<p>The manuscript by Stanley et al. [<span>1</span>] presents a valuable and methodologically sound contribution to pediatric cardiology by investigating the prognostic utility of a novel echocardiographic index—the Pulmonary Venous Variability Index (PVVI)—for predicting postoperative reintervention in children undergoing surgical repair for total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC). This commentary critically examines the methodological robustness, clinical implications, and potential future directions of this study, emphasizing its relevance to both clinical practice and ongoing academic inquiry.</p><p>This rigorously designed retrospective study represents a significant advancement in the non-invasive preoperative assessment of patients with TAPVC. Identifying predictors for postoperative reintervention is crucial to optimizing outcomes in this complex congenital condition.</p><p>The current work builds upon previous findings by the same group, which demonstrated that the PVVI (defined as Vmax − Vmin / Vmean) may serve as a surrogate marker for preoperative obstruction. The index correlated with elevated catheterization-derived gradients and clinical evidence of obstruction [<span>2</span>].</p><p>TAPVC is a rare but life-threatening congenital heart anomaly, with significant morbidity and mortality primarily attributable to postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction (PVO). Despite surgical correction, reintervention is required in 10%–20% of cases. The challenge of identifying high-risk patients preoperatively remains a pressing concern in pediatric cardiac care [<span>3</span>].</p><p>The authors explore whether conventional echocardiographic parameters (e.g., Vmax, Vmean) or the PVVI can effectively predict the likelihood of reintervention. This is of high clinical relevance, as enhanced risk stratification could inform perioperative planning, improve prognostic accuracy, and potentially refine surgical strategies based on preoperative imaging.</p><p>Additionally, the study emphasizes the influence of TAPVC subtype and univentricular physiology on postoperative outcomes, questioning the predictive reliability of traditional Doppler metrics (e.g., Vmax, Vmean, and qualitative assessments of obstruction).</p><p>Given the critical importance of early identification and timely intervention in TAPVC, this study provides a valuable perspective on the limitations and potential of echocardiographic evaluation, underscoring the need to further explore novel predictive tools.</p><p>Despite its retrospective nature, the study is methodologically robust. The authors utilize a comprehensive statistical approach, including univariate and multivariate Cox regression, competing risk models, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Notably, the use of competing risk analysis—accounting for death as a competing event—is particularly appropriate given the cohort's 17% mortality rate.</p><p>Sensitivity analyses were conducted to empirically establish opt
Stanley et al.[1]的手稿通过研究一种新型超声心动图指数——肺静脉变异性指数(PVVI)的预后应用,为儿科心脏病学提供了有价值和方法上的可靠贡献,该指数用于预测接受手术修复全肺静脉连接异常(TAPVC)的儿童术后再干预。这篇评论批判性地考察了该研究的方法学稳健性、临床意义和潜在的未来方向,强调了其与临床实践和正在进行的学术研究的相关性。这项设计严谨的回顾性研究在TAPVC患者的无创术前评估方面取得了重大进展。确定术后再干预的预测因素对于优化这种复杂先天性疾病的预后至关重要。目前的工作建立在同一小组先前的研究结果的基础上,该研究表明PVVI(定义为Vmax - Vmin / Vmean)可以作为术前梗阻的替代标志物。该指数与导管衍生梯度升高和梗阻的临床证据[2]相关。TAPVC是一种罕见但危及生命的先天性心脏异常,其显著的发病率和死亡率主要归因于术后肺静脉阻塞(PVO)。尽管手术矫正,10%-20%的病例需要再次干预。术前识别高危患者的挑战仍然是儿科心脏护理bbb迫切关注的问题。作者探讨了常规超声心动图参数(如Vmax、Vmean)或PVVI是否能有效预测再干预的可能性。这具有很高的临床相关性,因为增强的风险分层可以为围手术期计划提供信息,提高预后准确性,并有可能根据术前影像学改进手术策略。此外,该研究强调了TAPVC亚型和单室生理对术后预后的影响,质疑了传统多普勒指标(如Vmax、Vmean和梗阻定性评估)的预测可靠性。鉴于早期识别和及时干预TAPVC的重要性,本研究为超声心动图评估的局限性和潜力提供了有价值的视角,强调了进一步探索新型预测工具的必要性。尽管是回顾性的,但该研究在方法上是可靠的。作者利用综合统计方法,包括单变量和多变量Cox回归,竞争风险模型和Kaplan-Meier生存分析。值得注意的是,考虑到该队列17%的死亡率,使用竞争风险分析(将死亡作为竞争事件)尤其合适。通过敏感性分析,以经验建立超声心动图各变量的最佳临界值,避免了任意阈值,提高了研究的可靠性。测量的再现性也进行了严格的评估。PVVI、Vmax、Vmean和Vmin的类内相关系数(ICCs)超过0.95,证明了出色的观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性——这是验证新的超声心动图参数时的一个关键方面。这些方法学上的优势增强了该研究的临床相关性,并提示了TAPVC手术计划和风险分层的潜在适用性。该研究的关键发现是,在单因素分析中,PVVI≤0.5是唯一与再干预风险增加相关的超声心动图参数[风险比(HR) 2.16, p = 0.03]。然而,在考虑TAPVC亚型和单心室生理的多变量模型中,pvvi失去了统计学意义,而混合TAPVC (HR 3.02)和单心室解剖(HR 2.39)成为最可靠的预测因子。这对长期依赖多普勒速度作为PVO指标提出了挑战。该研究表明,解剖和生理因素,而不是术前血流速度,应该是风险评估的中心。在Vmax、Vmean和定性评估中缺乏预测价值在统计上和概念上都是合理的。新生儿的多普勒评估通常受到次优声窗的限制,可能不能反映下游解剖限制。尽管PVVI显示出希望,但它似乎受到不同TAPVC亚型固有的血流动力学因素的混淆。确定单心室生理学和混合型TAPVC为主要预测因子具有直接的临床相关性。这些患者可能受益于加强监测,术后早期成像和其他手术考虑。一个有趣的次要观察与垂直静脉管理有关。虽然没有统计学意义(HR 2.17, p = 0)。 (07),开放的垂直静脉再干预风险增加的趋势值得进一步研究,并可能支持最近文献中提出的延迟关闭策略。重要的是,选择无缝线修复与直接吻合对再干预率没有显著影响,这与荟萃分析数据一致,表明无缝线技术只有适度的、依赖于环境的益处。PVVI的创新之处在于它量化了静脉多普勒波形的相位损失,这在以前被认为是阻塞的定性标志。通过规范这一特征,本研究架起了主观解释和客观测量的桥梁。然而,有几个限制值得谨慎。回顾性、单中心设计可能会引入选择偏倚和限制推广。随访时间(中位9.4个月)可能不足以发现晚期再干预或慢性狭窄。此外,重新干预的定义和裁决的可变性可能影响结果的一致性。虽然统计模型是健全的,但中等差别(C-statistics ~ 0.70)表明预测准确性仍然是次优的,这加强了再干预风险的多因素性质。因此,我们认为下一步有必要进行多中心前瞻性研究,以评估PVVI在更大患者群体中的效用。这可能阐明术前超声心动图对TAPVC的真正预后价值。Stanley等人对TAPVC再干预的超声心动图预测指标进行了严格且具有临床意义的研究。虽然PVVI显示出潜力,但其在多变量分析中的作用有限,这表明解剖和生理复杂性仍然是最显著的危险因素。这项工作有助于对先天性心脏病术前影像学的不断发展的理解,并支持从孤立的多普勒指标向更全面、多模式风险分层方法的转变。这是对文献的一个值得赞扬的补充,并将对寻求优化儿科心脏手术结果的临床医生和研究人员感兴趣。
{"title":"Critical Appraisal of Echocardiographic Predictors for Reintervention in TAPVC Surgery","authors":"Daniel Palanca Arias","doi":"10.1111/echo.70214","DOIUrl":"10.1111/echo.70214","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The manuscript by Stanley et al. [<span>1</span>] presents a valuable and methodologically sound contribution to pediatric cardiology by investigating the prognostic utility of a novel echocardiographic index—the Pulmonary Venous Variability Index (PVVI)—for predicting postoperative reintervention in children undergoing surgical repair for total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC). This commentary critically examines the methodological robustness, clinical implications, and potential future directions of this study, emphasizing its relevance to both clinical practice and ongoing academic inquiry.</p><p>This rigorously designed retrospective study represents a significant advancement in the non-invasive preoperative assessment of patients with TAPVC. Identifying predictors for postoperative reintervention is crucial to optimizing outcomes in this complex congenital condition.</p><p>The current work builds upon previous findings by the same group, which demonstrated that the PVVI (defined as Vmax − Vmin / Vmean) may serve as a surrogate marker for preoperative obstruction. The index correlated with elevated catheterization-derived gradients and clinical evidence of obstruction [<span>2</span>].</p><p>TAPVC is a rare but life-threatening congenital heart anomaly, with significant morbidity and mortality primarily attributable to postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction (PVO). Despite surgical correction, reintervention is required in 10%–20% of cases. The challenge of identifying high-risk patients preoperatively remains a pressing concern in pediatric cardiac care [<span>3</span>].</p><p>The authors explore whether conventional echocardiographic parameters (e.g., Vmax, Vmean) or the PVVI can effectively predict the likelihood of reintervention. This is of high clinical relevance, as enhanced risk stratification could inform perioperative planning, improve prognostic accuracy, and potentially refine surgical strategies based on preoperative imaging.</p><p>Additionally, the study emphasizes the influence of TAPVC subtype and univentricular physiology on postoperative outcomes, questioning the predictive reliability of traditional Doppler metrics (e.g., Vmax, Vmean, and qualitative assessments of obstruction).</p><p>Given the critical importance of early identification and timely intervention in TAPVC, this study provides a valuable perspective on the limitations and potential of echocardiographic evaluation, underscoring the need to further explore novel predictive tools.</p><p>Despite its retrospective nature, the study is methodologically robust. The authors utilize a comprehensive statistical approach, including univariate and multivariate Cox regression, competing risk models, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Notably, the use of competing risk analysis—accounting for death as a competing event—is particularly appropriate given the cohort's 17% mortality rate.</p><p>Sensitivity analyses were conducted to empirically establish opt","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716103/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}