European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing最新文献

Aims: This systematic review assesses the organizational well-being of nurses working in cardiovascular settings and identifies environmental variables influencing it.

Methods and results: The Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines have been followed. The search was conducted, from the database inception up to and including 1 December 2022, on Medline (via PubMed), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Critical appraisal and data extraction were conducted using standardized tools. Six articles of high quality were included. These mostly concerned cross-sectional studies, conducted in heterogeneous contexts, which highlight the peculiarity of the cardiovascular nursing setting. Three thematic areas were identified: stressors of cardiovascular settings; outcomes of stressors on nurses; and coping strategies used by cardiovascular nurses to deal with such stress factors. Identified stress factors included a lack of autonomy, conflicts between professional and family roles, high workloads, and stressful relationships with patients and caregivers. These organizational variables could generate nurses' burnout, depression, irritability, and/or sleep disorders. In trying to cope with such stressors, cardiovascular nurses used different strategies for compensating, avoiding, escaping, or ignoring the problem, or, in other cases, became somewhat aggressive.

Conclusion: Considering the limited data, cardiovascular nursing coping strategies should be further investigated, so that effective pathways for preventing or limiting stress factors can be identified and applied by the organizations. Monitoring and intervening on stress factors in this care setting could improve cardiovascular nurses' organizational well-being and accordingly patients' outcomes.

Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022355669.

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) symptom relief is a primary indication for catheter ablation, but AF symptom resolution is not well characterized. The study objective was to describe AF symptom documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) pre- and post-ablation and identify correlates of post-ablation symptoms.

Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using EHRs of patients with AF (n = 1293), undergoing ablation in a large, urban health system from 2010 to 2020. We extracted symptom data from clinical notes using a natural language processing algorithm (F score: 0.81). We used Cochran's Q tests with post-hoc McNemar's tests to determine differences in symptom prevalence pre- and post-ablation. We used logistic regression models to estimate the adjusted odds of symptom resolution by personal or clinical characteristics at 6 and 12 months post-ablation. In fully adjusted models, at 12 months post-ablation patients, patients with heart failure had significantly lower odds of dyspnoea resolution [odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.57], oedema resolution (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.56), and fatigue resolution (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.85), but higher odds of palpitations resolution (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.25-2.89) compared with those without heart failure. Age 65 and older, female sex, Black or African American race, smoking history, and antiarrhythmic use were also associated with lower odds of resolution of specific symptoms at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion: The post-ablation symptom patterns are heterogeneous. Findings warrant confirmation with larger, more representative data sets, which may be informative for patients whose primary goal for undergoing an ablation is symptom relief.

Aims: We sought to explore the latent classifications of psychosocial adaptation in young and middle-aged patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and analyse the characteristics of different profiles of AMI patients.

Methods and results: A cross-sectional study was performed in 438 Chinese young and middle-aged patients with AMI. The investigation time was 1 month after discharge. Three different self-report instruments were distributed to the participants, including the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Social Support Rating Scale. The seven dimensions of the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale were then used to perform a latent profile analysis. All participants signed informed consent forms in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Finally, a total of 411 young and middle-aged AMI patients were enrolled. Three distinct profiles were identified, including the 'well-adapted group' (44.8%), 'highlight in psychological burdens group' (25.5%), and 'poorly adapted group' (29.7%). The influencing factors included stress perception, social support, occupational type, and marital status (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged AMI patients can be divided into three profiles. Clinical nurses can carry out individualized psychological interventions according to the characteristics of patients in different potential profiles to improve the psychosocial adaptation of patients and the prognosis of their disease.

Aims: We aimed to recruit a representative cohort of women and men with multi-morbid chronic heart disease as part of a trial testing an innovative, nurse-co-ordinated, multi-faceted intervention to lower rehospitalization and death by addressing areas of vulnerability to external challenges to their health.

Methods and results: The prospective, randomized open, blinded end-point RESILIENCE Trial recruited 203 hospital inpatients (mean age 75.7 ± 10.2 years) of whom 51% were women and 94% had combined coronary artery disease, heart failure, and/or atrial fibrillation. Levels of concurrent multi-morbidity were high (mean Charlson Index of Comorbidity Score 6.5 ± 2.7), and 8.9% had at least mild frailty according to the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale. Including the index admission, 19-20% of women and men had a pre-existing pattern of seasonally linked hospitalization (seasonality). Detailed phenotyping revealed that 48% of women and 40% of men had ≥3 physiological factors, and 15% of women and 16% of men had ≥3 behavioural factors likely to increase their vulnerability to external provocations to their health. Overall, 61-62% of women and men had ≥4 combined factors indicative of such vulnerability. Additional factors such as reliance on the public health system (63 vs. 49%), lower education (30 vs. 14%), and living alone (48 vs. 29%) were more prevalent in women.

Conclusion: We successfully recruited women and men with multi-morbid chronic heart disease and bio-behavioural indicators of vulnerability to external provocations to their health. Once completed, the RESILIENCE TRIAL will provide important insights on the impact of addressing such vulnerability (promoting resilience) on subsequent health outcomes.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.org: NCT04614428.

Aims: Women are underrepresented in cardiovascular trials. We sought to explore the proportional representation of women in contemporary cardiovascular research and the factors (barriers and enablers) that affect their participation in cardiovascular studies.

Methods and results: Multiple electronic databases were searched between January 2011 and September 2021 to identify papers that defined underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular research and/or reported sex-based differences in participating in cardiovascular research and/or barriers for women to participate in cardiovascular research. Data extraction was undertaken independently by two authors using a standardised data collection form. Results were summarised using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis as appropriate.From 548 identified papers, 10 papers were included. Of those, four were conducted prospectively and six were retrospective studies. Five of the retrospective studies involved secondary analysis of trial data including over 780 trials in over 1.1 million participants. Overall, women were reported to be underrepresented in heart failure, coronary disease, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmia trials, compared to men. Barriers to participation included lack of information and understanding of the research, trial-related procedures, the perceived health status of the participant, and patient-specific factors including travel, childcare availability, and cost. A significantly higher likelihood of research participation was reported by women following a patient educational intervention.

Conclusion: This review has highlighted the underrepresentation of women in a range of cardiovascular trials. Several barriers to women's participation in cardiovascular studies were identified. Researchers could mitigate against these in future trial planning and delivery to increase women's participation in cardiovascular research.

Registration: The protocol was published on the public Open Science Framework platform on 13th August 2021 (no registration reference provided) and can be accessed at https://osf.io/ny4fd/.

Aims: The aims of this study were to: (i) test if there are clusters of stroke survivors who experience distinct trajectories of quality of life (QOL) from hospital rehabilitation discharge to 12-month follow-up; (ii) test if any sociodemographic or clinical variables predict this class membership; and (iii) examine the associations between the clusters of stroke survivors' and their caregivers' trajectories of anxiety, depression, and burden over time.

Methods and results: A total of 415 stroke survivors and their caregivers were recruited in Italy for this 1-year, longitudinal, multicentre prospective study, filling out a survey at five time points. We found two distinct trajectories of change in stroke survivors' psychological QOL (i.e. Memory, Communication, Emotion, and Participation). The first trajectory (86% of the survivors) included those who started with greater levels of QOL and improved slightly to markedly in all psychological domains, while the second trajectory (14% of the survivors) comprised those who started with lower overall levels of psychological QOL and experienced a worsening or no changes at all in these dimensions up to 12-month follow-up. Very few clinical and sociodemographic variables at baseline predicted class membership. Finally, caregivers of those patients who experienced no change or a worsening in psychological QOL reported greater distress and burden over time.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the need for more tailored interventions to improve patients' psychological QOL and consequently their caregivers' well-being. This requires a shift from a stroke survivor-centred approach to a stroke survivor- and caregiver-centred one.