首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Campus climate and intersectional inequities in eating disorders among U.S. college students: A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy 校园气候和美国大学生饮食失调的交叉不平等:个体异质性和歧视准确性的多水平分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.014
Ariel L. Beccia , Vivienne M. Hazzard , Rachel F. Rodgers , Dougie Zubizarreta , Lauren M. Schaefer , Natasha L. Burke

Purpose

To advance understanding of how contextual factors explain eating disorder (ED) inequities among college students, we examined associations between campus climate – i.e., the extent to which a given school is hostile vs. friendly to students of diverse social/cultural backgrounds – and ED prevalence across intersections of gender, sexual, and racialized identity.

Method

Cross-sectional data came from 15,544 students at colleges/universities that participated in the 2018/2019 Healthy Minds Study. We conducted a Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) by grouping participants into 35 intersectional social strata defined by gender, sexual, and racialized identity and fitting multilevel models to obtain stratum-specific prevalence estimates of probable EDs across the range of campus climate ratings (1 = “very hostile” to 5 = “very friendly”).

Results

Campus climate was inversely associated with probable EDs; specifically, for every 1-unit increase in ratings (i.e., more friendly climates), odds decreased by 8 %. There were differences in the magnitude of this association across strata, such that multiply marginalized students experienced the largest benefits from attending “very friendly” campuses, and especially those who were cisgender women and/or LGBQ+.

Conclusions

Results reveal a complex social patterning of EDs among college students across campus climate ratings and provide preliminary evidence suggesting that hostile campus climates may function as a driver of intersectional inequities in this population.
目的:为了进一步了解环境因素是如何解释大学生饮食失调(ED)不平等的,我们研究了校园气候(即一所特定学校对不同社会/文化背景的学生的敌意与友好程度)与ED在性别、性取向和种族认同交叉点的流行之间的关系。方法:横断面数据来自参加2018/2019年健康心理研究的15544名高校学生。我们进行了个体异质性和歧视性准确性的多层次分析(MAIHDA),通过将参与者分组到35个由性别、性取向和种族身份定义的交叉社会阶层,并拟合多层次模型,以获得在校园气候评级(1 =“非常敌对”到5 =“非常友好”)范围内可能的ed的分层特定患病率估计。结果:校园气候与ed的发生呈负相关;具体来说,每增加1个单位的评级(例如,更友好的气候),赔率下降8%。这种联系在不同阶层的程度上存在差异,因此,许多被边缘化的学生从“非常友好”的校园中获益最大,尤其是那些顺性女性和/或LGBQ+学生。结论:研究结果揭示了校园气候评分中大学生ed的复杂社会模式,并提供了初步证据表明,恶劣的校园气候可能是这一人群中交叉不平等的驱动因素。
{"title":"Campus climate and intersectional inequities in eating disorders among U.S. college students: A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy","authors":"Ariel L. Beccia ,&nbsp;Vivienne M. Hazzard ,&nbsp;Rachel F. Rodgers ,&nbsp;Dougie Zubizarreta ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Natasha L. Burke","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To advance understanding of how contextual factors explain eating disorder (ED) inequities among college students, we examined associations between campus climate – i.e., the extent to which a given school is hostile vs. friendly to students of diverse social/cultural backgrounds – and ED prevalence across intersections of gender, sexual, and racialized identity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Cross-sectional data came from 15,544 students at colleges/universities that participated in the 2018/2019 Healthy Minds Study. We conducted a Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) by grouping participants into 35 intersectional social strata defined by gender, sexual, and racialized identity and fitting multilevel models to obtain stratum-specific prevalence estimates of probable EDs across the range of campus climate ratings (1 = “very hostile” to 5 = “very friendly”).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Campus climate was inversely associated with probable EDs; specifically, for every 1-unit increase in ratings (i.e., more friendly climates), odds decreased by 8 %. There were differences in the magnitude of this association across strata, such that multiply marginalized students experienced the largest benefits from attending “very friendly” campuses, and especially those who were cisgender women and/or LGBQ+.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results reveal a complex social patterning of EDs among college students across campus climate ratings and provide preliminary evidence suggesting that hostile campus climates may function as a driver of intersectional inequities in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “The association of preterm birth and small for gestational age with recurrent multisite musculoskeletal pain during early and middle adulthood — The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study” [Ann Epidemiol 111 (2025) 9979] “早产和胎龄小与成年早期和中期复发性多部位肌肉骨骼疼痛的关系-芬兰北部出生队列1966年研究”的勘误表[Ann epidemiology 111 (2025) 9979]
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.023
Sandra-Sofia Nieminen , Jaro Karppinen , Eero Kajantie , Paulo Ferreira , Eveliina Heikkala
{"title":"Corrigendum to “The association of preterm birth and small for gestational age with recurrent multisite musculoskeletal pain during early and middle adulthood — The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study” [Ann Epidemiol 111 (2025) 9979]","authors":"Sandra-Sofia Nieminen ,&nbsp;Jaro Karppinen ,&nbsp;Eero Kajantie ,&nbsp;Paulo Ferreira ,&nbsp;Eveliina Heikkala","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Page 116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145227783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic conditions, disability, and COVID-19 testing and vaccination: A national Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics‐Underserved Populations analysis 慢性病、残疾和COVID-19检测和疫苗接种:全国快速加速诊断——服务不足人群分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.019
Haley R. Fonseca , Elizabeth Lydon , Troy A. Stefano , Eileen Fluney , Lisa Wruck , Susanna Stevens , Krista M. Perreira , David R. Brown , Wensong Wu , Marianna K. Baum

Purpose

We investigated the impact of chronic conditions on COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and related challenges, with a focus on the interaction effect of disability.

Methods

This cross-sectional, cross-consortium analysis was conducted as part of the National Institutes of Health Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Population (RADx-UP) initiative. Data were self-reported via standardized RADx-UP common data elements. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models with a logit link adjusted for sociodemographic variables, health insurance, health status, housing, and United States region were utilized.

Results

Participants were from 28 states (n = 8813), enrolled between February 2021-March 2022 with a mean age of 49 years, 60.4 % female, 30.8 % Hispanic, and 25.5 % Black, non-Hispanic. Over 30 % were living with three or more chronic conditions and 22.1 % reported some type of disability. Odds of COVID-19 testing (aOR:1.95; 95 %CI:1.75, 2.17), vaccination (aOR:1.63; 95 %CI:1.31, 2.03), food insecurity (aOR:1.43; 95 %CI:1.21, 1.68), housing insecurity (aOR:1.42; 95 %CI:1.10, 1.82), healthcare access challenges (aOR:1.60; 95 %CI:1.38, 1.86) and transportation challenges (aOR:1.48; 95 %CI:1.21, 1.81) increased as number of chronic conditions increased. The effect of chronic conditions on probability of COVID-19 testing (p = 0.157) and vaccination (p = 0.147) did not differ by disability, but the effect on probability of experiencing COVID-19-related challenges did differ by disability (p < 0.001). For those with functional and employment disability, the more chronic conditions one had, the more likely they were to experience food insecurity (aOR:1.94; 95 %CI:1.33, 2.82) and issues accessing healthcare (aOR:2.21; 95 %CI:1.19, 4.14) and transportation (aOR:2.33; 95 %CI:1.11, 4.89).

Conclusions

Testing and vaccination sites may have been accessible to various populations and/or adults with chronic conditions may have had heightened awareness of potential vulnerability to COVID-19, which could have led to similar testing and vaccination behaviors across different disability statuses. However, disability may still exacerbate daily-life challenges in those living with chronic conditions during public health crises.
目的:研究慢性疾病对COVID-19检测、疫苗接种和相关挑战的影响,重点研究残疾的相互作用效应。方法:作为美国国立卫生研究院快速加速诊断服务不足人群(RADx-UP)计划的一部分,进行了横断面、跨联盟分析。数据通过标准化RADx-UP通用数据元素自我报告。采用了对社会人口变量、健康保险、健康状况、住房和美国地区进行调整的带有logit链接的多变量广义估计方程模型。结果:参与者来自28个州(n=8,813),于2021年2月至2022年3月期间入组,平均年龄49岁,60.4%为女性,30.8%为西班牙裔,25.5%为非西班牙裔黑人。超过30%的人患有三种或三种以上的慢性病,22.1%的人报告了某种类型的残疾。COVID-19检测(aOR:1.95; 95%CI:1.75, 2.17)、疫苗接种(aOR:1.63; 95%CI:1.31, 2.03)、食品不安全(aOR:1.43; 95%CI:1.21, 1.68)、住房不安全(aOR:1.42; 95%CI:1.10, 1.82)、医疗保健获取挑战(aOR:1.60; 95%CI:1.38, 1.86)和交通挑战(aOR:1.48; 95%CI:1.21, 1.81)的几率随着慢性病数量的增加而增加。慢性疾病对COVID-19检测概率(p=0.157)和疫苗接种概率(p=0.147)的影响没有因残疾而异,但对经历COVID-19相关挑战概率的影响确实因残疾而异(p)。不同人群和/或患有慢性疾病的成年人可能对COVID-19的潜在易感性有更高的认识,这可能导致不同残疾状况的人进行类似的检测和接种疫苗行为。然而,在公共卫生危机期间,残疾仍可能加剧慢性病患者的日常生活挑战。
{"title":"Chronic conditions, disability, and COVID-19 testing and vaccination: A national Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics‐Underserved Populations analysis","authors":"Haley R. Fonseca ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lydon ,&nbsp;Troy A. Stefano ,&nbsp;Eileen Fluney ,&nbsp;Lisa Wruck ,&nbsp;Susanna Stevens ,&nbsp;Krista M. Perreira ,&nbsp;David R. Brown ,&nbsp;Wensong Wu ,&nbsp;Marianna K. Baum","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We investigated the impact of chronic conditions on COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and related challenges, with a focus on the interaction effect of disability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional, cross-consortium analysis was conducted as part of the National Institutes of Health Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Population (RADx-UP) initiative. Data were self-reported via standardized RADx-UP common data elements. Multivariable generalized estimating equation models with a logit link adjusted for sociodemographic variables, health insurance, health status, housing, and United States region were utilized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants were from 28 states (n = 8813), enrolled between February 2021-March 2022 with a mean age of 49 years, 60.4 % female, 30.8 % Hispanic, and 25.5 % Black, non-Hispanic. Over 30 % were living with three or more chronic conditions and 22.1 % reported some type of disability. Odds of COVID-19 testing (aOR:1.95; 95 %CI:1.75, 2.17), vaccination (aOR:1.63; 95 %CI:1.31, 2.03), food insecurity (aOR:1.43; 95 %CI:1.21, 1.68), housing insecurity (aOR:1.42; 95 %CI:1.10, 1.82), healthcare access challenges (aOR:1.60; 95 %CI:1.38, 1.86) and transportation challenges (aOR:1.48; 95 %CI:1.21, 1.81) increased as number of chronic conditions increased. The effect of chronic conditions on probability of COVID-19 testing (p = 0.157) and vaccination (p = 0.147) did not differ by disability, but the effect on probability of experiencing COVID-19-related challenges did differ by disability (p &lt; 0.001). For those with functional and employment disability, the more chronic conditions one had, the more likely they were to experience food insecurity (aOR:1.94; 95 %CI:1.33, 2.82) and issues accessing healthcare (aOR:2.21; 95 %CI:1.19, 4.14) and transportation (aOR:2.33; 95 %CI:1.11, 4.89).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Testing and vaccination sites may have been accessible to various populations and/or adults with chronic conditions may have had heightened awareness of potential vulnerability to COVID-19, which could have led to similar testing and vaccination behaviors across different disability statuses. However, disability may still exacerbate daily-life challenges in those living with chronic conditions during public health crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 107-115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145180233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung cancer mortality attributable to smoking: a multi-scenario analysis with variable lag periods 吸烟导致的肺癌死亡率:具有可变滞后期的多情景分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.011
María Isolina Santiago-Pérez , Carla Guerra-Tort , Esther López-Vizcaíno , Lucía Martín-Gisbert , Ana Teijeiro , Guadalupe García , Julia Rey-Brandariz , Alberto Ruano-Ravina , Mónica Pérez-Ríos

Purpose

The estimation of smoking-attributable mortality (SAM) is subject to the acceptance of different assumptions that may influence the estimates. We aimed to assess lung cancer mortality attributable to smoking by using both a prevalence-independent method (PIM) and a prevalence-dependent method (PDM) with different lags between exposure (smoking prevalence) and outcome (lung cancer mortality).

Methods

We estimated the population attributable fractions (PAF) and the lung cancer SAM by sex and age group (35–64, 65–84 years), year-by-year from 2011 to 2020, in four scenarios in Spain. In three of these scenarios, a PDM was applied using different lags: no lag, a 15-year lag and a 20-year lag. In the fourth scenario, a PIM was applied.

Results

In the period 2011–2020 in Spain, the SAM was higher when the 20-year lag PDM was considered (173,526 deaths) and lower when no lag PDM or a PIM was applied (161,249 and 157,390 deaths, respectively). In men, the PAFs were similar between the no lag PDM and the PIM (86.7 % and 87.3 %, respectively). However, when a PDM 15-year or 20-year lag was considered, the PAF increased to 91.0 % and 92.3 %, respectively. In women, the lowest PAF was obtained with the PIM (57.3 %), and the highest with the PDM 20-year lag (79.4 %).

Conclusions

SAM estimates differ depending on the methods and lags used. Applying a 15-year or 20-year lag PDM yields higher SAM estimates than when no lag PDM or a PIM is used. Therefore, when feasible, smoking prevalence data that incorporate a lag of 15 or 20 years between exposure and result should be used for accurate estimates.
目的:吸烟归因死亡率(SAM)的估计取决于对可能影响估计的不同假设的接受程度。我们的目的是通过使用患病率独立方法(PIM)和患病率依赖方法(PDM)来评估肺癌可归因死亡率,这两种方法在暴露(吸烟率)和结果(肺癌死亡率)之间存在不同的滞后。方法:从2011年到2020年,我们按性别和年龄组(35-64岁,65-84岁)对西班牙四种情况的人口归因分数(PAF)和肺癌SAM进行了逐年估算。在其中三种情况下,使用不同的滞后来应用PDM:无滞后、15年滞后和20年滞后。在第四个场景中,应用了PIM。结果:在2011-2020年期间,西班牙考虑20年滞后PDM时,SAM较高(173,526例死亡),而不考虑滞后PDM或PIM时,SAM较低(分别为161,249例和157,390例死亡)。在男性中,无滞后PDM和PIM之间的paf相似(分别为86.7%和87.3%)。然而,当考虑到15年或20年的PDM滞后时,PAF增加到91.0%和92.3%。在女性中,PIM组PAF最低(57.3%),PDM组PAF最高(79.4%)。结论:SAM的估计因使用的方法和滞后而不同。应用15年或20年滞后PDM比不使用滞后PDM或PIM产生更高的SAM估计。因此,在可行的情况下,应使用从接触到结果之间滞后15或20年的吸烟率数据进行准确估计。
{"title":"Lung cancer mortality attributable to smoking: a multi-scenario analysis with variable lag periods","authors":"María Isolina Santiago-Pérez ,&nbsp;Carla Guerra-Tort ,&nbsp;Esther López-Vizcaíno ,&nbsp;Lucía Martín-Gisbert ,&nbsp;Ana Teijeiro ,&nbsp;Guadalupe García ,&nbsp;Julia Rey-Brandariz ,&nbsp;Alberto Ruano-Ravina ,&nbsp;Mónica Pérez-Ríos","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The estimation of smoking-attributable mortality (SAM) is subject to the acceptance of different assumptions that may influence the estimates. We aimed to assess lung cancer mortality attributable to smoking by using both a prevalence-independent method (PIM) and a prevalence-dependent method (PDM) with different lags between exposure (smoking prevalence) and outcome (lung cancer mortality).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We estimated the population attributable fractions (PAF) and the lung cancer SAM by sex and age group (35–64, 65–84 years), year-by-year from 2011 to 2020, in four scenarios in Spain. In three of these scenarios, a PDM was applied using different lags: no lag, a 15-year lag and a 20-year lag. In the fourth scenario, a PIM was applied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the period 2011–2020 in Spain, the SAM was higher when the 20-year lag PDM was considered (173,526 deaths) and lower when no lag PDM or a PIM was applied (161,249 and 157,390 deaths, respectively). In men, the PAFs were similar between the no lag PDM and the PIM (86.7 % and 87.3 %, respectively). However, when a PDM 15-year or 20-year lag was considered, the PAF increased to 91.0 % and 92.3 %, respectively. In women, the lowest PAF was obtained with the PIM (57.3 %), and the highest with the PDM 20-year lag (79.4 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SAM estimates differ depending on the methods and lags used. Applying a 15-year or 20-year lag PDM yields higher SAM estimates than when no lag PDM or a PIM is used. Therefore, when feasible, smoking prevalence data that incorporate a lag of 15 or 20 years between exposure and result should be used for accurate estimates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 175-179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145276519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between adverse childhood experiences and obesity among young US adults 不良童年经历与美国年轻人肥胖之间的关系
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.009
Kiran Thapa PhD , Ye Shen PhD , José F. Cordero MD, MPH , Emily Anne Vall PhD , Janani Rajbhandari-Thapa PhD

Purpose

We examined whether adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with obesity in young adulthood, and whether these associations differ by sex.

Methods

We used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative cohort of U.S. adolescents followed into adulthood (age 33–43 years) across five waves. Our sample included 5193 participants with measured anthropometrics at wave V (2016–18). Modified Poisson regression estimated risk ratios (RR) for general obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²) and abdominal obesity (waist circumference >102 cm for males, >88 cm for females) associated with individual and cumulative ACEs, adjusting for baseline BMI, co-occurring ACEs, and sociodemographic covariates. Sex-stratified models assessed heterogeneity in effects.

Results

Childhood physical abuse was independently associated with higher risk of general obesity, particularly among females (aRR: 1.23; 95 % CI: 1.05–1.45). Exposure to ≥ 4 ACEs was associated with increased risk of both general (aRR: 1.32; 95 % CI: 1.15–1.52) and abdominal obesity (aRR: 1.18; 95 % CI: 1.02–1.37), independent of childhood obesity.

Conclusions

ACEs, especially physical abuse and cumulative exposure, were linked to higher risk of obesity, suggesting that traumatic events may play an important role in young adulthood obesity, especially in females.
目的:我们研究童年不良经历(ace)是否与成年早期肥胖相关,以及这些关联是否因性别而异。方法:我们使用了来自全国青少年到成人健康纵向研究的数据,这是一个全国代表性的美国青少年队列,分为五波,一直跟踪到成年(33-43岁)。我们的样本包括5193名参与者,他们在波V(2016-18)测量了人体测量学。修正泊松回归估计了与个体和累积ace相关的一般性肥胖(体重指数≥30 kg/m²)和腹部肥胖(男性腰围1010cm,女性腰围88cm)的风险比(RR),校正了基线BMI、并发ace和社会人口协变量。性别分层模型评估了效果的异质性。结果:儿童期身体虐待与一般肥胖的高风险独立相关,尤其是女性(aRR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.05-1.45)。暴露于≥4次ace与一般(aRR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.15-1.52)和腹部肥胖(aRR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.37)的风险增加相关,与儿童肥胖无关。结论:ace,特别是身体虐待和累积暴露,与青年肥胖的高风险有关,强调了创伤知情方法预防肥胖的必要性。
{"title":"Associations between adverse childhood experiences and obesity among young US adults","authors":"Kiran Thapa PhD ,&nbsp;Ye Shen PhD ,&nbsp;José F. Cordero MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Emily Anne Vall PhD ,&nbsp;Janani Rajbhandari-Thapa PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We examined whether adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with obesity in young adulthood, and whether these associations differ by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative cohort of U.S. adolescents followed into adulthood (age 33–43 years) across five waves. Our sample included 5193 participants with measured anthropometrics at wave V (2016–18). Modified Poisson regression estimated risk ratios (RR) for general obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²) and abdominal obesity (waist circumference &gt;102 cm for males, &gt;88 cm for females) associated with individual and cumulative ACEs, adjusting for baseline BMI, co-occurring ACEs, and sociodemographic covariates. Sex-stratified models assessed heterogeneity in effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Childhood physical abuse was independently associated with higher risk of general obesity, particularly among females (aRR: 1.23; 95 % CI: 1.05–1.45). Exposure to ≥ 4 ACEs was associated with increased risk of both general (aRR: 1.32; 95 % CI: 1.15–1.52) and abdominal obesity (aRR: 1.18; 95 % CI: 1.02–1.37), independent of childhood obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ACEs, especially physical abuse and cumulative exposure, were linked to higher risk of obesity, suggesting that traumatic events may play an important role in young adulthood obesity, especially in females.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methods for estimating public transit travel times to healthcare services as a measure of equitable healthcare access 估计公共交通到卫生保健服务的旅行时间的方法,以衡量公平的卫生保健机会。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.010
Noah Mancuso , Patrick S. Sullivan

Purpose

To introduce an equity-based method for assessing public transit access to health services and apply it to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) clinics in metro-Atlanta.

Methods

Census block groups (CBGs) were analyzed with PrEP clinics identified via PrEP Locator. One-way public transit times were estimated using the Google Maps Distance Matrix API. CBGs were classified as public transit deserts if transit options were unavailable or if travel time was > 30 min. T-tests compared sociodemographic characteristics of CBGs with and without public transit. Linear regression assessed the association of a 5 % increase in priority populations with transit times.

Results

Among 2466 CBGs, one-quarter lacked public transit access to PrEP and two-thirds were transit deserts. Median travel time was 32 min. CBGs with transit access had significantly higher proportions of Black, Hispanic/Latinx, young men (aged 25–34), and residents living below the poverty line (P < .001). Increases in the proportion of Hispanic/Latinx residents, young men, and residents living under the poverty line were associated with shorter transit times, with no association for Black residents.

Conclusions

Public transit access to PrEP was low in Atlanta, and overall public transit times were long. Current PrEP locations are aligned with priority populations, but additional work is needed to ensure equity is met for Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents.
目的:介绍一种基于公平的方法来评估公共交通获得卫生服务的机会,并将其应用于亚特兰大大都会的暴露前预防(PrEP)诊所。方法:通过PrEP定位器对PrEP诊所进行普查块组(CBGs)分析。使用谷歌地图距离矩阵API估计单程公共交通时间。如果没有公共交通选择,或者旅行时间在30分钟以内,cbg被归类为公共交通沙漠。t检验比较了有和没有公共交通的cbg的社会人口学特征。线性回归评估了优先人群增加5%与过境时间的关系。结果:在2466个cbg中,四分之一缺乏公共交通工具,三分之二是交通沙漠。平均出行时间为32分钟。具有公共交通可达性的CBGs中黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、年轻男性(25-34岁)和生活在贫困线以下的居民比例显著较高(p结论:亚特兰大的公共交通可达性较低,总体公共交通时间长。目前的预防工作地点与重点人群保持一致,但需要做更多的工作,以确保黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔居民得到公平对待。
{"title":"Methods for estimating public transit travel times to healthcare services as a measure of equitable healthcare access","authors":"Noah Mancuso ,&nbsp;Patrick S. Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.09.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To introduce an equity-based method for assessing public transit access to health services and apply it to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) clinics in metro-Atlanta.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Census block groups (CBGs) were analyzed with PrEP clinics identified via <em>PrEP Locator</em>. One-way public transit times were estimated using the <em>Google Maps Distance Matrix</em> API. CBGs were classified as public transit deserts if transit options were unavailable or if travel time was &gt; 30 min. T-tests compared sociodemographic characteristics of CBGs with and without public transit. Linear regression assessed the association of a 5 % increase in priority populations with transit times.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2466 CBGs, one-quarter lacked public transit access to PrEP and two-thirds were transit deserts. Median travel time was 32 min. CBGs with transit access had significantly higher proportions of Black, Hispanic/Latinx, young men (aged 25–34), and residents living below the poverty line (P &lt; .001). Increases in the proportion of Hispanic/Latinx residents, young men, and residents living under the poverty line were associated with shorter transit times, with no association for Black residents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Public transit access to PrEP was low in Atlanta, and overall public transit times were long. Current PrEP locations are aligned with priority populations, but additional work is needed to ensure equity is met for Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards modeling evolving longitudinal health trajectories with a transformer-based deep learning model 利用基于转换器的深度学习模型对不断发展的纵向健康轨迹进行建模。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.08.025
Hans Moen , Vishnu Raj , Andrius Vabalas , Markus Perola , Samuel Kaski , Andrea Ganna , Pekka Marttinen

Purpose:

Health registers provide valuable insights into individuals’ health trajectories. This study explores the use of deep learning to model and analyze these trajectories using a nationwide longitudinal dataset containing coded features such as clinical codes, procedures, and drug purchases.

Methods:

We introduce Evolve, a transformer-based deep learning model designed to provide continuous multi-label predictions over time. The model predicts disease onsets at each time step conditioned on the health history up to that time step and the time until a given 5-year forecast window. Evolve is evaluated against several baseline models for basic prediction performance. Additionally, we analyze health trajectories by tracking changes in prediction probabilities and in the latent embedding neighborhood to identify important events.

Results:

Evolve performed comparably to baseline models in disease onset prediction while offering unique trajectory modeling capabilities. The model identified early predictive events and demonstrated that changes in embedding space could indicate shifts in health trajectories. Visualization of evolving health trajectories showed how individuals may become most similar to others with similar profiles and outcomes over time.

Conclusions:

The Evolve model seems promising at enabling continuous health monitoring, early disease detection, and retrospective analysis, making it a promising tool for personalized healthcare interventions.
Code available at: https://github.com/hansmoen/evolvehealth.
目的:健康登记提供了对个人健康轨迹的宝贵见解。本研究探索了使用深度学习来建模和分析这些轨迹,使用全国纵向数据集包含编码特征,如临床代码、程序和药物购买。方法:我们引入了Evolve,这是一种基于转换器的深度学习模型,旨在随时间提供连续的多标签预测。该模型在每个时间步预测疾病发病,条件是在该时间步之前的健康史以及直到给定的5年预测窗口的时间。根据基本预测性能的几个基线模型对Evolve进行评估。此外,我们通过跟踪预测概率和潜在嵌入邻域的变化来分析健康轨迹,以识别重要事件。结果:Evolve在疾病发病预测方面的表现与基线模型相当,同时提供独特的轨迹建模能力。该模型确定了早期预测事件,并证明嵌入空间的变化可能表明健康轨迹的变化。不断演变的健康轨迹可视化显示,随着时间的推移,个体如何变得与具有相似概况和结果的其他人最相似。结论:Evolve模型似乎有望实现持续健康监测、早期疾病检测和回顾性分析,使其成为个性化医疗保健干预的有前途的工具。代码可在:https://github.com/hansmoen/evolvehealth。
{"title":"Towards modeling evolving longitudinal health trajectories with a transformer-based deep learning model","authors":"Hans Moen ,&nbsp;Vishnu Raj ,&nbsp;Andrius Vabalas ,&nbsp;Markus Perola ,&nbsp;Samuel Kaski ,&nbsp;Andrea Ganna ,&nbsp;Pekka Marttinen","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.08.025","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.08.025","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>Health registers provide valuable insights into individuals’ health trajectories. This study explores the use of deep learning to model and analyze these trajectories using a nationwide longitudinal dataset containing coded features such as clinical codes, procedures, and drug purchases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We introduce <span>Evolve</span>, a transformer-based deep learning model designed to provide continuous multi-label predictions over time. The model predicts disease onsets at each time step conditioned on the health history up to that time step and the time until a given 5-year forecast window. <span>Evolve</span> is evaluated against several baseline models for basic prediction performance. Additionally, we analyze health trajectories by tracking changes in prediction probabilities and in the latent embedding neighborhood to identify important events.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div><span>Evolve</span> performed comparably to baseline models in disease onset prediction while offering unique trajectory modeling capabilities. The model identified early predictive events and demonstrated that changes in embedding space could indicate shifts in health trajectories. Visualization of evolving health trajectories showed how individuals may become most similar to others with similar profiles and outcomes over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>The <span>Evolve</span> model seems promising at enabling continuous health monitoring, early disease detection, and retrospective analysis, making it a promising tool for personalized healthcare interventions.</div><div>Code available at: <span><span>https://github.com/hansmoen/evolvehealth</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 30-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145058755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of machine learning and deep learning approaches for prediction modeling with time-to-event outcomes in clinical epidemiology. Methods comparison and practical considerations for generalizability and interpretability 机器学习和深度学习方法在临床流行病学中具有事件时间结果的预测建模中的应用。方法概括性与可解释性的比较与实践思考。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.012
Siona Prasad, Sabina A. Murphy, David A. Morrow, Benjamin S. Scirica, Marc S. Sabatine, David D. Berg, Andrea Bellavia

Purpose

Clinical prediction models (CPM) are essential tools for diagnosis and prognosis in clinical epidemiology. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches provide flexible methods that can complement regression-based methods for CPM when complex predictors such as clinical biomarkers are of interest. However, concerns have been raised on the ability of ML and DL to address desired properties of CPMs such as parsimony, generalizability, and interpretability.

Methods

In this study, we evaluated and applied selected regression-based, ML and DL approaches for time-to-event outcomes in a clinical study integrating protein biomarkers and lipids in an existing CPM for cardiovascular risk.

Results

We observed considerable advantages from the application of gradient boosting machines (GBM: C-statistic=0.72; Brier Score=0.052), which provided the best balance between model flexibility, discrimination, calibration, and parsimony, the latter being directly related to one of the model parameters (shrinking rate). Further, GBM results can be used for individual risk prediction, providing an interpretable tool for CPM implementation.

Conclusions

We compared ML and DL methods for CPM with time-to-event outcomes and discussed practical aspects of their implementation in clinical epidemiology including generalizability and interpretability. Adequately trained ML approaches can provide advantages in prediction modeling, especially when integrating complex predictors.
目的:临床预测模型(CPM)是临床流行病学诊断和预后的重要工具。机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法提供了灵活的方法,当对临床生物标志物等复杂预测因素感兴趣时,可以补充基于回归的CPM方法。然而,人们对ML和DL处理cpm所需属性的能力提出了关注,如简约性、概括性和可解释性。方法:在本研究中,我们在一项临床研究中评估并应用了基于回归的、ML和DL方法来评估事件发生时间的结果,该研究整合了现有CPM中心血管风险的蛋白质生物标志物和脂质。结果:我们观察到梯度增强机的应用具有相当大的优势(GBM: C-statistic=0.72; Brier Score=0.052),它提供了模型灵活性、判别性、校准性和简约性之间的最佳平衡,后者与模型参数之一(收缩率)直接相关。此外,GBM结果可用于个体风险预测,为CPM的实施提供了一个可解释的工具。结论:我们比较了ML和DL方法对CPM的时间-事件结果的影响,并讨论了它们在临床流行病学中实施的实际方面,包括普遍性和可解释性。经过充分训练的机器学习方法可以在预测建模方面提供优势,特别是在集成复杂预测器时。
{"title":"Application of machine learning and deep learning approaches for prediction modeling with time-to-event outcomes in clinical epidemiology. Methods comparison and practical considerations for generalizability and interpretability","authors":"Siona Prasad,&nbsp;Sabina A. Murphy,&nbsp;David A. Morrow,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Scirica,&nbsp;Marc S. Sabatine,&nbsp;David D. Berg,&nbsp;Andrea Bellavia","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Clinical prediction models (CPM) are essential tools for diagnosis and prognosis in clinical epidemiology. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches provide flexible methods that can complement regression-based methods for CPM when complex predictors such as clinical biomarkers are of interest. However, concerns have been raised on the ability of ML and DL to address desired properties of CPMs such as parsimony, generalizability, and interpretability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we evaluated and applied selected regression-based, ML and DL approaches for time-to-event outcomes in a clinical study integrating protein biomarkers and lipids in an existing CPM for cardiovascular risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We observed considerable advantages from the application of gradient boosting machines (GBM: C-statistic=0.72; Brier Score=0.052), which provided the best balance between model flexibility, discrimination, calibration, and parsimony, the latter being directly related to one of the model parameters (shrinking rate). Further, GBM results can be used for individual risk prediction, providing an interpretable tool for CPM implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We compared ML and DL methods for CPM with time-to-event outcomes and discussed practical aspects of their implementation in clinical epidemiology including generalizability and interpretability. Adequately trained ML approaches can provide advantages in prediction modeling, especially when integrating complex predictors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 186-192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Joint spatial modelling of COVID-19 severity among seniors: A Bayesian shared component approach using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada 老年人COVID-19严重程度的联合空间建模:使用加拿大安大略省卫生行政数据的贝叶斯共享成分方法
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.004
Nushrat Nazia, Charmaine Dean

Purpose

Jointly monitoring adverse COVID-19 outcomes among seniors is critical for assessing outbreak severity. These outcomes are often influenced by socioeconomic and demographic conditions and may co-occur in space, indicating shared structural risks that inform targeted responses.

Methods

We analyzed severe COVID-19 outcomes among adults aged 65 + in Ontario (January 2020–March 2022) using data from the Ontario Health Data Platform supported by ICES. A Bayesian shared component model with Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation at the forward sortation area level included socioeconomic and demographic covariates.

Results

The shared component explained ∼75 % of the total modeled spatial variability. High risks clustered in southern Ontario, while lower risks occurred in central and northern regions. Material deprivation was positively associated with death (RR 1.12, 95 % CrI: 1.04–1.21) and multiple hospitalizations (RR 1.20, 95 % CrI: 1.13–1.29). Racialized/newcomer population concentration was positively associated with death (RR 1.25, 95 % CrI: 1.14–1.38) and with single hospitalizations (RR 1.18, 95 % CrI: 1.11–1.24). The percentage of seniors was inversely associated with hospitalization (RR 0.98, 95 % CrI: 0.96–0.99) but not death.

Conclusions

Findings highlight structural inequities in pandemic severity and suggest targeted, equity-oriented strategies in guiding pandemic preparedness and response.
目的:联合监测老年人COVID-19不良结局对评估疫情严重程度至关重要。这些结果往往受到社会经济和人口条件的影响,并可能在空间中同时发生,表明共同的结构性风险为有针对性的对策提供了信息。方法:我们使用由ICES支持的安大略省健康数据平台的数据,分析安大略省65岁以上成年人(2020年1月至2022年3月)的严重COVID-19结局。在前向分类区域水平上,采用集成嵌套拉普拉斯近似的贝叶斯共享分量模型包含社会经济和人口统计协变量。结果:共享分量解释了75%的空间变异性。高风险集中在安大略省南部,而风险较低的地区发生在中部和北部地区。物质剥夺与死亡(RR 1.12, 95% CrI: 1.04-1.21)和多次住院(RR 1.20, 95% CrI: 1.13-1.29)呈正相关。种族化/新移民人口集中与死亡呈正相关(RR 1.25, 95% CrI: 1.14-1.38),与单次住院呈正相关(RR 1.18, 95% CrI: 1.11-1.24)。老年人比例与住院率呈负相关(RR 0.98, 95% CrI: 0.96-0.99),但与死亡无关。结论:研究结果突出了大流行严重程度的结构性不平等,并建议在指导大流行防范和应对方面采取有针对性的、以公平为导向的战略。
{"title":"Joint spatial modelling of COVID-19 severity among seniors: A Bayesian shared component approach using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada","authors":"Nushrat Nazia,&nbsp;Charmaine Dean","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Jointly monitoring adverse COVID-19 outcomes among seniors is critical for assessing outbreak severity. These outcomes are often influenced by socioeconomic and demographic conditions and may co-occur in space, indicating shared structural risks that inform targeted responses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed severe COVID-19 outcomes among adults aged 65 + in Ontario (January 2020–March 2022) using data from the Ontario Health Data Platform supported by ICES. A Bayesian shared component model with Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation at the forward sortation area level included socioeconomic and demographic covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The shared component explained ∼75 % of the total modeled spatial variability. High risks clustered in southern Ontario, while lower risks occurred in central and northern regions. Material deprivation was positively associated with death (RR 1.12, 95 % CrI: 1.04–1.21) and multiple hospitalizations (RR 1.20, 95 % CrI: 1.13–1.29). Racialized/newcomer population concentration was positively associated with death (RR 1.25, 95 % CrI: 1.14–1.38) and with single hospitalizations (RR 1.18, 95 % CrI: 1.11–1.24). The percentage of seniors was inversely associated with hospitalization (RR 0.98, 95 % CrI: 0.96–0.99) but not death.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings highlight structural inequities in pandemic severity and suggest targeted, equity-oriented strategies in guiding pandemic preparedness and response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145259979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal triglyceride and HDL cholesterol, but not LDL cholesterol associated with the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: Evidence from a multi-trajectory analysis 纵向甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,而非低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与2型糖尿病发生风险相关:来自多轨迹分析的证据
IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.007
Xue Tian , Shuohua Chen , Xue Xia , Qin Xu , Shouling Wu , Anxin Wang

Purpose

There are inconsistent findings regarding the associations between lipids and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), partially due to ignoring the joint effects of longitudinal patterns in lipids simultaneously. This study aimed to investigate the association of joint multi-trajectory of different lipids with the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We enrolled 71,043 participants free of T2DM from the Kailuan study. Using group-based multi-trajectory modeling, joint multi-trajectory of triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) during 2006–2010 was developed to predict the risk of T2DM during 2010–2019.

Results

Five distinct multi-trajectory groups were identified over 4-year exposure, and 6473 (9.11 %) cases of incident T2DM occurred during a median follow-up of 8.97 years. The highest risk of T2DM was observed in Group 5 with the highest level of TG, optimal-increasing LDL, and high-increasing HDL-C (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.89–2.41), followed by Group 3 with the lowest level of HDL-C and an optimal TG and LDL-C (HR, 1.39; 95 % CI, 1.11–1.43), and Group 4 with the highest level of LDL-C, optimal-increasing TG and high-increasing HDL-C (HR, 1,26; 95 % CI, 1.11–1.43), compared to Group 2 with the lowest level of TG and optimal-increasing LDL-C and high-increasing HDL-C. The observed associations existed regardless of baseline lipid levels.

Conclusion

Our results showed the important role of high-increasing TG and low-decreasing HDL-C, rather than high-increasing LDL-C in the development of T2DM, which would help better understand the heterogeneous risk of T2DM and facilitate targeted prevention programs.
目的:关于脂质与2型糖尿病(T2DM)之间的关系,目前的研究结果并不一致,部分原因是忽略了脂质纵向模式的联合作用。本研究旨在探讨不同脂质联合多轨迹与2型糖尿病风险的关系。方法:我们从开滦研究中招募了71,043名无T2DM的参与者。采用基于组的多轨迹模型,建立了2006-2010年期间甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)的联合多轨迹,以预测2010-2019年期间T2DM的风险。结果在4年的暴露中,确定了5个不同的多轨迹组,在中位随访8.97年期间发生了6473例(9.11 %)T2DM事件。T2DM发生风险最高的是TG、LDL、HDL-C水平最高的第5组(风险比[HR], 2.14; 95 %可信区间[CI], 1.89 ~ 2.41),其次是HDL-C水平最低、TG、LDL- c水平最佳的第3组(风险比,1.39;95 % CI, 1.11 ~ 1.43), LDL- c水平最高、TG、HDL-C水平最佳的第4组(风险比,1,26;95 % CI, 1.11-1.43),与TG水平最低、LDL-C最佳升高和HDL-C高升高的2组相比。无论基线脂质水平如何,观察到的关联都存在。结论高升高的TG和低降低的HDL-C在T2DM的发生过程中发挥重要作用,而不是高升高的LDL-C,这有助于更好地了解T2DM的异质性风险,促进有针对性的预防计划。
{"title":"Longitudinal triglyceride and HDL cholesterol, but not LDL cholesterol associated with the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: Evidence from a multi-trajectory analysis","authors":"Xue Tian ,&nbsp;Shuohua Chen ,&nbsp;Xue Xia ,&nbsp;Qin Xu ,&nbsp;Shouling Wu ,&nbsp;Anxin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.10.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>There are inconsistent findings regarding the associations between lipids and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), partially due to ignoring the joint effects of longitudinal patterns in lipids simultaneously. This study aimed to investigate the association of joint multi-trajectory of different lipids with the risk of type 2 diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 71,043 participants free of T2DM from the Kailuan study. Using group-based multi-trajectory modeling, joint multi-trajectory of triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) during 2006–2010 was developed to predict the risk of T2DM during 2010–2019.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five distinct multi-trajectory groups were identified over 4-year exposure, and 6473 (9.11 %) cases of incident T2DM occurred during a median follow-up of 8.97 years. The highest risk of T2DM was observed in Group 5 with the highest level of TG, optimal-increasing LDL, and high-increasing HDL-C (hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.89–2.41), followed by Group 3 with the lowest level of HDL-C and an optimal TG and LDL-C (HR, 1.39; 95 % CI, 1.11–1.43), and Group 4 with the highest level of LDL-C, optimal-increasing TG and high-increasing HDL-C (HR, 1,26; 95 % CI, 1.11–1.43), compared to Group 2 with the lowest level of TG and optimal-increasing LDL-C and high-increasing HDL-C. The observed associations existed regardless of baseline lipid levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results showed the important role of high-increasing TG and low-decreasing HDL-C, rather than high-increasing LDL-C in the development of T2DM, which would help better understand the heterogeneous risk of T2DM and facilitate targeted prevention programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 138-145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145269393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1