Amphibians are among the most endangered taxa worldwide, but little is known about how their disappearance can alter the functioning and structure of freshwater ecosystems, where they live as larval stages. This is particularly true for urodeles, which often are key predators in these ecosystems. The fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) is a common predator in European fresh waters, but the species is declining due to habitat loss and the infection by fungal pathogens. We studied the consequences of fire salamander loss from three montane streams, by comparing two key ecosystem processes (periphyton accrual and leaf litter decomposition) and the structure of three communities (periphytic algae, aquatic hyphomycetes and invertebrates) using stream enclosures with and without salamander larvae. Salamander loss did not cause changes in invertebrate abundance or community structure, except for one stream where abundance increased in the absence of salamander larvae. However, salamander loss led to lower periphyton accrual, changes in algal community structure and slower leaf litter decomposition, with no associated changes in fungal communities or microbial decomposition. The changes observed may have been caused by release of salamander predatory pressure on invertebrates, which could have promoted their grazing on periphyton, in contrast to their preference for leaf shredding in the presence of salamander. Our study demonstrates an important role of salamander larvae in montane streams through top-down control of lower trophic levels and thus in regulating key stream ecosystem processes. Our results highlight the need for improving protection measures for amphibians to prevent these alterations on ecosystem structure and function.
{"title":"Salamander loss alters montane stream ecosystem functioning and structure through top-down effects","authors":"A. Alonso, J. Bosch, J. Pérez, D. Rojo, L. Boyero","doi":"10.1111/acv.12958","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12958","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Amphibians are among the most endangered taxa worldwide, but little is known about how their disappearance can alter the functioning and structure of freshwater ecosystems, where they live as larval stages. This is particularly true for urodeles, which often are key predators in these ecosystems. The fire salamander (<i>Salamandra salamandra</i>) is a common predator in European fresh waters, but the species is declining due to habitat loss and the infection by fungal pathogens. We studied the consequences of fire salamander loss from three montane streams, by comparing two key ecosystem processes (periphyton accrual and leaf litter decomposition) and the structure of three communities (periphytic algae, aquatic hyphomycetes and invertebrates) using stream enclosures with and without salamander larvae. Salamander loss did not cause changes in invertebrate abundance or community structure, except for one stream where abundance increased in the absence of salamander larvae. However, salamander loss led to lower periphyton accrual, changes in algal community structure and slower leaf litter decomposition, with no associated changes in fungal communities or microbial decomposition. The changes observed may have been caused by release of salamander predatory pressure on invertebrates, which could have promoted their grazing on periphyton, in contrast to their preference for leaf shredding in the presence of salamander. Our study demonstrates an important role of salamander larvae in montane streams through top-down control of lower trophic levels and thus in regulating key stream ecosystem processes. Our results highlight the need for improving protection measures for amphibians to prevent these alterations on ecosystem structure and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 5","pages":"722-735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12958","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141354605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C. Agger, M. R. Massam, D. Assou, K. Boafo, L. Nelson, C. J. Orsman, J. T. Roberts, G. H. Segniagbeto, R. Q. Skeen, C. Beale, J. W. Mallord, D. P. Edwards
Half of all migratory bird species have declined over the past 30 years, with intercontinental migrants declining faster than their short-distance migratory counterparts. One potential cause of these declines is habitat loss and degradation on tropical wintering grounds, where agricultural conversion of natural habitats and intensification of traditional, low-intensity agricultural systems are frequently occurring. Although the broad patterns of wintering migrant abundance are well understood along most flyways, how species' habitat associations vary across disturbance gradients in agricultural landscapes remains a key question, with implications for landscape-level farm management and restoration activities. We used 328 point count locations and associated habitat assessments targeted at a cohort of eight severely declining Afro-Palaearctic migratory passerines in the Guineo–Congolian transition zone of Western Africa to model the probability of the presence of migrants within grass, shrub, forb and forest-covered areas. We found support for the widespread use of early successional habitats retained within traditionally managed farmland by migrants. Most species utilize scrubland on fallows within the agricultural mosaic, especially Spotted Flycatcher, Garden Warbler, Melodious Warbler, Whinchat and Common Nightingale. Only Pied Flycatcher relied upon mature forested areas. The avoidance of mature forested habitats by most species suggests that habitat requirements of severely declining migrant birds must be explicitly considered within conservation and restoration schemes, via mechanisms to retain low-intensity farming, especially short-term abandoned fallows that regenerate scrubby areas within the agricultural matrix. Any habitat management within the agricultural matrix should be considered in the context of the needs of local communities.
{"title":"Conserving low-intensity farming is key to halting the declines of migratory passerines in their tropical wintering grounds","authors":"C. Agger, M. R. Massam, D. Assou, K. Boafo, L. Nelson, C. J. Orsman, J. T. Roberts, G. H. Segniagbeto, R. Q. Skeen, C. Beale, J. W. Mallord, D. P. Edwards","doi":"10.1111/acv.12957","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12957","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Half of all migratory bird species have declined over the past 30 years, with intercontinental migrants declining faster than their short-distance migratory counterparts. One potential cause of these declines is habitat loss and degradation on tropical wintering grounds, where agricultural conversion of natural habitats and intensification of traditional, low-intensity agricultural systems are frequently occurring. Although the broad patterns of wintering migrant abundance are well understood along most flyways, how species' habitat associations vary across disturbance gradients in agricultural landscapes remains a key question, with implications for landscape-level farm management and restoration activities. We used 328 point count locations and associated habitat assessments targeted at a cohort of eight severely declining Afro-Palaearctic migratory passerines in the Guineo–Congolian transition zone of Western Africa to model the probability of the presence of migrants within grass, shrub, forb and forest-covered areas. We found support for the widespread use of early successional habitats retained within traditionally managed farmland by migrants. Most species utilize scrubland on fallows within the agricultural mosaic, especially Spotted Flycatcher, Garden Warbler, Melodious Warbler, Whinchat and Common Nightingale. Only Pied Flycatcher relied upon mature forested areas. The avoidance of mature forested habitats by most species suggests that habitat requirements of severely declining migrant birds must be explicitly considered within conservation and restoration schemes, via mechanisms to retain low-intensity farming, especially short-term abandoned fallows that regenerate scrubby areas within the agricultural matrix. Any habitat management within the agricultural matrix should be considered in the context of the needs of local communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 5","pages":"710-721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12957","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141256890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Brouwer, E.H.J. de Vries, H. Sierdsema, H.P. van der Jeugd
Urbanization forms one of the most drastic alterations of the environment and poses a major threat to wildlife. The human–induced modifications of the landscape may affect individual's fitness resulting in population declines. Research on how urbanization affects fitness traits has shown mixed results. However, studies typically contrasted data from a single species from few urban and non-urban sites collected over short timeframes. Examining multiple species across a broad urbanization gradient enables a more robust comparison and understanding of how different species are impacted by urbanization-knowledge crucial for generating population predictions, which are essential for conservation management. Here, we use data from a nation-wide citizen science project to examine variation in survival and relative body mass and size (wing length) of common passerine birds, collected along an urbanization gradient in the Netherlands over an 8-year period. Urbanization was measured as the distance from the city's border and the proportion of impervious surface area. Although the overall association between urbanization and survival was slightly negative, there was support for lower survival closer to the city in three species (chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita, European robin Erithacus rubecula, European greenfinch Chloris chloris) and higher survival closer to the city in two (great tit Parus major and house sparrow Passer domesticus) of the 11 species examined. The contrasting survival successes among species suggest that ongoing urbanization may lead to shifts in community structure and loss of biodiversity. Impacts of urbanization on relative mass and size also exhibited varying effects, albeit less pronounced, and these effects were not correlated with the effects on survival. This implies that body mass and size cannot be used as indicators for urban-associated patterns of survival. Our results further imply that effective conservation management targeting bird communities should involve a range of diverse actions, as focusing on single measures is unlikely to simultaneously impact multiple species due to the variation in responses to urbanization.
{"title":"A country-wide examination of effects of urbanization on common birds","authors":"L. Brouwer, E.H.J. de Vries, H. Sierdsema, H.P. van der Jeugd","doi":"10.1111/acv.12950","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12950","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urbanization forms one of the most drastic alterations of the environment and poses a major threat to wildlife. The human–induced modifications of the landscape may affect individual's fitness resulting in population declines. Research on how urbanization affects fitness traits has shown mixed results. However, studies typically contrasted data from a single species from few urban and non-urban sites collected over short timeframes. Examining multiple species across a broad urbanization gradient enables a more robust comparison and understanding of how different species are impacted by urbanization-knowledge crucial for generating population predictions, which are essential for conservation management. Here, we use data from a nation-wide citizen science project to examine variation in survival and relative body mass and size (wing length) of common passerine birds, collected along an urbanization gradient in the Netherlands over an 8-year period. Urbanization was measured as the distance from the city's border and the proportion of impervious surface area. Although the overall association between urbanization and survival was slightly negative, there was support for lower survival closer to the city in three species (chiffchaff <i>Phylloscopus collybita</i>, European robin <i>Erithacus rubecula</i>, European greenfinch <i>Chloris chloris</i>) and higher survival closer to the city in two (great tit <i>Parus major</i> and house sparrow <i>Passer domesticus</i>) of the 11 species examined. The contrasting survival successes among species suggest that ongoing urbanization may lead to shifts in community structure and loss of biodiversity. Impacts of urbanization on relative mass and size also exhibited varying effects, albeit less pronounced, and these effects were not correlated with the effects on survival. This implies that body mass and size cannot be used as indicators for urban-associated patterns of survival. Our results further imply that effective conservation management targeting bird communities should involve a range of diverse actions, as focusing on single measures is unlikely to simultaneously impact multiple species due to the variation in responses to urbanization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 5","pages":"698-709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12950","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141167588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D. P. Armstrong, Z. L. Stone, E. H. Parlato, G. Ngametua, E. King, S. Gibson, S. Zieltjes, K. A. Parker
Attempts to reintroduce species to managed areas may be compromised by dispersal into the surrounding landscape. Therefore, decisions regarding the selection and ongoing management of reintroduction areas require predicting dispersal as well as the survival and reproduction rates of the species to be reintroduced. Dispersal can potentially be measured directly by tracking animals, but this is often impractical. However, dispersal can also be inferred from re‐sighting surveys done within reintroduction areas if such data are available from multiple areas with varying connectivity to the surrounding landscape, allowing apparent survival and recruitment to be modelled as a function of connectivity metrics. Here, we show how data from 10 previous reintroductions of a New Zealand passerine, the toutouwai (Petroica longipes), were used to predict population dynamics at a predator‐controlled reintroduction area with high connectivity, and predictions then updated using post‐release data. Bayesian hierarchical modelling of the previous data produced prior distributions for productivity, adult survival and apparent juvenile survival rates that accounted for random variation among areas as well as rat density and connectivity. The modelling of apparent juvenile survival as a function of connectivity allowed it to be partitioned into estimates of survival and fidelity. Bayesian updating based on post‐release data produced posterior distributions for parameters that were consistent with the priors but much more precise. The prior data also allowed the recruitment rate estimated in the new area to be partitioned into separate estimates for productivity, juvenile survival and juvenile fidelity. Consequently, it was possible to not only estimate population growth under current management, but also predict the consequences of reducing the scale or intensity of predator control, facilitating adaptive management. The updated model could then be used to predict population growth as a function of the connectivity and predator control regime at proposed reintroduction areas while accounting for random variation among areas.
{"title":"Combining prior and post‐release data while accounting for dispersal to improve predictions for reintroduction populations","authors":"D. P. Armstrong, Z. L. Stone, E. H. Parlato, G. Ngametua, E. King, S. Gibson, S. Zieltjes, K. A. Parker","doi":"10.1111/acv.12949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12949","url":null,"abstract":"Attempts to reintroduce species to managed areas may be compromised by dispersal into the surrounding landscape. Therefore, decisions regarding the selection and ongoing management of reintroduction areas require predicting dispersal as well as the survival and reproduction rates of the species to be reintroduced. Dispersal can potentially be measured directly by tracking animals, but this is often impractical. However, dispersal can also be inferred from re‐sighting surveys done within reintroduction areas if such data are available from multiple areas with varying connectivity to the surrounding landscape, allowing apparent survival and recruitment to be modelled as a function of connectivity metrics. Here, we show how data from 10 previous reintroductions of a New Zealand passerine, the toutouwai (<jats:italic>Petroica longipes</jats:italic>), were used to predict population dynamics at a predator‐controlled reintroduction area with high connectivity, and predictions then updated using post‐release data. Bayesian hierarchical modelling of the previous data produced prior distributions for productivity, adult survival and apparent juvenile survival rates that accounted for random variation among areas as well as rat density and connectivity. The modelling of apparent juvenile survival as a function of connectivity allowed it to be partitioned into estimates of survival and fidelity. Bayesian updating based on post‐release data produced posterior distributions for parameters that were consistent with the priors but much more precise. The prior data also allowed the recruitment rate estimated in the new area to be partitioned into separate estimates for productivity, juvenile survival and juvenile fidelity. Consequently, it was possible to not only estimate population growth under current management, but also predict the consequences of reducing the scale or intensity of predator control, facilitating adaptive management. The updated model could then be used to predict population growth as a function of the connectivity and predator control regime at proposed reintroduction areas while accounting for random variation among areas.","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141148874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. P. Keating, E. A. Saldo, J. L. Frair, S. A. Cunningham, R. Mateo, D. S. Jachowski
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are an effective tool used to suppress rodent populations in urban and agricultural settings to reduce human disease risk and economic loss, but widespread use has resulted in adverse effects on predators globally. Attention has largely been focused on impacts of ARs on raptors, although there is increasing evidence that mammalian carnivores are also impacted. We conducted a literature review to assess the extent to which ARs have been documented in wild mammalian carnivores globally and identify potential overlap with imperiled carnivores. We found a small but growing body of literature documenting exposure to ARs in 8 Carnivora families, with Mustelidae (64% of studies), Canidae (44%) and Felidae (23%) most represented. At least 11 different AR compounds were documented in carnivores, and authors claimed that exposure caused mortality of at least one individual in 33.9% of species studied. ARs were listed as a threat for 2% of Red List carnivores, although we found that 19% of Red List carnivores had ranges that overlap countries that have documented AR exposure in carnivores. Collectively, our review highlights the need to prioritize conservation attention on the potential role of ARs on global carnivore declines. We suggest (1) expanding AR monitoring and research outside of the northern hemisphere, (2) supporting long-term AR monitoring to understand the spatial and temporal variation of AR use and exposure risk, (3) expanding research across trophic levels and across the urban–wildland gradient and 4) research to further our understanding of the point at which morbidity and mortality occur.
抗凝血灭鼠剂(ARs)是一种有效的工具,用于抑制城市和农业环境中的啮齿动物种群,以减少人类疾病风险和经济损失,但在全球范围内的广泛使用导致了对捕食者的不利影响。尽管越来越多的证据表明哺乳类食肉动物也受到了影响,但人们的注意力主要集中在ARs对猛禽的影响上。我们进行了一次文献综述,以评估全球野生哺乳类食肉动物体内ARs的记录程度,并确定与濒危食肉动物的潜在重叠。我们发现,有少量文献记录了8个食肉目动物科暴露于ARs的情况,其中以鼬科(64%的研究)、犬科(44%)和猫科(23%)最多。至少有 11 种不同的 AR 化合物被记录在食肉动物体内,作者声称,在所研究的物种中,33.9% 的物种因接触 AR 而导致至少一个个体死亡。2%的红色名录食肉动物将AR列为一种威胁,尽管我们发现19%的红色名录食肉动物的活动范围与记录了食肉动物接触AR的国家重叠。总之,我们的综述强调,有必要优先关注AR对全球食肉动物数量下降的潜在作用。我们建议:(1)扩大北半球以外的AR监测和研究;(2)支持长期AR监测,以了解AR使用和暴露风险的时空变化;(3)扩大跨营养级和跨城市-荒地梯度的研究;(4)开展研究,以进一步了解发病和死亡发生的时间点。
{"title":"Global review of anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in wild mammalian carnivores","authors":"M. P. Keating, E. A. Saldo, J. L. Frair, S. A. Cunningham, R. Mateo, D. S. Jachowski","doi":"10.1111/acv.12947","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12947","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are an effective tool used to suppress rodent populations in urban and agricultural settings to reduce human disease risk and economic loss, but widespread use has resulted in adverse effects on predators globally. Attention has largely been focused on impacts of ARs on raptors, although there is increasing evidence that mammalian carnivores are also impacted. We conducted a literature review to assess the extent to which ARs have been documented in wild mammalian carnivores globally and identify potential overlap with imperiled carnivores. We found a small but growing body of literature documenting exposure to ARs in 8 Carnivora families, with Mustelidae (64% of studies), Canidae (44%) and Felidae (23%) most represented. At least 11 different AR compounds were documented in carnivores, and authors claimed that exposure caused mortality of at least one individual in 33.9% of species studied. ARs were listed as a threat for 2% of Red List carnivores, although we found that 19% of Red List carnivores had ranges that overlap countries that have documented AR exposure in carnivores. Collectively, our review highlights the need to prioritize conservation attention on the potential role of ARs on global carnivore declines. We suggest (1) expanding AR monitoring and research outside of the northern hemisphere, (2) supporting long-term AR monitoring to understand the spatial and temporal variation of AR use and exposure risk, (3) expanding research across trophic levels and across the urban–wildland gradient and 4) research to further our understanding of the point at which morbidity and mortality occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 5","pages":"585-599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12947","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140973183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. J. Loope, R. A. Cozad, D. B. Breakfield, M. J. Aresco, E. A. Hunter
Mitigation translocations move wildlife from specific areas due to conflict with humans over land use at the site. A critical decision when carrying out mitigation translocation is the acceptable distance across which animals can be moved. This decision trades off logistical expediency of unrestricted translocation with the risk of reducing translocation success due to environmental mismatch between origin and translocation site conditions. In this study, we used a large dataset of 502 individually identifiable carcasses to examine the role of geographic origin and translocation distance in the relative survival of 2822 translocated subadult and adult gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), a species experiencing large-scale mitigation translocation, at a recipient site in the Florida panhandle, USA. We hypothesized that if climate or habitat differences between the origin and translocation site influenced survival, tortoises translocated from within the Florida panhandle would have the highest survival. To the contrary, we found that survival slightly increased with increasing climatic difference between origin and recipient site, driven by higher survival of tortoises coming from central Florida sites compared to those from the panhandle and north Florida. This suggests that environmental mismatch due to long-distance translocation is not a main driver of mortality. These models also indicated an effect of season, with a survival advantage to tortoises translocated in the spring and late fall, relative to summer translocations, and a negative effect of initial density on survival. Finally, we also estimated the upper bound on annual survival in three well-monitored groups to be quite low (92–95%) for several years following release, suggesting caution when considering large translocated populations to be viable without first assessing adult survival. Our unexpected results highlight the importance of investigating species-specific sensitivities to translocation distances and indicate the limitations of assumed linear effects of translocation distance on outcomes.
{"title":"Unexpected effect of geographic origin on post-translocation survival in a long-lived reptile, the gopher tortoise","authors":"K. J. Loope, R. A. Cozad, D. B. Breakfield, M. J. Aresco, E. A. Hunter","doi":"10.1111/acv.12946","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12946","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mitigation translocations move wildlife from specific areas due to conflict with humans over land use at the site. A critical decision when carrying out mitigation translocation is the acceptable distance across which animals can be moved. This decision trades off logistical expediency of unrestricted translocation with the risk of reducing translocation success due to environmental mismatch between origin and translocation site conditions. In this study, we used a large dataset of 502 individually identifiable carcasses to examine the role of geographic origin and translocation distance in the relative survival of 2822 translocated subadult and adult gopher tortoises (<i>Gopherus polyphemus</i>), a species experiencing large-scale mitigation translocation, at a recipient site in the Florida panhandle, USA. We hypothesized that if climate or habitat differences between the origin and translocation site influenced survival, tortoises translocated from within the Florida panhandle would have the highest survival. To the contrary, we found that survival slightly increased with increasing climatic difference between origin and recipient site, driven by higher survival of tortoises coming from central Florida sites compared to those from the panhandle and north Florida. This suggests that environmental mismatch due to long-distance translocation is not a main driver of mortality. These models also indicated an effect of season, with a survival advantage to tortoises translocated in the spring and late fall, relative to summer translocations, and a negative effect of initial density on survival. Finally, we also estimated the upper bound on annual survival in three well-monitored groups to be quite low (92–95%) for several years following release, suggesting caution when considering large translocated populations to be viable without first assessing adult survival. Our unexpected results highlight the importance of investigating species-specific sensitivities to translocation distances and indicate the limitations of assumed linear effects of translocation distance on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 5","pages":"685-697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12946","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140925706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J‐P. Emery, M. Hollanders, L. Valentine, B. Tiernan, K. Retallick, H. Cogger, J. C. Z. Woinarski, N. J. Mitchell
Conservation reintroductions play a vital role in the recovery of threatened species, and clear goals and objectives are essential for evaluating their effectiveness. In this study, we assessed short‐term success (<18 months) of trial reintroductions of the Extinct in the Wild blue‐tailed skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and Lister's gecko (Lepidodactylus listeri) on Christmas Island. Our evaluation criteria focused on body condition, reproduction, habitat suitability, survival and population growth. In 2018 and 2019, 170 C. egeriae and 160 L. listeri were translocated from a local captive breeding facility to a 2600 m2 outdoor fenced enclosure designed to exclude a predatory snake. Despite body condition declining immediately following release for both species, it had improved by 6 months post‐release. We also detected successful reproduction in both species. Apparent survival was high for C. egeriae but low for L. listeri, and population growth was only evident in C. egeriae. We were unable to determine whether low survival of L. listeri in the release site was due to high post‐release dispersal (beyond the exclosure) or mortality. Both species selected habitats that contained high rock and log cover and avoided areas with low ground cover. Appropriate assessment criteria, as utilized in this study, enable objective and timely evaluations of reintroduction success, thereby facilitating the improvement and refinement of reintroduction protocols. Our study showed that C. egeriae can establish (in the short‐ to medium‐term) in a site from which a principal threat has been excluded and undergo rapid population growth, whereas under current conditions L. listeri cannot. However, we also demonstrate that such medium‐term success may not lead to long‐term success, as the rapid increase in C. egeriae population was reversed between 29 and 31 months after release because the barrier used to exclude an invasive predator, the wolf snake (Lycodon capucinus), was breached.
{"title":"Evaluation of trial reintroductions of two extinct in the wild reptile species on Christmas Island","authors":"J‐P. Emery, M. Hollanders, L. Valentine, B. Tiernan, K. Retallick, H. Cogger, J. C. Z. Woinarski, N. J. Mitchell","doi":"10.1111/acv.12940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12940","url":null,"abstract":"Conservation reintroductions play a vital role in the recovery of threatened species, and clear goals and objectives are essential for evaluating their effectiveness. In this study, we assessed short‐term success (<18 months) of trial reintroductions of the Extinct in the Wild blue‐tailed skink (<jats:italic>Cryptoblepharus egeriae</jats:italic>) and Lister's gecko (<jats:italic>Lepidodactylus listeri</jats:italic>) on Christmas Island. Our evaluation criteria focused on body condition, reproduction, habitat suitability, survival and population growth. In 2018 and 2019, 170 <jats:italic>C. egeriae</jats:italic> and 160 <jats:italic>L. listeri</jats:italic> were translocated from a local captive breeding facility to a 2600 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> outdoor fenced enclosure designed to exclude a predatory snake. Despite body condition declining immediately following release for both species, it had improved by 6 months post‐release. We also detected successful reproduction in both species. Apparent survival was high for <jats:italic>C. egeriae</jats:italic> but low for <jats:italic>L. listeri</jats:italic>, and population growth was only evident in <jats:italic>C. egeriae</jats:italic>. We were unable to determine whether low survival of <jats:italic>L. listeri</jats:italic> in the release site was due to high post‐release dispersal (beyond the exclosure) or mortality. Both species selected habitats that contained high rock and log cover and avoided areas with low ground cover. Appropriate assessment criteria, as utilized in this study, enable objective and timely evaluations of reintroduction success, thereby facilitating the improvement and refinement of reintroduction protocols. Our study showed that <jats:italic>C. egeriae</jats:italic> can establish (in the short‐ to medium‐term) in a site from which a principal threat has been excluded and undergo rapid population growth, whereas under current conditions <jats:italic>L. listeri</jats:italic> cannot. However, we also demonstrate that such medium‐term success may not lead to long‐term success, as the rapid increase in <jats:italic>C. egeriae</jats:italic> population was reversed between 29 and 31 months after release because the barrier used to exclude an invasive predator, the wolf snake (<jats:italic>Lycodon capucinus</jats:italic>), was breached.","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140925404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E. A. McLennan, Y. Cheng, K. A. Farquharson, C. E. Grueber, J. Elmer, L. Alexander, S. Fox, K. Belov, C. J. Hogg
Reinforcements are a well‐established tool for alleviating small population pressures of inbreeding and genetic diversity loss. Some small populations also suffer from specific threats that pose a discrete selective pressure, like diseases. Uncertainty about reinforcing diseased populations exists, as doing so may increase disease prevalence and disrupt potential adaptive processes. However, without assisted gene flow, isolated populations are at high risk of extinction. Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) are a useful case study to test whether reinforcements can alleviate small‐population pressures where there is an ongoing disease pressure. We investigated demographic, genome‐wide and functional genetic diversity, and disease consequences of reinforcing a small population (<20 animals) that was severely impacted by devil facial tumour disease. Released animals from one source population successfully bred with incumbent individuals, tripling the population size, improving genome‐wide and functional diversity and introducing 26 new putatively functional alleles, with no common alleles lost and no increase in disease prevalence. Results suggest, in the case of Tasmanian devils, reinforcements can alleviate small‐population pressures without increasing disease prevalence. Because no common functional alleles were lost, it is likely that any adaptive processes in response to the disease may still occur in the reinforced population, perhaps even with greater efficiency due to reduced genetic drift (due to larger population size). Our study is presented as a comprehensive worked example of the IUCN's guidelines for monitoring reinforcements, to showcase the value of genetic monitoring in a richly monitored system and provide realistic approaches to test similar questions in other taxa.
{"title":"Reinforcements in the face of ongoing threats: a case study from a critically small carnivore population","authors":"E. A. McLennan, Y. Cheng, K. A. Farquharson, C. E. Grueber, J. Elmer, L. Alexander, S. Fox, K. Belov, C. J. Hogg","doi":"10.1111/acv.12945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12945","url":null,"abstract":"Reinforcements are a well‐established tool for alleviating small population pressures of inbreeding and genetic diversity loss. Some small populations also suffer from specific threats that pose a discrete selective pressure, like diseases. Uncertainty about reinforcing diseased populations exists, as doing so may increase disease prevalence and disrupt potential adaptive processes. However, without assisted gene flow, isolated populations are at high risk of extinction. Tasmanian devils (<jats:italic>Sarcophilus harrisii</jats:italic>) are a useful case study to test whether reinforcements can alleviate small‐population pressures where there is an ongoing disease pressure. We investigated demographic, genome‐wide and functional genetic diversity, and disease consequences of reinforcing a small population (<20 animals) that was severely impacted by devil facial tumour disease. Released animals from one source population successfully bred with incumbent individuals, tripling the population size, improving genome‐wide and functional diversity and introducing 26 new putatively functional alleles, with no common alleles lost and no increase in disease prevalence. Results suggest, in the case of Tasmanian devils, reinforcements can alleviate small‐population pressures without increasing disease prevalence. Because no common functional alleles were lost, it is likely that any adaptive processes in response to the disease may still occur in the reinforced population, perhaps even with greater efficiency due to reduced genetic drift (due to larger population size). Our study is presented as a comprehensive worked example of the IUCN's guidelines for monitoring reinforcements, to showcase the value of genetic monitoring in a richly monitored system and provide realistic approaches to test similar questions in other taxa.","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140942390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Iain J. Gordon, Rahel Sollmann, Elina M. Rantanen, Jeff A. Johnson, Karl L. Evans, Vincenzo Penteriani, Philipp Boersch-Supan
<p>The biodiversity crisis continues apace, with daily calls for more action to save species and populations in peril from direct and indirect human activities and other pressures. The expanding human footprint is also causing alterations in animal behaviour, as species attempt to survive displacement in increasingly fragmented and modified habitats (Lehman <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). On 16 January 2014, <i>Animal Conservation</i> established a new initiative asking conservation practitioners and policymakers to tell us what information they need from scientists to help them make a difference in the real world. The <i>Letter from the Conservation Front Line</i> was born (Gordon <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; herein also referred to as the <i>Letters</i>).</p><p>The challenges facing biodiversity raised in the 2014 editorial are as relevant today as they were 10 years ago. Biodiversity loss continues apace, and yet, funding for conservation is still a pittance relative to what is required, climate change (not mentioned in the original editorial) is the existential threat of our time, and pressures for urban/infrastructure/agricultural development can have huge knock-on effects on biodiversity conservation. Now, more than ever, we need scientists/researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to work together to face these threats head on, if we are to make any headway in reversing the current trends of decimating our planet's natural heritage and the benefits to people which it generates.</p><p>Effective conservation outcomes require collaboration between conservation practitioners and those who conduct the research that provides evidence in support of the implemented actions. Furthermore, the gap between theory and practice, despite recent progress (Jarvis <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>), is as wide as ever and much more still needs to be done. Conservation scientists need to develop research programmes that meet not only their own needs for research publications but also the needs of those who are directly working on the ground to advance positive outcomes for biodiversity across the planet. This requires funding bodies to acknowledge the benefits of applied research that is outcome-focused, as well as effective communication of research outcomes to those capable of their implementation (Kadykalo <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Toomey, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>With this editorial, we'd like to celebrate the successful first 10 years of this section of the journal in terms of the number of <i>Letters</i> published over these years, the high numbers of downloads and citations received by many of these publications, and the broad geographic representation in their authorship. Since its inception, we have so far published 39 <i>Letters</i> in this series, ranging from trophy hunting of fish (Costa-Pereira, <span>2016</span>), to the impacts of artisanal gold exploitation within protected areas in Madagascar (Cabeza <i>et al</i>., <span>
生物多样性危机仍在迅速发展,人们每天都在呼吁采取更多行动,拯救因直接和间接的人类活动及其他压力而濒临灭绝的物种和种群。人类足迹的扩大也导致了动物行为的改变,因为物种试图在日益破碎和改变的栖息地中生存迁移(Lehman 等人,2021 年)。2014 年 1 月 16 日,动物保护组织发起了一项新倡议,要求保护工作者和政策制定者告诉我们他们需要科学家提供哪些信息,以帮助他们在现实世界中有所作为。2014 年社论中提出的生物多样性面临的挑战在今天与 10 年前一样具有现实意义。生物多样性的丧失仍在继续,然而,与所需资金相比,用于保护的资金仍然微不足道,气候变化(最初的社论中并未提及)是我们这个时代面临的生存威胁,城市/基础设施/农业发展的压力会对生物多样性保护产生巨大的连锁反应。现在,我们比以往任何时候都更需要科学家/研究人员、实践者和决策者携手合作,直面这些威胁,这样才能在扭转当前地球自然遗产及其为人类带来的益处不断减少的趋势方面取得进展。此外,尽管最近取得了一些进展(贾维斯等人,2020 年),但理论与实践之间的差距仍然很大,仍有许多工作要做。保护科学家需要制定研究计划,不仅要满足自身对研究出版物的需求,还要满足那些直接在实地工作的人的需求,以推动整个地球的生物多样性取得积极成果。这就要求资助机构承认以成果为中心的应用研究的益处,并将研究成果有效地传达给有能力实施这些成果的人(Kadykalo et al.自创刊以来,我们已在该系列中发表了 39 篇通讯,内容涉及鱼类战利品狩猎(Costa-Pereira,2016 年)、马达加斯加保护区内手工开采黄金的影响(Cabeza et al、2019)、向渔民支付保护巴西濒危吉他鱼的费用(Wosnick, Da Costa De Lima Wosiak, & Machado Filho, 2020),以及公民科学在意大利开展保护行动中的作用(Battisti & Gippoliti, 2024)。从下载量来看,这些书信被广泛阅读,其中一些还被引用:根据我们出版商的数据,大多数书信的下载量至少在 500 次以上,有几篇超过了 1000 次。这些来信最令人高兴的一点是,它们来自广泛的国家(作者来自六大洲的 36 个国家),尤其是低收入国家,这让那些常常不为人知的声音也成为了国际保护期刊的作者。通过《来自保护前线的来信》,我们在《动物保护》中为保护工作者提供了一个平台,让他们强调他们需要从保护科学中获得特殊知识,以解决他们在保护前线所面临的问题。通过关注我们知识中的差距、分享经验和见解,这一系列《来信》的作者增加了声音的多样性,这些声音共同影响着保护研究、实践和政策。这种多样性对于制定有效的保护行动至关重要(Sandbrook et al.您的声音将被倾听,并能激发研究行动,从而改变您所面临的问题。如果您是研究人员,请阅读这些信件,了解您的研究如何能够帮助那些在前线为自然而战的人们。
{"title":"Ten years on for the Letter from the Conservation Front Line","authors":"Iain J. Gordon, Rahel Sollmann, Elina M. Rantanen, Jeff A. Johnson, Karl L. Evans, Vincenzo Penteriani, Philipp Boersch-Supan","doi":"10.1111/acv.12944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12944","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The biodiversity crisis continues apace, with daily calls for more action to save species and populations in peril from direct and indirect human activities and other pressures. The expanding human footprint is also causing alterations in animal behaviour, as species attempt to survive displacement in increasingly fragmented and modified habitats (Lehman <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). On 16 January 2014, <i>Animal Conservation</i> established a new initiative asking conservation practitioners and policymakers to tell us what information they need from scientists to help them make a difference in the real world. The <i>Letter from the Conservation Front Line</i> was born (Gordon <i>et al</i>., <span>2014</span>; herein also referred to as the <i>Letters</i>).</p><p>The challenges facing biodiversity raised in the 2014 editorial are as relevant today as they were 10 years ago. Biodiversity loss continues apace, and yet, funding for conservation is still a pittance relative to what is required, climate change (not mentioned in the original editorial) is the existential threat of our time, and pressures for urban/infrastructure/agricultural development can have huge knock-on effects on biodiversity conservation. Now, more than ever, we need scientists/researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to work together to face these threats head on, if we are to make any headway in reversing the current trends of decimating our planet's natural heritage and the benefits to people which it generates.</p><p>Effective conservation outcomes require collaboration between conservation practitioners and those who conduct the research that provides evidence in support of the implemented actions. Furthermore, the gap between theory and practice, despite recent progress (Jarvis <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>), is as wide as ever and much more still needs to be done. Conservation scientists need to develop research programmes that meet not only their own needs for research publications but also the needs of those who are directly working on the ground to advance positive outcomes for biodiversity across the planet. This requires funding bodies to acknowledge the benefits of applied research that is outcome-focused, as well as effective communication of research outcomes to those capable of their implementation (Kadykalo <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Toomey, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>With this editorial, we'd like to celebrate the successful first 10 years of this section of the journal in terms of the number of <i>Letters</i> published over these years, the high numbers of downloads and citations received by many of these publications, and the broad geographic representation in their authorship. Since its inception, we have so far published 39 <i>Letters</i> in this series, ranging from trophy hunting of fish (Costa-Pereira, <span>2016</span>), to the impacts of artisanal gold exploitation within protected areas in Madagascar (Cabeza <i>et al</i>., <span>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"139-140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12944","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140817179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
F. Z. Farneda, A. Otálora-Ardila, C. F. J. Meyer, H. F. López-Arévalo, C. Gómez-Posada, J. Polanía
Understanding the impacts of habitat conversion on species assemblages across multiple biodiversity dimensions (taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic) and spatial scales is pivotal for implementing effective conservation strategies. Here, we surveyed phyllostomid bats using mist nets in riparian and unflooded forests, flooded savannahs, and conventional rice fields to investigate how changes in habitat quality affect multifaceted diversity from two Colombian farming systems in the Orinoco Llanos: traditional farmlands with high-intensity agriculture (mainly rice production) and Civil Society Nature Reserves with greater ecosystem protection. We used a unified framework based on Hill numbers for quantifying bat taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and modeled the relationship of these diversity facets with landscape variables (habitat cover and patch density) across three spatial scales (0.5, 1.5, 3 km) using Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effect models. Our results indicate that increasing human activity toward rice monocultures representative of traditional farmlands negatively affected all diversity facets. In contrast, forested habitats associated mainly with riparian forests within private reserves contained higher taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity than savannahs and rice fields. However, the differences between riparian forests and rice crops were significant only for phylogenetic diversity, indicating loss of evolutionary history after habitat conversion. At the landscape scale, forest cover was a significant predictor for functional (0.5- and 3-km scale) and phylogenetic diversity (0.5 km), and bats responded negatively at the 3-km scale to rice patch density from a functional diversity perspective. Increasing habitat quality through preserving forest cover and patches should minimize the harmful effects of habitat conversion on multidimensional bat biodiversity. Furthermore, the conservation of riparian forests and the creation of more wildlife-friendly farming, as practiced in the reserves, should be prioritized to ensure high levels of bat taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity across Orinoco countryside landscapes.
{"title":"Multiple dimensions of phyllostomid bat biodiversity across ecosystems of the Orinoco Llanos","authors":"F. Z. Farneda, A. Otálora-Ardila, C. F. J. Meyer, H. F. López-Arévalo, C. Gómez-Posada, J. Polanía","doi":"10.1111/acv.12941","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12941","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the impacts of habitat conversion on species assemblages across multiple biodiversity dimensions (taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic) and spatial scales is pivotal for implementing effective conservation strategies. Here, we surveyed phyllostomid bats using mist nets in riparian and unflooded forests, flooded savannahs, and conventional rice fields to investigate how changes in habitat quality affect multifaceted diversity from two Colombian farming systems in the Orinoco Llanos: traditional farmlands with high-intensity agriculture (mainly rice production) and Civil Society Nature Reserves with greater ecosystem protection. We used a unified framework based on Hill numbers for quantifying bat taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and modeled the relationship of these diversity facets with landscape variables (habitat cover and patch density) across three spatial scales (0.5, 1.5, 3 km) using Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effect models. Our results indicate that increasing human activity toward rice monocultures representative of traditional farmlands negatively affected all diversity facets. In contrast, forested habitats associated mainly with riparian forests within private reserves contained higher taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity than savannahs and rice fields. However, the differences between riparian forests and rice crops were significant only for phylogenetic diversity, indicating loss of evolutionary history after habitat conversion. At the landscape scale, forest cover was a significant predictor for functional (0.5- and 3-km scale) and phylogenetic diversity (0.5 km), and bats responded negatively at the 3-km scale to rice patch density from a functional diversity perspective. Increasing habitat quality through preserving forest cover and patches should minimize the harmful effects of habitat conversion on multidimensional bat biodiversity. Furthermore, the conservation of riparian forests and the creation of more wildlife-friendly farming, as practiced in the reserves, should be prioritized to ensure high levels of bat taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity across Orinoco countryside landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 5","pages":"659-670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140670794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}