Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105258
Rachel M. Walker , Wendy Chaboyer , Lukman Thalib , Sharon Latimer , Haitham Tuffaha , Marie Cooke , Brigid M. Gillespie
Background
Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a serious patient safety issue with the sacrum the most common location. Silicone foam border dressings are increasingly used in hospitalised patients, yet their clinical and cost-effectiveness in preventing pressure injuries is unclear in some patient cohorts.
Objective
To determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a silicone foam border dressing in preventing sacral hospital acquired pressure injuries in at-risk medical-surgical patients.
Methods
A prospective, multi-site, parallel group, pragmatic, superiority randomised controlled trial was conducted in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Medical-surgical adult patients (≥ 18 years) at-risk of pressure injury were recruited and randomly allocated to either an intervention (sacral dressing plus routine care) or control (routine care only) group. The Primary outcome was development of a new sacral pressure injury. Daily, blinded, and independent outcome assessments were conducted off-site for up to 14 days using edited photographs of deidentified participants' sacra. Intention-To-Treat analyses were performed using both best-case and worse-case scenarios. Additional complete case analyses were conducted as part of sensitivity analyses. Secondary outcomes comprised time to onset of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injury, severity, incidence rates per 1000 trial days (days patients were in the trial), incidence rates per 1000 hospital days (days patients were in hospital), and cost-effectiveness that compared the difference in pressure injury incidence between groups.
Results
Of the 1121 eligible patients approached, 958 agreed to participate. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between intervention and control groups. Cumulative incidence of sacral pressure injury was 1.67 % (8/478) and 1.25 % (6/480) in the intervention and control groups respectively (p = 0.592).
There was an increased risk of pressure injury for those in the intervention group (Relative Risk: 1.34 (95 % CI 0.47–3.83)), but the effect was not statistically significant and confidence intervals wide. Distribution of secondary outcomes was also similar in both the intervention and control groups. The intervention was more costly than the control showing an incremental cost of $99.90 (95 % CI $74.10–$125.60) associated with using the dressings.
Conclusions
The study did not provide evidence that silicone foam border dressings reduced the incidence of sacral hospital acquired pressure injuries in adult medical-surgical patients at risk of pressure injuries. Additionally, the silicone foam dressings incurred higher incremental costs than routine care.
Trial registration number
ACTRESN12619000763145, Registered 22/05/2019, first recruitment 10/07/2020.
医院获得性压力损伤是一个严重的患者安全问题,骶骨是最常见的部位。硅酮泡沫边界敷料越来越多地用于住院患者,但在一些患者队列中,其预防压力损伤的临床和成本效益尚不清楚。目的探讨硅胶泡沫边沿敷料预防外科高危患者骶骨医院获得性压力损伤的临床效果和成本效益。方法在澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部进行前瞻性、多地点、平行组、实用、优势的随机对照试验。招募有压力损伤风险的成年内科手术患者(≥18岁),并随机分配到干预组(骶骨敷料加常规护理)或对照组(仅常规护理)。主要结果是发生了新的骶骨压迫性损伤。每天,盲法和独立的结果评估进行了长达14天的非现场使用编辑的照片去识别参与者的骶骨。意向治疗分析使用最佳情况和最坏情况进行。作为敏感性分析的一部分,进行了额外的完整病例分析。次要结局包括医院获得性骶骨压迫性损伤的发病时间、严重程度、每1000个试验日的发病率(患者参加试验的天数)、每1000个住院日的发病率(患者住院的天数)以及比较组间压力性损伤发生率差异的成本效益。在1121名符合条件的患者中,958名同意参与。干预组和对照组的基线特征无显著差异。干预组和对照组骶压迫损伤的累计发生率分别为1.67%(8/478)和1.25%(6/480),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.592)。干预组患者发生压伤的风险增加(相对危险度:1.34 (95% CI 0.47-3.83)),但影响无统计学意义,置信区间较宽。干预组和对照组的次要结局分布也相似。干预费用高于对照组,与使用敷料相关的增量费用为99.90美元(95% CI 74.10 - 125.60美元)。结论本研究未提供证据证明硅胶泡沫边界敷料可降低有压力损伤风险的成人内科手术患者骶骨医院获得性压力损伤的发生率。此外,硅胶泡沫敷料比常规护理产生更高的增量成本。试验报名编号actresn12619000763145,报名时间为2019年5月22日,首次招募时间为2020年7月10日。
{"title":"EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients (EEPOC): A randomised control trial","authors":"Rachel M. Walker , Wendy Chaboyer , Lukman Thalib , Sharon Latimer , Haitham Tuffaha , Marie Cooke , Brigid M. Gillespie","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105258","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105258","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a serious patient safety issue with the sacrum the most common location. Silicone foam border dressings are increasingly used in hospitalised patients, yet their clinical and cost-effectiveness in preventing pressure injuries is unclear in some patient cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a silicone foam border dressing in preventing sacral hospital acquired pressure injuries in at-risk medical-surgical patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, multi-site, parallel group, pragmatic, superiority randomised controlled trial was conducted in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Medical-surgical adult patients (≥<!--> <!-->18 years) at-risk of pressure injury were recruited and randomly allocated to either an intervention (sacral dressing plus routine care) or control (routine care only) group. The Primary outcome was development of a new sacral pressure injury. Daily, blinded, and independent outcome assessments were conducted off-site for up to 14 days using edited photographs of deidentified participants' sacra. Intention-To-Treat analyses were performed using both best-case and worse-case scenarios. Additional complete case analyses were conducted as part of sensitivity analyses. Secondary outcomes comprised time to onset of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injury, severity, incidence rates per 1000 trial days (days patients were in the trial), incidence rates per 1000 hospital days (days patients were in hospital), and cost-effectiveness that compared the difference in pressure injury incidence between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1121 eligible patients approached, 958 agreed to participate. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between intervention and control groups. Cumulative incidence of sacral pressure injury was 1.67 % (8/478) and 1.25 % (6/480) in the intervention and control groups respectively (p = 0.592).</div><div>There was an increased risk of pressure injury for those in the intervention group (Relative Risk: 1.34 (95 % CI 0.47–3.83)), but the effect was not statistically significant and confidence intervals wide. Distribution of secondary outcomes was also similar in both the intervention and control groups. The intervention was more costly than the control showing an incremental cost of $99.90 (95 % CI $74.10–$125.60) associated with using the dressings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study did not provide evidence that silicone foam border dressings reduced the incidence of sacral hospital acquired pressure injuries in adult medical-surgical patients at risk of pressure injuries. Additionally, the silicone foam dressings incurred higher incremental costs than routine care.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration number</h3><div>ACTRESN12619000763145, Registered 22/05/2019, first recruitment 10/07/2020.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105258"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145382811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105257
Azar Jafari-Koulaee , Eesa Mohammadi , Mary T. Fox , Aliakbar Rasekhi , Ozra Akha
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The care transition intervention has been designed to guide users in supporting older adults during care transitions; however, there is little knowledge about its effectiveness in older adults with multiple chronic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the effects of the care transition intervention in older adults with multiple chronic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A randomized intervention study with a mixed-methods design was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The quantitative phase of the study was conducted using a randomized clinical trial on older patients with multiple chronic conditions referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari (Mazandaran, Iran) in 2022–2024. Patients in the experimental group received the care transition intervention which involved implementing a patient-centered record, and providing education on medication self-management, warning signs of worsening health condition(s) and how react to them, and follow-up. Patients in the control group received routine hospital care. Quality of life and the number of hospital readmissions were assessed before the intervention, and at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge. The qualitative phase focused on understanding the experiences of patients and caregivers who had participated in the care transition intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Finally, after analyzing the data from the quantitative and qualitative phases, the quantitative findings were compared to the qualitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a statistically significant between group difference in Quality of life at one (control group: 69.28(8.64), experimental group: 64.36(10.82)), three (control group: 71.41(8.70), experimental group: 64.20(10.90)) and six months (control group: 72.21(8.93), experimental group: 64.29 (11.26)) after hospital discharge (P < 0.05). Also, hospital readmission in the control group was 73 % higher than the experimental group. The greatest effect of the intervention for quality of life (effect size = 0.77) and readmission (effect size = 0.63) was found six months after discharge. Qualitative findings support a beneficial effect of the care transition intervention on the quality of life and readmission in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using the care transition intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions improves health-related outcomes and is associated with reduced disease burden and more satisfaction towards life in different physical, psychological, and social dimensions for them. Therefore, implementing the care transition intervention can be useful for patients, their families and the healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>This trial was registered at <span><span>irct.behdasht.gov.ir</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (Identifier: IRCT2
{"title":"Effects of the care transition intervention on hospital readmission and quality of life in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A mixed methods study","authors":"Azar Jafari-Koulaee , Eesa Mohammadi , Mary T. Fox , Aliakbar Rasekhi , Ozra Akha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105257","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105257","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The care transition intervention has been designed to guide users in supporting older adults during care transitions; however, there is little knowledge about its effectiveness in older adults with multiple chronic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the effects of the care transition intervention in older adults with multiple chronic conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A randomized intervention study with a mixed-methods design was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The quantitative phase of the study was conducted using a randomized clinical trial on older patients with multiple chronic conditions referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari (Mazandaran, Iran) in 2022–2024. Patients in the experimental group received the care transition intervention which involved implementing a patient-centered record, and providing education on medication self-management, warning signs of worsening health condition(s) and how react to them, and follow-up. Patients in the control group received routine hospital care. Quality of life and the number of hospital readmissions were assessed before the intervention, and at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge. The qualitative phase focused on understanding the experiences of patients and caregivers who had participated in the care transition intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Finally, after analyzing the data from the quantitative and qualitative phases, the quantitative findings were compared to the qualitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a statistically significant between group difference in Quality of life at one (control group: 69.28(8.64), experimental group: 64.36(10.82)), three (control group: 71.41(8.70), experimental group: 64.20(10.90)) and six months (control group: 72.21(8.93), experimental group: 64.29 (11.26)) after hospital discharge (P < 0.05). Also, hospital readmission in the control group was 73 % higher than the experimental group. The greatest effect of the intervention for quality of life (effect size = 0.77) and readmission (effect size = 0.63) was found six months after discharge. Qualitative findings support a beneficial effect of the care transition intervention on the quality of life and readmission in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using the care transition intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions improves health-related outcomes and is associated with reduced disease burden and more satisfaction towards life in different physical, psychological, and social dimensions for them. Therefore, implementing the care transition intervention can be useful for patients, their families and the healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>This trial was registered at <span><span>irct.behdasht.gov.ir</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (Identifier: IRCT2","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 105257"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145475637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Workplace violence negatively affects nurses' psychological well-being and job performance and the quality of patient care. Traditional workplace violence prevention training programs are not typically theory-driven and do not typically allow participants to apply practical skills. To address this gap, this study conducted a self-defense training intervention involving Brazilian jiu-jitsu training and elements of experiential learning theory. The primary outcome was self-efficacy in managing workplace violence. The secondary outcomes of interest were perceptions of and attitudes toward workplace violence management.
Methods
This multicenter, quasiexperimental study recruited 280 nurses from several health-care institutions. Participants were divided into an intervention group (n = 133), which completed a Brazilian jiu-jitsu-based self-defense training intervention, and a control group (n = 147), which received traditional classroom-based workplace violence prevention training. Outcomes were assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Perception of Aggression Scale, and Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after the intervention. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the effects of the intervention.
Results
At immediate post-intervention, the intervention group exhibited significantly greater improvements in self-efficacy (β = 3.02; 95 % CI 1.47–4.57) and workplace violence perceptions (β = 6.94; 95 % CI 4.90–8.98) than did the control group. The intervention did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in attitudes toward workplace violence management (β = 0.83; 95 % CI − 0.23–1.89). Covariate analysis revealed that sex (higher in men), work location (higher at medical centers), and work unit (lower in psychiatry units) significantly influenced outcomes.
Conclusions
Theory-driven Brazilian jiu-jitsu-based self-defense training significantly enhance nurses' perceptions and self-efficacy in handling workplace violence, highlighting the value of experiential learning in nursing workplace violence prevention programs.
Registration number
NCT 06129929.
背景:工作场所暴力对护士的心理健康、工作绩效和患者护理质量产生负面影响。传统的工作场所暴力预防培训项目通常不是理论驱动的,通常不允许参与者应用实际技能。为了解决这一差距,本研究进行了一项涉及巴西柔术训练和体验学习理论要素的自卫训练干预。主要结果是管理工作场所暴力的自我效能。次要结果是对工作场所暴力管理的看法和态度。方法:本研究采用多中心准实验方法,从多家医疗机构招募280名护士。参与者被分为干预组(n = 133)和对照组(n = 147),干预组完成了基于巴西柔术的自卫训练干预,对照组接受了传统的基于课堂的工作场所暴力预防培训。结果采用一般自我效能量表、攻击知觉量表和攻击与暴力管理态度量表进行评估。在基线和干预后进行评估。使用广义估计方程来检验干预的效果。结果:干预后,干预组在自我效能(β = 3.02; 95% CI 1.47-4.57)和工作场所暴力感知(β = 6.94; 95% CI 4.90-8.98)方面的改善显著高于对照组。干预没有导致对工作场所暴力管理态度的统计学显著改善(β = 0.83; 95% CI -0.23-1.89)。协变量分析显示,性别(男性较高)、工作地点(医疗中心较高)和工作单位(精神科较低)对结果有显著影响。结论:理论驱动的巴西柔术自卫训练显著提高了护士处理工作场所暴力的感知和自我效能感,凸显了体验式学习在护理工作场所暴力预防项目中的价值。注册号:NCT06129929。
{"title":"Effectiveness of a theory-driven Brazilian jiu-jitsu-based medical self-defense training for nurses facing workplace violence: A multicenter quasi-experimental study","authors":"Ching-Yuan Ma , Sheng-Ji Liao , Yue-Cune Chang , Hui-Hsun Chiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105260","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105260","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Workplace violence negatively affects nurses' psychological well-being and job performance and the quality of patient care. Traditional workplace violence prevention training programs are not typically theory-driven and do not typically allow participants to apply practical skills. To address this gap, this study conducted a self-defense training intervention involving Brazilian jiu-jitsu training and elements of experiential learning theory. The primary outcome was self-efficacy in managing workplace violence. The secondary outcomes of interest were perceptions of and attitudes toward workplace violence management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter, quasiexperimental study recruited 280 nurses from several health-care institutions. Participants were divided into an intervention group (<em>n</em> = 133), which completed a Brazilian jiu-jitsu-based self-defense training intervention, and a control group (<em>n</em> = 147), which received traditional classroom-based workplace violence prevention training. Outcomes were assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Perception of Aggression Scale, and Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after the intervention. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the effects of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At immediate post-intervention, the intervention group exhibited significantly greater improvements in self-efficacy (β = 3.02; 95 % CI 1.47–4.57) and workplace violence perceptions (β = 6.94; 95 % CI 4.90–8.98) than did the control group. The intervention did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in attitudes toward workplace violence management (β = 0.83; 95 % CI −<!--> <!-->0.23–1.89). Covariate analysis revealed that sex (higher in men), work location (higher at medical centers), and work unit (lower in psychiatry units) significantly influenced outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Theory-driven Brazilian jiu-jitsu-based self-defense training significantly enhance nurses' perceptions and self-efficacy in handling workplace violence, highlighting the value of experiential learning in nursing workplace violence prevention programs.</div></div><div><h3>Registration number</h3><div>NCT 06129929.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105260"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105259
DanTing Chen , ZiPing Zhu , YanHong Shi , Hong Li , Rong Lin
Background
Depression is more common in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease, and the presence of depressive symptoms accelerates disease progression and affects patients' physical and mental health. Although the prevalence of and the risk factors associated with depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease have been widely reported, these results have not been synthesized.
Objectives
The aim of this review was to systematically assess the prevalence and risk factors affecting the occurrence of depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease.
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, Weipu Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched in the systematic review. The search included all literature published up to June 1st, 2025.
Review methods
Original journal articles that met the inclusion criteria were included. Two investigators independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0, and the pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms was estimated using a random-effects model.
Results
In total, 46 eligible studies were included in this review, and there was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies. The meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease was 28 % (95 % CI: 0.24–0.32).
背景:抑郁症在老年阿尔茨海默病患者中更为常见,抑郁症状的出现加速了疾病的进展,影响了患者的身心健康。虽然临床前老年阿尔茨海默病的患病率和与抑郁症状相关的危险因素已被广泛报道,但这些结果尚未综合。目的:本综述的目的是系统地评估老年阿尔茨海默病患者抑郁症状发生的患病率和危险因素。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、中国知识资源综合数据库、万方数据库、卫普数据库、中国生物医学数据库。检索包括截至2025年6月1日发表的所有文献。综述方法:纳入符合纳入标准的期刊原创文章。两名研究者独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用Stata 18.0进行荟萃分析,并使用随机效应模型估计抑郁症状的总患病率。结果:本综述共纳入46项符合条件的研究,研究之间存在高度异质性。荟萃分析显示,老年阿尔茨海默病患者抑郁症状的患病率为28% (95% CI: 0.24-0.32)。
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors for depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"DanTing Chen , ZiPing Zhu , YanHong Shi , Hong Li , Rong Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105259","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105259","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Depression is more common in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease, and the presence of depressive symptoms accelerates disease progression and affects patients' physical and mental health. Although the prevalence of and the risk factors associated with depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease have been widely reported, these results have not been synthesized.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this review was to systematically assess the prevalence and risk factors affecting the occurrence of depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, Weipu Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched in the systematic review. The search included all literature published up to June 1st, 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>Original journal articles that met the inclusion criteria were included. Two investigators independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0, and the pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms was estimated using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 46 eligible studies were included in this review, and there was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies. The meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of depressive symptoms in older adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease was 28 % (95 % CI: 0.24–0.32).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105259"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105262
Yin Li , John Howell , Jeannie P. Cimiotti
Background
Discrete Choice Experiments are a widely used stated preference method that simulates real-world decision-making by presenting individuals with hypothetical choice sets that vary across attributes. In healthcare, and increasingly in nursing workforce research, discrete choice experiments offer valuable insights into job preferences and inform strategies for recruitment, retention, and policy development. This review examines the application of discrete choice experiments in nursing workforce research, evaluates methodological practices across studies, and identifies areas for improvement to guide future applications.
Methods
We conducted a literature search across Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using keywords related to nursing and discrete choice experiments. Empirical studies published in English through December 2024 were included if they used discrete choice experiments to examine nurses' or midwives' job preferences. Non-empirical articles and studies that included other professionals were excluded. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed.
Results
Most studies were conducted in low- and middle-income countries, with half focusing on rural–urban job preferences. Choice task designs varied widely; while most used binary choice formats, only a few included labeled designs or opt-out options. Attribute and level selection methods often relied on literature review or focus groups, but few studies used a comprehensive approach. Experimental designs were inconsistent, with half employing D-efficient designs and limited use of versioning to reduce respondent burden. Pilot testing was conducted in most studies, but it was typically small-scale and lacked representation of subgroups. Econometric analysis varied, including conditional logit, mixed logit, and multinomial logit models. About half of the reviewed studies estimated willingness to pay and conducted counterfactual simulations. Several studies lacked transparency in analytic reporting.
Conclusions
This review highlights both the promise and limitations of current discrete choice experiment practices in nursing workforce research. While discrete choice experiments are increasingly used to quantify nurses' job preferences, methodological rigor remains inconsistent, particularly in attribute development, experimental design, piloting, and analytic transparency. Future studies should adopt more systematic approaches, leverage advanced modeling techniques, and use simulations to enhance policy relevance. Standardizing best practices will improve the comparability and utility of discrete choice experiments for informing nursing workforce planning and health system policy.
离散选择实验是一种广泛使用的陈述偏好方法,它通过向个体提供不同属性的假设选择集来模拟现实世界的决策。在医疗保健和越来越多的护理人员研究中,离散选择实验为工作偏好提供了有价值的见解,并为招聘、保留和政策制定提供了信息。本文回顾了离散选择实验在护理人员研究中的应用,评估了研究中的方法实践,并确定了需要改进的领域,以指导未来的应用。方法通过Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar等网站检索护理相关关键词和离散选择实验相关文献。截至2024年12月,以英语发表的实证研究如果使用离散选择实验来检查护士或助产士的工作偏好,则包括在内。非实证文章和包括其他专业人员的研究被排除在外。12项研究符合纳入标准并进行了分析。大多数研究是在低收入和中等收入国家进行的,其中一半集中在农村和城市的工作偏好上。选择任务的设计差异很大;虽然大多数使用二元选择格式,但只有少数包含标记设计或选择退出选项。属性和水平选择方法通常依赖于文献回顾或焦点小组,但很少有研究使用综合方法。实验设计不一致,一半采用D-efficient设计,有限地使用版本控制来减少被调查者的负担。在大多数研究中进行了试点测试,但它通常是小规模的,缺乏亚组的代表性。计量经济分析多种多样,包括条件logit、混合logit和多项logit模型。在被审查的研究中,约有一半估计了付费意愿,并进行了反事实模拟。一些研究在分析报告中缺乏透明度。结论本综述强调了目前离散选择实验实践在护理人力研究中的前景和局限性。虽然离散选择实验越来越多地用于量化护士的工作偏好,但方法的严谨性仍然不一致,特别是在属性开发,实验设计,试点和分析透明度方面。未来的研究应采用更系统的方法,利用先进的建模技术,并利用模拟来增强政策相关性。标准化最佳实践将提高离散选择实验的可比性和实用性,为护理人力规划和卫生系统政策提供信息。
{"title":"Discrete choice experiments in nursing workforce research: A methodological review","authors":"Yin Li , John Howell , Jeannie P. Cimiotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105262","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105262","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Discrete Choice Experiments are a widely used stated preference method that simulates real-world decision-making by presenting individuals with hypothetical choice sets that vary across attributes. In healthcare, and increasingly in nursing workforce research, discrete choice experiments offer valuable insights into job preferences and inform strategies for recruitment, retention, and policy development. This review examines the application of discrete choice experiments in nursing workforce research, evaluates methodological practices across studies, and identifies areas for improvement to guide future applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a literature search across Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using keywords related to nursing and discrete choice experiments. Empirical studies published in English through December 2024 were included if they used discrete choice experiments to examine nurses' or midwives' job preferences. Non-empirical articles and studies that included other professionals were excluded. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies were conducted in low- and middle-income countries, with half focusing on rural–urban job preferences. Choice task designs varied widely; while most used binary choice formats, only a few included labeled designs or opt-out options. Attribute and level selection methods often relied on literature review or focus groups, but few studies used a comprehensive approach. Experimental designs were inconsistent, with half employing D-efficient designs and limited use of versioning to reduce respondent burden. Pilot testing was conducted in most studies, but it was typically small-scale and lacked representation of subgroups. Econometric analysis varied, including conditional logit, mixed logit, and multinomial logit models. About half of the reviewed studies estimated willingness to pay and conducted counterfactual simulations. Several studies lacked transparency in analytic reporting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review highlights both the promise and limitations of current discrete choice experiment practices in nursing workforce research. While discrete choice experiments are increasingly used to quantify nurses' job preferences, methodological rigor remains inconsistent, particularly in attribute development, experimental design, piloting, and analytic transparency. Future studies should adopt more systematic approaches, leverage advanced modeling techniques, and use simulations to enhance policy relevance. Standardizing best practices will improve the comparability and utility of discrete choice experiments for informing nursing workforce planning and health system policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105262"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145364409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-21DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105255
Michael Herz , Simon Blaschke , Doris Gebhard
Background
Demands and resources significantly influence burnout and work ability, which are critical outcomes in nursing workforce health research. Burnout is a multidimensional construct comprising emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment due to prolonged work-related stress, while work ability describes a worker's capacity to meet job demands given their health, skills, and mental resources. Evidence suggests that the extent of burnout and work ability varies across different care settings. However, research on the relationships between demands, resources, burnout dimensions, and work ability in the context of long-term care remains limited.
Objective
To test a modified version of the Job Demands-Resources model by assessing measurement invariance and examining the relationships between demands, resources, burnout dimensions, and work ability, as well as comparing these relationships across residential long-term care and home care settings.
Design
A Multi-group Structural Equation Modelling approach.
Participants
301 employees working in German residential long-term care and home care facilities.
Methods
Data from two cross-sectional studies conducted in residential care (November–December 2019) and home care (September–October 2020) were analyzed using a multi-group structural equation model. Measurement invariance testing was applied to validate the model across both settings and to identify setting-specific differences.
Results
The modified Job Demands-Resources model demonstrated measurement invariance across residential and home care settings, confirming its applicability in both long-term care settings. High demands were linked to increased emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation, while resources were positively related to personal accomplishment in both settings. Statistically significant group differences were observed: emotional exhaustion was negatively associated with work ability only in home care (β = − 0.58, p = .016), and paths from depersonalisation (p < .001) and personal accomplishment (p < .001) to work ability differed between settings.
Conclusions
Demands and resources shape burnout dimensions among long-term care employees. Similarities point to the potential of generic interventions, whereas differences in the relationships between burnout dimensions and work ability across settings underscore the need for setting-specific approaches. Further research should identify additional demands and resources and confirm these findings through longitudinal studies.
背景:需求和资源对护理人员职业倦怠和工作能力有显著影响,这是护理人员健康研究的重要结果。职业倦怠是一个多维度的结构,包括情绪衰竭、人格解体和由于长期工作压力而导致的个人成就感降低,而工作能力描述的是一个人在健康、技能和精神资源的情况下满足工作要求的能力。有证据表明,在不同的护理环境中,倦怠和工作能力的程度有所不同。然而,对长期护理中需求、资源、倦怠维度与工作能力之间关系的研究仍然有限。目的:通过评估工作需求-资源模型的测量不变性,考察需求、资源、倦怠维度与工作能力之间的关系,并比较长期护理和家庭护理环境下工作需求-资源维度与工作能力之间的关系,对改进后的工作需求-资源模型进行检验。设计:一种多组结构方程建模方法。参与者:301名在德国长期护理和家庭护理机构工作的员工。方法:采用多组结构方程模型对2019年11月- 12月住院护理和2020年9月- 10月家庭护理两项横断面研究的数据进行分析。应用测量不变性测试来验证两种设置之间的模型,并确定特定于设置的差异。结果:修正后的工作需求-资源模型在住宿和家庭护理环境中表现出测量不变性,证实了其在两种长期护理环境中的适用性。高要求与情绪耗竭和人格解体的增加有关,而资源与两种情况下的个人成就呈正相关。组间差异有统计学意义:情绪耗竭仅在家庭护理中与工作能力呈负相关(β = -0.58, p = 0.016),与人格解体路径呈负相关(p结论:需求和资源影响长期护理员工的倦怠维度。相似之处表明了通用干预措施的潜力,而不同环境下职业倦怠维度与工作能力之间关系的差异则强调了采用特定环境方法的必要性。进一步的研究应确定额外的需求和资源,并通过纵向研究证实这些发现。
{"title":"Demands, resources, burnout, and work ability in long-term care: A multi-group structural equation model comparing residential and home care","authors":"Michael Herz , Simon Blaschke , Doris Gebhard","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105255","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105255","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Demands and resources significantly influence burnout and work ability, which are critical outcomes in nursing workforce health research. Burnout is a multidimensional construct comprising emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment due to prolonged work-related stress, while work ability describes a worker's capacity to meet job demands given their health, skills, and mental resources. Evidence suggests that the extent of burnout and work ability varies across different care settings. However, research on the relationships between demands, resources, burnout dimensions, and work ability in the context of long-term care remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test a modified version of the Job Demands-Resources model by assessing measurement invariance and examining the relationships between demands, resources, burnout dimensions, and work ability, as well as comparing these relationships across residential long-term care and home care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A Multi-group Structural Equation Modelling approach.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>301 employees working in German residential long-term care and home care facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from two cross-sectional studies conducted in residential care (November–December 2019) and home care (September–October 2020) were analyzed using a multi-group structural equation model. Measurement invariance testing was applied to validate the model across both settings and to identify setting-specific differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The modified Job Demands-Resources model demonstrated measurement invariance across residential and home care settings, confirming its applicability in both long-term care settings. High demands were linked to increased emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation, while resources were positively related to personal accomplishment in both settings. Statistically significant group differences were observed: emotional exhaustion was negatively associated with work ability only in home care (<em>β</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.58, p = .016), and paths from depersonalisation (p < .001) and personal accomplishment (p < .001) to work ability differed between settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Demands and resources shape burnout dimensions among long-term care employees. Similarities point to the potential of generic interventions, whereas differences in the relationships between burnout dimensions and work ability across settings underscore the need for setting-specific approaches. Further research should identify additional demands and resources and confirm these findings through longitudinal studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105255"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-20DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105261
Oliver T. Nguyen , Alexandria Carey , Linsey M. Steege , Hwayoung Cho
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The electronic health record system is known to have usability issues, in part, because of a mismatch between the design of electronic health record workflows and the realities of how workflows occur in clinical practice. In response to reducing this mismatch, healthcare workers, including nurses, have developed and implemented electronic health record workarounds. However, the nature and contributors of these workarounds are loosely understood, particularly among nurses, who make up the most common type of electronic health record user.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>1) To identify and characterize electronic health record workarounds used by inpatient nurses, 2) to determine work system factors contributing to the need for these workarounds, and 3) to understand how different levels of electronic health record usability influence the need for these workarounds.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This study was a secondary analysis of a larger mixed-methods study on how electronic health record usability influences nursing documentation burden across flowsheets, medication administration records, care plans, notes, and admission-discharge-transfer navigators. The present study used a convergent design to re-examine the interview data and usability survey responses originally collected from 20 inpatient nurses at a teaching hospital. Semi-structured interview transcripts were inductively analyzed to identify unique workarounds and deductively analyzed to examine work system contributors. Documentation features were grouped based on above vs. below average overall usability scores and compared for unique workarounds and contributing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified eleven electronic health record workarounds, though some were used for specific documentation features rather than applied universally. All levels of the work system (e.g., electronic health record design, clinical environment) influenced nurses' needs for workarounds. Electronic health record usability levels influenced the specific workarounds used but not the work system contributors.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Electronic health record workarounds are context-dependent and future research should contextualize what feature or task the workarounds were used for. Although some workarounds exist because of clinical necessity (e.g., prioritizing decompensating patients over documentation), other workarounds occurred from work system issues (e.g., lack of declarative knowledge on where to document certain information, integration issues between the electronic health record and connected devices) that can be targets for future interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nurses' use of electronic health record workarounds is influenced by both electronic health record usability and the broader nursing work system. Future research is needed to quantify their frequency and assess their imp
{"title":"Characteristics and contributors to workarounds in the electronic health record system among inpatient nurses: Secondary analysis of a mixed-methods study","authors":"Oliver T. Nguyen , Alexandria Carey , Linsey M. Steege , Hwayoung Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105261","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The electronic health record system is known to have usability issues, in part, because of a mismatch between the design of electronic health record workflows and the realities of how workflows occur in clinical practice. In response to reducing this mismatch, healthcare workers, including nurses, have developed and implemented electronic health record workarounds. However, the nature and contributors of these workarounds are loosely understood, particularly among nurses, who make up the most common type of electronic health record user.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>1) To identify and characterize electronic health record workarounds used by inpatient nurses, 2) to determine work system factors contributing to the need for these workarounds, and 3) to understand how different levels of electronic health record usability influence the need for these workarounds.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This study was a secondary analysis of a larger mixed-methods study on how electronic health record usability influences nursing documentation burden across flowsheets, medication administration records, care plans, notes, and admission-discharge-transfer navigators. The present study used a convergent design to re-examine the interview data and usability survey responses originally collected from 20 inpatient nurses at a teaching hospital. Semi-structured interview transcripts were inductively analyzed to identify unique workarounds and deductively analyzed to examine work system contributors. Documentation features were grouped based on above vs. below average overall usability scores and compared for unique workarounds and contributing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified eleven electronic health record workarounds, though some were used for specific documentation features rather than applied universally. All levels of the work system (e.g., electronic health record design, clinical environment) influenced nurses' needs for workarounds. Electronic health record usability levels influenced the specific workarounds used but not the work system contributors.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Electronic health record workarounds are context-dependent and future research should contextualize what feature or task the workarounds were used for. Although some workarounds exist because of clinical necessity (e.g., prioritizing decompensating patients over documentation), other workarounds occurred from work system issues (e.g., lack of declarative knowledge on where to document certain information, integration issues between the electronic health record and connected devices) that can be targets for future interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nurses' use of electronic health record workarounds is influenced by both electronic health record usability and the broader nursing work system. Future research is needed to quantify their frequency and assess their imp","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105261"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-20DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105256
Kate Curtis , Margaret Murphy , Mary K. Lam , Belinda Kennedy , Ramon Z. Shaban , Margaret Fry , Christina Aggar , James Hughes , Hatem Alkhouri , Michael Dinh , Steven McPhail , Donna Waters , Julie Considine
Background
Patients admitted via Emergency Departments (EDs) sustain twice as many in-hospital adverse events than non-emergency admissions. Unwarranted variation in care, that is, differences not explained by patient illness, care needs, or patient preferences, contributes to adverse patient outcomes. The HIRAID® framework [History including Infection risk, Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, reassessment, and communication], standardises nursing assessment and management of patients in the ED. The aim of this study was to test the effect of HIRAID® on the quality and safety of emergency care.
Methods
A modified (staircase) stepped–wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 29 Australian metropolitan, regional, rural Emergency Departments involving 1377 nurses from June 2020 to February 2024. The 29 Emergency Departments were allocated to four clusters and randomised to one of four sequences, with three-six month intervention periods. HIRAID® was implemented with a multifaceted strategy comprising 21 behaviour change techniques including an education program, and modifications to nursing documentation. The primary outcome was inpatient deterioration as evidenced by a rapid response team call within 72 h of admission via ED. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of rapid response team calls where emergency nursing care was a contributor; time to first dose analgesia; patient/carer experience with emergency nursing care; and staff satisfaction with clinical handover. Contributing factors to 2211 inpatient rapid response team calls within 72 h of admission via emergency department were categorised using the Human Factors Classification Framework. Time to analgesia was extracted during medical record review (n = 1374). Patient experience (n = 2704) and clinical handover quality were measured using surveys (n = 1205 nurses). A regression approach was used to model the effect of HIRAID® implementation on primary outcomes adjusting for cluster effects and confounders.
Results
Of the 106,047 patients admitted via the ED, there were 2729 (1342 control, 1387 intervention) patients with a rapid response call within 72 h of admission. HIRAID® reduced the proportion of patients requiring a rapid response team call by 7.4 % (OR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.81–0.99) including 8.2 % fewer calls related to emergency nursing care (47 % to 38.8 %, OR = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.56–0.93). Patient experience improved in all measures, particularly feeling more informed (OR = 1.74, 95 % CI = 1.37–2.19). There was no change in time to first analgesia. There was a 7.0 % improvement in handover of relevant history (t = 5.57, p < 0.001) and physical assessment (t = 4.72, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Emergency nurses' use of HIRAID® significantly reduced
背景:通过急诊科(EDs)入院的患者在医院内发生的不良事件是非急诊科入院患者的两倍。无根据的护理差异,即不能由患者疾病、护理需求或患者偏好解释的差异,会导致不良的患者结果。HIRAID®框架(历史包括感染风险、危险信号、评估、干预、诊断、重新评估和沟通)规范了急诊科患者的护理评估和管理。本研究的目的是测试HIRAID®对急诊护理质量和安全的影响。方法于2020年6月至2024年2月在澳大利亚29个城市、地区和农村急诊科进行改进的(阶梯式)楔形聚类随机对照试验,涉及1377名护士。29个急诊科被分配到4个组,随机分配到4个序列中的一个,干预期为3 - 6个月。HIRAID®通过多方面的策略实施,包括21种行为改变技术,包括教育计划和护理文件的修改。主要结果是入院后72小时内通过急诊科的快速反应小组呼叫证明的住院情况恶化。次要结果是快速反应小组呼叫的比例,其中紧急护理是一个贡献;首次给药时间;患者/护理人员急救护理经验;员工对临床交接的满意度。使用人为因素分类框架对急诊部入院后72小时内2211次住院快速反应小组呼叫的促成因素进行了分类。在病历回顾期间提取镇痛时间(n = 1374)。采用问卷调查(n = 1205名护士)测量患者体验(n = 2704)和临床交接质量。采用回归方法对HIRAID®实施对主要结局的影响进行建模,调整集群效应和混杂因素。结果106047例急诊患者中,有2729例(对照组1342例,干预1387例)患者在入院后72 h内接到快速反应电话。HIRAID®将需要快速反应小组呼叫的患者比例降低了7.4% (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81-0.99),其中与紧急护理相关的呼叫减少了8.2%(47%至38.8%,OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.93)。患者体验在所有测量中都得到改善,特别是感觉更了解情况(OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.37-2.19)。第一次镇痛的时间没有变化。相关病史移交(t = 5.57, p < 0.001)和体格评估(t = 4.72, p < 0.001)改善了7.0%。结论急诊护士使用HIRAID®可显著减少住院患者病情恶化,并改善患者体验和临床交接的感知质量。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心2021年10月25日,(ACTRN12621001456842),招募于2020年11月6日开始。社交媒体摘要:实施HIRAID®可减少患者病情恶化。更多信息请点击#HIRAID。
{"title":"Reducing inpatient deterioration and improving patient safety in emergency departments with a standardised nursing framework: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial","authors":"Kate Curtis , Margaret Murphy , Mary K. Lam , Belinda Kennedy , Ramon Z. Shaban , Margaret Fry , Christina Aggar , James Hughes , Hatem Alkhouri , Michael Dinh , Steven McPhail , Donna Waters , Julie Considine","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105256","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105256","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients admitted via Emergency Departments (EDs) sustain twice as many in-hospital adverse events than non-emergency admissions. Unwarranted variation in care, that is, differences not explained by patient illness, care needs, or patient preferences, contributes to adverse patient outcomes. The HIRAID® framework [<strong>H</strong>istory including <strong>I</strong>nfection risk, <strong>R</strong>ed flags, <strong>A</strong>ssessment, <strong>I</strong>nterventions, <strong>D</strong>iagnostics, reassessment, and communication], standardises nursing assessment and management of patients in the ED. The aim of this study was to test the effect of HIRAID® on the quality and safety of emergency care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A modified (staircase) stepped–wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 29 Australian metropolitan, regional, rural Emergency Departments involving 1377 nurses from June 2020 to February 2024. The 29 Emergency Departments were allocated to four clusters and randomised to one of four sequences, with three-six month intervention periods. HIRAID® was implemented with a multifaceted strategy comprising 21 behaviour change techniques including an education program, and modifications to nursing documentation. The primary outcome was inpatient deterioration as evidenced by a rapid response team call within 72 h of admission via ED. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of rapid response team calls where emergency nursing care was a contributor; time to first dose analgesia; patient/carer experience with emergency nursing care; and staff satisfaction with clinical handover. Contributing factors to 2211 inpatient rapid response team calls within 72 h of admission via emergency department were categorised using the Human Factors Classification Framework. Time to analgesia was extracted during medical record review (n = 1374). Patient experience (n = 2704) and clinical handover quality were measured using surveys (n = 1205 nurses). A regression approach was used to model the effect of HIRAID® implementation on primary outcomes adjusting for cluster effects and confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 106,047 patients admitted via the ED, there were 2729 (1342 control, 1387 intervention) patients with a rapid response call within 72 h of admission. HIRAID® reduced the proportion of patients requiring a rapid response team call by 7.4 % (OR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.81–0.99) including 8.2 % fewer calls related to emergency nursing care (47 % to 38.8 %, OR = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.56–0.93). Patient experience improved in all measures, particularly feeling more informed (OR = 1.74, 95 % CI = 1.37–2.19). There was no change in time to first analgesia. There was a 7.0 % improvement in handover of relevant history (t = 5.57, p < 0.001) and physical assessment (t = 4.72, p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Emergency nurses' use of HIRAID® significantly reduced","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105256"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145424970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105252
Beibei Duan , Leyang Liu , Cunhao Ma , Zhe Liu , Baohua Gou , Weiwei Liu
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common pregnancy complication with rising incidence worldwide. Traditional interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus prevention often lack accessibility and personalization. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, particularly smartphone apps, provide an innovative solution. They enable real-time, personalized care by tracking key health metrics, delivering user-specific dynamic feedback, and offering customized lifestyle plans. This approach addresses traditional limitations and presents a more effective, accessible gestational diabetes mellitus prevention strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile health management model, based on a gestational diabetes prevention app, in preventing gestational diabetes mellitus and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized controlled trial, pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus before 12 weeks of gestation were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Beijing. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group receiving standard care, or an intervention group receiving additional support via a mHealth model using the ‘<em>Better Pregnancy</em>’ app. A gestational diabetes mellitus risk group health management team was established, led by 3 diabetes specialist nurses, 1 doctor, 1 dietitian, 1 psychologist, and several volunteers. Outcomes included the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test values at 24 weeks of gestation, self-management ability, self-efficacy, perceived social support, pregnancy weight gain, delivery complications, and neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 246 pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus were enrolled, including 124 in the control group and 122 in the intervention group. Compared to the control group, the intervention group had a lower incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9 % vs. 33.9 %), lower glucose tolerance test values (fasting: 4.47 ± 0.36 vs. 4.61 ± 0.51, 1-hour postprandial: 7.74 ± 1.54 vs. 8.29 ± 1.82, 2-hour postprandial: 6.85 ± 1.28 vs. 7.32 ± 1.64), and lower HbA1c levels (4.81 ± 0.32 vs. 4.98 ± 0.35). The intervention group also had reduced insulin use (0 % vs. 8.3 %) and hospitalizations rate due to poor blood glucose control (2.1 % vs. 14.5 %). Besides, the intervention group showed improved general self-efficacy, self-management, and perceived social support scores than the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the intervention significantly reduced the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.424, 95 % CI: 0.217–0.827, <em>P</em> = 0.012). Higher pre-pregnancy BMI and history of gestational diabetes mellitus were identified as risk factors for ges
{"title":"Effects of mobile health management model on the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Beibei Duan , Leyang Liu , Cunhao Ma , Zhe Liu , Baohua Gou , Weiwei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105252","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105252","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common pregnancy complication with rising incidence worldwide. Traditional interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus prevention often lack accessibility and personalization. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, particularly smartphone apps, provide an innovative solution. They enable real-time, personalized care by tracking key health metrics, delivering user-specific dynamic feedback, and offering customized lifestyle plans. This approach addresses traditional limitations and presents a more effective, accessible gestational diabetes mellitus prevention strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile health management model, based on a gestational diabetes prevention app, in preventing gestational diabetes mellitus and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized controlled trial, pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus before 12 weeks of gestation were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Beijing. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group receiving standard care, or an intervention group receiving additional support via a mHealth model using the ‘<em>Better Pregnancy</em>’ app. A gestational diabetes mellitus risk group health management team was established, led by 3 diabetes specialist nurses, 1 doctor, 1 dietitian, 1 psychologist, and several volunteers. Outcomes included the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test values at 24 weeks of gestation, self-management ability, self-efficacy, perceived social support, pregnancy weight gain, delivery complications, and neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 246 pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus were enrolled, including 124 in the control group and 122 in the intervention group. Compared to the control group, the intervention group had a lower incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9 % vs. 33.9 %), lower glucose tolerance test values (fasting: 4.47 ± 0.36 vs. 4.61 ± 0.51, 1-hour postprandial: 7.74 ± 1.54 vs. 8.29 ± 1.82, 2-hour postprandial: 6.85 ± 1.28 vs. 7.32 ± 1.64), and lower HbA1c levels (4.81 ± 0.32 vs. 4.98 ± 0.35). The intervention group also had reduced insulin use (0 % vs. 8.3 %) and hospitalizations rate due to poor blood glucose control (2.1 % vs. 14.5 %). Besides, the intervention group showed improved general self-efficacy, self-management, and perceived social support scores than the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the intervention significantly reduced the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.424, 95 % CI: 0.217–0.827, <em>P</em> = 0.012). Higher pre-pregnancy BMI and history of gestational diabetes mellitus were identified as risk factors for ges","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105252"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145357854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105253
Isaac Amankwaa , Cathy Liu , Jacqui Coates-Harris , Mellisa Chin , Sharon Brownie , Patricia McClunie-Trust
Background
The implementation of New Zealand's End-of-Life Choice Act 2019 provides a unique lens for examining the early-stage implementation of assisted dying policy. As legislation expands globally, nurses are emerging as central yet under-examined actors in delivering assisted dying care. This review addresses the urgent need to understand how nursing roles evolve in newly legalised contexts.
Objective
This scoping review aimed to understand the experiences, roles, and challenges faced by registered nurses and nurse practitioners in delivering assisted dying services under the End-of-Life Choice Act in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Method
The scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. A systematic search was performed across ProQuest Central, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL to identify literature published between 2021 and 2025. Two screened the articles and extracted the data. A convergent, segregated approach was used for thematic synthesis.
Results
Nineteen studies were included, spanning anticipatory commentary and experiential data after the End-of-Life Choice Act came into force. Four themes were identified. First, evolving nursing roles revealed fragmentation: nurse practitioners administer life-ending medication but remain excluded from eligibility assessments. In contrast, registered nurses act as frontline coordinators yet are legally barred from initiating discussions. Experiential accounts added unanticipated burdens, including family management, logistical coordination, and supporting colleagues without formal preparation. Second, ethical dimensions extended beyond legal safeguards. Anticipatory sources predicted value conflicts, while experiential studies described lived moral distress, fractured team dynamics from conscientious objection, and confidentiality risks in small communities. Third, preparedness and support showed a marked gap. While early literature assumed structured training and clear guidance, experiential findings reported uneven preparation, reliance on informal peer networks, and culturally unsafe or absent emotional support. Debriefing was valued but inconsistently delivered. Finally, contextual variations shaped implementation. Hospices diverged between integration and resistance, aged residential care exposed nurses to family conflict and role ambiguity, rural practice intensified inequities and professional isolation, and community nurses often became central coordinators of home-based deaths. Māori perspectives were largely absent.
Conclusions
New Zealand's assisted dying policy creates a fragmented framework for nursing roles, confirmed by anticipatory projections and lived experience. This contrasts with integrated approaches in countries such as Canada, while also exposing gaps in preparedness, ethical support, and cultural responsiveness. Addressing these challenges
{"title":"Evolving nursing roles in assisted dying services in New Zealand: A scoping review","authors":"Isaac Amankwaa , Cathy Liu , Jacqui Coates-Harris , Mellisa Chin , Sharon Brownie , Patricia McClunie-Trust","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The implementation of New Zealand's End-of-Life Choice Act 2019 provides a unique lens for examining the early-stage implementation of assisted dying policy. As legislation expands globally, nurses are emerging as central yet under-examined actors in delivering assisted dying care. This review addresses the urgent need to understand how nursing roles evolve in newly legalised contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review aimed to understand the experiences, roles, and challenges faced by registered nurses and nurse practitioners in delivering assisted dying services under the End-of-Life Choice Act in Aotearoa New Zealand.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. A systematic search was performed across ProQuest Central, Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL to identify literature published between 2021 and 2025. Two screened the articles and extracted the data. A convergent, segregated approach was used for thematic synthesis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen studies were included, spanning anticipatory commentary and experiential data after the End-of-Life Choice Act came into force. Four themes were identified. First, evolving nursing roles revealed fragmentation: nurse practitioners administer life-ending medication but remain excluded from eligibility assessments. In contrast, registered nurses act as frontline coordinators yet are legally barred from initiating discussions. Experiential accounts added unanticipated burdens, including family management, logistical coordination, and supporting colleagues without formal preparation. Second, ethical dimensions extended beyond legal safeguards. Anticipatory sources predicted value conflicts, while experiential studies described lived moral distress, fractured team dynamics from conscientious objection, and confidentiality risks in small communities. Third, preparedness and support showed a marked gap. While early literature assumed structured training and clear guidance, experiential findings reported uneven preparation, reliance on informal peer networks, and culturally unsafe or absent emotional support. Debriefing was valued but inconsistently delivered. Finally, contextual variations shaped implementation. Hospices diverged between integration and resistance, aged residential care exposed nurses to family conflict and role ambiguity, rural practice intensified inequities and professional isolation, and community nurses often became central coordinators of home-based deaths. Māori perspectives were largely absent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>New Zealand's assisted dying policy creates a fragmented framework for nursing roles, confirmed by anticipatory projections and lived experience. This contrasts with integrated approaches in countries such as Canada, while also exposing gaps in preparedness, ethical support, and cultural responsiveness. Addressing these challenges ","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105253"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145357853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}