video. The variables assessed included the reaction to the materials, the ability of the materials to attract the attention of the intended audience, the ability of the materials to communicate the main point of the cancer education message, and the reaction to cultural characteristics of the materials. The mean age of the providers (n = 60) was 30.6 years, and the majority (70.8%) were females. Most of the providers had a positive general reaction to the poster, audio message, and video. The majority found the materials to be motivating. Most of the providers found the information in the materials to be attention-getting, interesting, useful, direct/to the point, and related to someone like them. Very few providers (5%) indicated that they were confused by the images or messages used in the materials. The culturally relevant cervical cancer education materials were acceptable to Ghanaian healthcare providers. These materials may be effective in shared decision-making for cervical cancer screening.
{"title":"An Assessment of the Acceptability of Cervical Cancer Education Intervention Materials Among Healthcare Providers in Ghana","authors":"Juliet Bonnah, Michelle S. Williams","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02501-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02501-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cervical cancer is currently the second leading cause of cancer death among women in Ghana. Previous studies have identified lack of awareness, lack of perceived susceptibility, and stigmatizing beliefs as significant sociocultural barriers to cervical cancer screening among Ghanaian women. The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability of evidence and theory-based, culturally relevant cervical cancer education intervention materials among Ghanaian healthcare providers. Central-location intercept questionnaires were completed by providers (<i>n</i> = 60) in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. Providers reviewed a poster, an audio message, and a brief educational video. The variables assessed included the reaction to the materials, the ability of the materials to attract the attention of the intended audience, the ability of the materials to communicate the main point of the cancer education message, and the reaction to cultural characteristics of the materials. The mean age of the providers (<i>n</i> = 60) was 30.6 years, and the majority (70.8%) were females. Most of the providers had a positive general reaction to the poster, audio message, and video. The majority found the materials to be motivating. Most of the providers found the information in the materials to be attention-getting, interesting, useful, direct/to the point, and related to someone like them. Very few providers (5%) indicated that they were confused by the images or messages used in the materials. The culturally relevant cervical cancer education materials were acceptable to Ghanaian healthcare providers. These materials may be effective in shared decision-making for cervical cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142219611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02503-z
R. Baddou, A. Yacouti, M. Guennouni, A. El got, A. Benider, M. Mouallif
In Morocco, cervical cancer screening rate is still low, which determines the need to adopt new screening approaches. Vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing is one of these strategies. Anticipating changes in screening plans for CC, we would like to present to health authorities a global view about the acceptability and preference of vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing among a population of Moroccan women. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the acceptability and preference of vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing among a population of Moroccan women. A cross-sectional study surveyed 400 Moroccan women aged between 25 and 65 years, who are recruited from various healthcare facilities in three Moroccan regions, between March and November 2022. Data were collected via interviews, using a questionnaire. Among the 400 participants, 380 (95%) were ready to undergo a vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing. Among participants who expressed their willingness to perform this test, 295 (73.6%) prefer to carry out it at home. A decreased likelihood of HPV self-sampling was determined by belief that only women with vaginal discharge or bleeding need to be screened. Age, marital status, perceived severity of CC, practice CC screening, and perceived self-efficacy were identified as the main factors influencing the preference for home based vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing. Vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing is an alternative option that could overcome a set of screening barriers defined in the Moroccan context, in order to increase CC screening coverage.
{"title":"Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, Acceptability and Preference of Home-based HPV Self-Sampling Among a Population of Moroccan Women","authors":"R. Baddou, A. Yacouti, M. Guennouni, A. El got, A. Benider, M. Mouallif","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02503-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02503-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Morocco, cervical cancer screening rate is still low, which determines the need to adopt new screening approaches. Vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing is one of these strategies. Anticipating changes in screening plans for CC, we would like to present to health authorities a global view about the acceptability and preference of vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing among a population of Moroccan women. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the acceptability and preference of vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing among a population of Moroccan women. A cross-sectional study surveyed 400 Moroccan women aged between 25 and 65 years, who are recruited from various healthcare facilities in three Moroccan regions, between March and November 2022. Data were collected via interviews, using a questionnaire. Among the 400 participants, 380 (95%) were ready to undergo a vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing. Among participants who expressed their willingness to perform this test, 295 (73.6%) prefer to carry out it at home. A decreased likelihood of HPV self-sampling was determined by belief that only women with vaginal discharge or bleeding need to be screened. Age, marital status, perceived severity of CC, practice CC screening, and perceived self-efficacy were identified as the main factors influencing the preference for home based vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing. Vaginal self-sampling for HPV testing is an alternative option that could overcome a set of screening barriers defined in the Moroccan context, in order to increase CC screening coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142219612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-07DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02502-0
Yanqiu Chen, Zhen Sun, Wenjie Lin, Ziwei Xv, Qichen Su
The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of AI-assisted training and conventional human training in clinical practice. This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in five national-level residency training hospitals. Residents from five hospitals participated, divided into three groups: conventional training (Group A), conventional plus specialty training (Group B), and conventional plus AI-assisted training (Group C). The content of the training was ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules. The training lasted for 18 months, and the three groups of participants were phase-tested every 3 months to compare the effect of the training. The diagnostic accuracy of all three groups gradually increased with increasing training time. Among the three groups, groups B and C had higher accuracy than group A (P < .001), and there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P = .64). Over the training period, diagnostic confidence increased in all groups. Negative activating emotions decreased significantly over time in all groups (95% CI, - 0.81 to - 0.37; P < .001), while positive activating emotions increased significantly (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.53; P < .001). Current research shows that all three approaches are viable for training radiology residents. Furthermore, the AI-assisted approach had no negative emotional impact on the trainees, suggesting that integrating AI into radiology training programs could provide a reliable and effective means of achieving the educational goals of medical education.
本研究旨在比较人工智能辅助培训和传统人工培训在临床实践中的效果。这是一项多中心、随机对照临床试验,在五家国家级住院医师培训医院进行。五家医院的住院医师参加了试验,分为三组:常规培训组(A 组)、常规加专科培训组(B 组)和常规加人工智能辅助培训组(C 组)。培训内容为甲状腺结节的超声诊断。培训为期 18 个月,每 3 个月对三组学员进行一次阶段性测试,以比较培训效果。随着培训时间的延长,三组学员的诊断准确率都逐渐提高。在三组学员中,B 组和 C 组的诊断准确率高于 A 组(P<0.05)。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Radiology Residents: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yanqiu Chen, Zhen Sun, Wenjie Lin, Ziwei Xv, Qichen Su","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02502-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02502-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of AI-assisted training and conventional human training in clinical practice. This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in five national-level residency training hospitals. Residents from five hospitals participated, divided into three groups: conventional training (Group A), conventional plus specialty training (Group B), and conventional plus AI-assisted training (Group C). The content of the training was ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules. The training lasted for 18 months, and the three groups of participants were phase-tested every 3 months to compare the effect of the training. The diagnostic accuracy of all three groups gradually increased with increasing training time. Among the three groups, groups B and C had higher accuracy than group A (P < .001), and there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P = .64). Over the training period, diagnostic confidence increased in all groups. Negative activating emotions decreased significantly over time in all groups (95% CI, - 0.81 to - 0.37; P < .001), while positive activating emotions increased significantly (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.53; P < .001). Current research shows that all three approaches are viable for training radiology residents. Furthermore, the AI-assisted approach had no negative emotional impact on the trainees, suggesting that integrating AI into radiology training programs could provide a reliable and effective means of achieving the educational goals of medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02493-y
Ursula Martinez, Thomas H Brandon, Cherell Cottrell-Daniels, Colleen M McBride, Graham W Warren, Cathy D Meade, Amanda M Palmer, Vani N Simmons
Smoking by cancer patients impairs treatment outcomes and prognoses across cancer types. Previous research shows greater smoking cessation motivation and quit rates among patients with cancers strongly linked to smoking (i.e., thoracic, head and neck) compared to other cancer types (e.g., melanoma). Therefore, there is a need to increase cessation motivation among patients with malignancies less commonly associated with smoking. Yet, no targeted educational materials exist to meet this information gap. This manuscript describes the development of theory-based self-help educational materials, targeted by cancer type, to increase motivation to quit smoking among patients with cancers not widely perceived as smoking-related (i.e., breast, melanoma, bladder, colorectal, gynecological). Using a three-phase iterative process, we first conducted in-depth interviews with our intended audience (N = 18) to identify information needs and nuanced content. Themes included patients' low knowledge about the connection between smoking and cancer etiology and outcomes; negative affect, habit, dependence, and weight gain as quitting barriers; and a preference for positive and non-judgmental content. Second, content creation was based on interview findings, the scientific literature, and framed following the teachable moment model. Last, learner verification and revisions via interviews with 22 patients assessed suitability of draft materials, with generally favorable responses. Resulting edits included tailoring cost savings to the cancer context, explaining cessation medications, and increasing appeal by improving the diversity (e.g., race) of the individuals in the photographs. The final booklets are low cost, easy to disseminate, and-pending efficacy studies-may expand smoking cessation to a wider spectrum of cancer patients.
{"title":"Development of an Intervention Targeted to Patients with Cancers Not Typically Perceived as Smoking-Related.","authors":"Ursula Martinez, Thomas H Brandon, Cherell Cottrell-Daniels, Colleen M McBride, Graham W Warren, Cathy D Meade, Amanda M Palmer, Vani N Simmons","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02493-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02493-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smoking by cancer patients impairs treatment outcomes and prognoses across cancer types. Previous research shows greater smoking cessation motivation and quit rates among patients with cancers strongly linked to smoking (i.e., thoracic, head and neck) compared to other cancer types (e.g., melanoma). Therefore, there is a need to increase cessation motivation among patients with malignancies less commonly associated with smoking. Yet, no targeted educational materials exist to meet this information gap. This manuscript describes the development of theory-based self-help educational materials, targeted by cancer type, to increase motivation to quit smoking among patients with cancers not widely perceived as smoking-related (i.e., breast, melanoma, bladder, colorectal, gynecological). Using a three-phase iterative process, we first conducted in-depth interviews with our intended audience (N = 18) to identify information needs and nuanced content. Themes included patients' low knowledge about the connection between smoking and cancer etiology and outcomes; negative affect, habit, dependence, and weight gain as quitting barriers; and a preference for positive and non-judgmental content. Second, content creation was based on interview findings, the scientific literature, and framed following the teachable moment model. Last, learner verification and revisions via interviews with 22 patients assessed suitability of draft materials, with generally favorable responses. Resulting edits included tailoring cost savings to the cancer context, explaining cessation medications, and increasing appeal by improving the diversity (e.g., race) of the individuals in the photographs. The final booklets are low cost, easy to disseminate, and-pending efficacy studies-may expand smoking cessation to a wider spectrum of cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02497-8
Kendra K Jackson, Jayzona Alberto, Jennifer Kim, Stephanie M Smith, Lidia Schapira
An innovative, case-based continuing medical education course, Health After Cancer: Cancer Survivorship for Primary Care, was developed to engage clinicians in cancer survivorship care. A post-course survey measured the educational impact of the course on learners' intentions to change practice and changes in attitudes related to interprofessional collaborative practice. Qualitative analysis of free text responses was performed using the immersion-crystallization method. Learners earning continuing education credit (N = 1202) completed the post-course evaluation survey: 17.4% physicians, 8.0% advanced practice providers, 56.7% nurses, 2.2% pharmacists, 15.7% other health professionals. Learners' intended practice changes included improving communication (N = 438), incorporating knowledge into practice (N = 282), prioritizing survivorship clinical care (N = 167), and increasing oncology-primary care collaboration for patients (N = 53). Responses frequently involved more than one theme. Specific actions or knowledge that learners intended to incorporate into practice included improving their assessment of cancer survivor's risk and concerns (N = 128), incorporating knowledge of late effects of cancer treatment into practice (N = 122), educating patients about survivorship topics (N = 117), increasing empathy and understanding of survivors' experiences (N = 94), improving listening skills (N = 70), and dedicating more time to survivorship care (N = 63). Learners' changes in attitudes reflected an increased appreciation for collaboration, especially between oncology and primary care clinicians. A continuing medical education course designed to drive interest in engaging with cancer survivorship topics was effective at shaping learners' attitudes and intent to change practice, and has the potential to improve communication, care coordination, and healthcare experiences of cancer survivors.
{"title":"Impact of a Cancer Survivorship Continuing Medical Education Course on Learners' Attitudes and Intention to Change Practice.","authors":"Kendra K Jackson, Jayzona Alberto, Jennifer Kim, Stephanie M Smith, Lidia Schapira","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02497-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02497-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An innovative, case-based continuing medical education course, Health After Cancer: Cancer Survivorship for Primary Care, was developed to engage clinicians in cancer survivorship care. A post-course survey measured the educational impact of the course on learners' intentions to change practice and changes in attitudes related to interprofessional collaborative practice. Qualitative analysis of free text responses was performed using the immersion-crystallization method. Learners earning continuing education credit (N = 1202) completed the post-course evaluation survey: 17.4% physicians, 8.0% advanced practice providers, 56.7% nurses, 2.2% pharmacists, 15.7% other health professionals. Learners' intended practice changes included improving communication (N = 438), incorporating knowledge into practice (N = 282), prioritizing survivorship clinical care (N = 167), and increasing oncology-primary care collaboration for patients (N = 53). Responses frequently involved more than one theme. Specific actions or knowledge that learners intended to incorporate into practice included improving their assessment of cancer survivor's risk and concerns (N = 128), incorporating knowledge of late effects of cancer treatment into practice (N = 122), educating patients about survivorship topics (N = 117), increasing empathy and understanding of survivors' experiences (N = 94), improving listening skills (N = 70), and dedicating more time to survivorship care (N = 63). Learners' changes in attitudes reflected an increased appreciation for collaboration, especially between oncology and primary care clinicians. A continuing medical education course designed to drive interest in engaging with cancer survivorship topics was effective at shaping learners' attitudes and intent to change practice, and has the potential to improve communication, care coordination, and healthcare experiences of cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02499-6
Amina Kili, Maria ElKababri, Carole Coze, Catherine Patte, Jaques Van Heerden, Hélène Martelli, Mhamed Harif, Laila Hessissen
Childhood cancer in Africa faces significant challenges due to workforce shortages and limited training opportunities. The French African Group for Pediatric Oncology (GFAOP) established the African School of Pediatric Oncology and introduced a pediatric oncology teaching called the "Diplome Universitaire de Cancérologie Pédiatrique" (DUCP) training program. This report evaluates the contributions of the DUCP program to pediatric oncology in Africa and discusses the sustainability of the program. The DUCP program trained six cohorts of healthcare professionals from French-speaking African countries since 2014. An evaluation was done on the participant demographics and regional contributions. Data were collected from trainee records and DUCP records. The DUCP program was evaluated based on the domains developed by the Education Program Assessment Tool (EPAT). Over the 10-year period, the DUCP program trained 107 healthcare professionals from 20 Francophone countries of which 99% were retained in Africa. Of the 83 graduates, 55 (66%) actively practice in pediatric oncology. Of the 18 francophone countries, 17 countries increased the number of pediatric oncologists and 16 improved the ratio of pediatric oncologists to children under 15 years. Nine new pediatric oncology services were established by the graduates thus far. Despite challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the program remains sustainable because of continued financial support, collaborations with the international pediatric oncology community, and adapting the program content to participant and local setting needs. Retention of graduates in childhood cancer services remains a challenge that necessitates governmental involvement. The DUCP program is impactful and sustainable and improves access for children to cancer services in Africa. By fostering continued collaboration with governments, addressing the needs of an increasing African population, and expanding support for similar initiatives, the program's longevity and positive impact can be further ensured.
{"title":"A Transformative Decade: An Evaluation of the Francophone African Group of Pediatric Oncology's Training Program (2014-2024).","authors":"Amina Kili, Maria ElKababri, Carole Coze, Catherine Patte, Jaques Van Heerden, Hélène Martelli, Mhamed Harif, Laila Hessissen","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02499-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02499-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood cancer in Africa faces significant challenges due to workforce shortages and limited training opportunities. The French African Group for Pediatric Oncology (GFAOP) established the African School of Pediatric Oncology and introduced a pediatric oncology teaching called the \"Diplome Universitaire de Cancérologie Pédiatrique\" (DUCP) training program. This report evaluates the contributions of the DUCP program to pediatric oncology in Africa and discusses the sustainability of the program. The DUCP program trained six cohorts of healthcare professionals from French-speaking African countries since 2014. An evaluation was done on the participant demographics and regional contributions. Data were collected from trainee records and DUCP records. The DUCP program was evaluated based on the domains developed by the Education Program Assessment Tool (EPAT). Over the 10-year period, the DUCP program trained 107 healthcare professionals from 20 Francophone countries of which 99% were retained in Africa. Of the 83 graduates, 55 (66%) actively practice in pediatric oncology. Of the 18 francophone countries, 17 countries increased the number of pediatric oncologists and 16 improved the ratio of pediatric oncologists to children under 15 years. Nine new pediatric oncology services were established by the graduates thus far. Despite challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the program remains sustainable because of continued financial support, collaborations with the international pediatric oncology community, and adapting the program content to participant and local setting needs. Retention of graduates in childhood cancer services remains a challenge that necessitates governmental involvement. The DUCP program is impactful and sustainable and improves access for children to cancer services in Africa. By fostering continued collaboration with governments, addressing the needs of an increasing African population, and expanding support for similar initiatives, the program's longevity and positive impact can be further ensured.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}