A. Ceia-Hasse, M. A. Thomson, E. A. Noguera-Urbano, J. C. Carrillo-Restrepo, C. A. Cruz-Rodríguez, C. A. Correa-Ayram, J. M. Ochoa-Quintero, I. M. D. Rosa
Primates are declining worldwide and rapid infrastructure expansion, particularly roads, threatens their habitat. New roads fragment habitats allowing anthropogenic activities to occur in once pristine ecosystems; this is particularly impactful in tropical areas with high endemic biodiversity, as is occurring with primates in Colombia. However, temporal assessments of how roads impact local biodiversity are rare. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the exposure of Colombian primates to roads from 1970 to 2015. Using a spatially explicit and species-specific approach, we estimated the critical road density and the critical patch size primate species can withstand before going locally extinct. Then, overlapping 15 primate species (~40% of the primate species present in Colombia) ranges with Colombia's road networks over time, we determined the road expansion scope within each habitat and consequent fragmentation. Comparing the species critical road density and patch size, we determined the degree of road exposure of each species over time and its vulnerability to local extinction. Our results show that between 1970 and 2015, there were nearly 40 000 km2 where at least one species was at risk of local extinction, due to road expansion, principally in the Andean and Caribbean regions. Primates in these regions faced the greatest exposure to road impacts, with an average 16% increase in the amount of affected habitat during this period. Species in most need of conservation based on road exposure rankings are: Cebus versicolor, Aotus griseimembra, Ateles hybridus, Saguinus leucopus and Saguinus oedipus. Our study contributes to understanding road impacts on local biodiversity in one of the biodiversity hotspots across the tropics and highlights the need of infrastructure accounting for the necessary mitigation and conservation actions.
{"title":"Primate extinction, the legacy of 40 years' road expansion in Colombia","authors":"A. Ceia-Hasse, M. A. Thomson, E. A. Noguera-Urbano, J. C. Carrillo-Restrepo, C. A. Cruz-Rodríguez, C. A. Correa-Ayram, J. M. Ochoa-Quintero, I. M. D. Rosa","doi":"10.1111/acv.12901","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12901","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Primates are declining worldwide and rapid infrastructure expansion, particularly roads, threatens their habitat. New roads fragment habitats allowing anthropogenic activities to occur in once pristine ecosystems; this is particularly impactful in tropical areas with high endemic biodiversity, as is occurring with primates in Colombia. However, temporal assessments of how roads impact local biodiversity are rare. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of the exposure of Colombian primates to roads from 1970 to 2015. Using a spatially explicit and species-specific approach, we estimated the critical road density and the critical patch size primate species can withstand before going locally extinct. Then, overlapping 15 primate species (~40% of the primate species present in Colombia) ranges with Colombia's road networks over time, we determined the road expansion scope within each habitat and consequent fragmentation. Comparing the species critical road density and patch size, we determined the degree of road exposure of each species over time and its vulnerability to local extinction. Our results show that between 1970 and 2015, there were nearly 40 000 km<sup>2</sup> where at least one species was at risk of local extinction, due to road expansion, principally in the Andean and Caribbean regions. Primates in these regions faced the greatest exposure to road impacts, with an average 16% increase in the amount of affected habitat during this period. Species in most need of conservation based on road exposure rankings are: <i>Cebus versicolor</i>, <i>Aotus griseimembra</i>, <i>Ateles hybridus</i>, <i>Saguinus leucopus</i> and <i>Saguinus oedipus</i>. Our study contributes to understanding road impacts on local biodiversity in one of the biodiversity hotspots across the tropics and highlights the need of infrastructure accounting for the necessary mitigation and conservation actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"226-239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49136103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The opportunity to spot charismatic megafauna in the wild, such as large-bodied mammals, has been promoted in ecotourism marketing to attract visitors and represents a popular wildlife-watching activity in African protected areas. However, increasing evidence shows that ecotourists' preferences to visit protected areas may be more diverse, expanding beyond charismatic megafauna. The wide-scale analysis carried out by Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) in Sub-Saharan Africa by using revealed preference methods identifies factors explaining higher visitation, as a proxy for protected areas' attractiveness. The results contribute to the literature, especially by identifying areas and species which are more likely to attract more visitors and be affected by both positive and negative impacts of ecotourism. The authors raise important questions regarding the need to further understand these impacts, which may include receiving higher revenues to support management but also neocolonial pressures, according to different contexts.</p><p>Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) found that beyond charismatic megafauna, areas with high bird diversity may also attract more visitors. Birdwatching is a growing niche in nature-based tourism attracting bird enthusiasts to diverse locations worldwide. In more remote and rural areas where charismatic megafauna do not occur (e.g., either naturally or as a consequence of human activities), birdwatching ecotourism may represent an important economic activity that could help align biodiversity conservation goals with rural development (Biggs <i>et al</i>., <span>2011</span>). However, the authors point out that other unmeasured park attributes or reasons may be driving visitation and the outcome of their models. Triangulating various sources of information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative information from surveys, and in-depth interviews) may contribute to complementing visitation data. This includes integrating insights from how preferences and perceptions are constructed in virtual social environments, such as social media platforms.</p><p>Content shared on social media (e.g., images, videos, and texts) has been used as a cost-efficient proxy for understanding a wide set of people-nature interactions, including ecotourists' preferences, visitation, and broader experiences in protected areas (Teles da Mota & Pickering, <span>2020</span>). Place-specific content from social media (e.g., geotagged photographs) could help unveil how factors of attractiveness found by Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) interplay with the plurality of reasons underpinning visitation at more local scales, for example, by assessing whether bird diversity or birdwatching activities are reflected in social media content posted in relation to bird-rich areas. Moreover, social media data could provide further insights into complementary results by unveiling emerging preferences and meanings which may not
{"title":"How virtual representations of ecotourists' experiences on social media may shape meanings and preferences: insights for future research complementing visitation data","authors":"A. Hausmann","doi":"10.1111/acv.12897","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12897","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The opportunity to spot charismatic megafauna in the wild, such as large-bodied mammals, has been promoted in ecotourism marketing to attract visitors and represents a popular wildlife-watching activity in African protected areas. However, increasing evidence shows that ecotourists' preferences to visit protected areas may be more diverse, expanding beyond charismatic megafauna. The wide-scale analysis carried out by Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) in Sub-Saharan Africa by using revealed preference methods identifies factors explaining higher visitation, as a proxy for protected areas' attractiveness. The results contribute to the literature, especially by identifying areas and species which are more likely to attract more visitors and be affected by both positive and negative impacts of ecotourism. The authors raise important questions regarding the need to further understand these impacts, which may include receiving higher revenues to support management but also neocolonial pressures, according to different contexts.</p><p>Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) found that beyond charismatic megafauna, areas with high bird diversity may also attract more visitors. Birdwatching is a growing niche in nature-based tourism attracting bird enthusiasts to diverse locations worldwide. In more remote and rural areas where charismatic megafauna do not occur (e.g., either naturally or as a consequence of human activities), birdwatching ecotourism may represent an important economic activity that could help align biodiversity conservation goals with rural development (Biggs <i>et al</i>., <span>2011</span>). However, the authors point out that other unmeasured park attributes or reasons may be driving visitation and the outcome of their models. Triangulating various sources of information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative information from surveys, and in-depth interviews) may contribute to complementing visitation data. This includes integrating insights from how preferences and perceptions are constructed in virtual social environments, such as social media platforms.</p><p>Content shared on social media (e.g., images, videos, and texts) has been used as a cost-efficient proxy for understanding a wide set of people-nature interactions, including ecotourists' preferences, visitation, and broader experiences in protected areas (Teles da Mota & Pickering, <span>2020</span>). Place-specific content from social media (e.g., geotagged photographs) could help unveil how factors of attractiveness found by Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) interplay with the plurality of reasons underpinning visitation at more local scales, for example, by assessing whether bird diversity or birdwatching activities are reflected in social media content posted in relation to bird-rich areas. Moreover, social media data could provide further insights into complementary results by unveiling emerging preferences and meanings which may not ","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"26 4","pages":"446-447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12897","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45040699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>We thank Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) and Hausmann (<span>2023</span>) for their perceptive commentaries on our study of what attracts ecotourists to Sub-Saharan African protected areas (Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Because our study relied on tourist visit data that lacked any demographic information, we were unable to differentiate between the preferences of different tourist segments, but we agree with Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) that this is a critical next step in understanding how ecotourism can aid conservation. Specifically, domestic, intra-African, and diasporic ecotourists likely have different “ecotourist gazes”—i.e., “way[s] in which tourists view the people and places they visit”—that our paper was unable to disentangle (Stone & Nyaupane, <span>2019</span>, p. 2; Lindsey <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>; Urry, <span>1992</span>). Indeed, our results that bird diversity appears to matter to tourists may be particularly representative of intra-African ecotourists: Lindsey <i>et al</i>. (<span>2007</span>) showed that bird diversity was much more important to African than non-African visitors to South African protected areas. Disentangling the varied preferences of different types of tourists will be essential to help protected areas adapt to the possibility of future pandemics and growing African populations (Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Our study sought to examine the importance of the Big Five across Sub-Saharan Africa (specifically: elephants, rhinos, lions, buffalo, and leopards), but we agree with Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) that regional analyses are key to supporting the full diversity of African protected areas and wildlife. In particular, Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) note the longstanding underrepresentation of Central African wildlife and ecotourism in the published literature. Our study did not consider range-restricted species like mountain gorilla (<i>Gorilla beringei</i>), which is found only in the forests of the Congo basin. While we believe that general, large-scale analyses examining continent-wide patterns are useful, complementing this level of insight with analyses of the relationships between regional species and ecotourists will be key for sustaining protected areas across the continent.</p><p>Hausmann (<span>2023</span>) suggests that social media data might help fill these research gaps. Images, text, and videos shared on social media platforms could indeed help reveal “tourist gazes” (Stone & Nyaupane, <span>2019</span>). Moreover, these data could better show the variation in tourist gazes across locations and ecotourist origins. Yet Hausmann also cautions that these data must be critically considered, since they may exaggerate certain shareable ‘tourist imaginaries’ and underrepresent less viral but still important elements of the relationships e
我们感谢Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro(2023)和Hausmann(2023)对我们关于吸引生态游客到撒哈拉以南非洲保护区的研究的敏锐评论(Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, 2022)。由于我们的研究依赖于缺乏任何人口统计信息的游客访问数据,我们无法区分不同游客群体的偏好,但我们同意Scholte, Kamgang和Sabuhoro(2023)的观点,即这是理解生态旅游如何帮助保护的关键下一步。具体来说,国内、非洲内部和散居的生态游客可能有不同的“生态旅游视角”——即:,“游客看待他们所参观的人和地方的方式”——这是我们的论文无法解开的(Stone & Nyaupane, 2019,第2页;Lindsey et al., 2007;> 1992)。事实上,我们关于鸟类多样性似乎对游客很重要的研究结果可能特别具有非洲内部生态游客的代表性:Lindsey等人(2007)表明,鸟类多样性对南非保护区的非洲游客比非非洲游客更重要。解开不同类型游客的不同偏好对于帮助保护区适应未来流行病和非洲人口增长的可能性至关重要(Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro, 2023)。我们的研究试图检验撒哈拉以南非洲五大动物(特别是大象、犀牛、狮子、水牛和豹子)的重要性,但我们同意Scholte、Kamgang和Sabuhoro(2023)的观点,即区域分析是支持非洲保护区和野生动物充分多样性的关键。特别是,Scholte, Kamgang和Sabuhoro(2023)注意到中非野生动物和生态旅游在已发表文献中的代表性长期不足。我们的研究没有考虑像山地大猩猩这样的范围有限的物种,它们只存在于刚果盆地的森林中。虽然我们认为,对整个大陆的模式进行全面、大规模的分析是有用的,但通过分析区域物种和生态游客之间的关系来补充这一层次的洞察力,将是维持整个大陆保护区的关键。Hausmann(2023)认为社交媒体数据可能有助于填补这些研究空白。在社交媒体平台上分享的图片、文字和视频确实有助于揭示“游客的目光”(Stone & Nyaupane, 2019)。此外,这些数据可以更好地显示不同地点和生态旅游来源的游客目光的变化。然而,豪斯曼也警告说,这些数据必须谨慎考虑,因为它们可能夸大了某些可共享的“游客想象”,并没有充分反映出生态游客与保护区之间关系中不那么具有病毒性但仍然重要的因素。定性数据可能有助于最有效地解释社交媒体数据(Snelson, 2016)。除了描述现有的意义之外,研究人员还可以研究如何利用生态游客与目的地建立的关系来促进这些地区当地适当的保护和恢复(Olmsted et al., 2020)。豪斯曼(2023)也重申了我们的担忧,即生态旅游的优先事项和偏好可能取代当地居民的优先事项和偏好。因此,除了澄清不同类型生态游客的各种偏好外,我们还必须寻求将这些与生活在保护区内的人的价值观,优先事项和偏好相结合,特别是这些地方的长期居民(例如,Kihima & Kimura, 2013)。这样做需要深刻地理解这些当地的关系价值观,包括以自己的方式代表它们,而不是强迫它们进入经济或西方价值观的“理性”逻辑(Satterfield等人,2013;Chan et al., 2016;怀特,2018;Gould等人,2019;IPBES, 2022)。我们赞同许多非洲学者的建议,即这项研究将需要“全球科学”来多元化对非洲生态旅游的理解,包括通过承认和支持非洲学者的贡献(Asase et al., 2022)。例如,最近对新热带鸟类学的一项分析发现,尽管存在以其他语言出版的描述,但许多关于新热带鸟类的自然历史数据在英语世界鸟类平台上被列为不存在
{"title":"Towards ecotourism that nurtures local visions for landscapes and wildlife","authors":"H. N. Eyster, R. Naidoo, K. M. A. Chan","doi":"10.1111/acv.12900","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12900","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) and Hausmann (<span>2023</span>) for their perceptive commentaries on our study of what attracts ecotourists to Sub-Saharan African protected areas (Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Because our study relied on tourist visit data that lacked any demographic information, we were unable to differentiate between the preferences of different tourist segments, but we agree with Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) that this is a critical next step in understanding how ecotourism can aid conservation. Specifically, domestic, intra-African, and diasporic ecotourists likely have different “ecotourist gazes”—i.e., “way[s] in which tourists view the people and places they visit”—that our paper was unable to disentangle (Stone & Nyaupane, <span>2019</span>, p. 2; Lindsey <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>; Urry, <span>1992</span>). Indeed, our results that bird diversity appears to matter to tourists may be particularly representative of intra-African ecotourists: Lindsey <i>et al</i>. (<span>2007</span>) showed that bird diversity was much more important to African than non-African visitors to South African protected areas. Disentangling the varied preferences of different types of tourists will be essential to help protected areas adapt to the possibility of future pandemics and growing African populations (Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro, <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Our study sought to examine the importance of the Big Five across Sub-Saharan Africa (specifically: elephants, rhinos, lions, buffalo, and leopards), but we agree with Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) that regional analyses are key to supporting the full diversity of African protected areas and wildlife. In particular, Scholte, Kamgang, & Sabuhoro (<span>2023</span>) note the longstanding underrepresentation of Central African wildlife and ecotourism in the published literature. Our study did not consider range-restricted species like mountain gorilla (<i>Gorilla beringei</i>), which is found only in the forests of the Congo basin. While we believe that general, large-scale analyses examining continent-wide patterns are useful, complementing this level of insight with analyses of the relationships between regional species and ecotourists will be key for sustaining protected areas across the continent.</p><p>Hausmann (<span>2023</span>) suggests that social media data might help fill these research gaps. Images, text, and videos shared on social media platforms could indeed help reveal “tourist gazes” (Stone & Nyaupane, <span>2019</span>). Moreover, these data could better show the variation in tourist gazes across locations and ecotourist origins. Yet Hausmann also cautions that these data must be critically considered, since they may exaggerate certain shareable ‘tourist imaginaries’ and underrepresent less viral but still important elements of the relationships e","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"26 4","pages":"448-449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12900","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43843478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Ecotourism has increasingly been recognized as an important source of revenue for protected areas as well as their surrounding communities (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, <span>2022</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Particularly in southern and eastern Africa, ecotourism is linked with charismatic species - the Big Five-, i.e., African elephant (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>), rhinoceros (<i>Diceros bicornis</i>, <i>Ceratotherius simum</i>), lion (<i>Panthera leo</i>), African buffalo (<i>Syncerus caffer</i>), and leopard (<i>Panthera pardus</i>). In ‘Not just the Big Five: African ecotourists prefer parks brimming with bird diversity’, Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) show how ecotourists also value birdwatching and viewing other wildlife. Ecotourism-based initiatives founded on local cultures can also be found (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). This recent research shows that reigning conservation interventions such as reintroducing Big Five species, which drain scarce budgets, may be directed to other attractions -birds, culture-, more effectively in the long run (Mbaiwa, <span>2015</span>). This has significant implications for biodiversity conservation and how tourism may benefit local economies in sub-Saharan Africa (Mbaiwa, <span>2015</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) explicitly mention their focus on southern Africa and East Africa (SSE), a regional perspective that is very common (Bauer <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). The authors' choice of ‘Big Five alternatives’ – giraffe (<i>Giraffa</i> spp.), cheetah (<i>Acinonyx jubatus</i>), wild dog (<i>Lycaon pictus</i>), birds – is limited to savannas species, thereby neglecting African forest species, such as mountain gorilla (<i>Gorilla beringei</i>) and chimpanzee (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>), the backbone of a flourishing ecotourism industry in Rwanda, Uganda and beyond (Sabuhoro <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). This also holds for burgeoning ecotourism targeting lowland gorillas (<i>Gorilla gorilla</i>) (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon) and Ethiopian mountain endemics such as walia ibex (<i>Capra walie</i>) and mountain nyala (<i>Tragelaphus buxtoni</i>).</p><p>COVID-19 was a wake-up call, demonstrating too much reliance on ecotourism in Africa and beyond, a lesson all too easy to forget (Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Much less known have been the consequences of a degrading security situation in West-Central-Horn (WCH) of Africa over the recent decade (Bauer <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). The WCH part of the annual ecotourism visit map that Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) present has turned since 2007, with the exception of the western coastal parts, completely red or orange, i.e. (formally) advising against travel, invalidating, amongst other things, travel insurance policies (Figure 1). In WCH Africa, on
生态旅游越来越被认为是保护区及其周边社区的重要收入来源(Hausmann et al., 2016;Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, 2022;Gupta et al., 2023)。特别是在非洲南部和东部,生态旅游与具有魅力的物种“五大”有关,即非洲象(Loxodonta africana)、犀牛(Diceros bicornis, Ceratotherius simum)、狮子(Panthera leo)、非洲水牛(Syncerus caffer)和豹(Panthera pardus)。在“不仅仅是五大:非洲生态游客更喜欢充满鸟类多样性的公园”中,Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)展示了生态游客如何重视观鸟和观赏其他野生动物。也可以找到基于当地文化的生态旅游倡议(Hausmann et al., 2016)。最近的研究表明,从长远来看,像重新引入五大物种这样消耗稀缺预算的主流保护干预措施,可能会更有效地针对其他景点——鸟类、文化(Mbaiwa, 2015)。这对生物多样性保护以及旅游业如何使撒哈拉以南非洲的当地经济受益具有重要意义(Mbaiwa, 2015;Gupta et al., 2023)。Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)明确提到了他们对南部非洲和东非(SSE)的关注,这是一种非常常见的区域视角(Bauer等人,2020)。作者选择的“五大选择”——长颈鹿(Giraffa spp.)、猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)、野狗(Lycaon pictus)、鸟类——仅限于热带草原物种,从而忽略了非洲森林物种,如山地大猩猩(gorilla beringei)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes),它们是卢旺达、乌干达等地蓬勃发展的生态旅游业的支柱(Sabuhoro et al., 2017)。这也适用于以低地大猩猩(大猩猩)(喀麦隆、中非共和国、加蓬)和埃塞俄比亚山地特有物种如瓦利亚野山羊(Capra walie)和山地尼亚拉(Tragelaphus buxtoni)为目标的新兴生态旅游。2019冠状病毒病是一个警钟,表明非洲及其他地区过于依赖生态旅游,这是一个很容易忘记的教训(Gupta et al., 2023)。近十年来,非洲中西部之角(WCH)安全局势恶化的后果鲜为人知(Bauer et al., 2020)。Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)提出的年度生态旅游访问地图的WCH部分自2007年以来已经转变,除了西部沿海部分,完全是红色或橙色,即(正式)建议不要旅行,取消旅行保险政策(图1)。在WCH非洲,曾经繁荣的生态旅游景点,如Waza国家公园(喀麦隆)已经崩溃,只有战利品狩猎在该地区保持(Scholte, 2021;Scholte et al., 2022)。撒哈拉以南非洲地区的人口预计将增加两倍,从2017年的约10亿人增加到2100年的30亿人(Vollset et al., 2020)。当Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan(2022)建议扩大生态旅游的范围时,他们似乎指的是国际旅游,而没有考虑到由人口变化引发的仍未开发的国内和非洲内部旅游,这些旅游预计将大幅增加(Stone & Nyaupane, 2019)。人们只能推测这些变化对生态旅游的影响。少数关于非洲国内旅游的研究表明,“文化、生计和拥挤的空间,以及各种各样的活动,影响着国内游客的目光,而隐私、宁静和安静影响着国际游客的目光”(Stone & Nyaupane, 2019)。例如,仅2022年就有超过100万游客前往埃塞俄比亚,针对侨民市场的生态旅游受到的关注就更少了,人们想知道它的“生态旅游目光”会是什么样子。以国际游客和越来越多的国内游客为基础的非洲生态旅游,预计将继续在保护区和邻近地区发挥重要作用
{"title":"Beyond the Big Five and Birds: Divergent ecotourism perspectives in rapidly changing Africa","authors":"P. Scholte, S. A. Kamgang, E. Sabuhoro","doi":"10.1111/acv.12891","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12891","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecotourism has increasingly been recognized as an important source of revenue for protected areas as well as their surrounding communities (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan, <span>2022</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Particularly in southern and eastern Africa, ecotourism is linked with charismatic species - the Big Five-, i.e., African elephant (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>), rhinoceros (<i>Diceros bicornis</i>, <i>Ceratotherius simum</i>), lion (<i>Panthera leo</i>), African buffalo (<i>Syncerus caffer</i>), and leopard (<i>Panthera pardus</i>). In ‘Not just the Big Five: African ecotourists prefer parks brimming with bird diversity’, Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) show how ecotourists also value birdwatching and viewing other wildlife. Ecotourism-based initiatives founded on local cultures can also be found (Hausmann <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>). This recent research shows that reigning conservation interventions such as reintroducing Big Five species, which drain scarce budgets, may be directed to other attractions -birds, culture-, more effectively in the long run (Mbaiwa, <span>2015</span>). This has significant implications for biodiversity conservation and how tourism may benefit local economies in sub-Saharan Africa (Mbaiwa, <span>2015</span>; Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) explicitly mention their focus on southern Africa and East Africa (SSE), a regional perspective that is very common (Bauer <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). The authors' choice of ‘Big Five alternatives’ – giraffe (<i>Giraffa</i> spp.), cheetah (<i>Acinonyx jubatus</i>), wild dog (<i>Lycaon pictus</i>), birds – is limited to savannas species, thereby neglecting African forest species, such as mountain gorilla (<i>Gorilla beringei</i>) and chimpanzee (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>), the backbone of a flourishing ecotourism industry in Rwanda, Uganda and beyond (Sabuhoro <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). This also holds for burgeoning ecotourism targeting lowland gorillas (<i>Gorilla gorilla</i>) (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Gabon) and Ethiopian mountain endemics such as walia ibex (<i>Capra walie</i>) and mountain nyala (<i>Tragelaphus buxtoni</i>).</p><p>COVID-19 was a wake-up call, demonstrating too much reliance on ecotourism in Africa and beyond, a lesson all too easy to forget (Gupta <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Much less known have been the consequences of a degrading security situation in West-Central-Horn (WCH) of Africa over the recent decade (Bauer <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). The WCH part of the annual ecotourism visit map that Eyster, Naidoo, & Chan (<span>2022</span>) present has turned since 2007, with the exception of the western coastal parts, completely red or orange, i.e. (formally) advising against travel, invalidating, amongst other things, travel insurance policies (Figure 1). In WCH Africa, on","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"26 4","pages":"443-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12891","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41257494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Laux, K. Mayer, W. Beeke, M. Waltert, E. Gottschalk
Predation and habitat deterioration are the main reasons for the strong decline of ground-nesting farmland birds such as the grey partridge Perdix perdix in Europe. Grey partridge nests and incubating females are especially vulnerable to predation. We have previously demonstrated that predator activity is much lower inside flower blocks (agri-environment schemes sown with a flower seed mix) than at their edges and that predator activity in flower blocks depends on the surrounding landscape. Here, we investigate whether these differences in predator activity translate into differences in grey partridge nest predation and assess predation patterns relative to landscape and nest site characteristics. We recorded the success of 56 nests of radio-tagged grey partridges between 2009 and 2017 in an agricultural landscape in Central Germany. We used Bayesian logistic regression to analyse the effects of nest site and landscape characteristics on nest predation on a subset of 46 nests (21 nests successful, 25 predated). Distance to the edge of the nesting habitat was the most important predictor, reducing predation probability from 66.8% at the edge to 18.5% at 85.5 m. Predation probability decreased with increasing length of habitat borders, habitat diversity and the area of permanent grasslands and fallows. Predation probability was higher further from settlements and increased with increasing woodland area in the agricultural matrix. When considering linear landscape structures, nest predation patterns matched the patterns of predator activity from our previous studies. Results suggest that the distance to the edge of the nesting habitat is most important and that nest predation may be reduced by providing sufficiently broad nesting habitats. Nest predation may further be minimized by increasing habitat diversity and coverage of extensive vegetation types and by establishing conservation measures for grey partridges further away from woodlands. These measures may also benefit other ground-nesting farmland birds.
{"title":"Distance to the edge and other landscape features influence nest predation in grey partridges","authors":"A. Laux, K. Mayer, W. Beeke, M. Waltert, E. Gottschalk","doi":"10.1111/acv.12898","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12898","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predation and habitat deterioration are the main reasons for the strong decline of ground-nesting farmland birds such as the grey partridge <i>Perdix perdix</i> in Europe. Grey partridge nests and incubating females are especially vulnerable to predation. We have previously demonstrated that predator activity is much lower inside flower blocks (agri-environment schemes sown with a flower seed mix) than at their edges and that predator activity in flower blocks depends on the surrounding landscape. Here, we investigate whether these differences in predator activity translate into differences in grey partridge nest predation and assess predation patterns relative to landscape and nest site characteristics. We recorded the success of 56 nests of radio-tagged grey partridges between 2009 and 2017 in an agricultural landscape in Central Germany. We used Bayesian logistic regression to analyse the effects of nest site and landscape characteristics on nest predation on a subset of 46 nests (21 nests successful, 25 predated). Distance to the edge of the nesting habitat was the most important predictor, reducing predation probability from 66.8% at the edge to 18.5% at 85.5 m. Predation probability decreased with increasing length of habitat borders, habitat diversity and the area of permanent grasslands and fallows. Predation probability was higher further from settlements and increased with increasing woodland area in the agricultural matrix. When considering linear landscape structures, nest predation patterns matched the patterns of predator activity from our previous studies. Results suggest that the distance to the edge of the nesting habitat is most important and that nest predation may be reduced by providing sufficiently broad nesting habitats. Nest predation may further be minimized by increasing habitat diversity and coverage of extensive vegetation types and by establishing conservation measures for grey partridges further away from woodlands. These measures may also benefit other ground-nesting farmland birds.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"196-211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12898","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49445834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T. Caro, R. S. Rashid, J. Zeltman, L.-M. Gierse, R. Sollmann
Widely dispersed fragmented populations are a challenge to monitor because subpopulation sizes may be very small, difficult to access and time consuming to sample regularly. We use the coconut crab (Birgus latro) on Pemba, United Republic of Zanzibar as a case study for estimating highly fragmented populations and metapopulation sizes. The species is a very large terrestrial decapod threatened by exploitation and habitat alteration and now classified as vulnerable. We developed an integrated model to analyse capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data from five sites jointly with count data from 24 sites to estimate site-level densities and population sizes, predicted total population size across the Pemba archipelago, and investigated the effect of six predictors of human influence on density. We fitted separate models to test the effect of the same predictors on raw counts and individual body mass. We estimate the total population of coconut crabs on the Pemba archipelago to be c. 6700 terrestrial individuals. We show that government protection generally affects crabs positively, whereas presence of agriculture negatively affects their densities. This study highlights that time-consuming CMR data can be leveraged to estimate densities on less visited sites, and that fully protected islands are critical for maintaining relatively high population densities. Our overall population estimate suggests that Pemba still hosts a viable coconut crab population in a part of its range where the species is otherwise in steep decline.
{"title":"Meta- and subpopulation estimation with disparate data: coconut crabs in the Western Indian Ocean","authors":"T. Caro, R. S. Rashid, J. Zeltman, L.-M. Gierse, R. Sollmann","doi":"10.1111/acv.12896","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12896","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Widely dispersed fragmented populations are a challenge to monitor because subpopulation sizes may be very small, difficult to access and time consuming to sample regularly. We use the coconut crab (<i>Birgus latro</i>) on Pemba, United Republic of Zanzibar as a case study for estimating highly fragmented populations and metapopulation sizes. The species is a very large terrestrial decapod threatened by exploitation and habitat alteration and now classified as vulnerable. We developed an integrated model to analyse capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data from five sites jointly with count data from 24 sites to estimate site-level densities and population sizes, predicted total population size across the Pemba archipelago, and investigated the effect of six predictors of human influence on density. We fitted separate models to test the effect of the same predictors on raw counts and individual body mass. We estimate the total population of coconut crabs on the Pemba archipelago to be <i>c</i>. 6700 terrestrial individuals. We show that government protection generally affects crabs positively, whereas presence of agriculture negatively affects their densities. This study highlights that time-consuming CMR data can be leveraged to estimate densities on less visited sites, and that fully protected islands are critical for maintaining relatively high population densities. Our overall population estimate suggests that Pemba still hosts a viable coconut crab population in a part of its range where the species is otherwise in steep decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"184-195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12896","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42035054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. E. Trask, C. Carraro, R. Kock, R. McCrea, S. Newland, E. Royer, S. Medina, D. Fontenot, J. G. Ewen
Ex situ threatened species management has both conservation and welfare objectives and these objectives often align, but can diverge. Areas of agreement can present win-wins for achieving welfare and conservation objectives, while identifying areas of divergence is important to ensure management strategies achieve balance across objectives. We examined welfare and conservation objectives in the ex situ population of Extinct in the Wild sihek (Guam kingfisher, Todiramphus cinnamominus) by quantifying mortality rates, determining sex- and age-specific causes of mortality and identifying associated welfare domains, as well as quantifying sex- and age-specific differences in reproductive value and contributions to variation in population growth rate (λ). Females had significantly higher mortality rates than males, potentially impacting population viability and suggesting females may be more vulnerable to experiencing lower welfare than males. Mitigating causes of female mortality would therefore present a clear win-win for both welfare and conservation objectives. Both causes of mortality and contributions to variation in λ were found to differ across sex- and age-classes. In particular, nutritional and metabolic diseases tended to impact younger age-classes and these age-classes had large contributions to variation in λ. Mitigation of these diseases could therefore also present a win-win for welfare and conservation objectives. However, we also identified a potential divergence between objectives: a major cause of female mortality was reproductive disease with older aged females primarily affected, but older aged females contributed little to variation in λ and had low reproductive value. Developing mitigation strategies for reproductive disease could therefore aid welfare objectives but have little benefit for conservation objectives, suggesting careful balancing across objectives is required. Our results highlight the need to explicitly consider conservation and welfare objectives in threatened species management, in particular in the context of an increasing conservation need for ex situ population management, coupled with increasing social concern for animal welfare.
受威胁物种的异地管理既有保护目标,也有福利目标,这些目标往往是一致的,但也可能存在分歧。一致的领域可以实现福利和保护目标的双赢,而找出分歧的领域对于确保管理策略实现目标之间的平衡非常重要。我们通过量化关岛翠鸟(Extinct in the Wild sihek,Todiramphus cinnamominus)的死亡率、确定不同性别和年龄的死亡原因、识别相关的福利领域以及量化不同性别和年龄的繁殖价值差异和对种群增长率(λ)变化的贡献,考察了关岛翠鸟(Extinct in the Wild sihek,Todiramphus cinnamominus)异地种群的福利和保护目标。雌性的死亡率明显高于雄性,这可能会影响种群的生存能力,同时也表明雌性可能比雄性更容易遭受较低的福利。因此,降低雌性死亡率显然是实现福利和保护目标的双赢之举。研究发现,不同性别和年龄组的λ的死亡原因和对λ变化的贡献都不尽相同。特别是,营养和代谢疾病往往影响较年轻的年龄组,而这些年龄组对 λ 的变化贡献较大。因此,缓解这些疾病也能实现福利和保护目标的双赢。然而,我们也发现了目标之间的潜在分歧:雌性动物死亡的一个主要原因是生殖疾病,主要受影响的是年龄较大的雌性动物,但年龄较大的雌性动物对λ的变化贡献不大,且生殖价值较低。因此,针对生殖疾病制定缓解策略可能有助于实现福利目标,但对保护目标的益处不大,这表明需要谨慎平衡不同目标之间的关系。我们的研究结果凸显了在濒危物种管理中明确考虑保护和福利目标的必要性,尤其是在保护对异地种群管理的需求日益增长,同时社会对动物福利的关注也日益增加的背景下。
{"title":"Balancing conservation and welfare in ex situ management of the extinct-in-the-wild sihek: sex- and age-specific causes of mortality and contributions to population growth rate","authors":"A. E. Trask, C. Carraro, R. Kock, R. McCrea, S. Newland, E. Royer, S. Medina, D. Fontenot, J. G. Ewen","doi":"10.1111/acv.12895","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12895","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ex situ threatened species management has both conservation and welfare objectives and these objectives often align, but can diverge. Areas of agreement can present win-wins for achieving welfare and conservation objectives, while identifying areas of divergence is important to ensure management strategies achieve balance across objectives. We examined welfare and conservation objectives in the ex situ population of Extinct in the Wild sihek (Guam kingfisher, <i>Todiramphus cinnamominus</i>) by quantifying mortality rates, determining sex- and age-specific causes of mortality and identifying associated welfare domains, as well as quantifying sex- and age-specific differences in reproductive value and contributions to variation in population growth rate (<i>λ</i>). Females had significantly higher mortality rates than males, potentially impacting population viability and suggesting females may be more vulnerable to experiencing lower welfare than males. Mitigating causes of female mortality would therefore present a clear win-win for both welfare and conservation objectives. Both causes of mortality and contributions to variation in <i>λ</i> were found to differ across sex- and age-classes. In particular, nutritional and metabolic diseases tended to impact younger age-classes and these age-classes had large contributions to variation in <i>λ</i>. Mitigation of these diseases could therefore also present a win-win for welfare and conservation objectives. However, we also identified a potential divergence between objectives: a major cause of female mortality was reproductive disease with older aged females primarily affected, but older aged females contributed little to variation in <i>λ</i> and had low reproductive value. Developing mitigation strategies for reproductive disease could therefore aid welfare objectives but have little benefit for conservation objectives, suggesting careful balancing across objectives is required. Our results highlight the need to explicitly consider conservation and welfare objectives in threatened species management, in particular in the context of an increasing conservation need for ex situ population management, coupled with increasing social concern for animal welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"171-183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48333543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R. D. Crego, J. Fennessy, M. B. Brown, G. Connette, J. Stacy-Dawes, S. Masiaine, J. A. Stabach
The conservation of threatened and rare species in remote areas often presents two challenges: there may be unknown populations that have not yet been documented and there is a need to identify suitable habitat to translocate individuals and help populations recover. This is the case of the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa reticulata), a species of high conservation priority for which: (a) there may be unknown populations in remote areas, and (b) detailed maps of suitable habitat available within its range are lacking. We implemented a species distribution modeling (SDM) workflow in Google Earth Engine, combining GPS telemetry data of 31 reticulated giraffe with Landsat 8 OLI, Advanced Land Observing Satellite Phased Arrayed L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar, and surface ruggedness layers to predict suitable habitat at 30-m spatial resolution across the potential range of the species. Models had high predictive power, with a mean AUC-PR of 0.88 (SD: 0.02; range: 0.86–0.91), mean sensitivity of 0.85 (SD: 0.04; range: 0.80–0.91), and mean precision was 0.81 (SD: 0.02; range: 0.79–0.83). Model predictions were also consistent with two independent validation datasets, with higher predicted suitable habitat values at known occurrence locations than at a random set of locations (P < 0.01). Our model predicted a total of 5519 km2 of potentially suitable habitat in Kenya, 963 km2 in Ethiopia, and 147 km2 in Somalia. Our results indicate that is possible to combine moderate spatial resolution imagery with telemetry data to guide conservation programs of threatened terrestrial species. We provide a free web app where managers can visualize and interact with the 30 m resolution map to help guide future surveys to search for existing populations and to inform future reintroduction assessments. We present all analysis code as a framework that could be adapted for other species across the globe.
{"title":"Combining species distribution models and moderate resolution satellite information to guide conservation programs for reticulated giraffe","authors":"R. D. Crego, J. Fennessy, M. B. Brown, G. Connette, J. Stacy-Dawes, S. Masiaine, J. A. Stabach","doi":"10.1111/acv.12894","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12894","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The conservation of threatened and rare species in remote areas often presents two challenges: there may be unknown populations that have not yet been documented and there is a need to identify suitable habitat to translocate individuals and help populations recover. This is the case of the reticulated giraffe (<i>Giraffa reticulata</i>), a species of high conservation priority for which: (a) there may be unknown populations in remote areas, and (b) detailed maps of suitable habitat available within its range are lacking. We implemented a species distribution modeling (SDM) workflow in Google Earth Engine, combining GPS telemetry data of 31 reticulated giraffe with Landsat 8 OLI, Advanced Land Observing Satellite Phased Arrayed L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar, and surface ruggedness layers to predict suitable habitat at 30-m spatial resolution across the potential range of the species. Models had high predictive power, with a mean AUC-PR of 0.88 (SD: 0.02; range: 0.86–0.91), mean sensitivity of 0.85 (SD: 0.04; range: 0.80–0.91), and mean precision was 0.81 (SD: 0.02; range: 0.79–0.83). Model predictions were also consistent with two independent validation datasets, with higher predicted suitable habitat values at known occurrence locations than at a random set of locations (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Our model predicted a total of 5519 km<sup>2</sup> of potentially suitable habitat in Kenya, 963 km<sup>2</sup> in Ethiopia, and 147 km<sup>2</sup> in Somalia. Our results indicate that is possible to combine moderate spatial resolution imagery with telemetry data to guide conservation programs of threatened terrestrial species. We provide a free web app where managers can visualize and interact with the 30 m resolution map to help guide future surveys to search for existing populations and to inform future reintroduction assessments. We present all analysis code as a framework that could be adapted for other species across the globe.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"160-170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46789542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. K. Snowden, D. M. Shier, K. M. Stemp, G. F. Grether
Translocation programmes for endangered species typically focus on a single species, but in areas where little native habitat remains, it may be necessary to translocate multiple species to the same sites. Interactions between translocated species, such as predation and competition, are among the factors that need to be considered when planning multispecies translocations. Translocation sites for aquatic species are particularly scarce in southern California, where a limited number of sites exist for historically co-occurring endangered mountain yellow-legged frogs Rana muscosa and unarmoured three-spine sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni. To determine how these species would interact if translocated to the same sites, we carried out experiments ex situ with R. muscosa tadpoles and a surrogate subspecies of stickleback (G. a. microcephalus). We found that (1) adult sticklebacks preyed on hatchling tadpoles but did not consume R. muscosa eggs or large tadpoles; (2) tadpoles did not consume stickleback eggs or disturb sticklebacks nests; and (3) both species' microhabitat use shifted slightly when the other was present. Our results suggest that these species can likely be co-managed successfully, if measures are taken to curb stickleback predation on tadpoles until the R. muscosa population is well established. Using ex situ studies to evaluate species interactions prior to translocation is an approach that could prove useful in other species recovery programmes. Multispecies translocations could make better use of available resources when habitat is limited and promote ecosystem recovery by re-establishing interactions among native species.
濒危物种迁地计划通常以单一物种为重点,但在本土栖息地所剩无几的地区,可能有必要将多个物种迁至同一地点。在规划多物种迁移时,需要考虑迁移物种之间的相互作用,如捕食和竞争。在加利福尼亚州南部,水生物种的迁移地点尤其稀缺,历史上共同出现的濒危山黄腿蛙(Rana muscosa)和无甲三刺粘背蛙(Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni)的迁移地点数量有限。为了确定如果将这些物种迁移到相同的地点,它们将如何相互作用,我们在原地对黄腿蛙蝌蚪和代用的棍棒鱼亚种(G. a. microcephalus)进行了实验。我们发现:(1)成年棍棒鱼会捕食孵化的蝌蚪,但不会吃掉麝香鱼卵或大蝌蚪;(2)蝌蚪不会吃掉棍棒鱼卵,也不会扰乱棍棒鱼的巢;(3)当对方出现时,这两个物种对微生境的利用都会发生轻微变化。我们的研究结果表明,如果在麝香鱼种群建立起来之前采取措施遏制棍背鱼对蝌蚪的捕食,那么这两个物种很可能可以成功地共同管理。在迁移之前利用原生境研究来评估物种间的相互作用,这种方法在其他物种恢复计划中可能会被证明是有用的。在栖息地有限的情况下,多物种迁移可以更好地利用现有资源,并通过重建本地物种之间的相互作用促进生态系统的恢复。
{"title":"Assessing the potential for successful translocation and co-management of two endangered aquatic species","authors":"S. K. Snowden, D. M. Shier, K. M. Stemp, G. F. Grether","doi":"10.1111/acv.12893","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12893","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Translocation programmes for endangered species typically focus on a single species, but in areas where little native habitat remains, it may be necessary to translocate multiple species to the same sites. Interactions between translocated species, such as predation and competition, are among the factors that need to be considered when planning multispecies translocations. Translocation sites for aquatic species are particularly scarce in southern California, where a limited number of sites exist for historically co-occurring endangered mountain yellow-legged frogs <i>Rana muscosa</i> and unarmoured three-spine sticklebacks <i>Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni</i>. To determine how these species would interact if translocated to the same sites, we carried out experiments ex situ with <i>R. muscosa</i> tadpoles and a surrogate subspecies of stickleback (<i>G. a. microcephalus</i>). We found that (1) adult sticklebacks preyed on hatchling tadpoles but did not consume <i>R. muscosa</i> eggs or large tadpoles; (2) tadpoles did not consume stickleback eggs or disturb sticklebacks nests; and (3) both species' microhabitat use shifted slightly when the other was present. Our results suggest that these species can likely be co-managed successfully, if measures are taken to curb stickleback predation on tadpoles until the <i>R. muscosa</i> population is well established. Using ex situ studies to evaluate species interactions prior to translocation is an approach that could prove useful in other species recovery programmes. Multispecies translocations could make better use of available resources when habitat is limited and promote ecosystem recovery by re-establishing interactions among native species.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 2","pages":"148-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12893","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42094669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Iberian lynx has shown a favourable demographic trajectory in the last decade as a result of the conservation measures adopted which are still ongoing. However, the viability of the species is still compromised by genetic factors. Here, we used the GESP software that predicts the effective population size (Ne) and inbreeding accumulation (∆f) over time in metapopulations, to find realistic scenarios that guarantee the genetic viability of this species. We proposed as genetic targets that Ne of the metapopulation (NeMeta) should exceed 500 in 20 generations (long term), whereas ∆f of the subpopulations (∆fx) should not exceed 0.05 in five generations (short term). The current Iberian lynx metapopulation configuration, with the expected subpopulations sizes at carrying capacity (5 subpops.; Ne1 = 100, Ne2,3,4,5 = 25), does not reach the long-term goal, with a NeMeta ~ 150 in 20 generations. The results indicate that the long-term genetic viability of the metapopulation requires an increase in the subpopulation size of 50–200%, the creation of at least 8 new subpopulations, and migration rates close to 0.1 between neighbouring subpopulations, comprising 2165 effective individuals (ca. 1100 breeding females). In addition, a minimum migration rate of 0.05 into the smallest subpopulations of Ne = 25 (i.e. 1.25 migrants/generation) is needed to avoid excessive inbreeding accumulation (short-term goal). Larger subpopulations are preferable to several smaller subpopulations with the same number of effective individuals, even when the latter are well connected. Although these requirements seem challenging to achieve in the short-medium term, the study provides key information for informed decision making by environmental managers and policymakers. The conclusions drawn here apply to other carnivores in need of conservation.
{"title":"Evaluation of the genetic viability of metapopulation scenarios for the Iberian lynx","authors":"C. Pacín, G. Garrote, J. A. Godoy","doi":"10.1111/acv.12890","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acv.12890","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Iberian lynx has shown a favourable demographic trajectory in the last decade as a result of the conservation measures adopted which are still ongoing. However, the viability of the species is still compromised by genetic factors. Here, we used the GESP software that predicts the effective population size (Ne) and inbreeding accumulation (∆f) over time in metapopulations, to find realistic scenarios that guarantee the genetic viability of this species. We proposed as genetic targets that Ne of the metapopulation (Ne<sub>Meta</sub>) should exceed 500 in 20 generations (long term), whereas ∆f of the subpopulations (∆f<sub>x</sub>) should not exceed 0.05 in five generations (short term). The current Iberian lynx metapopulation configuration, with the expected subpopulations sizes at carrying capacity (5 subpops.; Ne<sub>1</sub> = 100, Ne<sub>2,3,4,5</sub> = 25), does not reach the long-term goal, with a Ne<sub>Meta</sub> ~ 150 in 20 generations. The results indicate that the long-term genetic viability of the metapopulation requires an increase in the subpopulation size of 50–200%, the creation of at least 8 new subpopulations, and migration rates close to 0.1 between neighbouring subpopulations, comprising 2165 effective individuals (ca. 1100 breeding females). In addition, a minimum migration rate of 0.05 into the smallest subpopulations of Ne = 25 (i.e. 1.25 migrants/generation) is needed to avoid excessive inbreeding accumulation (short-term goal). Larger subpopulations are preferable to several smaller subpopulations with the same number of effective individuals, even when the latter are well connected. Although these requirements seem challenging to achieve in the short-medium term, the study provides key information for informed decision making by environmental managers and policymakers. The conclusions drawn here apply to other carnivores in need of conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 1","pages":"112-123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12890","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41469336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}