Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology最新文献

Background Plantar keratoderma is a common finding in pachyonychia congenita, significantly impairing ambulation and quality of life. Due to the variation of pain reporting in pachyonychia congenita clinical studies, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of treatment outcomes for painful plantar keratodermas. Objectives To objectively analyse associations between plantar pain and activity levels in pachyonychia congenita patients using a wristband tracker. Methods Pachyonychia congenita patients and matched normal controls wore wristband activity trackers and completed a daily digital survey to record their highest and total pain scores (0-10 scale) each day for 28 consecutive days during four different seasons. Results Twenty four participants (12 pachyonychia congenita patients and 12 matched normal controls) completed the study. Pachyonychia congenita patients walked 1801.30 fewer steps/day (95% CI, -3666.4, 64.1) than normal controls (P = 0.072) and had greater average total [5.26; SD, 2.10] and highest (6.92; SD, 2.35) daily pain than normal controls [0.11 (SD, 0.47), 0.30 (SD, 0.22), respectively] (P < 0.001, both). On average, for each one unit increase in daily highest pain level, pachyonychia congenita activity decreased 71.54 steps/day (SE, 38.90, P = 0.066). Limitation The study had a small number of participants, limiting statistical power. Only pachyonychia congenita patients, ages 18 years or older, with keratin 6a, keratin 16, and keratin 17 mutations were included, limiting generalizability. Conclusion Pachyonychia congenita patients were less active with significantly higher pain than normal controls. There was an inverse correlation between pain and activity. Our findings suggest that wristband tracker technology may be used to evaluate treatment efficacy in future trials on severe plantar pain; therapeutic interventions that decrease plantar pain should correlate with significant increases in activity using wristband trackers.

Background Switching of biologics in patients has become common in clinical practice. Objectives This study investigated the reasons for and effectiveness of switching biologic agents during the treatment of psoriasis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with psoriasis who were treated with biologics at Pusan National University Hospital and Chosun University Hospital from March 2012 to June 2020. We assessed their demographics and treatment characteristics (reasons for switching biologics and efficacy of the first- and second biologic agents). Results Of the 162 psoriatic patients treated with biologic agents for more than 52 weeks, 35 required a switch to another biologic agent. The reasons for switching biologic agents were inefficacy (n = 30), adverse events (n = 2) and others (n = 3). The mean psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score was 12.1 at the start of the second biologic and 3.4 at 14-16 weeks later. Patients were more likely to switch to another biologic agent when they exhibited a high initial psoriasis area and severity index score and concomitant psoriatic arthritis. Limitations As a retrospective study, there were some limitations such as lack of a placebo control group and the time point of 14-16 weeks being somewhat early to judge the effect of the biologics. Conclusions The most common reason for switching biologic agents in Korea was treatment inefficacy, especially secondary failure. Despite the inefficacy of previous biologic agents, switching to a different agent may be an efficacious approach.

The Janus kinase (JAK) and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) pathway has been identified as a key player in the pathophysiology of alopecia areata and a potential target for therapy. Here, we give a narrative review of what is known about Janus kinase inhibitors in alopecia areata. Several clinical trials as well as smaller studies have demonstrated hair regrowth and remission with oral Janus kinase inhibitors therapy, even in patients who failed conventional treatment. Baricitinib is the only US FDA-approved treatment for alopecia areata but data for other oral Janus kinase inhibitors such as tofacitinib, ruxolitinib and ritlecitinib are also promising. Fewer clinical trials have investigated topical Janus kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata, with many of them terminated early due to unfavourable results. Overall, Janus kinase inhibitors are an efficacious addition to the therapeutic arsenal for treatment-refractory alopecia areata. Further work is needed to examine the effects of long-term usage of Janus kinase inhibitors, the efficacy of topical Janus kinase inhibitors, as well as to identify biomarkers that could predict differential therapeutic responses to the various Janus kinase inhibitors.