Current Opinion in Gastroenterology最新文献

Purpose of review: Chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) are increasingly prevalent presentations to gastroenterologists' offices, and clinicians often make a presumptive diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) based on LPS symptoms or laryngoscopic findings alone. Such presumptive diagnoses of LPRD often are incorrect, and establishing the correct diagnosis poses significant challenges for clinicians. This review addresses the timely need for advances in evaluating and managing LPS/LPRD, given their diagnostic complexity and the healthcare burden of ineffective empiric treatments.

Recent findings: Recent evidence emphasizes the diverse etiologies of LPS including LPRD, oropharyngeal or other airway pathologies, allergic conditions, and cognitive-affective processes or altered brain-larynx interaction. The diagnostic approach should be individualized and multimodal, including upfront reflux testing over empiric acid suppression trials for possible LPRD, given the poor correlation between LPS and objective evidence of reflux. Predictive models and risk stratification tools such as the COuGH RefluX score show promise to help guide testing and therapeutic strategies. Reflux testing modalities include wireless pH monitoring and impedance-based testing (traditional impedance-pH or combined hypopharyngeal-esophageal reflux monitoring). Biochemical testing for salivary pepsin may also offer adjunctive value. Management should include antireflux strategies for those with objectively-proven LPRD, alongside treatments targeting nonreflux mechanisms of LPS, such as voice therapy, neuromodulation, and behavioral therapy.

Summary: An individualized, multidisciplinary approach is essential in managing LPS/LPRD. Objective reflux testing improves diagnostic accuracy, avoids unnecessary therapies, and enables tailored treatment. Future research should further refine diagnostic thresholds, validate risk stratification tools, and explore novel therapeutic targets to optimize outcomes.

Purpose of review: Therapeutic options in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded significantly. Patients often experience primary or secondary loss of response to biologics or small molecules therapy. Determining which patients may benefit from combination of two therapies remains a key question.

Recent findings: Combination therapy leverages complementary mechanisms of action, conventionally using tumor necrosis factor antagonists simultaneously with immunosuppressive agents, and more recently using two advanced therapies together. Combination of two advanced therapies has shown promise in two recent randomized trials for improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes while maintaining acceptable safety profiles. Observational studies highlight its potential for refractory disease and complex phenotypes. Guidelines still conservatively recommend monotherapy for IBD patients, even for those at high risk for complications.

Summary: Advanced combination therapy (ACT) represents a potential significant advancement in managing IBD, offering treatment options for refractory cases, concomitant immune-mediated diseases and high-risk populations. Nonetheless, further randomized trials and registry data are needed to generate evidence to support broader adoption of this approach. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness, longer-term treatment strategies and safety to refine its application in clinical practice.

Purpose of review: Despite the efficacy of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a significant contributor to liver-related morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes the approach to HCV treatment, the simplified treatment algorithm for most patients, the management of special populations, and future directions for HCV interventions.

Recent findings: Pan genotypic DAA regimens have high cure rates and can be managed by nonspecialist providers, and the simplified treatment approach provides a clear algorithm for workup and treatment decisions among treatment-naive patients without decompensated cirrhosis. Additionally, advancements in point of care diagnostics have the potential to further expand access to screening and linkage to care. Despite these breakthroughs, barriers to accessing care and the stigmatization of high-risk populations continue to undercut progress towards HCV elimination. Continued implementation of innovative screening and treatment strategies are required to overcome rising HCV prevalence.

Summary: HCV cure is achievable for nearly all patients, but reaching HCV elimination goals will require a comprehensive approach that increases screening, expands access to simplified treatment, and avoids stigmatization of at-risk populations. Targeting healthcare disparities and removing barriers to treatment uptake are crucial to achieving elimination targets.

Purpose of review: Noncirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) comprises a diverse group of vascular liver disorders characterized by elevated portal pressure without cirrhosis. Due to overlapping clinical features, distinguishing NCPH from cirrhosis and porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) remains challenging. This review explores recent advancements in diagnosis, differentiation, and evolving treatment strategies.

Recent findings: NCPH is characterized by preserved liver function and near-normal hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPG). It shares risk factors with PSVD, including infections, drugs, toxins, and prothrombotic conditions. Diagnostic advancements, such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and splenic stiffness measurement (SSM), offer noninvasive differentiation from cirrhosis, while liver biopsy remains crucial for confirming PSVD and noncirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF). Imaging is reliable for diagnosing extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) for refractory variceal bleeding or ascites, achieving rebleeding control in 72-80% of cases. Surgical shunts and splenectomy remain essential for uncontrolled bleeding and portal biliopathy, demonstrating excellent variceal control (93-95%).

Summary: NCPH requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis. Differentiation from cirrhosis and PSVD relies on clinical, histological, and hemodynamic assessments. Management focuses on endoscopic, interventional, and surgical strategies tailored to disease severity. Future research should standardize diagnostic criteria, explore targeted therapies, and refine prognostic tools to improve outcomes.

Purpose of review: Celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic autoimmune disorder of the small intestine triggered by gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed individuals. The cornerstone of CeD management remains a strict adherence to a lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD), although such a dietary restriction can lead to an altered quality of life and may not be easy to follow for many patients. These challenges highlighted the need for alternative therapies. This review aims to explore the latest advancements in these therapeutic avenues, emphasizing mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles of drugs currently in advanced stages of clinical testing.

Recent findings: Recent advances in the understanding of CeD pathophysiology have catalyzed the development of new therapeutic approaches, which include strategies to modify gluten processing in the gut, block gluten-triggered immune responses, or restore immune tolerance to gluten.

Summary: While these therapies are not poised to take the place of GFD, they represent promising treatment alternatives that could enhance the quality of life and minimize long-term consequences in CeD patients. Further research, as well as phase III clinical trials of those already conducted, are needed to establish the feasibility of integrating these novel drugs in the clinical management of CeD.

Purpose of review: Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is a common congenital ileal diverticulum. Whilst mostly asymptomatic, 4-9% develop complications, such as small bowel obstruction, diverticulitis or bleeding. In 1933, Charles Mayo wrote that MD is 'frequently suspected, often looked for and seldom found', and it continues to pose a diagnostic challenge today. With advancements in small bowel imaging and endoscopy, this review outlines the gastroenterologist's approach to MD.

Recent findings: There are a number of strategies for diagnosing MD. Meckel's scan has a sensitivity of 80-92% in children but 62-88% in adults. The diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is only up to 50%. Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has a sensitivity of 84-100% for MD but is invasive. The definitive treatment for symptomatic MD is surgical resection, but the management of asymptomatic cases are controversial. A recent systematic review favoured resection of incidental MD.

Summary: A high index of suspicion and a multimodality combination of SBCE, Meckel's scan, CT and DAE is often required to diagnose MD. Complicated MD is treated by surgical resection. Management of incidental MD remains debated, although current evidence appears to favour resection.

Purpose of review: Portal vein thromboses (PVT) is a common clotting disorder that can be seen in patients with and without cirrhosis. There are no current clinical guidelines on management of portal vein thromboses in these two distinct populations given most studies are retrospective and comprised of heterogenous cohorts.

Recent findings: When evaluating PVT, patients must first be stratified into those with cirrhosis and those without cirrhosis. In addition, a novel nomenclature can help categorize specific PVT types and determine the need and response to anticoagulation. The management of PVT in patients with cirrhosis varies and is primarily dependent on whether the PVT is recent or chronic. In contrast, patients without cirrhosis are almost always anticoagulated to avoid complications of PVT. Direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular weight heparin, and vitamin-K antagonists have all been used in patients with and without cirrhosis, without clear guidance on optimal treatment duration and surveillance.

Summary: Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly used for patients with PVT though there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of these medications. The risk/benefit profiles of various anticoagulants must be considered when choosing a therapeutic anticoagulant. There are ongoing studies evaluating outcome measures of different anticoagulants in patients with PVT. Large, multicenter, randomized controlled trials may help elucidate the efficacy of anticoagulants on various outcome measures in PVT, including recanalization, bleeding, and survival.

Purpose of review: This review highlights the critical considerations for monitoring patients who achieve sustained virological response (SVR) after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Despite the remarkable success of DAAs, challenges persist in managing long-term risks, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver decompensation, and extrahepatic manifestations, necessitating a tailored follow-up approach.

Recent findings: Recent studies emphasize that SVR does not eliminate risks for complications, particularly in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Advances in noninvasive tools, such as transient elastography and blood-based markers, have improved assessment of portal hypertension and liver function dynamics post-SVR. HCC surveillance remains critical for high-risk groups. Additionally, SVR improves extrahepatic conditions like mixed cryoglobulinemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, though careful monitoring for recurrence or associated risks is advised. Reinfection in high-risk populations underscores the importance of structured prevention and retreatment strategies.

Summary: Tailored follow-up of post-SVR patients remains essential. Future research should focus on refining predictive tools for late complications and optimizing surveillance strategies, balancing cost-effectiveness with clinical outcomes.