The stage of detection of head and neck cancer and the time between detection and treatment are critical to prognosis. The importance of the dentist in primary diagnosis and treatment planning has been emphasized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of dental students in the prevention and early diagnosis of oral cancer. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 199 students from different institutions. A self-administered questionnaire with 34 multiple-choice questions on clinical and epidemiologic knowledge and opinions about oral cancer was used. Descriptive analysis to show means and frequencies and the binomial logistic regression test were used to perform the statistical analysis. The confidence level used was 95%. The results showed that all students in the study had heard of the existence of oral cancer, but only 24.6% knew someone with the disease. The majority reported a lack of information in the population about prevention and self-examination, as well as a lack of information campaigns in institutions. Although the majority perform clinical examinations of the oral mucosa (73.4%) and refer patients with suspicious lesions to specialists, there is low confidence in performing biopsies (73.4%) and gaps in training during graduation (84.4%). The majority have never attended continuing education courses on oral cancer but show interest (97.5%). The study identifies deficiencies in the knowledge and practices of dental students and highlights the need for improved teaching and training to promote oral cancer prevention and early detection. Further research in this area and ongoing assessment of students' skills are suggested.
{"title":"Assessment of Dental Students' Knowledge and Attitudes About the Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Oral Cancer: Implications for Other Middle-income Countries.","authors":"Dhiancarlo Rocha Macedo, Eduardo Fraga Maciel, Jéssica Ferreira Rodrigues, Sérgio Vitorino Cardoso, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02529-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02529-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The stage of detection of head and neck cancer and the time between detection and treatment are critical to prognosis. The importance of the dentist in primary diagnosis and treatment planning has been emphasized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of dental students in the prevention and early diagnosis of oral cancer. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 199 students from different institutions. A self-administered questionnaire with 34 multiple-choice questions on clinical and epidemiologic knowledge and opinions about oral cancer was used. Descriptive analysis to show means and frequencies and the binomial logistic regression test were used to perform the statistical analysis. The confidence level used was 95%. The results showed that all students in the study had heard of the existence of oral cancer, but only 24.6% knew someone with the disease. The majority reported a lack of information in the population about prevention and self-examination, as well as a lack of information campaigns in institutions. Although the majority perform clinical examinations of the oral mucosa (73.4%) and refer patients with suspicious lesions to specialists, there is low confidence in performing biopsies (73.4%) and gaps in training during graduation (84.4%). The majority have never attended continuing education courses on oral cancer but show interest (97.5%). The study identifies deficiencies in the knowledge and practices of dental students and highlights the need for improved teaching and training to promote oral cancer prevention and early detection. Further research in this area and ongoing assessment of students' skills are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142577009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4
David Lazris, Heidi S Donovan, Paul Scott, Marci L Nilsen, Teresa Hagan Thomas
Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.
{"title":"Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.","authors":"David Lazris, Heidi S Donovan, Paul Scott, Marci L Nilsen, Teresa Hagan Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02535-5
Diego Álvarez-López, Gabriela Fernanda Morales-Piélago, Francisco Aguilar-Guerrero, Liliana Pérez-Peralta, Juan Manuel Hernández-Aguilar, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and deadly neoplasms worldwide, with a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries, such as Mexico. This study seeks to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to CRC in a community in Mexico City. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and April 2023 among adults aged 45 to 74 residing in six neighborhoods of the Tlalpan borough in Mexico City. The questionnaire included sections on sociodemographic characteristics, medical family history, lifestyle habits, knowledge about CRC, attitudes towards prevention, and willingness to undergo screening. Data were analyzed using logistic regression models to identify factors associated with greater knowledge, attitudes, and practices. A total of 349 people were surveyed. A total of 35.2% reported knowing what CRC is, with greater knowledge of CRC being associated with higher education levels and having a family history of cancer. A total of 23.8% showed positive attitudes towards CRC screening, influenced by having a tertiary level of education. A total of 80.8% of participants expressed willingness to undergo CRC screening if offered, with lower intention observed among men. Levels of knowledge about CRC within the studied community are low, especially among those with lower education levels and without a family history of cancer. Intervention strategies should improve CRC education and foster positive attitudes towards early detection, particularly in high-risk groups.
{"title":"Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards Colorectal Cancer in a Community in Mexico City: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Surveys.","authors":"Diego Álvarez-López, Gabriela Fernanda Morales-Piélago, Francisco Aguilar-Guerrero, Liliana Pérez-Peralta, Juan Manuel Hernández-Aguilar, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02535-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02535-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and deadly neoplasms worldwide, with a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries, such as Mexico. This study seeks to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to CRC in a community in Mexico City. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and April 2023 among adults aged 45 to 74 residing in six neighborhoods of the Tlalpan borough in Mexico City. The questionnaire included sections on sociodemographic characteristics, medical family history, lifestyle habits, knowledge about CRC, attitudes towards prevention, and willingness to undergo screening. Data were analyzed using logistic regression models to identify factors associated with greater knowledge, attitudes, and practices. A total of 349 people were surveyed. A total of 35.2% reported knowing what CRC is, with greater knowledge of CRC being associated with higher education levels and having a family history of cancer. A total of 23.8% showed positive attitudes towards CRC screening, influenced by having a tertiary level of education. A total of 80.8% of participants expressed willingness to undergo CRC screening if offered, with lower intention observed among men. Levels of knowledge about CRC within the studied community are low, especially among those with lower education levels and without a family history of cancer. Intervention strategies should improve CRC education and foster positive attitudes towards early detection, particularly in high-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142523481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-27DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02519-5
Hai-Zhen Yi, Wei Lv, Jin-Jing Chen, Zhan Lin
This study aimed to investigate the effects of Standardized Training Resident on pharmacological interventions for pain management in patients with advanced lung cancer. A total of 84 patients with advanced lung cancer and associated pain were enrolled in the study from December 2019 to August 2023 and were divided into two groups based on their attending physician: a group managed by physician-ST Training Physicians (joint group) (n = 42) and physician-only group (usual group) (n = 42). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), oral morphine equivalent, and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the Pain Management Index (PMI) was calculated. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at the 4-week follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). At week 4, compared to the usual group, the four BPI pain intensity categories were significantly lower in the joint group [worst pain: 4 (3-5) vs 8 (7-9); least pain: 1 (0-2) vs 3 (1-4); average pain: 2 (1-2) vs 5 (4-6); pain right now: 1.2 (0.7-1.9) vs 4 (3-5)] (all P > 0.05). The hospital stay duration was significantly reduced; for the seven pain interference categories, there were no significant improvements in the joint group. Significantly more patients achieved adequate pain control in the joint group than the usual group (p = .002). A reduction in OMEDD scores was observed for both cohorts, and the joint group's reduction was statistically more significant (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Standardized Training for Radiation Oncology Physicians may lead to improved pharmacological interventions and enhanced pain relief. Recognizing the importance of these trainees in the healthcare team is crucial for achieving optimal pain management outcomes.
本研究旨在探讨标准化培训住院医师对晚期肺癌患者疼痛治疗的药物干预效果。该研究从2019年12月至2023年8月共纳入84名晚期肺癌伴疼痛患者,并根据其主治医生分为两组:由医生-ST培训医生管理组(联合组)(n = 42)和仅由医生管理组(常规组)(n = 42)。简明疼痛量表(BPI)、口服吗啡当量和住院时间。此外,还计算了疼痛管理指数(PMI)。在4周的随访中,使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30(EORTC QLQ-C30)对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)进行了评估。第 4 周时,与普通组相比,关节组的四个 BPI 疼痛强度类别均显著降低[最严重疼痛:4 (3-5) vs 8 (3-5)] :最严重疼痛:4 (3-5) vs 8 (7-9);最轻微疼痛:1 (0-2) vs 3 (1-4);一般疼痛:2 (1-2) vs 5 (4-6);现在疼痛:1.2 (0.7-1.5) vs 1.5 (1-2):1.2 (0.7-1.9) vs 4 (3-5)](所有 P > 0.05)。住院时间明显缩短;在七个疼痛干扰类别中,关节组没有明显改善。关节组获得充分疼痛控制的患者明显多于普通组(P = .002)。两组患者的 OMEDD 评分均有所下降,而关节组的下降幅度在统计学上更为显著(p = 0.016)。两组在 HRQoL 方面没有明显差异。对放射肿瘤科医生进行标准化培训可改善药物干预,增强疼痛缓解效果。认识到这些受训人员在医疗团队中的重要性对于取得最佳疼痛治疗效果至关重要。
{"title":"The Impact of Standardized Training Resident on Pain Management in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.","authors":"Hai-Zhen Yi, Wei Lv, Jin-Jing Chen, Zhan Lin","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02519-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02519-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of Standardized Training Resident on pharmacological interventions for pain management in patients with advanced lung cancer. A total of 84 patients with advanced lung cancer and associated pain were enrolled in the study from December 2019 to August 2023 and were divided into two groups based on their attending physician: a group managed by physician-ST Training Physicians (joint group) (n = 42) and physician-only group (usual group) (n = 42). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), oral morphine equivalent, and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the Pain Management Index (PMI) was calculated. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at the 4-week follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). At week 4, compared to the usual group, the four BPI pain intensity categories were significantly lower in the joint group [worst pain: 4 (3-5) vs 8 (7-9); least pain: 1 (0-2) vs 3 (1-4); average pain: 2 (1-2) vs 5 (4-6); pain right now: 1.2 (0.7-1.9) vs 4 (3-5)] (all P > 0.05). The hospital stay duration was significantly reduced; for the seven pain interference categories, there were no significant improvements in the joint group. Significantly more patients achieved adequate pain control in the joint group than the usual group (p = .002). A reduction in OMEDD scores was observed for both cohorts, and the joint group's reduction was statistically more significant (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Standardized Training for Radiation Oncology Physicians may lead to improved pharmacological interventions and enhanced pain relief. Recognizing the importance of these trainees in the healthcare team is crucial for achieving optimal pain management outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02532-8
Natalie D Hernandez, Nicholas Wilson, Theodora Abah, Olga Contreras, Cheryl Franklin
This qualitative study delves into the facilitators and barriers surrounding cervical cancer prevention among Latina women in Georgia, with a specific focus on the impact of community-based organizations (CBOs). Employing semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and representatives from CBOs, faith-based organizations, and other key stakeholders, the study uncovers key themes and subthemes shaping cervical cancer disparities. Themes such as challenges in cross-cultural healthcare access, difficulties due to lack of US citizenship, and limited mobility emerge as significant barriers, while community and family support stand out as crucial facilitators to cancer prevention. Additionally, the study examines community intervention methods from CBOs to target cervical cancer disparity, highlighting the importance of public awareness campaigns, building trust within the Latina community, and providing medical support tailored to immigrant populations. Through this comprehensive examination, the study not only offers invaluable insights into the intricate web of issues surrounding cervical cancer prevention but also endeavors to serve as a catalyst for targeted interventions and evidence-based policies aimed at ameliorating cervical cancer disparities among immigrant Latinas in Georgia and beyond.
{"title":"Unveiling Cervical Cancer Inequities Among Georgia Immigrant Latinas: A Robust Qualitative Examination of the Facilitators and Barriers to Prevention, with Emphasis on the Impact of Community-Based Organizations.","authors":"Natalie D Hernandez, Nicholas Wilson, Theodora Abah, Olga Contreras, Cheryl Franklin","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02532-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02532-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative study delves into the facilitators and barriers surrounding cervical cancer prevention among Latina women in Georgia, with a specific focus on the impact of community-based organizations (CBOs). Employing semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and representatives from CBOs, faith-based organizations, and other key stakeholders, the study uncovers key themes and subthemes shaping cervical cancer disparities. Themes such as challenges in cross-cultural healthcare access, difficulties due to lack of US citizenship, and limited mobility emerge as significant barriers, while community and family support stand out as crucial facilitators to cancer prevention. Additionally, the study examines community intervention methods from CBOs to target cervical cancer disparity, highlighting the importance of public awareness campaigns, building trust within the Latina community, and providing medical support tailored to immigrant populations. Through this comprehensive examination, the study not only offers invaluable insights into the intricate web of issues surrounding cervical cancer prevention but also endeavors to serve as a catalyst for targeted interventions and evidence-based policies aimed at ameliorating cervical cancer disparities among immigrant Latinas in Georgia and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02533-7
Aaron Dou, Joy Du, Joanne Alfieri, Jennifer Croke, T P L Nghiem, Kimberly DeVries, Sharlene Gill, Paris-Ann Ingledew
Globally, surveys have identified that medical learners of all levels perceive their oncology instruction to be inadequate. To address these gaps, we systematically developed and implemented the Oncology National Course for Advocacy, Research, and Education (ONCARE), a novel, nationally organized virtual course available to all Canadian medical students and evaluated its impact on oncology competency and interest. ONCARE was designed utilizing Kern's Six-Step Model for Curriculum Development. Components of ONCARE included lectures, career panels, and a mentorship program. Pre-course and post-course survey responses were collected to determine course impact on oncology knowledge and interest. Between October 2023 and March 2024, ONCARE enrolled 235 students representing 14 Canadian medical schools. One hundred forty (60%) students enrolled reported having only 0 to 10 h of formal oncology instruction. Baseline interest in a career in oncology was high (mean Likert score 3.9/5) and remained unchanged following course completion. ONCARE increased both self-perceived knowledge in clinical oncology (mean Likert score 3.9/5 vs 2.9/5, p < 0.001) and confidence in oncology communication skills (mean Likert score 3.6/5 vs 3.1/5, p < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of students were satisfied with the course (mean Likert score 4.6/5). The implementation of ONCARE as a proof-of-concept initiative builds upon previous educational interventions in oncology and highlights important principles for the development of related initiatives. Future work will target greater interdisciplinary and multinational collaboration as well as long-term follow-up of the ONCARE cohort.
{"title":"Impact of a National Virtual Oncology Course on Medical Student Competency and Interest in Oncology.","authors":"Aaron Dou, Joy Du, Joanne Alfieri, Jennifer Croke, T P L Nghiem, Kimberly DeVries, Sharlene Gill, Paris-Ann Ingledew","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02533-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02533-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, surveys have identified that medical learners of all levels perceive their oncology instruction to be inadequate. To address these gaps, we systematically developed and implemented the Oncology National Course for Advocacy, Research, and Education (ONCARE), a novel, nationally organized virtual course available to all Canadian medical students and evaluated its impact on oncology competency and interest. ONCARE was designed utilizing Kern's Six-Step Model for Curriculum Development. Components of ONCARE included lectures, career panels, and a mentorship program. Pre-course and post-course survey responses were collected to determine course impact on oncology knowledge and interest. Between October 2023 and March 2024, ONCARE enrolled 235 students representing 14 Canadian medical schools. One hundred forty (60%) students enrolled reported having only 0 to 10 h of formal oncology instruction. Baseline interest in a career in oncology was high (mean Likert score 3.9/5) and remained unchanged following course completion. ONCARE increased both self-perceived knowledge in clinical oncology (mean Likert score 3.9/5 vs 2.9/5, p < 0.001) and confidence in oncology communication skills (mean Likert score 3.6/5 vs 3.1/5, p < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of students were satisfied with the course (mean Likert score 4.6/5). The implementation of ONCARE as a proof-of-concept initiative builds upon previous educational interventions in oncology and highlights important principles for the development of related initiatives. Future work will target greater interdisciplinary and multinational collaboration as well as long-term follow-up of the ONCARE cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02525-7
Varon Ml, Reynoso N, Torres Ja, Pérez M, Cantú D, Bargallo Je, Jimenez Ma, Arroyo M, Meneses A, Aguilar S, Ortiz S, Arrieta O, Herrera LA, Hawk E, Chang S
Cancer in Mexico is a major public burden for which rates are expected to increase over time. In settings like Mexico, much potential for reduction through cancer prevention efforts remains unrealized, due in part, to a lack of formal cancer prevention and control training and career opportunities. We trained a cadre of instructors to deliver a pilot cancer prevention education program for oncology professionals and leaders. Instructors were oriented to the curriculum and its purpose, given instruction in interactive adult learning techniques using video conferencing tools, and supported by small-group and one-on-one meetings. Throughout this initiative, we learned the importance of mentoring of young professionals interested in cancer prevention and in having careers in the field. Instructors reported highly favorable ratings for participating in training and having high expectations of being recognized as instructors, highlighting the importance of this approach. Strengthening cancer prevention in Mexico rests on the sustainability of cancer prevention professional education programs and their disseminating impact through support of trained instructors to deliver cancer prevention curricula in the future.
{"title":"An Opportunity for Developing Cancer Prevention Leadership in Mexico.","authors":"Varon Ml, Reynoso N, Torres Ja, Pérez M, Cantú D, Bargallo Je, Jimenez Ma, Arroyo M, Meneses A, Aguilar S, Ortiz S, Arrieta O, Herrera LA, Hawk E, Chang S","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02525-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-024-02525-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer in Mexico is a major public burden for which rates are expected to increase over time. In settings like Mexico, much potential for reduction through cancer prevention efforts remains unrealized, due in part, to a lack of formal cancer prevention and control training and career opportunities. We trained a cadre of instructors to deliver a pilot cancer prevention education program for oncology professionals and leaders. Instructors were oriented to the curriculum and its purpose, given instruction in interactive adult learning techniques using video conferencing tools, and supported by small-group and one-on-one meetings. Throughout this initiative, we learned the importance of mentoring of young professionals interested in cancer prevention and in having careers in the field. Instructors reported highly favorable ratings for participating in training and having high expectations of being recognized as instructors, highlighting the importance of this approach. Strengthening cancer prevention in Mexico rests on the sustainability of cancer prevention professional education programs and their disseminating impact through support of trained instructors to deliver cancer prevention curricula in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02531-9
Laura Samson, Brandon S Chai, Paris-Ann Ingledew
Thyroid cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis among those aged 15-29, with a noticeable increase in cases over the last decade. YouTube, one of the most frequented websites on the internet, serves as a common platform to obtain health information. This study uses a systematic approach to characterize YouTube videos related to radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for thyroid cancer. The first 50 videos across four distinct YouTube search terms related to RAI therapy for thyroid cancer were identified after applying exclusion criteria. A previously validated video assessment tool was utilized to evaluate the videos. Two independent reviewers assessed a random sample of 10 videos, while the remaining 40 videos were evaluated by one reviewer as there were minimal discrepancies in coding. Among the identified videos, 26 videos were published within the past 3 years, with a median video length of 4 min and 53s. The three most common publishers' affiliations were non-profits (15 videos), personal accounts (12 videos), and health care facilities/organizations (11 videos). Most of the videos originated in the United States, used an interview format, featured physician presenters, and were directed towards patients. Highly covered topics included "side effects and risks" and "RAI therapy overview". The findings underscore the significant role YouTube plays in aiding patient comprehension of RAI therapy for thyroid cancer based on video parameters and content. These results can inform physicians' discussions with patients regarding YouTube and contribute to the development of new, high-quality YouTube videos to support thyroid cancer education.
{"title":"Assessment of YouTube Videos Related to Radioactive Iodine Therapy for Thyroid Cancer for Patient Education.","authors":"Laura Samson, Brandon S Chai, Paris-Ann Ingledew","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02531-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02531-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thyroid cancer is the most common cancer diagnosis among those aged 15-29, with a noticeable increase in cases over the last decade. YouTube, one of the most frequented websites on the internet, serves as a common platform to obtain health information. This study uses a systematic approach to characterize YouTube videos related to radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for thyroid cancer. The first 50 videos across four distinct YouTube search terms related to RAI therapy for thyroid cancer were identified after applying exclusion criteria. A previously validated video assessment tool was utilized to evaluate the videos. Two independent reviewers assessed a random sample of 10 videos, while the remaining 40 videos were evaluated by one reviewer as there were minimal discrepancies in coding. Among the identified videos, 26 videos were published within the past 3 years, with a median video length of 4 min and 53s. The three most common publishers' affiliations were non-profits (15 videos), personal accounts (12 videos), and health care facilities/organizations (11 videos). Most of the videos originated in the United States, used an interview format, featured physician presenters, and were directed towards patients. Highly covered topics included \"side effects and risks\" and \"RAI therapy overview\". The findings underscore the significant role YouTube plays in aiding patient comprehension of RAI therapy for thyroid cancer based on video parameters and content. These results can inform physicians' discussions with patients regarding YouTube and contribute to the development of new, high-quality YouTube videos to support thyroid cancer education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02530-w
Mohammed A AlFada, Hend Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Madani, Ibrahim F Alshayea, Abdulaziz A Alodhayani
Early recognition of skin cancer reduces associated morbidity and improves survival. Most patients with suspicious skin lesions present to family medicine physicians. We aimed to evaluate the self-reported competency of family medicine residents in performing skin cancer examination (SCE) and assess the impact of different factors on their competency. All family medicine residents completed a previously validated questionnaire aimed at evaluating their skin cancer examination competency in this cross-sectional study. In total, 250 residents participated in this study. More than half of the residents never had a rotation in dermatology or received training under the supervision of a dermatologist. Approximately 70%, 72%, and 77% of residents had not observed SCE, received SCE training, and performed SCE, respectively. Although most residents were aware of the risk factors for skin cancer and the ABCD acronym for melanoma, only one out of ten residents screened their patients for these factors, enquired about changes in skin lesions, and personally practiced SCE. Only 16% of family medicine residents consider themselves competent in performing SCE. Training under the guidance of a dermatologist, SCE training, evaluating patients for cancer risk factors and any changes in moles, and SCE practice on personal level were associated with SCE competency. Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between the frequency of observing SCE and competency in performing SCE. Only 16% of family medicine residents considered themselves competent in performing SCE. The frequency of observation of SCE during residency was a significant predictor of self-reported competency in performing SCE.
{"title":"Competency of Family Medicine Residents in Performing Skin Cancer Examination.","authors":"Mohammed A AlFada, Hend Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Madani, Ibrahim F Alshayea, Abdulaziz A Alodhayani","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02530-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02530-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early recognition of skin cancer reduces associated morbidity and improves survival. Most patients with suspicious skin lesions present to family medicine physicians. We aimed to evaluate the self-reported competency of family medicine residents in performing skin cancer examination (SCE) and assess the impact of different factors on their competency. All family medicine residents completed a previously validated questionnaire aimed at evaluating their skin cancer examination competency in this cross-sectional study. In total, 250 residents participated in this study. More than half of the residents never had a rotation in dermatology or received training under the supervision of a dermatologist. Approximately 70%, 72%, and 77% of residents had not observed SCE, received SCE training, and performed SCE, respectively. Although most residents were aware of the risk factors for skin cancer and the ABCD acronym for melanoma, only one out of ten residents screened their patients for these factors, enquired about changes in skin lesions, and personally practiced SCE. Only 16% of family medicine residents consider themselves competent in performing SCE. Training under the guidance of a dermatologist, SCE training, evaluating patients for cancer risk factors and any changes in moles, and SCE practice on personal level were associated with SCE competency. Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between the frequency of observing SCE and competency in performing SCE. Only 16% of family medicine residents considered themselves competent in performing SCE. The frequency of observation of SCE during residency was a significant predictor of self-reported competency in performing SCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02517-7
Manish R Patel, Abbie Begnaud, Shanda H Blackmon, Arkadiusz Z Dudek, Naomi Fujioka, Janine C K Harewood, Pasi A Jänne, Shirley Kern, Lacey Running Hawk, Ann M Rusk, Fatima G Wilder, Robert Winn, Nancy Torrison, Stephanie Searle
Lung cancer patient education resources that address barriers to health literacy, improve understanding, and demonstrate improved patient outcomes are limited. Our study aim was to evaluate and report on learner knowledge improvement and intent to implement behavior change, and validate the benefits of the You and Lung Cancer website and YouTube resources. Our study occurred from November 2017 to December 2023. We evaluated audience reach (visit sessions, unique visitors, country origins, page views) and calculated top views by media type (animations, expert videos, patient videos). We assessed the impact and commitment to change through learner surveys (areas of interest, intention to modify behaviors, and intention to discuss disease management with providers) and tested the knowledge of learners pre- and post-reviewing of website content. Our program reached 794,203 views globally; 467,546 were unique visitors; and 243,124 (51%) were unique visitors from the USA. Of US visitors, 46% identified as lung cancer patients. These were patients in treatment (38%), survivors (8%), family members or caregivers (21%), and healthcare providers (14%) with other audiences unspecified (19%). Three areas of highest learner importance were the animations "Understanding Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer" (180,591), "Staging of Lung Cancer" (144,238), and "Treatment and Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer" (49,244). Our study confirmed areas of importance to lung cancer patients and suggests that visual formats of learning, such as animations, can mitigate health literacy barriers and help improve patient understanding and outcomes. Exporting this format of learning to other cancers has the potential to benefit patients and improve health outcomes.
{"title":"Improving Patient Understanding and Outcomes in Lung Cancer Using an Animated Patient's Guide with Visual Formats of Learning.","authors":"Manish R Patel, Abbie Begnaud, Shanda H Blackmon, Arkadiusz Z Dudek, Naomi Fujioka, Janine C K Harewood, Pasi A Jänne, Shirley Kern, Lacey Running Hawk, Ann M Rusk, Fatima G Wilder, Robert Winn, Nancy Torrison, Stephanie Searle","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02517-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02517-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer patient education resources that address barriers to health literacy, improve understanding, and demonstrate improved patient outcomes are limited. Our study aim was to evaluate and report on learner knowledge improvement and intent to implement behavior change, and validate the benefits of the You and Lung Cancer website and YouTube resources. Our study occurred from November 2017 to December 2023. We evaluated audience reach (visit sessions, unique visitors, country origins, page views) and calculated top views by media type (animations, expert videos, patient videos). We assessed the impact and commitment to change through learner surveys (areas of interest, intention to modify behaviors, and intention to discuss disease management with providers) and tested the knowledge of learners pre- and post-reviewing of website content. Our program reached 794,203 views globally; 467,546 were unique visitors; and 243,124 (51%) were unique visitors from the USA. Of US visitors, 46% identified as lung cancer patients. These were patients in treatment (38%), survivors (8%), family members or caregivers (21%), and healthcare providers (14%) with other audiences unspecified (19%). Three areas of highest learner importance were the animations \"Understanding Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer\" (180,591), \"Staging of Lung Cancer\" (144,238), and \"Treatment and Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer\" (49,244). Our study confirmed areas of importance to lung cancer patients and suggests that visual formats of learning, such as animations, can mitigate health literacy barriers and help improve patient understanding and outcomes. Exporting this format of learning to other cancers has the potential to benefit patients and improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142512205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}