European Journal of Internal Medicine最新文献

Healthcare systems face multiple challenges arising from demographic factors (population aging) and epidemiological factors (rise of chronic diseases and patients with multimorbidity) as well as threats to their financial sustainability when maintaining equitable access to medical and technological advances. Current healthcare models, based on specialized medical care, lead to fragmented care that can be harmful to the patient and is inefficient for the system due to the overuse of redundant, low-value medical acts. Internal medicine is the hospital-centered general medical specialty par excellence, providing a comprehensive and holistic vision that is centered on the patient and not on the disease. Internists should be the leading physicians in the hospital setting for complex patients with or those with an uncertain diagnosis. Internists must play a key role, as hospitalists do, in the continued care of acute patients hospitalized for medical or surgical diseases, establishing shared care models in multidisciplinary teams. Likewise, to guarantee continuity of care for chronic patients, internists must establish mechanisms for collaboration with primary care and nursing, participating in the development of new out-of-hospital care models that use the available technological resources. Internal medicine should play a leading role in graduate and postgraduate medical education to promote a holistic vision among medical students and residents in medical subspecialties.

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is an important driver of both morbidity and mortality on a global scale. Elucidating social inequalities may help to identify vulnerable groups as well as treatment imbalances and guide efforts to improve care for MI.

Methods: All hospitalized patient-cases with confirmed MI 2005-2020 in Germany were included in the study and stratified for socioeconomic or psychosocial factors (SPF) and the impact of SPF on treatment usage and adverse in-hospital events was analyzed.

Results: Overall, 4,409,597 hospitalizations of MI patients were included; of these, 17,297 (0.4 %) were coded with SPF. These patients were more often of female sex (49.4 % vs. 36.9 %, P<0.001), older (median 77.0 [IQR: 65.0-84.0] vs. 73.0 [62.0-81.0] years, P<0.001) and revealed an aggravated cardiovascular profile. Although SPF were independently associated with increased usage of cardiac catheterization (OR 1.174 [95 %CI 1.136-1.212]) and percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 1.167 [95 %CI 1.130-1.205]), they were accompanied by higher risk for a prolonged length of in-hospital stay >7 days (OR 1.236 [95 %CI 1.198-1.276]) and >10 days (OR 1.296 [95 %CI 1.254-1.339]). While SPF were associated with increased risk for deep venous thrombosis and/or thrombophlebitis (OR 1.634 [95 %CI 1.427-1.870]), pulmonary embolism (OR 1.337 [95 %CI 1.149-1.555]), and acute renal failure (OR 1.170 [95 %CI 1.105-1.240), these SPF were inversely associated with in-hospital case-fatality (OR 0.461 [95 %CI 0.433-0.490]).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SPF in hospitalized MI patients have significant impacts on treatments and outcomes. Fortunately, our data did not revealed an underuse of interventional treatments in MI patients with SPF.

Aims: To assess diabetes-related emotional distress (DD) in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess a group-based intervention's impact.

Methods: To investigate DD we used data from the Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire comprising 20 items (PAID-20). Furthermore, changes in the WHO Well-Being Index comprising five items (WHO-5) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were analysed. The intervention was evaluated using follow-up data from the emerging adults who participated.

Results: From 2021 to 2023, we screened 180 emerging adults using PAID-20. DD (PAID-20≥30) was prevalent in 25.0 % (95 % CI 18.9; 32.0 %), and associated with the female sex, higher HbA1c and WHO-5 < 50. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at baseline was associated with PAID-20<30. 21 individuals attended a group-based intervention. At one-week follow up PAID-20 was reduced (29.1 ± 15.4 vs. 41.3 ± 12.1 at baseline, p = 0.003), and at nine-twelve months' follow-up HbA1c was reduced (59.3 ± 15.3 mmol/mol vs. 68.0 ± 17.4 mmol/mol at baseline, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that 25 % of the investigated emerging adults with T1D experienced DD (PAID-20≥30) associated with four clinical factors. We found a reduction in HbA1c and a short-term reduction in PAID-20 following the group-based intervention.

Background: In patients complaining common symptoms such as chest/abdominal/back pain or syncope, acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are rare underlying causes. AAS diagnosis requires urgent advanced aortic imaging (AAI), mostly computed tomography angiography. However, patient selection for AAI poses conflicting risks of misdiagnosis and overtesting.

Objectives: We assessed the safety and efficiency of a diagnostic protocol integrating clinical data with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and d-dimer (single/age-adjusted cutoff), to select patients for AAI.

Methods: This prospective study involved 12 Emergency Departments from 5 countries. POCUS findings were integrated with a guideline-compliant clinical score, to define the integrated pre-test probability (iPTP) of AAS. If iPTP was high, urgent AAI was requested. If iPTP was low and d-dimer was negative, AAS was ruled out. Patients were followed for 30 days, to adjudicate outcomes.

Results: Within 1979 enrolled patients, 176 (9 %) had an AAS. POCUS led to net reclassification improvement of 20 % (24 %/-4 % for events/non-events, P < 0.001) over clinical score alone. Median time to AAS diagnosis was 60 min if POCUS was positive vs 118 if negative (P = 0.042). Within 941 patients satisfying rule-out criteria, the 30-day incidence of AAS was 0 % (95 % CI, 0-0.41 %); without POCUS, 2 AAS were potentially missed. Protocol rule-out efficiency was 48 % (95 % CI, 46-50 %) and AAI was averted in 41 % of patients. Using age-adjusted d-dimer, rule-out efficiency was 54 % (difference 6 %, 95 % CI, 4-9 %, vs standard cutoff).

Conclusions: The integrated algorithm allowed rapid triage of high-probability patients, while providing safe and efficient rule-out of AAS. Age-adjusted d-dimer maximized efficiency.

Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04430400.

Background: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), is a rare ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis. Its overlapping features with other vasculitic or eosinophilic diseases, and the wide and heterogeneous range of clinical manifestations, often result in a delay to diagnosis.

Objective: To identify red flags that raise a suspicion of EGPA to prompt diagnostic testing and to present an evidence-based clinical checklist tool for use in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Systematic literature review and expert consensus to identify a list of red flags based on clinical judgement. GRADE applied to generate a strength of recommendation for each red flag and to develop a checklist tool.

Results: 86 studies were included. 40 red flags were identified as relevant to raise a suspicion of EGPA and assessed by the experts as being clinically significant. Experts agreed that a diagnosis of EGPA should be considered in a patient aged ≥6 years with a blood eosinophil level >1000 cells/µL if untreated and >500 cells/µL if previously treated with any medication likely to have altered the blood eosinophil count. The presence of asthma and/or nasal polyposis should reinforce a suspicion of EGPA. Red flags of asthma, lung infiltrates, pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, polyneuropathy, biopsy with inflammatory eosinophilic infiltrates, palpable purpura, digital ischaemia and ANCA positivity, usually anti-myeloperoxidase, among others, were identified.

Conclusion: The identification of a comprehensive set of red flags could be used to raise a suspicion of EGPA in patients with eosinophilia, providing clinicians with an evidence-based checklist tool that can be integrated into their practice.

Introduction: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently have cardiovascular comorbidities, increasing the risk of hospitalised COPD exacerbations (H-ECOPDs) or death. This pragmatic study examined the effects of adding an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to long-acting bronchodilator(s) (LABDs) in patients with COPD and cardiac comorbidities who had a recent H-ECOPD.

Methods: Patients >60 years of age with COPD and ≥1 cardiac comorbidity, within 6 months after discharge following an H-ECOPD, were randomised to receive LABD(s) with or without ICS, and were followed for 1 year. The primary outcome was the time to first rehospitalisation and/or all-cause death.

Results: The planned number of patients was not recruited (803/1032), limiting the strength of the conclusions. In the intention-to-treat population, 89/403 patients (22.1 %) were rehospitalised or died in the LABD group (probability 0.257 [95 % confidence interval 0.206, 0.318]), vs 85/400 (21.3 %) in the LABD+ICS group (0.249 [0.198, 0.310]), with no difference between groups in time-to-event (hazard ratio 1.116 [0.827, 1.504]; p = 0.473). All-cause and cardiovascular mortality were lower in patients receiving LABD(s)+ICS, with relative reductions of 19.7 % and 27.4 %, respectively (9.8 % vs 12.2 % and 4.5 % vs 6.2 %), although the groups were not formally statistically compared for these endpoints. Fewer patients had adverse events in the LABD+ICS group (43.0 % vs 50.4 %; p = 0.013), with 4.9 % vs 5.4 % reporting pneumonia adverse events.

Conclusions: Results suggest addition of ICS to LABDs did not reduce the time-to-combined rehospitalisation/death, although it decreased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. ICS use was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events, particularly pneumonia.