Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology最新文献

Background Cold urticaria (ColdU) is classified as a subtype of chronic inducible urticaria characterised by recurring pruritic wheals and/or angioedema upon exposure to cold stimuli. However, very limited data is available on ColdU specifically among Indians. Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the clinico-epidemiological characteristics and treatment response in North Indian patients diagnosed with ColdU. Materials and Methods The clinical records of patients diagnosed with ColdU past 5 years (January 2018 to December 2022) were retrospectively reviewed. Data including patient demographics, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and treatment response were collected and analysed. Results Among the 1780 urticaria patients included in our study, only 15 cases of cold-induced urticaria were identified. ColdU was classified as typical in all but three patients. The mean age of affected individuals was 36 ± 18 years (20-65 years) and eight patients (53.3%) were males. Mean disease duration at presentation was 18 ± 27 months (3 months-4 years). Two patients experienced cold-induced angioedema and one patient had hypotensive episodes following cold exposure. Twelve patients demonstrated positive results in the ice cube provocation test. Of 15, only 6 (40%) achieved complete control of symptoms with standard dosing of second generation anti-histamines while six patients (40%) required titration to higher doses and three patients (20%) were initiated on cyclosporine therapy, resulting in remission. Limitations Retrospective study design and possibility of selection bias. Conclusion Due to India's predominantly tropical climate, ColdU prevails at lower levels compared to the western regions. ColdU is likely underdiagnosed in India, possibly dismissed as chronic spontaneous urticaria. The management of ColdU involves a combination of protective measures against cold exposure and the use of anti-histamines to control disease activity. This retrospective study provides valuable insights into the clinico-epidemiological characteristics and treatment response of north Indian patients with ColdU.

Background In the pathophysiology of bullous pemphigoid, besides IgG, there has been evidence that supports the role of IgE antibodies. However, there have been no studies to evaluate total serum IgE levels or detect IgE deposits in the skin of Vietnamese patients. Aim To analyse the association between IgE levels in the serum and disease severity as well as eosinophils and IgE basement membrane zone (BMZ) deposition in Vietnamese bullous bullous pemphigoid patients. Methods A single-centre observational research on 35 newly diagnosed and untreated bullous bullous pemphigoid patients. Total serum IgE levels were analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For controls, we collected sera of 30 pemphigus patients and 30 elderly patients with pruritus. Perilesional skin biopsies underwent direct immunofluorescence (DIF) staining, with biopsies of pemphigus patients as controls. Results Elevated total serum IgE was observed in 60% of bullous pemphigoid patients, the percentage in the pemphigus group and pruritus group was 20% and 40%, respectively. The mean total serum IgE level among the bullous pemphigoid group was higher than that of the pemphigus group (123.3 ± 102.4 IU/mL vs. 64.3 ± 45.1 IU/mL, p = 0.010). Total serum IgE levels of bullous pemphigoid patients correlated with higher eosinophil counts (r = 0.61; p = 0.018) and urticaria/erythema (U/E) Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) score (r = 0.50; p = 0.035). Among 35 bullous pemphigoid patients, 5 patients showed positive IgE DIF staining, accounting for 14.3%. Higher serum IgE levels correlated with the deposition of IgE in patients' perilesional skin (p = 0.037). Limitations Due to the rarity of bullous pemphigoid, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, and self-treatment issues in Vietnam, we could not recruit a larger number of participants. Conclusions Total serum IgE values correlated with urticarial lesions and IgE deposition in perilesional skin of Vietnamese bullous pemphigoid patients. IgE autoantibodies present in the skin of bullous pemphigoid patients support the role of IgE in bullous pemphigoid pathogenesis.

Systemic immunosuppressants are the mainstay of treatment for pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), but they generally have significant side effects which may be avoided by limiting treatment to topical therapy. This review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of topical treatments for PG. An extensive literature search identified nineteen suitable publications for analysis, including two open cohort studies, five case series and twelve single case reports. The quality of evidence in the publications was graded and data relating to topical PG treatment was extracted. The lack of randomised clinical trials investigating topical monotherapy for PG means that robust statistical analysis was not possible. The greatest weight of the current evidence for topical therapy favours either corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. According to our review, both these options appear well tolerated with a few side effects and may have similar efficacy in speeding up the resolution of PG ulcers. Topical therapy could be considered for use in combination with systemic treatment. There may also be a role for isolated topical monotherapy in selected patients with PG, especially those with early or mild disease and those with idiopathic PG. However further research is needed to confirm this and establish optimal treatment approaches for this condition.

Pain is frequently encountered in dermatology practice, which impairs the activities of daily living, adds to psychological morbidity, and therefore compromises the quality of life. It ranges from mild to severe in intensity across various dermatoses and requires prompt addressal and treatment. Diseases such as extensive pemphigus vulgaris and Stevens-Johnson syndrome are especially painful and require a multidisciplinary approach with the involvement of a pain specialist in their management. The main pathogenic types of pain include visceral nociceptive, somatic nociceptive, and neuropathic types, the latter two being most relevant in dermatological disorders. Somatic nociceptive pain is often seen in patients of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/ Toxic epidermal necrolysis, epidermolysis bullosa, pemphigus vulgaris, erythema nodosum, and hidradenitis suppurativa, while neuropathic pain is part of the disease process in dermatoses like leprosy, herpes zoster, and dysesthesia syndromes. Therapeutic approaches to pain management include the use of non-opioids (acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents), opioids, and non-pharmacological therapies, along with appropriate management of the underlying dermatosis. World Health Organisation (WHO) analgesic ladder remains the most commonly employed guideline for the management of pain, although treatment needs individualisation depending on the nature and severity of pain (acute/chronic), type of dermatosis, and patient factors. There is a paucity of literature pertaining to pain management in dermatology and this topic is often neglected due to a lack of awareness and knowledge of the topic. The present review aims to discuss the pain pathway, various painful conditions in the setting of medical dermatology practice, and their management along with relevant pharmacology of the commonly used analgesics.